Panel 1A Panel 1B
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
British Muslims Caught Amidst Fogs—A Discourse Analysis of Religious Advice and Authority
religions Article British Muslims Caught Amidst FOGs—A Discourse Analysis of Religious Advice and Authority Usman Maravia 1,* , Zhazira Bekzhanova 2 , Mansur Ali 3 and Rakan Alibri 4 1 ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS), Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK 2 English Language Program, Astana IT University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; [email protected] 3 Centre for the Study of Islam in the UK, School of History, Archaeology and Religion, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK; [email protected] 4 Department of Languages and Translation, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper discusses the symbolic capital found within Islamic documents that were circu- lated in the UK during the COVID-19 outbreak. Specifically, the work explores “fatwas” and “other” similar documents as well as “guidance” documents (referred to as FOGs) that were disseminated in March–April 2020 on the internet and social media platforms for British Muslim consumption. We confine our materials to FOGs produced only in English. Our study takes its cue from the notion that the existence of a variety of documents created a sense of foggy ambiguity for British Muslims in matters of religious practice. From a linguistic angle, the study seeks to identify (a) the underlying reasons behind the titling of the documents; and (b) the construction of discourses in the documents. Our corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis (CA-CDA) found noticeable patterns that hold symbolic capital in the fatwa register. We also found that producers of “other” documents imitate the fatwa register in an attempt to strengthen the symbolic capital of their documents. -
Front Matter
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-68977-9 - Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence Jonathan Culpeper Frontmatter More information Impoliteness When is language considered ‘impolite’? Is impolite language only used for anti-social purposes? Can impolite language be creative? What is the differ- ence between ‘impoliteness’ and ‘rudeness’? Grounded in naturally occurring language data and drawing on findings from linguistic pragmatics and social psychology, Jonathan Culpeper provides a fascinating account of how impo- lite behaviour works. He examines not only its forms and functions but also people’s understandings of it in both public and private contexts. He reveals, for example, the emotional consequences of impoliteness, how it shapes and is shaped by contexts, and how it is sometimes institutionalised. This book offers penetrating insights into a hitherto neglected and poorly understood phenomenon. It will be welcomed by students and researchers in linguistics and social psychology in particular. jonathan culpeper is based in the Department of Linguistics and English Language at Lancaster University. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-68977-9 - Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence Jonathan Culpeper Frontmatter More information Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics EDITORS Paul Drew, Marjorie Harness Goodwin, John J. Gumperz, Deborah Schiffrin 1 Discourse Strategies John J. Gumperz 2 Language and Social Identity edited by John J. Gumperz 3 The Social Construction of Literacy Jenny Cook-Gumperz 4 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson 5 Discourse Markers Deborah Schiffrin 6 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse Deborah Tannen 7 Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behaviour in Focused Encounters Adam Kendon 8 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings edited by Paul Drew and John Heritage 9 Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations Cecilia E. -
Metaphors for ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Deaths a Health Professional View
Metaphors for ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deaths A health professional view Zsófia Demjén,1 Elena Semino2 and Veronika Koller2 1The Open University / 2Lancaster University This paper discusses the metaphors used by sixteen palliative healthcare profes- sionals from around the United Kingdom in semi-structured interviews to describe what they see as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deaths. The interviews, conducted for the large-scale “Metaphor in End-of-Life Care” project, are set against the background of contemporary practices and discourses around end-of-life care, dying and quality of death. To date, the use of metaphor in descriptions of dif- ferent types of deaths has not received much attention. Applying the Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglejaz Group, 2007) we find that the difference between good and bad deaths is partly expressed via different frequencies of contrasting metaphors, such as ‘peacefulness’ and ‘openness’ as opposed to ‘struggle’ and ‘pushing away’ professional help. We show how metaphors are used to: evaluate deaths and the dying; justify those evaluations; present a remarkably consistent view of different types of deaths; and promote a particular ‘framing’ of a good death, which is closely linked with the dominant sociocul- tural and professional contexts of our interviewees. We discuss the implications of these consistent evaluations and framings in broader end-of-life care contexts, and reflect on the significance of our findings for the role of metaphor in com- munication about sensitive experiences. Keywords: end-of-life care; hospices; medical communication; metaphor; death and dying; good death 1. Introduction This paper focuses on metaphors used to describe ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deaths in semi- structured interviews with sixteen UK-based healthcare professionals in hospice or palliative care. -
