DOCSLIB.ORG

Late Cretaceous Antarctic Fish Diversity 85

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Late Cretaceous Antarctic Fish Diversity 85 06_SP258 Kriwet (to_d) 25/5/06 9:11 am Page 83 Late Cretaceous Antarctic fish diversity J. KRIWET1, J. M. LIRIO2, H. J. NUÑEZ2, E. PUCEAT3 & C. LÉCUYER3 1Museum of Natural History, Palaeontology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Instituto Antártico Argentino, Cerrito 1248, Capital Federal (1010), Argentina 3UMR 5125 – CNRS, UFR Sciences de la Terre, Bat 402 (Géode), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 27–43 Bd du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne cédex, France Abstract: New material from the Santa Marta Formation (late Coniacian–?early Maas- trichtian) of James Ross Island contributes significantly to the current knowledge of Late Cretaceous Antarctic fish diversity. The taxon list for the Santa Marta Formation is extended, and new records of neoselachians and teleosts are reported. The stratigraphic ranges of some previously known taxa are enlarged, and the palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology of Late Cretaceous Antarctic fishes are discussed. Top predators that occupied the higher levels in the food chain along with marine tetrapods dominate the marine faunas from the Santa Marta and López de Bertodano formations. The only fish adapted to crushing hard-shelled invertebrates were the chimeroids. Rays, an important component of marine fish associations, as well as fish from lower trophic levels, remain unknown from the Late Cretaceous of Antarctica. Fossil fish remains have long been known from chimeroids, selachians and bony fish have been the extensive Cretaceous marine deposits of the reported from the Marambio Group of James James Ross Basin on the NE flank of the Antarc- Ross and Seymour islands (Woodward 1908; tic Peninsula (Fig. 1a). The first fish fossils were Grande & Eastman 1986; Cione & Medina collected during the 1901–1903 Swedish South 1987; Grande & Chatterjee 1987; Richter & Polar Expedition and were subsequently Ward 1990; Stahl & Chatterjee 1999, 2002). described by Woodward (1908). The James Ross These few published studies indicate that our Basin is one of a series of largely back-arc basins knowledge of Cretaceous fish faunas in the high that formed in the southernmost South southern latitudes, compared to other regions, is American–Antarctic Peninsula region during still very incomplete. Recent fieldwork by two the Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic (Riding & Crame of the authors (J. M. Lirio, H. J. Nuñez) yielded 2002), and their origin is closely related to the new fish material from the Late Cretaceous early stages of Gondwana break-up (Hathway Santa Marta Formation of James Ross Island. 2000). The islands forming the James Ross Island Additional unpublished material collected by Group comprise an extensive and remarkably M. Richter (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) and J. J. fossiliferous Cretaceous–Palaeogene sedimen- Hooker (Natural History Museum, London, tary succession, including a well-preserved UK) during the ‘James Ross Island Scientific Cretaceous–Tertiary (K/T) boundary section on Cruise’ of the British Antarctic Survey in 1989, Seymour Island (Zinsmeister et al. 1989; Zins- and housed in the Natural History Museum, meister 1998; Crame et al. 1991). Consequently, London, was also examined. the James Ross Island Group is important in It is the purpose of this paper to review the reconstructing global Cretaceous and Palaeo- current state of knowledge of Antarctic Creta- gene palaeoclimatic and palaeobiological ceous fish fossils and to present new material. In changes (Ditchfield et al. 1994; Crame et al. 1996; addition, this study provides new insights into Huber 1998; Riding & Crame 2002). Antarctic fossil fish communities and biogeog- The regressive Cretaceous megasequence of raphy as a basis for future investigations. the James Ross Basin is divided into three prin- cipal lithostratigraphic groups: the basal Gustav Geological and stratigraphic framework (Aptian–Coniacian); the Marambio (Coniacian– Danian); and the Seymour Island (Palaeogene) The Marambio Group is exposed in both groups (e.g. Crame et al. 1991; Riding & Crame northern James Ross, Vega and Humps islands 2002). Late Cretaceous fish remains comprising in the north and southern James Ross, Snow From: FRANCIS, J. E., PIRRIE,D.& CRAME, J.A. (eds) 2006. Cretaceous–Tertiary High-Latitude Palaeoenvironments, James Ross Basin, Antarctica. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 258, 83–100. 