DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2106.09193V1 [Gr-Qc] 17 Jun 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2106.09193V1 [Gr-Qc] 17 Jun 2021 2 like evetns [40]. They show future prospects of detection II. PARAMETER ESTIMATION METHODS of deviations from GR assuming boson stars. We note, however, that the above works do not consider both ef- A. ECO features fects simultaneously but focus on only one of them1. The aim of this work is to give model-independent tests There are several features of ECOs that differ from BH of strong-field gravity regimes from the measurements of (see Refs. [4] for review). In this paper, we focus on the tidal deformability and SIQM via GWs from compact bi- tidal deformability and SIQM. nary inspirals. One motivation to think about BH mim- ickers is to modify the BHs in GR to be compatible with the stringy paradigm as to BH information loss. If we 1. Tidal deformability assume something like a firewall, only the small region near the horizon might be modified, or in other words In the compact binary inspiral, at the leading order, practically only the absorbing boundary condition across the tidally induced quadrupole moment tensor Qij;Tidal the horizon might be modified. This change of boundary is proportional to the companion's tidal field Eij as condition may also result in the modification of tidal de- Qij;Tidal = −λEij. The information about the EOS (or formability, unless the modification is restricted to a re- structure) can be quantified by the tidal deformability ally tiny region in the vicinity of the horizon, e.g., within parameter λ [6]. The leading order tidal contribution the Planck distance from the horizon. (Thus, we think to the GW phase evolution (relative 5PN order) arises non-trivial tidal deformability will not necessarily imply through the symmetric contribution of tidal deformation, smaller compactness.) the binary tidal deformability [6, 7, 47] In this paper, we reanalyze the data around six 4 4 16 (m1 + 12m2)m Λ1 + (m2 + 12m1)m Λ2 low-mass events identified as BBH; GW151226, Λ~ = 1 2 ; (1) 13 (m + m )5 GW170608, GW190707 093326 (hereafter 1 2 GW190707), GW190720 00836 (hereafter GW190720), which is a mass-weighted linear combination of the both GW190728 064510 (hereafter GW190728), and component tidal parameters, where m1;2 is the compo- GW190924 021846 (hereafter GW190924), using an nent mass and Λ1;2 is the dimensionless tidal deformabil- 5 inspiral-only waveform model with both tidal and SIQM ity parameter of each object defined as Λ1;2 = λ1;2=m1;2. terms, and present constraints on the binary tidal For the waveform models used in this paper, the tidal deformability and SIQM at the same time. We focus effects to the gravitational-wave phase are dominated on the inspiral regime because post-inspiral regimes of by the symmetric contributions, Λ~ terms, and the an- binary ECOs are not modeled well. Since the inspiral tisymmetric contributions, δΛ~ terms, are always sub- regime can be accurately described by post-Newtonian dominant [48, 49]. The tidal deformability can char- (PN) formula [5, 42, 43], we use PN inspiral-only acterize the compact objects. Λ for BHs in classical waveform model. GR vanishes as shown for Schwarzschild BH [50, 51] The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In and for Kerr BH [52{54]. For NSs, Λ is a few hun- Sec. II, we explain the methods of Bayesian parameter dred, depending on EOS [8, 47, 55{57]. Upper bound on ~ estimation for GWs including waveform models used to the binary tidal deformability Λ by GW170817 is about analyze. In Sec. III, we present results of our analysis 900 [13, 58] (see also [16, 17] for reanalysis). ECOs differ of GWTC-2 events by using TF2g Tidal SIQM waveform from BHs in classical GR in having nonzero tidal de- model. Section IV is devoted to a summary and conclu- formabilities [38, 39, 59]. It is intriguing that Λ is nega- sion. In Appendix A, we show the results for seven events tive for gravastars [60, 61]. added GW190814 by using the TF2 Tidal SIQM wave- form model. Here, TF2 is the abbreviation of TaylorF2, which is the PN waveform model for point-particle and 2. SIQM spin effects [42, 44, 45] and TF2g is an extended waveform model of TF2 obtained by Taylor-expanding the effective- For a compact object with mass m and the dimen- one-body formula [46]. sionless spin parallel to the orbital angular momentum, χ = S=m2, where S is the magnitude of the spin angular We employ the units c = G = 1, where c and G are momentum of the aligned component, the spin-induced the speed of light and the gravitational constant, respec- quadrupole moment scalar is given by [10] tively. 