Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Proposal for a New EU Legal Framework

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Proposal for a New EU Legal Framework Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Proposal for a new EU legal framework INTRODUCTION Save the Children was established in 1919 and is at the forefront in the fight for the rights of the child. Save the Children is an international movement for children’s rights that currently comprises 27 organisations, spanning five continents and operating in over 120 countries. Save the Children has been active for many years in raising awareness about the issue of child abuse and has implemented programmes to combat child abuse in all its forms. Within this programme framework, Save the Children gives direct help to children who have suffered sexual abuse by providing support through appropriate therapeutic projects. The sexual abuse of children represents a serious violation of children’s rights. The advance of new technologies poses even greater concerns as perpetrators can easily exploit the technology for the acquirement, production and distribution of child abuse images. Since the mid 1990s six members of the Save the Children Europe group have been engaged in combating the digital distribution of images depicting the sexual abuse of children and in raising awareness about child sexual abuse and exploitation via the internet and other new technologies. These organisations have worked together to implement hotlines, awareness raising campaigns and advocacy activities calling for increased and improved efforts at national and international levels to fight sexual abuse of children and the production and distribution of child abuse material. One of the major difficulties in combating child sexual abuse and the commercial sexual exploitation of children via the internet is the international, multi-jurisdictional nature of the crime and its cross border activity. The Member States of the European Union (EU) have taken steps to tackle this problem, especially through the EU Framework Decision on child sexual abuse and exploitation (“EU Child Sexual Abuse Framework Decision”) by defining, for example, what constitutes child pornography, and by attempting to harmonize legislation on the imposition of sentences within national penal codes. 1 The European Union has also agreed that the protection of children includes all citizens up to the age of eighteen. 2 1 Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA of 22 December 2003 on combating the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography (2003) OJ L13/44; Council Decision of 29 May 2000 to combat child pornography on the Internet OJ L 138/1. 2 This is in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child definition of a child, which defines a “child” as being “every human being below the age of eighteen”. - 1 - BRU 12676-1.099749.0251 Save the Children welcomes the advances made by the EU in this area. However efforts have to be redoubled to ensure that effective measures are taken to tackle these crimes against children. Furthermore, Save the Children considers that the focus of attention should start with the protection and rehabilitation of children who are at risk or who have been subjected to sexual abuse. However, the approach to date has been a criminal justice one with the focus being on the offender more so than on the victim. 3 Save the Children recalls that the Member States resolve in the EU Treaty to “ensuring the safety and security of their peoples by establishing an area of freedom, security and justice”. The time has come to place the protection of citizens, and in particular children, at the heart of the European Union’s strategy. Steps to move forward in this direction have been made by the new Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (“CoE Convention”), which is similar in many respects to the EU Child Sexual Abuse Framework Decision but takes a much broader and holistic approach. It covers areas not dealt with by the EU Child Sexual Abuse Framework Decision and openly prioritises child protection. Save the Children considers that there is an important difference in the CoE Convention as the CoE Convention provides measures to prevent the abuse or sexual exploitation of children, and to identify and protect victims, whereas the EU Child Sexual Abuse framework Decision is silent on these subjects focussing instead on punishment of the offender. Save the Children believes that EU legislation must improved to develop a more effective up-to-date legal framework in terms of child protection. Victim identification should be key to any new proposals for the Framework Decision. Save the Children believes that the EU Framework Decision forms a valid basis and considers the new CoE Convention to be a useful model but one which can also be improved upon. This report outlines existing EU legislation on combating the sexual exploitation and abuse of children, identifies gaps and makes recommendations towards the improvement of the current legislation in this area. 4 Save the Children provides solutions to these gaps in the current legislation drawing from not only the CoE Convention but also from the approaches in other EU instruments to tackle cross border crime and protect citizens. 