City of Bayswater) Cr Filomena Piffaretti (Local Government Member, City of Bayswater)

Metro Central Joint Development Assessment Panel Agenda

Meeting Date and Time: 23 October 2019, 9:00 AM Meeting Number: MCJDAP/369 Meeting Venue: Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage 140 William Street Perth

Attendance

DAP Members

Ms Megan Adair (Presiding Member) Ms Rachel Chapman (Deputy Presiding Member) Mr Michael Hardy (Specialist Member) Cr Catherine Ehrhardt (Local Government Member, City of Bayswater) Cr Filomena Piffaretti (Local Government Member, City of Bayswater)

Officers in attendance

Mr Remajee Narroo (City of Bayswater) Ms Helen Smith (City of Bayswater) Mr Mark Short (City of Bayswater)

Minute Secretary

Ms Zoe Hendry (DAP Secretariat)

Applicants and Submitters

Mr Nik Hidding (Peter Webb & Associates) Mr Brendan Foley (Thomson Geer Lawyers)

Members of the Public / Media

Nil

1. Declaration of Opening

The Presiding Member declares the meeting open and acknowledges the traditional owners and pay respects to Elders past and present of the land on which the meeting is being held.

2. Apologies

Nil

3. Members on Leave of Absence

Nil

Version: 2 Page 1

4. Noting of Minutes

Signed minutes of previous meetings are available on the DAP website.

5. Declarations of Due Consideration

Any member who is not familiar with the substance of any report or other information provided for consideration at the DAP meeting must declare that fact before the meeting considers the matter.

6. Disclosure of Interests

Nil

7. Deputations and Presentations

7.1 Mr Brendan Foley (Thomson Geer Lawyers) presenting in support of the application at Item 9.1. The presentation will address legal submission on deficiencies in Policy and RAR.

The City of Bayswater may be provided with the opportunity to respond to questions of the panel, as invited by the Presiding Member.

8. Form 1 – Responsible Authority Reports – DAP Applications

Nil

9. Form 2 – Responsible Authority Reports – Amending or cancelling DAP development approval

9.1 Property Location: No.34 (Lot 9) Jackson Street, Bayswater Development Description: Proposed Service Station with Associated Convenience Store and Two Fast Food Outlets Additions to Existing Concrete Recycling Facility Proposed Amendment: Review of Conditions 4 and 11 of the Development Approval Applicant: Peter Webb & Associates Owner: Horizon 73 Pty Ltd and 2XT Pty Ltd Salvatore Mangione and Mr Tomo Mangione Responsible Authority: City of Bayswater DAP File No: DAP/18/01492

Version: 2 Page 2

10. Appeals to the State Administrative Tribunal

Current Applications LG Name Property Location Application Description City of Melville Nos. 10, 12 & 14 (Lots 311, 20 Storey Mixed-Use Development 800 & 801) Forbes Road comprising 97 Multiple Dwellings, and Nos. 40A, 40B & 40C 15 Short Stay Accommodation (Lots 802, 803 & 804) Units and 5 Non-Residential Kishorn Road, Applecross tenancies (Office, Restaurant, Shop and 2 Co-Working Spaces) City of South Lots 2-20 (72-74) Mill Point 36 Level (118.2m) Mixed Use Perth Road, South Perth Development City of South Lots 29-31 (50-52) Melville 31 Level (103.1m) Mixed Use Perth Parade, South Perth Development City of South Lot 220 (464) Canning 3-Storey Office Building Perth Highway, Como redevelopment plus Basement Parking with 2 Large Format Digital Signs (Advertisement) City of South Lots 81 and 82 (No.31) Mixed use development comprising Perth Labouchere Road and Lot commercial and residential land 12 (No.24) Lyall Street, uses (41 Storey) (next to Perth South Perth Zoo) City of South Lot 4 (No. 3) Lyall Street 43-Storey Mixed Development Perth and Lot 11 (No. 56) Melville Parade, South Perth

11. General Business / Meeting Closure

In accordance with Section 7.3 of the DAP Standing Orders 2017 only the Presiding Member may publicly comment on the operations or determinations of a DAP and other DAP members should not be approached to make comment.

Version: 2 Page 3

Form 2 – Responsible Authority Report (Regulation 17)

Property Location: No.34 (Lot 9) Jackson Street, Bayswater Development Description: Proposed Service Station with Associated Convenience Store and Two Fast Food Outlets Additions to Existing Concrete Recycling Facility Proposed Amendments: Review of Conditions 4 and 11 of the Development Approval DAP Name: Metro Central JDAP Applicant: Nik Hidding- Peter Webb & Associates Owner: Horizon 73 Pty Ltd 2XT Pty Ltd Value of Amendment: $ 2.2 million LG Reference: DA18-0430.01 Responsible Authority: Local Government - City of Bayswater Authorising Officer: Manager Development Approvals DAP File No: DAP/18/01492 Report Date: 6 September 2019 Application Received Date: 18 July 2019 Application Process Days: 37 days Attachment(s): 1. Previous Determination Notice 2. Location Plan 3. Applicant's Submission 4.Helliwell Assessment 5.City's Policy Trees on Private Land and Street Verges 6.Urban Tree Policy 7.City's Fees and Charges

Officer Recommendation:

That the Metro Central JDAP resolves to:

1. Accept that the DAP Application reference DAP/18/01492 as detailed on the DAP Form 2 dated 8 July 2019 is appropriate for consideration in accordance with regulation 17 of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011;

2. Approve the DAP Application reference DAP/18/01492 as detailed on the DAP Form 2 dated 8 July 2019 in accordance with Clause 68 of Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and the provisions of the City of Bayswater Town Planning Scheme No.24, for the proposed minor amendment to the approved Proposed Service Station with Associated Convenience Store and Two Fast Food Outlets Additions to Existing Concrete Recycling Facility at No.34 (Lot 9) Jackson Street, Bayswater subject to the following:

Amended Conditions

1. Condition 4 is maintained.

Page 1 2. Condition 11 is amended as follows:

No storage or display of goods is to occur outside the building except for an ice box, bagged wood, a gas cylinder storage cage and bottled water to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

New Conditions

15. All street tree(s) within the verge adjoining the subject property are to be retained, unless written approval has been granted by the City of Bayswater for their removal, and shall have measures consistent with AS 4970-2009 undertaken to ensure its/their protection during construction of the subject development to the satisfaction of the City, including but not limited to the following: (a) A minimum 2.0m radius tree protection zone (TPZ) shall be provided through 1.8m high fencing around the verge trees (chain mesh panels or other suitable material) during construction of the subject development. (b) The above fencing is not to be moved or removed at any period during construction, and this zone is not to be entered for any reason; signage notifying people of the TPZ and the associated requirements is to be placed on each side of the fencing. (c) All activities related to construction of the subject development, including parking of vehicles, storage of materials, and washing of concreting tools and equipment is prohibited within the designated TPZ. (d) Any roots identified to be pruned shall be pruned with a final cut to undamaged wood outside of the TPZ. Pruning cuts shall be made with sharp tools such as secateurs, pruners, handsaws or chainsaws. Pruning wounds shall not be treated with dressings or paints. It is not acceptable for roots to be ‘pruned’ with machinery such as backhoes or excavators. (e) The tree(s) shall be provided with supplemental water during any construction period falling over summer, with a minimum of 150 litres being provided per week. (f) Should any works be required to be undertaken within the TPZ, approval must be given by the City prior to entering this zone. You may be required to seek advice from an Arborist in regard to the type of works being undertaken, this information is to be assessed by the City as part of the approvals to enter. (g) Any new crossover shall maintain a minimum clearance of 2.0m from the base of a street tree(s). 16. Seven trees in a minimum 45 litre bag size to be planted on the verge along Collier Road and Jackson Street, the species and location shall be to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

Page 2 All other conditions and requirements detailed on the previous approval dated 20 March 2019 shall remain unless altered by this application.

Details: outline of development application

Zoning MRS: Industrial TPS: General Industry Use Class: Service Station 'D', Convenience Store 'D', Fast Food Outlets 'D' Strategy Policy: Not applicable Development Scheme: City of Bayswater Town Planning Scheme No. 24 Lot Size: 17,611m² Existing Land Use: Concrete Recycling Facility

The amended development application includes the review of the following planning conditions 4 and 11:

"4. Prior to the removal of the seven verge trees, the owner/applicant is to pay the City of Bayswater the amount of $22,320 as determined by the Helliwell Assessment undertaken by the City to compensate for the loss of amenity value provided by these trees. 11. No storage or display of goods is to occur outside the building, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater." Background:

The original Form 1 Development Assessment Panels (DAP) application was approved by the Joint Development Assessment Panels (JDAP) at its meeting held on 7 March 2019 subject to conditions (Attachment 1). The subject site is surrounded by existing industrial buildings and located on the corner of Collier Road and Jackson Street backing onto Tonkin Highway (Attachment 2).

Legislation and Policy

Legislation

• Planning and Development Act 2005; • Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; • City of Bayswater Town Planning Scheme No. 24.

Consultation:

Public Consultation

The amended application was not advertised.

Consultation with other Agencies or Consultants

Not applicable.

Page 3 Planning Assessment:

The applicant seeks the review of the following conditions:

"4. Prior to the removal of the seven verge trees, the owner/applicant is to pay the City of Bayswater the amount of $22,329 as determined by the Helliwell Assessment undertaken by the City to compensate for the loss of amenity value provided by these trees.

11. No storage or display of goods is to occur outside the building, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater."

The applicant has provided justification for the deletion of condition 4 and reconsideration of condition 11 as per Attachment 3 which includes the following:

Condition 4 • No copy of the Helliwell Assessment was provided to JDAP or the applicant. • Legal advice received by the applicant is that condition 4 does not have a proper planning purpose, has no nexus to the proposed development and therefore the condition is not valid. • There is no requirement to pay this amount of money given the trees are required to be removed for the following reasons: (a) To provide visibility to the two approved pylon signs from the street. (b) To construct new crossovers and provide sightlines for vehicles entering/exiting the site. (c) Some of the trees are not in good condition. (d) The trees can impact on the proposed driveway due to their location.

Condition 11 • It is common practice that service stations operators typically store and display goods such as ice, wood, gas bottles and water bottles outside the building. Therefore amendment to Condition 11 is sought to allow for this type of outdoor storage of goods outside building.

Officer Comments

Condition 4

A copy of the Helliwell Assessment was requested neither by the applicant nor by the JDAP prior to the application being considered. A copy of the Helliwell assessment is provided as per Attachment 4.

The City’s Town Planning Scheme No. 24, with the inclusion of the Helliwell valuation system looks to protect the City’s verge tree assets and deter their removal for the benefit of the community in order to maintain the many benefits that trees provide. The ultimate intent is to encourage applicants to look at using the available space on the verge to facilitate their needs and maintain trees in situ, whilst realising that trees not only hold great environmental value, but a monetary one too. The basis for this is to preserve canopy coverage loss and to increase canopy coverage by conditioning the planting of additional trees where sufficient space allows. The applicants design has a negative impact upon land which is not in their ownership or management, with the overall outcome for their own gain and/or profit. As such it is only reasonable that the City receive remuneration for the loss of its assets. The Helliwell system has

Page 4 basis for use within Town Planning Scheme 24, Trees on Private Land and Street Verges Policy (Attachment 5) and the Urban Tree Policy (refer to Attachment 6), with the system and base value multiplier publically advertised in the City’s Fees and Charges (Refer to Attachment 7). As such, the assessment Helliwell system is applicable to any applicant undertaking a development that adversely affects the City's tree assets. The money received will be used by the City as part of a budget item to meet the City's street planting program to plant new trees, to not only compensate for the loss of the 7 street verge trees but also to meet the City's Town Planning Scheme No.24 objective in creating a landscape environment which complements the wide range of activities carried on or proposed within the Scheme Area. In this instance it is considered Condition 4 has a proper planning purpose and has a nexus to the proposed development, therefore deletion of condition 4 is not supported.

With regard to the removal of trees to provide signage, crossovers, sightlines and driveway these items are associated with the development. It is also noted that the existing verge trees are considered to be in good condition. As such the verge trees are being forced to be removed due to this proposed development and as outlined above, it is reasonable that the City receive remuneration for the loss of its assets.

Condition 11

At its meeting held on 7 March 2019, the JDAP voted to delete condition 11 however due to a minuting oversight deletion of the condition was not followed through. In this instance the City recommends that condition 11 be amended so as to clarify its intent, consistent with JDAP member discussion at the above meeting, as follows:

"No storage or display of goods is to occur outside the building except for an ice box, bagged wood, a gas cylinder storage cage and bottled water to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater."

JDAP Meeting on 18 September 2019

JDAP at its meeting held on 18 September 2019 deferred its decision and requested the City to provide additional information with regard to the Helliwell assessment and verge trees.

The City provided the following information:

• The full Helliwell Assessment Report is attached - Attachment 4. The Helliwell system for tree amenity valuation was approved by Council at its meeting held on 15 May 2019 and is referenced in policies relating to Trees on Private Land and Street Verges and Urban Trees adopted pursuant to the City's Town Planning Scheme No.24. The Helliwell system and base value multiplier is also listed in the City’s Schedule of Fees and Charges. The Helliwell system may be applicable to applications proposing removal of the City's assets relating to street verge trees.