2 3 QSpin = −(1 + δκ)χ m ; (2) where δκ denotes deviations from the Kerr BHs in GR. The symmetric combination of the deviation parameters of the respective objects, δκ1;2, is defined as δκs = (δκ1 + 1 The analysis in Ref. [41] have considered both effects at one time δκ2)=2. The SIQM can also characterize the compact for Fisher information matrix analysis. objects. For Kerr BH, we have δκ = 0 [10]. For spinning 3 NS, we have δκ ∼ 2 − 20 [62{64]. ECOs differ from We use an extended model of TaylorF2 [42, 44, 45], BHs, having δκ 6= 0: δκ ∼ 10 − 150 for spinning boson TF2g, as ΨBBH(f), which consists of point-particle and stars [65{68]. Interestingly, δκ for gravastar can take spin parts. For TaylorF2 the 3.5PN-order formulas is negative values [61]. employed for the point-particle part of the phase as sum- marized in [45, 69]. For TF2g, the phase of the point- particle part is extended to the quasi-5.5PN-order, which B. Waveform models for inspiraling exotic compact is derived by the Taylor expansion of the effective-one- objects body formula taking into account the notion in the test particle limit [46]. We set the uncalculated terms at 4PN- We use the post-Newtonian (PN) waveform model, order and beyond to zero. The added higher PN-order which can accurately describe the early inspiral regime terms enable to reduce the tidal deformability biasing. for compact binary coalescences [5, 42]. The frequency- The waveform models for both BBH and binary ECO domain gravitational waveform for binary ECOs can be used in our parameter estimation analyses assume that written as the spins of component objects are aligned with the or- bital angular momentum, and incorporate 3.5PN-order ~ iΨBBH(f)+ΨSIQM(f)+ΨTidal(f) hECO(f) = A(f)e ; (3) formula in couplings between the orbital angular momen- tum and the component spins [70], 3PN-order formula in where A(f) is the amplitude of the GW signal and the point-mass spin-spin, and self-spin interactions [71, 72] phase which consists of the BBH phase ΨBBH(f) and as summarized in [69]. The different PN-order terms for the additional SIQM effect ΨSIQM(f) and tidal effect spin effects could help to break degeneracy between pa- ΨTidal(f). We consider the amplitude formula up to rameters. the 3PN-order as summarized in [69], where the point We also use PN formula for the tidal effects. We em- particle and the spin effects are included for both BBH ploy the 2.5PN-order (relative 5+2.5PN-order) tidal-part and ECO hypotheses and the leading order term is ap- of the phase. Recently, Henry, Faye and Blanchet [73] −1 det 5=6 −7=6 proximately written as ∼ dL (M ) f where dL have derived the complete form up to 5+2.5PN-order for is the luminosity distance to the source, and Mdet = the mass quadrupole, current quadrupole, and mass oc- 3=5 1=5 (1 + z)(m1m2) =(m1 + m2) is the detector-frame tupole contributing to the GW tidal phase. We rewrite it (redshifted) chirp mass, which gives the leading-order only for the mass quadrupole interactions as a function evolution of the binary amplitude and phase, and z is of the dimensionless tidal deformability of each object 5 2 the source redshift. defined as Λ1;2 = λ1;2=m1;2 by , 2 3 X 5 Ψ (f) = x5=2 Λ X4 −24(12 − 11X ) − (3179 − 919X − 2286X2 + 260X3 )x HFB 128η A A A 28 A A A A=1 3=2 +24π(12 − 11XA)x 193986935 14415613 57859 209495 965 −5 − X − X2 − X3 + X4 − 4X5 x2 571536 381024 A 378 A 1512 A 54 A A π i + (27719 − 22415X + 7598X2 − 10520X3 )x5=2 ; (4) 28 A A A 2=3 where x = [πMtot(1 + z)f] is the dimensionless PN current quadrupole and mass octupole have been de- expansion parameter, Mtot = m1 + m2 is the total mass, rived [73] and they provide the correct coefficient of rel- 2 η = m1m2=(m1 + m2) is the symmetric mass ratio, and ative 5+2.5PN-order term. Although it is not imple- XA = mA=Mtot, A=1,2. Here, we do not ignore the anti- mented in our analysis, the difference between the correct symmetric contribution δΛ~ terms, while they are always coefficient and the one we used is numerically very small subdominant