DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin17-July04

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin17-July04 Bar-Ilan University JULY 2004, No. 17 Marking 25 Years to the Camp David Accords Elyakim Rubinstein: “Palestinian Terror Makes Peace a Fantasy” of negotiations over Palestinian autonomy. Begin denied this emphatically, allowing that he had agreed only to a three-month freeze. “I recently checked with Supreme Court President Aharon Barak – who was the Israeli legal advisor at Camp David”, said Rubinstein. “He was in the room when Begin and Carter had this discussion; and Barak affirms Prime Last September, the BESA Center and the Minister Begin’s assertion”. Menachem Begin Heritage Center convened a symposium on Palestinian-Israeli relations Rubinstein also lamented the state of affairs to mark the twenty-fifth anniversary of the reigning in Yasser Arafat’s Palestinian Authority. Camp David Accords that set the parameters “There is no authority and no rule of law for the Egypt-Israel peace treaty and autonomy over there”, said Rubinstein. “It is a legal jungle, talks with the Palestinians. Lecturers included where total wantonness applies. Arafat carries Camp David negotiators Ambassador Meir Former Camp David negotiator Elyakim Rubinstein the blood of many on his hands. Only politics Rosenne, Dan Pattir and Elyakim Rubinstein, (today, a Supreme Court justice) speaking at the stops us from bringing him to justice as a war seminar marking the Camp David Accords as well as professors Shmuel Sandler, Gerald criminal.” Steinberg and Eytan Gilboa. In remarks that drew Israeli headlines, “The saddest thing of all – inexcusable, in fact 1 Rubinstein’s revealing lecture drew significant Rubinstein related to the controversy ongoing – is that Palestinian terror has made us despair; attention. At the time he was the secretary to this day over the “promise” that President terrorism makes peace seem like a mirage – of Prime Minister Begin’s cabinet. (After lengthy Jimmy Carter claims he received at Camp a fantasy – to most Israelis”, continued service in this post spanning the terms of five David from Prime Minister Begin to freeze Rubinstein. “For this, we can never forgive the prime ministers, Rubinstein went on to settlement construction for the entire period purveyors of terror”. become a judge, Attorney General, and most recently, a Supreme Court justice). Rubinstein BESABESA EXPENTEXPERT OPINIONOPINION decried the fact that Arab governments “had turned ‘Camp David’ into a ‘dirty word’ – signifying their disapproval of Egypt’s ‘separate’ peace deal with Israel”. Gaza Withdrawal? Do it Right by Prof. Efraim Inbar INSIDE: Prime Minister Ariel Sharon seems intent to The wisdom of the disengagement will be bring about a decision on unilateral withdrawal judged by history. Yet if Israel decides to go Honoring Zeev Bonen 3 from Gaza. Any attempt to evacuate the through with the proposed plan, it is not too thousands of settlers will be met with bitter late to make several changes that will generate Intelligence and Security Policy 4 INSIDE: resistance, undoubtedly reinforced by many positive dynamics to its implementation. BESA Marks its thousands of settler supporters determined Tenth Anniversary 5 to make the withdrawal as messy as possible. It is a big mistake to remove the three settlements in northern Gaza adjacent to the Israel will face a rerun of the heart-breaking Europe’s Mideast Failures 6 1967 border. The dismantling of these pictures of the 1979 struggle over Yamit. But settlements only reinforces expectations this time the withdrawal has no peace quid Israel and the Palestinians: Whereto? 7 among the Palestinians and the international pro quo – just the sober realization that the community that Israel will eventually withdraw New Publications 7 Palestinians are unable to deliver anything but to the 1967 borders. the continuation of terror. continued on page 2 www.besacenter.org Gaza Withdrawal?.... continued from page 1 It is counterproductive to repeat the While Cairo is not inimical to the Palestinian never overcome the intimidation applied by dangerous precedent set by Menachem Begin bleeding of Israel, it has a peace treaty with us Palestinian terrorists’ sticks. in 1979. President Bush’s statement about and is susceptible to American pressure. That demographic realities in the territories has might limit its nuisance potential. Following our withdrawal, the Palestinians in to be put to the test immediately. Otherwise Gaza should suffer. This is the only way to it remains meaningless, and we will be left The Israeli search for international agencies dissuade them from viewing Israeli withdrawal with only the impact of total withdrawal. to take over the property and infrastructure as capitulation. to be left behind in order to bring about some Israel also should reconsider the decision to equitable distribution is misguided. It is unlikely Indeed, Palestinian polls show that at least hold onto the Philadelphia corridor that serves that any humanitarian organization would be two-thirds of the Palestinians see Sharon’s as a wedge