Discourse Studies
Discourse Studies http://dis.sagepub.com/ Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA Ruth Wodak Discourse Studies 2006 8: 179 DOI: 10.1177/1461445606059566 The online version of this article can be found at: http://dis.sagepub.com/content/8/1/179 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Discourse Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://dis.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://dis.sagepub.com/content/8/1/179.refs.html Downloaded from dis.sagepub.com at SAGE Publications on March 23, 2011 ARTICLE 179 Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA Discourse Studies Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications. (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) www.sagepublications.com Vol 8(1): 179–190. RUTH WODAK 10.1177/1461445606059566 LANCASTER UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT While reviewing relevant recent research, it becomes apparent that cognitive approaches have been rejected and excluded from Critical Discourse Analysis by many scholars out of often unjustified reasons. This article argues, in contrast, that studies in CDA would gain significantly through integrating insights from socio-cognitive theories into their framework. Examples from my own research into the comprehension and comprehensibility of news broadcasts, Internet discussion boards as well as into discourse and discrimination illustrate this position. However, I also argue that there are salient limits to cognitive theories which have to be taken into account, specifically when proposing social change via rational/cognitive insights. Examples from recent political debates on immigration and from the election campaign in the US in 2004 serve to emphasize these arguments. -
The Discourse of Politics in Action Also by Ruth Wodak
The Discourse of Politics in Action Also by Ruth Wodak DISORDERS OF DISCOURSE (1996) GENDER AND DISCOURSE (1997) THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF NATIONAL IDENTITY (1999, with R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl, K. Liebhart, revised 2nd edition 2009) METHODS OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (2001, with M. Meyer, revised 2nd edition 2009) EUROPEAN DISCOURSES ON UN/EMPLOYMENT (2000, with P. Muntigl, G. Weiss) DAS KANN EINEM NUR IN WIEN PASSIEREN. ALLTAGSGESCHICHTEN (2001) DISCOURSE AND DISCRIMINATION (2001, with M. Reisigl) THE HAIDER PHENOMENON IN AUSTRIA (2002, with A. Pelinka) CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: THEORY AND INTERDISCIPLINARITY (2003, with G. Weiss, 2nd edition 2007) NATO, NEUTRALITY AND NATIONAL IDENTITY (2003, with A. Kovàcs) RE/READING THE PAST (2003, with J. Martin) A NEW AGENDA IN (CRITICAL) DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (2005, with P. Chilton, 2nd edition 2007) THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF HISTORY: REMEMBERING THE WEHRMACHT’S WAR OF ANNIHILATION (2008, with H. Heer, W. Manoschek, A. Pollak) QUALITATIVE DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES (2008, with M. Krzyzanowski)˙ LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE (2008, with V. Koller, Handbook of Applied Linguistics vol. IV) THE POLITICS OF EXCLUSION: DEBATING MIGRATION IN AUSTRIA (2008, with M. Krzyzanowski)˙ THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC SPHERE AND THE MEDIA: EUROPE IN CRISIS (forth- coming, with A. Triandafyllidou and M. Krzyzanowski)˙ The Discourse of Politics in Action Politics as Usual Ruth Wodak Lancaster University © Ruth Wodak 2009 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2011 978-0-230-01881-5 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. -
Journal of Language
Journal of Language Journal and Sexuality New of Language Journal for 2012 issn 2211-3770 / e-issn 2211-3789 and Sexuality Subscription rate Editors Volume 1 (2012) 2 issues, ca. 300 pp. William L. Leap, American University, Washington DC Journal Libraries and Institutions eur 145.00 (print + online) Heiko Motschenbacher, Goethe-University, eur 141.00 (online - only) Frankfurt am Main Private subscriptions eur 70.00 (print + online) of Language Editorial Board (Prices for print + online include postage/handling) Hideko Abe, Colby College, Maine Paul Baker, Lancaster University and Deborah Chirrey, Edge Hill University For sales and delivery within Jennifer Coates, Roehampton University the European Union vat will be Carlos Ulises Decena, Rutgers University Sexuality charged unless a vat identification Kira Hall, University of Colorado number is supplied with the order. Ernest W.B. Hess-Lüttich, Universität Bern Lann Hornscheidt, Humboldt Universität Berlin Peter A. Jackson, Australian National University Subscriptions may be ordered through E. Patrick Johnson, Northwestern University your regular subscription agent Scott F. Kiesling, University of Pittsburgh or directly from the publisher. Celia Kitzinger, University of York Veronika Koller, Lancaster University Erez Levon, Queen Mary, University of London Anthony J. Liddicoat, University of South Australia John Benjamins Publishing Company Georg Marko, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz Subscriptions Liz Morrish, Nottingham Trent University P.O. Box 36224 Sharif Mowlabocus, University of -