0305–8719/06/$15 © The Geological Society of London 2006. 06_SP258 Kriwet (to_d) 25/5/06 9:11 am Page 84 84 J. KRIWET ET AL. Fig. 1. Sketch maps showing the location of the Antarctic Peninsula (inset: arrow) and study area. (a) Location of James Ross Island east of the Antarctic Peninsula. The rectangle indicates the study area. (b) Collecting sites in the Santa Marta Formation on northern James Ross Island. B specifies the Argentinean collecting site of Lachman Crags specimens and G the one of Herbert Sound specimens. The asterisk shows the collecting site of the British Antarctic Survey expedition. Hill, Seymour and Cockburn islands in the south that crops out on northern James Ross Island (Olivero et al. 1986, 1992; Lirio et al. 1989; Pirrie between Brandy Bay and Santa Marta Cove et al. 1991, 1997). Both areas are separated by a (Fig. 1b) represents volcaniclastic, shallow- major fault causing extensive repetition of the marine fan and shelf sediments that were stratigraphical sequences. Four formations are deposited adjacent to an active volcanic arc included in the Marambio Group (in strati- (Fig. 1a). This is the type area for the Santa Marta graphical order): Santa Marta, Snow Hill Island, Formation, as defined by Olivero et al. (1986), López de Bertodano and Sobral formations and the base of the Santa Marta Formation is (Pirrie et al. 1997). The Santa Marta Formation late Coniacian in age (McArthur et al. 2000). 06_SP258 Kriwet (to_d) 25/5/06 9:11 am Page 85 LATE CRETACEOUS ANTARCTIC FISH DIVERSITY 85 The lower part (c. 500 m), which consists of gamated beds (Scasso et al. 1991). Further mudstones, siltstones and sandstones together published records from the Santa Marta and with rare conglomerates, was named the Alpha López de Bertodano formations were scruti- Member by Olivero et al. (1986). The following nized and used to reconstruct the diversity approximately 350 m-thick Beta Member is changes of Antarctic fish in the Late Cretaceous. characterized by an increased proportion of As the exact stratigraphic age of the sampled conglomeratic interbeds; these are up to 4 m horizons is still unresolved, the faunas were thick and poorly sorted. Because of their very divided into those coming from the (Beta similar lithostratigraphic appearance, Crame et Member) upper part of the Lachman Crags al. (1991) united the Alpha and Beta members Member and those from the Herbert Sound within the Lachman Crags Member. The Member. It is assumed that all this material is topmost 250 m-thick Gamma Member of Campanian in age. The terminology for sharks Olivero et al. (1986), comprising mainly fine- used herein follows that of Cappetta (1987); the grained cross-bedded sandstones and shell systematic scheme for sharks is based on coquinas, was named the Herbert Sound Carvalho (1996) and that for teleosts follows Member by Crame et al. (1991). The lower part Nelson (1994). of the Lachman Crags Member (Alpha member) Abbreviations: BMNH, Natural History is late Coniacian–early Campanian in age, and Museum, London. The prefix BAS indicates the upper part (Beta Member) is probably material collected by the British Antarctic early–late Campanian. A late Campanian–?early Survey. IAA-IRJ2000-1–IAA-IRJ2001-27 – Maastrichtian age is assigned to the Herbert material housed in the collection of the Instituto Sound (Gamma) Member, based on ammonites, Antartico Argentino. other fossils and strontium isotope dating (Crame et al. 1991, 1999; Olivero et al. 1992; Previous research Olivero & Medina 2000). Lirio et al. (1989) established the 435 m-thick The majority of previous studies on Late Cret- Rabot Formation, which is characterized by less aceous Antarctic fish concentrated on records prominent coarse-grained beds and by the from the López de Bertodano Formation of absence of coquinas and carbonaceous plant Seymour Island (e.g. Woodward 1908; Grande material in the Rabot Point–Hamilton Point & Eastman 1986; Grande & Chatterjee 1987). area of SE James Ross Island. However, Crame The only account of Late Cretaceous fish from et al. (1991) assigned member status to this unit James Ross Island is that of Richter & Ward and Pirrie et al. (1997) transferred part of it to (1990), who described material from the ‘Beta’ the Hamilton Point Member. Precise correla- (Lachman Crags) and ‘Gamma’ (Herbert tion of these members to those of the northern Sound) members of the Santa Marta Formation, part of the island is difficult, but it would appear in the northern part of James Ross Island. The that the Rabot Member is the lateral equivalent fish association of the Lachman Crags Member of both the upper Lachman Crags and lower is extremely low in taxonomic diversity. Richter Herbert Sound members, and probably ranges & Ward (1990) reported the presence of hexa- in age from the early to the late Campanian. The nchiforms (Chlamydoselachus thomsoni, Noti- Hamilton Point Member is ?mid–late Campan- danodon dentatus) and synechodontiforms ian in age (Pirrie et al. 1997). (Sphenodus sp.), based on three isolated teeth and additional unidentified selachian vertebrae Material and methods derived from conglomerates and coquinas. The Herbert