on the tidal effects to the GW phase, com- and thus should not change much our results. pared with the symmetric contribution Λ~ terms [48, 49]. The leading order effect due to the SIQM appears as a We set the uncalculated terms at relative 5+2PN-order part of spin-spin interactions in the PN phase at relative to zero. We note that recently the complete GW phases 2 PN order [10], and the leading order additional term up to relative 5+2.5PN-order for the mass quadrupole, for binary ECO is described as 2 2 2 2 75 δκ1m1χ1 + δκ2m2χ2 −1=2 ΨSIQM(f) = x : (5) 64 m1m2 2 We will extend the our analysis by adding the current quadrupole In our analysis, we also incorporate relative 3PN correc- and mass octupole interactions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Continuous Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: Current Status and Prospects
    Continuous gravitational waves from neutron stars: current status and prospects Magdalena Sieniawska∗1 and Michał Bejger1 1Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bartycka 18, 00–716 Warszawa, Poland Abstract Gravitational waves astronomy allows us to study objects and events invisi- ble in electromagnetic waves. It is crucial to validate the theories and models of the most mysterious and extreme matter in the Universe: the neutron stars. In addition to inspirals and mergers of neutrons stars, there are currently a few pro- posed mechanisms that can trigger radiation of long-lasting gravitational radiation from neutron stars, such as e.g., elastically and/or magnetically driven deforma- tions: mountains on the stellar surface supported by the elastic strain or magnetic field, free precession, or unstable oscillation modes (e.g., the r-modes). The as- trophysical motivation for continuous gravitational waves searches, current LIGO and Virgo strategies of data analysis and prospects are reviewed in this work. 1 Introduction Gravitational-wave (GW) astronomy has been one of the fastest-growing fields in astro- physics since the first historical detection of a binary black-hole (BH) system GW150814 (Abbott et al., 2016a). In addition to studying the nature of gravitation itself, it may be used to infer information about the astrophysical sources emitting the GWs. This re- view concentrates on a specific kind of prospective GWs: persistent (continuous) grav- itational waves (CGWs), emitted by neutron stars (NSs). The article is arranged as follows. Section1 gathers introductory material: Section 1.1 presents the basics of the GWs theory, Section 1.2 contains a brief overview of GWs detections, Section 1.3 de- arXiv:1909.12600v2 [astro-ph.HE] 5 Nov 2019 scribes properties of NSs and features of hitherto detected NSs-related GWs—a binary NS merger GW170817 (Abbott et al., 2017d), Section 1.4 gathers general information about CGWs, whereas Section 1.5 is devoted to the main data analysis methods used in CGWs searches.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Electron-Antineutrinos Associated with Gravitational-Wave Events GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and GW170817 at Daya Bay*
    Chinese Physics C Vol. 45, No. 5 (2021) 055001 Editors′ Suggestion Search for electron-antineutrinos associated with gravitational-wave events GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and GW170817 at Daya Bay* F. P. An1 A. B. Balantekin2 H. R. Band3 M. Bishai4 S. Blyth5 G. F. Cao6 J. Cao6 J. F. Chang6 Y. Chang7 H. S. Chen6 S. M. Chen8 Y. Chen9,10 Y. X. Chen11 J. Cheng6 Z. K. Cheng10 J. J. Cherwinka2 M. C. Chu12 J. P. Cummings13 O. Dalager14 F. S. Deng15 Y. Y. Ding6 M. V. Diwan4 T. Dohnal16 J. Dove17 M. Dvořák16 D. A. Dwyer18 J. P. Gallo19 M. Gonchar20 G. H. Gong8 H. Gong8 W. Q. Gu4 J. Y. Guo10 L. Guo8 X. H. Guo21 Y. H. Guo22 Z. Guo8 R. W. Hackenburg4 S. Hans4,* M. He6 K. M. Heeger3 Y. K. Heng6 A. Higuera23 Y. K. Hor10 Y. B. Hsiung5 B. Z. Hu5 J. R. Hu6 T. Hu6 Z. J. Hu10 H. X. Huang24 X. T. Huang25 Y. B. Huang26 P. Huber27 D. E. Jaffe4 K. L. Jen28 X. L. Ji6 X. P. Ji4 R. A. Johnson29 D. Jones30 L. Kang31 S. H. Kettell4 S. Kohn32 M. Kramer18,32 T. J. Langford3 J. Lee18 J. H. C. Lee33 R. T. Lei31 R. Leitner16 J. K. C. Leung33 F. Li6 J. J. Li8 Q. J. Li6 S. Li31 S. C. Li27 W. D. Li6 X. N. Li6 X. Q. Li34 Y. F. Li6 Z. B. Li10 H. Liang15 C. J. Lin18 G. L. Lin28 S. Lin31 J. J. Ling10 J. M. Link27 L. Littenberg4 B.
