DOCSLIB.ORG

National Tracking Poll #200766 July 17-19, 2020 Crosstabulation Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Tracking Poll #200766 July 17-19, 2020 Crosstabulation Results National Tracking Poll #200766 July 17-19, 2020 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between July 17-July 19, 2020 among a national sample of 1991 Registered Voters. The interviews were conducted online and the data were weighted to approximate a target sample of Registered Voters based on age, gender, educational attainment, race, and region. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Table Index 1 Table P1: Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? .......... 7 2 Table P3: Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? . 11 3 Table POL1: Thinking about the November 2020 general election for president, Congress, and statewide offices, how enthusiastic would you say you are in voting in this year’s election? . 16 4 Table POL2: Compared to previous elections, are you more or less enthusiastic about voting than usual? ........................................... 20 5 Table POL3: If the election for U.S. Congress in your district was held today, which one of the following candidates are you most likely to vote for? ...................... 24 6 Table POL4_1: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? The economy . 28 7 Table POL4_2: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Jobs . 32 8 Table POL4_3: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Health care . 36 9 Table POL4_4: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Immigration . 40 10 Table POL4_5: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? The environment . 44 11 Table POL4_6: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Energy . 48 12 Table POL4_7: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Education . 52 13 Table POL4_8: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? National security . 56 14 Table POL4_9: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Sexual harassment and misconduct in the workplace ................................ 60 15 Table POL4_10: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Gun policy . 64 16 Table POL4_11: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Protecting Medicare and Social Security ....................................... 68 17 Table POL4_12: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Foreign policy . 72 18 Table POL4_13: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Containing the spread of the coronavirus .................................... 76 19 Table POL4_14: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Economic recovery following the coronavirus .................................... 80 20 Table POL4_15: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Uniting the country 84 21 Table POL4_16: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Leadership during a crisis .............................................. 88 2 National Tracking Poll #200766, July, 2020 22 Table POL4_17: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Relations with China 92 23 Table POL4_18: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following? Race relations . 96 24 Table POL5_1: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? President Donald Trump ................................ 100 25 Table POL5_2: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? Vice President Mike Pence ............................... 104 26 Table POL5_3: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? Congress ........................................ 108 27 Table POL5_4: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? Congressional Democrats ................................ 112 28 Table POL5_5: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? Congressional Republicans ............................... 116 29 Table POL5_6: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? The World Health Organization (WHO) . 120 30 Table POL5_7: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . 124 31 Table POL5_8: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? Your state’s governor .................................. 128 32 Table POL5_9: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coron- avirus? Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 132 33 Table POL6_1: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? The Trump administration ................................... 136 34 Table POL6_2: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? The WHO (World Health Organization) ............................ 140 35 Table POL6_3: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . 144 36 Table POL6_4: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? Congress ............................................. 148 37 Table POL6_5: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? Your state’s governor ...................................... 152 38 Table POL7: Generally speaking, would you say you are more concerned about... 156 3 Morning Consult 39 Table POL8: Currently, do you believe it’s more important for the government to address the: 160 40 Table POL9: Even if neither is exactly correct, which of the following comes closest to your opinion? ............................................. 