between Gaza and Egypt. This able to withstand the pressure of the withdrawal plan as a victory for their armed corridor will continue to attract considerable Palestinian gangs trying to take over the houses struggle “against the occupation.” Therefore, Palestinian military efforts and generate tension of the Jews and loot whatever was left. demonstrating that the Palestinians are even and casualties. The position that Israel should Moreover, involving international organizations in worse shape after the Israelis leave Gaza control all entries into Gaza is not tenable in has never served Israel well; it just complicates is essential to discourage terror and maintain the long run. Israel’s freedom of action. Flirting with notions a modicum of deterrence. of cooperation with international relief Furthermore, creating contiguity between organizations reflects naive thinking about the Withdrawal accompanied by significant Egypt and Gaza bestows certain advantages. nature of international relations. deprivation is not only what the Palestinians An opening to Egypt might serve as a fully deserve for their incredible anti-Semitism demographic safety valve for the Palestinians. Finally, Israel’s intention to continue with and support for the terrorist campaign against The diversion of the demographic pressures existing arrangements in supplying electricity, Israel; it also makes strategic sense. of heavily populated Gaza toward Egypt, and water, gas and fuel is unwise. So is a decision the prospects of a Hamas state there, might to allow Palestinian access to the Israeli labor In the absence of Palestinian willingness to force Cairo to adopt a more assertive role market, which should be denied. Let the enter into a dialogue with Israel that might in the evacuated territory. ungrateful Palestinians look for work in Egypt, lead to a reasonable territorial compromise, or elsewhere. inflicting pain is the only way left for Israel to Israel has an overwhelming interest in breaking influence the learning curve of the Palestinian the link between Gaza and the West Bank. Unilateral withdrawal is the opportunity to society and lead it into greater pragmatism. With over one million Palestinians in the depart from policies that have allowed the Considerable Palestinian suffering might lessen Egyptians’ lap, the Palestinian issue would take Palestinians to wage war de luxe. Our attempt the pressure for additional withdrawals. This a different form, even making it Egypt’s to differentiate between the civilian population is the rationale of unilateralism. responsibility to establish a Palestinian state in and the terrorists in order to limit support (Adapted from The Jerusalem Post, April 25, 2004) 2 Gaza – although they might refrain from doing for violence failed, inevitably. Israel could never so in accordance with their behavior when implement a strategy of winning Palestinian Gaza was under their control (1948-67). hearts and minds because Israeli carrots could Walter Russell Mead, Henry Kissinger Senior Fellow in U.S. Foreign Policy at the U.S. Council LECTURES on Foreign Relations, lectured at the BESA Center in March on “Evaluating the Foreign Lectures Policy of the Bush Administration”. He said that “Bush has generally made the right decisions Klaus Becher, associate research fellow at but needs to make better use of America’s ‘sticky the EU Institute for Security Studies in Paris, power’ to ensure long term implementation”. and visiting scholar at the BESA Center (under He criticized the Clinton administration for the auspices of the German Academic “going for broke” at the Barak-Arafat summit Exchange Service) lectured in January on at Camp David, leaving the Mideast “with “German Participation in International nothing”. He argued that “America needs some Operations Since 9/11: Military and Political sort of regional peace process –something that Dimensions”. in the dark, if you squint, will at least look like a process; some forward dynamic that we can be for – even if peace is not in the offing!” Fiamma Nirenstein, correspondent in Israel for the Italian daily La Stampa and the weekly Panorama and a lecturer in Mideast History at LUISS University in Rome, lectured in January at the BESA center on “The Dangerous Mix of Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism in Europe Today”. www.besacenter.org The BESA Center Honors Zeev Bonen BESA Center Researcher Caps Forty Years of Service in Israel's Military Industry In May, the BESA Center convened a seminar El-Op in optics and Rafael in missiles) and a Dan Meridor, a former minister, former on “Security-Related Technologies” to mark desire to open the military industries for chairman of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and publication of Dr. Zeev Bonen’s new book competition. Immediately thereafter, former Defense Committee and chairman of a national Rafael: From the Laboratory to the Battlefield, Defence Ministry budget chief Imri Tov spoke commission on reform of the military doctrine, which recounts his service to Rafael, the about the need to streamline the military spoke about the need of the political echelon weapons development authority of the Israeli industries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strateg Ic a Ssessmen T
