Mauritius Health Expenditure Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Mauritius Health expenditure profile HEALTH SPENDING IN BRIEF WHO PAYS FOR HEALTH? 0.2% 1.5% Health spending (% of GDP) 5.7 6.0% Health expenditure per capita (US$) 553 Public 44.1% Out-of-pocket Public spending on health per capita (US$) 244 Voluntary prepayment 48.2% External Other GDP per capita (US$) 9,626 Life expectancy, both sexes (years) 74 RICHER COUNTRIES SPEND MORE ON HEALTH… …BUT NOT NECESSARILY AS A SHARE OF GDP 10,000 25 20 1,000 15 10 100 Health spending % of GDP 5 Health spending per capita (US$, log scale) 10 0 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 GDP per capita (US$, log scale) GDP per capita (US$, log scale) MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING ON HEALTH IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOWER OUT-OF-POCKET SPENDING DOES GOVERNMENT SPEND ENOUGH ON HEALTH? 100 600 15 80 400 10 60 % US$ 40 200 5 20 Out-of-pocket spending % of health 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Public spending on health % of GDP Health spending per capita (US$, bars) Government health spending % of total government spending (line) Mauritius PRIORITY OF HEALTH IN BUDGET ALLOCATION IS A POLITICAL CHOICE 30 20 10 Government health spending % of total government spending 0 Iraq Fiji Iran China Peru Cuba Nauru Tonga Tuvalu Gabon Turkey BrazilMexico SerbiaBelizeSamoa Guyana Belarus Albania Algeria Croatia Panama DominicaMalaysia Grenada Mauritius EcuadorRomaniaBulgaria Jamaica ColombiaNamibiaLebanonThailand Paraguay Maldives Azerbaijan Botswana Macedonia Suriname Costa Rica Saint Lucia Kazakhstan South Africa Cook Islands Turkmenistan Marshall Islands Equatorial Guinea Russian Federation Dominican Republic St Vincent & Grenadines Bosnia and Herzegovina IS RELIANCE ON OUT-OF-POCKET SPENDING DECREASING OVER TIME? 100 80 60 40 20 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Public External Other Voluntary prepayment Out-of-pocket WHEN PUBLIC SOURCES SPEND MORE ON HEALTH, DO HOUSEHOLDS SPEND LESS? 12,500 5 10,000 4 7,500 3 5,000 2 2,500 1 % of GDP (lines) GDP per capita (US$, bars) 0 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 GDP per capita (US$, bars) Public spending on health (% of GDP) Out-of-pocket spending (% of GDP) DOES INCREASING AID CROWD OUT PUBLIC SPENDING FROM DOMESTIC SOURCES? EXTERNAL PUBLIC 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 300 200 100 0 0 100 200 300 Per capita (US$) Per capita (US$) Source: Global Health Expenditure Database. Data are for 2016 unless otherwise specified..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE Soviet Military Policy In
NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE Soviet Military Policy in the Third World tnlit ..2.1'P.Oetbbei41976'4 T October 1975, the Soviets initiated an air and sealift from the USSR to help its client and in January 1976 began providing an airlift for Cuban forces between Cuba and Angola. 94. The Soviets evidently believe that the victory of a Soviet-supported national liberation movement has increased Soviet prestige in the Third World. The Soviets probably hope that Angola—where a substan- tial Cuban presence will probably remain for some [Omitted here is text unrelated to Africa.] time—may also assist the USSR in providing Soviets an entree to other national liberation movements in southern Africa—such as SWAPO. In October 1976 the Soviets signed a treaty of friendship and coopera- tion to consolidate their political position. In addition, they may hope to obtain access to port and air facilities as an alternative to those in Guinea. 95. Mozambique. Although not as extensive as that of the Chinese, Soviet aid in the form of military equipment, training, and funds assisted the Mozam- bique Liberation Front (FRELIMO) to come to power when Mozambique achieved independence in June 1975. FRELIMO will probably continue to receive substantial financial and military aid both from the USSR and the PRC. Mozambique provides training and base areas for guerrilla operations against - the white minority government of Rhodesia, an B. Africa activity to which the Soviets have given both military and political support. President Machel kept the 92. In absolute terms, Soviet military aid to sub- Soviets at arm's length immediately after independ- Saharan Africa is quite small.