164 41 Table POL10: As you may know, in response to the coronavirus, Americans have been en- couraged to ’social distance’ with many states canceling upcoming major events and closing schools, restaurants, and other public spaces. Based on what you know, when do you believe Americans will be able to stop social distancing and return to public spaces? . 168 42 Table POL11: Based on what you know about the COVID-19 pandemic (coronavirus), would you support or oppose your state instituting a face mask mandate in public spaces, where not wearing a mask could be punishable by ne or jail time? . 172 43 Table POL12_1: How much have you seen, read, or heard about the following? Mary Trump, the niece of Donald Trump, releasing a tell-all book about her family . 176 44 Table POL12_2: How much have you seen, read, or heard about the following? Joe Biden’s plan to invest $2 trillion over four years in clean energy, infrastructure and job creation, which sets a goal of zero-emissions power generation by 2035 . 180 45 Table POL12_3: How much have you seen, read, or heard about the following? Former na- tional security adviser John Bolton’s book about his tenure at the White House under President Trump .............................................. 184 46 Table POL12_4: How much have you seen, read, or heard about the following? An experi- mental COVID-19 (coronavirus) vaccine made by Moderna being tested on humans . 188 47 Table POL12_5: How much have you seen, read, or heard about the following? Bristol Motor Speedway hosting roughly 20,000 people for the NASCAR All-Star Race, the largest crowd for a U.S. sporting event since live sports were stopped due to the COVID-19 pandemic (coronavirus)192 48 Table POL12_6: How much have you seen, read, or heard about the following? The Depart- ment of Defense effectively banning the display of the Confederate ag on all U.S. military property ............................................. 196 49 Table POL13_1: Thinking about if you found out a public gure had done or said something offensive or controversial, would your opinion change of that person if it had happened: 1 year ago ............................................... 200 50 Table POL13_2: Thinking about if you found out a public gure had done or said something offensive or controversial, would your opinion change of that person if it had happened: 5 years ago ............................................ 204 51 Table POL13_3: Thinking about if you found out a public gure had done or said something offensive or controversial, would your opinion change of that person if it had happened: 10 years ago ............................................ 208 52 Table POL13_4: Thinking about if you found out a public gure had done or said something offensive or controversial, would your opinion change of that person if it had happened: 15 or more years ago ......................................... 212 4 National Tracking Poll #200766, July, 2020 53 Table POL14_1: How comfortable or uncomfortable do you feel posting the following things on social media? Your political views .............................. 216 54 Table POL14_2: How comfortable or uncomfortable do you feel posting the following things on social media? Your religious views ............................. 220 55 Table POL15: To what extent are you familiar with the practice of withdrawing support from public gures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive, often done through social media in the form of group shaming? . 224 56 Table POL16: And have you ever participated in this practice, including sharing your dislike of a public gure or company on social media because of something objectionable or offensive they have done? ........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Tracking Poll 200766
    National Tracking Poll Project: 200766 N Size: 1991 Registered Voters Margin of Error: 2% Topline Report July 17-19, 2020 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 537 27% Wrong Track 1454 73% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues – like taxes, wages, jobs, 635 32% unemployment, and spending Security Issues – like terrorism, foreign policy, and 254 13% border security Health Care Issues – like the 2010 health care law, 394 20% Medicaid, other challenges Seniors Issues – like Medicare and Social Security 295 15% Women’s Issues – like birth control, abortion, and equal 90 5% pay Education Issues – like school standards, class sizes, 116 6% school choice, and student loans Energy Issues – like carbon emissions, cost of 78 4% electricity/gasoline, or renewables Other: 128 6% POL1 Thinking about the November 2020 general election for president, Congress, and statewide offices, how enthusiastic would you say you are in voting in this year’s election? Extremely enthusiastic 852 43% Very enthusiastic 355 18% Somewhat enthusiastic 361 18% Not too enthusiastic 246 12% Not at all enthusiastic 177 9% POL2 Compared to previous elections, are you more or less enthusiastic about voting than usual? More enthusiastic about voting 947 48% About the same 646 32% Less enthusiastic about voting 298 15% Don’t know / No opinion 101 5% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL3 If the election for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Cancel Culture' Doesn't Stifle Debate, but It Does Challenge the Old Order Billy Bragg
