DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Power Uef Cover.Ai

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Power Uef Cover.Ai CAPE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL KAAPSE METROPOLITAANSE RAAD IBHUNGA LOLAWULO LWENQILAYEKAPA REPORT OF THE BIENNIAL UEF MEETING Cover in Illustrator UNCHS United Nations Centre for United Nations United Nations Human Settlements (Habitat) Development Programme Environmental Programme This meeting was made possible through the generous support of our partners C A P E M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L K A A P S E M E T R O P O L I T A A N S E R A A D IBHUNGA LOLAWULO LWENQILA YEKAPA Dutch Ministry of French Ministry of Foreign Affairs Cape Metropolitan Council Foreign Affairs General Directorate for General Directorate for International Cooperation and International Cooperation Development (DGIS) (DGCID) Urban Environment Forum UEF Secretariat United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS Habitat) United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-2-623225, Fax: +254-2-623715 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.unchs.org/uef Nairobi, May 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS UEF 2000 Biennial Meeting Report ................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Meeting Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 UEF 2000: Theme and Focus of the Meeting ...............................................................................................................................4 Structure of the Meeting ...............................................................................................................................................5 Main Results .....................................................................................................................................................................6 UEF 2000 Closing Statement ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Meeting Results by Session ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Opening of the Meeting, Introduction and Experiences from South Africa....................................................14 Experiences from Cities, Experiences from International Support Programmes and Intergovernmental Institutions .................................................................................................................................15 Working Group Session 1 - City and programme experiences in participating actively in the development and implementation of global norms, international environmental conventions and agreements .................................................................................................................................15 Working Group 1, WG Session 1– Air Pollution ................................................................................................16 Working Group 2, WG Session 1– Land-based Impact on Eco-systems ....................................................18 Working Group 3, WG Session 1– Bio-diversity ................................................................................................19 Working Group 4, WG Session 1– Decentralisation .......................................................................................21 Working Group 5, WG Session 1– Transparency .............................................................................................22 Working Group 6, WG Session 1– Security .......................................................................................................24 Working Group Session 2 - Building capacities and mechanisms to develop and implement global norms, international environmental conventions and agreements ..............................25 Working Group 1, WG Session 2 – EPM Demonstration...................................................................................25 Working Group 2, WG Session 2 – Networking .................................................................................................26 Working Group 3, WG Session 2 – Specialised Expertise ................................................................................27 Working Group 4, WG Session 2 – Research and Policies ..............................................................................29 Working Group 5, WG Session 2 – Strategic Financing ...................................................................................30 Closing Session ................................................................................................................................................................ 31 The Urban Environmental Bazaar ................................................................................................................................... 32 Annexes ............................................................................................................................................................................ 33 UEF Meeting Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 34 UEF Meeting Agenda ...................................................................................................................................................... 35 Keynote Presentations .................................................................................................................................................... 41 Cocktail, Opening and Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 41 International Agreements for a Better Urban Environment .................................................................................54 Global Norms for Good Urban Governance ..........................................................................................................57 Cities, the Environment, and International Conventions, Agreements and Norms ........................................60 Experiences from South Africa ...................................................................................................................................... 65 Johannesburg – Towards a sustainable city ........................................................................................................... 