Download Download
G&L (PRINT) ISSN 1747–6321 Gender G&L (ONLINE) ISSN 1747–633X and Language Editorial In this editorial we reflect on and celebrate the first five years of the journal, provide our annual profile of contributors, announce important changes to the editorial structure, and describe some up-coming changes to the journal to respond to its continuing expansion and development. Five years of Gender and Language Although the journal Gender and Language has been publishing now for five years, the earliest discussions of the journal occurred over a decade ago. When a number of us first discussed the proposal for the journal at the International Gender and Language Association (IGALA) conference in Lancaster in 2002, there was a debate there that echoes a long-standing one in women and gender studies – the debate about whether a separate journal would constitute a significant forum for work otherwise not fully represented, or a ghetto. Ultimately most of us decided the former. It is worth continuing to think about which kinds of articles on language and gender are submitted to or published in this journal, and which are submitted and published elsewhere. However, one of the significant accomplishments of the journal is creating space, in the kind of peer-reviewed format that counts most heavily in hiring, promotion, and tenure, for scholarship on language and gender. Our journal alone now publishes about ten articles a year, and that number is about to increase (see up-coming changes, below). In our early discussions about the journal, some scholars noted that if we were to start such a journal, we needed to use it to raise the bar on language and gender scholarship. -
Discourse Studies
Discourse Studies http://dis.sagepub.com/ 'Good' and 'bad' deaths: Narratives and professional identities in interviews with hospice managers Elena Semino, Zsófia Demjén and Veronika Koller Discourse Studies 2014 16: 667 originally published online 4 July 2014 DOI: 10.1177/1461445614538566 The online version of this article can be found at: http://dis.sagepub.com/content/16/5/667 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Discourse Studies can be found at: Open Access: Immediate free access via SAGE Choice Email Alerts: http://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://dis.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://dis.sagepub.com/content/16/5/667.refs.html >> Version of Record - Aug 26, 2014 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Jul 4, 2014 What is This? Downloaded from dis.sagepub.com at Vetsuisse Fakultat Universitat on August 26, 2014 DIS0010.1177/1461445614538566Discourse StudiesSemino et al. 538566research-article2014 Article Discourse Studies 2014, Vol. 16(5) 667 –685 ‘Good’ and ‘bad’ deaths: © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: Narratives and professional sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1461445614538566 identities in interviews with dis.sagepub.com hospice managers Elena Semino Lancaster University, UK Zsófia Demjén Open University, UK Veronika Koller Lancaster University, UK Abstract This article explores the formal and functional characteristics of narratives of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deaths as they were told by 13 UK-based hospice managers in the course of semi-structured interviews. The interviewees’ responses include a variety of remarkably consistent ‘narratives of successful/frustrated intervention’, which exhibit distinctive formal characteristics in terms of the starting point and core of the action, the choice of personal pronouns and metaphors, and the ways in which positive and negative evaluation is expressed. -
Composition and TESOL Title Author Call Number Commonplace Learning : Ramism and Its German Ramifications, 1543-1630 / Howard Hotson