• The City has reviewed all the street trees along Jackson Street and Collier Road as indicated in the attached report. The trees shown as Nos. 1- 7 are recommended for removal due to the proposed crossovers for the development and the remaining trees are to be retained.

Page 5 The street trees coloured green in Attachment 4 were intended to be protected as they would not be significantly impacted by the proposed crossovers and could be retained. A condition was included in the officer's recommendation at the DAP meeting held on 7 March 2019 for verge trees to be retained. The DAP however resolved to remove this condition resulting in the approval being silent on retention of these trees. The City would be supportive of reinstating of the above condition to ensure protection of these two trees and also the street trees located at the corner of Jackson Street and Collier Road. The applicant also provided the following comments: "I confirm we are happy to keep the two redgums as noted in green at Attachment 4 but want to remove all other verge trees, and do not currently accept the Heliwell assessment.We are also mindful of sightlines and visibility to pylon sign. Therefore, the two trees should be pruned appropriately." The City is willing to undertake appropriate pruning of the two river redgum trees after all construction works on the property are completed. • The City does not have any records of planting of the existing verge trees. Notwithstanding, any trees within the verge area are assets of the City irrespective of the party which planted them.

• The City recommends two new conditions as outlined in the Officer's Recommendation for verge trees to be retained and landscaping of the Jackson Street and Collier Road verges with mature trees.

Conclusion:

In view of the above, it is recommended that condition 4 be maintained, condition 11 be amended and two new conditions for the verge trees as outlined above.

Page 6

LG Ref: DA18-0430 DAP Ref: DAP/18/01492 Enquiries: (08) 6551 9919

Mr Nik Hidding Peter Webb & Associates PO Box 920 SUBIACO WA 6904

Dear Mr Hidding

METRO CENTRAL JDAP - CITY OF BAYSWATER - DAP APPLICATION - DA18- 0430 - DETERMINATION

Property Location: No.34 (Lot 9) Jackson Street, Bayswater Application Details: Proposed Service Station with Associated Convenience Store and Two Fast Food Outlets Additions to Existing Concrete Recycling Facility

Thank you for your Form 1 Development Assessment Panel (DAP) application and plans submitted to the City of Bayswater on 21 September 2018 for the above- mentioned development.

This application was considered by the Metro Central JDAP at its meeting held on 7 March 2019, where in accordance with the provisions of the City of Bayswater Town Planning Scheme No.24, it was resolved to approve the application as per the attached notice of determination.

Should the applicant not be satisfied by this decision, an application may be made to amend or cancel this planning approval in accordance with regulation 17 and 17A of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011.

Please also be advised that there is a right of review by the State Administrative Tribunal in accordance with Part 14 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. Such an application must be made within 28 days of the determination, in accordance with the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004.

Should you have any queries with respect to the conditions of approval, please contact Mr Remajee Narroo on behalf of the City of Bayswater on 9272 0638.

Yours sincerely,

DAP Secretariat

20 March 2019

Encl. DAP Determination Notice Approved Plans

Cc: Mr Remajee Narroo City of Bayswater

Postal address: Locked Bag 2506 Perth WA Street address: 140 William Street Perth WA 6000 Tel: (08) 6551 9919 Fax: (08) 6551 9961 TTY: 6551 9007 Infoline: 1800 626 477 [email protected] www.dplh.wa.gov.au ABN 68 565 723 484 Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019

Planning and Development Act 2005

City of Bayswater Town Planning Scheme No.24

Metro Central Joint Development Assessment Panel

Determination on Development Assessment Panel Application for Planning Approval

In accordance with regulation 8 of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011, the above application for planning approval was granted on 7 March 2019, subject to the following:

1. Approve DAP Application reference DAP/18/01492 and accompanying plans in accordance with Clause 68 of Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and the provisions of the City of Bayswater Town Planning Scheme No.24, subject to the following conditions:

Conditions

1. The development shall be carried out only in accordance with the terms of the application as approved herein, and any approved plan.

2. Revised plan(s) addressing the following matters shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Bayswater prior to the lodgement of a building permit application, and not result in any greater variation to the requirements of the City's policies:

(a) The proposed monolith sign adjacent to Collier Road to have a maximum height of 9m and width of 2.01m.

(b) The proposed landscaping shall be a minimum 10 per cent of the site area.

3. Prior to the submission of a Building Permit the following are required to be provided:

(a) The owner, or the applicant on behalf of the owner, shall comply with the City of Bayswater policy relating to Percent for Public Art, and provide public art with a minimum value of 1% or ($22,000) of the estimated total construction cost of the development ($2.2 million). Details of the public art, including plans of the artwork, its cost and construction, and other matters relating to the artwork's on-going maintenance and acknowledgements in accordance with the City's Percent for Public Art Policy shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the lodgement of a building permit application.

Page 1 of 6

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019

Alternatively, the owner/applicant could choose cash-in-lieu of public art option. The cash-in-lieu amount is to be no less than 1% of the estimated total construction cost of the development and is to be paid to the City prior to submission of a Building Permit application in accordance with the City's Percent for Public Art Policy. If the applicant chooses this option then detailed plans for the installation of the artwork will not be required;

(b) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Bayswater. For the purpose of this condition, the plan shall be drawn with a view to reduce large areas of hard stand in passive areas and show the following: i. The location and species of all trees and shrubs to be retained or removed. ii. The size and number of new plants to be planted. iii. The location of any lawn areas to be established. iv. Those areas to be reticulated or irrigated. v. 23 trees and associated growth zone as denoted on the plans are to be provided within the lot. A minimum pot size of 35 litres is to be provided for the trees. An arborist report is to be submitted to demonstrate that the growth zone will not be impacted by the vehicle access ways to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. vi. All trees are to be provided with a minimum of 1m radius tree growth zone. The tree species shall be to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. vii. Trees are to be provided within the northern landscaping strip facing Collier Road to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. viii. All landscaped areas shall be separated from vehicle access and parking areas through the use of walls, kerbing or bollards to enable the protection of the landscaping.

Landscaping, and reticulation shall be completed in accordance with the approved detailed landscape plan prior to occupation of the development and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

(c) A construction management plan, detailing how the construction of the development will be managed to minimise the impact on the surrounding area.

(d) A waste management plan to be provided to address the waste generation, storage, and collection and disposal method to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. The approved plan shall thereafter be implemented in its entirety to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. The bin storage area to be provided with wash down facilities, the compound must be well ventilated and located on level ground to enable servicing.

(e) A dust management plan is to be submitted to and approved by the City of Bayswater detailing prevention and control of dust in accordance with the Dust Control Guidelines produced by the Department of Environmental Protection, Department of Water and Environmental Regulation.

Page 2 of 6

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019

(f) An acoustic report is to be submitted to and approved by the City of Bayswater assessing the potential impact the development has on the surrounding amenity. The noise generated from the construction and operational activities is not to exceed the levels prescribed under the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.

(g) Outdoor lighting plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Bayswater. The outdoor lighting is to be designed, baffled and located to prevent any increase in light spill onto the adjoining properties. External lighting shall be directed away from sensitive zones to prevent light spill and glare.

(h) A detailed ‘Schedule of Colours and Materials’ shall be approved by the City of Bayswater. The proposed fence cladding shall be dark green colour to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

(i) Detailed plans of a drainage system shall be submitted to and approved by the City. The plans shall include the following: i. All stormwater and drainage runoff retained onsite and to be provided and maintained to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. ii. An adequate bunding/drainage system is required to prevent fuel and oil from discharging into the stormwater system and must be directed towards a full retention separator for treatment. The approved plans shall be implemented and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater and the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation.

(j) A septic tank application is to be submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Health (Treatment of sewage and disposal of effluent and liquid waste) regulations 1974.

(k) An environmental health report submitted to and approved by the City of Bayswater demonstrating that the onsite effluent disposal system is suitable for that property. The applicant to provide an amended plan to include the onsite effluent disposal system and other liquid waste system (including grease trap system) on the propose site plan that will work given the proposed location of the septic tanks will not be suitable.

(l) Additional information is to be submitted to and approved by the City of Bayswater demonstrating how the existing concrete recycling facility operation will not impact on the proposed development. Any changes in the operation of the concrete recycling facility are to be reviewed and approved by the City of Bayswater.

(m) A geotechnical report covering the development area being prepared bya suitably qualified practitioner at the applicant’s cost, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. The report is to be lodged with the building permit application, together with certification from a structural engineer that the design is suitable for the site conditions as outlined in the geotechnical report. (n) Applicant demonstrating traffic measures including signage and line markings to minimise traffic conflicts between the users of the concrete recycling facility and the service station and fast food outlets to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

Page 3 of 6

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019

4. Prior to the removal of the seven verge trees, the owner/applicant is to pay the City of Bayswater the amount of $22,320 as determined by the Helliwell Assessment undertaken by the City to compensate for the loss of amenity value provided by these trees.

5. Prior to commencement of works, investigation for soil and ground water contamination is to be carried out to determine if remediation is required. If required remediation, including validation of remediation, of any contamination identified shall be completed prior to the development of the site to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater on advice from the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, to ensure that the site is suitable for the proposed use. Investigations and remediation are to be carried out in compliance with the Contaminated Sites Act 2003 and current Department of Water and Environmental Regulation contaminated sites guidelines.

6. Prior to the first occupation of the development the car parking area(s) on the subject land shall be sealed, drained, paved and line marked in accordance with the approved plans prior to the first occupation of the development and maintained thereafter by the owner(s)/occupier(s) to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

7. Windows, doors and adjacent areas fronting Jackson Street shall maintain an active and interactive relationship with the street, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

8. The signage hereby permitted shall not contain any flashing, moving or pulsating lighting, nor contain lighting that is distracting to road users, or interferes with traffic signals, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

9. Any illuminated signs on site shall have a maximum luminance in accordance with the following: (a) Daytime - 6000cd/m²; (b) Dawn/dusk - 600cd/m²; and (c) Night - 300cd/m²

10. All external fixtures, such as television antennas (of a non-standard type), radio and other antennas, satellite dishes, external hot water heaters, air conditioners, and the like, shall not be visible from the street, or designed integrally with the building and be located so as not to be visually obtrusive from the street.

11. No storage or display of goods is to occur outside the building, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

12. Walls, fences and other structures or vegetation shall be truncated or reduced to no higher than 0.75m within 1.5m of where a vehicular access point meets the road reserve.

13. All vehicle crossings being upgraded, designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

14. All advertising signs shall relate only to goods and services provided onsite.

Advice Notes

Page 4 of 6

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019

1. To activate the planning approval, the development/use subject of this approval must be substantially commenced within a period of two years of the date of this approval notice. If the development is not substantially commenced within this period, this approval shall lapse and be of no further effect. Where an approval has lapsed, no development/use shall be carried out without the further approval of the City having first been sought and obtained.

2. This approval is not a building permit or an approval under any other law than the Planning and Development Act 2005. It is the responsibility of the applicant/owner to obtain any other necessary approvals, consents and/or licenses required under any other law, and to commence and carry out development in accordance with all relevant laws.

3. This approval is not an authority to ignore any constraint to development on the land, which may exist through contract or on title, such as but not limited to an easement or restrictive covenant. It is the responsibility of the applicant/owner to investigate any such constraints before commencing development.

4. This approval does not authorise any interference with dividing fences, nor entry onto neighbouring land. Accordingly, should the applicant/landowner wish to remove or replace any portion of a dividing fence, or enter onto neighbouring land, the applicant/landowner must first come to a satisfactory arrangement with the adjoining property owner. Please refer to the Dividing Fences Act 1961.

5. The development shall comply with the Environmental Protection Act 1986, the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1911 and any relevant environmental protection or health regulations including but not limited to the following:  Environmental Protection (Liquid Waste) Regulation 1996;  Health Act 2016;  Health (Food Hygiene) Regulations 1993;  Health (Air handling and Water Systems) Regulations 1994;  Food Act 2008 and Australian Food Code;  Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997;  Treatment of Sewerage and Disposal of Effluent and Liquid Waste Amendment Regulations (No. 2) 1997.

6. Kerbs, roadways, footpaths, open drains, stormwater pits, service authority pits and verge areas must be adequately protected, maintained and reinstated if required, during and as a result of carting and all works associated with this development.

7. The applicant is required to submit a Building Permit to Water Corporation.

8. All food related areas (kitchen, preparation areas etc) to comply with the provisions of the Food Act 2008 and related code, regulations and guidelines.

9. In accordance with regulation 31(1)(c) of the Contaminated Sites Regulations 2006, a Mandatory Auditor's Report, prepared by an accredited contaminated sites auditor, will need to be submitted to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation. A current list of accredited auditors is available from www.dwer.wa.gov.au.

10. Fuel storage is to comply with the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Recovery of Vapours from the Transfer of Organic Liquids) Regulations 1995.

Page 5 of 6

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019

Management of stormwater and liquid wastes is to comply with the Water and Rivers Commission guidelines.

Where an approval has so lapsed, no development shall be carried out without further approval having first been sought and obtained, unless the applicant has applied and obtained Development Assessment Panel approval to extend the approval term under regulation 17(1)(a) of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011.

