Executive Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transport Approved Bangalore Metro Rail Project
PD 000038-IND November 20, 2017 PROJECT DOCUMENT OF THE ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK Republic of India Bangalore Metro Rail Project – Line R6 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without AIIB authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Effective as of July 25, 2017) Currency Unit – Indian rupee (INR) INR 1.00 = $0.0155 US$1.00 = INR 64.66 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AFC Automatic Fare Collection AFD Agence Française de Développement AIIB or the Bank Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank ATL Average Trip Length BDA Bangalore Development Authority BMRCL Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited BMTC Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation CAAA Controller of Aid Accounts and Audit C&AG Comptroller and Auditor General CATC Continuous Automatic Train Control System CDP Comprehensive Development Plan CTTP Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Plan for Bengaluru DEA Department of Economic Affairs DMC Driving Motor Car DMRC Delhi Metro Rail Corporation DPR Detailed Project Report E&M Electrical and Mechanical ECS Environment Control System EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIB European Investment Bank EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return ENPV Economic Net Present Value ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan ESP Environmental and Social Policy FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return GDP Gross Domestic Product GfP Guidelines for Procurement GHG Greenhouse Gas GoI Government of India -
Before the National Green Tribunal (Sz) at Chennai Dairy No
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (SZ) AT CHENNAI DAIRY NO. 64/2019 (SZ) IN APPEAL NO. 08/2020 BETWEEN: ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT GROUP & ANOTHER ... APPELLANTS Vs. KARNATAKAROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS INDEX -SL Particulars Page No. No. 1. Counter Statement to the Appeal filed under Section 18( I) read with Sections I6(h) of the National Green Tribunal Act, 20 I0; 1-67 2. Annexure-Rl - Copy of the Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Plan for Bangalore 2011; 68-269 3. Annexure-R2 - Copy of the study conducted on congestion costs incurred on Indian Roads by IIT Madras; 270-283 4. Annexure-R3 - Copy of the paper dated 14/11/2017 titled 'The Welfare effect of Road Congestion pricing : Experimental 284-356 Evidence and Equilibrium Implications'; 5. Annexure-R4 - Copy of the data collected by Gabriel E Kreindler; 357-364 6. Annexure-RS - Copy of the News report of Times of India dated 06/01/2017; 365-368 7. Annexure-R6 (Series) - Copy of news paper reports; 369-384 8. Annexure-R7 - Copy of the detailed study conducted by the Respondent No. I; 385-386 9. Annexure-R8 - Copy of the study report on the Urban CO2 emissions in the city of Xi' an and Bangalore; 387-413 414-425 426-686 687-1031 Page 1 of 1031 Page 2 of 1031 Page 3 of 1031 Page 4 of 1031 Page 5 of 1031 Page 6 of 1031 Page 7 of 1031 Page 8 of 1031 Page 9 of 1031 Page 10 of 1031 Page 11 of 1031 Page 12 of 1031 Page 13 of 1031 Page 14 of 1031 Page 15 of 1031 Page 16 of 1031 Page 17 of 1031 Page 18 of 1031 Page 19 of 1031 Page 20 of 1031 Page 21 of 1031 -
Transport Department Annual Report of the Transport Department for the Year 2016-17
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 1. INTRODUCTION The Department of Transport was constituted by Government Order No.T6811:6865 RT :53-54:10 Dated 03-03-1955 vide Notification 4285 -98 MV-23-56-57 Da ted 27 -08-1956. Then it was named as Motor Vehicles Department. Thereafter, the Department was re-named as TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT. The primary thrust areas of the Department are enforcement of Motor Vehicles Act and Rules and collection of Tax . Road Transport is no more the domain of public sector. Private sector has emerged as a strong force in providing efficient transport facilities throughout the Nation. The Department is mainly responsible for regulation of the use of Motor Vehicles in the State and collection of tax on Motor Vehicles, Road Safety, Control of Air and Noise pollution in accordance with the provisions of the following Acts and Rules: 1. The Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (Central Act 59 of 1988) 2. Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 3. The Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 4. The Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act 1957 (Karnataka Act 35 of 1957) 5. The Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1957. 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP 2.1 Commissioner for Transport and Road Safety is the head of the department and he is assisted by the following officers at the head quarters. 1. Additional Commissioner for Transport (Administration) 2. Additional Commissioner for Transport ( Enforcement South) 3. Additional Commissioner for Transport and Secretary, KSTA 4. Joint Commissioner for Transport ( Environment & E-Governance) 5. Legal Adviser 6. -
Towards a Discussion of Support to Urban Transport Development in India Public Disclosure Authorized
Towards a discussion of support to Urban Transport development in India Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Energy & Infrastructure Unit South Asia Region March 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. ACRONYMS BDA Bangalore Development Authority BMC Bangalore Municipal Corporation BMTC Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation BMRTL Bangalore Mass Rapid Transit Ltd CMA Chennai Metropolitan Area CMDA Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority CMC Chennai Municipal Corporation CMTC Chennai Metropolitan Transport Corporation CTTS Chennai Traffic and Transport Study (1995) KRDCL Karnataka Road Development Corporation Ltd KUIFDC Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation LRT Light-rail Transit MTC Metropolitan Transport Corporation MRTS Mass Rapid Transit System (Chennai urban railway) TM Traffic Management T&PM Traffic and Parking Management TNUDF Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund UTP Urban Public Transport CONTENTS Page PREFACE ............................................................................................................................... i How significant is the urban transport problem in India?................................................... 1 What is the Government of India policy response to the Urban Transport problem? ........ 2 What -
