Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation Review Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation: Donor Evaluation, Recipient Risk, and Outcomes of Transmission SarahL.White,PhD,1 William Rawlinson, FRACP, FRCPA, PhD,2,3 Peter Boan, FRACP, FRCPA,4,5 Vicky Sheppeard, FAFPHM,6 Germaine Wong, FRACP, PhD,7,8,9 Karen Waller, MBBS,1 Helen Opdam, FRACP, FCICM,10,11 John Kaldor, PhD,12 Michael Fink, MD, FRACS,10,13 Deborah Verran, MD, FRACS,14 Angela Webster, PhD, FRCP, FRACP,7,9 Kate Wyburn, FRACP, PhD,1,15 Lindsay Grayson, MD, FRACP, FAFPHM, FRCP, FIDSA,10,13 Allan Glanville, MD, FRACP,16 Nick Cross, MD, PhD,17 Ashley Irish, FRACP,18,19 Toby Coates, FRACP, PhD,20,21 Anthony Griffin, FRACS,22 Greg Snell, MD, FRACP,23 StephenI.Alexander,MD,FRACP,8 Scott Campbell, FRACP, PhD,24 Steven Chadban, FRACP, PhD,1,15 Peter Macdonald, MD, FRACP, PhD,25,26 Paul Manley, FRACP,27 Eva Mehakovic,11 Vidya Ramachandran, MBBS,2 Alicia Mitchell, PhD,16,28,29 and Michael Ison, MD30 Abstract. In 2016, the Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand, with the support of the Australian Government Or- gan and Tissue authority, commissioned a literature review on the topic of infectious disease transmission from deceased donors to recipients of solid organ transplants. The purpose of this review was to synthesize evidence on transmission risks, diagnostic test characteristics, and recipient management to inform best-practice clinical guidelines. The final review, presented as a special supplement in Transplantation Direct, collates case reports of transmission events and other peer-reviewed literature, and summa- rizes current (as of June 2017) international guidelines on donor screening and recipient management. Of particular interest at the time of writing was how to maximize utilization of donors at increased risk for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hep- atitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, given the recent developments, including the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus and improvements in donor screening technologies. The review also covers emerging risks associated with recent epidemics (eg, Zika virus) and the risk of transmission of nonendemic pathogens related to donor travel history or country of origin. Lastly, the implications for recipient consent of expanded utilization of donors at increased risk of blood-borne viral disease transmission are considered. (Transplantation Direct 2018;4: e416; doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000852. Published online 20 December, 2018.) Received 13 August 2018. 11 The Organ and Tissue Authority, Australian Government, Canberra, Australia. Accepted 15 August 2018. 12 Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 1 Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 13 Department of Surgery, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Australia. Melbourne, Australia. 2 Serology and Virology Division, NSW Health Pathology Prince of Wales Hospital, 14 Transplantation Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Sydney, Australia. 15 Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 3 Women's and Children's Health and Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, 16 Department of Thoracic Medicine and Lung Transplantation, St Vincent's Hospi- University of New South Wales Schools of Medicine, Sydney, Australia. tal, Sydney, Australia. 4 Departments of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 17 Department of Nephrology, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch Hos- Perth, Australia. pital, Christchurch, New Zealand. 5 PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Perth, Australia. 18 Department of Nephrology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia. 6 Communicable Diseases Network Australia, New South Wales Health, Sydney, 19 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, UWA Medical School, The University of Australia. Western Australia, Crawley, Australia. 7 Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 20 Renal and Transplantation, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. 8 Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, 21 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Australia. 