DOCSLIB.ORG

Armory Commission Letters of Francis H. Smith. Full Text Transcriptions With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Armory Commission Letters of Francis H. Smith. Full Text Transcriptions With ©Virginia Military Institute Archives [email protected] www.vmi.edu/archives Arms for Virginia On the Eve of the Civil War The Armory Commission Letters of Col. Francis H. Smith Transcribed & Annotated by Col. Edwin L. Dooley, Jr. The majority of letters included in this work are the property of the Virginia Military Institute. This material may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching, and personal use as long the Virginia Military Institute Archives is cited. Letters included from other sources are identified in the text and given their proper attributions. See endnotes for details about the names and topics highlighted in bold type*. Many of the notes also contain links to additional material. Background: Following the raid in October 1859 on the Federal Arsenal at Harper‘s Ferry, Virginia, by the abolitionist John Brown,* officials in Virginia were convinced that the state‘s defense forces, the militia,* needed to be improved and better armed. In 1860, the Virginia General Assembly passed legislation to improve the militia and to arm it appropriately. By law, the U.S. Secretary of War was not authorized to sell U.S. arms to individual states, beyond the issue of their annual quota,* unless the U.S. arms had been condemned. Consequently, the options open to the state of Virginia for acquiring additional reliable weapons were either to retool and refurbish its supply of flint lock muskets, or to purchase arms from private gun makers in the north, or to purchase arms from abroad (prices were considered excessive), or to manufacture its own arms. To solve this problem, the Virginia General Assembly appropriated funds on 21 January 1860 for the purchase and manufacture of ―Arms and Munitions of War‖ and created a three-member commission* to oversee this project. Governor John Letcher,* newly inaugurated as Governor of Virginia, appointed the following three men to the commission: Col. Philip St. George Cocke,* Maj. George W. Randolph,* and Col. Francis H. Smith.* At the time, Col. Smith was Superintendent of the Virginia Military Institute where he had served since its founding in 1839. He was also responsible for the Lexington Arsenal* (a state arsenal) located at VMI. The commission, known as the Armory Commission or the Armory Board, began its work shortly after being appointed. In February-March, 1860, the three commissioners and Governor Letcher visited the Springfield Arsenal and Armory,* at Springfield, Massachusetts, the West Point Foundry,* at Cold Spring, New York, and the Harper’s Ferry Arsenal and Armory,* Harper‘s Ferry, Virginia, to examine weapons and machinery for the manufacture of small arms. Soon thereafter, Colonel Smith contacted James Tyler Ames,* of the Massachusetts Arms Company,* Chicopee Falls, Mass., to arrange the purchase by the state of Virginia of machinery to produce small arms. The plan was to transport the machinery to the Richmond Arsenal and Armory* where arms could be manufactured for militia companies in the state. In the end, negotiations with Ames were broken off and the commissioners purchased Enfield muskets* from private arms merchants England and entered into a contract on 23 August 1860 with Joseph R. Anderson* of the Tredegar Iron Works in Richmond to manufacture arms there. (See endnote under ―proposition made to Mr. Ames‖ for an account found in Colonel William Couper, One Hundred Years at V.M.I. (Richmond: Garrett and Massie, 1939), hereafter cited as Couper, One Hundred Years at V.M.I. 1 ©Virginia Military Institute Archives [email protected] www.vmi.edu/archives At the same time that the Armory Commission was negotiating the purchase of machinery to manufacture arms, efforts were being made to acquire examples of up-to-date rifles, pistols, and guns (cannons) to be tested at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington. The Armory commissioners believed that these tests would furnish them with ideas for improved and inexpensive weapons to be manufactured at the Richmond Arsenal and Armory. Responsibility for carrying out these tests was given to several VMI faculty members, including Major Raleigh E. Colston* and Major Thomas J. Jackson,* who was then serving on the VMI faculty as professor of natural and experimental philosophy (physics) and instructor in artillery. (See endnote under ―Weapons testing at VMI by Maj. Jackson and others.‖) When the war broke out, the Federal Arsenal and Armory at Harper‘s Ferry was destroyed and abandoned by the retreating Federal guard, but the shops, over 400 machines for the manufacture of muskets and rifles, thousands of tools, and many small arms components were saved and were confiscated by Virginia Militia. This salvaged matérial was sent to the arsenal at Fayetteville, N.C., and to the Richmond Arsenal and Armory. According to Herb Fisher, in ―The Virginia Manufactory of Arms,‖ Notes on Virginia (Richmond: Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks, Winter, 1988), p. 27, ―The Richmond Armory, together with the adjacent Tredegar Iron Works, and the Confederate Laboratory, located in the rear of the armory on Brown‘s Island, produced close to half of the armaments and ammunition used by the Confederate forces.