Page 6 of 6

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Date: Version 1, Version: ID: 3373271 Set Document

47.64

ACCESS RESTRICTION

51.17

364

85.31

ACCESS RESTRICTION

42.24

ALAN STREET

21.5

21.38 21.56 22.0 2.72

27.0

26.0

25.0 26.81

24.0 22.34 22.33 23.0 27.700.67

HIGH IRON SCREENING

21.27

22.61

21.17 21.39

21.25 35.45

27.74 26.19

8316 21.12 WATER CORPORATION EASEMENT 22.66

21.23 20.95 WATER MAIN

WATER CORP DRAIN 27.56 25.71 88.51

21.37

ROCK

21.51

21.27

27.45

HIGH IRON SCREENING IRON HIGH 25.32 21.44

25.36

25.42 20.84 21.18

21.24 27.98 25.23 21.59

21.27 21.46

PITCHING

22.36

CONCRETE

TOP 27.31

BUND 21.30 21.31

24.92 21.5 22.20 24.67 21.34 22.44 23.81 COLLIER ROAD

STREET SIGN

21.64 21.58 21.31 PROPOSED CANOPY 21.98 PROPOSED BUILDING

21.55 25.77 21.57

21.39 21.60 21.48 23.16 22.07 22.03

LINK MESH FENCE MESH LINK 24.64 22.0

TOWN OF BASSENDEAN 21.40

21.66 21.54 21.82

WEIGHBRIDGE LINK MESH FENCE 22.30 21.60 21.66 OFFICE

22.02

RELOCATED EXISTING

STRUCTURES TO BE 23.13 SUMP AND PUMP AND SUMP

24.19 21.41 21.62 22.25

2 22.14 21.62

21.84

DRAINAGE EASEMENT REMOVED PROPOSED CANOPY 21.49 21.58 22.63

21.63 21.57

TO BE 21.63 35.28

HARDIFENCE 23.46 21.61 21.79 22.44 22.38 CONCRETE WALL 21.63 21.61 21.67

Australia Ltd 21.82 Viva Energy 22.30

ACN 004 610 459

22.17 23.56 TRANSFORMER

23.46 POWER 22.05

22.24 POLE 22.16 22.28 22.15 CONCRETE WALL 22.34

F/H W/M 22.11 22.40 22.97

22.30 22.14 GATE

GATE HARDIFENCE 23.05

22.44

S/WM/H STREET 22.29 22.16 22.92

T MAIN WATER LINK MESH FENCE 71.72 22.30 T

SIGN

22.15 22.55 22.76 22.82

GULLY

22.41 22.30 22.17 22.25 22.40 22.61

22.34

22.15 22.09

GULLY 22.19 TO BE REMOVED TO BE RELOCATED TO BE RELOCATED

23.43 23.53 TO BE REMOVED HIGH MAST 22.61 22.95 LIGHT 22.37 22.35 22.43 STREET JACKSON 23.54 APPLICATION AREA = 0.8057 ha RPD LOT 9 ON DP33567 EASEMENT 6 LGA: CITY OF BAYSWATER LOT AREA = 1.7611 ha APPLICATION AREA = 0.8057 ha COLLIER ROAD /$1'6&$3,1*$5($ Pð PARKING SCHEDULE 32 CARPARKS PROVIDED 3 TRUCK PARKS PROVIDED ACCESS & ELECTRICAL EASEMENT

SITE BOUNDARY (27.98m) SITE BOUNDARY (25.77m) SITE BOUNDARY (35.45m)

(0.67m) (2.72m) 12m HIGH 2000 ILLUMINATED SITE BOUNDARY (35.28m)

PYLON SIGN 3314

SITE BOUNDARY (85.31m) SMALL TRUCK PARKING BAY "MAX 12.5m VEHICLE"

2000 8

2.6 x 5.4m LOT 9 CAR PARKING BAYS

OUTDOOR DINING PROPOSED

SITE BOUNDARY (47.64m) 17 18.0m WIDE

EASEMENT FOR ONE WAY EXIT CROSSOVER BIN PLANT FAST FOOD SEWER & WATER MAIN CROSSOVER STORE OUTLET LINE OF CANOPY TENANCY 2 OVER SHOWN G.F.A. Pð DASHED

FAST FOOD OUTLET TENANCY 1 DINING

G.F.A. Pð OUTDOOR 2.6 x 5.4m AIR & EXTENT OF CAR CAR WATER

EXISTING DELIVERIES PARKING CANOPY UNIT CRUSHER PLANT LARGE TRUCK BAYS Pð PARKING BAYS FFL 22.4 8 REFUELING BAYS

5m HIGH (NOT SUBJECT TO THIS DA, FOR INFORMATION ONLY) DISABLED ILLUMINATED

CAR BAY IN PYLON 1500 RELOCATED 12 CAR PARKING BAYS ACCORDANCE SIGN WITH 1428.1-2009 SERVICE STATION G.F.A. Pð SITE BOUNDARY (71.72m) 3000 BOLLARDS IN

FRONT OF JACKSON STREET COLORBOND SERVICE STATION FENCE SHEET 2700 (COLOUR TBA) SITE BOUNDARY (51.17m) 15400 8000 11376

PROPOSED 15.2m WIDE 4000 ONE WAY

ENTRANCE 15200 CROSSOVER CROSSOVER SITE BOUNDARY (42.24m)

PROPOSED TANK 6000 SITE BOUNDARY (88.51m) TRUCK CANOPY FARM TO BE ADVISED Pð 3 BAYS

15400 1600 THIS FUEL SHOWN DASHED POINT IS FOR LINE OF CANOPY OVER 11000 "MAX 19m VENT VEHICLE" PIPES

1500 FILL POINT 5400 LOCATION FILL POINT PROTECTION RR SIDE VIVA SIDE LEACH DRAINS ACCESS & RAIL 1800 ELECTRICAL 1800 SITE BOUNDARY (63.15m) EASEMENT DIVERTER 1500 SEPTIC TANKS

1200 SECTION A-A (NTS) NOTE: SEPTIC TO AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS (FENCE DIAGRAM TO ENGINEER DETAIL)

Viva Energy Australia Ltd ACN 004 610 459

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 NOTES: AREA SCHEDULE: COLOUR LEGEND: LEGEND ATG AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING (SIUC) WITH OPTIONAL 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR THE PURPOSES OF ILLUSTRATING VIVA ENERGY'S AREAS (APPROXIMATE): PRINTER & DISPLAY SCREEN. REFER FUEL & ELEC DESIGN INTENT ONLY. FRONT OF HOUSE 146.0 sqm CONVENIENCE DWGS. 2. THIS DRAWING WILL REQUIRE COMPLETE DETAILED DESIGN BACK OF HOUSE 132.0 sqm ATM AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE BY OTHERS. QBCC Lic. No. 1272165 DEVELOPMENT BY ALL RELEVANT DESIGN AND SERVICES DISCIPLINES AMENITIES 12.0 sqm COPYRIGHT © 2018 DO NOT SCALE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TOTAL GFA 290.0 sqm BCT SURFACE MOUNTED BABY CHANGE TABLE AS BACK OF HOUSE 3. THIS DRAWING WILL REQUIRE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED BOL BOLLARD. P NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CODE BY A REGISTERED BUILDING PERCENTAGE: P

A CERTIFYING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FRONT OF HOUSE 50% CCTV2 SECURITY MONITOR TYPE 2. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE. C

4. STAFF AREAS ARE NOT DISABLED ACCESSIBLE UNDER THE NATIONAL BACK OF HOUSE 46% D AMENITIES CH02 OFFICE CHAIR. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE G

C CONSTRUCTION CODE. VIVA ENERGY WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A LETTER AMENITIES 4% CLSK CLEANER'S SINK. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE. C STATING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THIS PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION. COM COMPUTER & SCREEN. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMS COMMS CABINET WITH PA SYSTEM. REFER ELEC DWGS. 23575 FC2 FILING CABINET TYPE 2. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE. FCB FROZEN CARBONATED BEVERAGE MACHINE. REFER 11739 1200 3400 6500 FF&E SCHEDULE STORE CLEANERS OFFICE FOOD PREP 3600 7050 9760 2393 FCC FORECOURT CONTROLLER. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE FREEZER COOLROOM CONSOLE / FOOD PREP FOOD PREP & FUEL & ELEC DWGS. FDCP FUEL DISPENSER CONTROL PANEL. REFER FUEL & ELEC DWGS. FR1 CLOSED UPRIGHT FRIDGE. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE.

FRY FRYER. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE. N

FZR 2 GLASS DOOR UPRIGHT FREEZER. REFER FF&E D

SCHEDULE E

SERVICE ACCESS DOOR M

HB1 HAND BASIN TYPE 1. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE. A HB2 HAND BASIN TYPE 2 - KNEE-OPERATED. REFER FF&E HWU OVER CCTV2 CABLE TRAY SCHEDULE.

HSC HYDROCARBON SENSOR CONTROLLER. REFER FEUL W

& ELEC DWGS. V

R HWU HOT WATER UNIT. REFER HYD DWGS.

HSC L N

MOD L LOCKERS. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE E

FRY E 2 PH3 CLSK C

FDCP FCC 8 MDF MAIN TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION BOARD BY OTHERS.

PRN COM I

WF COMMS R SHELVING FC2 F

F CLEANERS OV1 MOD MODEM. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE O

CH02

E SAF2 5 OV1 OVEN TYPE 1. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE.

3 SK U

R OV2 OVEN TYPE 2. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE.

OFFICE/SAFE 2

1 7 STORE

D T PH3 CORDLESS PHONE

2 1765 FOOD PREP

OV2 O HAVEN HB2 8 SHELVING

O PRN PRINTER. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE E

UNDER 0

ATG 2

/ CIGARETTES A MDF SAF1 SAFE TYPE 1 CHANGE MASTER COMPACT SAFE. 7

0 SHELVING / HB2 REFER FF&E SCHEDULE. 9

0 E SAF2 SAFE TYPE 2 OFFICE SAFE. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE.

1200 3

CIGARETTE CHUTE MENU BOARDS A

SK KITCHEN SINK. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE. S

O O WC WATER CLOSET TOILET SUITE. REFER FF&E

F MENU BOARDS D SCHEDULE.

7 E:\Documents\Charity\11245-m02_charity.guiao.rvt

F WF WATER FILTERS. REFER FF&E SCHEDULE

2 SHELVING

SHELVING E

3 SHELVING SHELVING

M CONSOLE 5 FOOD OFFER

0 R COOLROOM SAF1 UNDER FR1 UNDER

C O POS 1 POS 2 POS 3 COFFEE O FREEZER

C TENANCY

E ADJOINING

R ATM

F HOT AMB COLD SHELVING

2 FZR

1 1500 2000

CONDIMENTS L

3 ISSUED FOR

HB1 U

F FCB CHARGING / WIFI BENCH AMB WC PRELIMINARY

FCB S

SALES 3

1200 3797 1500 L

S WC GONDOLA GONDOLA GONDOLA GONDOLA INDOOR DINING REFRIGERATED DISPLAY CASE DISPLAY REFRIGERATED BCT 1553 1200 1200 1200

HB1 WASH STATION FULL SIZE @ A1 ACCESSIBLE S 6/07/2018 1:09:44 PM

TOILET 0

1 WC RECESSED

SHELF 6 OUTDOOR DINING ENTRY 1 a: Level 2, 21 Kyabra Street, Newstead, QLD 4006 PO Box 724, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 t: 07 3257 2755 MAIN ENTRY e: [email protected] 9685 1800 9165 w: www.cadway.com.au GLAZING ENTRY GLAZING co: Enviropacific Pty Ltd CL CL acn: 111 372 064 abn: 43 111 372 064 CL CL 1500 1250 project description TYP. PROPOSED BAYSWATER SERVICE STATION BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL BOL

project address 34 JACKSON STREET, BAYSWATER, WA 6053

client VIVA ENERGY AUSTRALIA LTD CARPARKING CARPARKING

drawing title CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN CANOPY LINK OVER CANOPY LINK OVER

1 : 50 @ A1 scale BOL CS drawn

11245 job no. 11245 SK009 0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m dwg no. 1:501:100 @ A3 A issue

Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 LEGEND ALS ALUMINIUM SCREEN QBCC Lic. No. 1272165 BOL BOLLARD. COPYRIGHT © 2018 DO NOT SCALE 3625 CANOPY LINK OVER CFC1 WALL CLADDING. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE SIGNAGE CFG COLORBOND FLASHING. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE CFS COLORBOND FASCIA. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE D3 WALL MOUNTED LED UP/DOWN LIGHT. REFER CG CG LIGHTING LEGEND. CG CG

SIGNAGE WITH POWER CKD APP LED1 CFC1 / P4 CFG CFS SUPPLY DP DOWNPIPE. REFER HYD DWGS AND FINISHES SCHEDULE TOP OF ROOF EG EAVES GUTTER. REFER HYD ENGR DETAIL AND 4350 FINISHES SCHEDULE FG FIXED GLAZING. REFER WINDOW SCHEDULE. LED1 LED1 LED1 LED LIGHTING. TYPE 1. REFER LIGHTING LEGEND. MS METAL SHEETING 800 SL SLIDING GLAZING. REFER DOOR SCHEDULE. SIGNAGE CEILING WT2 WALL TILES TYPE 2. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE. 3000 110 FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG SL SL FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG P4 PAINT FINISH. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE D3 D3 D3 CFG 4350 FINISHES SCHEDULE