9 Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 22 Renal Transplantation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 10 Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia. Australia. Transplantation DIRECT ■ 2018 www.transplantationdirect.com 1 2 Transplantation DIRECT ■ 2018 www.transplantationdirect.com he unanticipated transmission of an infectious disease i. donor-derived infectious disease transmission events in re- Tfrom an organ donor to recipient(s) is a rare event; how- cipients of solid organs from deceased donors; ever, when it does occur, it is associated with significant morbid- ii. residual risk of bloodborne virus transmission under dif- ity and mortality.1 Therefore, it is the goal of organ donation ferent deceased donor scenarios; and transplantation programs to minimize such events while si- iii. the impact on recipient outcomes of the transmission of viral, bacterial, parasitic, fungal, and other infectious diseases; multaneously maximizing opportunities for transplantation. iv. diagnostic test availability, modality, and performance, and This goal relies on (i) rational donor screening policies based international guidelines for donor screening; on an understanding of the epidemiology of infectious diseases v. clinical practice strategies for minimizing transmission risk of interest and the performance characteristics of the tests used from increased-risk donors; to diagnose them, and (ii) evidence regarding patient outcomes vi. current international recommendations with respect to re- in the event of disease transmission, to facilitate informed de- cipient management posttransplant in the event of possible cision making with regard to the risk tradeoff between infectious disease transmission; accepting an organ with an increased risk of disease transmis- vii. vigilance and surveillance systems in organ donation sion versus remaining on the waiting list. and transplantation. This literature review summarizes case reports, peer- The potential to transmit bloodborne viruses (BBV)— reviewed literature, and international guidelines on the fol- human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus lowing topics: contributions to the conception and intellectual content of the review, provided 23 Lung Transplant, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. critical revision of drafts, and approved the final version for publication. K.W. made 24 Department of Renal Medicine, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra substantial contributions to the conception and intellectual content of the review, Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia. provided critical revision of drafts, and approved the final version for publication. 25 M.L.G. made substantial contributions to the interpretation of evidence and to the Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. intellectual content of the review, provided critical revision of drafts, and approved 26 St Vincent's Hospital Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, University of New the final version for publication. A.G. made substantial contributions to the South Wales, Sydney, Australia. interpretation of evidence, reviewed the work for important intellectual content, and 27 Kidney Disorders, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland City Hospital, approved the final version for publication. N.C. made substantial contributions to Auckland, New Zealand. the acquisition of information, reviewed the work for important intellectual content, 28 and approved the final version for publication. A.I. made substantial contributions Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia. to the interpretation of evidence, reviewed the work for important intellectual 29 School of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology, Sydney, content, and approved the final version for publication. T.C. made substantial Australia. contributions to the interpretation of evidence, reviewed the work for important 30 Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation, Northwestern Univer- intellectual content, and approved the final version for publication. A.G. made sity Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. substantial contributions to the interpretation of evidence, reviewed the work for important intellectual content, and approved the final version for publication. G.S. This literature review was funded by The Transplantation Society of Australia and made substantial contributions to the interpretation of evidence, reviewed the work New Zealand and the Australian Government Organ and Tissue Authority. for important intellectual content, and approved the final version for publication. None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this work. S.A. made substantial contributions to the interpretation of evidence, reviewed the Disclaimer: The information contained in this document is for general information work for important intellectual content, and approved the final version for only. It is designed to be educational, and is not intended to be, and is not, a publication. S.Ca. made substantial contributions to the interpretation of evidence, complete or definitive statement on any area of medical practice or procedure. reviewed the work for important intellectual content,
Recommended publications
  • Euro GTP Guidance
