DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical Evidence Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical Evidence Manual PHYSICAL EVIDENCE MANUAL OREGON STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION Version #10 Originally Adopted: 05/01/2002 ISSUING AUTHORITY: OPERATIONS MANAGER Revision Effective Date: 09/17/2018 ALL COPIES OUTSIDE OF POLICYTECH ARE UNCONTROLLED Page 1 of 99 OREGON STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION PHYSICAL EVIDENCE MANUAL PREFACE PREFACE The purpose of this manual is to give direction to our customers in the Criminal Justice System regarding the services provided by the Oregon State Police Forensic Services Division (OSP FSD), and the recommended methods of collecting and preserving physical evidence. Additionally, this manual contains evidence submission acceptance criteria for items in need of forensic examination. The recommendations and the criteria help to ensure the integrity of the evidence and best analytical results. Every attempt has been made to make this handbook as current and up-to-date as possible; however, it should be noted that the field of forensic science is changing at a rapid rate. New techniques and procedures are constantly being developed, providing new capabilities or refinements to existing capabilities. Consequently, techniques, procedures and capabilities contained herein may change in the future. All agencies are encouraged to keep in regular contact with their local laboratory to keep abreast of any such changes. This handbook will be stored on the State Police Internet site: http://www.oregon.gov/osp/FORENSICS/Pages/OSP%20FORENSICS.aspx Version #10 Originally Adopted: 05/01/2002 ISSUING AUTHORITY: OPERATIONS MANAGER Revision Effective Date: 09/17/2018 ALL COPIES OUTSIDE OF POLICYTECH ARE UNCONTROLLED Page 2 of 99 OREGON STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION PHYSICAL EVIDENCE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Forensic Services Division Mission Statement .............................................................................. 8 2.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 9 3.0 Laboratory Locations and Services ............................................................................................. 11 4.0 Case Communication .................................................................................................................. 13 5.0 Cancellation of Requested Analysis .......................................................................................... 14 6.0 General Evidence Handling ......................................................................................................... 15 6.1 General Evidence Handling Guidelines ................................................................................ 15 6.2 Evidence Collection .............................................................................................................. 15 6.3 Chain of Custody (COC) ....................................................................................................... 18 6.4 Forensic Services Request Form ......................................................................................... 19 7.0 Laboratory Reports ...................................................................................................................... 22 7.1 Laboratory Online Information System (LOIS) ...................................................................... 22 7.2 Forensic Laboratory Evaluation Form and Surveys .............................................................. 22 8.0 Field Investigations (Crime Scenes) ............................................................................................ 23 8.1 Crime Scene Services Offered ............................................................................................. 23 8.2 Crime Scene Photography ................................................................................................... 24 8.3 Vehicle Examinations ........................................................................................................... 24 8.4 Body Processing .................................................................................................................. 25 8.5 Postmortem Examinations .................................................................................................... 25 8.6 Decomposed Remains ......................................................................................................... 26 9.0 Missing Persons (‘MP’) ................................................................................................................ 27 9.1 Secondary Standards or Direct Reference Sample .............................................................. 27 9.2 DNA from the Missing Person’s Relatives (Family Reference Standards) ............................ 27 9.3 Family Reference Standard Collection ................................................................................ 28 10.0 Unidentified Remains .................................................................................................................. 29 10.1 Unidentified Remains ........................................................................................................... 29 Version #10 Originally Adopted: 05/01/2002 ISSUING AUTHORITY: OPERATIONS MANAGER Revision Effective Date: 09/17/2018 ALL COPIES OUTSIDE OF POLICYTECH ARE UNCONTROLLED Page 3 of 99 OREGON STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION PHYSICAL EVIDENCE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.2 Identifying the Deceased ...................................................................................................... 29 11.0 Biological Evidence ..................................................................................................................... 