Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report 2019/20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report 2019/20 Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report 2019/20 Preface This report has been produced by Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant. All figures quoted in this report are as reported to NHS Blood and Transplant by 12 May 2020 for the UK Transplant Registry, maintained on behalf of the transplant community and National Health Service (NHS), or for the NHS Organ Donor Register, maintained on behalf of the UK Health Departments. NHS regions have been used throughout the report for convenience in comparisons with the previous year's figures. The information provided in the tables and figures given in Chapters 2-10 does not always distinguish between adult and paediatric transplantation. For the most part, the data also do not distinguish between patients entitled to NHS treatment (Group 1 patients) and those who are not (Group 2 patients). The UK definition of an organ donor is any donor from whom at least one organ has been retrieved with the intention to transplant. Organs retrieved solely for research purposes have not been counted in this Activity Report. Organ donation has been recorded to reflect the number of organs retrieved. For example, if both lungs were retrieved, two lungs are recorded even if they were both used in one transplant. Similarly, if one liver is donated, one liver is recorded even if it results in two or more transplants. The number of donors after brain death (DBD) and donors after circulatory death (DCD) by hospital are documented in Appendix I. Donation and transplant rates in this report are presented per million population (pmp): population figures used throughout this report are mid-2018 estimates based on ONS 2011 Census figures and are given in Appendix III. All charts presented in this report are available as an accompanying slide set available from http://www.odt.nhs.uk. A supplementary report on organ donation and transplantation activity for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups is published alongside this Activity Report – Organ Donation and Transplantation data for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities. It provides additional information on trends in organ donation and transplantation for BAME communities. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges for UK transplantation. Concerns about the ability to care for transplant recipients, lack of access to resource because it is being used for patients in the pandemic, and the risk versus benefit for immunosuppressed transplant recipients, have resulted in a major reduction in the number of organ transplants undertaken. Waiting list figures at the 31 March 2020 do not accurately reflect the need for an organ transplant due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Different practices have been established across the UK and across organ groups with regards to waiting list management. Due to this, a snapshot of the waiting list at 29 February 2020 has been used to better reflect activity near the end of the 2019-2020 financial year. Acknowledgement NHS Blood and Transplant would like to thank all those in the donation and transplantation communities responsible for providing data to the UK Transplant Registry and the Potential Donor Audit, without whom this report would not be possible. Thanks also go to NHS Blood and Transplant staff responsible for data entry and accuracy and completeness of the data. Foreword The last decade has seen a huge increase in the number of deceased donors and lifesaving or life transforming transplants. Until February 2020, we were confident that we would once again see a UK record number of organ donors and transplants. Then the global COVID-19 pandemic hit in March and the impact was felt across the whole of the NHS and in every aspect of UK society. In March 2020 we witnessed a sharp reduction in activity with a decline in deceased donors as well as the number of transplants. This was due to concerns for patient safety and the fact NHS resources were required to deal with the COVID-19 crisis. Through dedication, effort and with the support of the wider NHS, we were able to keep aspects of organ donation and transplantation available for highly urgent patients even during the peak of the surge of COVID-19. Yet there was still a fall in the overall number of deceased organ donors - 1,580 compared to 1,600 last year. Subsequently, the number of patients who received a deceased organ donor transplant fell from 3,952 to 3,760. Unfortunately COVID-19 also had a big impact on living donation kidney transplant numbers just as it did in most other countries. Living donor transplants fell by 4% to 1,001. We fully realise that this has been a very worrying time for patients who are awaiting a transplant and for the families of those patients. We would like to take this opportunity to reassure them that the recovery of donation and transplantation is well underway and the majority of transplant units have reopened, with all heart, lungs and liver transplant units functioning at the time of writing. Despite these challenges, it is testament to the strong foundations laid in the UK that we have seen incredible family support for organ donation. Even during the worst days of the pandemic there were 91 deceased organ donors (March 2020) from UK intensive care units. Impressively the overall consent/authorisation rate for organ donation has continued to rise over the last year to 68%. During the pandemic crisis this consent rate was even higher at 74.5% (March 2020). Looking forward we are committed to do all that we can to increase the number of organ donors and transplants even as we continue to fight COVID-19. We hope that, with England’s move to an opt out system as a result of Max and Keira’s law, we will continue to see improved public support for organ donation as Wales has seen since the legislative change in December 2015. Scotland is intending to commence its own deemed authorisation legislation in the Spring of 2021. With the new law in effect in England since 20 May 2020, it is important that people know that they still have a choice whether or not to donate. Families will still be consulted, and people’s faith culture and beliefs will continue to be respected. We are grateful to all those in the faith and belief community across the UK who advised us during the preparation for the legislative change. As the current pandemic situation improves, we believe that the new law and growing public support will lead to even more lives saved. Anthony Clarkson Prof John Forsythe Dr Dale Gardiner Director - Organ and Tissue Medical Director - Organ and National Clinical Lead For Organ Donation and Transplantation Tissue Donation and Donation Transplantation Contents 1 Summary of Donor and Transplant Activity .......................................................................... 