    [Show full text]
  • GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M Black Hole 4 with a 2.6 M Compact Object
    1 Draft version May 21, 2020 2 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 3 GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M Black Hole 4 with a 2.6 M Compact Object 5 LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration 6 7 (Dated: May 21, 2020) 8 ABSTRACT 9 We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 { 24.3 M black hole and 10 a compact object with a mass of 2.50 { 2.67 M (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). 11 The gravitational-wave signal, GW190814, was observed during LIGO's and Virgo's third observing 12 run on August 14, 2019 at 21:10:39 UTC and has a signal-to-noise ratio of 25 in the three-detector 2 +41 13 network. The source was localized to 18.5 deg at a distance of 241−45 Mpc; no electromagnetic 14 counterpart has been confirmed to date. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured +0:008 15 with gravitational waves, 0:112−0:009, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole 16 or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless 17 spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to 0:07. Tests of general relativity reveal no ≤ 18 measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at −3 −1 19 high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1{23 Gpc yr for the new class of binary 20 coalescence sources that GW190814 represents.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2009.06555V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 1 Feb 2021
    KCL-PH-TH/2020-53, CERN-TH-2020-150 Cosmic String Interpretation of NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data John Ellis,1, 2, 3, ∗ and Marek Lewicki1, 4, y 1Kings College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom 2Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 3National Institute of Chemical Physics & Biophysics, R¨avala10, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia 4Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw ul. Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland Pulsar timing data used to provide upper limits on a possible stochastic gravitational wave back- ground (SGWB). However, the NANOGrav Collaboration has recently reported strong evidence for a stochastic common-spectrum process, which we interpret as a SGWB in the framework of cosmic strings. The possible NANOGrav signal would correspond to a string tension Gµ 2 (4×10−11; 10−10) at the 68% confidence level, with a different frequency dependence from supermassive black hole mergers. The SGWB produced by cosmic strings with such values of Gµ would be beyond the reach of LIGO, but could be measured by other planned and proposed detectors such as SKA, LISA, TianQin, AION-1km, AEDGE, Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer. Introduction: Stimulated by the direct discovery of for cosmic string models, discussing how experiments gravitational waves (GWs) by the LIGO and Virgo Col- could confirm or disprove such an interpretation. Upper laborations [1{8] of black holes and neutron stars at fre- limits on the SGWB are often quoted assuming a spec- 2=3 quencies f & 10 Hz, there is widespread interest in ex- trum described by a GW abundance proportional to f , periments exploring other parts of the GW spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning Ensemble for Real-Time Gravitational Wave Detection of Spinning Binary Black Hole Mergers ∗ Wei Wei A,B,C, , Asad Khan A,B,C, E.A
    Physics Letters B 812 (2021) 136029 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Deep learning ensemble for real-time gravitational wave detection of spinning binary black hole mergers ∗ Wei Wei a,b,c, , Asad Khan a,b,c, E.A. Huerta a,b,c,d,e, Xiaobo Huang a,b,f, Minyang Tian a,b,c a National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA b NCSA Center for Artificial Intelligence Innovation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA c Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA d Illinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universe, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA e Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA f Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We introduce the use of deep learning ensembles for real-time, gravitational wave detection of Received 29 October 2020 spinning binary black hole mergers. This analysis consists of training independent neural networks Accepted 10 December 2020 that simultaneously process strain data from multiple detectors. The output of these networks is then Available online 15 December 2020 combined and processed to identify significant noise triggers. We have applied this methodology in Editor: G.F. Giudice O2 and O3 data finding that deep learning ensembles clearly identify binary black hole mergers in open source data available at the Gravitational-Wave Open Science Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds
    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds Nelson Christensen1;2 z 1ARTEMIS, Universit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire C^oted'Azur, CNRS, 06304 Nice, France 2Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA Abstract. A stochastic background of gravitational waves can be created by the superposition of a large number of independent sources. The physical processes occurring at the earliest moments of the universe certainly created a stochastic background that exists, at some level, today. This is analogous to the cosmic microwave background, which is an electromagnetic record of the early universe. The recent observations of gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors imply that there is also a stochastic background that has been created by binary black hole and binary neutron star mergers over the history of the universe. Whether the stochastic background is observed directly, or upper limits placed on it in specific frequency bands, important astrophysical and cosmological statements about it can be made. This review will summarize the current state of research of the stochastic background, from the sources of these gravitational waves, to the current methods used to observe them. Keywords: stochastic gravitational wave background, cosmology, gravitational waves 1. Introduction Gravitational waves are a prediction of Albert Einstein from 1916 [1,2], a consequence of general relativity [3]. Just as an accelerated electric charge will create electromagnetic waves (light), accelerating mass will create gravitational waves. And almost exactly arXiv:1811.08797v1 [gr-qc] 21 Nov 2018 a century after their prediction, gravitational waves were directly observed [4] for the first time by Advanced LIGO [5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(HEASA2018)029 ∗ [email protected] [email protected] Speaker
    Polarization of Gravitational Waves from Binary Systems PoS(HEASA2018)029 L. Nyadzani∗ Centre for Astro-Particle Physics (CAPP) and Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] S. Razzaque Centre for Astro-Particle Physics (CAPP) and Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] Gravitational waves (GWs) are one of the key predictions of Einstein’s theory of general relativity (GR). Scientists have been looking for evidence of GWs since their prediction by Einstein in 1916. The first direct detection was achieved by LIGO in 2015, 100 years after their prediction, from merging of two black holes in a binary into one. According to GR gravitational waves have two independent polarization states. In this paper, we study the power radiated and the strain of GW along the two polarization states from a compact binary system with its general orbital properties. High Energy Astrophysics in Southern Africa - HEASA2018 1-3 August, 2018 Parys, Free State, South Africa ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/ GW Polarizations L. Nyadzani 1. Introduction Gravitational waves are one of the key predictions of Einstein’s theory of general relativity (hereafter GR) [1, 2]. In GR, accelerated massive bodies generate ripples in spacetime. These rip- ples radiate away from their source at the speed of light [3]. The same way the electromagnetic radiation carry information about their origin, GWs also carry information about their origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Gev Gamma-Ray Counterparts of Gravitational Wave
    Draft version July 5, 2018 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX62 Search for GeV Gamma-ray Counterparts of Gravitational Wave Events by CALET O. Adriani,1,2 Y. Akaike,3,4 K. Asano,5 Y. Asaoka,6,7 M.G. Bagliesi,8,9 E. Berti,1,2 G. Bigongiari,8,9 W.R. Binns,10 S. Bonechi,8,9 M. Bongi,1,2 P. Brogi,8,9 J.H. Buckley,10 N. Cannady,11 G. Castellini,12 C. Checchia,13, 14 M.L. Cherry,11 G. Collazuol,13,14 V. Di Felice,15,16 K. Ebisawa,17 H. Fuke,17 T.G. Guzik,11 T. Hams,3,18 M. Hareyama,19 N. Hasebe,6 K. Hibino,20 M. Ichimura,21 K. Ioka,22 W. Ishizaki,5 M.H. Israel,10 K. Kasahara,6 J. Kataoka,6 R. Kataoka,23 Y. Katayose,24 C. Kato,25 N. Kawanaka,26, 27 Y. Kawakubo,28 H.S. Krawczynski,10 J.F. Krizmanic,18,3 K. Kohri,29 T. Lomtadze,9 P. Maestro,8,9 P.S. Marrocchesi,8,9 A.M. Messineo,30,9 J.W. Mitchell,4 S. Miyake,31 A.A. Moiseev,32, 18 K. Mori,6,17 M. Mori,33 N. Mori,2 H.M. Motz,34 K. Munakata,25 H. Murakami,6 S. Nakahira,35 J. Nishimura,17 G.A. de Nolfo,36 S. Okuno,20 J.F. Ormes,37 S. Ozawa,6 L. Pacini,1,12,2 F. Palma,15,16 P. Papini,2 A.V. Penacchioni,8,38 B.F. Rauch,10 S.B. Ricciarini,12,2 K.