‖ # # # # # The following letters document the efforts of Col. Smith and the Armory Commission to obtain arms-making machinery. They also document efforts to obtain examples of up-to-date small arms and cannon for testing at VMI, and they include occasional correspondence with militia company commanders who were urgently appealing to Col. Smith and the Commission for weapons to arm their units. The correspondence can be found in letterpress form in volumes of the Outgoing letters of Francis H. Smith, Superintendent of the Virginia Military Institute (located in Archives, Preston Library, VMI, Lexington, VA. No separate reports on weapons testing at VMI have been located at the Institute, nor is there any mention of weapons testing in the 1860 VMI Annual Report or in the Minutes of the Board of Visitors for 1860. 2 ©Virginia Military Institute Archives [email protected] www.vmi.edu/archives This is an example of the condition of the letters in Smith‘s letter book. On the left, the letterpress process has produced a fairly legible copy (enhanced here by computer software). On the right, the ink of the letterpress copy has been degraded by moisture damage that occurred many years ago. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Note: The following letter is the first extant from Smith following John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry on 16-18 October 1859. Smith’s letter reflects rising concern in Virginia over the state of its defenses and it points to the special role that Smith and VMI would play in the coming year.] Va Military Institute Nov 1st 1859 Gen’l Wm H. Richardson* Adj‘t Gen‘l [Adjutant General of Virginia] Sir, I have the honor to submit the enclosed report in obedience to orders rec‘d from the Adjutant General‘s office dated October 29th 1859. I beg leave to state that the muskets on deposit at this arsenal [the Lexington Arsenal* located at VMI] are for the most part flint locks and are not to be relied upon for service. I would therefore renew the recommendation which I have made on a former occasion viz that percussion locks* be substituted for the flint locks. The deficiency of fixed ammunition at this arsenal has induced me to submit the accompanying 3 ©Virginia Military Institute Archives [email protected] www.vmi.edu/archives recquisitions. To this I would add 200 of the most approved rifles & a few revolvers. Considering the emergency that may require the (immediate?) use of Artillery as well as Cavalry I would respectfully suggest that from 30 to 40 horses be provided for the Institution, that the Cadets may be instructed in Cavalry & Horse Artillery. With this provision for this important Military school those who are to be the future officers of our Militia will be thoroughly trained in these most important arms & besides at a moment‘s warning 200 Cadets well disciplined for service in either the Cavalry Artillery or Infantry will be in readiness to meet the call of the state whenever & wherever that shall be made. The horses will thus not only add to the efficiency of the school of a military institution but will afford facilities for a prompt transmission of (unclear) of duty & danger. /FHS/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Note: See Correspondence of the Fredericksburg News* from a correspondent who visited Lexington, 7 November 1859 in endnotes.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Va Mil: Institute Nov 22d 1859 His Excellency Henry A. Wise* Charleston Va Dear Sir, In obedience to the instructions conveyed to me by your telegraphic dispatch, I have kept a detachment of the corps of Cadets, 80 in number, with a battery of Howitzers ready for service at a moment‘s call, and beg leave to state that the command is provided with all the appliances for taking care of themselves upon the field of duty now claiming their services. The Commissary has his cooking implements in order, & we are thus in a state of preparation much more complete than that attends the ordinary militia command. In addition it gives me pleasure to state, that Messrs Harman & Co have placed their stages & entire stock at Lexington & Staunton at my command, & they will transport my detachment at a moment‘s call, free of charge. This tender is very creditable to these gentlemen, and I mention it specially to you, as showing the patriotic spirit that actuates them. These facilities will enable me to reach Winchester* in 20 hours after notice & you may therefore (rely?) upon dispatch in our movements as soon as ordered. I am at your service for duty in advance of the Corps, should it be required. /FHS/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Va Mil: Institute Nov 19th 1859 His Excellency H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “What Are Marines For?” the United States Marine Corps
    “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2011 Major Subject: History “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era Copyright 2011 Michael Edward Krivdo “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, R. J. Q. Adams James C. Bradford Peter J. Hugill David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. (May 2011) Michael E. Krivdo, B.A., Texas A&M University; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, III This dissertation provides analysis on several areas of study related to the history of the United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. One element scrutinizes the efforts of Commandant Archibald Henderson to transform the Corps into a more nimble and professional organization. Henderson's initiatives are placed within the framework of the several fundamental changes that the U.S. Navy was undergoing as it worked to experiment with, acquire, and incorporate new naval technologies into its own operational concept.
