Earthquake Source Properties of a Lower Crust Sequence and Associated Seismicity Perturbation in the SE Carpathians, Romania, Collisional Setting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Earthquake Source Properties of a Lower Crust Sequence and Associated Seismicity Perturbation in the SE Carpathians, Romania, Collisional Setting acoustics Article Earthquake Source Properties of a Lower Crust Sequence and Associated Seismicity Perturbation in the SE Carpathians, Romania, Collisional Setting Anica Otilia Placinta 1, Felix Borleanu 2,* , Emilia Popescu 1, Mircea Radulian 1,3 and Ioan Munteanu 4 1 Department of Research and Development Innovation in Earth Sciences, National Institute for Earth Physics, 12 Calugareni Street, P.O. Box MG2, Magurele, 077125 Ilfov, Romania; [email protected] (A.O.P.); [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (M.R.) 2 National Data Center, National Institute for Earth Physics, 12 Calugareni Street, P.O. Box MG2, Magurele, 077125 Ilfov, Romania 3 Academy of Romanian Scientists, 54 Splaiul Independentei, 050094 Bucharest, Romania 4 Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest, 6 Traian Vuia Street, 020956 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Romanian seismicity is mainly confined to the Eastern Carpathians Arc bend (ECAB), where strong subcrustal earthquakes (magnitude up to 7.9) are generated in a narrow lithospheric body descending into the mantle. The seismic activity in the overlying crust is spread over a larger area, located mostly toward the outer side of the ECAB. It is significantly smaller than subcrustal seismicity, raising controversies about possible upper mantle-crust coupling. A significant earthquake sequence took place in the foreland of the ECAB triggered on 22 November 2014 by a mainshock of Citation: Placinta, A.O.; Borleanu, F.; magnitude 5.7 (the greatest instrumentally recorded earthquake in this region) located in the lower Popescu, E.; Radulian, M.; Munteanu, I. Earthquake Source Properties of a crust. The mainshock triggered a significant increase in the number of small-magnitude events spread Lower Crust Sequence and over an unusually large area in the ECAB. The paper’s goal is to compute the source parameters Associated Seismicity Perturbation in of the earthquakes that occurred during the aforementioned sequence, by empirical application of the SE Carpathians, Romania, Green’s function and spectral ratio techniques. Fault plane solutions are determined using multiple Collisional Setting. Acoustics 2021, 3, methods and seismicity evolution at regional scale is investigated. Our results highlight a still active 270–296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ deformation regime at the edge of the EE Craton, while the source parameters reveal a complex acoustics3020019 fracture of the mainshock and a very high-stress drop. Academic Editor: C. W. Lim Keywords: earthquake sequence; source parameters; seismic source scaling; SE Carpathians foredeep Received: 12 March 2021 Accepted: 8 April 2021 Published: 19 April 2021 1. Introduction Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral The crustal seismicity developed in front of the SE Carpathians bending zone (SEC) is with regard to jurisdictional claims in spread over the entire area between the Neogene Trotu¸sand Intra-Moesian faults (Figure1) . published maps and institutional affil- Crustal earthquakes are generated into a complex structure with significant lateral inhomo- iations. geneities involving different kinematics [1]. This is also reflected in the variability of the focal mechanisms that show consistent stress regime with different localization: normal faulting on the eastern and southern flank of the Foc¸saniBasin (FB), thrust faulting in the area adjacent to the Vrancea subcrustal earthquakes and strike-slip solutions preferably Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. observed along the Peceneaga-Camena Fault [2]. The crustal seismicity in the SEC partly Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. overlaps with the intermediate-depth earthquakes generated in a depth range of 60–180 km, This article is an open access article beneath the Vrancea Zone (Figures1 and2). distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Acoustics 2021, 3, 270–296. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics3020019 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/acoustics Acoustics 2021, 3 271 Acoustics 2021, 3 FOR PEER REVIEW 2 FigureFigure 1.1. (a) Main geological units within the epicentral area (modified(modified afterafter [[3])3]) andand epicentersepicenters distributiondistribution (blue(blue dots)dots) ofof thethe seismicseismic events events associated associated with with the the 2014 2014 M ăMrăă¸se¸stisequence.răşeşti sequence. The The inset inset map map shows shows the study the study area (pinkarea (pink square) square) displayed dis‐ played at the regional scale. The red line represents three vertical cross‐sections crossing the epicentral area. (b) Seismic at the regional scale. The red line represents three vertical cross-sections crossing the epicentral area. (b) Seismic activity activity at the SE Carpathians Arc bend according to the ROMPLUS catalogue (between 2010 and 2014, [4]) colored func‐ at the SE Carpathians Arc bend according to the ROMPLUS catalogue (between 2010 and 2014, [4]) colored function of tion of depth (intermediate‐depth events in black and crustal earthquakes within the color scale—right side), seismic sta‐ depthtions distribution (intermediate-depth (blue triangles) events and in blackneighboring and crustal cities. earthquakes The white dashed within lines the colorrepresent scale—right the local side),fault system; seismic the stations black distributionline shows the (blue Pericarpathian triangles) and Fault. neighboring The inset cities. map shows The white a zoom dashed of the lines epicentral represent area. the The local red fault star system;shows the the mainshock black line showsepicenter. the PericarpathianThe abbreviations Fault. are The as follows: inset map VR—Vrancea shows a zoom Zone, of the IMF—Intra epicentral‐Moesian area. The Fault, red starPCF—Peceneaga shows the mainshock‐Camena epicenter.Fault, AMRR—Amara, The abbreviations PGOR—Pogoanele, are as follows: VR—Vrancea TLB—Topalu Zone, seismic IMF—Intra-Moesian stations. Fault, PCF—Peceneaga-Camena Fault, AMRR—Amara, PGOR—Pogoanele, TLB—Topalu seismic stations. Acoustics 2021, 3 272 Acoustics 2021, 3 FOR PEER REVIEW 3 Figure 2. (a) Epicenters distribution (colored as a function of local magnitude ML) within the epicentral area (0.75 deg. Figure 2. (a) Epicenters distribution (colored as a function of local magnitude M ) within the epicentral area distance around the mainshock) for the seismic activity recorded during a time interval of L100 days (22 November 2014–2 (0.75 deg. distance around the mainshock) for the seismic activity recorded during a time interval of 100 days March 2015) from the mainshock (red star) occurrence; (b) hypocenters distribution displayed in the same area and for the (22 November 2014–2 March 2015) from the mainshock (red star) occurrence; (b) hypocenters distribution displayed in the same time interval mentioned above versus latitude and function of ML and (c) versus longitude and function of ML. same area and for the same time interval mentioned above versus latitude and function of ML and (c) versus longitude and function of ML. The intermediate‐depth seismicity is located in a narrow seismogenic volume which descendsThe intermediate-depthalmost vertically in seismicitythe mantle, is able located to generate in a narrow 2–3 seismogenicstrong events volume (Mw ≥ which7) per century.descends The almost seismicity vertically in the in theoverlying mantle, crust able is to limited generate to 2–3 moderate strong‐ eventssize events (Mw (Mw≥ 7) < per 6) andcentury. spreads The over seismicity a larger in area the overlying following crust some is specific limited alignments. to moderate-size One of events the significant (Mw < 6) seismicallyand spreads active over afaults larger placed area following in front of some the SEC specific is the alignments. Peceneaga One‐Camena of the (PCF) significant fault zoneseismically and related active deformation, faults placed inwhich front delineates of the SEC (Figure is the Peceneaga-Camena 1) the boundary between (PCF) fault the Moesianzone and Platform related deformation,(MP) and North which Dobrogea delineates Orogen (Figure (NDO,1) the[5]). boundary Along its path between towards the NWMoesian from Platform the Black (MP) Sea Basin and North to the Dobrogea SEC, the fault Orogen shows (NDO, two [segments5]). Along with its path distinct towards seis‐ micNW activities: from the Black (1) from Sea the Basin Black to the Sea SEC, Basin the to fault the shows Danube two River, segments and (2) with from distinct the Danube seismic Riveractivities: to the (1) NE from edge the of Black the Vrancea Sea Basin epicentral to the Danube area. The River, first and