    Strategic Assessment Assessment Strategic Volume 19 | No. 4 | January 2017 Volume 19 Volume The Prime Minister and “Smart Power”: The Role of the Israeli Prime Minister in the 21st Century Yair Lapid The Israeli-Palestinian Political Process: Back to the Process Approach | No. 4 No. Udi Dekel and Emma Petrack Who’s Afraid of BDS? Economic and Academic Boycotts and the Threat to Israel | January 2017 Amit Efrati Israel’s Warming Ties with Regional Powers: Is Turkey Next? Ari Heistein Hezbollah as an Army Yiftah S. Shapir The Modi Government’s Policy on Israel: The Rhetoric and Reality of De-hyphenation Vinay Kaura India-Israel Relations: Perceptions and Prospects Manoj Kumar The Trump Effect in Eastern Europe: Heightened Risks of NATO-Russia Miscalculations Sarah Fainberg Negotiating Global Nuclear Disarmament: Between “Fairness” and Strategic Realities Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai Strategic ASSESSMENT Volume 19 | No. 4 | January 2017 Abstracts | 3 The Prime Minister and “Smart Power”: The Role of the Israeli Prime Minister in the 21st Century | 9 Yair Lapid The Israeli-Palestinian Political Process: Back to the Process Approach | 29 Udi Dekel and Emma Petrack Who’s Afraid of BDS? Economic and Academic Boycotts and the Threat to Israel | 43 Amit Efrati Israel’s Warming Ties with Regional Powers: Is Turkey Next? | 57 Ari Heistein Hezbollah as an Army | 67 Yiftah S. Shapir The Modi Government’s Policy on Israel: The Rhetoric and Reality of De-hyphenation | 79 Vinay Kaura India-Israel Relations: Perceptions and Prospects | 93 Manoj Kumar The Trump Effect in Eastern Europe: Heightened Risks of NATO-Russia Miscalculations | 103 Sarah Fainberg Negotiating Global Nuclear Disarmament: Between “Fairness” and Strategic Realities | 117 Emily B.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Response to Terrorism
    Effective solidarity among states has become a prerequisite for ultimately succeeding in the war of the West against jihadist terrorism. A cohesive military strategy is needed for the West, the Arab states that are threatened, and Israel. It stands to reason that, just as all three face similar threats, the JERUSALEM models developed in Israel for dealing with terror merit attention in Europe and beyond. BERLIN Amb. Dore Gold President, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FROM LESSONS LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FIAMMA NIRENSTEIN (ED.) AMB. DORE GOLD | BRIG.-GEN. (RES.) YOSSI KUPERWASSER AMB. ALAN BAKER | PROF. ASA KASHER | AMB. FREDDY EYTAN Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs DR. IRWIN MANSDORF | DAN DIKER | JENNIFER ROSKIES Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM Fiamma Nirenstein (ed.) Amb. Dore Gold | Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser Amb. Alan Baker | Prof. Asa Kasher | Amb. Freddy Eytan Dr. Irwin Mansdorf | Dan Diker | Jennifer Roskies Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Read this book online: http://jcpa.org/lessons-israels-response-terrorism/ Cover photo: AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner, AP Photo/Michael Kappeler © 2017 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai St., Jerusalem, 92107 Israel Email: [email protected] Tel: 972-2-561-9281 | Fax: 972-2-561-9112 Jerusalem Center Websites: www.jcpa.org (English) | www.jcpa.org.il (Hebrew) www.jcpa-lecape.org (French) | www.jer-zentrum.org (German) www.dailyalert.org The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization. ISBN: 978-965-218-136-7 Contents Executive Summary 5 Is the Terror against Europe Different from the Terror against Israel? Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Activism and Conservatism During the Intifadas Murat ÜLGÜL* Abstract Introduction
    Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas Murat ÜLGÜL* Abstract Introduction Are soldiers more prone and likely to use force Are soldiers more prone to use force and initiate conflicts than civilians? To bring a and initiate conflicts than civilians? new insight to this question, this article compares The traditional view in the civil- the main arguments of military activism and military relations literature stresses that military conservatism theories on Israeli policies during the First and Second Intifadas. Military professional soldiers are conservative activism argues that soldiers are prone to end in the use of force because soldiers political problems with the use of force mainly are the ones who mainly suffer in war. because of personal and organizational interests Instead, this view says, it is the civilians as well as the effects of a military-mindset. The proponents of military conservatism, on the who initiate wars and conflicts because, other hand, claim that soldiers are conservative without military knowledge, they on the use of force and it is the civilians most underestimate the costs of war while likely offering military measures. Through an overvaluing the