    EURO­GTP Euro GTP Guidance European Union Project in the framework of the Public Health Program Agreement number: 2007 207 Coordinator: Transplant Services Foundation 1 List of Authors ‐ Euro GTP Project Coordinator TSF ▪ Transplant Services Foundation | Spain Project Partners BISLIFE | Netherlands BTV ▪ Banca Tessuti della Regione Veneto | Italy CBC ▪ Hornhautbank Berlin Charite Universitatsmedizin | Germany EHB ▪ European Homograft Bank | Belgium ESB ▪ Euro Skin Bank | Netherlands HBM ▪ Hornhautbank München Gemeinnutzige | Germany ISS‐CNT ▪ Istituto Superiore di Sanita Centro Nazionale Trapianti | Italy KCBTiK ▪ Krajowe Centrum Bankowania Tkanek I Komórek | Poland QAMH ▪ Queen Astrid Military Hospital | Belgium REGEA ▪ Tampere Yliopisto. University of Tampere | Finland i Table of Contents PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................................................................1 SECTION A: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................................3 A.1. PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 A.2. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 8 A.2.1. FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS FOR RECOVERY...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freezing of Surplus Donated Whole Eyes in the Central Eye Bank of Iran
    RESEARCH Freezing of Surplus Donated Whole Eyes in the Central Eye Bank of Iran Use of Defrosted Corneas for Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Report of Postoperative Eye Bank Data Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi, MD; Mohammad Ali Javadi, MD; Fatemeh Javadi; Tahereh Chamani, MS ABSTRACT especially when a shortage exists for fresh donor corneas for transplantation. PURPOSE: To describe the method of freezing and thaw- KEYWORDS: cornea, freezing, whole eyes, DALK, ing of donated whole eyes (DWEs), which were surplus to eye banks, thawing....................................... requirements in the Central Eye Bank of Iran (CEBI), and to report the 3-year results of using defrosted corneas in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in keratoconic eyes. he Central Eye Bank of Iran (CEBI) is the METHODS: The method of freezing and thawing of only eye bank in Iran and is located in Tehran. surplus DWEs in the CEBI is described. Surplus DWEs Tissue requirements for corneal and scleral at the CEBI were disinfected, processed, and transferred T transplantation in Iran are supplied and preserved to the freezer (-70°C) for long-term preservation. In case 1 of a shortage of fresh and refrigerated corneas for DALK, by the CEBI. There has been an increasing trend in a frozen DWE was defrosted and distributed for trans- corneal transplantation in Iran, from 200 grafts in plantation either as a whole eye in moist chamber or as 1988 to 6,053 in 2012 (unpublished data). Keratoco- an excised corneoscleral disc in Eusol C at 2˚C to 8˚C. nus is the most common indication for penetrating Furthermore, eye bank data of the frozen DWEs as well 1 as postoperative eye bank reports of implementation of keratoplasty in Iran, accounting for 34.5% of cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Research : Code of Practice and Standards
    �;HTA • Human Tissue Authority £ Research Code of Practice and Standards Published: 3 April 2017 Code E: Research Contents Introduction to the Human Tissue Authority Codes of Practice .................................. 3 Introduction to the Research Code ............................................................................. 5 The role of HTA in regulating research under the Human Tissue Act 2004 ............ 5 Scope of this Code .................................................................................................. 5 Offences under the HT Act ...................................................................................... 6 Structure and navigation ......................................................................................... 6 Relevant material and research ................................................................................. 7 What is research? ................................................................................................... 7 What is relevant material? ....................................................................................... 7 Access to tissue from the living ............................................................................... 9 Access to tissue from the deceased ..................................................................... 10 Research involving stillborn babies or infants who have died in the neotatal period .. 11 Consent ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Vigilance Notification for Organs
