APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Fall 2019)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Fall 2019) NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Feminism and Philosophy FALL 2019 VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 1 INTRODUCTION Robin Zheng Lauren Freeman Women, Work, and Power: Envisaging the #MeToo and Philosophy Radical Potential of #MeToo ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON Julia R. S. Bursten FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY Field Notes on Conference Climate: A Decade with the Philosophy of Science SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND Association’s Women’s Caucus INFORMATION BOOK REVIEWS ARTICLES Hilkje Charlotte Hänel: What Is Rape? Miranda Pilipchuk Social Theory and Conceptual Analysis Reviewed by Caleb Ward Good Survivor, Bad Survivor: #MeToo and the Moralization of Survivorship A. Altman and L. Watson: Debating Pornography Sarah Clark Miller Reviewed by Mari Mikkola Beyond Silence, Towards Refusal: The Epistemic Possibilities of #MeToo Shelley L. Tremain: Foucault and Feminist Philosophy of Disability Reviewed by Catherine Clune-Taylor Cassie Herbert The Speech Acts of #MeToo NEWS FROM THE CSW Lori Watson ANNOUNCEMENTS #MeToo? CONTRIBUTOR BIOS Alice MacLachlan #MeToo vs. Mea Culpa: On the Risks of Public Apologies VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 1 FALL 2019 © 2019 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION ISSN 2155-9708 APA NEWSLETTER ON Feminism and Philosophy LAUREN FREEMAN, EDITOR VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 1 | FALL 2019 way and to a different end. At around noon on October 15, INTRODUCTION 2017, Actress Alyssa Milano encouraged spreading the hashtag #MeToo on social media, in order to draw attention #MeToo and Philosophy to the prevalence and pervasiveness of sexual harassment and assault by showing how many people have personally Lauren Freeman experienced such events. By six o’clock p.m. on the same UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE day, the hashtag had been shared over 200,000 times; by noon the next day, over 500,000 times. On Facebook, the [Content warning for discussion of sexual violence.] hashtag was used by over 4.7 million people in 12 million posts in the first 24 hours. Facebook has estimated that 45 Continuing an important legacy of Black women’s advocacy percent of US users had at least one friend who had posted for sexual violence survivors, in 2006 Tarana Burke, a Black the statement “me too.”2 As of October 2018, #MeToo has feminist, social activist, and community organizer, founded been tweeted more than 19 million times.3 the Me Too movement. Her founding of this movement was a culmination of sorts, after having worked with Black As Tarana Burke has recently said, “What #MeToo allowed female survivors of sexual violence for over a decade. people to do was create community with these shared Beginning in the late 1990s, Burke was working in Selma, experiences. You have a built-in group of people who Alabama, with youth, many of whom had been victims of automatically gets you, who automatically believes you, sexual violence. Burke herself had also been a victim of who automatically wants to hear you. That’s the wildfire repeated sexual assault, beginning from the age of six. One of it.”4 As Miranda Pilipchuk discusses in her contribution day, Burke was talking to Heaven, a thirteen-year-old girl to this issue, “This emphasis on marginalized survivors is who she could tell wanted to confide in her about abuse particularly important given that many of the white-led she’d experienced. Knowing where the conversation was anti-violence movements that have gained national uptake going, and that Burke herself was not in a place where she have largely failed to address the concerns of marginalized could properly respond to someone else’s trauma, she survivors.” For Burke, the aim of the movement is to cut the conversation short, before it went there. Later, she provide resources to people to help them heal and to regretted that decision immensely. “I cut her off,” Burke advocate for changes to laws and policies. Specifically, recounted. “She was so hurt and devastated. That moment she’s emphasized goals like processing all untested taught me the power of empathy. All she needed was to rape kits, re-thinking local school policies, improving the hear the words, ‘Me, too’.”1 ways in which teachers are vetted, and updating sexual harassment policies.5 For Burke, the aim of the movement Burke knew that these girls needed help. She also knew ought to be focused on survivors and not on perpetrators. that, at the time, she was not equipped to offer the kind of For Milano, a priority of #MeToo is to challenge the laws help they needed, so she sought advice from and possible surrounding sexual harassment and assault, for example, collaboration with a local rape-crisis center. This proved to implementing legislation that makes it difficult for publicly be a dead end, as she was told that the center would only traded companies to hide cover-up payments from their