New Mexico State Record, 11-03-1916 State Publishing Company
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Review of Public Two-Year Institutions of Higher Education in New Mexico
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 103 033 JC 750 175 AUTHOR Esquibel, Antonio . TITLE A Review of Public Tvo-Year Institutions of Higher Education in New Mexico. INSTITUTION New Mexico Univ., Albuquerque. Dept. of Educational Administration. PUB DATE Dec 74 NOTE 75p. IDES PRICE MP-$0.76 HC -53.32 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Colleges; *Educational History; *Educational Legislation; Educational Planning; Enrollment Trends; *Junior Colleges; Literature Reviews; Post Secondary Education; *Public Education; *State of the Art Reviews IDENTIFIERS Branch Campuses; *New Mexico ABSTRACT This study vas conducted to establish *The State of the Art* of public two-year colleges in New Mexico* Previous studies of two-year institutions in New Mexico are reviewed. A historical review of two-year colleges and a legislative history of junior colleges in New Mexico are presented. Althougb Nee Mexico does not have a coordinated state system of junior colleges, enrollment in two-year institutions has increased over 200 percent during the last 10 years. New Mexico now has nine branch community college campuses, which are governed by a parent four-year college, and onlyone junior college, which is,controlled by a junior college board elected by the junior college district's voters. New Mexico also hes one military institute, three technical/vocational institutes, and five private and six public four-year institutions. In general, twoo.year colleges in New Mexico have been relegated to the status of stepchild of other institutions* Because they add prestige to the communities in which they are located, branch colleges give the parent institutions additional political clout in the state legislature; this political reality must be considered in future attempts to establish junior college legislation. -
Affidavit NM Legislature Final
To: Speaker of the House Brian Egolf State Capitol, Suite 104 490 Old Santa Fe Trail Santa Fe, NM 87501 To: President Pro Tempore Mimi Stewart 313 Moon Street NE Albuquerque, NM 87123 From: _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ Notice by Affidavit to the Legislature of New Mexico State Notice of Maladministration Notice of Malfeasance Demand to End State of Public Health Emergency Notice of Change in Contract Terms Notice of Right to Arbitration Case # 2021-0704B Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Comes now Affiant, __________________________________________, one of the people (as seen in the New Mexico Constitution Article 2 Section 2), Sui Juris, in this Court of Record, does make the following claims: Affiant claims that the United States of America is a constitutional republic and that the Constitution guarantees to every state a republican form of government. See below: republic (n.) c. 1600, "state in which supreme power rests in the people via elected representatives," from French république (15c.) Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=republic&ref=searchbar_searchhint United States Constitution Article 4 Section 4 The United States shall guarantee to every state a republican form of government... Affiant claims that the New Mexico Constitution affirms that all political power is inherent in the people, and that you, as public servant and trustee, serve at the will of the people. You do not have granted authority to control the people's private affairs or to “rule over” us. Please see constitutional provisions below: New Mexico Constitution Bill of Rights Article 2 Section 2: All political power is vested in and derived from the people: all government of right originates with the people, is founded upon their will and is instituted solely for their good. -
Edmund G. Ross As Governor of New Mexico Territory: a Reappraisal
New Mexico Historical Review Volume 36 Number 3 Article 2 7-1-1961 Edmund G. Ross as Governor of New Mexico Territory: A Reappraisal Howard R. Lamar Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Lamar, Howard R.. "Edmund G. Ross as Governor of New Mexico Territory: A Reappraisal." New Mexico Historical Review 36, 3 (1961). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol36/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. NEW MEXICO HISTORICAL REVIEW VOL. XXXVI JULY, 1961 No.3 EDMUND G. ROSS AS GOVERNOR OF NEW MEXICO TERRITORY A REAPPRAISAL By HOWARD R. LAMAR NE evening in the early spring of 1889, Edmund G. Ross O invited the Territorial Secretary of New Mexico, George W. Lane, in for a smoke by a warm fire. As they sat in the family living quarters of the Palace of the Governors and talked over the'day's events, it became obvious that the Gov- , ernor was troubled about something. Unable to keep still he left his chair and paced the floor in silence. Finally he re marked: "I had hoped to induct New Mexico into Statehood."1 In those few words Ross summed up all the frustrations he had experienced in his four tempestuous years as the chief executive of New Mexico Territory. , So briefly, or hostilely, has his career as governor been re ported-both in the press of his own time and in the standard histories of New Mexico-and so little legislation is associated with his name, that one learns with genuine surprise that he had been even an advocate of statehood. -