benefits of military analysis of qualitative nature, the article finds 1 action. In recent decades, military that soldiers were more conservative in the use of force during the First Intifadas and Oslo conservatism has been challenged by Peace Process while they were more hawkish in a group of scholars who argue that the the Second Intifada. This difference is explained traditional view is based on a limited by enemy conceptions and by the politicization number of cases, mainly civil-military of Israeli officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2009 Betraying Truth: Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, First Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Betraying Truth: Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting, 1 The ourJ nal for the Study of Antisemitism (JSA) 139 (2009) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. jsa1-2_cv_jsa1-2_cv 3/1/2010 3:41 PM Page 2 Volume 1 Issue #2 Volume JOURNAL for the STUDY of ANTISEMITISM JOURNAL for the STUDY of ANTISEMITISM of the STUDY for JOURNAL Volume 1 Issue #2 2009 2009 Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564792 28003_jsa_1-2 Sheet No. 3 Side A 03/01/2010 12:09:36 \\server05\productn\J\JSA\1-2\front102.txt unknown Seq: 5 26-FEB-10 9:19 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Number 2 Preface It Never Sleeps: A Note from the Editors ......................... 89 Antisemitic Incidents around the World: July-Dec. 2009, A Partial List .................................... 93 Articles Defeat, Rage, and Jew Hatred .............. Richard L. Rubenstein 95 Betraying Truth: Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019–2020 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
    Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Action and Impact in Israel and around the World Annual Report 2019–2020 Report on Jerusalem Center Projects, Social Media Campaigns, Analyses, Reports, and Conferences – in Israel and Internationally Amb. Dore Gold, President 1 The Jerusalem Center’s Path-breaking Impact on U.S. and Israel’s Foreign Policy Israel’s Critical Security Requirements for Defensible Borders, the Jerusalem Center’s flagship project over the years, has borne demonstrable fruit. Amb. Dore Gold was invited to the East Room of the White House on January 28 when President Trump unveiled the Vision for Peace to Prosperity plan. At a press conference held at the Jerusalem Center two weeks later, Ambassador David M. Friedman expressed thanks to Amb. Gold on behalf of the United States for his time and expertise in the plan’s preparation. While much work remains ahead, and whether the issue is defensible borders for Israel or legislation to outlaw payments to Palestinian terrorists, the Jerusalem Center takes pride in its measurable impact on foreign policy in Israel, the U.S. and Europe. The Trump Plan: A Changing Diplomatic Paradigm for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict The Jerusalem Center held a special briefing on Feb. 9, 2020, on the U.S. peace plan with U.S. Amb. David Friedman, Amb. Dore Gold, and Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, former head of the Research Division of IDF Military Intelligence. The Jerusalem Post reported Amb. Dore Gold with on January 31, 2020: U.S. Ambassador to Israel, David M. For the past two years, Gold said, he was fielding “dual invitations” from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Sionismo E Tangentopoli
    Venerdì 26 settembre 2014 ________________________________________________________________________________ Il sionismo e Tangentopoli Ripensiamo a Tangentopoli/1 Claudio Moffa Del sionismo non si può parlare, del sionismo si deve, in realtà, parlare per capire come gira il mondo. Ma sulla base dei fatti, questo il punto. Partiamo ad esempio dalla guerra di Gaza: in un quadro più complesso e più esteso, che può comprendere anche il disegno di una ennesima pulizia etnica nei Territori, nell’attacco israeliano dell’agosto scorso è emerso anche il fattore gas, i giacimenti contesi tra lo Stato di Israele e il semi- Stato palestinese, con la Gazprom russa come partner potenziale di Hamas. Ma cosa è successo? Da una parte l’invasione di Benjamin Netanyahu, i bombardamenti, le stragi di 2.000 civili, tra cui 400 bambini; dall’altra George Soros che ci fa sapere attraverso la 'CNN', che è stato lui a ordire il colpo di Stato a Kiev, un golpe e una crisi che almeno fino ad oggi hanno tenuto Vladimir Putin in una posizione di stallo, più difensiva che offensiva. Dunque, ecco il perfetto parallelismo, se non la perfetta intesa, tra il Sionismo territoriale (l’espansionismo di Israele, l’agire del sionismo come Stato), e dall’altra parte il Sionismo a-territoriale e transnazionale della grande finanza laica, quella delle banche spesso egemoni in Occidente, delle rivoluzioni colorate, della weltanschaung sionista diffusa, attraverso Hollywood o certe reti multimediali, ai quattro angoli del mondo, e con contenuti a 360 gradi: dalla Storia alle cronache di guerra, dall’immigrazione ‘inarrestabile’ e chi la blocca è un ‘razzista’, agli Stati-canaglia.