work with girls who had gotten a referral from the local stockholders and to make it illegal for employers to require police department after they’d filed an official report. Burke new employees to sign non-disclosure agreements as a knew how sexual assault worked and how police are often condition of employment.6 the last people survivors go to, let alone trust, after having experienced sexual assault. So, in 2003, she started Just #MeToo continues to loom large in the national and Be, Inc., a non-profit organization that aims to help women international consciousness as increasingly more men are heal from sexual assault. In 2006, she named the movement accused and charged of sexual harassment and sexual Me Too. The focus of this movement was to respond to the assault. And yet the number of cases that go unreported experiences of abuse suffered by Black and brown girls and and the number of women who remain silent is even larger, women who are and remain disproportionately vulnerable, pointing to the systemic problems of injustice for victims of specifically, by connecting survivors of sexual assault to abuse, assault, and harassment and the systematic failures the resources they need in order to heal. of our institutions to bring about justice. All of these problems are complicated by the class, race, nationality, More than a decade later, in the wake of the growing immigration status, sexuality, gender identity, and disability accusations of sexual harassment and assault by film mogul of victims. Harvey Weinstein, the term “me too” resurfaced in a different APA NEWSLETTER | FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY #MeToo is a crucial form of resistance and the #MeToo an epistemic transformation, and, more broadly, as a lens movement, in all of its complexity, is ripe for philosophical to better understand some of the epistemic dimensions of engagement and analysis. In October 2018, in collaboration what she saw happening around her. Of import, Miller coins, with The CUNY Graduate Center Advanced Research unpacks, and develops the term “epistemic refusal,” which Collaborative, the Center for the Humanities, the Philosophy refers to the strategy of breaking one’s silence, in one’s own Program, and Hunter College, Linda Martín Alcoff and way, on one’s own terms, thereby refusing the dominant Charles Mills organized and hosted an interdisciplinary epistemic structures that have kept us tightly in check. conference on “#MeToo and Epistemic Injustice.” Aside from that, there has been no sustained philosophical Miller’s paper shows how the mass informal disclosure of treatment of the #MeToo movement. The present issue survivor status of #MeToo that took place in conjunction of the Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy aims both with other hashtags like #WhyIDidntReport and to fill this lacuna and also to start more of a profession- #BelieveHer has created space for epistemic, ethical, wide discussion about what philosophy and philosophers and political community between survivors of sexual have to contribute to the movement. Because this is the violence, specifically by denying the hegemonic epistemic first sustained treatment of #MeToo by philosophers, it discourses of contemporary rape culture. A key insight does not claim to be comprehensive by any means. Yet, of Miller’s paper is her discussion of the ways that mass the papers that you will find here begin some important informal disclosure of sexual violation can “shift the conversations. focus from the credibility of the survivor to the wrongful actions of the perpetrator—moving feelings of shame and Miranda Pilipchuk’s article, “Good Survivor, Bad Survivor: responsibility away from victim and back onto perpetrator.” #MeToo and the Moralization of Survivorship,” examines The implications of this point have great moral and political how #MeToo’s reliance on disclosure has resulted in promise as we consider how to move forward in building moral dilemmas for survivors and, more generally, in a communities of solidarity and epistemic subcultures for moralization of survivorship itself. She begins by situating and between survivors in the #MeToo era and beyond. This Burke’s original version of Me Too within the historical idea might also help us to reconcile some of the goals of legacy of Black women’s advocacy for sexual violence #MeToo with the original guiding initiatives of the Me Too survivors and then highlights the central features that movement. differentiate Burke’s original version of Me Too from the viral social media version of the movement. Pilipchuck Though it seems as though #MeToo has launched a then goes on to discuss the nature of disclosure within the paradigmatic shift in the way that we collectively understand context of #MeToo and argues that the impetus to disclose sexual assault—just look at the number of times the hashtag has created a moral hierarchy of survivors, where survivors has been shared on social media—in “The Speech Acts of who publicly disclose receive greater moral standing than #MeToo,” Cassie Herbert asks whether the movement has survivors who remain silent.