New Mexico Statehood and Political Inequality • the Case of Nuevomexicanos
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNM Open Journals Portal (The University of New Mexico) • New Mexico Statehood and Political Inequality • The Case of Nuevomexicanos PHILLIP B. GONZALES rior to the late 1880s, the civic and political leaders of Nuevomexica- nos generally disagreed on the question of statehood for territorial New Mexico. As one faction or another put the issue on the public agenda, Pthose who favored it joined Euroamerican (the vernacular “Anglo”) settlers who believed that statehood would accelerate the modern development of the territory to everyone’s benefit and enable the people to enjoy the political sovereignty that regular membership among the states in the Union held out. Opponents generally believed that the territory was not yet ready for statehood, and especially that it would burden the mass of poor Spanish-speaking citizens with unaffordable taxes until the territory’s economy could develop sufficiently.1 But as David Holtby’s recent book on New Mexico’s achievement of statehood indicates, Nuevomexicano spokesmen at the turn of the twentieth century clearly, if not unequivocally, supported the statehood movement. The success of the statehood proposition rested on this support. Nuevomexicanos constituted the majority of New Mexico’s population and statehood required that the population ratify the 1910 constitution. A great deal thus rode on Nuevomexicano leaders Phillip B. (Felipe) Gonzales is professor of Sociology at the University of New Mexico (UNM). At UNM he was formerly associate dean of faculty, College of Arts & Sciences; chair of Sociology; and director of the Southwest Hispanic Research Institute. -
New Mexico's Fight for Statehood, 1895-1912
New Mexico Historical Review Volume 16 Number 1 Article 5 1-1-1941 New Mexico's Fight for Statehood, 1895-1912 Marion Dargan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Dargan, Marion. "New Mexico's Fight for Statehood, 1895-1912." New Mexico Historical Review 16, 1 (). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol16/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. NEW MEXICO'S FIGHT FOR STATEHOOD (1895-1912) By MARION DARGAN IV. THE OPPOSITION WITHIN THE TERRITORY DURING THE NINETIES OME TWENTY-ODD bills to admit New Mexico to the union S were introduced into congress between December, 1891, and June, 1903. All of these were promptly referred to a committee, and most of them were never heard of again. Three bills, however, passed the house and attained the dig nity of a senate report, although the majority report on the last of these was unfavorable. During the early nineties, Antonio Joseph, delegate to congress from New Mexico, fathered most of the house bills, hoping to win statehood by the aid of his fellow democrats. After his defeat in 1894, Catron, Fergusson, Perea and Rodey followed in rapid sue- · cession. Of these, perhaps the first and the last named strove hardest to get an enabling act through congress, but all met defeat. -
New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez: Living the American Dream Jonella Frank
Sooner Lawyer Archive Volume 2011 | Issue 2 Fall 2011/Winter 2012 2011 New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez: Living the American Dream Jonella Frank Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/soonerlawyer Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Frank, Jonella (2011) "New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez: Living the American Dream," Sooner Lawyer Archive: Vol. 2011 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/soonerlawyer/vol2011/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the OU College of Law Archives at University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sooner Lawyer Archive by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez: Living the American Dream History was made when Susana Martinez (’86) was | BY JONELLA FRANK | sworn in January 1, 2011, as New Mexico’s first female governor and the country’s first Latina governor. Just weeks later, her name was being mentioned as a possible 2012 Republican vice presidential candidate. It is “humbling” to be named as a possible contender for the second-highest office in the UnitedS tates, she said, but she’s not interested in that job. She is too focused on serving New Mexico. Martinez was born July 14, 1959, in El Paso, Texas, the youngest of three children of Paula and Jacobo Martinez. She grew up there, graduating in 1977 from Riverside High School, where she served as student body president. -
The Genizaro Land Grant Settlements of New Mexico