1 2 Overview of Organ Donation and Transplantation ............................................................... 3 2.1 Summary of activity ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Transplant list ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Transplants .......................................................................................................................... 9 3 Organ Donation Activity ........................................................................................................ 12 3.1 Summary of activity ........................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Organ donors .................................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Demographic characteristics ............................................................................................. 17 4 The National Organ Retrieval Service and Usage of Organs ............................................. 19 4.1 The National Organ Retrieval Service (NORS) ................................................................. 20 4.2 Retrieval and usage of organs ........................................................................................... 22 5 Kidney Activity ....................................................................................................................... 32 5.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................... 33 5.2 Transplant list .................................................................................................................... 36 5.3 Donor and organ supply .................................................................................................... 40 5.4 Transplants ........................................................................................................................ 41 5.5 Demographic characteristics ............................................................................................. 49 6 Pancreas Activity .................................................................................................................. 51 6.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................... 52 6.2 Transplant list .................................................................................................................... 53 6.3 Donor and organ supply ...................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Euro GTP Guidance
    EURO­GTP Euro GTP Guidance European Union Project in the framework of the Public Health Program Agreement number: 2007 207 Coordinator: Transplant Services Foundation 1 List of Authors ‐ Euro GTP Project Coordinator TSF ▪ Transplant Services Foundation | Spain Project Partners BISLIFE | Netherlands BTV ▪ Banca Tessuti della Regione Veneto | Italy CBC ▪ Hornhautbank Berlin Charite Universitatsmedizin | Germany EHB ▪ European Homograft Bank | Belgium ESB ▪ Euro Skin Bank | Netherlands HBM ▪ Hornhautbank München Gemeinnutzige | Germany ISS‐CNT ▪ Istituto Superiore di Sanita Centro Nazionale Trapianti | Italy KCBTiK ▪ Krajowe Centrum Bankowania Tkanek I Komórek | Poland QAMH ▪ Queen Astrid Military Hospital | Belgium REGEA ▪ Tampere Yliopisto. University of Tampere | Finland i Table of Contents PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................................................................1 SECTION A: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................................3 A.1. PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 A.2. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 8 A.2.1. FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS FOR RECOVERY...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freezing of Surplus Donated Whole Eyes in the Central Eye Bank of Iran
    RESEARCH Freezing of Surplus Donated Whole Eyes in the Central Eye Bank of Iran Use of Defrosted Corneas for Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Report of Postoperative Eye Bank Data Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi, MD; Mohammad Ali Javadi, MD; Fatemeh Javadi; Tahereh Chamani, MS ABSTRACT especially when a shortage exists for fresh donor corneas for transplantation. PURPOSE: To describe the method of freezing and thaw- KEYWORDS: cornea, freezing, whole eyes, DALK, ing of donated whole eyes (DWEs), which were surplus to eye banks, thawing....................................... requirements in the Central Eye Bank of Iran (CEBI), and to report the 3-year results of using defrosted corneas in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in keratoconic eyes. he Central Eye Bank of Iran (CEBI) is the METHODS: The method of freezing and thawing of only eye bank in Iran and is located in Tehran. surplus DWEs in the CEBI is described. Surplus DWEs Tissue requirements for corneal and scleral at the CEBI were disinfected, processed, and transferred T transplantation in Iran are supplied and preserved to the freezer (-70°C) for long-term preservation. In case 1 of a shortage of fresh and refrigerated corneas for DALK, by the CEBI. There has been an increasing trend in a frozen DWE was defrosted and distributed for trans- corneal transplantation in Iran, from 200 grafts in plantation either as a whole eye in moist chamber or as 1988 to 6,053 in 2012 (unpublished data). Keratoco- an excised corneoscleral disc in Eusol C at 2˚C to 8˚C. nus is the most common indication for penetrating Furthermore, eye bank data of the frozen DWEs as well 1 as postoperative eye bank reports of implementation of keratoplasty in Iran, accounting for 34.5% of cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Research : Code of Practice and Standards