segment (2) from is theless Danube active with River a stressto the regime NE edge of of thrusting the Vrancea faulting epicentral [6,7], area.while The the firstsecond segment segment is less displays active witha significant a stress seismicregime ofactivity thrusting with faulting predominant [6,7], while strike the‐slip second faulting segment along displays the major a significant fault line seismicand its satellites,activity with oriented predominant SE—NW. strike-slip Towards faulting the NW along edge, the where major the fault PCF line intersects and its satellites,the Peri‐ Carpathian Fault, the seismicity configuration becomes more complex (Figure 1). Acoustics 2021, 3 273 oriented SE—NW. Towards the NW edge, where the PCF intersects the Peri-Carpathian Fault, the seismicity configuration becomes more complex (Figure1). Several studies [7–11] indicate
Recommended publications
  • Coulomb Stresses Imparted by the 25 March
    LETTER Earth Planets Space, 60, 1041–1046, 2008 Coulomb stresses imparted by the 25 March 2007 Mw=6.6 Noto-Hanto, Japan, earthquake explain its ‘butterfly’ distribution of aftershocks and suggest a heightened seismic hazard Shinji Toda Active Fault Research Center, Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), site 7, 1-1-1 Higashi Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan (Received June 26, 2007; Revised November 17, 2007; Accepted November 22, 2007; Online published November 7, 2008) The well-recorded aftershocks and well-determined source model of the Noto Hanto earthquake provide an excellent opportunity to examine earthquake triggering associated with a blind thrust event. The aftershock zone rapidly expanded into a ‘butterfly pattern’ predicted by static Coulomb stress transfer associated with thrust faulting. We found that abundant aftershocks occurred where the static Coulomb stress increased by more than 0.5 bars, while few shocks occurred in the stress shadow calculated to extend northwest and southeast of the Noto Hanto rupture. To explore the three-dimensional distribution of the observed aftershocks and the calculated stress imparted by the mainshock, we further resolved Coulomb stress changes on the nodal planes of all aftershocks for which focal mechanisms are available. About 75% of the possible faults associated with the moderate-sized aftershocks were calculated to have been brought closer to failure by the mainshock, with the correlation best for low apparent fault friction. Our interpretation is that most of the aftershocks struck on the steeply dipping source fault and on a conjugate northwest-dipping reverse fault contiguous with the source fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraplate Earthquakes in North China
    5 Intraplate earthquakes in North China mian liu, hui wang, jiyang ye, and cheng jia Abstract North China, or geologically the North China Block (NCB), is one of the most active intracontinental seismic regions in the world. More than 100 large (M > 6) earthquakes have occurred here since 23 BC, including the 1556 Huax- ian earthquake (M 8.3), the deadliest one in human history with a death toll of 830,000, and the 1976 Tangshan earthquake (M 7.8) which killed 250,000 people. The cause of active crustal deformation and earthquakes in North China remains uncertain. The NCB is part of the Archean Sino-Korean craton; ther- mal rejuvenation of the craton during the Mesozoic and early Cenozoic caused widespread extension and volcanism in the eastern part of the NCB. Today, this region is characterized by a thin lithosphere, low seismic velocity in the upper mantle, and a low and flat topography. The western part of the NCB consists of the Ordos Plateau, a relic of the craton with a thick lithosphere and little inter- nal deformation and seismicity, and the surrounding rift zones of concentrated earthquakes. The spatial pattern of the present-day crustal strain rates based on GPS data is comparable to that of the total seismic moment release over the past 2,000 years, but the comparison breaks down when using shorter time windows for seismic moment release. The Chinese catalog shows long-distance roaming of large earthquakes between widespread fault systems, such that no M ࣙ 7.0 events ruptured twice on the same fault segment during the past 2,000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a Fluvial Harbour on the Danube Delta
    Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a fluvial harbour on the Danube Delta (Dobrogea, Romania) Matthieu Giaime, Gwenaël Magne, Alexandra Bivolaru, Emmanuel Gandouin, Nick Marriner, Christophe Morhange To cite this version: Matthieu Giaime, Gwenaël Magne, Alexandra Bivolaru, Emmanuel Gandouin, Nick Marriner, et al.. Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a fluvial harbour on the Danube Delta (Dobrogea, Romania). The Holocene, London: Sage, 2019, 29 (2), pp.313-327. 10.1177/0959683618810397. hal-01950888 HAL Id: hal-01950888 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01950888 Submitted on 14 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a fluvial harbour on the Danube Delta DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683618810397 10.1177/0959683618810397 (Dobrogea, Romania) Matthieu Giaime,1 Gwenaël Magne,2 Alexandra Bivolaru,3 Emmanuel Gandouin,4 Nick Marriner5 and Christophe Morhange3 Abstract In Northern Dobrogea, north of the Dunavăţ promontory, the Roman fortress of Halmyris was founded in the late 1st century AD on a Getic settlement dating to the middle of the 1st millennium BC, probably associated with a Greek emporium of the Classical and Hellenistic periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Rate Variations Prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 Giant Megathrust Earthquake
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Seismic rate variations prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 giant megathrust earthquake Benoit Derode1*, Raúl Madariaga1,2 & Jaime Campos1 The MW 8.8 Maule earthquake is the largest well-recorded megathrust earthquake reported in South America. It is known to have had very few foreshocks due to its locking degree, and a strong aftershock activity. We analyze seismic activity in the area of the 27 February 2010, MW 8.8 Maule earthquake at diferent time scales from 2000 to 2019. We diferentiate the seismicity located inside the coseismic rupture zone of the main shock from that located in the areas surrounding the rupture zone. Using an original spatial and temporal method of seismic comparison, we fnd that after a period of seismic activity, the rupture zone at the plate interface experienced a long-term seismic quiescence before the main shock. Furthermore, a few days before the main shock, a set of seismic bursts of foreshocks located within the highest coseismic displacement area is observed. We show that after the main shock, the seismic rate decelerates during a period of 3 years, until reaching its initial interseismic value. We conclude that this megathrust earthquake is the consequence of various preparation stages increasing the locking degree at the plate interface and following an irregular pattern of seismic activity at large and short time scales. Giant subduction earthquakes are the result of a long-term stress localization due to the relative movement of two adjacent plates. Before a large earthquake, the interface between plates is locked and concentrates the exter- nal forces, until the rock strength becomes insufcient, initiating the sudden rupture along the plate interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreshock Sequences and Short-Term Earthquake Predictability on East Pacific Rise Transform Faults
    NATURE 3377—9/3/2005—VBICKNELL—137936 articles Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults Jeffrey J. McGuire1, Margaret S. Boettcher2 & Thomas H. Jordan3 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and 2MIT-Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1541, USA 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-7042, USA ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... East Pacific Rise transform faults are characterized by high slip rates (more than ten centimetres a year), predominately aseismic slip and maximum earthquake magnitudes of about 6.5. Using recordings from a hydroacoustic array deployed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, we show here that East Pacific Rise transform faults also have a low number of aftershocks and high foreshock rates compared to continental strike-slip faults. The high ratio of foreshocks to aftershocks implies that such transform-fault seismicity cannot be explained by seismic triggering models in which there is no fundamental distinction between foreshocks, mainshocks and aftershocks. The foreshock sequences on East Pacific Rise transform faults can be used to predict (retrospectively) earthquakes of magnitude 5.4 or greater, in narrow spatial and temporal windows and with a high probability gain. The predictability of such transform earthquakes is consistent with a model in which slow slip transients trigger earthquakes, enrich their low-frequency radiation and accommodate much of the aseismic plate motion. On average, before large earthquakes occur, local seismicity rates support the inference of slow slip transients, but the subject remains show a significant increase1. In continental regions, where dense controversial23.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenţia Judeţeană Pentru Plăţi Şi Inspecţie Socială CONSTANTA RAPORT PRIVIND ALOCAŢIA DE STAT PENTRU COPII Luna De