The Genizaro Land Grant Settlements of New Mexico MOISES GONZALES HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF GENIZARO SETTLEMENTS IN NEW MEXICO As defined by Fray Angelico Chavez, genizaro was the designation given to North American Indians of mixed tribal derivation living among the Hispanic population in Spanish fashion: that is, having Spanish surnames from their masters, Christian names through baptism, speaking a simple form of Spanish, and living together or sprinkled among the Hispanic towns and ranchos.1 Beginning in the 18th century, genizaro settlements were established by the Spanish to provide defensible communities on the frontier of New Spain. The strategic planning of these new towns was vital to the ability of the Spanish to sustain a presence in New Mexico during the early 1700s due to increased attacks by nomadic tribes such as the Navajo, Ute, Comanche, Apache, and Kiowa. Due to the immense pressure on the colony caused by these attacks, the settlement policy established by Governor Tomas Velez Gachupin, and continued by his successors, was to establish genizaro settlements at the fringe of the frontier to serve as a buffer zone between the nomadic tribes and the villas (principal settlements) of Santa Cruz, Santa Fe, and Albuquerque as well as many of the Pueblo communities.2 The permanence of these communities would alter the cultural landscape of New Mexico as well as blur the lines of distinction between European Spanish and Amerindian settlements in New Mexico. From the 1740s to the 1790s, towns such as Abiquiu, Las Trampas, San Miguel del Vado, Belen, Ojo Caliente, and San Miguel de Carnué were established as genizaro buffer settlements.3 During this period, MOISES GONZALES is assistant professor in the School of Architecture and Planning at the University of New Mexico. -
In the Supreme Courtof the State of Newmexico Verified
____________________ V IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY ECONOMY, INC. Petitioner, vs. No.: THE HONORABLE SUSANA MARTINEZ, Governor of the State of New Mexico, F. DAVID MARTIN, Secretary of the New Mexico Environment Department, and SANDRA JARAMILLO, New Mexico State Records Administrator, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER R. Bruce Frederick Douglas Meiklejohn 1405 Luisa Street, Ste. 5 Santa Fe, NM 87505 “ I,li ‘H ( O[ ‘Ft [\B’o (505) 989—9022 Lfl) [email protected] [email protected] JAN 11 2011 Attorneys for Petitioner Introduction and Basis for Jurisdiction 1. This original mandamus action, filed in accordance with Rule of Appellate Procedure 12-504 NMRA, presents substantial questions of law regarding the constitutional limits of executive power and the Separation of Powers Doctrine. Petitioner seeks to prevent Respondents from circumventing the lawful process by which final administrative rules, duly filed with the State Records Center, become codified and published as enforceable law. Petitioner also seeks to prevent Respondents from encroaching on the powers of the Legislature and the appellant jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals. This Court has jurisdiction to hear this case pursuant to the New Mexico Constitution, which grants the “supreme court ... original jurisdiction in quo warranto and mandamus against all state officers, boards and commissions.” N.M. çonst. Art. VI, § 3. 2. On December 6, 2010, after presiding over an arduous two-year administrative hearing process, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board (“Board”) duly adopted a final rule pursuant to the Environmental Improvement Act (“EIA”) and the Air Quality Control Act (“AQCA”), to be codified as “Rule 20.2.100 NMAC.” On December 27, 2010, having taken every preliminary step required by statute to adopt a new rule, the Board duly filed Rule 20.2.100 NMAC with the State Records Center pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 14-4- 3(1995) of the State Rules Act. -
Cover a Rt: Greg Tucker Design: Kristina Gray Fisher Design Consultan T: Arlyn Eve Nathan Mailing Coordinato R: Frank E
FA LL 2007 A Results-Oriented Think Tank Serving New Mexicans The Secret Story Behind New Mexico’s Title Insurance Law, How it Harms Working Families, and How We Can Fix It Cover A rt: Greg Tucker Design: Kristina Gray Fisher Design Consultan t: Arlyn Eve Nathan Mailing Coordinato r: Frank E. Gonzales Pre-Press: Peter Ellzey Printe r: Starline Printing Production Manage r: Lynne Loucks Buchen Researched b y: Kristina Gray Fisher, Fred Nathan, Grant Taylor and Maclovia Quintana Written b y: Fred Nathan and Kristina Gray Fisher To receive additional copies of this or any other Think New Mexico report, please provide us with your name, address, telephone number and $10.00 per copy. Please allow two weeks for shipping and handling. Photocopying and distribution of this report without the express written permission of Think New Mexico is prohibited. Address: 1227 Paseo de Peralta Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 Telephon e: 505. 99 2.1315 Fax: 505. 99 2.1314 Emai l: info @thinknewmexico.org Web: www.thinknewmexico.org Copyright © 2007 by Think New Mexico Think® and Think New Mexico® are registered marks with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. About Think New Mexico Think New Mexico is a result s- oriented think tank serving the citizens of New Mexico. Our mission is to improve the quality of life for all New Mexicans, especially working low and middle-income families. We fulfill this mission by educating the public, the media and policymakers about some of the most serious problems facing New Mexico and by develop - ing effective, comprehensive, sustainable solutions to those problems. -