    [Show full text]
  • F.LLI PIETTA HISTORICAL WEAPONS REPRODUCTION Ed.01/2013
    PIETTA MAN AVAN-INGL 06-12-12 14-12-2012 9:48 Pagina 1 BLACK POWDER [email protected] ® MUZZLELOADING REVOLVERS AND CARBINES F.LLI PIETTA HISTORICAL WEAPONS REPRODUCTION ed.01/2013 Made in Italy by: Instruction and Safety Manual for Black Powder ® Muzzleloading Revolvers F.LLI PIETTA and Carbines F.A.P. Fabbrica Armi F.LLI PIETTA di Pietta Giuseppe & C. S.r.l. Via Mandolossa, 102 25064 GUSSAGO (Brescia) Italy Cod. fisc.- P. iva IT00274400175 Tel. 39 030 37 37 098 Fax 39 030 37 37 100 READ THE INSTRUCTIONS AND WARNINGS IN THIS MANUAL CAREFULLY AND www.pietta.it THOROUGHLY BEFORE HANDLING, LOADING OR SHOOTING THIS FIREARM !! e-mail: [email protected] PIETTA MAN AVAN-INGL 06-12-12 14-12-2012 9:48 Pagina 3 BBLACKLACK PPOWDEROWDER MMUZZLELOADINGUZZLELOADING RREVOLVERSEVOLVERS AND AND CCARBINESARBINES ENGLISH INDEX THIS MANUAL CONTAINS 4 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS & WARNINGS 6 SAFETY PROCEDURES 11 LOADING 16 HANDLING 26 DECOCKING (UNCOCKING) 27 CARE AND CLEANING 29 STORAGE 32 LEAD EXPOSURE 33 STATE WARNINGS 34 NOMENCLATURES 37 3 PIETTA MAN AVAN-INGL 06-12-12 14-12-2012 9:48 Pagina 5 THIS MANUAL CONTAINS: WARNING: DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY F.LLI PIETTA SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRODUCT MALFUNCTIONING OR FOR Important warnings which should be read and understood before PHYSICAL INJURY, DEATH OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY RESULTING FROM EITHER INTEN- using this firearm. TIONAL OR ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE OF THIS FIREARM, ITS CRIMINAL OR NEGLIGENT USE, IMPROPER OR CARELESS HANDLING, UNAUTHORIZED MODIFICATIONS OR ALTE- Directions and procedures for handling, loading, firing and RATION, USE OF DEFECTIVE OR IMPROPER CHARGES, OR FROM ITS USE FOR PURPO- unloading.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction #129 - Two-Day Sale, March 27Th & 28Th 03/27/2021 9:00 AM EST
    Auction - Auction #129 - Two-Day Sale, March 27th & 28th 03/27/2021 9:00 AM EST Lot Title/Description Lot Title/Description 1 Superb U.S. Remington Model 1863 Percussion Zouave Rifle 4 Fine New England Underhammer Percussion Sporting Rifle .58 caliber, 33" round barrel with a bright perfect bore. While most .30 caliber, 20'' octagon barrel with a very good bore and turned for Zouave rifles remain in fine condition, this example is exceptionally fine. starter at muzzle. This walnut stocked rifle is German silver mounted The barrel retains about 95% original blue finish with the slightest and engraved but oddly is not maker marked. Both David Squier and the amount of light flaking where the blue is starting to mix with a brown man from whom he purchased this rifle, Albert C. Mayer attribute it to patina. The lock and hammer retain 99% brilliant original color David Hilliard of Cornish, NH. It very much Hilliard's style and quality but case-hardened finish. The stock shows 98% of its original oil finish with at the end of the day it stands on its own merits regardless of its maker. nice raised grain feel throughout; both cartouches are very crisp. The The barrel shows areas of light scroll engraving at the breech, center brass patchbox, buttplate, barrel bands and forend tip all show a and muzzle as well as on the top tang of the buttplate. As mentioned it is pleasing mellow patina. The band retaining springs retain nearly all of German silver mounted with its round patchbox showing a very their original blue.