ALS HI-LIGHT SS23/60 FIXED ALUMINIUM HORIZONTAL AMENDMENT

CFC1 3000 LOUVRES. POWDERCOATED TO MATCH COLORBOND / P4 GLAZING FGFG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG 'WINDSPRAY'. CFC1 JAMES HARDIE SCYON MATRIX WALL CLADDING PERSPECTIVES FOR APPROVAL VERTICAL 2990L x 1190W (CODE 404169). CFG LYSAGHT COLORBOND FLASHING. COLORBOND 'MONUMENT MATT'. GROUND FLOOR CFS LYSAGHT COLORBOND FASCIA. COLORBOND 0 'MONUMENT MATT'. CRS LYSAGHT COLORBOND TRIMDEK ROOF SHEETING. COLORBOND 'SURFMIST'. MS LYSAGHT COLORBOND LONGLINE 350 PROFILE. COLORBOND 'MONUMENT MATT'. P4 TAUBMANS ENDURE EXTERIOR PAINT WHITE LOW 1 EAST ELEVATION SHEEN. SK008 1 : 50 @ A1 P5 DULUX WEATHERSHIELD EXTERIOR SEMI-GLOSS. 'DOMINO'. WT2 TILESCOPE 'GLOSS WHITE' 100x300 BRICK BOND WALL BA 14/09/2018 REVISED CFC1 PAINT COLOUR 17/07/2018 ELEVATIONS & EXTERNAL

TILE. ISS DATE

C:\Users\achuyko\Documents\[email protected]

3500 3mm S/S WIRE SIGNAGE TRELLIS

275900 3500 SIGNAGE CFS CFS MS WT2 CFS CFG TOP OF ROOF 4350 2400 299 300

CFS 949 PROPOSED RETAIL TENANCY SIGNAGE PROPOSED RETAIL TENANCY SIGNAGE 600 600325 SIGNAGE SIGNAGE 50 CEILING 3000 FG FG FG FG FG 575 ISSUED FOR D3 D3

3605 FG FG FG FG 4224 PRELIMINARY

3000 WT2 WT2 2700

PLANTER

620 WT2 GROUND FLOOR 0

14/09/2018 3:06:24 PM FULL SIZE @ A1

OUTDOOR DINING BEHIND 2 EAST ELEVATION (CONTINUATION) a: Level 2, 21 Kyabra Street, SK008 1 : 50 @ A1 Newstead, QLD 4006 PO Box 724, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 t: 07 3257 2755 e: [email protected] w: www.cadway.com.au co: Enviropacific Pty Ltd CFS CANOPY LINK OVER acn: 111 372 064 abn: 43 111 372 064

3600 project description SIGNAGE PROPOSED BAYSWATER SERVICE STATION TOP OF ROOF 4350 MS CFG LED1 CFG MS .00° 4 CFG project address

EG 34 JACKSON STREET, DP CFS BAYSWATER, WA 6053 CEILING 3000 ALS 3mm S/S WIRE client LED1 LED1 TRELLIS VIVA ENERGY AUSTRALIA

1900 LTD SIGNAGE LED1 BOL drawing title PLANTER 100 BUILDING ELEVATIONS

WT2 SHEET 1 WT2 1000 GROUND FLOOR LOW WALL 0

1 : 50 @ A1 scale

CS drawn LED1 CFG LED1 LED1 SIGNAGE WITH POWER CFG CFC1 / P4 SUPPLY 11245 job no. 3 SOUTH ELEVATION SK008 1 : 50 @ A1 11245 SK010 dwg no. 0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m B issue 1:1001:50 @ A3 Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 LEGEND ALS ALUMINIUM SCREEN QBCC Lic. No. 1272165 BOL BOLLARD. COPYRIGHT © 2018 DO NOT SCALE OUTDOOR DINING CFS OPEN TO OUTDOOR DINING CFG COLORBOND FLASHING. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE HOOD BEYOND CFS COLORBOND FASCIA. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE CRS LYSAGHT TRIMDEK ROOF SHEETING. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE. CG CG DP DOWNPIPE. REFER HYD DWGS AND FINISHES CG CG CKD APP CFS WT2 SCHEDULE CFG EG CFG EG TOP OF ROOF EG EAVES GUTTER. REFER HYD ENGR DETAIL AND 4350 FINISHES SCHEDULE MS METAL SHEETING CRS P5 PAINT FINISH TYPE 5. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE. DP DP CRS DP DP WT2 WALL TILES TYPE 2. REFER FINISHES SCHEDULE.

CEILING 3000 P5 FINISHES SCHEDULE ALS HI-LIGHT SS23/60 FIXED ALUMINIUM HORIZONTAL P5 LOUVRES. POWDERCOATED TO MATCH COLORBOND

'WINDSPRAY'. AMENDMENT ALS CFC1 JAMES HARDIE SCYON MATRIX WALL CLADDING VERTICAL 2990L x 1190W (CODE 404169). CFG LYSAGHT COLORBOND FLASHING. COLORBOND PERSPECTIVES FOR APPROVAL 'MONUMENT MATT'. CFS LYSAGHT COLORBOND FASCIA. COLORBOND GROUND FLOOR 'MONUMENT MATT'. 0 CRS LYSAGHT COLORBOND TRIMDEK ROOF SHEETING. COLORBOND 'SURFMIST'. MS LYSAGHT COLORBOND LONGLINE 350 PROFILE. COLORBOND 'MONUMENT MATT'. P4 TAUBMANS ENDURE EXTERIOR PAINT WHITE LOW SHEEN. 1 WEST ELEVATION P5 DULUX WEATHERSHIELD EXTERIOR SEMI-GLOSS. 'DOMINO'. SK008 1 : 50 @ A1 WT2 TILESCOPE 'GLOSS WHITE' 100x300 BRICK BOND WALL TILE. BA 14/09/2018 REVISED CFC1 PAINT COLOUR 17/07/2018 ELEVATIONS & EXTERNAL ISS DATE

C:\Users\achuyko\Documents\[email protected]

CANOPY LINK OVER

EG EG CFG TOP OF ROOF 4350

CRS DP DP DP

CEILING 3000 CFG

CFG ISSUED FOR

P5 P5 PRELIMINARY P5

GROUND FLOOR 0

14/09/2018 3:06:42 PM FULL SIZE @ A1 2 WEST ELEVATION (CONTINUATION) SK008 1 : 50 @ A1 a: Level 2, 21 Kyabra Street, Newstead, QLD 4006 PO Box 724, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 t: 07 3257 2755 e: [email protected] w: www.cadway.com.au co: Enviropacific Pty Ltd acn: 111 372 064 abn: 43 111 372 064 CANOPY LINK OVER CFS project description PROPOSED BAYSWATER SERVICE STATION TOP OF ROOF

4350 2125 MS CFS CFS MS CFG 4.00° project address DP CFG EG EG 34 JACKSON STREET, BAYSWATER, WA 6053 CEILING DP

3000 575

450 ALS 5400 client 3mm S/S WIRE PROPOSED RETAIL TENANCY SIGNAGE VIVA ENERGY AUSTRALIA TRELLIS LTD

2400 PROPOSED RETAIL TENANCY SIGNAGE 1800 WT2 SIGNAGE

2700 BOL drawing title PROPOSED RETAIL TENANCY SIGNAGE 500PLANTER 800 500 BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHEET 2

750 WT2 WT2 600 GROUND FLOOR 0 LOW WALL

1 : 50 @ A1 scale

CS drawn 1600 3300 CFG SIGNAGE 11245 job no.

3 NORTH ELEVATION 11245 SK011 dwg no. SK008 1 : 50 @ A1 0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m B issue 1:1001:50 @ A3 Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Document SetID:3373271 2 1 EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE 1 PERSPECTIVE EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE 2 PERSPECTIVE EXTERNAL @A1 @A1 COPYRIGHT © 2018 © COPYRIGHT QBCC Lic. No. 1272165 B 11245 SK012 11245 CS PERSPECTIVES SHEET 1 LTD VIVA ENERGYAUSTRALIA BAYSWATER, WA6053 34 JACKSON STREET, STATION SERVICE PROPOSED BAYSWATER acn: co: w e t: a: PM 4:27:05 14/09/2018 C:\Users\achuyko\Documents\[email protected] @A1 [email protected] : www.cadway.com.au : 111 372 064 064 111 372 Enviropacific PtyEnviropacific Ltd 07 3257 2755 Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 Valley, Fortitude 724,PO Box QLD 4006 Newstead, 2, 21 Kyabra Street, Level abn: FULL SIZE @ A1 FULL SIZE project description project 43 111 372 064 372 43 111 DO NOT SCALE NOT DO

project address project ISSUED FOR drawing title drawing B 14/09/2018 CFC1 PAINT COLOUR REVISED CG CG dwg no. job no. job client drawn

issue scale PRELIMINARY A 17/07/2018 EXTERNAL ELEVATIONS & PERSPECTIVES FOR APPROVAL CG CG ISS DATE AMENDMENT CKD APP Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Document SetID:3373271 1 2 EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE 3 PERSPECTIVE EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE 4 PERSPECTIVE EXTERNAL @A1 @A1 COPYRIGHT © 2018 © COPYRIGHT QBCC Lic. No. 1272165 B 11245 SK013 11245 CS PERSPECTIVES SHEET 2 LTD VIVA ENERGYAUSTRALIA BAYSWATER, WA6053 34 JACKSON STREET, STATION SERVICE PROPOSED BAYSWATER acn: co: w e t: a: PM 4:27:17 14/09/2018 C:\Users\achuyko\Documents\[email protected] @A1 [email protected] : www.cadway.com.au : 111 372 064 064 111 372 Enviropacific PtyEnviropacific Ltd 07 3257 2755 Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 Valley, Fortitude 724,PO Box QLD 4006 Newstead, 2, 21 Kyabra Street, Level abn: FULL SIZE @ A1 FULL SIZE project description project 43 111 372 064 372 43 111 DO NOT SCALE NOT DO

project address project ISSUED FOR drawing title drawing B 14/09/2018 CFC1 PAINT COLOUR REVISED CG CG dwg no. job no. job client drawn

issue scale PRELIMINARY A 17/07/2018 EXTERNAL ELEVATIONS & PERSPECTIVES FOR APPROVAL CG CG ISS DATE AMENDMENT CKD APP 1300 400 1550

Unleaded 125 295 920

Unleaded 95 125 295

170

Diesel 125 5005 295

THIS SPACE CAN BE UTILISED FOR A SERVICE MESSAGE OR A PRE-APPROVED GRAPHIC DESIGN FROM VIVA 920

DOUBLE PANEL WILL BE Diesel AVAILABLE ONCE ALL SINGLE PANEL STOCK HAS BEEN EXHAUSTED 920 200

Drawn By BB © Copyright 2018 Customer Name All Dimensions in MM Viva Date 23/04/2018 This design / drawing remains the property Tolerances on Dimensions of EVOCOM and all rights strictly Drawing Revision No DO and RA - 5m slimline SI sign with VPD Linear ± 0.1 Site Address Angular ± 0.5° whatsoever is strictly prohibited without the Hole Ctrs ± 0.1 SHEET 1 OF 1 Do not scale from this drawing Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Unleaded

Unleaded 95

Diesel

Drawn By BB © Copyright 2018 Customer Name All Dimensions in MM Viva Date 23/04/2018 This design / drawing remains the property Tolerances on Dimensions of EVOCOM and all rights strictly Drawing Revision No DO and RA - 12m SI sign with VPD Linear ± 0.1 Site Address Angular ± 0.5° whatsoever is strictly prohibited without the Hole Ctrs ± 0.1 SHEET 1 OF 1 Do not scale from this drawing Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 123 4 5678910111213141516

A A

B B

C C

D D

E E

F F

VIVA ENERGY RETAIL STANDARDS - 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY

G ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING LIST G SGR-A100 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - COVER SHEET SGR-A101 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - PLAN AND DETAILS SGR-A102 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - ELEVATIONS

H H ©"Copyright 2018. All rights reservedDOCUMENT by provider UNCONTRO LLED UNLESS STAMPEDOTHERWISE PROJECT TITLE of this drawing. This drawing is subjectWHEN to CONTROLLED - COPY ISSUED TO ALL ON DISTRIBUTION STAMP 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - D 28/02/18 ISSUE FOR VIVA APPROVAL MB CG CG obligations of confidentiality, and isCREATION and shall DATE remain DRAWN BY PROJ. NUMBER. the property of the provider, as set out in the COVER SHEET C 16/11/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR REVIEW RW PS PS Services Agreement or other terms of engagement Viva Energy STANDARD DRAWING SET - RETAIL 17/08/2016 MB 11220 DRAWN TO AS1100 BY CAD DO NOT AMEND. between the provider and the recipient of this SHEET DRAWING No. REV B 12/09/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE RW PS PS Australia Ltd drawing. Unauthorised use of this drawing in any way ACN 004 610 459 MANUALLY FIGURED DIMENSIONSSIZE TO BE ISSUE is prohibited." PROJ. ENG. CHECKED BY A 09/09/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR COMMENT JC PS PS SCALE Energy Australia - PASSENGER VEHICLE FORECOURT TAKEN IN PREFERENCE TO SCALE READINGS. CG @ A1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHK'D APP'D CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME A1 SGR-A100 D REFERENCE DRAWINGS DWG. No. CAD REF: P:\ArchiOffice Documents\Storage\Project Docs\P11220\01 Current Active\01a Revit\VIVA STANDARD 123 4 5678910 11 12 13 14 CANOPY\STANDARD CANOPY15 PACKAGE\11220-TOLL GATE CAR CANOPY-5 BAY.rvt16 3:34:58 28/02/2018 PM Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 123 4 5678910111213141516