    Agenţia Judeţeană pentru Plăţi şi Inspecţie Socială CONSTANTA RAPORT PRIVIND ALOCAŢIA DE STAT PENTRU COPII Luna de raportare: 11/2020 Suma totală platită pentru drepturile Localitate Beneficiari plătiţi curente (lei) 23 AUGUST 884 182860 ADAMCLISI 483 97635 AGIGEA 1386 285114 ALBESTI 749 154573 ALIMAN 594 119642 AMZACEA 551 112055 BANEASA 1367 276815 BARAGANU 453 91717 CASTELU 1280 264400 CERCHEZU 281 56401 CERNAVODA 3146 647330 CHIRNOGENI 618 123898 CIOBANU 670 134070 CIOCARLIA 578 116498 COBADIN 1970 397754 COGEALAC 1048 213016 COMANA 452 91716 CONSTANTA 47307 9654867 CORBU 1140 229300 COSTINESTI 544 113520 CRUCEA 540 107812 CUMPANA 2867 587619 CUZA VODA 1325 269413 DELENI 490 97090 DOBROMIR 1242 249458 DUMBRAVENI 101 21077 EFORIE 1493 299573 FANTANELE 292 58804 GARLICIU 298 61386 GHINDARESTI 354 72666 GRADINA 210 42530 HARSOVA 2217 450257 1 Suma totală platită pentru drepturile Localitate Beneficiari plătiţi curente (lei) HORIA 174 36054 INDEPENDENTA 607 122415 ION CORVIN 461 93381 ISTRIA 524 106140 LIMANU 1053 210445 LIPNITA 523 103563 LUMINA 2011 408099 MANGALIA 5957 1202877 MEDGIDIA 7223 1472047 MERENI 531 106331 MIHAI VITEAZU 966 192878 MIHAIL KOGALNICEANU 1626 326938 MIRCEA VODA 1280 261456 MURFATLAR 1956 399028 NAVODARI 6712 1373464 NEGRU VODA 1108 224300 NICOLAE BALCESCU 1112 224304 OLTINA 467 95227 OSTROV 870 174198 OVIDIU 2819 574507 PANTELIMON 453 92269 PECINEAGA 675 136467 PESTERA 688 138872 POARTA ALBA 1384 280144 RASOVA 782 159206 SACELE 471 93943 SALIGNY 382 78582 SARAIU 229 45493 SEIMENI 401 79705 SILISTEA 316 63428 TARGUSOR
    [Show full text]
  • Numărul 1 / 2013
    ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTS ANNALS SERIES ON HISTORY AND ARCHAEOL OGY VOLUME 5 2013 NUMBER 1 ISSN 2067-5682 TOPICS: POLITICS DIPLOMACY SOCIAL LIFE CIVILISATION HABITAT CULTURE ETHNOGRAPHY ART HISTORY Editura ACADEMIEI OAMENILOR DE ŞTIINŢĂ DIN ROMÂNIA Bucureşti ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTS Series on HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY Founding Editor-in-Chief Gen. (r), Professor, M.D., Ph.D., Dr. H.C. Vasile CÂNDEA Founding Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists President of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Series Editor-in-Chief Professor, Ph.D. Ioan SCURTU President of the Historical Sciences and Archaeology section of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Founding Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Coordinator Professor, Timotei URSU, honorary member of Academy of Romanian Scientists Professor, Ph.D. Ioan SCURTU Series Editorial Board Professor, Ph.D. Eric ANCEAU, University IV, Sorbonne, Paris, France Professor, Ph.D. Vasile BORONEANŢ, Bucharest History&Art Museum, Full Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Professor, Ph.D. Constantin BUŞE, University of Bucharest, Full Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Professor, Ph.D. Gheorghe BUZATU, „Ovidius” University, Constanţa, Full Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Professor, Ph.D. Dinu C. GIURESCU, Member of the Romanian Academy Professor, Ph.D. Keith HITCHINS, University of Illinois, USA Professor, Ph.D. Frederick KELLOGG, University of Arizona, USA Professor, Ph.D. Corneliu Mihail LUNGU, Hyperion University, Bucharest, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Professor, Ph.D. Anatol PETRENCU, State University of ChiĢinău Professor, Ph.D. George C. POTRA, European Foundation Titulescu, Corresponding -Director, Full Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Professor, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypocenter and Focal Mechanism Determination of the August 23, 2011 Virginia Earthquake Aftershock Sequence: Collaborative Research with VA Tech and Boston College