    'Cancel culture' doesn't stifle debate, but it does challenge the old order Billy Bragg Speech is only free when everyone has a voice – that’s why young people are angry Outside Broadcasting House in London, the BBC has erected a statue to one of its former employees, George Orwell. The author leans forward, hand on hip, as if to make a telling point. Carved into the wall beside him is a quote from the preface of Animal Farm: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” It’s a snappy slogan that fits neatly into a tweet, but whenever I walk past this effigy of the English writer that I most admire, it makes me cringe. Surely the author of Nineteen Eighty-Four would understand that people don’t want to hear that 2+2=5? For Orwell’s quote is not a defence of liberty; it’s a demand for licence, and has become a foundational slogan for those who wilfully misconstrue one for the other. Over the past decade, the right to make inflammatory statements has become a hot button issue for the reactionary right, who have constructed tropes such as political correctness and virtue signalling to enable them to police the limits of social change while portraying themselves as victims of an organised assault on liberty itself. The latest creation in their war against accountability is “cancel culture”, an ill-defined notion that takes in corporate moves to recognise structural racism, the toppling of statues, social media bullying, public shaming and other diverse attempts to challenge the status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • A New #Metoo Result: Rejecting Notions of Romantic Consent with Executives
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 1-2019 A New #MeToo Result: Rejecting Notions of Romantic Consent with Executives Michael Z. Green Texas A & M University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Z. Green, A New #MeToo Result: Rejecting Notions of Romantic Consent with Executives, 23 Emp. Rts. & Emp. Pol'y J. 115 (2019). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1389 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A NEW #METOO RESULT: REJECTING NOTIONS OF ROMANTIC CONSENT WITH EXECUTIVES BY MICHAEL Z. GREEN* I. INTRODUCTION: #METOO AND THE GROWING DEBATE ON LEGAL CONSENT......................................... ..... 116 II. #METOO AND THE VILE USE OF POWER-DIFFERENTIAL BY EXECUTIVE HARASSERS ........................... ...... 121 III. #METOO BACKLASH AND CLAIMS OF UNCERTAINTY ABOUT WORKPLACE CONSENT ...................................... 126 A. Increasing "Unwelcome" Sexual Harassment Claims as a Result of #MeToo. ........................... ..... 126 B. Resulting Backlash Based on Consent and Unfair Process.......130 C. Dating at Work Being Unnecessarily Regulated........................135 D. Duplicitous Responses Based on Politics ......... ....... 136 E. The Aziz Ansari Experience. .......................... 139 F. Women as the Violators....................... 144 G. Much More Ado Than Should Be Due in the Workplace........... 145 IV. #METoo AND THE BACKBONE TO COME FORWARD DESPITE EXECUTIVE RETALIATION ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of #Metoo
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Antisemitism Rosh Hashanah 5780 September 29, 2019 Rabbi David
    Antisemitism Rosh Hashanah 5780 September 29, 2019 Rabbi David Stern Tonight marks my thirty-first High Holidays at Temple Emanu-El, a huge blessing in my life. In thirty-one years of high holiday sermons, you have been very forgiving, and I have addressed a diverse array of topics: from our internal spiritual journeys to Judaism’s call for justice in the world; relationship and forgiveness, immigration and race, prayer and faith, loving Israel and loving our neighbors; birth and death and just about everything in between in this messy, frustrating, promising, profound, sacred realm we call life. Except -- in thirty-one years as a Jewish leader, I have not given a single High Holiday sermon about antisemitism.1 References, allusions, a pointed paragraph here and there, yes. But in three decades of High Holiday sermons spanning the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first centuries, not a single one about antisemitism. I’m hoping that doesn’t constitute professional malpractice, but it is strange. So I’ve asked myself why. Reason #1: I had almost no experience of antisemitism growing up. With one limited exception, I never even experienced name-calling, let alone any physical incident. All four of my grandparents were born in America, and our story was the classic trajectory of American Jewish integration and success. 1 Professor Deborah E. Lipstadt makes a compelling argument for this spelling. Lipstadt rejects the hyphen in the more conventional “Anti-Semitism” because it implies that whatever lies to the right of the hyphen exists as an independent entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Yom Kippur Morning Service Sermon – Antisemitism Here and Now As