    [Show full text]
  • GUNS Magazine January 1959
    JANUARY 1959 SOc fIIEST III THE fllUUlS finD HUNTING- SHOOTING -ADVENTURE 1958 NATIONAL DOUBLES CHAMPION JOE HIESTAND • Ohio State Champion-9 times • Amateur Clay Target Champion of America-4 times • Doubles Champion of America­ 3 times • High Over All Champion-7 times • Hiestand has the remarka'ble record of having broken 200 out of 200 fifty times. • Hiestand has the world's record of having broken 1,404 registered targets straight without missing a one. Champions like Joe Hiestand de­ pend on the constant performance of CCI primers. The aim of CCI Champions like Joe Hiestand de­ pend on the constant performance of CCI primers. The aim of cel is to continue to produce the finest quality primers for Ameri­ can shooters. .' Rely on CCI PRIMERS American Made ~ Large and Small Rifle, 8.75 per M Large and Small Pistol, 8.75 per M Shotshell Caps, 8.75 per M Shotshell, 15.75 per M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ TWO IDEAL CHRISTMAS GIFTS ... ~ ·tgfJi'Yo, ~ , ~ ~ ; ,.;- '.. •22,iSPRINCiFIELD CONVERSION UNIT .fSmash;n,g Fits Any M 1903 Springfield " j poWer BARREL INSERT MAGAZINE PERFECT FOR TRAININ~ I YOUNGSTERS AT LOW COST 12 SPRINGFIELD BOLT Only $34.50 ppd. (Extra magazine-$1.75) ~~f:~~"~? .~O.~Et~e t';p.er. The ~ ••nd ee..4 --.--- ~ ,~ :.'t =.r ' ~~~in~~ ;n(l ~:::~ u: i ~~ i~: »)l~~~:~~~s .•-:: isst:lnd~usrr;-e:~ . Id eal for practice using" .22 l.r, ammo. Think of the ]noney you Save . W hy pu c away your .22 Target p i at ol l ines, ru g . ge~ mct a~ alloy Ir- blue- Sp ringfie ld spor rer wh en high pow er season is ove r, quick ly conve rt it in to a super accurate ~~i~~ c:: ~n~~p er5~:: :~1n ef~ ~pa:i;~d Ol~ 5~~~ l~O~:~ot:i "Man-sized" .22 re peater.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Lane Steve Schulze Camp Commander
    SONS OF UNION VETERANS OF THE CIVIL WAR Lt. Commander Edward Lea U.S.N. – Camp Number 2 Harriet Lane *************************************************************************************** Summer 2007 Volume 14 Number 2 ************************************************************************************** From the Commander’s Tent Here we go again. Its summer with all the bustle and activity associated with the season. School is out, everyone’s looking forward to their vacations and the pace of life in some ways is even more frantic than during the other seasons of the year. The Camp just completed one of its most important evolutions - Memorial Day. We had nine Brothers at the National Cemetery, with eight in period uniform. I think this is the best uniformed turnout we’ve ever had, at least in my memory. We are also in the process of forming a unit of the Sons of Veteran’s Reserve. We have ten prospective members from our Camp. Brother Dave LaBrot is the prospective commanding officer. All we are waiting for is for the James J. Byrne Camp #1 to send down their seven applications so the paperwork can be turned in. We should then soon have the unit up and running. I hope that even more Brothers will join as we get rolling. I have been watching with great interest the way the level of awareness of and the desire to learn about the Civil War in particular, and the 1860’s in general, has been growing throughout the nation during the last few years. In part this may be because we are coming up upon another milestone period (the 150th anniversary). But also I think more people are realizing the importance of the events of that era and the extent that we are still being affected by them today.