    [Show full text]
  • No Exit? Gaza & Israel Between Wars
    No Exit? Gaza & Israel Between Wars Middle East Report N°162 | 26 August 2015 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Gaza after the War ............................................................................................................ 2 A. National Consensus in Name Only ............................................................................ 2 B. Failure to Reconstruct ............................................................................................... 4 C. Coming Apart at the Seams ....................................................................................... 5 D. Fraying Security Threatens a Fragile Ceasefire ......................................................... 8 E. Abandoned by Egypt .................................................................................................. 10 F. Israel’s Slight Relaxation of the Blockade ................................................................. 12 III. The Logic of War and Deterrence ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of the Hostages Rode with a C-130 Descending out of the Night Sky with Its Lights Off
    The fate of the hostages rode with a C-130 descending out of the night sky with its lights off. Entebbe By John T. Correll ir France flight 139 woman and two Palestinian men—had Loss of radio contact and the change in originated in Tel Aviv no difficulty boarding with concealed course alerted Israel that the flight, with on Sunday morning, handguns and hand grenades. The aircraft, a large number of Israeli and Jewish pas- June 27, 1976, bound an Airbus 300, left Athens at 12:20 p.m. sengers, had been hijacked. The aircraft for Paris with an intermediate stop in Seven minutes out of Athens, the diverted to Benghazi, Libya, where it Athens. Airport security in Athens was German man forced his way onto refueled and took off again at 9:50 p.m. notoriouslyA lax. No one was on duty the flight deck while his companions One of the passengers, a woman, faked a at the metal detector, and the official took over the passenger cabins. They medical emergency and managed to talk checking carry-on luggage at the X-ray declared the hijacking to be on behalf her way off the airplane in Benghazi and machine was not watching the screen. of the Popular Front for the Liberation escape the hijackers. Four passengers from a connecting of Palestine and forced the pilot, Capt. The Airbus landed at Entebbe airport flight from Bahrain—a German man and Michel Bacos, to turn southward. in Uganda at 3:15 a.m. on Monday. On 62 AIR FORCE Magazine / December 2010 Entebbe board, in addition to the four hijack- new terminal and runway were built demands, broadcast over Ugandan ers, were 243 passengers and the Air in the early 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • מחלקת שפות זרות/FA & Defence/3953
    c. Method As proposed by the Chairman, the task was given to the Sub-Committee for Intelligence and the Secret Services, comprising six members of the Knesset. The members of the committee are: MK Yuval Steinitz – chair, MK Ehud Yatom, MK David Levy, MK Haim Ramon, MK Eli Yishai and MK Ilan Leibovitch. MK Danny Yatom, who was replaced in the course of the committee’s work as part of the rotation of members of the Labor faction in the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, also contributed to the work of the committee at the beginning. Mr. Shabtai Shavit – a former head of the Mossad - served as a consultant to the committee. The committee takes this opportunity to thank him for his significant contribution. The senior professional assistant of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Colonel (res.) Shmuel Letko, served as the secretary of the committee. The work of the committee was closely accompanied by the incoming Director-General of the Committee, R. Admiral (res.) Avriel Bar-Joseph, and by the outgoing Director-General of the Committee, Mr. Baruch Friedner, who was also given the task of writing the report. The Committee began its work in July 2003 and completed it recently. The Committee held some 30 plenum sessions and scores of smaller work meetings, in the course of which the following, inter alia, appeared before it: The Prime Minister, Mr. Ariel Sharon The Minister of Defense, Mr. Shaul Mofaz The Deputy Minister of Defense, Mr. Zeev Boim The Chief-of-Staff, Lieutenant General Moshe (Boogy) Ya'alon The Head of Military Intelligence, Major-General Aharon (Farkash) Zeevi 13 The Head of the Mossad, Major-General (res.) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Address to the Knesset on the Inaugural Event of The