    Yom Kippur Morning Service Sermon – Antisemitism Here and Now As some of you know, I grew up in Spring, Texas a northwestern suburb of Houston. It was not exactly the mecca of Jewish life. I heard the taunts of Jews killed Jesus. I was asked about my horns. I would have to fight every year to be able to take off for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur and not face academic penalties for taking the day. And I would occasionally get into very powerful arguments at football games because I would not stand for a prayer that was offered up at a public high school in the name of a person I did not worship. I had to develop a very thick Jewish skin. This is probably part of the reason why I have made some of the career choices we have made including coming here to Rockland County. Rockland, as I learned in my research, has the largest Jewish population by percentage of any county in the nation. As a result, schools are closed on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Black and white cookies are abundant, and there are delis around just about every corner. There was even a local Jewish Day school they could attend, a blessed memory. What more could a parent want for their Jewish children? Perhaps my children, in this multi-cultural society, and in a diversely Jewish county could escape much of the antisemitism I grew up with… Nope. But before we dive into some of the issues of antisemitism in the county, let’s talks about antisemitism in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Be Strong and Resolute, Be Not in Fear Or in Dread of Them (Deut
    1 Be strong and resolute, be not in fear or in dread of them (Deut. 31:6) The Rise of AntiSemitism and Resisting the Culture of Fear Rosh Hashana Morning 5780 Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana Seems like the news is always bad these days, right? I know, “did you have to remind me?” But although we may all feel that way, it may not be an exact or accurate reflection of reality. Maybe we chose it. A few years ago, two researchers at McGill University in Montreal set up an experiment to try to understand how people relate to the news1. They found that although subjects usually said they preferred to read “good news” and complained that the media was too focused on “negative stories” those same individuals chose to read and read more fully stories with a “negative tone,” stories of corruption, hypocrisy, etc. They chose them even when they were presented with more positive stories as options. In fact, the study found, those who identified themselves as interested in current affairs and politics were particularly likely to choose to read the bad news. Don’t you feel better now? It’s all your fault! The researchers found this to be confirmation of what is called “negativity bias,” psychologists’ term for our desire to hear and remember bad news. The theory goes that there is an evolutionary basis for this – that we evolved with the need to respond quickly to threats. “Bad news,” in this theory, could be a signal for us to change what we are doing to avoid danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism's Life-Changing Ideas a Weekly Reading of the Jewish Bible
    Judaism’s Life-Changing Ideas A Weekly Reading of the Jewish Bible Judaism's Life-Changing Ideas.indd 1 6/8/20 6:29 PM Rabbi Jonathan Sacks JUDAISM’S LIFE-CHANGING IDEAS A Weekly Reading of the Jewish Bible The Phillips Family Edition Maggid Books & OU Press Judaism's Life-Changing Ideas.indd 3 6/8/20 6:29 PM The Phillips family are delighted to support the work of Rabbi Sacks. תשרי תשפ"א ,London, September 2020 Judaism's Life-Changing Ideas.indd 5 6/8/20 6:29 PM Contents Foreword: The Secret of Our Staying Power / Bari Weiss xiii Introduction: The Transformative Power of Ideas xvii Genesis Bereshit The Faith of God 3 Noaĥ The Trace of God 9 Lekh Lekha Inner-Directedness 13 Vayera The Space Between Us 17 Ĥayei Sara The World’s Oldest Man 21 Toledot Why Isaac? Why Jacob? 25 Vayetzeh Out of the Depths 31 Vayishlaĥ The Struggle of Faith 35 Vayeshev Improbable Endings and the Defeat of Despair 39 vii Judaism's Life-Changing Ideas.indd 7 6/8/20 6:29 PM Miketz Jews and Economics 45 Vayigash The First Psychotherapist 51 Vayeĥi What It Takes to Forgive 57 Exodus Shemot God Loves Those Who Argue 65 Va’era Free Will – Use It or Lose It 71 Bo The Story We Tell 77 Beshallaĥ The Longer, Shorter Road 81 Yitro The Bond of Loyalty and Love 85 Mishpatim The Power of Empathy 91 Teruma Why We Value What We Make 97 Tetzaveh Crushed for the Light 103 Ki Tissa Anger – Its Uses and Abuses 107 Vayak’hel Beyond the Self 113 Pekudei Making Space 119 viii Judaism's Life-Changing Ideas.indd 8 6/8/20 6:29 PM Leviticus Vayikra The Call 127 Tzav Giving Thanks 133 Shemini
    [Show full text]
  • Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository #Wetoo