Recommended publications
  • The Fan/Creator Alliance: Social Media, Audience Mandates, and the Rebalancing of Power in Studio–Showrunner Disputes
    Media Industries 5.2 (2018) The Fan/Creator Alliance: Social Media, Audience Mandates, and the Rebalancing of Power in Studio–Showrunner Disputes Annemarie Navar-Gill1 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN amngill [AT] umich.edu Abstract Because companies, not writer-producers, are the legally protected “authors” of television shows, when production disputes between series creators and studio/ network suits arise, executives have every right to separate creators from their intellectual property creations. However, legally disempowered series creators can leverage an audience mandate to gain the upper hand in production disputes. Examining two case studies where an audience mandate was involved in overturning a corporate production decision—Rob Thomas’s seven-year quest to make a Veronica Mars movie and Dan Harmon’s firing from and subsequent rehiring to his position as the showrunner of Community—this article explores how the social media ecosystem around television rebalances power in disputes between creators and the corporate entities that produce and distribute their work. Keywords: Audiences, Authorship, Management, Production, Social Media, Television Scripted television shows have always had writers. For the most part, however, until the post-network era, those writers were not “authors.” As Catherine Fisk and Miranda Banks have shown in their respective historical accounts of the WGA (Writers Guild of America), television writers have a long history of negotiating the terms of what “authorship” meant in the context of their work, but for most of the medium’s history, the cultural validation afforded to an “author” eluded them.2 This began to change, however, in the 1990s, when the term “showrunner” began to appear in television trade press.3 “Showrunner” is an unofficial title referring to the executive producer and head writer of a television series, who acts in effect as the show’s CEO, overseeing the program’s story development and having final authority in essentially all production decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dan Harmon and the #Metoo Apology
    Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, Vol. 9, No.3/4, 2019, pp. 112-125. “Redemption Follows Allocution”: Dan Harmon and the #MeToo Apology Ben Wetherbee This article analyzes comedian and TV writer Dan Harmon’s famously well-received #MeToo-era apology for sexual misconduct on the set of his sitcom Community, noting how Harmon revises the traditionally individualistic genre of the apology into a statement of advocacy for the collective moral imperative of the #MeToo movement. After discussing #MeToo as a rhetorical situation that justifiably trivializes pleas for individual forgiveness, the article analyzes Har- mon’s monologue in relation to scholarship on genre of apologia, contrasting Harmon’s with the comparatively indi- vidualistic and unsuccessful apology of Louis C.K and arguing that traditional apologies prove ill-suited to the #Me- Too era. I contend, finally, that male speakers seeking redemption for sexual misconduct should heed Harmon’s ex- ample of sustained critical self-reflection, pronounced advocacy for victims, and sustained cultivation of an ethos that merits redemption. Keywords: #MeToo, apology, apologia, allocution, Dan Harmon, rhetorical situation, differentiation, transcendence, characterological coherence The #MeToo movement hit peak momentum in late 2017, a year that saw sexual assault allegations mount against figures like Harvey Weinstein, Louis C.K., Matt Lauer, Garrison Keillor, Charlie Rose, Kevin Spacey, and a long list of other male celebrities—all of which, let us recall, succeeded the inauguration of a president who had nonchalantly boasted about grabbing women’s genitals before garnering 306 electoral votes.1 The comedian and writer Dan Harmon fittingly dubbed 2017 “the Year of the Asshole.” Taking to Twitter on New Year’s Eve of that year, the creator and former showrunner of NBC’s sitcom Community and co-creator of the Adult Swim animated series Rick and Morty offered this bit of self-deprecating, understated humor: “This was truly the Year of the Asshole.