Composition and TESOL Title Author Call Number Commonplace learning : Ramism and its German ramifications, 1543-1630 / Howard Hotson. Hotson, Howard. B785.L24 H68 2007 Capturing identity : quantitative and qualitative methods / edited by Meike Watzlawik, Aristi Born. BF76.5 .C34 2007 Keywords in qualitative methods : a vocabulary of research concepts / Michael Bloor and Fiona Wood. Bloor, Michael. H62 .B5856 2006 Situational analysis : grounded theory after the postmodern turn / Adele E. Clarke. Clarke, Adele. H62 .C525 2005 Feminist fieldwork analysis / Sherryl Kleinman. Kleinman, Sherryl. H62 .K586 2007 Qualitative interviewing : the art of hearing data / Herbert J. Rubin, Irene S. Rubin. Rubin, Herbert J. H62 .R737 2005 Radical research : designing, developing and writing research to make a difference / John Schostak and Jill Schostak. Schostak, John F. H62 .S3397 2008 Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics / Neil J. Salkind. Salkind, Neil J. HA29 .S2365 2008b Appreciative inquiry : research for change / Jan Reed. Reed, Jan. HD58.8 .R3798 2007 Next wave cultures : feminism, subcultures, activism / edited by Anita Harris. HQ798 .N49 2008 Doing literacy online : teaching, learning, and playing in an electronic world / edited by Ilana Snyder, Catherine Beavis. LB1575.8 .D65 2004 Literacies, experiences, and technologies : reflective practices of an alien researcher / Sibylle Gruber. Gruber, Sibylle. LB1576.7 .G78 2007 Tests & measurement for people who (think they) hate tests & measurement / Neil J. Salkind. Salkind, Neil J. LB3051 .S243 2006 Women and literacy : local and global inquiries for a new century / edited by Beth Daniell, Peter Mortensen. LC1481 .W664 2007 Literacy and gender : researching texts, contexts and readers / Gemma Moss. Moss, Gemma, 1954- LC149 .M62 2007 "Eyes on the ought to be" : what we teach about when we teach about literacy / Kirk Branch. -
'Kuffar' in Jihadist Propaganda Magazines
From keywords to discursive legitimation: Representing 'kuffar' in jihadist propaganda magazines Anina L. Kinzel College of Arts and Humanities Swansea University Singleton Park Swansea, Wales SA2 8PP [email protected] Abstract had to be written in English and meet the project’s definition of a magazine (Macdonald et al., 2015). This paper explores the integration of Corpus The reason this paper focuses on Dabiq and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Inspire, produced by IS and Al-Qaeda, methodologies, specifically the use of keyword respectively, is that these two groups currently analysis to pinpoint salient discourse pose the biggest terrorist threat to the Western representations of given social identities. The world. Terrorist groups are also often regarded as particular identity examined here is that of ‘kuffar’, which is a derogatory term used by acting the same, especially if they follow a jihadist jihadist-ideology groups to describe people who ideology. However, they might target different do not share their faith. Two measures (Log social groups and compete for recruits in fighting Likelihood and %DIFF) are used to determine a common enemy – usually an out-group who the keyness value of the term kuffar in the does not share their ideology and faith. propaganda magazines produced by two such Comparative research within these groups is groups: Al Qaeda (Inspire) and Islamic State therefore most useful to understand their (Dabiq). Although they yield different keyness similarities and differences. The aim of this paper values, both confirm the salience of this social is twofold: (1) to contribute to the current identity within jihadist propaganda. -
Organizational Decision-Making, Discourse, and Power: Integrating Across Contexts and Scales
Edinburgh Research Explorer Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: integrating across contexts and scales Citation for published version: Kwon, W, Clarke, I & Wodak, R 2009, 'Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: integrating across contexts and scales', Discourse & Communication, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 273-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309337208 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1177/1750481309337208 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Discourse & Communication Publisher Rights Statement: © Clarke, I., Kwon, W. & Wodak, R. 2009, "Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: integrating across contexts and scales", in Discourse & Communication. 3, 3, p. 273-302. The final publication is available at dcm.sagepub.com General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Organizational Decision-making, -
Lesbian Discourses Routledge Studies in Linguistics
Lesbian Discourses Routledge Studies in Linguistics 1. Polari—The Lost Language of Gay Men Paul Baker 2. The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes Graeme Ritchie 3. The Irish Language in Ireland From Goídel to Globalisation Diarmait Mac Giolla Chríost 4. Conceptualizing Metaphors On Charles Peirce’s Marginalia Ivan Mladenov 5. The Linguistics of Laughter A Corpus-assisted Study of Laughter-talk Alan Partington 6. The Communication of Leadership Leadership and Metaphor beyond the West Jonathan Charteris-Black 7. Semantics and Pragmatics of False Friends Pedro J. Chamizo-Domínguez 8. Style and Ideology in Translation Latin American Writing in English Jeremy Munday 9. Lesbian Discourses Images of a Community Veronika Koller Lesbian Discourses Images of a Community Veronika Koller New York London First published 2008 by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Simultaneously published in the UK by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2008. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 2008 Taylor & Francis All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereaf- ter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trade- marks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.