[Show full text]
United Arab Emirates (Uae)
Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: United Arab Emirates, July 2007 COUNTRY PROFILE: UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) July 2007 COUNTRY اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴّﺔ اﻟﻤﺘّﺤﺪة (Formal Name: United Arab Emirates (Al Imarat al Arabiyah al Muttahidah Dubai , أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ (The seven emirates, in order of size, are: Abu Dhabi (Abu Zaby .اﻹﻣﺎرات Al ,ﻋﺠﻤﺎن Ajman , أ مّ اﻟﻘﻴﻮﻳﻦ Umm al Qaywayn , اﻟﺸﺎرﻗﺔ (Sharjah (Ash Shariqah ,دﺑﻲّ (Dubayy) .رأس اﻟﺨﻴﻤﺔ and Ras al Khaymah ,اﻟﻔﺠﻴﺮة Fajayrah Short Form: UAE. اﻣﺮاﺗﻰ .(Term for Citizen(s): Emirati(s أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ .Capital: Abu Dhabi City Major Cities: Al Ayn, capital of the Eastern Region, and Madinat Zayid, capital of the Western Region, are located in Abu Dhabi Emirate, the largest and most populous emirate. Dubai City is located in Dubai Emirate, the second largest emirate. Sharjah City and Khawr Fakkan are the major cities of the third largest emirate—Sharjah. Independence: The United Kingdom announced in 1968 and reaffirmed in 1971 that it would end its treaty relationships with the seven Trucial Coast states, which had been under British protection since 1892. Following the termination of all existing treaties with Britain, on December 2, 1971, six of the seven sheikhdoms formed the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The seventh sheikhdom, Ras al Khaymah, joined the UAE in 1972. Public holidays: Public holidays other than New Year’s Day and UAE National Day are dependent on the Islamic calendar and vary from year to year. For 2007, the holidays are: New Year’s Day (January 1); Muharram, Islamic New Year (January 20); Mouloud, Birth of Muhammad (March 31); Accession of the Ruler of Abu Dhabi—observed only in Abu Dhabi (August 6); Leilat al Meiraj, Ascension of Muhammad (August 10); first day of Ramadan (September 13); Eid al Fitr, end of Ramadan (October 13); UAE National Day (December 2); Eid al Adha, Feast of the Sacrifice (December 20); and Christmas Day (December 25).
[Show full text]
West and Central Africa Region COVID-19
West and Central Africa Region COVID-19 Situation Report No. 9 ©UNFPA United Nations Population Fund Reporting Period: 1 - 31 October 2020 Regional Highlights Situation in Numbers ● The West and Central Africa region is not experiencing a second wave of COVID-19 as seen 247,429 Confirmed COVID-19 Cases on other continents. The WCA region has recorded a steady decrease of cases over the last two weeks. 3,770 COVID-19 Deaths ● The total number of COVID-19 cases has reached over 247,429 in the 23 countries in West and Central Source: WHO, 4 November 2020 Africa. By the end of October 2020, there were 3,770 deaths, with a mortality rate of about 1.5%. Nearly 15,000 (9.6%) patients were still under treatment, Key Population Groups while 92.5% had recovered. ● The pandemic continues to spread at a much slower 13 M Pregnant Women rate. The five countries with the highest confirmed caseloads are: Nigeria (63,036), Ghana (48,124), Cameroon (22,103), Côte d'Ivoire (20,753) and 108 M Women of Reproductive Age Senegal (15,630). ● Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea record the highest percentage of recovery: 98.3% 98% and 148 M Young People (age 10-24) 97.6% respectively, while Chad and Liberia have the highest case fatality rates, 6.5% and 5.8%. 13 M Older Persons (age 65+) ● Health worker infections continue to increase gradually with 8,437 infections reported in 22 WCA countries since the beginning of the outbreak. Nigeria remains the most affected, with 2,175 health Funding Status for Region (US$) workers infected, followed by Ghana (2,065), Cameroon (808), Guinea (513), Equatorial Guinea (363), Senegal (349) and Guinea-Bissau (282).