3 However, recitals 5, 6,10, 11 and 12 of the Framework Decision state that the legislation addresses specific needs of victims. 4 Visible Evidence Forgotten Children Launch Report (2007); Visible Evidence Forgotten Children (2006); and Save the Children Position Paper regarding on-line images of sexual abuse and other Internet-related sexual exploitation of Children (August 2005 Update). - 2 - BRU 12676-1.099749.0251 Section 1: Legal Basis for Legislation The Council Framework Decision on combating the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography (EU Child Sexual Abuse Framework Decision) is enacted having regard to Article 29 5, Article 31(1)(e) 6 and Article 34(2)(b) 7 of the EU Treaty. Article 29 EU sets out the objective of the European Union as being “to provide citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice”. The primary goal of the EU Treaty, therefore, is to protect citizens with the protection of children being specifically identified as one of the Union’s objectives. This, according to Article 29 EU, is to be achieved by “preventing and combating crime” through closer cooperation between police forces and other competent authorities and through the European Police Office (Europol) and/or Eurojust. It may also involve approximation of rules on criminal matters. Therefore Article 29 EU enables the European Union to take measures to protect children which enhance co-operation between the appropriate authorities and to adopt legislation relating to criminal matters relating to the abuse of children. Article 31(1)(e) EU enables the EU to adopt minimum rules relating to the constituent elements of criminal acts and to penalties on particular crimes. 5 Article 29 EU states: “Without prejudice to the powers of the European Community, the Union's objective shall be to provide citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice by developing common action among the Member States in the fields of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and by preventing and combating racism and xenophobia. That objective shall be achieved by preventing and combating crime, organised or otherwise, in particular terrorism, trafficking in persons and offences against children , illicit drug trafficking and illicit arms trafficking, corruption and fraud, through: - closer cooperation between police forces, customs authorities and other competent authorities in the Member States, both directly and through the European Police Office (Europol), in accordance with the provisions of Articles 30 and 32; - closer cooperation between judicial and other competent authorities of the Member States in accordance with the provisions of Articles 31(a) to (d) and 32; - approximation, where necessary, of rules on criminal matters in the Member States, in accordance with the provisions of Article 31(e).” (own emphasis) 6 Article 31(1)(e) EU states: “Common action on judicial cooperation in criminal matters shall include: [...] progressively adopting measures establishing minimum rules relating to the constituent elements of criminal acts and to penalties in the fields of organised crime, terrorism and illicit drug trafficking.” 7 Article 34(2) EU: “The Council shall take measures and promote cooperation, using the appropriate form and procedures as set out in this Title, contributing to the pursuit of the objectives of the Union. To that end, acting unanimously on the initiative of any Member State or of the Commission, the Council may: […] adopt framework decisions for the purpose of approximation of the laws and regulations of the Member States. Framework decisions shall be binding upon the Member States as to the result to be achieved but shall leave to the national authorities the choice of form and methods. They shall not entail direct effect.” - 3 - BRU 12676-1.099749.0251 Article 34(2)(e) EU enables the EU to adopt framework decisions to implement these policies. These provisions are at the heart of the legislation to protect children against sexual exploitation. The recommendations made by Save the Children accord with these legal provisions. Save the Children also considers that other provisions of the EU Treaty may also be relevant for the legal basis of the instrument in order to make it more effective. In particular, Save the Children considers that Article 31 EU generally could also be applied rather than relying on specific provisions of the article. Article 31 EU formed the legal basis of legislation permitting the exchange of information extracted from criminal records and is the legal basis for the European Evidence Warrant. Likewise, this provision could facilitate the exchange of information regarding the potential criminal cases relating to child sexual abuse cases and child sexual abuse images (child pornography).