31 11.1 Safety and Contamination Prevention .................................................................................. 31 11.2 General Collection Guidelines .............................................................................................. 31 11.3 Alternate Light Source Searches .......................................................................................... 32 11.4 Blood Evidence .................................................................................................................... 33 11.5 Saliva Evidence .................................................................................................................... 34 11.6 Semen Evidence .................................................................................................................. 35 11.7 Adult and Child Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence (SAFE-A and SAFE-C) Kits ................... 35 11.8 Penile Swabbing Forensic Evidence (PSFE) Kits ................................................................. 36 12.0 DNA Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 38 12.1 Body Fluid Analysis .............................................................................................................. 39 12.2 Wearer DNA ......................................................................................................................... 39 12.3 Aggressive Handling DNA .................................................................................................... 39 12.4 Touch DNA........................................................................................................................... 39 12.5 Criminal Paternity ................................................................................................................. 40 12.6 Y-STR Analysis .................................................................................................................... 40 12.7 DNA Standards .................................................................................................................... 41 12.8 Decomposed Remains ......................................................................................................... 42 12.9 Secondary Standards ........................................................................................................... 42 12.10 No Available Suspect Standards ....................................................................................... 42 12.11 High Throughput Property Crimes Program ...................................................................... 42 12.12 Private Laboratory Analysis .............................................................................................. 42 13.0 Latent Print Evidence .................................................................................................................. 43 13.1 Collection, Packaging, and Submission of Evidence ............................................................ 43 13.2 Submission of Inked Prints for Comparison Purposes .......................................................... 45 Version #10 Originally Adopted: 05/01/2002 ISSUING AUTHORITY: OPERATIONS MANAGER Revision Effective Date: 09/17/2018 ALL COPIES OUTSIDE OF POLICYTECH ARE UNCONTROLLED Page 4 of 99 OREGON STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION PHYSICAL EVIDENCE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 13.3 Automated Biometric Identification System (ABIS) ............................................................... 45 13.4 Identifying the Deceased ...................................................................................................... 46 14.0 Drug Chemistry ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dinosaur Wars Program Transcript
    Page 1 Dinosaur Wars Program Transcript Narrator: For more than a century, Americans have had a love affair with dinosaurs. Extinct for millions of years, they were barely known until giant, fossil bones were discovered in the mid-nineteenth century. Two American scientists, Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh, led the way to many of these discoveries, at the forefront of the young field of paleontology. Jacques Gauthier, Paleontologist: Every iconic dinosaur every kid grows up with, apatosaurus, triceratops, stegosaurus, allosaurus, these guys went out into the American West and they found that stuff. Narrator: Cope and Marsh shed light on the deep past in a way no one had ever been able to do before. They unearthed more than 130 dinosaur species and some of the first fossil evidence supporting Darwin’s new theory of evolution. Mark Jaffe, Writer: Unfortunately there was a more sordid element, too, which was their insatiable hatred for each other, which often just baffled and exasperated everyone around them. Peter Dodson, Paleontologist: They began life as friends. Then things unraveled… and unraveled in quite a spectacular way. Narrator: Cope and Marsh locked horns for decades, in one of the most bitter scientific rivalries in American history. Constantly vying for leadership in their young field, they competed ruthlessly to secure gigantic bones in the American West. They put American science on the world stage and nearly destroyed one another in the process. Page 2 In the summer of 1868, a small group of scientists boarded a Union Pacific train for a sightseeing excursion through the heart of the newly-opened American West.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Federal Response to Sexual Violence in Indian Country