65 Local Government and Sustainable Urban Development: What will our reforms achieve? .......................67 Durban Metropolitan Environmental Policy – Towards Implementation ..........................................................69 Race, Inequality and Urbanisation in the Johannesburg Region, 1946-1996 ...................................................73 Midrand EcoCity Project .............................................................................................................................................83 Experiences from Cities .................................................................................................................................................. 89 Experiences of Manila, Philippines, with international environmental agreements on air pollution..................................................................................................................................................................89 Experience of Dakar, Senegal, with international environmental agreements related to land-based impact on ecosystems and the marine environment ..................................................................94 Experience of Cape Town, South Africa, with international environmental agreements on bio-diversity - Spatial restructuring and environmental enhancement in the CMA ...............................96 Experience of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, with decentralisation of authority and resources .........................98 Experience of Recife, Brazil, with security of individuals and their living environment in the urban environmental planning and management process ................................................................104 Experiences from International Support Programmes .............................................................................................. 115 Supporting Cities to apply international agreements on the protection of the ozone layer, freshwater resources and Bio-diversity at the city level............................................................115 Supporting cities to apply international agreements related to land-based impact on ecosystems and the marine environment: Experience in the Mediterranean region ........................119 Supporting cities to improve transparency and accountability in decision-making and stakeholder participation at the city level ......................................................................................................... 122 Supporting cities in decentralisation of authority and resources at the city level .......................................125 Supporting cities in providing gender responsive tools for applying global norms and international conventions.......................................................................................................................................127
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intero Paese
    Camera dei Deputati —1— Audizione – 26 XV LEGISLATURA — III COMMISSIONE — SEDUTA DEL 13 NOVEMBRE 2007 COMMISSIONE III AFFARI ESTERI E COMUNITARI RESOCONTO STENOGRAFICO AUDIZIONE 26. SEDUTA DI MARTEDI` 13 NOVEMBRE 2007 PRESIDENZA DEL PRESIDENTE UMBERTO RANIERI INDICE PAG. PAG. Sulla pubblicita` dei lavori: Azzolini Claudio (FI) .................................. 10 Ranieri Umberto, Presidente ...................... 3 De Zulueta Tana (Verdi) ............................ 7 Farina Gianni (PD-U) ................................. 8 Khalil Alı` Raschid (RC-SE) ....................... 9 Audizione del sottosegretario di Stato per gli affari esteri, Gianni Vernetti, sulla situa- Paoletti Tangheroni Patrizia (FI) .............. 10 zione in Pakistan (ai sensi dell’articolo 143, Rivolta Dario (FI) ........................................ 7 comma 2, del Regolamento). Vernetti Gianni, Sottosegretario di Stato per Ranieri Umberto, Presidente ........... 3, 7, 10, 12 gli affari esteri .............................................. 3, 10 N. B. Sigle dei gruppi parlamentari: Partito Democratico-L’Ulivo: PD-U; Forza Italia: FI; Alleanza Nazionale: AN; Rifondazione Comunista-Sinistra Europea: RC-SE; UDC (Unione dei Democratici Cristiani e dei Democratici di Centro): UDC; Lega Nord Padania: LNP; Sinistra Democratica. Per il Socialismo europeo: SDpSE; Italia dei Valori: IdV; La Rosa nel Pugno: RosanelPugno; Comunisti Italiani: Com.It; Verdi: Verdi; Popolari-Udeur: Pop-Udeur; DCA-Democrazia Cristiana per le Autonomie-Partito Socialista-Nuovo PSI: DCA-NPSI; Misto: Misto; Misto-Minoranze linguistiche: Misto-Min.ling.; Misto- Movimento per l’Autonomia: Misto-MpA; Misto-Repubblicani, Liberali, Riformatori: Misto-RLR; Misto-La Destra: Misto-Destra. PAGINA BIANCA Camera dei Deputati —3— Audizione – 26 XV LEGISLATURA — III COMMISSIONE — SEDUTA DEL 13 NOVEMBRE 2007 PRESIDENZA DEL PRESIDENTE Benazir Bhutto, uno dei leader dell’oppo- UMBERTO RANIERI sizione pachistana, contribuisce ovvia- mente a creare un clima di tensione, di La seduta comincia alle 12.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009CIRES Annual Report
    Climate Diagnostics Center Center for Limnology Center for Science and Technology Policy Research National Snow and Ice Data Center Earth Science and Observation Center Cryospheric and Polar Processes Ecosystem Science Environmental Chemistry Environmental Observations, Modeling, and Forecasting Solid Earth Sciences Weather and Climate Dynamics 2009 CIRES Annual Report COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES i COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Agreement No. NA17RJ1229 University of Colorado at Boulder UCB 216 Boulder, CO 80309-0216 Phone: 303-492-1143 Fax: 303-492-1149 email: [email protected] http://cires.colorado.edu CIRES Director Konrad Steffen CIRES Associate Director William M. Lewis, Jr. Annual Report Staff Suzanne van Drunick, Coordinator [email protected] Katy Human, Editor Steve Miller, Design ii Table of Contents From the Director 3 Executive Summary and Research Highlights 5 Contributions to NOAA’s Strategic Vision 12 The Institute: Year in Review 16 Administration and Funding 18 Creating a Dynamic Research Environment 20 CIRES People and Projects Faculty Fellows Research 24 Scientific Centers 62 Education and Outreach 74 Visiting Fellows 76 Innovative Research Projects 79 Graduate Student Research Fellowships 98 Diversity and