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring the Truth: a Response to the Backlash
    HONORING THE TRUTH: A RESPONSE TO THE BACKLASH by ELLEN BASS and LAURA DAVIS from THE COURAGE TO HEAL: A GUIDE FOR WOMEN SURVIVORS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE THIRD EDITION, 1994 published by HarperCollins “Honoring the Truth” is a response to the current backlash against adult survivors of child sexual abuse. If you’ve watched TV, listened to the radio, or read newspapers or magazines in the past two years, it’s likely that you’ve heard about the “false memory syndrome” and have witnessed attacks on survivors’ memories and credibility. It is these attacks we are responding to here. As in the rest of The Courage to Heal, we have included the experiences of survivors as well as practical self-help information. Unlike the rest of the book, however, we also incorporate here the work of therapists, researchers, and other experts—and more than a hundred footnotes—to place this backlash in a historical and political perspective.1 A number of survivors and professionals have read “Honoring the Truth.” Most appreciated having clear information and an analysis of the issues. One survivor wrote to us, “I felt a lot of the cloudiness of the issue fall away—I felt reassured and validated.” Another said, “I am not as likely to get sucked into the fear and doubt that the backlash is trying to perpetuate.” Yet this same survivor said it had been a lot harder to read than she 1 In writing The Courage to Heal, we listened to survivors of child sexual abuse and presented what we learned in a clear, practical, and respectful way.
    [Show full text]
  • Blame Attribution in Sexual Victimization ⇑ Carin Perilloux , Joshua D
    Personality and Individual Differences 63 (2014) 81–86 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Personality and Individual Differences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Blame attribution in sexual victimization ⇑ Carin Perilloux , Joshua D. Duntley 1, David M. Buss University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States article info abstract Article history: The current study explored how victims and third-parties attribute blame and perpetrator motivation for Received 13 October 2013 actual sexual victimization experiences. Although we do not assert that victims are responsible for per- Received in revised form 24 January 2014 petrators’ behavior, we found that some victims do not allocate all blame to their perpetrator. We sought Accepted 25 January 2014 to examine how victims and third-parties allocate blame in instances of actual completed and attempted sexual victimization and how they perceived perpetrator motivations. Victims of completed rape (n = 49) and attempted sexual assault (n = 91), and third-parties who knew a victim of sexual assault (n = 152) Keywords: allocated blame across multiple targets: perpetrator, self/victim, friends, family, and the situation. Partic- Rape ipants also described their perceptions of perpetrator’s motivation for the sexual assault. Victims tended Blame Perpetrator to assign more blame to themselves than third-parties assigned to victims. Furthermore, victims per- Victim ceived perpetrators as being more sexually-motivated than third-parties did, who viewed perpetrators Sexual violence as more power-motivated. Results suggest that perceptions of rape and sexual assault significantly differ between victims and third-party individuals who have never directly experienced such a trauma. Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • TELEVISION NOMINEES DRAMA SERIES Breaking Bad, Written By
