REDUCTION 2011-2014 Deliverable 5.2 Report on Collective Evaluation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REDUCTION 2011‐2014 Deliverable 5.2 Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1 31 August 2014 D5.2 [Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1] Public Document II D5.2 [Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1] Project acronym: REDUCTION Project full title: Reducing Environmental Footprint based on Multi‐Modal Fleet management Systems for Eco‐Routing and Driver Behaviour Adaptation Work Package: WP5 Document title: Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1 Version: 5.0 Official delivery date: 31/08/2014 Actual publication date: 31/08/2014 Type of document: Report Nature: Public Authors: Dimitrios Katsaros (UTH), Chrysi Laspidou (UTH), Stavroula Maglavera (UTH), Nikolaos Lemonas (UTH), Kristian Torp (AAU), Ove Andersen (AAU), Kyriacos Mouskos (CTL), Athanasios Lois (TrainOSE), Marcel Morssink (TRI) III D5.2 [Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1] Approved by: REDUCTION consortium partners Version Date Sections Affected 0.1 27/12/2012 Initial empty template 1.0 25/01/2013 Updated by Aalborg, FlexDanmark 1.1 05/02/2013 Updated by TrainOSE 1.2 18/02/2013 Updated by Aalborg, FlexDanmark 1.3 21/02/2013 Updated by UTH 1.4 22/02/2013 Updated by CTL 2.1 23/02/2013 Updated to correct various issues 2.2 27/02/2013 Review comments processed 3.0 19/08/2013 Major updates by TRI and CTL 4.0 12/02/2014 Updated to reflect 2nd review comments 5.0 26/08/2014 Various changes and corrections IV D5.2 [Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1] Executive Summary Field operational testing is widely recognized as an effective instrument to test new transport technologies and methodologies in the real world. Previous experience has shown that field trials are an excellent way to raise awareness, collect real data, and enhance the take‐up of ICT solutions. Field tests have also proved to be a powerful tool for gaining insight into the way new functions and systems suit the user when operated in a real context. Following these best practises, REDUCTION has designed three field trials. One is run by TrainOSE to develop and test multimodal services in Greece by combining train services, with taxi and bus services. The other field trial run by FlexDanmark deploys a large taxi fleet in order to develop techniques for the reduction of the GHG emissions from vehicles, establishing environmental profiles of vehicle types, and also estimate GHG emissions based on GNSS measurements. The third field trial run by CTL (and its two complementary simulation‐based trials one run by CTL itself and other run by UTH), aims at collecting data for driver behaviour analysis, for hardware and communications/networking protocols testing. In the course of project lifetime, one more field study – that by Trinite Automation – were added to investigate the traffic control center’s perspective. The present document describes the outcomes of the first phase of the field trials. V D5.2 [Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1] Table of Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................. V Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................6 List of Tables.............................................................................................................................................12 List of Figures ...........................................................................................................................................15 Glossary.....................................................................................................................................................17 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................18 1.1 Project Overview............................................................................................................................18 1.2 Work Package Objectives and Tasks...........................................................................................18 1.3 Objective of this Deliverable.........................................................................................................19 2. Related work to REDUCTION’s field trials .....................................................................................21 2.1 EuroFOT field trials .......................................................................................................................21 2.2 simTD field trials............................................................................................................................22 2.3 CVIS .................................................................................................................................................22 2.4 EcoDriver.........................................................................................................................................23 2.5 In‐Time ............................................................................................................................................23 2.6 What’s appropriate and what’is missing for REDUCTION ....................................................24 3. Field Trials: A generic description.....................................................................................................25 4. FlexDanmark Field Trial: Phase‐1......................................................................................................26 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................26 4.2 Nature of the trial...........................................................................................................................26 6 D5.2 [Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1] 4.3 Description of the input ................................................................................................................27 4.3.1 Travel‐time Map......................................................................................................................27 4.3.2 Eco Map....................................................................................................................................27 4.3.3 Trips ..........................................................................................................................................28 4.3.4 Web Services Details...............................................................................................................29 (1) FlexDanmark Web Service .................................................................................................29 (a) Input ......................................................................................................................................29 (b) Output...................................................................................................................................29 (c) Implementation....................................................................................................................29 (2) Speed Chart Web Service ...................................................................................................30 (a) Input ......................................................................................................................................30 (b) Output...................................................................................................................................31 (c) Implementation....................................................................................................................31 (3) Eco‐Routing Web Service ...................................................................................................32 (a) Input ......................................................................................................................................32 (b) Output...................................................................................................................................33 (c) Implementation....................................................................................................................34 4.4 Description of the output..............................................................................................................35 4.4.1 Use Scenario.............................................................................................................................35 4.4.2 Use Cases from D3.1...............................................................................................................40 4.4.3 Business Goals .........................................................................................................................42 4.5 Obstacles in running the field trial ..............................................................................................43 7 D5.2 [Report on Collective Evaluation from Field Trials in Phase‐1] 4.5.1 Risks from D3.1 .......................................................................................................................43 4.5.2 Open Issues from D3.3 ...........................................................................................................44 4.5.3 Open Issues from D5.1 ...........................................................................................................44