Undergraduate Research Programs 101 Theme Reports Advanced Modeling and Observing Systems 103 Climate System Variability 122 Geodynamics 142 Planetary Metabolism 143 Regional Processes 145 Integrating Activities 158 Measures of Achievement: Calendar Year 2007 Publications by the Numbers 165 Refereed publications 166 Non-refereed Publications 195 Refereed Journals in which CIRES Scientists Published 202 Honors and Awards 204 Service 206 Appendices Governance and Management 211 Personnel Demographics 215 Acronyms 216 CIRES Annual Report 2009 1 From the Director Our forward-thinking scientists are improving the monitoring and assessment of climate variability and change, the development of models, and the prediction of environmental changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    United Nations Environment Programme PERSPECTIVES ISSUE NO 20 UNEP AND CIVIL SOCIETY: AN EXCHANGE A NEW LANDSCAPE FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN UNEP? Mark Halle, Executive Director, International Institute for Sustainable Development Felix Dodds, Senior Fellow at the Global Research Institute, University of North Carolina 1. Introduction This issue of “Perspectives” presents a discourse between Mark Halle and Felix A UNEP publication Dodds on the past and future role of civil society organisations and Major Groups series that presents and Stakeholders in the context of the United Nations Environment Programme. It is views from Major not meant to give the ultimate answer to how UNEP can best engage with non-state Groups and actors but is rather a primer to initiate and enrich a discussion on this topic among Stakeholders of Civil interested stakeholders, including in the context of the newly established United Society or about issues Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA). UNEP invites others to comment and to that are relevant for provide further views on this subject by writing to [email protected]. them. PERSPECTIVES is coordinated by UNEP’s 2. Mark Halle: Major Groups and Stakeholders Branch. When the late Maurice Strong assumed his duties as the first Executive Director The presented views of the new United Nations Environment Programme, he had a clear vision for the are entirely those of fledgling organization: one that would break through the confines of traditional the authors and do not bureaucracies and operate in an entirely new manner. necessarily reflect the The new Agenda thus embodies a pact between developed and developing views of UNEP.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: Making Them Work for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
    Multi-stakeholder partnerships: Making them work for the Post-2015 Development Agenda By Felix Dodds Senior Fellow, Global Research Institute, University of North Carolina 1 | Page NOTE: This independent study was commissioned by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and prepared by an independent consultant, Mr. Felix Dodds, Senior Researcher, Global Research Institute, University of North Carolina. The views presented do not represent those of the United Nations or any other entity. 2 | Page Executive Summary In September 2015, the United Nations will adopt a new transformative development agenda. It has been agreed in principle that multi-stakeholder partnerships between business, NGOs, Governments, the United Nations and other actors will play an important role in the implementation of the agenda. Since 2000, there has been a plethora of partnerships within and outside the United Nations, some considered effective and making an impact on development but many falling short of delivering results and incurring high transaction costs. Partnerships have been discussed at the United Nations in general terms every other year in the Second Committee of the General Assembly, the informal Partnership Forum of the Economic and Social Council, and in its subsidiary bodies (e.g. Commission on Sustainable Development). However, as the international community transitions from the MDGs to the SDGs, it is important to consider how partnerships should support the new development agenda in the post-2015 era. There is an emerging consensus that partnerships must be aligned with the new agenda and its new goals. They should be streamlined and build on already existing and successful mechanisms and processes, have a monitoring and review mechanism for review and evaluation to determine success.
    [Show full text]
  • International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts
    30IC/07/8.4 Original: English 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT Geneva, Switzerland, 26-30 November 2007 INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND THE CHALLENGES OF CONTEMPORARY ARMED CONFLICTS Document prepared by the International Committee of the Red Cross Geneva, October 2007 INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND THE CHALLENGES OF CONTEMPORARY ARMED CONFLICTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. IHL and terrorism III. Procedural principles and safeguards for internment or administrative detention IV. The conduct of hostilities 1. General issues, in particular asymmetric warfare 2. The notion of "direct participation in hostilities" 3. Regulating the use of cluster munitions V. Non-international armed conflicts VI. Regulating private military and security companies VII. Occupation and other forms of administration of foreign territory VIII. Increasing respect for IHL: The role of sanctions Annexes: 1) Procedural Principles and Safeguards for Internment / Administrative Detention in Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence 2) Agenda of the 30th San Remo Round Table on "The Conduct of Hostilities: Revisiting the Law of Armed Conflict 100 Years after the 1907 Hague Conventions and 30 Years after the 1977 Additional Protocols" 3) Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts 30IC/07/8.4 1 Executive summary The purpose of this report is to generate reflection and debate on a number of current challenges in the field of international humanitarian law (IHL) identified by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and to outline prospective ICRC action aimed at clarifying and developing IHL. The report follows up on a number of specific issues raised in a previous report on the same topic presented to the 28th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 2003 and gives an overview of new or emerging issues deserving discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Sustainable Development: What Should Rio+20 Achieve?” Friday, 29 October 2010