Spanish-American Villages of the Pecos River Valley
.BB^i^h%A§er:icaii Villages of "the Pecos River-Valley, HABS' Ho. 1-131 .■'/general- VieV .. Sari,Miguel County New Mexico -HMbS ^M-XnutNAi j \~ WRITTEN HISTORICAL MD DESCRIPTIVE DATA m REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 2021*0 HABS No. HM-131 (Page l) HCC\ COVER SHEET ^,, Wt. ^ The Spanish-American towns of the Pecos River Valley were established on the San Miguel del Vado Grant of 1794. Originally planned around defensible plazas, with semi-presidio status, the Colonial towns were created to serve as a buffer against the hostile incursions of the Comanche and Kiowa Indians. In 1821, William Becknell's wagon train crossed the Pecos River at San Miguel del Vado (St. Michael of the Ford) on its journey to Santa Fe from Kansas, Missouri. The route he established for those who followed, was the Santa Fe Trail. The great influx of American traders into New Mexico resulted in relative prosperity for the villages along the Pecos River. In 1841, the Texas-Santa Fe Expedition was captured at La Cuesta (Villanueva) by the forces of Governor Manuel Armijo of the Republic of Mexico. In the Mexican- Am er ican War of 1846, the Amer icans annexed the New Mexico terri- tory to the United States. General Kearny stopped in the Pecos River Valley towns and proclaimed the American occupation of New Mexico while in pursuit of the 22nd Regiment of the Mexican army. With the advent of the railroad to New Mexico in 1879, the towns which had been bypassed began to decline in importance. -
Inside of Report
FA LL 2009 A Results-Oriented Think Tank Serving New Mexicans Restoring Trust: Banning Political Contributions from Contractors and Lobbyists Cover A rt : Dan May Design: Kristina Gray Fisher Design Consultan t: Arlyn Eve Nathan Mailing Coordinato r: Frank E . Gonzales and David Casados Pre-Press: Peter Ellzey Printe r: Craftsman Printers, Inc. Production Manage r: Lynne Loucks Buchen Researched b y: Kristina Gray Fisher, Fred Nathan, Jason Espinoza, Liz Cerny-Chipman, Gregory Gonzales, Emma Hamilton, and Maclovia Quintana Written b y: Fred Nathan and Kristina Gray Fisher About the Paper in this Report : The paper used to print this report satisfies the sourcing require - ments of the sustainable forestry initiative program . To receive additional copies of this or any other Think New Mexico report, please provide us with your name, address, telephone number and $10.00 per copy. An order form is available on our website at www.thinknewmexico.org. Please allow two weeks for shipping and han - dling. Photocopying and distribution of this report without the express written permission of Think New Mexico is prohibited. A Results-Oriented Think Tank Serving New Mexicans Address: 1227 Paseo de Peralta Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 Telephon e: 505. 99 2.1315 Fax: 505. 99 2.1314 Emai l: info @thinknewmexico.org Web: www.thinknewmexico.org Copyright © 2009 by Think New Mexico Thin k® and Think New Mexico® are registered marks with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. About Think New Mexico Think New Mexico is a result s- oriented think tank serving the citizens of New Mexico. Our mission is to improve the quality of life for all New Mexicans, especially those who lack a strong voice in the political process. -
Santa Fe New Mexican, 08-12-1905 New Mexican Printing Company
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Santa Fe New Mexican, 1883-1913 New Mexico Historical Newspapers 8-12-1905 Santa Fe New Mexican, 08-12-1905 New Mexican Printing Company Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sfnm_news Recommended Citation New Mexican Printing Company. "Santa Fe New Mexican, 08-12-1905." (1905). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sfnm_news/2343 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the New Mexico Historical Newspapers at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Fe New Mexican, 1883-1913 by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SANTA NEW MEXICAN VOL. 42. SANTA FE, N. MM SATURDAY. AUGUST 12, 1905. NO. 149. IN HANDS OF BOILER MAKERS ARE DEFEATED. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOLS. The FREE TRADE PAJARITO CHRISTENED Santa Fe Wins in the Strike and Annual Report of Superintendent the Union Officials Have Conceded Shows Them to Be in Satisfactory JAPANESE Their Failure. ISfAVORED Condition. WITHWATER Topeka, Kans., Aug. 12. The ex- CLIFrJOMES The report of A. N. White, superin- ecutive officers of the union boiler tendent of public schools of Grant The Russian Reply to the Mika makers and iron shipbuilders of Amer- Members of the Taft Be Wonderful and County to the territorial superintend in ica Party Highly Interesting Battleship Kansas Launched do's Terms Was Delivered have evidently decided that the ent of public instruction and dated Au strike against the Santa Fe Railway, lieve Philippine Products Prehistoric Ruins In gust 1st, is an interesting document, Accordance With Prohibi- called last is In-- a This Morning spring, hopeless.