Comprehensive Comprehensive Traffic And
<< KARNATAKA URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCE CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFICAND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR BANGALORE OCTOBER 2007 RITES Ltd (A Government of India Enterprise) Comprehensive Traffic & Transportation Plan for Bangalore Table of Contents Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Plan for Bangalore TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER ––– 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL BACKGROUND 1.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 1.3 DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 1.4 TRANSPORT NETWORK 1.5 GROWTH OF MOTOR VEHICLES 1.6 THE BANGLORE METROPOLITAN REGION 1.7 URBAN LAND USE STRUCTURE FOR BMA 1.8 BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHROITY (BMICAPA) 1.9 EARLIER STUDIES 1.10 NEED FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE TRAFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN CHAPTER ––– 2 STUDY OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY 2.1 STUDY GOALS 2.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 2.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 2.4. STUDY METHODOLOGY CHAPTER ––– 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC AND TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.2 PRIMARY TRAFFIC AND TRAVEL SURVEYS 3.3 TRAFFIC ZONE DELINEATION 3.4 ZONAL POPULATION 3.5 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 3.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS RITES Ltd. Page 1 of 8 Comprehensive Traffic & Transportation Plan for Bangalore Table of Contents 3.7 PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 3.8 PARKING CHARACTERISTCS 3.9 SPEED & DELAY STUDY 3.10 PUBLIC TRANSPORT SURVEY 3.11 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 3.12 ROAD ACCIDENTS 3.13 PROBLEMS AND ISSUES CHAPTER ––– 4 DEVELOPMEDEVELOPMENTNT OF OPERATIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL -
Urban Mobility Regulatory Reforms in India April 2019
URBAN MOBILITY REGULATORY REFORMS IN INDIA APRIL 2019 SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FOUNDATION MP Ensystems Advisory Private Limited Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation Report on “Urban Mobility Regulatory Reform in India”. Citation: Mahesh Patankar, Ira Prem, MP Ensystems Advisory (2019) About MP Ensystems MP Ensystems Advisory Private Limited (www.mpensystems.com) is a niche energy and environmental sector consultancy and advisory firm providing a bridge between policy-making and clean energy project implementation About Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation works to strengthen the energy security of India by aiding the design and implementation of policies that support renewable energy, energy efficiency and sustainable transport solutions. Disclaimer The views and analysis expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation. The Foundation also does not guarantee the accuracy of any data included in this publication nor does it accept any responsibility for the consequences of its use. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 4 Project Team .............................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ -
Transitioning Towards a Green Economy in Karnataka
Transitioning towards a Green Economy in Karnataka Transitioning towards a Green Economy in Karnataka Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy December 2014 © December 2014 This report forms deliverables of the project initiated by the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) and the Bangalore Climate Change Initiative-Karnataka (BCCI-K) with its consortium partners: Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP, Bengaluru), Indian Institute of Science (IISc, Bengaluru), University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS, Bengaluru), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC, Bengaluru), Integrated Natural Resource Management (INRM, New Delhi) and the London School of Economics-India Observatory (LSE- IO, London). Published by Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy #18, 10th Cross, Mayura Street, Papanna Layout, Nagashettyhalli, RMV II Stage, Bengaluru – 560094 Tel: +91 (80) 6690-2500 Fax: +91 (80) 2351-4269 http://www.cstep.in/ Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure the correctness of data/information used in this report, neither the authors nor CSTEP accept any legal liability for the accuracy or inferences drawn from the material contained therein or for any consequences arising from the use of this material. No part of this report may be disseminated or reproduced in any form (electronic or mechanical) without prior permission from or intimation to BCCI-K. Permission and information may be sought at [email protected]. All such reproduced information must be duly credited. Team Members Nihit Goyal Mohd. Sahil Ali Shweta Srinivasan Dr. Sharath Chandra Rao Dr. Amit Kanudia Dr. Anshu Bharadwaj Dr. Anshu Bharadwaj Executive Director Center for Study of Science, Technology & Policy Foreword India’s present emissions are about 2,000 million tonnes, 1.5 tonnes per capita, well below those of the U.S. -
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Bengaluru
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Bengaluru TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Description Page Nos. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... I-XVIII 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Sustainable Mobility Principles ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1 Access .................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.2 People and Communities .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3 Environmental Quality .............................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.4 Economic Viability .................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Impact of Regional/National Framework ....................................................................... 1-4 1.2.1 National Framework ................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.2 Regional Framework ................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3 National Urban Transportation Policy (NUTP) ................................................................ 1-7 1.4 Delineation of Planning Area ....................................................................................... -