    Special event Second Committee, 65th Session of the General Assembly “Advancing Sustainable Development: What Should Rio+20 Achieve?” Friday, 29 October 2010 Background The concept of sustainable development is like a bridge. It seeks to bring together not only the three domains — economic, social and environmental — but also developed and developing countries, Governments, businesses and civil society, scientific knowledge and public policy, the city and the countryside, and present and future generations. It has also created the awareness that the environment and development are not two separate agendas, but two faces of the same agenda. Development is the midwife of sustainability, just as sustainability is the life support system for development. In order to secure a renewed political commitment for sustainable development, Member States decided at the 64th session of the General Assembly to organize, in Brazil in 2012, the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD)1. The Conference is to assess progress and remaining gaps in implementation of commitments made at major summits on sustainable development. It is also supposed to address new and emerging challenges. The two themes of the Conference are: green economy in the context of sustainable development, and the institutional framework for sustainable development. To guide the preparatory process, a 10-member Bureau co-chaired by Permanent Representatives from Antigua and Barbuda and Republic of Korea has been elected at the First Preparatory Committee meeting held from 17 – 19 May 2010. Other Vice-Chairs are from Argentina, Botswana, Croatia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Italy, Pakistan and the USA. Brazil is a member ex-officio. To support preparation for the Conference, the UN Secretary-General has nominated the Under-Secretary-General of Economic and Social Affairs as the Secretary-General of the Conference with the dedicated Secretariat at the Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • 598 Prelims.P65
    Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability This book is dedicated to WARREN ‘CHIP’ LINDNER (1942–2000) A dear friend and mentor, who contributed so much to sustain- able development and focusing the struggle against HIV/Aids on those in the South Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability Beyond Deadlock and Conflict Minu Hemmati with contributions from Felix Dodds, Jasmin Enayati and Jan McHarry EAR THSCAN Earthscan Publications Ltd London l Sterling, VA First published in the UK and USA in 2002 by Earthscan Publications Ltd Copyright © United Nations Environment and Development – UK Committee (UNED-UK Committee) and Minu Hemmati, 2002 All rights reserved ISBN: 1 85383 870 5 paperback 1 85383 869 1 hardback Typesetting by JS Typesetting, Wellingborough, Northants Printed and bound by Creative Print and Design, Ebbw Vale (Wales) Cover design by Danny Gillespie For a full list of publications please contact: Earthscan Publications Ltd 120 Pentonville Road London, N1 9JN, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7278 0433 Fax: +44 (0)20 7278 1142 Email: [email protected] http://www.earthscan.co.uk 22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling, VA 20166–2012, USA A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hemmati, Minu, 1963–. Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability : beyond deadlock and conflict / Minu Hemmati ; with contributions from Felix Dodds, Jasmin Enyati, and Jan McHarry. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-85383-869-1 (hardback) – ISBN 1-85383-870-5 (pbk.) 1. Sustainable development—Decision making. 2. Sustainable development— International cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability This Book Is Dedicated To
    Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability This book is dedicated to WARREN ‘CHIP’ LINDNER (1942–2000) A dear friend and mentor, who contributed so much to sustain- able development and focusing the struggle against HIV/Aids on those in the South Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability Beyond Deadlock and Conflict Minu Hemmati with contributions from Felix Dodds, Jasmin Enayati and Jan McHarry EAR THSCAN Earthscan Publications Ltd London l Sterling, VA First published in the UK and USA in 2002 by Earthscan Publications Ltd Copyright © United Nations Environment and Development – UK Committee (UNED-UK Committee) and Minu Hemmati, 2002 All rights reserved ISBN: 1 85383 870 5 paperback 1 85383 869 1 hardback Typesetting by JS Typesetting, Wellingborough, Northants Printed and bound by Creative Print and Design, Ebbw Vale (Wales) Cover design by Danny Gillespie For a full list of publications please contact: Earthscan Publications Ltd 120 Pentonville Road London, N1 9JN, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7278 0433 Fax: +44 (0)20 7278 1142 Email: [email protected] http://www.earthscan.co.uk 22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling, VA 20166–2012, USA A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hemmati, Minu, 1963–. Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability : beyond deadlock and conflict / Minu Hemmati ; with contributions from Felix Dodds, Jasmin Enyati, and Jan McHarry. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-85383-869-1 (hardback) – ISBN 1-85383-870-5 (pbk.) 1. Sustainable development—Decision making. 2. Sustainable development— International cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust and Verify