[Show full text]
Djibouti Health Expenditure Profile
Djibouti Health expenditure profile HEALTH SPENDING IN BRIEF WHO PAYS FOR HEALTH? 0.6% Health spending (% of GDP) 3.5 27.8% Health expenditure per capita (US$) 70 Public Out-of-pocket 45.8% Public spending on health per capita (US$) 32 Voluntary prepayment External Other GDP per capita (US$) 2,004 25.8% Life expectancy, both sexes (years) 62 RICHER COUNTRIES SPEND MORE ON HEALTH… …BUT NOT NECESSARILY AS A SHARE OF GDP 10,000 25 20 1,000 15 10 100 Health spending % of GDP 5 Health spending per capita (US$, log scale) 10 0 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 GDP per capita (US$, log scale) GDP per capita (US$, log scale) MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING ON HEALTH IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOWER OUT-OF-POCKET SPENDING DOES GOVERNMENT SPEND ENOUGH ON HEALTH? 100 100 10 80 80 8 60 60 6 % US$ 40 40 4 20 20 2 Out-of-pocket spending % of health 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Public spending on health % of GDP Health spending per capita (US$, bars) Government health spending % of total government spending (line) Djibouti PRIORITY OF HEALTH IN BUDGET ALLOCATION IS A POLITICAL CHOICE 25 20 15 10 5 Government health spending % of total government spending 0 India Egypt Kenya Congo Nigeria Angola Kiribati Ghana Bhutan SudanBoliviaJordan Tunisia Djibouti Vanuatu Armenia Ukraine Zambia Morocco Georgia Eswatini Lao PDRPakistan Myanmar TajikistanMongolia IndonesiaSri LankaViet Nam Honduras Cameroon MauritaniaMicronesia Cambodia Philippines Uzbekistan GuatemalaNicaraguaEl Salvador Timor-LesteBangladesh Côte d'Ivoire Cabo Verde Solomon
[Show full text]
Trends Gross and Net Spending Non-Cash Benefits
8. PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ON PENSIONS Key Results Public spending on cash old-age pensions and survivors’ benefits in the OECD increased from an average of 6.6% of gross domestic product (GDP) to 8.0% between 2000 and 2015. Public pensions are often the largest single item of social expenditure, accounting for 18.4% of total government spending on average in 2015. Greece spent the largest proportion of national income Trends on public pensions among OECD countries in 2015: 16.9% of Public pension spending was fairly stable as a GDP. Other countries with high gross public pension proportion of GDP over the period 1990-2015 in spending are in continental Europe, with Italy at 16.2% and ten countries: Australia, Germany, Iceland, Israel, Lithuania, Austria, France and Portugal at between 13% and 14% of New Zealand, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden and Switzerland. GDP. Public pensions generally account for between one- fourth and one-third of total public expenditure in these Public pension expenditure increased by more than 4 countries. points of GDP between 2000 and 2015 in Finland, Greece, Portugal and Turkey, and between 2 and 3 percentage points Iceland and Mexico spent 2.1% and 2.2% of GDP on in France, Italy, Japan and Spain. public pensions, respectively. Korea is also a low spender at 2.9% of GDP. Mexico has a relative young population, which Gross and net spending is also the case but to a lesser extent in Iceland, where much of retirement income is provided by compulsory The penultimate column of the table shows public occupational schemes (see the next indicator of “Pension- spending in net terms: after taxes and contributions paid on benefit expenditures: Public and private”), leaving a lesser benefits.