    ADDRESS TO THE KNESSET ON THE INAUGURAL EVENT OF THE EUROPEAN FORUM OF THE KNESSET Mr. President of the Knesset, Mr. Ministers of the Israeli Government and Parliament members, honorable Yohanan Plesner, and European Friends of Israel that worked hard for this event, SHALOM and Zaohoraim tovim. Ani Moda ve mitrageshet. It is for me an honor and a great emotion to be hosted by Knesset Israel on this important occasion. I know and I love this place from my activity as a journalist and a writer. I love its walls, its square Greek shapes and ambitions, the faces of Ben Gurion, Golda, Moshe Dayan and Yigal Alon on the green walls in the entrance, and the white shirts without tie that you could always meet in this institution. I love its history at peace and at war. It’s for me and for all the world a valorous outstanding symbol of enduring democracy in the middle of the most overwhelming difficulties. I would like to thank MK Yohanan Plesner for inviting me, and with him all the very efficient staff of the new born European Forum of the Knesset (EFK), in particular Meital Goor and Michel Gourary of the European Friends of Israel. I would like to thank President Rubi Rivlin for welcoming us, all the Ambassadors in particular Mr. Davide La Cecilia from the Italian Embassy. I bring the regards of the President of my Parliament Mr. Gianfranco Fini to Mr. Rivlin personally and to you all. It is extremely important that the Knesset has instituted a group aimed at strengthening the relations with European Parliaments.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and US Relations
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations (name redacted) Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs June 1, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33476 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Since Israel’s founding in 1948, successive U.S. Presidents and many Members of Congress have demonstrated a commitment to Israel’s security and to maintaining close U.S.-Israel cooperation. Common perceptions of shared democratic values and religious affinities have contributed to the strong bilateral ties. The question of Israel’s security regularly influences U.S. policy considerations regarding the Middle East, and Congress provides active oversight of executive branch dealings with Israel and other actors in the region. Israel is a leading recipient of U.S. foreign aid and a frequent purchaser of major U.S. weapons systems. By law, U.S. arms sales cannot adversely affect Israel’s “qualitative military edge” over other countries in its region. The two countries signed a free trade agreement in 1985, and the United States is Israel’s largest trading partner. Israel has many regional security concerns and aligning U.S. and Israeli policies to address these concerns has presented persistent challenges. By voicing criticism of international diplomacy on Iran’s nuclear program, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu may seek to give Israel a voice in an ongoing negotiating process in which it does not directly participate. As a June 2015 deadline nears for a comprehensive international agreement on the issue, Israel apparently seeks material assurances that the United States will bolster its regional security standing and self-defense capabilities. In addition to concerns over Iran, Israel’s perceptions of security around its borders have changed since 2011 as several surrounding Arab countries have experienced political upheaval.
    [Show full text]
  • 20141116 Herzliya ME WMD Report
    Pugwash Workshop on “The Unchangeable Middle East” Herzliya, Israel 14-15 November 2014 MAIN POINTS: • The ISIS/Daesh threat has emerged as the most serious threat to regional stability given its penetration into Iraq and Syria. Although it does not explicitly focus on Israel, as it now stands there is concern as it nears the northern border of Israel. • The extremism of the ISIS/Daesh movement has perversely weakened the perceived extremism of other radical movements in the Middle East such as Hizbollah and Hamas. • Although it appears that a deal on the Iran nuclear issue is close, there is still significant difference over what constitutes a good deal from Israeli perspectives; concern persists over breakout, possible military dimensions to Iran’s past nuclear activities, and verification. However, there is the risk of torpedoing a reasonable deal on these grounds. • The ramifications of a deal on the Iranian nuclear issue include a possible regional problem of technological proliferation in other states, as well as concerns over emboldening Iran to act through proxies vis-à-vis Israel. On the flipside, it was pointed out a deal could help bring Iran on board with action to be taken against Daesh. • Some consider that the major threat to Israel today has become the decline of Israel’s status in international public opinion, particularly in the wake of the most recent Gaza war. • There has been a predominant Israeli narrative that has been sold very well, and it is continued today, that there is no partner for peace on the Palestinian side. • The Israeli-Palestinian peace process does not really exist at this time, and the prospects for it being reinvigorated are slim.
    [Show full text]