    [Show full text]
  • New Physics and the Black Hole Mass Gap
    New physics and the Black Hole Mass Gap Djuna Lize Croon (TRIUMF) University of Michigan, September 2020 [email protected] | djunacroon.com GW190521 LIGO/Virgo’s biggest discovery yet: the impossible black holes Phys. Rev. Le?. 125, 101102 (2020). From R. Abbo? et al. (LIGO ScienCfic CollaboraCon and Virgo CollaboraCon), GW190521 LIGO/Virgo’s biggest discovery yet: the impossible black holes Phys. Rev. Le?. 125, 101102 (2020). From R. Abbo? et al. (LIGO ScienCfic CollaboraCon and Virgo CollaboraCon), GW190521 LIGO/Virgo’s biggest discovery yet: the impossible black holes … let’s wind back a bit “The Stellar Binary mergers in LIGO/Virgo O1+O2 Graveyard” Adapted from LIGO-Virgo, Frank Elavsky, Aaron Geller “The Stellar Binary mergers in LIGO/Virgo O1+O2 Graveyard” Mass Gap? “Mass Gap” Adapted from LIGO-Virgo, Frank Elavsky, Aaron Geller What populates the stellar graveyard? • In the LIGO/Virgo mass range: remnants of heavy, low-metallicity population-III stars • Primarily made of hydrogen (H) and helium (He) • Would have existed for z ≳ 6, M ∼ 20 − 130 M⊙ • Have not been directly observed yet (JWST target) • Collapsed into black holes in core-collapse supernova explosions. (Or did they?) • We study their evolution from the Zero-Age Helium Branch (ZAHB) <latexit sha1_base64="PYrKTlHPDF1/X3ZrAR6z/bngQPE=">AAACBHicdVDLSgMxFM34rPU16rKbYBFcDTN1StuFUHTjplDBPqAtQyZN29BMMiQZoQxduPFX3LhQxK0f4c6/MX0IKnrgwuGce7n3njBmVGnX/bBWVtfWNzYzW9ntnd29ffvgsKlEIjFpYMGEbIdIEUY5aWiqGWnHkqAoZKQVji9nfuuWSEUFv9GTmPQiNOR0QDHSRgrsXC1IuzKClE/PvYI757Vp0BV9oQM77zquXywWPeg6Z5WS75cNqZS8sleBnuPOkQdL1AP7vdsXOIkI15ghpTqeG+teiqSmmJFptpsoEiM8RkPSMZSjiKheOn9iCk+M0ocDIU1xDefq94kURUpNotB0RkiP1G9vJv7ldRI9KPdSyuNEE44XiwYJg1rAWSKwTyXBmk0MQVhScyvEIyQR1ia3rAnh61P4P2kWHM93Ktd+vnqxjCMDcuAYnAIPlEAVXIE6aAAM7sADeALP1r31aL1Yr4vWFWs5cwR+wHr7BCb+l9Y=</latexit>
    [Show full text]
  • Correlations in Parameter Estimation of Low-Mass Eccentric Binaries: GW151226 & GW170608
    Correlations in parameter estimation of low-mass eccentric binaries: GW151226 & GW170608 Eamonn O'Shea1, ∗ and Prayush Kumar1, 2 1Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA 2International Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560089, India (Dated: July 19, 2021) The eccentricity of binary black hole mergers is predicted to be an indicator of the history of their formation. In particular, eccentricity is a strong signature of dynamical formation rather than formation by stellar evolution in isolated stellar systems. It has been shown that searches for eccentric signals with quasi-circular templates can lead to loss of SNR, and some signals could be missed by such a pipeline. We investigate the efficacy of the existing quasi-circular parameter estimation pipelines to determine the source parameters of such eccentric systems. We create a set of simulated signals with eccentricity up to 0.3 and find that as the eccentricity increases, the recovered mass parameters are consistent with those of a binary with up to a ≈ 10% higher chirp mass and mass ratio closer to unity. We also employ a full inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model to perform parameter estimation on two gravitational wave events, GW151226 and GW170608, to investigate this bias on real data. We find that the correlation between the masses and eccentricity persists in real data, but that there is also a correlation between the measured eccentricity and effective spin. In particular, using a non-spinning prior results in a spurious eccentricity measurement for GW151226. Performing parameter estimation with an aligned spin, eccentric model, we constrain the eccentricities of GW151226 and GW170608 to be < 0:15 and < 0:12 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(HEASA2017)001 ∗ [email protected] Speaker