Recommended publications
  • Child Molesters: a Behavioral Analysis
    Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis For Law-Enforcement Officers Investigating the Sexual Exploitation of Children by Acquaintance Molesters In cooperation with the CHILD MOLESTERS: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS - Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis For Law-Enforcement Officers Investigating the Sexual Exploitation of Children by Acquaintance Molesters Fourth Edition September 2001 Kenneth V. Lanning Former Supervisory Special Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Copyright © 2001 National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. All rights reserved. The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), a national clearinghouse and resource center, is funded under Cooperative Agreement #98-MC-CX-K002 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions in this book are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Treasury, nor National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children is a registered service mark of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. CHILD MOLESTERS: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS - Dedication This publication is dedicated to child victims of sexual exploitation and the organization that allowed me to devote most of my 30-year career as a Special Agent to fighting crimes against children. To the Federal Bureau of Investigation I also dedicate this publication to my wife and children, without whose support for all these years I could not have maintained my objectivity and balance. To Kathy, Melissa, and Rick ii - CHILD MOLESTERS: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS Kenneth V. Lanning, M.S., FBI (Retired) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report: Towards a Global Indicator on Unidentified Victims in Child Sexual Exploitation Material
    00110010011101010001110010101010101000101001010100001010101010101010101000101101010101010110001011001010 11001101101000110011000101010101001001010110010101000101010100101010101010101010001010001100100111010101 01010101000101010100100101010101010101001010010101000010101111100010101011100010101010010101010101010000 10100101001000010010101010101000010101001010100101001010101110010111000111001110111001110011100011100011 10001001010100101001010111001100100111010100011100101010101010001010010101000010101010101010101010001011 01010101010110001011001010110011011010001100110001010101010010010101100101010001010101001010101010101010 10001010001100100111010101010101010001010101001001010101010101010010100101010000101011111000101010111000 10101010010101010101010000101001010010000100101010101010000101010010101001010010101011100101110001110011 10111001110011100011100011100010010101001010010101110011001001110101000111001010101010100010100101010000 10101010101010101010001011010101010101100010110010101100110110100011001100010101010100100101011001010100 01010101001010101010101010100010100011001001110101010101010100010101010010010101010101010100101001010100 00101011111000101010111000101010100101010101010100001010010100100001001010101010100001010100101010010100 10101011100101110001110011101110011100111000111000111000100101010010100101011100110010011101010001110010 10101010100010100101010000101010101010101010100010110101010101011000101100101011001101101000110011000101 01010100100101011001010100010101010010101010101010101000101000110010011101010101010101000101010100100101
    [Show full text]
  • Theire Journal
    CONTENTS 20 A MUCKRAKING LIFE THE IRE JOURNAL Early investigative journalist provides relevant lessons TABLE OF CONTENTS By Steve Weinberg MAY/JUNE 2003 The IRE Journal 4 IRE gaining momentum 22 – 31 FOLLOWING THE FAITHFUL in drive for “Breakthroughs” By Brant Houston PRIEST SCANDAL The IRE Journal Globe court battle unseals church records, 5 NEWS BRIEFS AND MEMBER NEWS reveals longtime abuse By Sacha Pfeiffer 8 WINNERS NAMED The Boston Globe IN 2002 IRE AWARDS By The IRE Journal FAITH HEALER Hidden cameras help, 12 2003 CONFERENCE LINEUP hidden records frustrate FEATURES HOTTEST TOPICS probe into televangelist By MaryJo Sylwester By Meade Jorgensen USA Today Dateline NBC 15 BUDGET PROPOSAL CITY PORTRAITS Despite economy, IRE stays stable, Role of religion increases training and membership starkly different By Brant Houston in town profiles The IRE Journal By Jill Lawrence USA Today COUNTING THE FAITHFUL 17 THE BLACK BELT WITH CHURCH ROLL DATA Alabama’s Third World IMAM UPROAR brought to public attention By Ron Nixon Imam’s history The IRE Journal By John Archibald, Carla Crowder hurts credibility and Jeff Hansen on local scene The Birmingham News By Tom Merriman WJW-Cleveland 18 INTERVIEWS WITH THE INTERVIEWERS Confrontational interviews By Lori Luechtefeld 34 TORTURE The IRE Journal Iraqi athletes report regime’s cruelties By Tom Farrey ESPN.com ABOUT THE COVER 35 FOI REPORT Bishop Wilton D. Gregory, Paper intervenes in case to argue for public database president of the U. S. Conference By Ziva Branstetter of Catholic Bishops, listens to a Tulsa World question after the opening session of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Category X Inmate Supervision and Control