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synechodontiform Sharks (Chondrichthyes, Neoselachii) from the Upper Cretaceous of Antarctica
    Mesozoic Fishes 4 – Homology and Phylogeny, G. Arratia, H.-P. Schultze & M. V. H. Wilson (eds.): pp. 455-467, 3 figs. © 2008 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich PFEIL, München, Germany – ISBN 978-3-89937-080-5 Synechodontiform sharks (Chondrichthyes, Neoselachii) from the Upper Cretaceous of Antarctica Stefanie KLUG, Jürgen KRIWET, Juan M. LIRIO & Hector J. NUÑEZ Abstract The taxonomy of Upper Cretaceous synechodontiform sharks from the James Ross Basin, northern Antarctica, is reviewed. All material is from the Santa Marta Formation (late Coniacian – latest Campanian) of James Ross Island and contributes significantly to our knowledge of synechodontiform diversity and biogeographic patterns. Synechodontiforms are represented by two taxa, Sphenodus and Paraorthacodus. The teeth of the Antarctic Sphenodus species differ from most known species assigned to this genus. However, the imperfect preservation does not allow any specific identification of this Antarctic shark. The size of its teeth indicates that this shark probably measured at least 5 m in total length. A new species, Paraorthacodus antarcticus, is introduced. Paraorthacodus is confined to the Santa Marta Formation (Santonian to early Campanian Lachman Crags and late Campanian to early Maastrichtian Herbert Sound members), whereas Sphenodus occurs in the Herbert Sound Member and the Maastrichtian López de Bertodano Formation. The occurrence of synechodontiform sharks in the James Ross Basin correlates with an interval of enlargement of the trans-equatorial Tethyan seaway within the Coniacian- Maastrichtian interval. The absence of all synechodontiforms in Antarctica after the K/T boundary, conversely, concurs with a drop in surface water temperatures. Introduction Synechodontiform sharks are an extinct group of basal neoselachians (DUFFIN & WARD 1993) and in- clude at least three families, Orthacodontidae, Palaeospinacidae and Pseudonotidanidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers in Press
    Papers in Press “Papers in Press” includes peer-reviewed, accepted manuscripts of research articles, reviews, and short notes to be published in Paleontological Research. They have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the publication style of Paleontological Research. As soon as they are printed, they will be removed from this website. Please note they can be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI, as follows: Humblet, M. and Iryu, Y. 2014: Pleistocene coral assemblages on Irabu-jima, South Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Paleontological Research, doi: 10.2517/2014PR020. doi:10.2517/2018PR013 Features and paleoecological significance of the shark fauna from the Upper Cretaceous Hinoshima Formation, Himenoura Group, Southwest Japan Accepted Naoshi Kitamura 4-8-7 Motoyama, Chuo-ku Kumamoto, Kumamoto 860-0821, Japan (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The shark fauna of the Upper Cretaceous Hinoshima Formation (Santonian: 86.3–83.6 Ma) of the manuscriptHimenoura Group (Kamiamakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture, Kyushu, Japan) was investigated based on fossil shark teeth found at five localities: Himedo Park, Kugushima, Wadanohana, Higashiura, and Kotorigoe. A detailed geological survey and taxonomic analysis was undertaken, and the habitat, depositional environment, and associated mollusks of each locality were considered in the context of previous studies. Twenty-one species, 15 genera, 11 families, and 6 orders of fossil sharks are recognized from the localities. This assemblage is more diverse than has previously been reported for Japan, and Lamniformes and Hexanchiformes were abundant. Three categories of shark fauna are recognized: a coastal region (Himedo Park; probably a breeding site), the coast to the open sea (Kugushima and Wadanohana), and bottom-dwelling or near-seafloor fauna (Kugushima, Wadanohana, Higashiura, and Kotorigoe).