    �;HTA • Human Tissue Authority £ Research Code of Practice and Standards Published: 3 April 2017 Code E: Research Contents Introduction to the Human Tissue Authority Codes of Practice .................................. 3 Introduction to the Research Code ............................................................................. 5 The role of HTA in regulating research under the Human Tissue Act 2004 ............ 5 Scope of this Code .................................................................................................. 5 Offences under the HT Act ...................................................................................... 6 Structure and navigation ......................................................................................... 6 Relevant material and research ................................................................................. 7 What is research? ................................................................................................... 7 What is relevant material? ....................................................................................... 7 Access to tissue from the living ............................................................................... 9 Access to tissue from the deceased ..................................................................... 10 Research involving stillborn babies or infants who have died in the neotatal period .. 11 Consent ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Vigilance Notification for Organs
    NOTIFY - E xploring V igilanc E n otification for o rgans , t issu E s and c E lls NOTIFY Exploring VigilancE notification for organs, tissuEs and cElls A Global Consultation e 10,00 Organised by CNT with the co-sponsorship of WHO and the participation of the EU-funded SOHO V&S Project February 7-9, 2011 NOTIFY Exploring VigilancE notification for organs, tissuEs and cElls A Global Consultation Organised by CNT with the co-sponsorship of WHO and the participation of the EU-funded SOHO V&S Project February 7-9, 2011 Cover Bologna, piazza del Nettuno (photo © giulianax – Fotolia.com) © Testi Centro Nazionale Trapianti © 2011 EDITRICE COMPOSITORI Via Stalingrado 97/2 - 40128 Bologna Tel. 051/3540111 - Fax 051/327877 [email protected] www.editricecompositori.it ISBN 978-88-7794-758-1 Index Part A Bologna Consultation Report ............................................................................................................................................7 Part B Working Group Didactic Papers ......................................................................................................................................57 (i) The Transmission of Infections ..........................................................................................................................59 (ii) The Transmission of Malignancies ....................................................................................................................79 (iii) Adverse Outcomes Associated with Characteristics, Handling and Clinical Errors
    [Show full text]
  • EBAA Medical Standards – October 2016
    Medical Standards These Standards have the approval of the Eye Banking Committee of the American Academy of Ophthalmology October 28, 2016 Published by: EBAA th 1015 18 Street, NW, Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20036, USA www.restoresight.org ©2016. EBAA. All rights reserved. Page 1 EBAA Medical Standards – October 2016 Table of Contents A1.000 Introduction and Purpose ..............................................................................................5 A1.100 Scope ......................................................................................................................5 B1.000 Active Membership .........................................................................................................5 B1.100 Eye Bank Inspection...............................................................................................6 B1.200 Inspections by Official Agencies ...........................................................................6 C1.000 Personnel and Governance .............................................................................................6 C1.100 Director...................................................................................................................6 C1.200 Medical Director ....................................................................................................7 C1.300 Staff Performing Eye Banking Functions ..............................................................8 C1.400 Change in Governance ...........................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Issues in Living-Related Corneal Tissue Transplantation
    Viewpoint Ethical issues in living-related corneal J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2018-105146 on 23 May 2019. Downloaded from tissue transplantation Joséphine Behaegel, 1,2 Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill,1,2 Heather Draper3 1Department of Ophthalmology, ABSTRact injury, typically chemical burns, chronic inflamma- Antwerp University Hospital, The cornea was the first human solid tissue to be tion and certain genetic diseases, the limbal stem Edegem, Belgium 2 transplanted successfully, and is now a common cells may be lost and the cornea becomes vascula- Faculty of Medicine and 5 6 Health Sciences, Dept of procedure in ophthalmic surgery. The grafts come from rised and opaque, leading to blindness (figure 1). Ophthalmology, Visual Optics deceased donors. Corneal therapies are now being In such cases, standard corneal transplants fail and Visual Rehabilitation, developed that rely on tissue from living-related donors. because of the inability to maintain a healthy epithe- University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, This presents new ethical challenges for ophthalmic lium. Limbal stem cell transplantation is designed to Belgium 3Division of Health Sciences, surgeons, who have hitherto been somewhat insulated address this problem by replacing the damaged or Warwick Medical School, from debates in transplantation and donation ethics. lost limbal stem cells (LSC) and restoring the ocular University of Warwick, Coventry, This paper provides the first overview of the ethical surface, which in turn increases the success rates of United Kingdom considerations generated by ocular tissue donation subsequent sight-restoring corneal transplants.7 8 from living donors and suggests how these might Limbal stem cell donations only entail the removal Correspondence to be addressed in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • AMRITA HOSPITALS AMRITA AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR)
    AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS AMRITA AMRITA AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) A Comprehensive A Comprehensive Overview Overview A Comprehensive Overview AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AIMS Ponekkara P.O. Kochi, Kerala, India 682 041 Phone: (91) 484-2801234 Fax: (91) 484-2802020 email: [email protected] website: www.amritahospitals.org Copyright@2018 AMRITA HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi-NCR) A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW A Comprehensive Overview Copyright © 2018 by Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences All rights reserved. No portion of this book, except for brief review, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means —electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without permission of the publisher. Published by: Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences AIMS Ponekkara P.O. Kochi, Kerala 682041 India Phone: (91) 484-2801234 Fax: (91) 484-2802020 email: [email protected] website: www.amritahospitals.org June 2018 2018 ISBN 1-879410-38-9 Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center Kochi, Kerala INDIA AMRITA HOSPITALS KOCHI * FARIDABAD (DELHI-NCR) A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW 2018 Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center Kochi, Kerala INDIA CONTENTS Mission Statement ......................................... 04 Message From The Director ......................... 05 Our Founder and Inspiration Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi .................. 06 Awards and Accreditations .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking
    REVIEW Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking Dominique E. Martin, PhD, MBBS, BA (Hons),* Richard Kelly, MD, BBiomed,† Gary L. A. Jones, BSc (Econ),‡ Heather Machin, RN, MBA,§ and Graeme A. Pollock, PhD, MPH, BSc (Hons)¶ discussion of issues relating to tissue-derived products and Purpose: To review ethical issues that may arise in the setting of musculoskeletal tissue banking, rather than eye banking transnational eye banking activities, such as when exporting or specifically.2,5 As recognized in the recent World Health importing corneal tissue for transplantation. Organization (WHO) Initiative on MPHOs, which aims “to Methods: A principle-based normative analysis of potential common support the development of global consensus on guiding dilemmas in transnational eye banking activities was performed. ethical principles for the donation and management of [MPHOs],”6 a number of ethical concerns are common to Results: Transnational activities in eye banking, like those in other all MPHOs, including ocular tissues used in transplanta- fields involving procurement and use of medical products of human tion.1,7 Common concerns associated with transnational origin, may present a number of ethical issues for policy makers and movement of MPHOs include national self-sufficiency, donor professionals. Key ethical concerns include the potential impact of autonomy, equity in resource distribution, and care of donors export or import activities on self-sufficiency of corneal tissue supply and recipients.1 In this article, we briefly review several within exporting and importing countries; potential disclosure ethical issues that may be associated with transnational eye requirements when obtaining consent or authorization for ocular banking activities, using the example of importation and tissue donation when donations may be exported; and difficulties exportation of corneas for transplantation.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ Transplant Transplants E.G
    New Layout-Dt 14-2-2009 - final.pmd 1 2/14/2009, 5:16 PM FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK / CONTENTS 2 From the Editor’s Desk Dr. Reeta J. Dalal 3 Guest Editorial Dr. Sudeep Shah 4 Cadaver Transplantation Dr. Rasika Sirsat 8 Corneal Transplant Dr. Nisheeta Agarwala & Dr. Pradyna 12 Heart Transplant Dr. Kaushal Pandey 16 Frontiers of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Dr. Jatin Kothari 20 Liver Transplant Dr. Sudeep Shah From the 24 Live Related Renal Transplant Dr. Alan Almeida Editor’s Desk 30 Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) Dr. Asha Kapadia Worldwide tens of 32 Lung Transplant - thousands of lives are Where does it stand today? transformed by the miracle Dr. Manoj Agni of organ donation. Tissue 36 Short History of Organ Transplant transplants e.g. skin, Dr. R. A. Bhalerao cornea, bone-marrow, 38 Hinduja News vessels are invaluable. In 40 Welcome the last half century transplant surgery has transformed from research to life-saving surgery. For every successful transplant there are Editorial Board thousands who are on the waiting list and Dr. Philip Abraham Dr. Tester Ashavaid probably die waiting to receive the graft. Organ Dr. C. Balakrishnan transplants are complicated by scarcity of organ Dr. Sudeep Shah Dr. Gauri Mankekar donors, various ethical and social issues. Editor In this issue Dr. Sudeep Shah, Liver Transplant Dr. Reeta J. Dalal Surgeon at Hinduja Hospital has put together Editor Emeritus articles from various specialities to give you an Dr. V. R. Joshi ‘Update on organ transplants’. Guest Editor Dr. Sudeep Shah Photography Pramod Tandel Dr. Reeta J.