EDGE OF SHOPFRONT PARKING OR FACE OF SHOP WITH NO SHOPFRONT PARKING

30500 A 4000 7500 7500 7500 4000 A MIN. MIN. 2 PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" CANOPY OVERHANG SGR-A102 CANOPY OVERHANG DIMENSION FASCIA PANEL WITH APPLIED NON- DIMENSION TO BE TO BE CONFIRMED WITH ILLUMINATED YELLOW / RED VINYL CONFIRMED WITH COUNCIL REQUIREMENTS COUNCIL REQUIREMENTS REAR ELEVATION (TYP) (EGRESS SIDE)

B B 13000 PREFERRED (11000 MIN) DISTANCE BETWEEN DISTANCE MIN) (11000 PREFERRED 13000 C1 C2 C3 C4 LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL

CANOPY COLUMN & SHOPFRONT PARKING OR SHOP WITH NO PARKING IN FRONT IN PARKING NO WITH SHOP OR PARKING & SHOPFRONT COLUMN CANOPY ROOF LADDER ACCESS POINT LOCATION. LOCATION MUST HW WITH TYP HW WITH FE FE 600 CLR NOT BLOCK ENTRY POINT TO HC UNDER HC UNDER LANES DP DP DP DP COL COL COL COL

8000 PA SPEAKERS AND CCTV CAMERAS SPK SPK ARE TO BE LOCATED IN LINE 4 WITH THE DISPENSER 3 SGR-A102 C SGR-A102 C MIN. 4000 4000 SK700 DISPENSER SK700 DISPENSER SK700 DISPENSER SK700 DISPENSER SIDE ELEVATION (TYP)

CANOPY OVERHANG ROAD) (MAIN (TYP) ELEVATION SIDE DIMENSION TO BE CONFIRMED WITH CSU CSU CSU

COUNCIL CSU REQUIREMENTS LEADERBOAR LEADERBOAR LEADERBOAR LEADERBOAR D ENTRY BOL D ENTRY BOL D ENTRY BOL D ENTRY BOL

FRONT ELEVATION (TYP) (ENTRY SIDE) PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" D FASCIA PANEL WITH NON-ILLUMINATED D "SHELL YELLOW" CURVED FASCIA STRIP AND ILLUMINATED "SHELL RED" BAR

CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE ABOVE (ILLUMINATED) 50 1200 50 1400 300 1 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY PLAN 1 TRAFFIC DIRECTION SGR-A102 1 : 50 @ A1

NOTES: 1. ALL BOLLARDS UNLESS NOTED TO BE 90 DIA. 2. SIZE OF COLUMN MAY VARY (REFER TO ENGINEERS. DASHED LINE DENOTES COLUMN DETAIL). E TO ENG. DETAIL 3. CHANGES TO SUMP DISTANCES TO COLUMN & SUMP E S2 SPREADER SIZE DEPENDS ON DISPENSER TYPE. ON SLOPING SITES, THE 4. DISPENSER NUMBERS TO FACE SALES BUILDING, SPREADER AT THE HIGHEST ALIGNED TO BOTTOM OF SPREDERS. POINT SETS THE LEVEL 5. FIRE EXTINGUISHER BOX AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION. MAX.1200mm FROM FFL TO TOP OF FIRE EXTINGUISHER HANDLE. 6. PAD FOOTINGS UNDER CANOPY COLUMNS TO BE S3 PUMP NUMBER SIGN (TYP.) 1000mm MIN BELOW FINISHED SURFACE LEVEL. 7. SUMP OVERFLOW TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM CUSTOMERS AND DISPENSERS. 70 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIGN MIN. 8. CANOPY ROOF DOWNPIPES SHALL RUN INSIDE CANOPY 2000mm FROM FFL COLUMNS UTILIZING PVC PIPING OR SIMILAR. ENSURE 200 CSU 200 200 1165 DRAINAGE PIPEWORK IS NOT VISIBLE. NO BULKHEADS 400 400 ARE ALLOWED AT THE TOP THE COLUMN TRAFFIC DIRECTION 9. TOP OF COLUMN NEEDS TO BE FLASHED NEATLY TO LEADERBOARD BOL S2 SPREADER ABOVE HSSE HSSE THE SOFFIT WITH 50x50 TRIM. F CONDUIT LINE POSTER POSTER F

ACM CLADDING TO HOUSE P LEGEND

CONDUIT LINES & DOWNPIPE T

T C CSU CUSTOMER SERVICE UNIT

FE G

E SK700 HW 2700 DP DOWNPIPE. REFER ENG. DETAIL

. L L L C C C CSU DISPENSER X FE 9KG FIRE EXTINGUISHER AS PER AS2444 BY OTHERS A HW

0 HC HOSE COCK 250 550 300 COL CSU FOC

DP 2

T HW HAND WIPES

O L

0 U/S OF SPREADER/PUMP NUMBER OF SPREADER/PUMP U/S

W SPK FORECOURT SPEAKER

4 LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL H

D D

SK700 DISPENSER N

R R

I L

O C

H CSU I

0 0

2 2

B B

1200 1 1

2 HC

R R

F 1120

1 A

S3 PUMP NUMBER SIGNAGE T

D D

E E ABOVE 0

C U/S POSTER TYP POSTER U/S

LEADERBOARD BOL L L

6 LEADERBOARD BOL LEADERBOARD

COLUMN (TYP) REFER TO BOL EXIT LEADERBOARD LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL EXIT LEADERBOARD G 2/4 ENGINEERS DETAILS G SGR-A101

TRAFFIC DIRECTION COLUMN CENTRELINE (GRID) CL CL 100mm "SHELL GREY" DADO

NOTE: 600 CLEAR FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIGNAGE TO BE TYP INSTALLED ON COLUMNS C1 & C3. HAND WIPES AND HOSE COCK TO BE INSTALLED ON COLUMNS C2 & C3.

COLUMN CENTRELINE (GRID) COLUMN CENTRELINE (GRID) 0 0.5m 1m 1.5m 2m 2.5m 2 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY TYPICAL DETAIL PLAN 3 C1, C3 DETAIL ELEVATION 4 C2, C4 DETAIL ELEVATION 1:25 1 : 25 @ A1 1 : 25 @ A1 1 : 25 @ A1 0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m (ALTERNATE COLUMNS) (ALTERNATE COLUMNS) H 1:50 H ©"Copyright 2018. All rights reservedDOCUMENT by provider UNCONTRO LLED UNLESS STAMPEDOTHERWISE PROJECT TITLE of this drawing. This drawing is subjectWHEN to CONTROLLED - COPY ISSUED TO ALL ON DISTRIBUTION STAMP 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - D 28/02/18 ISSUE FOR VIVA APPROVAL MB CG CG obligations of confidentiality, and isCREATION and shall DATE remain DRAWN BY PROJ. NUMBER. the property of the provider, as set out in the PLAN AND DETAILS C 16/11/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR REVIEW RW PS PS Services Agreement or other terms of engagement Viva Energy STANDARD DRAWING SET - RETAIL 17/08/2016 MB 11220 DRAWN TO AS1100 BY CAD DO NOT AMEND. between the provider and the recipient of this SHEET DRAWING No. REV B 12/09/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE RW PS PS Australia Ltd drawing. Unauthorised use of this drawing in any way ACN 004 610 459 MANUALLY FIGURED DIMENSIONSSIZE TO BE ISSUE is prohibited." PROJ. ENG. CHECKED BY A 09/09/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR COMMENT JC PS PS SCALE Energy Australia - PASSENGER VEHICLE FORECOURT TAKEN IN PREFERENCE TO SCALE READINGS. CG As AS indicated INDICATED@ A1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHK'D APP'D CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME A1 SGR-A101 D REFERENCE DRAWINGS DWG. No. CAD REF: P:\ArchiOffice Documents\Storage\Project Docs\P11220\01 Current Active\01a Revit\VIVA STANDARD 123 4 5678910 11 12 13 14 CANOPY\STANDARD CANOPY15 PACKAGE\11220-TOLL GATE CAR CANOPY-5 BAY.rvt16 3:35:04 28/02/2018 PM Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 123 4 5678910111213141516

CANOPY HEIGHT CLEARANCE PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA PANEL CANOPY HEIGHT CLEARANCE CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE ABOVE SIGN "MAXIMUM HEIGHT 4.6m" WITH NON-ILLUMINATED "SHELL YELLOW" CURVED SIGN "MAXIMUM HEIGHT 4.6M" (ILLUMINATED) FASCIA STRIP AND ILLUMINATED "SHELL RED" BAR 50 1200 140050 300

A A 250450 850

SPK SPK 150

PROVIDE 50mm WHITE SPACE TO ACM COLUMN CLADDING TO HOUSE DP ACM COLUMN CLADDING TO HOUSE DP EITHER SIDE OF PECTEN SIGNAGE AND CONDUIT LINES. TO BE "SHELL WHITE" AND CONDUIT LINES. TO BE "SHELL WHITE"

S2 S2 S2 S2

S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER

B 4700 B SK700 SK700 SK700 SK700 FFL TO U/S CANOPY DISPENSER DISPENSER DISPENSER DISPENSER 2700

U/S SPREADER/PUMP NUMBER SPREADER/PUMP U/S LEADERBOARD BOL LEADERBOARD BOL LEADERBOARD BOL LEADERBOARD BOL FFL (CANOPY HIGH POINT) 0

1 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - FRONT ELEVATION C STD01 1 : 50 @ A1 C

PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA PANEL WITH APPLIED NON-ILLUMINATED YELLOW/RED CANOPY PECTEN VINYL SIGNAGE BEYOND 150 450 250

ACM COLUMN CLADDING TO HOUSE DP AND ACM COLUMN CLADDING TO HOUSE DP AND D CONDUIT LINES. TO BE "SHELL WHITE" CONDUIT LINES. TO BE "SHELL WHITE" D

S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER 4700 850 FFL TO CANOPY U/S

HW HW 2700

E LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL NUMBER SPREADER/PUMP U/S E FFL (CANOPY HIGH POINT) 0

2 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - REAR ELEVATION STD01 1 : 50 @ A1 NOTES: PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" 1. ALL BOLLARDS UNLESS NOTED TO BE 90 DIA. PANEL WITH NON-ILLUMINATED "SHELL FASCIA PANEL WITH APPLIED NON- 2. SIZE OF COLUMN MAY VARY (REFER TO ENGINEERS. YELLOW" CURVED FASCIA STRIP AND ILLUMINATED YELLOW / RED VINYL DETAIL). ILLUMINATED "SHELL RED" BAR 3. CHANGES TO SUMP DISTANCES TO COLUMN & SUMP SIZE DEPENDS ON DISPENSER TYPE. 4. DISPENSER NUMBERS TO FACE SALES BUILDING, 250450150 250450150 CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE F CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE ALIGNED TO BOTTOM OF SPREDERS. F 850 850 ABOVE (ILLUMINATED) ABOVE (ILLUMINATED) 5. FIRE EXTINGUISHER BOX AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION. MAX.1200mm FROM FFL TO TOP OF FIRE EXTINGUISHER HANDLE. SPK 6. PAD FOOTINGS UNDER CANOPY COLUMNS TO BE 1000mm MIN BELOW FINISHED SURFACE LEVEL. 7. SUMP OVERFLOW TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM S2 SPREADER S2 SPREADER CUSTOMERS AND DISPENSERS. COLUMN SHOWN DASHED 8. CANOPY ROOF DOWNPIPES SHALL RUN INSIDE CANOPY COLUMNS UTILIZING PVC PIPING OR SIMILAR. ENSURE COLUMN SHOWN DASHED TRAFFIC DIRECTION DRAINAGE PIPEWORK IS NOT VISIBLE. NO BULKHEADS TRAFFIC DIRECTION ARE ALLOWED AT THE TOP THE COLUMN S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER 9. TOP OF COLUMN NEEDS TO BE FLASHED NEATLY TO THE SOFFIT WITH 50x50 TRIM. 4700 4700 LEGEND FE SIGN CSU CUSTOMER SERVICE UNIT G FFL TO CANOPY U/S G FFL TO U/S OF CANOPY OF U/S FFL TO FE 9KG FIRE EXTINGUISHER AS PER AS2444 BY OTHERS FE HC HOSE COCK SK700 HW SK700 DISPENSER 2700 LEADERBOARD BOL DISPENSER LEADERBOARD EXIT BOL LEADERBOARD EXIT LEADERBOARD BOL HW HAND WIPES BOL S2 SPREADER CSU SPK FORECOURT SPEAKER HC CSU U/S S2 & S3 SIGNAGE/PUMP NUMBER S2 & S3 SIGNAGE/PUMP U/S FFL (CANOPY HIGH POINT) 0 SUMP 1000