    [Show full text]
  • CSS Georgia 2007 New South Assoc Rpt.Pdf
    I J K L New South Assciates • 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue • Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 CSS Georgia: Archival Study CONTRACT NO. DACW21-99-D-0004 DELIVERY ORDER 0029 Report submitted to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889 Report submitted by: New South Associates 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 _____________________________________ Mary Beth Reed - Principal Investigator Authors: Mark Swanson, New South Associates – Historian and Robert Holcombe, National Civil War Naval Museum – Historian New South Associates Technical Report 1092 January 31, 2007 CSS GEORGIA iii ARCHIVAL STUDY Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part One: Historical Context 3 The Setting: Geography of the Savannah Area 3 Pre-War Economic Developments, 1810-1860 5 Changes in Warfare, 1810-1860 6 Initial Development of Confederate Navy, 1861 – March 1862 8 Confederate Navy Reorganization, 1862-1863 17 Josiah Tattnall and the Beginnings of the Savannah Squadron, Early 1861 20 War Comes to Savannah, November 1861 – April 1862 23 Impetus for Georgia: The Ladies Gunboat Association 28 Construction of Georgia, March – October 1862 32 The Placement of Georgia, Late 1862 34 The Savannah Station and Squadron, 1862-1864 36 Fall of Savannah, December 1864 39 Part Two: CSS Georgia - Research Themes 41 Planning and Construction 41 1. Individuals and Organizations Involved in Fund-Raising 41 2. Evidence for Conception of Construction Plans for the Vessel; Background and Skill of Those Involved and an Estimate of How Long They Worked on the Project 45 3. Evidence for the Location of the Construction Site, the Site Where the Engine and Machinery Were Installed, and a Description of These Facilities 48 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction Arms Only
    REPRODUCTION ARMS ONLY North-South Skirmish Association, Inc. Small Arms Committee 2020 Edition Updated: 01/01/2020 N-SSA PRODUCTION APPROVED REPRODUCTION ARMS, BARRELS, AND PROCESSES For HAND AND SHOULDER ARMS Topic Section Rifles 1 Rifle Muskets 2 Smoothbore Muskets 3 Rifled Muskets 4 Carbines 5 Breechloading Rifles/Carbine II 6 Revolvers 7 Approved Processes 8 Rimfire to Centerfire Conversions 8a Approved Barrel Processes 8b Miscellaneous Approved Barrels 9 IMPORTANT NOTICES. READ CAREFULLY! (1) All firearms, barrels, and processes listed in this document are approved by the Board of Directors for use in shooting activities of the North-South Skirmish Association, Inc. They have received “Production Approval”, which means that as manufactured they are pre-approved for skirmish use. An arm or barrel which has been altered or modified must be submitted to the Small Arms Committee for individual approval and must be issued a Small Arms Committee approval card before it can be used in a skirmish. It is the responsibility of the skirmisher to find out if planned or executed changes might void the existing approval of an arm or a barrel, and to submit altered production arms and/or barrels to the Small Arms Committee for consideration. If you are considering making any changes to an approved arm or barrel it is good practice to discuss it first with a member of the Small Arms Committee. 2. The Small Arms Committee must individually approve custom-made arms for which the maker does not have production approval, and a Small Arms Committee individual approval card must be carried for that arm as evidence of that approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Ammunition for Civil War Breechloading Carbines and Rifles