    NOTIFY - E xploring V igilanc E n otification for o rgans , t issu E s and c E lls NOTIFY Exploring VigilancE notification for organs, tissuEs and cElls A Global Consultation e 10,00 Organised by CNT with the co-sponsorship of WHO and the participation of the EU-funded SOHO V&S Project February 7-9, 2011 NOTIFY Exploring VigilancE notification for organs, tissuEs and cElls A Global Consultation Organised by CNT with the co-sponsorship of WHO and the participation of the EU-funded SOHO V&S Project February 7-9, 2011 Cover Bologna, piazza del Nettuno (photo © giulianax – Fotolia.com) © Testi Centro Nazionale Trapianti © 2011 EDITRICE COMPOSITORI Via Stalingrado 97/2 - 40128 Bologna Tel. 051/3540111 - Fax 051/327877 [email protected] www.editricecompositori.it ISBN 978-88-7794-758-1 Index Part A Bologna Consultation Report ............................................................................................................................................7 Part B Working Group Didactic Papers ......................................................................................................................................57 (i) The Transmission of Infections ..........................................................................................................................59 (ii) The Transmission of Malignancies ....................................................................................................................79 (iii) Adverse Outcomes Associated with Characteristics, Handling and Clinical Errors
    [Show full text]
  • EBAA Medical Standards – October 2016
    Medical Standards These Standards have the approval of the Eye Banking Committee of the American Academy of Ophthalmology October 28, 2016 Published by: EBAA th 1015 18 Street, NW, Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20036, USA www.restoresight.org ©2016. EBAA. All rights reserved. Page 1 EBAA Medical Standards – October 2016 Table of Contents A1.000 Introduction and Purpose ..............................................................................................5 A1.100 Scope ......................................................................................................................5 B1.000 Active Membership .........................................................................................................5 B1.100 Eye Bank Inspection...............................................................................................6 B1.200 Inspections by Official Agencies ...........................................................................6 C1.000 Personnel and Governance .............................................................................................6 C1.100 Director...................................................................................................................6 C1.200 Medical Director ....................................................................................................7 C1.300 Staff Performing Eye Banking Functions ..............................................................8 C1.400 Change in Governance ...........................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Issues in Living-Related Corneal Tissue Transplantation
    Viewpoint Ethical issues in living-related corneal J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2018-105146 on 23 May 2019. Downloaded from tissue transplantation Joséphine Behaegel, 1,2 Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill,1,2 Heather Draper3 1Department of Ophthalmology, ABSTRact injury, typically chemical burns, chronic inflamma- Antwerp University Hospital, The cornea was the first human solid tissue to be tion and certain genetic diseases, the limbal stem Edegem, Belgium 2 transplanted successfully, and is now a common cells may be lost and the cornea becomes vascula- Faculty of Medicine and 5 6 Health Sciences, Dept of procedure in ophthalmic surgery. The grafts come from rised and opaque, leading to blindness (figure 1). Ophthalmology, Visual Optics deceased donors. Corneal therapies are now being In such cases, standard corneal transplants fail and Visual Rehabilitation, developed that rely on tissue from living-related donors. because of the inability to maintain a healthy epithe- University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, This presents new ethical challenges for ophthalmic lium. Limbal stem cell transplantation is designed to Belgium 3Division of Health Sciences, surgeons, who have hitherto been somewhat insulated address this problem by replacing the damaged or Warwick Medical School, from debates in transplantation and donation ethics. lost limbal stem cells (LSC) and restoring the ocular University of Warwick, Coventry, This paper provides the first overview of the ethical surface, which in turn increases the success rates of United Kingdom considerations generated by ocular tissue donation subsequent sight-restoring corneal transplants.7 8 from living donors and suggests how these might Limbal stem cell donations only entail the removal Correspondence to be addressed in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • AMRITA HOSPITALS AMRITA AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR)
    AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS AMRITA AMRITA AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) A Comprehensive A Comprehensive Overview Overview A Comprehensive Overview AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AIMS Ponekkara P.O. Kochi, Kerala, India 682 041 Phone: (91) 484-2801234 Fax: (91) 484-2802020 email: [email protected] website: www.amritahospitals.org Copyright@2018 AMRITA HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi-NCR) A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW A Comprehensive Overview Copyright © 2018 by Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences All rights reserved. No portion of this book, except for brief review, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means —electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without permission of the publisher. Published by: Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences AIMS Ponekkara P.O. Kochi, Kerala 682041 India Phone: (91) 484-2801234 Fax: (91) 484-2802020 email: [email protected] website: www.amritahospitals.org June 2018 2018 ISBN 1-879410-38-9 Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center Kochi, Kerala INDIA AMRITA HOSPITALS KOCHI * FARIDABAD (DELHI-NCR) A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW 2018 Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center Kochi, Kerala INDIA CONTENTS Mission Statement ......................................... 04 Message From The Director ......................... 05 Our Founder and Inspiration Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi .................. 06 Awards and Accreditations .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking
    REVIEW Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking Dominique E. Martin, PhD, MBBS, BA (Hons),* Richard Kelly, MD, BBiomed,† Gary L. A. Jones, BSc (Econ),‡ Heather Machin, RN, MBA,§ and Graeme A. Pollock, PhD, MPH, BSc (Hons)¶ discussion of issues relating to tissue-derived products and Purpose: To review ethical issues that may arise in the setting of musculoskeletal tissue banking, rather than eye banking transnational eye banking activities, such as when exporting or specifically.2,5 As recognized in the recent World Health importing corneal tissue for transplantation. Organization (WHO) Initiative on MPHOs, which aims “to Methods: A principle-based normative analysis of potential common support the development of global consensus on guiding dilemmas in transnational eye banking activities was performed. ethical principles for the donation and management of [MPHOs],”6 a number of ethical concerns are common to Results: Transnational activities in eye banking, like those in other all MPHOs, including ocular tissues used in transplanta- fields involving procurement and use of medical products of human tion.1,7 Common concerns associated with transnational origin, may present a number of ethical issues for policy makers and movement of MPHOs include national self-sufficiency, donor professionals. Key ethical concerns include the potential impact of autonomy, equity in resource distribution, and care of donors export or import activities on self-sufficiency of corneal tissue supply and recipients.1 In this article, we briefly review several within exporting and importing countries; potential disclosure ethical issues that may be associated with transnational eye requirements when obtaining consent or authorization for ocular banking activities, using the example of importation and tissue donation when donations may be exported; and difficulties exportation of corneas for transplantation.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ Transplant Transplants E.G
    New Layout-Dt 14-2-2009 - final.pmd 1 2/14/2009, 5:16 PM FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK / CONTENTS 2 From the Editor’s Desk Dr. Reeta J. Dalal 3 Guest Editorial Dr. Sudeep Shah 4 Cadaver Transplantation Dr. Rasika Sirsat 8 Corneal Transplant Dr. Nisheeta Agarwala & Dr. Pradyna 12 Heart Transplant Dr. Kaushal Pandey 16 Frontiers of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Dr. Jatin Kothari 20 Liver Transplant Dr. Sudeep Shah From the 24 Live Related Renal Transplant Dr. Alan Almeida Editor’s Desk 30 Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) Dr. Asha Kapadia Worldwide tens of 32 Lung Transplant - thousands of lives are Where does it stand today? transformed by the miracle Dr. Manoj Agni of organ donation. Tissue 36 Short History of Organ Transplant transplants e.g. skin, Dr. R. A. Bhalerao cornea, bone-marrow, 38 Hinduja News vessels are invaluable. In 40 Welcome the last half century transplant surgery has transformed from research to life-saving surgery. For every successful transplant there are Editorial Board thousands who are on the waiting list and Dr. Philip Abraham Dr. Tester Ashavaid probably die waiting to receive the graft. Organ Dr. C. Balakrishnan transplants are complicated by scarcity of organ Dr. Sudeep Shah Dr. Gauri Mankekar donors, various ethical and social issues. Editor In this issue Dr. Sudeep Shah, Liver Transplant Dr. Reeta J. Dalal Surgeon at Hinduja Hospital has put together Editor Emeritus articles from various specialities to give you an Dr. V. R. Joshi ‘Update on organ transplants’. Guest Editor Dr. Sudeep Shah Photography Pramod Tandel Dr. Reeta J.
    [Show full text]
  • Could I Be a Living Kidney Donor?