APPROX. STRUCTURAL FOOTING REFER ENGINEERS DETAIL 3 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - SIDE ELEVATION (MAIN ROAD) 4 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - SIDE ELEVATION 0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m 1:50 H STD01 1 : 50 @ A1 STD01 1 : 50 @ A1 H ©"Copyright 2018. All rights reservedDOCUMENT by provider UNCONTRO LLED UNLESS STAMPEDOTHERWISE PROJECT TITLE of this drawing. This drawing is subjectWHEN to CONTROLLED - COPY ISSUED TO ALL ON DISTRIBUTION STAMP 4 TOLL GATE CANOPY - D 28/02/18 ISSUE FOR VIVA APPROVAL MB CG CG obligations of confidentiality, and isCREATION and shall DATE remain DRAWN BY PROJ. NUMBER. the property of the provider, as set out in the ELEVATIONS C 16/11/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR REVIEW RW PS PS Services Agreement or other terms of engagement Viva Energy STANDARD DRAWING SET - RETAIL 17/08/2016 MB 11220 DRAWN TO AS1100 BY CAD DO NOT AMEND. between the provider and the recipient of this SHEET DRAWING No. REV B 12/09/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE RW PS PS Australia Ltd drawing. Unauthorised use of this drawing in any way ACN 004 610 459 MANUALLY FIGURED DIMENSIONSSIZE TO BE ISSUE is prohibited." PROJ. ENG. CHECKED BY A 09/09/16 PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR COMMENT JC PS PS SCALE Energy Australia - PASSENGER VEHICLE FORECOURT TAKEN IN PREFERENCE TO SCALE READINGS. CG 1 : 50 @ A1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHK'D APP'D CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME A1 SGR-A102 D REFERENCE DRAWINGS DWG. No. CAD REF: P:\ArchiOffice Documents\Storage\Project Docs\P11220\01 Current Active\01a Revit\VIVA STANDARD 123 4 5678910 11 12 13 14 CANOPY\STANDARD CANOPY15 PACKAGE\11220-TOLL GATE CAR CANOPY-5 BAY.rvt16 PM 3:35:15 28/02/2018 Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 123 4 5678910111213141516

A A

B B

C C

D D

E E

F F

VIVA ENERGY RETAIL STANDARDS - 3 BAY HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY

G ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING LIST G SGR-A110 HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - SGR-A108 HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - SGR-A107 HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - SGR-A109 HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY -

H H ©"Copyright 2018. All rights reservedDOCUMENT by provider UNCONTRO LLED UNLESS STAMPEDOTHERWISE PROJECT TITLE of this drawing. This drawing is subjectWHEN to CONTROLLED - COPY ISSUED TO ALL ON DISTRIBUTION STAMP HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - obligations of confidentiality, and isCREATION and shall DATE remain DRAWN BY PROJ. NUMBER. the property of the provider, as set out in the Viva Energy STANDARD DRAWING SET - RETAIL COVER SHEET Services Agreement or other terms of engagement 17/08/2016 MB 11220 DRAWN TO AS1100 BY CAD DO NOT AMEND. between the provider and the recipient of this Australia Ltd SHEET DRAWING No. REV drawing. Unauthorised use of this drawing in any way ACN 004 610 459 MANUALLY FIGURED DIMENSIONSSIZE TO BE ISSUE is prohibited." PROJ. ENG. CHECKED BY A 28/02/18 ISSUE FOR VIVA APPROVAL MB CG CG SCALE Energy Australia - HEAVY VEHICLE FORECOURT TAKEN IN PREFERENCE TO SCALE READINGS. CG @ A1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHK'D APP'D CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME A1 SGR-A107 A REFERENCE DRAWINGS DWG. No. CAD REF: P:\ArchiOffice Documents\Storage\Project Docs\P11220\01 Current Active\01a Revit\VIVA STANDARD 123 4 5678910 11 12 13 14 CANOPY\STANDARD CANOPY15 PACKAGE\11220-HEAVY VEHICLE STANDARD 3 BAY16 CANOPY.rvt 4:04:30 28/02/2018 PM Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 123 4 5678910111213141516

NOTES: 1. SIZE OF COLUMN MAY VARY (REFER TO ENGINEERS. DETAIL). 2. CHANGES TO SUMP DISTANCES TO COLUMN & SUMP A SIZE DEPENDS ON DISPENSER TYPE. A 3. INSTANCES WHERE THE SHOP BUILDING IS ALIGNED WITH THE CANOPY, SPREADER PUMP NUMBERS WILL NEED TO BE INSTALLED AND ALIGNED IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THE SPREADERS. NUMBER PLACEMENT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SPREADER AND THE OTHER DIRECTLY BELOW. ENSURE THERE IS ROOM FOR HSSE POSTER FRAME. 4. FIRE EXTINGUISHER BOX AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION. MAX.1200mm FROM FFL TO TOP OF FIRE EXTINGUISHER HANDLE. 5. FOOTINGS UNDER CANOPY COLUMNS TO BE 1000mm MIN BELOW FINISHED SURFACE LEVEL. 6. SUMP OVERFLOW TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM CUSTOMERS AND DISPENSERS. 7. CANOPY ROOF DOWNPIPES SHALL RUN INSIDE 15400 CANOPY COLUMNS UTILISING PVC PIPING OR SIMILAR. B 4700 6000 4700 ENSURE DRAINAGE PIPEWORK IS NOT VISIBLE. NO B BULKHEADS ARE ALLOWED AT THE TOP THE COLUMN 8. TOP OF COLUMN NEEDS TO BE FLASHED NEATLY TO THE SOFFIT WITH 50x50 TRIM. PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA PANEL WITH APPLIED NON- ILLUMINATED YELLOW / RED VINYL TBOL2 TBOL2 REAR ELEVATION (TYP) (EGRESS SIDE) LEGEND AHR RETRACTA AR2101 AIR HOSE REEL CSU CUSTOMER SERVICE UNIT FE 9KG FIRE EXTINGUISHER AS PER AS2444 BY OTHERS A HW HAND WIPES SGR-A109 SPK FORECOURT SPEAKER TBOL1 900mm DIA TRUCK BOLLARD C TBOL2 600mm DIA TRUCK BOLLARD C "NOBOLT" NBLP4 "NOBOLT" NBLP4 LADDER PLATFORM LADDER PLATFORM

TBOL2 TBOL2 5500

SEPARATE ADBLUE DISPENSERS TO BE LOCATED AT THE FRONT SK700-II SK700-II ADBLUE ADBLUE DISPENSER OF TRUCK/HEAVY VEHICLE DISPENSER TYP. 4 2 SGR-A110 AHR AHR SGR-A110 D HW HW D COL COL DP DP 11000 PA SPEAKERS AND CCTV CAMERAS SPK ARE TO BE LOCATED IN LINE SPK FE WITH THE DISPENSER (TYP) FE ROOF LADDER ACCESS POINT LOCATION. LOCATION MUST NOT BLOCK ENTRY POINT TO LANES RIGID MAST RIGID MAST SK700-II IOD DISPENSER SK700-II IOD DISPENSER E 5500 E SIDE ELEVATION (TYP) CSU CSU SIDE ELEVATION (TYP) (MAIN ROAD) (MAIN (TYP) ELEVATION SIDE

TBOL1 TBOL1

LEADERBOARD ENTRY BOL LEADERBOARD ENTRY BOL

FRONT ELEVATION (TYP) (ENTRY SIDE) PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA PANEL WITH NON-ILLUMINATED F "SHELL YELLOW" CURVED FASCIA F STRIP AND ILLUMINATED "SHELL RED" 1 50 1200 50 1400 300 BAR SGR-A110 CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE TRAFFIC DIRECTION ABOVE (ILLUMINATED)

G A HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - PLAN G 1 : 50 @ A1

0 5m 10m 1:100 @ A3 H H ©"Copyright 2018. All rights reservedDOCUMENT by provider UNCONTRO LLED UNLESS STAMPEDOTHERWISE PROJECT TITLE of this drawing. This drawing is subjectWHEN to CONTROLLED - COPY ISSUED TO ALL ON DISTRIBUTION STAMP HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - obligations of confidentiality, and isCREATION and shall DATE remain DRAWN BY PROJ. NUMBER. the property of the provider, as set out in the Viva Energy STANDARD DRAWING SET - RETAIL PLAN Services Agreement or other terms of engagement 17/08/2016 MB 11220 DRAWN TO AS1100 BY CAD DO NOT AMEND. between the provider and the recipient of this Australia Ltd SHEET DRAWING No. REV drawing. Unauthorised use of this drawing in any way ACN 004 610 459 MANUALLY FIGURED DIMENSIONSSIZE TO BE ISSUE is prohibited." PROJ. ENG. CHECKED BY A 28/02/18 ISSUE FOR VIVA APPROVAL MB CG CG SCALE Energy Australia - HEAVY VEHICLE FORECOURT TAKEN IN PREFERENCE TO SCALE READINGS. CG 1 : 50 @ A1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHK'D APP'D CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME GB A1 SGR-A108 A REFERENCE DRAWINGS DWG. No. CAD REF: P:\ArchiOffice Documents\Storage\Project Docs\P11220\01 Current Active\01a Revit\VIVA STANDARD 123 4 5678910 11 12 13 14 CANOPY\STANDARD CANOPY15 PACKAGE\11220-HEAVY VEHICLE STANDARD 3 BAY16 CANOPY.rvt 4:04:33 28/02/2018 PM Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Document SetID:3373271 A H D B G C F E E DATE REV A 28/02/18 ISSUE FOR VIVA APPROVAL ISSUE FORVIVA 28/02/18 A 12 12 DESCRIPTION RW CHK'D DRAWN MB GCG CG 3 3 APP'D

CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME /COMPANY CONSULTANT CL CL 770 STD09 STD10 BOL A 2 550 1400 CSU TRUCK BOLLARD HEIGHT 1 :25 @ A1 3 BAYHEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY -DETAIL ELEVATION CL 1 :25 @ A1 3 BAYHEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY -DETAIL PLAN 580 4 4 1200 DISPENSER LEADERBOARD BOL FRONT ELEVATION (ENTRY SIDE)

CL LEADERBOARDBOL TRAFFIC DIRECTION TRAFFIC 6570 LEADERBOARD BOL LEADERBOARD REFERENCE DRAWINGS TBOL1 TBOL1 TBOL1 567891 56789 900 TRAFFIC DIRECTION TRAFFIC 80 CSU CSU 805 CSU DWG. No. DWG. 40 DISPENSER IOD SK700-II SK700-II IOD DISPENSER © is prohibited." is drawing. Unauthorised use of this drawing in any way this of recipient the and provider the between Services Agreement orother terms ofengagement inthe out as set provider, the of property the remain shall and is and confidentiality, of obligations to subject is drawing This drawing. this of DISP 930 "Copyright 2018. Allrights reserved by provider 4925 535 RM C L RM DOCUMENT UNCONTRO DOCUMENT PROJ. ENG. PROJ. CREATION DATE CREATION WHEN CONTROLLED - COPY ISSUED TOALLON DISTRIBUTION STAMP 17/08/2016 2000 TOP OF FE SIGN 600 1030 1120 880 RM U/S HSSE POSTER HSSE POSTER 1200 MIN TOP OF FE HANDLE DRAWN BY DRAWN CHECKED BY FE LLED UNLESS STAMPED 230 FE FE MB CG POSTER HSSE DP

COLUMN CENTRELINE (GRID) 400 COLUMN CENTRELINE (GRID) FOC 545 SCALE PROJ. PROJ. NUMBER. 1 : 25 1: HW 100mm "SHELL GREY" DADO GREY" "SHELL 100mm 11220 HC OTHERWISE AHR HC @ A1 ENGINEERS DETAILS TO REFER (TYP) COLUMN LINE CONDUIT SIGNAGE OVER NUMBER PUMP S3 DOWNPIPE & LINES CONDUIT HOUSE TO ACM CLADDING 600 300 AHR

HC HW 1175 1500 AHR TO ACCOMMODATETO HSSE POSTER FRAME. 450mm OF WIDTH CLADDING MINIMUM ENSURE NOTE: WHITE". "SHELL BE TO CLADDING LINES. CONDUIT DPAND HOUSE TO CLADDING COLUMN ACM TO ENG. DETAIL COLUMN DENOTES LINE DASHED CL FFL 2000mm FROM MIN. SIGN EXTINGUISHER FIRE S3 PUMP NUMBER SIGN (TYP.) SK700-II IODADBLUE SK700-II Energy DISPENSER DISPENSER ADBLUE IOD SK700-II Australia DSP 735 10 01 450 TBOL2 TBOL2 TBOL2 Australia Ltd Viva Energy Viva 600 ACN 004610459 11 11 LADDER PLATFORM PROJECT STANDARD DRAWING SET -RETAIL STANDARD DRAWING "NOBOLT" NBLP4 LADDER PLATFORM LADDER "NOBOLT" NBLP4 - HEAVY VEHICLE FORECOURT 2200 12 21