    Federal Ammunition for Civil War Breechloading Carbines and Rifles Dean S. Thomas According to the "Statement of ordnance and ordnance stores purchased by the Ordnance Department from January 1, 1861, to June 30, 1866," the United States Army procured more than 427,000 assorted breechloading carbines and rifles during this period.' Additional quantities were purchased from the manufacturers by various Northern states, volunteer regiments, and individual soldiers. In all, more than twenty different brands found their way onto regimental ordnance returns, and each, with rare exception, required their own peculiar form of ammunition. Captain James G. Benton of the Ordnance Department described these weapons in his book, Ordnance and Gunney: The term "breech-loading" applies to those arms in which the charge is inserted into the bore through an opening in the pered by gas leakage at the breech joint-or lack of obtura- breech; and, as far as loading is concerned, the ramrod is tion. This fault was mechanically inherent in many early dispensed with. breechloaders, but was not successfully overcome until there The interior of the barrel of a breech-loading arm is were advances in cartridge-making technology. Although the divided into two distinct parts, viz., the bore proper, or space Hall breechloading flintlock rifle was adopted by the United through which the projectile moves under the influence of the States in 1819 (and a carbine in the 1830s), they did not have powder; and the chamber in which the charge is deposited. the merits of later weapons with metallic cartridge cases. The diameter of the chamber is usually made a little larger, and Most of the early advances in breechloading ammuni- that of the bore a little smaller, than that of the projectile; this tion were made in France.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Century Carbine Manual.Indd
    National Park Service Manual of Instruction for the Safe Use of Reproduction Breech-Loading Carbine and Rifl e in Interpretive Demonstrations TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Part I: Introduction 1 Part II: Nomenclature 5 Part III: Inspection and Maintenance 7 Part IV: Drill 10 Part V: Misfi re Procedures 27 Part VI: Laboratory 29 Part VII: Demonstration Critique 31 4 PART I - INTRODUCTION This manual sets forth the procedures that must be followed by persons demonstrating single-shot breechloading carbines and rifl es to the public in areas administered by the National Park Service (NPS). It also provides instruction on proper maintenance, inspection, and repair procedures. This manual must be used in conjunction with the service wide standards for Historic Weapons Firing Demonstrations (NPS-6 Guidelines for Interpretation). The information below largely comes from primary sources of the period during which the weapons described were used. Several generations of NPS historic weapons personnel have modifi ed these original texts in order to improve demonstrator and visitor safety, make the original texts more comprehensible and to incorporate knowledge gained from years of actually using these weapons in the fi eld. The Park’s Certifi ed Historic Weapons Program Supervisor is responsible for the training and safety of the demonstrators, as well as the safety of the visitors. The following criteria will help determine when a demonstrator has been adequately trained. 1 THE SHARPS CARBINE This manual mainly deals with the use and care of reproduction Model 1859 and Model 1863 Sharps carbines, which were the predominant carbine used during the American Civil War and are by far the most popular reprodction cavalry arm used today.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Wooden Gunboat Construction
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarShip Confederate Wooden Gunboat Construction: Logistical Nightmare By Adam C. Edmonds May, 2011 Director of Thesis: Lawrence E. Babits, Ph.D. History Department The Confederate States Navy built wooden gunboats throughout the American Civil War. Within Civil War literature, more research and detailed analysis of Confederate States Navy construction focuses on building of ironclad vessels. Wooden gunboat construction is largely ignored. This thesis examines wooden gunboat construction in two different areas of the Confederacy: northeastern North Carolina in Washington and Elizabeth City, and the Mars Bluff Navy Yard in South Carolina. Before presenting two Confederate wooden gunboat construction case studies, a look at Confederate industrial, manufacturing, and transportation infrastructure, from the national perspective, brings into focus the logistical limitations station commanders faced in northeastern North Carolina and at Mars Bluff more clearly. Scattered, yet interdependent, marine manufacturing and ordnance facilities, connected by a suspect transportation