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Families J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A COMPENDIUM OF FOSSIL MARINE FAMILIES J. JOHN SEPKOSKI, JR. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago REVIEWERS FOR THIS PUBLICATION: Robert Gernant, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee David M. Raup, Field Museum of Natural History Frederick R. Schram, San Diego Natural History Museum Peter M. Sheehan, Milwaukee Public Museum ISBN 0-893260-081-9 Milwaukee Public Museum Press Published by the Order of the Board of Trustees CONTENTS Abstract ---- ---------- -- - ----------------------- 2 Introduction -- --- -- ------ - - - ------- - ----------- - - - 2 Compendium ----------------------------- -- ------ 6 Protozoa ----- - ------- - - - -- -- - -------- - ------ - 6 Porifera------------- --- ---------------------- 9 Archaeocyatha -- - ------ - ------ - - -- ---------- - - - - 14 Coelenterata -- - -- --- -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - - -- -- - -- 17 Platyhelminthes - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - - - 24 Rhynchocoela - ---- - - - - ---- --- ---- - - ----------- - 24 Priapulida ------ ---- - - - - -- - - -- - ------ - -- ------ 24 Nematoda - -- - --- --- -- - -- --- - -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 24 Mollusca ------------- --- --------------- ------ 24 Sipunculida ---------- --- ------------ ---- -- --- - 46 Echiurida ------ - --- - - - - - --- --- - -- --- - -- - - ---
    [Show full text]
  • Octavio Mateus
    Foster, J.R. and Lucas, S. G., eds., 2006, Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36. 223 LATE JURASSIC DINOSAURS FROM THE MORRISON FORMATION (USA), THE LOURINHÃ AND ALCOBAÇA FORMATIONS (PORTUGAL), AND THE TENDAGURU BEDS (TANZANIA): A COMPARISON OCTÁVIO MATEUS Museu da Lourinhã, Rua João Luis de Moura, 2530-157 Lourinhã, Portugal. Phone: +351.261 413 995; Fax: +351.261 423 887; Email: [email protected]; and Centro de Estudos Geológicos, FCT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Abstract—The Lourinhã and Alcobaça formations (in Portugal), Morrison Formation (in North America) and Tendaguru Beds (in Tanzania) are compared. These three Late Jurassic areas, dated as Kimmeridgian to Tithonian are similar paleoenvironmentally and faunally. Four dinosaur genera are shared between Portugal and the Morrison (Allosaurus, Torvosaurus, Ceratosaurus and Apatosaurus), as well as all non-avian dinosaur families. Episodic dis- persal occurred until at least the Late Jurassic. The Portuguese dinosaurs did not developed dwarfism and are as large as Morrison and Tendaguru dinosaurs. Resumo em português—São comparadas as Formações de Lourinhã e Alcobaça (em Portugal), Formação de Morrison (na América do Norte) e as Tendaguru Beds (na Tanzânia). Estas três áreas do Jurássico Superior (Kimmeridgiano/ Titoniano) têm muitas semelhanças relativamente aos paleoambientes. Quatro géneros de dinossauros são comuns a Portugal e Morrison (Allosaurus, Torvosaurus, Ceratosaurus e Apatosaurus), assim como todas as famílias de dinossauros não-avianos. Episódios migratórios ocorreram pelo menos até ao Jurássico Superior. Os dinossauros de Portugal não desenvolveram nanismo e eram tão grandes como os dinossauros de Morrison e Tendaguru.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 15 Phylum Chordata Chordates are placed in the superphylum Deuterostomia. The possible rela- tionships of the chordates and deuterostomes to other metazoans are dis- cussed in Halanych (2004). He restricts the taxon of deuterostomes to the chordates and their proposed immediate sister group, a taxon comprising the hemichordates, echinoderms, and the wormlike Xenoturbella. The phylum Chordata has been used by most recent workers to encompass members of the subphyla Urochordata (tunicates or sea-squirts), Cephalochordata (lancelets), and Craniata (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). The Cephalochordata and Craniata form a mono- phyletic group (e.g., Cameron et al., 2000; Halanych, 2004). Much disagree- ment exists concerning the interrelationships and classification of the Chordata, and the inclusion of the urochordates as sister to the cephalochor- dates and craniates is not as broadly held as the sister-group relationship of cephalochordates and craniates (Halanych, 2004). Many excitingCOPYRIGHTED fossil finds in recent years MATERIAL reveal what the first fishes may have looked like, and these finds push the fossil record of fishes back into the early Cambrian, far further back than previously known. There is still much difference of opinion on the phylogenetic position of these new Cambrian species, and many new discoveries and changes in early fish systematics may be expected over the next decade. As noted by Halanych (2004), D.-G. (D.) Shu and collaborators have discovered fossil ascidians (e.g., Cheungkongella), cephalochordate-like yunnanozoans (Haikouella and Yunnanozoon), and jaw- less craniates (Myllokunmingia, and its junior synonym Haikouichthys) over the 15 06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 16 16 Fishes of the World last few years that push the origins of these three major taxa at least into the Lower Cambrian (approximately 530–540 million years ago).