REAR ELEVATION (EGRESS SIDE) 13 31 TBOL2 TBOL2 TBOL2 600

300 FOC 0 580

14 SK700 DSP 41 TAKEN IN PREFERENCE TO SCALE READINGS. TOSCALE INTAKEN PREFERENCE CAD REF: DRAWN TO AS1100 BY CAD DO NOT AMEND. 2700 TITLE MANUALLY FIGURED DIMENSIONS TO BE

VERIFYALL DIMENSIONS SITE. ON U/S PUMP SIGN CANOPY\STANDARD CANOPY PACKAGE\11220-HEAVY VEHICLE STANDARD 3 BAY CANOPY.rvt 3BAY STANDARD VEHICLE PACKAGE\11220-HEAVY CANOPY CANOPY\STANDARD STANDARD Revit\VIVA Active\01a Current Docs\P11220\01 Documents\Storage\Project P:\ArchiOffice TBOL2 600mm DIA TRUCK BOLLARD DIA TRUCK 600mm TBOL2 BOLLARD DIA TRUCK 900mm MAST RIGID TBOL1 WIPES HAND RM HOSECOCK HW OTHERS BY AS2444 PER AS EXTINGUISHER FIRE 9KG HC DETAIL REFERENG. DOWNPIPE. FE SERVICEUNIT CUSTOMER DP BOLLARD ENTRY LEADERBOARD CSU REEL HOSE AIR AR2101 RETRACTA BOL AHR .SUMPOVERFLOW BEDIRECTED TO AWAYFR 6. BE TO COLUMNS CANOPY UNDER FOOTINGS 5. MANUFACTURERS PER AS BOX EXTINGUISHER FIRE 4. 3. &SUMP COLUMN TO DISTANCES SUMP TO CHANGES 2. COLUMN SIZEOF MAY VARY(REFER ENGINEERS. TO 1. NOTES: .TOP OF COLUMN NEEDS TOBE FLASHEDNEATLY TO 8. RUN INSIDE SHALL DOWNPIPES ROOF CANOPY 7. HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY- FIRE EXTINGUISHER HANDLE. EXTINGUISHER FIRE OF TOP TO FROM MAX.1200mm FFL SPECIFICATION. POSTER FRAME. HSSE FOR ROOM IS THERE ENSURE BELOW. DIRECTLY IS AT THE THE BOTTOM OF SPREADER AND THE OTHER PLACEMENT NUMBER SPREADERS. THE AS DIRECTION NEED TO BE INSTALLED AND ALIGNED IN THE SAME WITHTHE CANOPY, SPREADER PUMPNUMBERS WILL TYPE. DISPENSER ON DEPENDS SIZE DETAIL). THE SOFFIT WITH 50x50 TRIM. BULKHEADS ARE ALLOWED AT THE THETOP COLUMN ENSURE DRAINAGE PIPEWORKNOT ISVISIBLE. NO SIMILAR. OR PIPING PVC UTILISING COLUMNS CANOPY CUS MIN BE INSTANCES WHERE THE SHOP BUILDING IS ALIGNED TOMERS ANDDISPENSERS. TOMERS 5m LOW FINISHED SURFACE LEVEL. SURFACE FINISHED LOW A1 SHEET SIZE 15 51 DETAIL DRAWING No. DRAWING SGR-A109 LEGEND 10m

1000mm 16 OM 1:100 6

@ A3 ISSUE A REV

A B G H D C F

E 28/02/2018 4:04:37 PM 123 4 5678910111213141516

NOTES: PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA PANEL 1. SIZE OF COLUMN MAY VARY (REFER TO ENGINEERS. WITH NON-ILLUMINATED "SHELL YELLOW" CURVED DETAIL). FASCIA STRIP AND ILLUMINATED "SHELL RED" BAR 2. CHANGES TO SUMP DISTANCES TO COLUMN & SUMP CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE ABOVE SIZE DEPENDS ON DISPENSER TYPE. A (ILLUMINATED) 3. INSTANCES WHERE THE SHOP BUILDING IS ALIGNED A CANOPY HEIGHT CLEARANCE SIGN 50 1200 50 1400 300 CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA ABOVE (ILLUMINATED) WITH THE CANOPY, SPREADER PUMP NUMBERS WILL "MAXIMUM HEIGHT 5.4m" TYP. PANEL WITH NON-ILLUMINATED "SHELL NEED TO BE INSTALLED AND ALIGNED IN THE SAME YELLOW" CURVED FASCIA STRIP AND DIRECTION AS THE SPREADERS. NUMBER PLACEMENT ILLUMINATED "SHELL RED" BAR IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SPREADER AND THE OTHER DIRECTLY BELOW. ENSURE THERE IS ROOM FOR HSSE POSTER FRAME. 250450150 4. FIRE EXTINGUISHER BOX AS PER MANUFACTURERS

850 SPECIFICATION. MAX.1200mm FROM FFL TO TOP OF FIRE EXTINGUISHER HANDLE. SPK SPK SPK 5. FOOTINGS UNDER CANOPY COLUMNS TO BE 1000mm MIN BELOW FINISHED SURFACE LEVEL. 6. SUMP OVERFLOW TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM CUSTOMERS AND DISPENSERS. PROVIDE 50mm WHITE SPACE TO 7. CANOPY ROOF DOWNPIPES SHALL RUN INSIDE ACM COLUMN CLADDING TO EITHER SIDE OF PECTEN SIGNAGE HOUSE DP AND CONDUIT CANOPY COLUMNS UTILISING PVC PIPING OR SIMILAR. LINES. TO BE "SHELL WHITE" ENSURE DRAINAGE PIPEWORK IS NOT VISIBLE. NO B BULKHEADS ARE ALLOWED AT THE TOP THE COLUMN B 8. TOP OF COLUMN NEEDS TO BE FLASHED NEATLY TO RM RM THE SOFFIT WITH 50x50 TRIM. COLUMN SHOWN DASHED TRAFFIC DIRECTION S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER LEGEND 5500 RM AHR RETRACTA AR2101 AIR HOSE REEL FE SIGN BOL LEADERBOARD ENTRY BOLLARD

FFL TO CANOPY U/S SK700-II ADBLUE CSU CUSTOMER SERVICE UNIT DISPENSER POSTER SK700-II IOD SK700-II IOD AHR FE 9KG FIRE EXTINGUISHER AS PER AS2444 BY OTHERS DISPENSER DISPENSER HC HOSE COCK HW HAND WIPES 2700 SK700-II IOD TBOL1 TBOL1 RM RIGID MAST LEADERBOARD BOL DISPENSER TBOL1 CSU FE HW SPK FORECOURT SPEAKER C NUMBER U/S PUMP TBOL1 900mm DIA TRUCK BOLLARD C LEADERBOARD BOL LEADERBOARD BOL HC TBOL2 600mm DIA TRUCK BOLLARD FFL (CANOPY HIGH POINT) 0 "NO BOLT" NBLP4 TBOL2 TBOL2 SUMP SUMP LADDER PLATFORM

STRUCTURAL FOOTING REFER ENGINEERS DETAIL. TYP.

1 3 BAY HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - FRONT ELEVATION 2 3 BAY HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - SIDE ELEVATION (MAIN ROAD) STD09 1 : 50 @ A1 STD09 1 : 50 @ A1 D D

PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" CANOPY PECTEN SIGNAGE PROPOSED CANOPY "SHELL WHITE" FASCIA PANEL CANOPY PECTEN FASCIA PANEL WITH APPLIED NON- (ILLUMINATED) WITH APPLIED NON-ILLUMINATED YELLOW/RED SIGNAGE BEYOND ILLUMINATED YELLOW / RED VINYL VINYL

E E

SPK 150 450 250

ACM COLUMN CLADDING TO HOUSE DP AND CONDUIT ACM COLUMN CLADDING TO HOUSE DP AND LINES. TO BE "SHELL WHITE" CONDUIT LINES. TO BE "SHELL WHITE"

RM RM COLUMN SHOWN DASHED TRAFFIC DIRECTION

S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER S3 PUMP NUMBER F 5500 850 F FE SIGN FFL TO CANOPY U/S

AHR SK700-II ADBLUE SK700-II ADBLUE DISPENSER DISPENSER

2700 SK700-II ADBLUE SK700-II IOD DISPENSER LEADERBOARD BOL DISPENSER FE HW TBOL1

U/S PUMP NUMBER U/S PUMP CSU "NO BOLT" NBLP4 "NO BOLT" NBLP4 HC LADDER PLATFORM LADDER PLATFORM FFL (CANOPY HIGH POINT) 0 "NO BOLT" NBLP4 TBOL2 TBOL2 LADDER PLATFORM SUMP SUMP G G

STRUCTURAL FOOTING REFER ENGINEERS DETAIL. TYP. 3 3 BAY HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - REAR ELEVATION 4 3 BAY HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - SIDE ELEVATION STD09 1 : 50 @ A1 STD09 1 : 50 @ A1

0 5m 10m 1:100 @ A3 H H ©"Copyright 2018. All rights reservedDOCUMENT by provider UNCONTRO LLED UNLESS STAMPEDOTHERWISE PROJECT TITLE of this drawing. This drawing is subjectWHEN to CONTROLLED - COPY ISSUED TO ALL ON DISTRIBUTION STAMP HEAVY VEHICLE CANOPY - obligations of confidentiality, and isCREATION and shall DATE remain DRAWN BY PROJ. NUMBER. the property of the provider, as set out in the Viva Energy STANDARD DRAWING SET - RETAIL ELEVATIONS Services Agreement or other terms of engagement 17/08/2016 MB 11220 DRAWN TO AS1100 BY CAD DO NOT AMEND. between the provider and the recipient of this Australia Ltd SHEET DRAWING No. REV drawing. Unauthorised use of this drawing in any way ACN 004 610 459 MANUALLY FIGURED DIMENSIONSSIZE TO BE ISSUE is prohibited." PROJ. ENG. CHECKED BY A 28/02/18 ISSUE FOR VIVA APPROVAL MB CG CG SCALE Energy Australia - HEAVY VEHICLE FORECOURT TAKEN IN PREFERENCE TO SCALE READINGS. CG 1 : 50 @ A1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHK'D APP'D CONSULTANT / COMPANY NAME A1 SGR-A110 A REFERENCE DRAWINGS DWG. No. CAD REF: P:\ArchiOffice Documents\Storage\Project Docs\P11220\01 Current Active\01a Revit\VIVA STANDARD 123 4 5678910 11 12 13 14 CANOPY\STANDARD CANOPY15 PACKAGE\11220-HEAVY VEHICLE STANDARD 3 BAY16 CANOPY.rvt 4:04:44 28/02/2018 PM Document Set ID: 3373271 Version: 1, Version Date: 20/03/2019 Location Plan- 34 Jackson Street, Bayswater

P E T E R W E B B A N D A S S O C I A T E S

C O N S U L T A N T S I N T O W N P L A N N I N G A N D U R B A N D E S I G N

8 July 2019 Our Ref: C2299-02

Chief Executive Officer City of Bayswater PO Box 457 MORLEY WA 6943

Attention: Helen Smith – Manager Approval Services

Dear Sir/Madam

FORM 2 – MINOR AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL (DAP/18/01492) SERVICE STATION & FAST FOOD OUTLETS LOT 9 (#34) JACKSON ST, BAYSWATER Peter Webb & Associates (PWA) acts for Horizon 73 Pty Ltd and 2XT Pty Ltd (Owner), the registered proprietors of Lot 9 (#34) Jackson Street, Bayswater (Subject Site). Conditional approval was granted by the Metro-Central Joint Development Assessment Panel (JDAP) at its meeting held on 7 March 2019 for a proposed Service Station and Fast Food Outlets (Proposed Development) at the Subject Site (reference no: DAP/18/01492) (Approval). A copy of the Approval is included at Annexure 1. On behalf of the Owner, we now propose to amend the Approval pursuant to Regulaton 17 of the Planning & Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011. For this purpose, please find enclosed a completed and signed DAP Form 2, City of Belmont Application for Planning Approval Form, MRS Form 1 and the required (DAP + City combined) application fees ($536.00). PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Deletion of Condition 4: This application seeks the deletion of Condition 4 which states: 4. Prior to the removal of the seven verge trees, the owner/applicant is to pay the City of Bayswater the amount of $22,320 as determined by the Helliwell Assessment undertaken by the City to compensate for the loss of amenity value provided by these trees. Neither the Applicant or the JDAP were provided with a copy of the Helliwell Assessment undertaken by the City. It is the Applicant’s view, after receiving legal advice, that this Condition does not have a proper planning purpose, has no nexus to the Proposed Development and could not have validly been imposed by the JDAP in making its decision. On this basis, Condition 4 is sought for removal. Please refer to legal advice at Annexure 2 setting out the basis for this condition to be removed. The trees are required to be removed for a number of reasons including:  in order for the two (2) approved pylon signs displaying fuel pricing and tenancy signage to be seen from adjacent roadways;

Unit Two, 19 York Street Subiaco Postal: PO Box 920, Subiaco Western Australia 6904 Telephone (+61 8) 9388 7111 Facsimile (+61 8) 9388 7240 Mobile 0424 651 513 email: [email protected] website: www.webbplan.com.au Trading for NL Hidding Pty Ltd. ACN 610 081 724 PETER WEBB AND ASSOCIATE S

DAP Form 2 – Application for Amendment of a DAP Decision Our Ref: C2299-02 DAP/18/01492 Page 2  because of new crossovers being installed and required sighlines for drivers turning in and out of the site;  because some of the trees are located on the boundary and/or are not in good condition; and  the verge width is very narrow (approximately 2.5m wide), and trees not located centrally can affect the roadway and or the development site. See below for some photographs of the existing trees:

Trees along truncation of Collier Road and Jackson Street Verge trees adjacent to the current southern crossover.