    Current status of gravitational wave observations PoS(HEASA2017)001 Nigel T. Bishop∗ Rhodes University E-mail: [email protected] We review LIGO and VIRGO detection events reported so far, as well as future prospects. We also review the prospects for gravitational wave measurements, but in lower frequency bands, from pulsar timing arrays, and from the space system LISA. 5th Annual Conference on High Energy Astrophysics in Southern Africa 4-6 October, 2017 University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), South Africa ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). https://pos.sissa.it/ Gravitational wave observations Nigel T. Bishop 1. Introduction Advanced LIGO has completed its first observation runs (O1: 2015.09.29 to 2016.01.12, O2: 2016.11.30 to 2017.08.25); Virgo has also come on line and completed its first observation run 2017.07.28 to 2017.08.25. To date, there have been reported 5 definite and 1 probable black hole mergers, GW150914, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814 and LVT151012; and one neutron star merger event, with an electromagnetic counterpart, GW170817. Other sig- nals that were possibly expected, have not been observed, including burst events such as Galactic supernovas and cosmic string interactions, and continuous sources caused by the rotation of a non- PoS(HEASA2017)001 axisymmetric body examples being the Crab, Vela and other pulsars. Even such non-detections provide constraints on astrophysical models. The limited results obtained so far have already had an impact on theoretical astrophysics, since an expalanation for the origin of black holes with mass O(30M ) is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing Einstein-Dilaton Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with the Inspiral and Ringdown of Gravitational Waves
    Probing Einstein-dilaton Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with the inspiral and ringdown of gravitational waves Zack Carson and Kent Yagi Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA (Dated: May 19, 2020) Gravitational waves from extreme gravity events such as the coalescence of two black holes in a binary system fill our observable universe, bearing with them the underlying theory of gravity driving their process. One compelling alternative theory of gravity { known as Einstein-dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity motivated by string theory { describes the presence of an additional dilaton scalar field coupled directly to higher orders of the curvature, effectively describing a “fifth force" interaction and the emission of scalar dipole radiation between two scalarized black holes. Most pre- vious studies focused on considering only the leading correction to the inspiral portion of the binary black hole waveforms. In our recent paper, we carried out inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency tests in this string-inspired gravity by including corrections to both the inspiral and ringdown portions, as well as those to the mass and spin of remnant black holes, valid to quadratic order in spin. We here extend the analysis by directly computing bounds on the theoretical coupling constant using the full inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform rather than treating the inspiral and merger-ringdown portions separately. We also consider the corrections valid to quartic order in spin to justify the validity of black hole's slow-rotation approximation. We find the quasinormal mode corrections to the waveform to be particularly important for high-mass events such as GW170729, in which the dilaton fields’ small-coupling approximation fails without such effects included.
    [Show full text]