World Bank Document
Urban Transport in Chennai and Bangalore Public Disclosure Authorized Energy & Infrastructure Unit Public Disclosure Authorized South Asia Region March 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank This report was written by Slobodan Mitric, Urban Transport Specialist (consultant). Isabel Chatterton, Financial Specialist (SASEI) contributed to the Chennai case study. The task leadership was shared by Zhi Liu, K. Mukundan and A.K. Swaminathan (SASEI). Guang Zhe Chen is the Transport Sector Manager in SASEI and Vincent Public Disclosure Authorized Gouarne is the SASEI Director. ACRONYMS BDA Bangalore Development Authority BMC Bangalore Municipal Corporation BMTC Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation BMRTL Bangalore Mass Rapid Transit Ltd CMA Chennai Metropolitan Area CMDA Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority CMC Chennai Municipal Corporation CMTC Chennai Metropolitan Transport Corporation CTTS Chennai Traffic and Transport Study (1995) KRDCL Karnataka Road Development Corporation Ltd KUIFDC Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation LRT Light-rail Transit MTC Metropolitan Transport Corporation MRTS Mass Rapid Transit System (Chennai urban railway) TM Traffic Management T&PM Traffic and Parking Management TNUDF Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund UTP Urban Public Transport TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. i 1. OBJECTIVES AND CONTENT OF THE REPORT....................................................... -
Page 172 of 1031 Comprehensive Traffic & Transportation Plan for Bangalore Chapter 6 –Future Demand Analysis and System Selection
Page 172 of 1031 Comprehensive Traffic & Transportation Plan for Bangalore Chapter 6 –Future Demand Analysis and System Selection assignments (followed by skims for next iteration). It was found that to achieve convergence, eight iterations were required. 6.2.36.2.36.2.3 The Do-minimum assignment was carried out to identify the bottlenecks, over capacity links etc. With this it is possible to identify the major constraints in the network. Once the constraints are identified it is easy to formulate schemes to overcome the problems. New infrastructure, traffic management plans, and policy controls can be worked out with the help of identified schemes. The calibrated deterrence functions for various modes and various purposes have been adopted. Forecast test of each scheme will be assessed against the Do- Minimum assignment. 6.2.46.2.46.2.4 For the Do Minimum Scenario, the expected modal split for the year 2025 is given in Table 6.1Table 6.1.6.1 This table shows that the modal split in favour of public/mass transport will fall to about 29% by 2025 against base year modal split of 47%. Share of trips by personalized motor vehicles such as car and two wheelers is expected to increase from 40% to 60%. This is expected to increase the traffic volumes on the most of the road network beyond its capacity. The desireline diagram for private vehicles for 2025 is shown in FigureFigure 6.16.1. Peak hour traffic assignment on the road network is shown in Figure 6.26.2.6.2 These figures indicate heavy radial movements to the core of the city and also circumferential movements. -
Best Practices in Urban Transport
Best Practices in Urban Transport Report Prepared by Institute of Urban September, 2013 Transport (India) Best Practices in Urban Transport Acknowledgements This study has been undertaken by a team led by Ms Kanika Kalra, (Urban Transport Expert, IUT) with support from Ms Anindita Ghosh (Transport Planner, IUT) and Mr Daniel Kriske (Intern-April- July 2013, IUT). The team is thankful to Mr BI Singh (Director General, IUT) for his constant guidance and support and very important source of inspiration and mentor for the conduct of this study. The team would like to thank all the stakeholders for their constant assistance in providing information about the projects, data on urban transport, as well as granting in-person interviews. In addition, this study draws reference from various documents like Comprehensive Mobility Plans, toolkits prepared by The World Bank, UNDP, SUTP and Asian Development Bank. IUT offers its sincere gratitude for allowing such integral material to form one of the core bases of this study. i Best Practices in Urban Transport Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgement …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...i 2. Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................1 3. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……….. 7 4. Objectives………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...7 5. Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....8 6. Organization of Report……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 7. -
Minimum Wages for Domestic Work Mirroring Devalued Housework
REVIEW OF WOMEN’S STUDIES Minimum Wages for Domestic Work Mirroring Devalued Housework Neetha N Apart from labour market issues that govern legislative n the neo-liberal era not much is expected from the state interventions, a critical factor in understanding the towards protecting the interests of the working class. How- ever, the neglect and apathy of the state to issues related to responses of the state to the issues domestic workers I domestic workers has a much longer history. A cursory look at face is the social understanding of household work. the long list of various attempts to regulate the sector clearly Minimum wages for domestic workers in the few states reveals this (Neetha and Palriwala 2011). The central reasons where it is mandated are among the lowest in the that are often cited for the reluctance of the state to regulate the sector are the location of work and the informal employment informal sector, reflecting the undervaluation of relations that characterise it. Domestic work is carried out in housework even when it enters the market. Better private households. Thus, the legal view that abjures the rec- statutory minimum wages for domestic workers would ognition of the home as a workplace explains the absence of not only help protect their rights, but could also shake labour regulations in the sector. Domestic workers are ex- cluded from the coverage of many core labour laws as they do the social and political foundations of household work, not qualify under the defi nitions of “workmen”, “employer”, or leading to a new valuation of it.