    TOPIC M: JUVENILE SEXUAL OFFENDERS AND THEIR VICTIMS (For additional assistance, refer to the Commission-approved Specialized Course “Crimes Against Children,” the advanced course, “Sex Crimes,” and the Florida Juvenile Handbook, a joint effort between the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, the Department of Juvenile Justice and the Department of Children and Families.) OBJECTIVES: The student will: 1. Define “alleged juvenile sexual offender” as (a) A child 12 years of age or younger who is alleged to have committed a violation of 794, 796, 800, 827.071, or 847.0133; or (b) A child (includes children 18 and under) who is alleged to have committed any violation of law or delinquent act involving juvenile sexual abuse. 2. State that child on child sex offenses involve more than experimentation. Juvenile sexual offender behavior ranges from non-contact sexual behavior such as making obscene phone calls, exhibitionism, voyeurism, and the showing or taking of lewd photographs to varying degrees of direct sexual contact, such as frottage, fondling, digital and/or penetration with any other object, rape, fellatio, sodomy, and various other sexually aggressive acts. 3. Define “juvenile sexual abuse” as any sexual behavior that occurs without consent, without equality, or as a result of coercion or manipulative seduction. 4. Define “consent” as intelligent, knowing, and voluntary, and does not include coerced submission. Consent shall not be deemed or construed to mean the failure by the alleged victim to offer physical resistance to the offender. 5. Define “equality” as two participants operating with the same level of power in a relationship, neither being controlled nor coerced by the other.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 YEARS of FIGHTING the SALE and SEXUAL EXPLOITATION of CHILDREN: ADDRESSING NEW CHALLENGES Acknowledgements
    United Nations Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography 25 YEARS OF FIGHTING THE SALE AND SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN: ADDRESSING NEW CHALLENGES Acknowledgements The Special Rapporteur, Ms Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, wishes to thank Plan International, DCI-ECPAT Netherlands, and Terre des Hommes International who made this project possible. In addition, the Special Rapporteur is appreciative of the financial contributions from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Furthermore, she is grateful to the consultant who developed this publication, Mr Dorian Hall, under the guidance of Ms Nekane Lavín of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Lastly, Ms de Boer-Buquicchio wishes to pay tribute to the second Special Rapporteur Ms Ofelia Calcetas-Santos who passed away in 2011. Her contribution to the mandate is immeasurable and she helped shape the agenda on the fight against the sale and sexual exploitation of children at crucial moments, namely during the first World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in Stockholm in 1996 and the negotiations leading to the adoption of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography in 2000. Handbook by the Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography c/o Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations at Geneva 814 Avenue de la Paix 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Children/Pages/ChildrenIndex.aspx Design and layout by Anya Gass, Plan International United Nations Office in Geneva With the support of: Plan International Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands Dukes Court, Block A, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Sex Rings: a Behavioral Analysis for Criminal Justice Professionals Handling Cases of Child Sexual ~ Exploitation
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISt.f9IN(. 1~"I"j('lrl'l~I) -----1.---' CHI L D R E N Child Sex Rings: A Behavioral Analysis For Criminal Justice Professionals Handling Cases of Child Sexual ~ Exploitation In cooperation with the Federal Bureau of Investigation ------------------ 149214 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been grantedNaElona1 by • center f'or Mlsslng . & Exploited Chi1dren/DOJ/FBI to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner. Child Sex Rings: A Behavioral Analysis For Criminal Justice Professionals Handling Cases of Child Sexual Exploitation April 1992 Second Edition Kenneth V. Lanning Supervisory Special Agent Behavioral Science Unit Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Academy Quantico, Virginia © National Center for Missing & Exploited Children Dedication This book is dedicated to the victims of child sex rings and to the memory of two FBI agents who devoted their professional lives to helping sexually exploited children. Leo E. Brunnick FBI Boston, Massachusetts Alan V. MacDonald FBI Boston, Massachusetts Contents Author's Preface v 1. Historical Overview 1 "Stranger Danger" 1 Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse 2 Return to "Stranger Danger" 2 The Acquaintance Molester 3 Satanism: A "New" Form of "Stranger Danger" 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Perpetrators of Child Sexual Abuse : Social Constructionist and Traditional
    PERPETRATORS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE: SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST AND TRADITIONAL EMPIRICAL APPROACHES 5 ' , CHANELLE VI LIA LYELL Thesis presented in fulfilment of the 'requirements „ of the degree - D. LITT:. ET PHIL. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE FACULTY OF ARTS at the RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY PROMOTER: PROF. MARIETJIE JOUBERT AUGUST 1998 Prefect (moved): But we have every desire to respect that compassion, Mrs Ponza. We should like you to tell us, however ... Mrs. Ponza (speaking slowly and distinctly): What? The truth? It is simply this ...that I am...yes, I am Mrs Frola's daughter ... All (with a sigh of satisfaction): AN Mrs Ponza (still speaking slowly and distinctly, carrying straight on): ...And Mr Ponza's second wife ... All (astounded and disappointed, in subdued tones): Oh? But how on...? Mrs Ponza (slowly and distinctly carrying on): Yes! And for myself, I am nobody! Nobody at all! Prefect: Oh, no, Mrs. Ponza, that just cannot be! You must be either one or the other! Mrs. Ponza: No! As far as I am concerned, I am just whoever you think I am. (She looks intently at them all, for a moment through her veil, and then goes out. There is silence) Laudisi: And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the voice of truth! (He throws a derisive, challenging glance round the company.) Are you happy now? (He bursts out laughing) Hal Hal Hal Hal Pirandello (1962, p.87) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am/ si,ncerely grateful/ to- the follow i44.0,people. who- helped/ mew make thi/s, study pos ,sthie: My Promoter, Prof Marie Ii Joubert, for her superior guidance, advize ct,nd.