[Show full text]
ANALYSIS and MAJOR FINDINGS Analysis and Major Findings
Preface PART3 ANALYSIS AND MAJOR FINDINGS Analysis and Major Findings 3.1 OVERVIEW (AFCEs), individual government consumption expenditures Purchasing power parities are used to contrast estimates of the size (IGCEs), collective government consumption expenditures of a country’s economy, its aggregate welfare, the well-being of its (CGCEs) and investment. Africa regional values include only the residents and how its prices compare with those in other countries. 48 African countries that participated in 2005 ICP-Africa. The main results are presented in tables and figures. The main indi- The results of 2005 ICP-Africa are presented below. The descrip- cators used are price level indices (PLIs) and per capita GDP, its tive analysis covers gross domestic product (GDP) and some of expenditure components and their expenditure shares in terms its main components: actual final consumption expenditures of the total Africa region. Figure 1: Real GDP By Country in Billion AFRIC, 2005 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 e r os de r r oon ogo Mali e r T occo Niger Chad unisia Benin r V Egypt Kenya Sudan Liberia Ghana T Congo Gabon Malawi Nigeria Angola Guinea Djibouti Zambia anzania Gambia Uganda Ethiopia Senegal Lesotho Namibia Rwanda T Mo Mauritius Como Botswana Swaziland Mauritania Zimbabwe Came Cape South Africa Madagascar Sierra Leone Côte d'Ivoi Mozambique Burkina Faso Guinea-Bissau ome and Principe Equatorial Guinea T Sao Central African Republic Congo, Democratic Republic Note: For more details, see Table T10 in part 6. Burundi is not shown because it did not supply national account data.
[Show full text]
EQUATORIAL GUINEA Malabo Vigatana
Punta Europa EQUATORIAL GUINEA Malabo Vigatana Basupú San Antonio Basapú Rebola Sampaca de Palé Basilé Baney I. Tortuga Balorei BIOKO NORTE Cupapa Ye Cuín Basuala ATLANTIC Isla de Batoicopo OCEAN Pico Basilé Annobón 3,011.4 m Basacato Bacake Pequeño Lago a Pot del Oeste ATLANTIC OCEAN Baó Grande ANNOBÓN Anganchi BIOKO SUR Moeri Bantabare Quioveo Batete 598 m National capital Luba Bombe Isla de Boiko (Fernando Po) Provincial capital Musola Bococo Aual City, town Riaba Major airport Caldera 2,261 m International boundary Malabo Misión Mábana Provincial boundary Eoco Main road Bohé Other road or track Ureca 0 1 2 km The seven provinces are grouped into 0 5 10 15 20 km two regions: Continental, chief town Bata; and Insular, chief town Malabo. 0 1 mi 0 5 10 mi Punta Santiago Río Ntem Punta Epote B ongola The boundaries and names shown and the CAMEROON Tica designations used on this map do not imply official Yengüe CAMEROON endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Bioko N etem Macora EQUATORIAL Andoc Ebebiyin Ayamiken Ngoa Micomeseng Acom Esong GUINEA Mbía Anguma Mimbamengui KIE NTEM GABON Ebongo Nsang Biadbe San Joaquín Nkue Tool Annobón lo de Ndyiacon San o Dumandui G B Utonde Carlos Oboronco u Mfaman Temelon a o Abi r Ngong Monte Bata o Mongo Bata Ngosoc ATLANTIC Nfonga Mindyiminue Niefang Añisok OCEAN Mfaman Niefang Nonkieng Ayaantang Movo Mondoc Efualn Elonesang Ndumensoc Amwang Ncumekie LITORAL Bisún Mbam Pijaca Nyong Masoc Ayabene Bingocom ito Manyanga en Mongomo B Añisoc Mbini Bon Ncomo Nkumekie Yen U Nsangnam o ro Mbini Mangala
[Show full text]
Mauritius Budget Highlights 2020-2021