    [Show full text]
  • Shark) Dental Morphology During the Early Mesozoic Dynamik Av Selachian (Haj) Tandmorfologi Under Tidig Mesozoisk
    Examensarbete vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper Degree Project at the Department of Earth Sciences ISSN 1650-6553 Nr 399 Dynamics of Selachian (Shark) Dental Morphology During the Early Mesozoic Dynamik av Selachian (haj) tandmorfologi under Tidig Mesozoisk Alexander Paxinos INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES Examensarbete vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper Degree Project at the Department of Earth Sciences ISSN 1650-6553 Nr 399 Dynamics of Selachian (Shark) Dental Morphology During the Early Mesozoic Dynamik av Selachian (haj) tandmorfologi under Tidig Mesozoisk Alexander Paxinos ISSN 1650-6553 Copyright © Alexander Paxinos Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2017 Abstract Dynamics of Selachian (Shark) Dental Morphology During the Early Mesozoic Alexander Paxinos The ancestors of all modern day sharks and rays (Neoselachii) may have appeared during the Late Palaeozoic, but their major diversification happened sometime during the Early Mesozoic. Taxonomic evidence places the first neoselachian diversification in the Early Jurassic. Taxonomic diversity analyses, however, are often affected by incompleteness of the fossil record and sampling biases. On the other hand, the range of morphological variation (disparity) offers a different perspective for studying evolutionary patterns across time. Disparity analyses are much more resilient to sampling biases than diversity analyses, and disparity has the potential to provide a more ecologically-relevant context.
    [Show full text]
  • A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Germany
    N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 267/1, 117–124 Article Published online December 2012 A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Germany Detlev Thies and Rolf Bernhard Hauff with 1 figure Thies, D. & hauff, R.B. (2013): A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Ger- many. – N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 267: 117–124; Stuttgart. Abstract: A Speiballen (regurgitated compacted mass of indigestible stomach contents) from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of Ohmden, South Germany contains remains of four specimens of the actinopterygian Dapedium sp., the specific identity of which remains obscure, and a lower jaw of a specimen identified as Lepidotes sp. A list of five suitable characters is proposed to distinguish fossil Speiballen containing specimens from other vertebrate fossils. Large, potentially piscivorous animals in the Posidonia Shale ecosystem comprise chondrichthyans (Hybodus), other actinoptery- gians (pachycormiforms) and marine reptiles (crocodilians, ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs). Only juvenile ichthyosaurs (Stenopterygius) are known to have preyed on Dapedium. Available data are, however, insufficient to clearly identify the Speiballen producer. The heavy scale armour of basal neoptery- gians such as Dapedium undoubtedly hampered digestion of these fishes and in this way provided additional protection against predators. Key words: Jurassic, Fossillagerstätte, Holzmaden, ecosytem, predation. 1. Introduction English equivalent of the German term ‘Speiballen’ (or ‘Gewölle’, which means the same) does not seem to Speiballen are understood to be regurgitated com- exist. Burrow & Turner (2010) described an assem- pacted masses of indigestible stomach contents. They blage of skeletal element, tooth whorls and scales of are released in the form of gastric pellets through the the acanthodian Nostolepis scotica from the Early De- pharynx in contrast to faeces that represent intestinal vonian of Scotland comparable in terms of taphonomy contents that are excreted through the anus.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Biogeography of the Late Cretaceous Vertebrates of India: Comparison of Geophysical and Paleontological Data
    Khosla, A. and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2016, Cretaceous Period: Biotic Diversity and Biogeography. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 71. 317 HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE LATE CRETACEOUS VERTEBRATES OF INDIA: COMPARISON OF GEOPHYSICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL DATA OMKAR VERMA1, ASHU KHOSLA2, FRANCISCO J. GOIN3 AND JASDEEP KAUR2 1Geology Discipline Group, School of Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi – 110 068, India, e-mail: omkarverma@ ignou.ac.in; 2Department of Geology, Centre for Advanced Studies, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh – 160014, India, e-mail: [email protected], e-mail: [email protected]; 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas and División Paleontología Vertebrados, Museo de Ciencias Naturales de La Plata, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract—The Cretaceous was a special time for the Indian plate as it was separated from Gondwana landmasses and started its northward journey across the Tethys Sea towards the Equator. The northward movement of this plate implied shifting latitudes and climate belts, until it finally collided with Asia during the early Cenozoic. Geophysical data and plate tectonic models show that after splitting from Gondwana, the Indian plate remained as an isolated continent for more than 45 Ma during the Cretaceous; thus, it predicts a remarkable biotic endemism for the continent. Paleontological data on the Cretaceous vertebrates of India is best known for Maastrichtian time; in turn, the pre-Maastrichtian record is very poor—it contains very few fossils of fishes and marine reptiles. The Maastrichtian fossil record comprises vertebrates of Gondwana and Laurasian affinities and some endemic, ancient lineages as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoselachians from the Danian (Early Paleocene) of Denmark