    [Show full text]
  • AVAILABLE from EDRS PRICE DESCRIPTORS DOCUMENT RESUME CG 018 999 Child Victims of Exploitation. Hearing Before the Select Commit
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 268 440 CG 018 999 TITLE Child Victims of Exploitation. Hearing before the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families. House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session (October 31, 1985). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families. PUB DATE 86 NOTE 170p.; Portions contain small print. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Adolescents; *Child Abuse; *Children; *Crime Prevention; Hearings; *Pornography; *Sexual Abuse; Victims of Crime IDENTIFIERS Congress 99th ABSTRACT This document contains witness testimonies and prepared statements from the Congressional hearing called to examine the plight of child victims of exploitation. The opening statement by Congresswoman Boggs outlines federal legislation and Congressional action regarding the exploitation of children. Representative McCain discusses legislation he has introduced which deals with child pornography. Kenneth V. Lanning, a special agent from the Behavioral Science Unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Training Division, provides information concerning the law enforcement perspective of the problem of child victims of exploitation. Victoria Wagner, the executive director of the Seattle Youth and Community Services describes some of the youth whouse her organization's services, how they get on the street, and what happens to them. Michael Jupp, executive director of Defense for Children International-U.S.A., discusses the commercial sexual exploitation of children. Thomas Berg, the director of clinical services with the Chesapeake Institute speaks to the perspective of the clinicalor therapeutic side of the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Investigation of Child Physical Abuse and Neglect Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation
    --r-c· If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. , " . ~)r".. >3" ' i, ' \. ~ ; r'" > GUIDELINES FOR THE o ~1 INVESTIGATION OF <A c ")I...~ CHILD PHYSICAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT, CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND EXPLOITATION , " .~ "\\ THE COMMISSIONc.. , (. ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING,,' f? STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'b ,'. D dI " • GUIDELINES FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF CHILD PHYSICAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND EXPLOITATION 125335 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating It. Points of view or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted malerial in mi­ crofiche only has been granted by California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to the Nalional Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. • Prepared by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training 1986 • • COMMISSIONERS B. Gale Wilson City Manager, Fairfield Chairman Robert Wasserman Chief of Police Vice-Chairman Fremont Police Department '. Sherman Block Sheri ff, Los Angeles County Glenn E. Dyer Sheriff, Alameda County Ca rm J. Grande Police Officer San Jose Police Department Cecil Hi cks District Attorney Orange County Edward Maghakian Retired Raquel Montenegro Professor of Education C.S.U.L.A. C. Alex Pantaleoni Assistant Dean, Dept. of Public Services, Rio Hondo College Charles B. Ussery Chief of Police • Long Beach Police Department Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the COURT of APPEALS of IOWA No. 17-0597 Filed March 21
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-0597 Filed March 21, 2018 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. LOREN LONG, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Paul L. Macek, Judge. A defendant appeals his convictions of ten counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, challenging the jury instructions and the admission of photographic evidence. AFFIRMED. Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Maria Ruhtenberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Darrel L. Mullins, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., Bower, J., and Scott, S.J.* *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2018). 2 SCOTT, Senior Judge. Following a jury trial, Loren Long was convicted of ten counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, in violation of Iowa Code section 728.12(3) (2015), for possessing child pornography. On appeal he asserts his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the marshalling jury instruction he asserts violates the unanimity rule. He also claims the court abused its discretion in admitting an excessive amount of photographs of child pornography and child erotica. In addition, Long filed a pro se brief appearing to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence he possessed the child pornography. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm his convictions. I. Background Facts and Proceedings. In the fall of 2014, Long became a resident at Freedom Home Ministries, a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping those who are homeless and suffering from addiction start over with life.