    TELEVISION NOMINEES DRAMA SERIES Breaking Bad, Written by Sam Catlin, Vince Gilligan, Peter Gould, Gennifer Hutchison, George Mastras, Thomas Schnauz, Moira Walley-Beckett; AMC The Good Wife, Written by Meredith Averill, Leonard Dick, Keith Eisner, Jacqueline Hoyt, Ted Humphrey, Michelle King, Robert King, Erica Shelton Kodish, Matthew Montoya, J.C. Nolan, Luke Schelhaas, Nichelle Tramble Spellman, Craig Turk, Julie Wolfe; CBS Homeland, Written by Henry Bromell, William E. Bromell, Alexander Cary, Alex Gansa, Howard Gordon, Barbara Hall, Patrick Harbinson, Chip Johannessen, Meredith Stiehm, Charlotte Stoudt, James Yoshimura; Showtime House Of Cards, Written by Kate Barnow, Rick Cleveland, Sam R. Forman, Gina Gionfriddo, Keith Huff, Sarah Treem, Beau Willimon; Netflix Mad Men, Written by Lisa Albert, Semi Chellas, Jason Grote, Jonathan Igla, Andre Jacquemetton, Maria Jacquemetton, Janet Leahy, Erin Levy, Michael Saltzman, Tom Smuts, Matthew Weiner, Carly Wray; AMC COMEDY SERIES 30 Rock, Written by Jack Burditt, Robert Carlock, Tom Ceraulo, Luke Del Tredici, Tina Fey, Lang Fisher, Matt Hubbard, Colleen McGuinness, Sam Means, Dylan Morgan, Nina Pedrad, Josh Siegal, Tracey Wigfield; NBC Modern Family, Written by Paul Corrigan, Bianca Douglas, Megan Ganz, Abraham Higginbotham, Ben Karlin, Elaine Ko, Steven Levitan, Christopher Lloyd, Dan O’Shannon, Jeffrey Richman, Audra Sielaff, Emily Spivey, Brad Walsh, Bill Wrubel, Danny Zuker; ABC Parks And Recreation, Written by Megan Amram, Donick Cary, Greg Daniels, Nate DiMeo, Emma Fletcher, Rachna
    [Show full text]
  • Read Our Educational Booklet
    COMPASS CHANGE THE JOIN THE HAVE THE CONVERSATION CONVERSATION CONVERSATION Spreading facts to change Leadership stepping Empowering victims of sexual the stereotypes about rape up to put an end to violence to heal through open and sexual violence sexual violence discussion Sojourner House is the domestic violence shelter in Mahoning County, shelters over 100 families each year that are survivors of domestic violence providing a safe, violent-free environment to heal and chart a new course. Services are free of charge. WHAT IS SEXUAL VIOLENCE? Sexual violence is whenever sexuality is used as a weapon to gain power or control over someone. UNWANTED CHILD SEXUAL TRAFFICKING HARASSMENT CONTACT ABUSE DOMESTIC INCEST STALKING RAPE VIOLENCE WHAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT? Sexual Assault is any forced or coerced sexual activity such as unwanted contact, committed against a person’s will or without consent. Rape is a sexual assault that includes but is not limited to forced vaginal, anal, and oral penetration. Rape and sexual assault are crimes of violence with sex used as a weapon that can be committed by strangers, teens, friends, relatives, men, women, dates, partners, lovers, and spouses. WHAT IS CONSENT? WHAT IS COERCION? Consent is a verbal, physical and emotional Coercion is used in an attempt to pressure a agreement that is clear, mutual and ongoing. person to do something they might not want to do. • Consent can only exist when there is equal • Flattery, guilt trips, intimidation or threats are used power and no pressure between partners. to manipulate a person’s choices. • Consent for some things does not mean • Even if someone gives in to coercion, it is NOT consent for all things.