    Could I be a living kidney donor? www.organdonation.nhs.uk [email protected] 0300 123 23 23 “Since donating my kidney a number of people have approached me and told me what an amazing person I am. I don’t feel it, I just feel like a normal person who helped someone a little less fortunate than myself.” Carrie, donated a kidney to stranger in 2014 2 Could I be a living kidney donor? A living kidney donor is a person who gives one of their healthy kidneys to someone with kidney failure who needs a transplant (the recipient). This could be a friend or family member, or someone they do not already know. In the UK living kidney transplants have been performed since 1960 and currently around 1,100 such operations are performed each year, with a very high success rate. A kidney transplant is transformational for someone with kidney disease, whether or not they are already having dialysis treatment. Volunteering to offer a kidney is a wonderful thing to do, but it is also an important decision and there are lots of things for you to consider. We hope this information will answer some of the questions that you may have. You will find a glossary on page 15 that will explain some of the more technical terms or abbreviations that are used if these have not been explained in the text itself. These are underlined to help you. Why do we need more living kidney donors? • There are currently more than 5000 people in UK with kidney disease who are on the National Transplant List in need of a kidney – and the numbers are growing • Hundreds of people in the UK die each year in need of a kidney transplant • Unfortunately there are not enough kidneys donated from people who have died for everyone who needs a transplant • The average waiting time for a kidney transplant from someone who has died is approximately three years.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of the National Transplant Registry 2004 BLOOD and MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
    FIRST REPORT OF THE NATIONAL TRANSPLANT REGISTRY 2004 Editors Hooi L.S. Lela Yasmin Mansor With contributions by: Alan Teh K H, Chan L L, Shamala R, Choong YY, Michael Law SH, Mohamed Ezani, David Chew SP, Ganesalingam K, Lim CB, Tan SS, Goh BL, Hamdan Leman, Suzina Sheikh August 2005 © National Transplant Registry, Malaysia ISSN 1823-5719 Published by: National Transplant Registry 2nd Floor MMA House 124, Jalan Pahang 53000 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Tel : (603) 4045 5948 Fax : (603) 4044 0613 e-mail : [email protected] Website: http://www.mst.org.my This report is copyrighted. However it may be freely reproduced without the permission of the National Transplant Registry. Acknowledgement would be appreciated. Suggested citation is: Hooi L.S., Lela Yasmin Mansor (Eds). First Report of the National Transplant Registry Malaysia 2004. Kuala Lumpur 2005. FOREWORD We are pleased to launch the first report of the National Transplant Registry (NTR). The Registry was formed in November 2003 with the primary aim of establishing a national audit to analyse and understand the demography and outcomes in the complicated field of transplantation. This first report has been made possible by the dedication, hard work and support from the various transplant source providers and data management team. Working in close collaboration with the Clinical Research Centre the NTR has made encouraging progress since its recent formation. We would like to thank the participating centres for their cooperation. Currently the Registry collects data from all centres performing organ and tissue transplantation in this country. Heart, blood and marrow transplantation data is now reported online.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Table of Responses from Competent Authorities
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C6 - Health measures Brussels, 06 February 2007 Summary Table of SANCO C6 CT/gcs D (2007) 360045 Responses from Competent Authorities: Questionnaire on the transposition and implementation of the European Tissues and Cells regulatory framework In preparation of the first meeting of competent authorities on tissues and cells which the Commission convenes in order to exchange experiences in the transposition of the Directives into their national law, competent authorities were invited to complete a questionnaire covering the transposition and implementation of the Tissues and Cells regulatory framework. This table presents responses regarding the situation from the Member States and EEA countries as of 7 February 2007. 1. NAME OF COMPETENT AUTHORITY Member State Competent Authority BE - Belgique / België Federal Agency for Medicinal products and Health products BU - Bulgaria Executive Agency for Transplantation CZ - Ministry of Health Česká Republika DK - Denmark Danish Medicines Agency DE - Deutschland Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Agency for Sera and Vaccines EE - Eesti State Agency of Medicines EL - Elláda 1) Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity, 2) Hellenic Transplant Organisation 3) National Independent Authority for medically Assisted Reproduction ES - España Organización Nacional de Trasplantes – National Transplant Organization (ONT) Commission européenne, B-1049 Brussels – Belgium. Telephone : (32.2) 299 11
    [Show full text]