    BYSTANDER NO MORE? IMPROVING THE FEDERAL RESPONSE TO SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN INDIAN COUNTRY Sarah Deer* If the Tribal Law and Order Act had existed 16 years ago, my story would be very different . [After I was sexually assaulted in 1994] I received medical treatment at the Indian Health Services hospital but no doctors talked to me about the rape. I had to wait all night for someone to collect DNA. Tribal police suspected a local man but no federal investigators interviewed me. Federal authorities declined to get involved because the attacker had not used a weapon . He was never prosecuted for raping me.1 Lisa Marie Iyotte July 29, 2010 The White House Washington, D.C. When one in three Native American women will be raped in their lifetimes, that is an assault on our national conscience; it is an affront to our shared humanity; it is something that we cannot allow to continue.2 President Barack Obama July 29, 2010 The White House Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION In contemporary discussions about sexual assault prevention, the role of bystanders has become a common theme. Efforts to educate potential bystanders to identify “red flags” for potential sexual assault are thought to enhance the likelihood that there will be intervention in problematic situations before an assault takes place. In general, the obligations of bystanders are fraught with different legal philosophies about the moral or legal duty of one who observes, but does not intervene.3 Black’s Law Dictionary defines bystander as “One who stands near; a chance looker-on; hence one who has not concern with the business being * © 2017 Sarah Deer.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottsdale Police Department
    SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2007 ANNUAL REPORT SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA y y y y Table of Contents Scottsdale Police Department’s Mission ............................................................................................................ 1 From the Desk of Chief Alan Rodbell.................................................................................................................. 3 2007 City of Scottsdale Statistics........................................................................................................................ 5 2007 Crime Clock .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Command Staff...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Department Organization ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Awards & Recognitions...................................................................................................................................... 13 Office of the Chief ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Staff Commander.............................................................................................................................................. 19 Budget Office ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Complicated Views: Mainstream Cinema's Representation of Non
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Author (Year of Submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University Faculty or School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Data: Author (Year) Title. URI [dataset] University of Southampton Faculty of Arts and Humanities Film Studies Complicated Views: Mainstream Cinema’s Representation of Non-Cinematic Audio/Visual Technologies after Television. DOI: by Eliot W. Blades Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2020 University of Southampton Abstract Faculty of Arts and Humanities Department of Film Studies Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Complicated Views: Mainstream Cinema’s Representation of Non-Cinematic Audio/Visual Technologies after Television. by Eliot W. Blades This thesis examines a number of mainstream fiction feature films which incorporate imagery from non-cinematic moving image technologies. The period examined ranges from the era of the widespread success of television (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 TRASH Regionals Round 10 Tossups 1. This Person Is Deemed
    2008 TRASH Regionals Round 10 Tossups 1. This person is deemed superior to both Francesca in the Guggenheim and a social psychology professor in Baskin- Robbins. She likes her Scotch aged eighteen years. Her name is Janine, although she doesn't want to be called that. She has been encountered in a car by the side of the road, in a tub, and on a pool table, with the latter fulfilling her paramour's prom night pact. John, played by John Cho, popularized the term "MILF" in describing, for ten points, what older woman played by Jennifer Coolidge, the lover of Finch in the American Pie movies? Answer: Stifler's Mom or Mrs. Stifler (accept Janine Stifler on early buzz) 2. His 1984 graphical text adventure, Amazon, sold 100,000 copies. A personal friend of Jasper Johns, he published an appreciation of his work, as well as a book on BASIC programming, Electronic Life. Hollywood work included the script for Extreme Close Up as well as directing Looker and Physical Evidence. His pen names included Michael Lange, a pun on the German word for "tall", and Jeffrey Hudson, the name of a 17th century dwarf, under which he wrote A Case of Need. For ten points, name this author of The Terminal Man, Congo, and State of Fear, who recently died of cancer at the age of 66. Answer: Michael Crichton 3. This show's second episode, "Birdcage," featured a cameo by Audrina Partridge from The Hills. The third, "Dosing," sees the staff's bonus checks held hostage to a feud between the general manager, Neal, and HR director Rhonda, which is defused when the owner's wife tries to seduce Neal.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Resurrecting Tyrannosaurus Rex Lauren E. Ammerman Director: Jennifer Good, Ph.D. After the First Successful Extraction