    [Show full text]
  • Interviews; Law Enforcement; Sexual Abuse; Victims of Crime
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 307 534 CG 021 697 AUTHOR Spaulding, William TITLE Interviewing Child Victims of Sexual Exploitation. INSTITUTION National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquent Prevention (Dept. of Justice), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Feb 87 CONTRACT 86-MC-CX-K003 NOTE 52p. PUB TYPE Guides - General (050) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Child Abuse; *Criminals; Interviews; Law Enforcement; Sexual Abuse; Victims of Crime ABSTRACT The interviewing of the child victim of sexual exploitation is one of the first and most importantsteps in solving and prosecuting a case of child exploitation andis the topic of this document. The first chapter discusses the interviewer'srole, focusing on improving communication, dealing withemotion, the interviewer's response, male or female investigator,and team interviewing. The developmental stage of the child,dynamics of sexual exploitation, and juveniles as witnesses arediscussed in the second chapter. Preparation for the interview isdiscussed in the third chapter, discussing the child's family, themedical examination. others present during the interview, decisionto record, and selecting the interview site. The interviewitself is the topic of the fourth chapter which discusses beginningthe interview, use of ana;:omically correct dolls, questioning the child victim,and closing the interview. Essays on special considerationsin investigating ritualistic child sexual abuse and in obtaining and usingexpertise search warrants in cases of preferential childmolesters are provided. A bibliography is included. The appendixincludes charts categorizing the sexual victimization of children andsituational and preferential child molesters, as well as a model ofthe cycle of violence. A model proviso is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Law Review, Volume 223, Issue 3, 2015
    Volume 223 Issue 3 2015 U.S. DEP’T OF ARMY PAMPHLET 27-100-223-3 PAMPHLET ARMY OF DEP’T MILITARY LAW REVIEW ARTICLES OUT OF FOCUS: EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IN THE MILITARY Major Kenneth W. Borgnino MILITARY LAW REVIEW LAW MILITARY THE SEARCH FOR STATUS: CHARTING THE CONTOURS OF COMBATANT STATUS IN THE AGE OF ISIS Lieutentant Colonel R. Aubrey Davis III HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN SYRIA: IS CRISIS RESPONSE AND LIMITED CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS THE SOLUTION? Major William D. Hood THE CODE INDICTED: WHY THE TIME IS RIGHT TO IMPLEMENT A GRAND JURY PROCEEDING IN THE MILITARY Major John G. Doyle JUS IN BELLO FUTURA IGNOTUS: THE UNITED STATES, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AND THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT Lieutenant Colonel James T. Hill BECOMING A HARDER TARGET: UPDATING MILITARY FIREARMS POLICIES TO COMBAT ACTIVE SHOOTERS Major Anthony M. Osborne VOLUME 223 • 2015 Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-100-223-3 Military Law Review Volume 223 Issue 3 2015 CONTENTS Articles Out of Focus: Expanding the Definition of Child Pornography in the Military Major Kenneth W. Borgnino 499 The Search for Status: Charting the Contours of Combatant Status in the Age of ISIS Lieutenant Colonel R. Aubrey Davis III 556 Humanitarian Intervention in Syria: Is Crisis Response and Limited Contingency Operations the Solution? Major William D. Hood 610 The Code Indicted: Why the Time is Right to Implement a Grand Jury Proceeding in the Military Major John G. Doyle 629 Jus in Bello Futura Ignotus: The United States, the International Criminal Court, and the Uncertain Future of the Law of Armed Conflict Lieutenant Colonel James T.
    [Show full text]