1 in the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION NO.22403 OF 2015 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: BOJAMMA M. U. D/O. M. B. CHINNAPPA, W/O. LATE M. K. UTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT SALIGRAMA, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI-576225. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI H. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, ADV.) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UDUPI DISTRICT, RAJATHADRI, MANIPAL, UDUPI-576201. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SALIGRAMA TOWN PANCHAYATH, SALIGRAMA, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI-576225. 3. THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES, TELECOM HOUSE ROAD, MANGALORE. 2 4. DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES 2ND FLOOR, CITY CENTRE, OPP: TO HOTEL ROOPA, BALMATTA ROAD, MANGALURU-575001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY MS. KAVITHA H. C., H.C.G.P. FOR R-1, 3 & 4; MR. PRASAD HEGDE, ADV. FOR R-2) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION DATED 14-5-2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR FURTHER ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R By order dated 8-8-2016, this Court had granted time to the Tahsildar, Brahmavar, to take the keys of the old godown from the petitioner, Smt. Bojamma M.U. By order dated 19-9-2016, this Court had observed that the mahazar, taking over the keys, has not been submitted by the Tahsildar before this Court. 2. The learned counsel for the State has submitted a memo along with the mahazar (receipt) clearly indicating that the Special Tahsildar, Brahmavar, Udupi District, has 3 received the possession of 0.29 guntas of land in survey No.30/12, and godown thereon, along with the well, and the compound. Thus, the petitioner has handed over the possession of her earlier godown and of the land to the Tahsildar. 3. Due to the efforts made by the learned counsel for the parties, since the dispute is already settled outside the Court, as recorded by this Court in order dated 8-8-2016, no further order needs to be passed by this Court. 4. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of . Since the petition stands disposed of, I.A. Nos.1 of 2015, 2 of 2015 and 1 of 2016 do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, I.A. Nos.1 of 2015, 2 of 2015 and 1 of 2016 also stand dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE kvk .