    Neoselachians from the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark JAN S. ADOLFSSEN and DAVID J. WARD Adolfssen, J.S. and Ward, D.J. 2015. Neoselachians from the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark. Acta Palaeonto- logica Polonica 60 (2): 313–338. A diverse elasmobranch fauna was collected from the early Danian Rødvig Formation and the early to middle Danian Stevns Klint Formation at Stevns Klint and from the middle Danian Faxe Formation at Faxe, Denmark. Teeth from 27 species of sharks are described including the earliest records of Chlamydoselachus and Heptranchias howelli from Europe. The fauna collected at the Faxe quarry is rich in large species of shark including Sphenodus lundgreni and Cretalamna appendiculata and includes no fewer than four species of Hexanchiformes. The species collected yield an interesting insight into shark diversity in the Boreal Sea during the earliest Paleogene. The early Danian fauna recorded from the Cerithium Limestone represents an impoverished Maastrichtian fauna, whereas the fauna found in the slightly younger bryozoan limestone is representative of a pronounced cold water fauna. Several species that hitherto have only been known from the Late Cretaceous have been identified, clearly indicating that the K–T boundary was not the end of the Cretaceous fauna; it lingered and survived into the early Danian. Key words: Chondrichthyes, Faxe Formation, Cerithium Limestone, Danian, Paleocene, Denmark. Jan S. Adolfssen [[email protected]], Natural History Museum of Denmark, Østervoldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copen hagen, Denmark. David. J. Ward [[email protected]], Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK. Received 21 October 2012, accepted 22 May 2013, available online 24 May 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
    European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fishes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fishes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fishes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fishes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae. Keywords. Nomenclature, ICZN, Vertebrata, Agnatha, Gnathostomata.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Phylogeny of Synechodontiform Sharks (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) with Comments on the Origin and Early Evolution of Neoselachii
    Morphology and Phylogeny of Synechodontiform Sharks (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) with Comments on the Origin and Early Evolution of Neoselachii Stefanie Klug Morphology and Phylogeny of Synechodontiform Sharks (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) with Comments on the Origin and Early Evolution of Neoselachii Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) in der Wissenschaftsdisziplin Geologie / Paläontologie vorgelegt im Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin von Dipl.-Geol. Stefanie Klug Berlin, Dezember 2008 Tag der Disputation 20. April 2009 1. Gutachter Prof. Dr. Helmut Keupp Deparment of Earth Sciences, Geological Sciences, Palaeontology Free University Berlin Malteserstrasse 74-100, Haus D 12249 Berlin, Germany 2. Gutachter Prof. Dr. Bettina Reichenbacher Department of Geo- and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Richard-Wagner-Strasse 10 80333 Munich, Germany To my family for their permanent support, continuous encouragement and always believing in me Hiermit versichere ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit ohne Hilfe Dritter und ohne Verwendung anderer als der angeführten Hilfsmittel und Quellen angefertigt habe, und dass die Arbeit in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form noch keiner anderen Prüfungs- behörde vorgelegen hat. Alle Ausführungen der Arbeit die wörtlich oder sinngemäß übernommen wurden, sind entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Berlin, Dezember 2008 Taxonomic Disclaimer This doctoral thesis is produced only for the purpose of a
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
    © European Journal of Taxonomy; download unter http://www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu; www.zobodat.at European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fi shes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fi shes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fi shes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fi shes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae.
    [Show full text]