    [Show full text]
  • On Not Blaming and Victim Blaming
    teorema Vol. XXXIX/3, 2020, pp. 95-128 ISSN: 0210-1602 [BIBLID 0210-1602 (2020) 39:3; pp. 95-128] On Not Blaming and Victim Blaming Joel Chow Ken Q and Robert H. Wallace RESUMEN En este artículo se muestra que ser culpable por acusar a una víctima es estructu- ralmente similar a ser culpable por no acusar. Ambos fenómenos se ajustan a los perfiles tradicionales de la responsabilidad moral: la condición de conocimiento y la condición de control. Pero lo interesante es que en ellos conocimiento y control son condiciones in- terdependientes. Al tener una relación con otra persona se dispone de distintos grados de conocimiento sobre ella. A su vez, este conocimiento proporciona distintos grados de in- fluencia mutua a los sujetos de la relación. Ejemplos en los que alguien es especialmente culpable por no acusar a un amigo, a un colega cercano o a un cónyuge así lo atestiguan. La interdependencia de estas dos condiciones en las relaciones interpersonales aclara (parcialmente) por qué es moralmente malo acusar a una víctima. Se argumenta que los que acusan a las víctimas padecen una forma de miopía moral al fijarse únicamente en lo que la víctima podría hacer, por el hecho de tener algún tipo de relación con el causante del abuso, para evitar este. De manera particular, se atiende a los casos en los que la mio- pía moral se alimenta de relatos y esquemas de género jerárquicos y misóginos. PALABRAS CLAVE: responsabilidad moral, ética de la acusación, acusación a las víctimas, normas, misoginia. ABSTRACT In this paper we show that being blameworthy for not blaming and being blame- worthy for victim blaming are structurally similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency and First-Person Authority by Matthew Thomas Parrott A
    Agency and First-Person Authority By Matthew Thomas Parrott A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Barry Stroud, Co-Chair Professor Daniel Warren, Co-Chair Professor Alison Gopnik Spring 2011 © 2011 Copyright Matthew Thomas Parrott All rights reserved Abstract Agency and First-Person Authority By Matthew Thomas Parrott Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professor Barry Stroud, Co-Chair Professor Daniel Warren, Co-Chair Ordinarily when someone tells us about her psychological states, we presume that she is right. By deferring to her in this way, we treat her as a kind of authority on her own psychological life. Although a person usually has this authority, she lacks it whenever she takes a more detached, indirect, or third-personal point of view toward her psychological states. We see this, for example, when she learns about a belief or desire from a friend or therapist. For this reason an adequate account of the phenomenon of "first-person authority" must explain why we have it only for some but not all of our psychological states. Most philosophers believe first-person authority is an epistemic phenomenon, consisting in each of us being better situated to know about our own psychological states than anyone else. Against all such epistemic views, I argue that, because they base their accounts on epistemic privileges that are in principle available to anyone, they cannot capture the exclusively first-personal character of our authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Violence
    Workplace Violence Dana Bartlett, BSN, MSN, MA, CSPI Dana Bartlett is a professional nurse and author. His clinical experience includes 16 years of ICU and ER experience and over 20 years of as a poison control center information specialist. Dana has published numerous CE and journal articles, written NCLEX material, written textbook chapters, and done editing and reviewing for publishers such as Elsevire, Lippincott, and Thieme. He has written widely on the subject of toxicology and was a contributing editor, toxicology section, for Critical Care Nurse journal. He is currently employed at the Rocky Mountain Poison Control Center. ABSTRACT Workplace violence is a complex and widespread issue that has received increased attention from the public, mental health experts, law enforcement, and healthcare professionals. Workplace violence in healthcare can include violence from the patient, relatives and friends of patients, and it also includes workplace bullying. Pain, anxiety, loss of control, powerlessness, and disorientation may result in aggressive incidents against healthcare workers. Violence in emergency departments may result due to varied reasons, including access to weapons and crowded and emotional situations occurring in emergency settings. Some healthcare organizations have implemented a code for violence that evokes a rapid response. The incidence of occurrences, type of violent incidents and prevention of violence are discussed. 1 nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com Policy Statement This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the policies of NurseCe4Less.com and the continuing nursing education requirements of the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation for registered nurses. It is the policy of NurseCe4Less.com to ensure objectivity, transparency, and best practice in clinical education for all continuing nursing education (CNE) activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Environments of Intelligence