    Final Technical Report Award Numbers G13AP00044, G13AP00043 Hypocenter and Focal Mechanism Determination of the August 23, 2011 Virginia Earthquake Aftershock Sequence: Collaborative Research with VA Tech and Boston College Martin Chapman, John Ebel, Qimin Wu and Stephen Hilfiker Department of Geosciences Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4044 Derring Hall Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061 (MC, QW) Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Boston College Devlin Hall 213 140 Commonwealth Avenue Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467 (JE, SH) Phone (Chapman): (540) 231-5036 Fax (Chapman): (540) 231-3386 Phone (Ebel): (617) 552-8300 Fax (Ebel): (617) 552-8388 Email: [email protected] (Chapman), [email protected] (Ebel), [email protected] (Wu), [email protected] (Hilfiker) Project Period: July 2013 - December, 2014 1 Abstract The aftershocks of the Mw 5.7, August 23, 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake were recorded by 36 temporary stations installed by several institutions. We located 3,960 aftershocks from August 25, 2011 through December 31, 2011. A subset of 1,666 aftershocks resolves details of the hypocenter distribution. We determined 393 focal mechanism solutions. Aftershocks near the mainshock define a previously recognized tabular cluster with orientation similar to a mainshock nodal plane; other aftershocks occurred 10-20 kilometers to the northeast. Detailed relocation of events in the main tabular cluster, and hundreds of focal mechanisms, indicate that it is not a single extensive fault, but instead is comprised of at least three and probably many more faults with variable orientation. A large percentage of the aftershocks occurred in regions of positive Coulomb static stress change and approximately 80% of the focal mechanism nodal planes were brought closer to failure.
    [Show full text]
  • URBAN PROJECTS in SCYTHIA MINOR Ioana-Iulia OLARU, Lecturer, Ph.D
    URBAN PROJECTS IN SCYTHIA MINOR Ioana-Iulia OLARU, Lecturer, Ph.D. (George Enescu University of Arts, Iaşi, Romania) Abstract 223 This study presents some examples of cities – Histria, Tomis, Callatis, Tropaum Traiani, L Troesmis, Noviodunum, Arganum, Dinogetia, Capidava – that focus on the urban projects im that the Romans put into practice in the province of Scythia Minor, where they developed ba j Greek urban types in order to put into practice the new conceptions according to which the ş i architectural model of Urbs should be a living example. c o n t Keywords: urban type, architectural model, city. ext Rezumat , A Studiul prezintă câteva exemple de oraşe – Histria, Tomis, Callatis, Tropaeum Traiani, nu Troesmis, Noviodunum, Arganum, Dinogetia, Capidava –, care aduc, în prim-plan, proiecte l I urbanistice pe care romanii le-au pus în practică în provincia Scythia Minor, unde au V dezvoltat tipuri urbanistice greceşti, găsite aici pentru a pune în practică noile concepţii, , vo conform cărora modelul arhitectural al lui Urbs trebuia să fie un exemplu viu. l. Cuvinte-cheie: tip de urbanizare, model arhitectural, oraş. 1 , 201 Immediately after the Roman conquest, urbanism and architecture as well 2 reached their peak of development in ancient times and even in the first part of Late Antiquity. The role of the peripheral regions had started to grow in the Empire, beginning with the period of the Antonions, while the Late Empire, opened by the dinasty of the Severs, affirms its force in architecture, urbanism extending itself in provinces, too. Our newly founded cities will respect the same construction techniques of buildings, the most frequent being opus incertum, opus caementicum, opus quadratum, opus listatum.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt88c3k67v.Pdf
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Early aftershocks and afterslip surrounding the 2015 Mw 8.4 Illapel rupture Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/88c3k67v Authors Huang, H Xu, W Meng, L et al. Publication Date 2017 DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.055 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Early aftershocks and afterslip surrounding the 2015 Mw 8.4 Illapel rupture Author links open overlay panel HuiHuang a WenbinXu bc LingsenMeng a RolandBürgmann b Juan CarlosBaez d Show more https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.055 Get rights and content Highlights • Missing early aftershocks and repeaters are recovered by the matched- filtermethod. • Differential southward and northward expansion of early aftershocks are observed. • Repeaters and geodetic data reveal afterslip around the Illapel mainshock rupture. Abstract On 16 September 2015, the Mw 8.4 Illapel