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 4-29-2021 #WeToo Kimberly Kessler Ferzan University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons, Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence Commons, Evidence Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Repository Citation Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, "#WeToo" (2021). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 2332. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2332 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comments Welcome. Do not cite or quote without permission. #WeToo Kimberly Kessler Ferzan The #MeToo movement has caused a widespread cultural reckoning over sexual violence, abuse, and harassment. “Me too” was meant to express and symbolize that each individual victim was not alone in their experiences of sexual harm; they added their voice to others who had faced similar injustices. But viewing the #MeToo movement as a collection of singular voices fails to appreciate that the cases that filled our popular discourse were not cases of individual victims coming forward. Rather, case after case involved multiple victims, typically women, accusing single perpetrators. Victims were believed because there was both safety and strength in numbers. The allegations were not by a “me,” but far more frequently by a “we.” The #MeToo movement is the success of #WeToo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book House
    PETER BLUM GALLERY Where is Our Reckoning? September 29, 2020 Text by Catherine Wagley Mock Bon Appétit cover by Joe Rosenthal (@joe_rosenthal). For weeks, I have been preoccupied with the brilliantly crafted tweets of freelance food and wine writer Tammie Teclemariam, who has been fueling, supporting, and live-tweeting reckonings in food media since early June. Her early grand slam, tweeted alongside a 2004 photo of now-former Bon Appétit editor-in-chief Adam Rapoport in brown face (two anonymous sources sent her the photo, which the editor allegedly kept on his desk),1 read: “I don’t know why Adam Rapoport doesn’t just write about Puerto Rican food for @bonappetit himself!!!”2 Hours later, Rapaport—who, according multiple accounts, nurtured a toxic, discriminatory culture at the publication—had resigned. But perhaps my favorite tweet came after Teclemariam’s tweets contributed to the resignation of Los Angeles Times food section editor Peter Meehan: “I’m so glad the real journalism can start now that everyone is running their mouth.”3 In its glib concision, her tweet underscored the ideal aim of many recent so-called media call-outs: to expose, and hopefully excise, a toxicity that narrows, stifles, and handicaps writing about culture—the importance of which has been underscored by the ongoing uprisings against violent systemic racism. Blumarts Inc. 176 Grand Street Tel + 1 212 244 6055 www.peterblumgallery.com New York, NY 10013 Fax + 1 212 244 6054 [email protected] PETER BLUM GALLERY Not everyone appreciates that tweets like
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Assault in the News
    Minnesota State University, Mankato Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato All Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects Capstone Projects 2021 Sexual Assault in the News Sydney Blair Minnesota State University, Mankato Follow this and additional works at: https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Blair, S. (2021). Sexual assault in the news [Master's thesis, Minnesota State University, Mankato]. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/1132 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects at Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE NEWS by Sydney Blair A Thesis submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Sociology: Human Services Planning & Administration in Sociology and Corrections Department Minnesota State University—Mankato Mankato, Minnesota April 2021 i 04/05/2021 SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE NEWS Sydney Blair This Thesis has been examined and approved by the following members of the students’ committee. Dr. Emily Boyd Advisor X. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Free Speech in the Mirror of Rising Anti-Semitism
    St. Mary's Law Journal Volume 52 Number 2 Article 4 5-2021 Campus Free Speech in the Mirror of Rising Anti-Semitism Harry G. Hutchison The American Center for Law & Justice Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/thestmaryslawjournal Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Higher Education Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Liberal Studies Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Harry G. Hutchison, Campus Free Speech in the Mirror of Rising Anti-Semitism, 52 ST. MARY'S L.J. 419 (2021). Available at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/thestmaryslawjournal/vol52/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the St. Mary's Law Journals at Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. Mary's Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Hutchison: Campus Free Speech in the Mirror of Rising Anti-Semitism ARTICLE CAMPUS FREE SPEECH IN THE MIRROR OF RISING ANTI-SEMITISM HARRY G. HUTCHISON* I. Preamble ................................................................................................. 420 II. Introduction ........................................................................................... 426 III. First Amendment Doctrine ................................................................
    [Show full text]