Trees along verge of Jackson Street. Verge tree adjacent to approved 5m high pylon sign. PETER WEBB AND ASSOCIATE S

DAP Form 2 – Application for Amendment of a DAP Decision Our Ref: C2299-02 DAP/18/01492 Page 3 Amendment of Condition 11: This application seeks the amendment of Condition 11 which states: 11. No storage or display of goods is to occur outside the building, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater. As is commonplace with Service Stations, operators typically store and display goods such as ice, wood, gas bottles and water bottles outside the buildings in a safe and practical area (and most of the time in a cage or other type of receptacle) for ease of access for customers (rather than having these goods inside the premises). The operator of the Service Station would like this to occur, however the current wording of Condition 11 would prevent this. Therefore, we would seek Condition 11 to be amended to allow for this type of outdoor storage of goods which is common practice.

Should you wish to discuss any part of this Application, please do not hesitate to contact us on 9388 7111. Yours faithfully

NIK HIDDING Managing Director

Our Ref: JS:BF:19481 Enquiries: Julius Skinner or Brendan Foley Direct Line: 9404 9127 / 9404 9126 Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

17 June 2019

Mr Nik Hidding Managing Director Peter Webb & Associates PO Box 920 SUBIACO WA 6904 By email

Dear Mr Hidding

Metro Central Joint Development Assessment Panel (‘JDAP’) approval: Proposed Service Station with Associated Convenience Store and Two Fast Food Outlets (‘Development’) - 34 Jackson Street, Bayswater (‘Land’) You have sought our advice in relation to the validity of condition 4 (Condition 4) of the approval of the Development granted by the JDAP on 7 March 2019 (JDAP Approval).

Summary

 Condition 4 was imposed as a quid pro quo for the Development and justified by the mandatory and self-standing application of the City of Bayswater’s ‘Trees on Private Land and Street Verges’ local planning policy (Policy)

 Condition 4 does not have a proper planning purpose

 Condition 4 does not have a “real connection” or nexus to the Development

 Condition 4 could not have been validly imposed by the JDAP and is amenable to deletion

Background

1. Condition 4 of the JDAP Approval provides as follows:

Prior to the removal of the seven verge trees, the owner/applicant is to pay the City of Bayswater the amount of $22,320 as determined by the Helliwell Assessment undertaken by the City to compensate for the loss of amenity value provided by these trees.

2. Condition 4 was seemingly imposed solely in light of the following paragraph (Extract) that was contained in the City of Bayswater’s (City) responsible authority report (RAR):

Verge Trees

The proposed new crossovers along Jackson Street will result in the removal of seven verge trees. As per the City Trees on Private Land and Street Verges in the event street verge removal is warranted there is a requirement for payment of a fee for the loss of amenity value of the tree in accordance with the City of Bayswater's fees and charges. In this instance for the removal of seven verge trees the applicant is required to pay the amount of $22,320 as determined by the Helliwell Assessment undertaken by the City to compensate for the loss of amenity value provided by these trees.

3. The “Helliwell Assessment” referred to in the Extract did not form part of the RAR nor was it, we are instructed provided to your office (as the applicant) or to your client (the owner).

Brief planning framework and relevant decisions

4. The RAR noted that the Land is “zoned 'General Industry'” under the City’s Local Planning Scheme No. 24 (LPS24) and “is surrounded with industrial buildings”.

5. The City’s ‘Fees and Charges - 2018-19’ (Fees & Charges) provides as follows under the heading ‘Parks and Gardens’

Removal of tree to place a driveway Calculation based on the Helliwell tree valuation system multiplied by $60 to produce the amenity value of the tree.

6. The purpose of the City’s Policy is (emphasis added):

To outline the requirements for providing, maintaining and protecting trees on private land and the street verge during the development of land or residential subdivision in the City of Bayswater

7. Clause 2 of that part of the Policy dealing with trees on street verges provides (emphasis added):

(a) The removal of the tree, including engaging a qualified contractor and any costs or claims that may arise from the removal of the tree; and

(b) The payment of a fee for the loss of amenity value of the tree in accordance with the City of Bayswater's fees and charges, to the satisfaction of the City of Bayswater.

8. The test for the validity of a planning condition is as articulated by the House of Lords in Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578, which test applies in Western Australia (see Planning Commission (WA) v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 63 and reaffirmed in Reid v Western Australian Planning Commission [2016] WASCA 181), where it was described in the following terms:

A condition attached to a grant of planning permission will not be valid therefore unless:

1. The condition is for a planning purpose and not for any ulterior purpose. A planning purpose is one that implements a planning policy whose scope is ascertained by reference to the legislation that confers planning functions on the authority, not by reference to some preconceived general notion of what constitutes planning.

2. The condition reasonably and fairly relates to the development permitted.

3. The condition is not so unreasonable that no reasonable planning authority could have imposed it.

9. In Reid v Western Australian Planning Commission [2016] WASCA 181 (Reid), it was further explained:

Those principles require the establishment of a connection or relationship between the planning purpose for which the condition has been imposed, and the likely or possible consequences of the proposed subdivision. That connection or relationship must be established as a matter of fact. A relevant connection or relationship will not be established merely because the application for subdivision approval provides an opportunity or occasion to impose a condition in the furtherance of a proper planning purpose. Rather, the relevant connection or relationship must be between the planning purpose to be served by the condition and the likely or possible consequences of the proposed subdivision such as a need for public open space, or a foreshore reserve, or improved road access as a consequence of residential subdivision and development.

10. The concept of a condition being a quid pro quo for subdivision or development was subjected to critique by the Court of Appeal in Reid as follows:

Although the reasons of the Tribunal are at points difficult to construe, it seems that the Tribunal thought it was unnecessary to identify any factual connection or relationship between the consequences or effects of the proposed subdivision and the planning purpose served by the condition, if the condition served or enhanced 'equally valid, perhaps wider, "societal" aims expressed through planning instruments'. Consistently with that view, the Tribunal reasoned that because the 'planning framework' directed attention to environmental matters and manifested a policy that the subdivision of rural land would not be approved unless an environmental benefit was provided as a 'quid pro quo' for the approval, the condition imposed arose 'directly out of the fact of this subdivision itself'.

This process of reasoning elides the distinction between the requirement that the condition be imposed in the furtherance of a proper planning purpose, and the further requirement that the condition reasonably and fairly relate to the particular subdivision proposed. In effect, the Tribunal has concluded that because there is a general policy against the subdivision of rural land unless an environmental benefit or offset is provided as the price of the subdivision (a proper planning purpose), any application for the subdivision of rural land provides an appropriate occasion for the furtherance of that purpose, without more. However, the test enunciated in the cases to which I have referred, and acknowledged by the Tribunal, requires more than that the condition be imposed in the furtherance of a proper planning purpose. Rather, the condition and the purpose which it serves must reasonably and fairly relate to the particular development proposed.

11. Hence, following the decision of the Court of Appeal in Reid, it is insufficient to justify a condition based on the fact that it furthers a planning purpose of a broader societal aim, without establishing how the condition directly relates to the proposed development or subdivision in question.

12. In other words, the decision of the Court of Appeal in Reid is authority for the proposition that it is insufficient to rely on a policy, even where it furthers a planning purpose of a broader societal aim, as a self-standing justification for the imposition of a condition.

13. Clause 3(3) of the deemed provisions (schedule 2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (Regulations) requires that a local planning policy “must be based on sound town planning principles”.

Comments and advice

14. Having regard to the Extract and the materials before the JDAP, our view is that Condition 4 was imposed as a consequence of the Policy without:

(a) establishing how the condition directly relates to the Development or reference to the consequences of the Development if the condition was not imposed; i.e. no “real connection” between Condition 4 and the Development was established (see Presiding Member of the Metropolitan Central Joint Development Assessment Panel v 43 McGregor Road Pty Ltd [2018] WASC 98); or

(b) recognising that the responsibility (and consequently liability) for payment under clause 2 of that part of the Policy dealing with trees on street verges is discretionary.

15. Specifically, as the express planning purpose of the Policy is to outline “requirements for providing, maintaining or protecting trees on …. the street verge”, the payment of the amount of $22,320 as compensation “for the loss of amenity value” of the seven verge trees is inconsistent with that express planning purpose, as:

(a) no trees are being either provided, maintained or protected by Condition 4; and

(b) the compensation to be paid by Condition 4 is not directed:

(i) towards that express planning purpose; or

(ii) to a specific trust fund for that express planning purpose (as required by section 6.9 of the Local Government Act 1995 (WA)).

16. Further, no assessment or information was before the JDAP to enable the JDAP to determine the “real connection” between Condition 4 and the Development. That is, whether the Development would have likely or possible consequences in terms of:

(a) the amenity, and the amenity value, of the seven trees to be removed, as the Helliwell Assessment referred to in the Extract; or

(b) the amenity of the surrounding industrial zoned land and development and of those persons who would work at, and the patrons of, the Development and the surrounding “industrial buildings

was not disclosed, and is not explained within the context of the Policy (and in particular how the figure of $60 in the Fees & Charges is arrived at).

17. Even if it can be accepted that it is a proper planning purpose to ameliorate the loss of trees (and tree canopy coverage) associated with development and subdivision of land by:

(a) generating revenue derived from a monetary value for the loss of those trees; and

(b) utilizing that revenue to supplement existing tree planting programs undertaken (or to be undertaken) by a local government,

the Policy deals in part with the first component, but not the second.

18. The deficiencies in the Policy are:

(a) the absence of any detail with respect to the application of the Helliwell methodology and how a monetary value on amenity trees is derived and placed on those trees; and

(b) the absence of any statement that revenue generated will be allocated to a specific trust fund (or budget item) for use for additional planting of trees within the scheme area under LPS24.

19. On account of these deficiencies, in our view it cannot be said that the Policy is “based on sound town planning principles” as required by clause 3(3) of the deemed provisions of the Regulations.

20. It follows from the above that our view is that Condition 4:

(a) does not have a proper planning purpose or a “real connection” or nexus to the Development;

(b) could not have been validly imposed by the JDAP; and

We are content for this letter to be disclosed to the JDAP as part of any Form 2 application under the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulation 2011 to amend the JDAP Approval by the deletion of Condition 4.

Yours sincerely

Julius Skinner Principal LSV Borrello Lawyers

HELLIWELL AMENITY VALUATION 34 Jackson Street, Bayswater

Mark Short Consulting Arborist Introduction An assessment was undertaken on 9 trees located on the verge adjacent to 34 Jackson Street, Bayswater, due to a proposed development and associated request to remove the respective trees. The purpose of the assessment is to determine if removal is appropriate to the situation based upon the health and condition of the trees and nature of the development.

Where a tree is approved for removal the amenity valuation for each tree is provided to the applicant for payment to the City for the loss of the environmental asset as per the Trees on Private Land and Street Verges Policy and the City’s Fees and Charges. In addition to this, the applicant is to pay for removal of the tree’s) utilising the services of a Qualified Arborist and undertake replacement planting of trees on a 1/1 basis with a minimum bag size of 45 litre and species that are in accordance with the City’s Approved tree species list.

Assessment Summary When viewing the trees (standing on Jackson Street) from left to right, the first two, being Evergreen Ash, were found to have died, as such an amenity value was not applied to these, these trees can be removed without payment of an amenity value.

Trees that have been numbered 1 to 7 were found to hold a size and condition that made them attributable to being valued.

Trees numbers 1 to 5 are requested to be removed due to a proposed driveway and can be removed.

Tree 6 is requested to be removed due to location of a proposed advertising sign and can be removed, however retention is possible, as there is 10m of open ground where the sign could be placed..

Two River red gum’s located between trees 6 and 7 do not require removal as they are located in a proposed island and where found to be in good health and condition. As such, did not require inclusion in this valuation. Their form would allow for uplifting to take place to allow for sightlines when exiting the respective driveways.

Tree 7 is requested to be removed due to a proposed driveway and can be removed.

There are an additional 4 trees at the corner of Jackson Street and Collier Link that are adjacent to the fence line of 34 Jackson Street, these and the two River Red Gums located in the proposed island are not permitted to be removed or pruned, as they hold a good health and condition and do not interfere with the proposed development of the property. Appropriate pruning would be undertaken by the City following completion of the development to facilitate sight lines as necessary.

As such, the remaining trees are required to be preserved and protected during the period of construction, through the placement of temporary steel mesh fencing around each tree at a minimum distance of 2m from the their trunks, utilising a minimum of 4 panels per tree. This will form the tree protection zone until full completion of the project. This fencing in not permitted to be moved or removed without prior consultation with the City of Bayswater’s Consulting Arborist

The fencing is to have a Tree Protection Zone signs placed on all sides to notify workers of its purpose. (Attachment 1)