earthquake ruptured a section of the subduction thrust on the west coast of central Chile. The mainshock was followed by numerous aftershocks including some normal-faulting events near the trench. We apply a template matching approach to improve the completeness of early aftershocks within one month of the mainshock. To constrain the distribution of afterslip, we utilize repeating earthquakes among the aftershocks and perform a joint slip inversion of postseismic GPS and InSAR data. The results show that the aftershock zone abruptly expands to the south ∼14 h after the mainshock while growing relatively continuously to the north within the first day. The repeating earthquakes accompanying the early expansion suggest that aseismic afterslip on the subduction thrust surrounding the coseismic rupture is an important triggering mechanism of aftershocks in addition to stress transfer or poroelastic effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Mamuju–Majene
    Supendi et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2021) 73:106 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01436-x EXPRESS LETTER Open Access Foreshock–mainshock–aftershock sequence analysis of the 14 January 2021 (Mw 6.2) Mamuju–Majene (West Sulawesi, Indonesia) earthquake Pepen Supendi1* , Mohamad Ramdhan1, Priyobudi1, Dimas Sianipar1, Adhi Wibowo1, Mohamad Taufk Gunawan1, Supriyanto Rohadi1, Nelly Florida Riama1, Daryono1, Bambang Setiyo Prayitno1, Jaya Murjaya1, Dwikorita Karnawati1, Irwan Meilano2, Nicholas Rawlinson3, Sri Widiyantoro4,5, Andri Dian Nugraha4, Gayatri Indah Marliyani6, Kadek Hendrawan Palgunadi7 and Emelda Meva Elsera8 Abstract We present here an analysis of the destructive Mw 6.2 earthquake sequence that took place on 14 January 2021 in Mamuju–Majene, West Sulawesi, Indonesia. Our relocated foreshocks, mainshock, and aftershocks and their focal mechanisms show that they occurred on two diferent fault planes, in which the foreshock perturbed the stress state of a nearby fault segment, causing the fault plane to subsequently rupture. The mainshock had relatively few after- shocks, an observation that is likely related to the kinematics of the fault rupture, which is relatively small in size and of short duration, thus indicating a high stress-drop earthquake rupture. The Coulomb stress change shows that areas to the northwest and southeast of the mainshock have increased stress, consistent with the observation that most aftershocks are in the northwest. Keywords: Mamuju–Majene, Earthquake, Relocation, Rupture, Stress-change Introduction mainshock from two of the nearest stations in Mamuju On January 14, 2021, a destructive earthquake (Mw 6.2) and Majene are 95.9 and 92.8 Gals, respectively, equiva- between Mamuju and Majene, West Sulawesi, Indonesia, lent to VI on the MMI scale (Additional fle 1: Figure S1).
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Relaxation Arrested the Mainshock Rupture of the 2016
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00231-6 OPEN Stress relaxation arrested the mainshock rupture of the 2016 Central Tottori earthquake ✉ Yoshihisa Iio 1 , Satoshi Matsumoto2, Yusuke Yamashita1, Shin’ichi Sakai3, Kazuhide Tomisaka1, Masayo Sawada1, Takashi Iidaka3, Takaya Iwasaki3, Megumi Kamizono2, Hiroshi Katao1, Aitaro Kato 3, Eiji Kurashimo3, Yoshiko Teguri4, Hiroo Tsuda5 & Takashi Ueno4 After a large earthquake, many small earthquakes, called aftershocks, ensue. Additional large earthquakes typically do not occur, despite the fact that the large static stress near the edges of the fault is expected to trigger further large earthquakes at these locations. Here we analyse ~10,000 highly accurate focal mechanism solutions of aftershocks of the 2016 Mw 1234567890():,; 6.2 Central Tottori earthquake in Japan. We determine the location of the horizontal edges of the mainshock fault relative to the aftershock hypocentres, with an accuracy of approximately 200 m. We find that aftershocks rarely occur near the horizontal edges and extensions of the fault. We propose that the mainshock rupture was arrested within areas characterised by substantial stress relaxation prior to the main earthquake. This stress relaxation along fault edges could explain why mainshocks are rarely followed by further large earthquakes. 1 Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Gokasho Uji, Japan. 2 Institute of Seismology and Volcanology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. 3 Earthquake Research Institute, University of
    [Show full text]