    Tr u st Did Iraq conduct a clandestine March–April nuclear weapon test? • Issue Number Number Issue The London-based Sunday Times reported on 25 February 2001 that Iraq had carried out a clandestine nuclear weapon test in 1989. The story—apparently based on interviews with several Iraqi defectors and interpretation of satellite photographs of the purported test area—was detailed and contained enough technical jargon to sound credible. If confirmed, such an event 96 • would be a significant blow to proponents of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty fi ( ) and would provide ammunition to those who argue that the agreement is unveri able. 0966 The test was reportedly conducted beneath Lake Rezazza, approximately 150 kilometres & .. – (km) southwest of central Baghdad, at 10:30 on 19 September 1989. The site was described 9221 as a ‘natural cavern’ under the lake, which had allegedly been enlarged and strengthened to serve as a cavity to ‘decouple’ or attenuate seismic signals from a blast. The nuclear device was depicted as an enriched uranium weapon that was placed on a special platform to maximise decoupling. The detonation was said to have produced a yield of 10 kilotons (kt), which would Ve r if y be expected to produce a seismic signal equivalent to an earthquake of about 5.2 magnitude. But the decoupling efforts allegedly reduced the seismic signal to 2.7 magnitude. Fortunately, it is possible to assess the veracity of the story using seismology, past experience with decoupling, and geology. An examination of global earthquake catalogues—produced by the International Seismic Center and the US Geological Survey—reveal no significant seismic activity in Iraq that day.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Re-Energize the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Climate Agreement by Felix Dodds
    How to Re-Energize the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Climate Agreement By Felix Dodds Introduction The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement on climate, gave the world a roadmap in 2015 to how we might live more sustainably on this planet. Supported by the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, the 2030 Agenda focused the means of implementation for the SDGs and Paris Agreement while also addressing financing for development more generally. After the 2030 Agenda was negotiated, it was agreed that there would be a regular annual review of a set of individual goals and targets at the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) on sustainable development. It was also agreed that the Heads of State and Government would review the entire 2030 Agenda to provide an additional level of oversight every four years. The first review of the 2030 Agenda by the Heads of State and Government will take place in September 2019, and they will conduct a similar review of the Paris Agreement in November and December 2020. This paper was originally presented at the Friends of Governance for Sustainable Development workshop in December 2018. It represented an updated paper I initially shared in September 2018 after attending a UN Foundation meeting that had been held in the margins of the UN General Assembly High Level Segment (2018). That meeting had focused on the question of whether or not we are we on track to deliver the SDGs. The outcome of that meeting made it evidently clear to me and others that we are very much not on track! As Francesca Perucci, Chief of the Statistical Branch, said at the UN Statistical Division in an interview: “Almost all areas where you see progress, if you look at the rate, or the pace of progress, it is never sufficient to meet the targets.” (Perucci, 2018) It was clear that at that point in 2018, the sustainable development community was NOT offering a coherent set of messages for the review.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretariat Distr.: Limited
    UNITED NATIONS ST /SG/SER.C/L.615 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Secretariat Distr.: Limited 6 October 2006 PROTOCOL AND LIAISON LIST OF DELEGATIONS TO THE SIXTY-FIRST SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY I. MEMBER STATES Page Page Afghanistan.........................................................................5 Cyprus.............................................................................. 32 Albania ...............................................................................5 Czech Republic ................................................................ 33 Algeria ...............................................................................6 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea .......................... 34 Andorra...............................................................................7 Denmark........................................................................... 35 Angola ................................................................................7 Djibouti ............................................................................ 36 Antigua and Barbuda ..........................................................8 Dominica.......................................................................... 36 Argentina............................................................................8 Dominican Republic......................................................... 37 Armenia..............................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Preparations for the Rio +20 Summit
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Preparations for the Rio +20 Summit Eighth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/eacom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 October 2011 HC 1026 Published on 26 October 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) (Chair) Peter Aldous MP (Conservative, Waveney) Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) [ex-officio] Neil Carmichael MP (Conservative, Stroud) Martin Caton MP (Labour, Gower) Katy Clark MP (Labour, North Ayrshire and Arran) Zac Goldsmith MP (Conservative, Richmond Park) Simon Kirby MP (Conservative, Brighton Kemptown) Mark Lazarowicz MP (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Caroline Lucas MP (Green, Brighton Pavilion) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Sheryll Murray MP (Conservative, South East Cornwall) Caroline Nokes MP (Conservative, Romsey and Southampton North) Mr Mark Spencer MP (Conservative, Sherwood) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Simon Wright MP (Liberal Democrat, Norwich South) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152A.
    [Show full text]