    ABSTRACT Resurrecting Tyrannosaurus rex Lauren E. Ammerman Director: Jennifer Good, Ph.D. After the first successful extraction of ancient DNA from a fossilized Quagga in 1984, the subsequent development of PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) technology opened up a plethora of possibilities in the field of molecular paleontology. Supplied with fragmented ancient genomes, some scientists acted as if the days of resurrecting dinosaurs were a few technical difficulties away. Theories surfaced on the possible applications of ancient DNA technology, and some, such as creating tactical dinosaurs for the U.S. military, were outrageous. A less ridiculous idea surfaced in the form of Michael Crichton’s Jurassic Park, published in 1990. Coupled with Steven Spielberg’s 1993 feature film adaption, the Jurassic Park series created a world in which genetically- engineered dinosaurs roamed once again as theme park attractions on a billionaire’s private island, and explored the possible outcomes of a “Jurassic Park” experiment. Jurassic Park ignited scientific debate over the technological feasibility, environmental impact, and ethical questions of a “Jurassic Park” experiment. This thesis continues that conversation by asking, could resurrecting a dinosaur be a productive environmental enterprise, other than a mere display of power over Nature? Focusing on Tyrannosaurus rex, this thesis combines a brief survey the current state of dinosaur genetic research, with analyses of rewilding with large predators, to discuss whether or not scientists should ever attempt to re-create a T. rex in the future. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS Dr. Jennifer Good, Director of University Scholars APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Director DATE: RESURRECTING TYRANNOSAURUS REX A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Lauren E.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Sex Rings: a Behavioral Analysis for Criminal Justice Professionals Handling Cases of Child Sexual ~ Exploitation
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISt.f9IN(. 1~"I"j('lrl'l~I) -----1.---' CHI L D R E N Child Sex Rings: A Behavioral Analysis For Criminal Justice Professionals Handling Cases of Child Sexual ~ Exploitation In cooperation with the Federal Bureau of Investigation ------------------ 149214 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been grantedNaElona1 by • center f'or Mlsslng . & Exploited Chi1dren/DOJ/FBI to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner. Child Sex Rings: A Behavioral Analysis For Criminal Justice Professionals Handling Cases of Child Sexual Exploitation April 1992 Second Edition Kenneth V. Lanning Supervisory Special Agent Behavioral Science Unit Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Academy Quantico, Virginia © National Center for Missing & Exploited Children Dedication This book is dedicated to the victims of child sex rings and to the memory of two FBI agents who devoted their professional lives to helping sexually exploited children. Leo E. Brunnick FBI Boston, Massachusetts Alan V. MacDonald FBI Boston, Massachusetts Contents Author's Preface v 1. Historical Overview 1 "Stranger Danger" 1 Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse 2 Return to "Stranger Danger" 2 The Acquaintance Molester 3 Satanism: A "New" Form of "Stranger Danger" 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Remixing Generalized Symbolic Media in the New Scientific Novel Søren Brier
    Ficta: remixing generalized symbolic media in the new scientific novel Søren Brier To cite this version: Søren Brier. Ficta: remixing generalized symbolic media in the new scientific novel. Public Un- derstanding of Science, SAGE Publications, 2006, 15 (2), pp.153-174. 10.1177/0963662506059441. hal-00571086 HAL Id: hal-00571086 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571086 Submitted on 1 Mar 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SAGE PUBLICATIONS (www.sagepublications.com) PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE Public Understand. Sci. 15 (2006) 153–174 Ficta: remixing generalized symbolic media in the new scientific novel1 Søren Brier This article analyzes the use of fictionalization in popular science commu- nication as an answer to changing demands for science communication in the mass media. It concludes that a new genre—Ficta—arose especially with the work of Michael Crichton. The Ficta novel is a fiction novel based on a real scientific problem, often one that can have or already does have serious consequences for our culture or civilization. The Ficta novel is a new way for the entertainment society to reflect on scientific theories, their consequences and meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinephilia and Online Communities Copyright 2013
    CINEPHILIA AND ONLINE COMMUNITIES A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Stuart Collier In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Science, Technology and Culture in the School of Literature, Media, and Communication Georgia Institute of Technology August 2013 COPYRIGHT 2013 BY STUART COLLIER Collier 2 CINEPHILIA AND ONLINE COMMUNITIES Approved by: Dr. JC Reilly, Advisor School of Literature, Media, and Communications Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Vinicius Navarro School of Literature, Media, and Communications Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Angela Dalle Vacche School of Literature, Media, and Communications Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: May 5, 2013 Collier 3 INTRODUCTION Cinephilia, broadly defined, means ‘love for cinema.’ Many people love movies, and for a variety of reasons, but for cinephiles that love runs far deeper than the desire to be entertained. Cinephiles are marked by a passion for cinema, one often defined in terms of aesthetic appreciation, consumption of film criticism, and a tendency to seek out what is marginalized or undervalued in filmmaking. On the surface, cinephilia seems to refer to a specialized fan enterprise with no larger significance. However, cinephilia has been integral to the historical evolution of cinema, spurring on new artistic traditions and modes of critical thought, and keying in on larger paradigmatic issues of information circulation and media consumption. The 1960s surge in cinematic modernism and auteur theory, the proliferation of underground video trading and cult film enthusiasm in the 70s and 80s, and the globalism of contemporary film culture are all directly tied to cinephilic activism. While cinephilia has led to well-documented reverberations within film culture since the beginning of the twentieth century, the steady rise of digital media over the past two decades has radically transformed the nature of its productivity into something with readily observable implications for all forms of media consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Case
    C H A P T E R O N E Introduction: The Case From William Powell to Humphrey Bogart—or debonair to tough; from Bruce Willis to William Petersen—or wisecracking to wise: the celluloid de- tective has evolved over time, processing society’s fears about crime and artic- ulating debates about law enforcement and justice. The 1980s saw cinematic justice exacted by muscle and firepower; today it is pursued with science and brainpower—or what Agatha Christie’s sleuth Hercule Poirot called using “the little grey cells.” In the mid-1980s, William Petersen starred as detective Will Graham in Manhunter (Mann 1986), the first film adaptation of Thomas Harris’s novel Red Dragon (1981), which introduced the world to Dr. Hannibal “The Cannibal” Lector. The film was ahead of its time, bring- ing the criminalist and that which he hunts—the serial killer—to the big screen several years before the genre became pervasive in the mid-1990s. Today William Petersen produces and stars in one of the most popular tele- vision drama series in the world, airing in 100 countries: CSI: Crime Scene In- vestigation (Cole 3). Like Manhunter, CSI centers on the investigations of its detectives, including Gil Grissom (played by Petersen), who are criminal- ists—detectives who specialize in the analysis of physical evidence. The criminalist is a modern-day incarnation of the classical sleuth first envisioned by Edgar Allan Poe in the 1840s with C. Auguste Dupin, the hero of a handful of “tales of ratiocination,” and popularized by Sir Arthur 3 © 2006 State University of New York Press, Albany FIGURE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumumba's Ghosts
    TRANSFORMATIONS Journal of Media & Culture http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/25/02.shtml ISSN 1444-3775 Issue No. 25 2014 — New Immaterialities Lumumba’s Ghosts: Immaterial Matters and Matters Immaterial in Sven Augustijnen’s Spectres By Esther Peeren What does it mean to evoke immaterialities in the context of a surging new materialism committed to “giving special attention to matter, which has been so neglected by dualist thought” (Dolphijn and van der Tuin 85)? While matter is traditionally opposed to the mind, this is not the only form taken by the immaterial, defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as “not material, not consisting of matter, incorporeal, spiritual” and “of no essential consequence, unimportant.” In fact, much like the materiality of the body, many forms of immateriality were considered inferior and suspect within the Cartesian framework of rationality. These included emotion and superstition, along with any other experience or phenomenon not susceptible to “an empiricist epistemology and its supporting ontology of the visible and the concrete” (Radway viii). Thus, rather than entailing a return to privileging the mind, a focus on immaterialities prompts us to take seriously that which is not immediately apprehensible or is deemed inconsequential. Recovering disparaged forms of the immaterial as also mattering may even take on a political function in the form of Jacques Rancière’s “redistribution of the sensible” – as effectuating a shift in what can be sensed and is taken to make sense in a particular context. At the same time, paying attention to immaterialities can transform our understanding of matter itself, not through contrast but through a consideration of their interrelationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Lawyers in the Movies
    Nova Law Review Volume 24, Issue 2 2000 Article 3 Bad Lawyers in the Movies Michael Asimow∗ ∗ Copyright c 2000 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Asimow: Bad Lawyers in the Movies Bad Lawyers In The Movies Michael Asimow* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 533 I. THE POPULAR PERCEPTION OF LAWYERS ..................................... 536 El. DOES POPULAR LEGAL CULTURE FOLLOW OR LEAD PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT LAWYERS? ......................................................... 549 A. PopularCulture as a Followerof Public Opinion ................ 549 B. PopularCulture as a Leader of Public Opinion-The Relevant Interpretive Community .......................................... 550 C. The CultivationEffect ............................................................ 553 D. Lawyer Portrayalson Television as Compared to Movies ....556 IV. PORTRAYALS OF LAWYERS IN THE MOVIES .................................. 561 A. Methodological Issues ........................................................... 562 B. Movie lawyers: 1929-1969................................................... 569 C. Movie lawyers: the 1970s ..................................................... 576 D. Movie lawyers: 1980s and 1990s.......................................... 576 1. Lawyers as Bad People ..................................................... 578 2. Lawyers as Bad Professionals ..........................................
    [Show full text]