Mauritius Budget Highlights 2020/21 June 4, 2020 KPMG.com/mu Contents 03 KPMG View 08 Budget Financials 10 Economic Outlook Global Business & 14 Regulatory 19 Corporate Tax 23 Personal Tax 26 Indirect Taxes 31 Tax Administration 34 Appendices © 2020 KPMG,KPMG Taxa Mauritian Services partnership Ltd, a Mauritian and a limited member liability firm of company the KPMG and network a member of independent firm of the KPMG member network firms ofaffiliated independent with KPMG memb Inteer firmsrnational affiliated Cooperative, with KPMG a Swiss International entity. All Cooperative, rights reserved.. a Swiss 2 entity. All rights reserved.. Document Classification: KPMG Confidential FOREWORD KPMG View An array of social measures for economic revival The Minister of Finance, Economic Planning and economy, building of a pharmaceutical industry and Development, presented on 4 June 2020 the 2020- promotion of regional partnerships. 2021 budget speech entitled “Our new normal: the The tourism industry received a number of incentives economy of life”. such as the possibility to convert hotels into service The Government has embarked into the post COVID- apartments which can be sold individually, a two year 19 era with measures presented under a “Plan de no-licence fee period for Tourism and Beach Authority Relance de L’Investissement et de L’Economie”, operators, a waiver of rental of State land for one year, “Major Structural Reforms” and “Securing and the increase in the rebate scheme for renovation Sustainable and Inclusive Development”. and restructuring to 100% until 2022. As the country navigates its way out of the COVID-19 Reducing concentration and promoting local pandemic with a projected contraction of 11% this manufacturing year, we also face an ageing population and a high Local manufacturers will benefit with supermarkets gross public sector debt ratio of 83.4% (net 72.7%).
[Show full text]
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Analysis of Economic Studies
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Analysis of Economic Studies James K. Jackson Specialist in International Trade and Finance June 30, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44551 The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Analysis of Economic Studies Summary Congress plays a major role in formulating and implementing U.S. trade policy through its legislative and oversight responsibilities. Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress has the authority to regulate foreign commerce, while the President has the authority to conduct foreign relations. In 2015, Congress reauthorized Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) that( 1) sets trade policy objectives for the President to negotiate in trade agreements; (2) requires the President to engage with and keep Congress informed of negotiations; and (3) provides for Congressional consideration of legislation to implement trade agreements on an expedited basis, based on certain criteria. The United States is considering the recently-concluded Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) among the United States and 11 other countries. The 12 TPP countries signed the agreement in February 2016, but the agreement must be ratified by each country before it can enter into force. In the United States this requires implementing legislation by Congress. The agreement is viewed by the participants as a “comprehensive and high standard” mega- regional free trade agreement that may hold the promise of greater economic opportunities and closer economic and strategic ties among the negotiating parties. For Members of Congress and others, international trade and trade agreements may offer the prospect of improved national economic welfare. Such agreements, however, have mixed effects on U.S. domestic and foreign interests, both economic and political.