    Environments of Intelligence “An absorbing volume that integrates an extraordinarily wide area of work, with interesting observations and new twists right to the end.” Ruth Millikan, University of Connecticut, USA What is the role of the environment, and of the information it provides, in cognition? More specifically, may there be a role for certain artefacts to play in this context? These are questions that motivate “4E” theories of cognition (as being embodied, embedded, extended, enactive). In his take on that family of views, Hajo Greif first defends and refines a concept of information as primarily natural, environmen- tally embedded in character, which had been eclipsed by information-processing views of cognition. He continues with an inquiry into the cognitive bearing of some artefacts that are sometimes referred to as “intelligent environments”. With- out necessarily having much to do with Artificial Intelligence, such artefacts may ultimately modify our informational environments. With respect to human cognition, the most notable effect of digital computers is not that they might be able, or become able, to think but that they alter the way we perceive, think and act. Hajo Greif teaches at the Munich Center for Technology in Society (MCTS), Technical University of Munich, Germany, and the Department of Philosophy, University of Klagenfurt, Austria. His research interests cover the philosophy – and some of the history and the social studies – of science and technology, as well as the philosophy of mind. History and Philosophy of Technoscience Series Editor: Alfred Nordmann For a full list of titles in this series, please visit www.routledge.com 1 Error and Uncertainty in Scientific Practice Marcel Boumans, Giora Hon and Arthur C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sharing Economy: Disrupting the Business and Legal Landscape
    THE SHARING ECONOMY: DISRUPTING THE BUSINESS AND LEGAL LANDSCAPE Panel 402 NAPABA Annual Conference Saturday, November 5, 2016 9:15 a.m. 1. Program Description Tech companies are revolutionizing the economy by creating marketplaces that connect individuals who “share” their services with consumers who want those services. This “sharing economy” is changing the way Americans rent housing (Airbnb), commute (Lyft, Uber), and contract for personal services (Thumbtack, Taskrabbit). For every billion-dollar unicorn, there are hundreds more startups hoping to become the “next big thing,” and APAs play a prominent role in this tech boom. As sharing economy companies disrupt traditional businesses, however, they face increasing regulatory and litigation challenges. Should on-demand workers be classified as independent contractors or employees? Should older regulations (e.g., rental laws, taxi ordinances) be applied to new technologies? What consumer and privacy protections can users expect with individuals offering their own services? Join us for a lively panel discussion with in-house counsel and law firm attorneys from the tech sector. 2. Panelists Albert Giang Shareholder, Caldwell Leslie & Proctor, PC Albert Giang is a Shareholder at the litigation boutique Caldwell Leslie & Proctor. His practice focuses on technology companies and startups, from advising clients on cutting-edge regulatory issues to defending them in class actions and complex commercial disputes. He is the rare litigator with in-house counsel experience: he has served two secondments with the in-house legal department at Lyft, the groundbreaking peer-to-peer ridesharing company, where he advised on a broad range of regulatory, compliance, and litigation issues. Albert also specializes in appellate litigation, having represented clients in numerous cases in the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and California appellate courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Epistemological Realism As an Intuitive Doctrine Ron Wilburn
    Dialogos, 78 (2001) pp. Ss-73 IS THE SKEPTIC'S REASONING OUR OWN? EPISTEMOLOGICAL REALISM AS AN INTUITIVE DOCTRINE RON WILBURN I. INTRODUCTION Is the skeptic's reasoning our own? That is, is the ske ptic's reasoning recognizably ordinary, or is it a product, so to speak, of pre mises and inferential standards peculiar to distitzctively philosophical preoccu­ patio ns? The question is an important one on two levels. At a general level, it is important to those who, like myself, regard skepticism as a paradigmatic philosophical issue. For, as such, it raises fundamental con­ cerns regarding the status of philosophical reasoning generally. But even at a mo re particu lar level, it raises interesting concerns about the status and do main of episte mology. For, if it could be shown that there is something significantly artificial about the skeptic's global concerns over the possibility of empirica l knowledge, then the more parochial and immanent agendas of naturalistic knowledge theory would seem to ac­ quire validation. This is because the challenge that has been posed by Stro ud and othe rs to naturalized episte mology's compre he nsiveness qua knowledge theory would have been met. Thus, my concern : Is the skeptic's reasoning about knowledge truly our own? Is his negative proclamation a discovery about w hat we can all reflectively recognize as our true epistemic relation to the world, or is it an artifact of some per­ verse obsessio n that the skeptic has with an idealized episte mo logical relation of concern only to him? In the space I have available here, I would like to address at least one aspect of this question.
    [Show full text]