    [Show full text]
  • Could I Be a Living Kidney Donor?
    Could I be a living kidney donor? www.organdonation.nhs.uk [email protected] 0300 123 23 23 “Since donating my kidney a number of people have approached me and told me what an amazing person I am. I don’t feel it, I just feel like a normal person who helped someone a little less fortunate than myself.” Carrie, donated a kidney to stranger in 2014 2 Could I be a living kidney donor? A living kidney donor is a person who gives one of their healthy kidneys to someone with kidney failure who needs a transplant (the recipient). This could be a friend or family member, or someone they do not already know. In the UK living kidney transplants have been performed since 1960 and currently around 1,100 such operations are performed each year, with a very high success rate. A kidney transplant is transformational for someone with kidney disease, whether or not they are already having dialysis treatment. Volunteering to offer a kidney is a wonderful thing to do, but it is also an important decision and there are lots of things for you to consider. We hope this information will answer some of the questions that you may have. You will find a glossary on page 15 that will explain some of the more technical terms or abbreviations that are used if these have not been explained in the text itself. These are underlined to help you. Why do we need more living kidney donors? • There are currently more than 5000 people in UK with kidney disease who are on the National Transplant List in need of a kidney – and the numbers are growing • Hundreds of people in the UK die each year in need of a kidney transplant • Unfortunately there are not enough kidneys donated from people who have died for everyone who needs a transplant • The average waiting time for a kidney transplant from someone who has died is approximately three years.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of the National Transplant Registry 2004 BLOOD and MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
    FIRST REPORT OF THE NATIONAL TRANSPLANT REGISTRY 2004 Editors Hooi L.S. Lela Yasmin Mansor With contributions by: Alan Teh K H, Chan L L, Shamala R, Choong YY, Michael Law SH, Mohamed Ezani, David Chew SP, Ganesalingam K, Lim CB, Tan SS, Goh BL, Hamdan Leman, Suzina Sheikh August 2005 © National Transplant Registry, Malaysia ISSN 1823-5719 Published by: National Transplant Registry 2nd Floor MMA House 124, Jalan Pahang 53000 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Tel : (603) 4045 5948 Fax : (603) 4044 0613 e-mail : [email protected] Website: http://www.mst.org.my This report is copyrighted. However it may be freely reproduced without the permission of the National Transplant Registry. Acknowledgement would be appreciated. Suggested citation is: Hooi L.S., Lela Yasmin Mansor (Eds). First Report of the National Transplant Registry Malaysia 2004. Kuala Lumpur 2005. FOREWORD We are pleased to launch the first report of the National Transplant Registry (NTR). The Registry was formed in November 2003 with the primary aim of establishing a national audit to analyse and understand the demography and outcomes in the complicated field of transplantation. This first report has been made possible by the dedication, hard work and support from the various transplant source providers and data management team. Working in close collaboration with the Clinical Research Centre the NTR has made encouraging progress since its recent formation. We would like to thank the participating centres for their cooperation. Currently the Registry collects data from all centres performing organ and tissue transplantation in this country. Heart, blood and marrow transplantation data is now reported online.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Table of Responses from Competent Authorities
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C6 - Health measures Brussels, 06 February 2007 Summary Table of SANCO C6 CT/gcs D (2007) 360045 Responses from Competent Authorities: Questionnaire on the transposition and implementation of the European Tissues and Cells regulatory framework In preparation of the first meeting of competent authorities on tissues and cells which the Commission convenes in order to exchange experiences in the transposition of the Directives into their national law, competent authorities were invited to complete a questionnaire covering the transposition and implementation of the Tissues and Cells regulatory framework. This table presents responses regarding the situation from the Member States and EEA countries as of 7 February 2007. 1. NAME OF COMPETENT AUTHORITY Member State Competent Authority BE - Belgique / België Federal Agency for Medicinal products and Health products BU - Bulgaria Executive Agency for Transplantation CZ - Ministry of Health Česká Republika DK - Denmark Danish Medicines Agency DE - Deutschland Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Agency for Sera and Vaccines EE - Eesti State Agency of Medicines EL - Elláda 1) Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity, 2) Hellenic Transplant Organisation 3) National Independent Authority for medically Assisted Reproduction ES - España Organización Nacional de Trasplantes – National Transplant Organization (ONT) Commission européenne, B-1049 Brussels – Belgium. Telephone : (32.2) 299 11
    [Show full text]