[Show full text]
Equatorial Guinea Home to the Fourth Highest Species Richness of Primates in Africa Including Many Endemic Subspecies
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Equatorial Guinea Home to the fourth highest species richness of primates in Africa including many endemic subspecies. Unsustainable hunting is the single greatest threat to the majority of wildlife in Equatorial Guinea’s forests. Equatorial Guinea’s national development plan, Horizonte 2020, has led to rapid infrastructure development which also represents a severe threat to the country’s wildlife and their habitat. New road network exacerbate commercial bushmeat hunting and trade by increasing access to forests and urban bushmeat markets. Higher income among the urban elite and a lack of suitable alternative protein options and jobs in rural areas is leading to an increase in bushmeat demand. The lack of wildlife law enforcement exacerbates the bushmeat The frog species Afrixalus paradorsalis sits on a leaf in a forest in Equatorial Guinea. trade. Credit: Matt Muir/USFWS. Marine Turtle Mortality Equatorial Guinea while waters off the coast of the The intentional or incidental capture of (EG), the only mainland are particularly important as marine turtles and the raiding of nests Spanish-speaking feeding sites. The dense forests on for eggs constitute the greatest threats country in Africa, is Equatorial Guinea’s mainland contain to marine turtles in Equatorial Guinea. home to an the endangered forest elephant and Poachers often target nesting females. incredibly diverse central chimpanzee, and the critically In urban areas on Bioko Island and on range of species. In endangered western lowland gorilla. the mainland, turtle meat sells for as addition to a mainland, it stretches much as $10 per kilogram and a live across an archipelago of islands in the Given its small size, Equatorial adult turtle for more than $500.
[Show full text]
Budget Analysis for Investments in Children in Saint Lucia
Budget Analysis for Investments in Children in Saint Lucia BUDGET ANALYSIS FOR INVESTMENTS IN CHILDREN IN SAINT LUCIA Published by UNICEF Office for the Eastern Caribbean Area First Floor, UN House Marine Gardens, Hastings Christ Church Barbados Tel: (246) 467 6000 Fax: (246) 426 3812 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unicef.org/easterncaribbean This Study was commissioned by the UNICEF Office for the Eastern Caribbean Area and UN Women Multi-Country Office - Caribbean The contents do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of the organizations. Authors: Zina Nimeh, Arthur Van de Meerendonk, Franziska Gassmann, Jouke Wortelboer, Eli Stoykova and Daphne Francoise Nimeh, Z., Van de Meerendonk, A., Gassmann, F., Wortelboer, J. and Stoykova, E., Francoise, D. (2015). Budget Analysis for Investments in Children in Saint Lucia, UNICEF Office for the Eastern Caribbean Area. All rights reserved. 2015 Budget Analysis for Investments in Children in Saint Lucia CONTENTS Acknowledgments x Executive summary 2 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Structure of the report 13 1.2 Government actors 13 1.3 Data and methodology 13 1.4 Limitations 14 1.5 Process 14 2 Economic and Social Context 16 2.1 Economic and fiscal environment 16 2.2 Fiscal operations and management and the social budget 19 2.3 Demographic trends 21 2.4 Labour market 23 2.5 Poverty and child well-being 25 2.6 Conclusion 30 3 Education 32 3.1 Short overview of the education system in Saint. Lucia 32 3.2 Policies and planning 33 3.2.1 Laws and other basic regulations concerning education
[Show full text]
Fiscal and Structural Reforms in Saint Lucia: Towards a Comprehensive
FISCAL AND STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN SAINT LUCIA: TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE AGENDA NOVEMBER 2016 FISCAL AND STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN SAINT LUCIA: TOWARDS A MORE COMPREHENSIVE AGENDA vi Disclaimer Copyright © Caribbean Development Bank (CDB). The opinions, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the staff of CDB and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of CDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent. This work may be reproduced, with attribution to CDB, for any non-commercial purpose. The use of CDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of CDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written licence agreement between CDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this licence. No derivative work is allowed. CDB does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within this document and therefore does not warrant that the use of any third-party owned individual component or part contained in this work will not infringe on the rights of those third parties. Any risks of claims resulting from such infringement rest solely with the user. CDB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. Any dispute related to the use of the works of CDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. Nothing herein shall constitute or be deemed to constitute a waiver of the privileges and immunities of CDB, all of which are specifically reserved. FISCAL AND STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN SAINT LUCIA: TOWARDS A MORE COMPREHENSIVE AGENDA ii Acknowledgements The Caribbean Development Bank expresses appreciation to the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank for its contribution to the Report, as well as to the Staff of the Ministry of Finance, especially the Research and Policy Unit, who provided invaluable assistance on this project.
[Show full text]