network, created a logistical nightmare. Historical investigation into wooden gunboat construction in Washington, Elizabeth City, and Mars Bluff, examines an overlooked Confederate States Navy building program. CONFEDERATE WOODEN GUNBOAT CONSTRUCTION: LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in History By Adam C. Edmonds May 2011 © Adam Edmonds, 2011 CONFEDERATE WOODEN GUNBOAT CONSTRUCTION: LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE By Adam C. Edmonds APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS _________________________________________________ Lawrence E. Babits, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER _________________________________________________ Wade G. Dudley, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dahlgren the Plymouth Rifle
    JOHN DAHLGREN And THE PLYMOUTH RIFLE Marc Gorelick, VGCA The author thanks Tim Prince of College Hill Arsenal (www.collegehillarsenal.com) and Cliff Sophia of CS Arms (www.csarms.com) for the use of their photographs. Few Americans today know who John Dahlgren was, or the role he played in the Civil War. Most Civil War and navy history buffs who recognize his name identify him as a Union Admiral and ordnance expert who developed a number of naval cannon. Indeed, for his achievements in developing naval cannon he became known as the “father of American naval ordnance.” But to the gun collecting community Dahlgren was also a small arms expert and the inventor of the unique Plymouth Rifle. Photo courtesy Tim Prince, College Hill Arsenal, www.collegehillarsenal.com DAHLGREN’S NAVY CAREER John Adolphus Bernard Dahlgren was born on November 13, 1809 in Philadelphia, the son of Bernhard Ulrik Dahlgren, the Swedish Consul in Philadelphia. Like another Swedish-American, John Ericsson, the inventor of the screw propeller, turret and ironclad monitor, Dahlgren was to have a profound effect on the U.S. Navy. Dahlgren joined the United States Navy in 1826 as a midshipman. He served in the U.S. Coastal Survey from 1834 to 1837 where he developed his talents for mathematics and scientific theory. He was promoted to lieutenant, and after a number of cruises was assigned as an ordnance officer at the Washington Navy Yard in 1847. Dahlgren was in his element as an ordnance officer. He excelled as a brilliant engineer and was soon given more and more responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 13: the CONFEDERATE UPPER BATTERY SITE, GRAND GULF
    Archaeological Report No. 13 THE CONFEDERATE UPPER BATTERY SITE, GRAND GULF, MISSISSIPPI EXCAVATIONS, 1982 William C. Wright Mississippi Department of Archives and History and Grand Gulf Military Park Monu&ent 1984 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 13 Patricia Kay Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 84-62001 ISBN: 0-938896-38-5 Copyright 1984 Mississippi Department of Archives and History TABLE OF CONTENTS Personnel ii Acknowledgements iii Introduction iv Goals v The Military Struggle 1 Historical Background 1 Notes •.••..•••••...•• 33 The Upper Battery Site 41 Notes .••••••.••.•. 43 Procedures and Methods •••••. 45 Conclusion •.•••..•.••.• 49 Artifact Inventory 56 References 64 i DIRECTOR William C. Wright Historical Archaeologist Mississippi Department of Archives and History CREW Marc C. Hammack B.A. University of Mississippi Lee M. Hilliard Mississippi State University James C. Martin B.A. Mississippi College Baylor University School of Law James R. "Binky" Purvis M.S. Delta State University VOLUNTEERS Phillip Cox, Park Manager Grand Gulf State Military Monument Robert Keyes Tom Maute Tommy Presson Vicksburg Artifact Preservation Society ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS At the end of every excavation the archaeologist finds he or she is indebted to a multitude of people for their assistance. support. and labors. This archaeologist is no different. but it is nearly impossible to include everyone. and for this I apologize should I omit an individual who rightfully deserves recognition. However, I would certainly be remiss if I did not take this opportunity to thank my crew: Marc Hammack. Lee Hilliard. rim Martin. and Binky Purvis. whose dedication and labors are forever appreciated.
    [Show full text]