DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ROMAN ARMY's EMERGENCE from ITS ITALIAN ORIGINS Patrick Alan Kent a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Universit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ROMAN ARMY's EMERGENCE from ITS ITALIAN ORIGINS Patrick Alan Kent a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Universit THE ROMAN ARMY’S EMERGENCE FROM ITS ITALIAN ORIGINS Patrick Alan Kent A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2012 Approved by: Richard Talbert Nathan Rosenstein Daniel Gargola Fred Naiden Wayne Lee ABSTRACT PATRICK ALAN KENT: The Roman Army’s Emergence from its Italian Origins (Under the direction of Prof. Richard Talbert) Roman armies in the 4 th century and earlier resembled other Italian armies of the day. By using what limited sources are available concerning early Italian warfare, it is possible to reinterpret the history of the Republic through the changing relationship of the Romans and their Italian allies. An important aspect of early Italian warfare was military cooperation, facilitated by overlapping bonds of formal and informal relationships between communities and individuals. However, there was little in the way of organized allied contingents. Over the 3 rd century and culminating in the Second Punic War, the Romans organized their Italian allies into large conglomerate units that were placed under Roman officers. At the same time, the Romans generally took more direct control of the military resources of their allies as idea of military obligation developed. The integration and subordination of the Italians under increasing Roman domination fundamentally altered their relationships. In the 2 nd century the result was a growing feeling of discontent among the Italians with their position. Indeed, the vital military role of the Italians was reinforced by the somewhat limited use made of non-Italians in Roman armies. By the late 2 nd century, the Italians were vestiges of past traditions that no longer fitted into a changing world. Feelings of discontent grew stronger and, eventually, led to widespread revolt in the Social War. As the Romans became masters of vast empire, they became increasingly divorced from their Italian origins and subjugated their once allies. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . v INTRODUCTION. 1 Chapter I. WARFARE IN EARLY ITALY. 17 Warfare and Military Cooperation . 17 Allies, Mercenaries, and Communities. 25 An Italian Army on Campaign . 36 II. FORMAL AND INFORMAL INTERACTIONS. 51 The Instability of Community Relations. 51 Formal and Informal Relationships. 56 Military Implications. 77 III. THE INTEGRATION OF ROME’S ITALIAN ALLIES . 84 The 3 rd Century to 216 . 84 Military Crisis: The Battle of Cannae . 97 After Cannae . 100 IV. MILITARY OBLIGATION. 121 Anachronistic Obligations of the Latins and Hernici . 122 Polybius’ Catalogue in 225. 127 Foedera , Formulae , and Military Obligations . 131 iii Recruitment and Discharge of Allies in the 2 nd Century . 146 V. IMPERIAL ARMIES OF THE REPUBLIC . 152 Early Use of Non-Italians in Roman Armies. 153 The Effects of Empire on Rome . 157 Non-Italians in Roman Armies . 161 Roman Armies from the Second Punic War to the Social War . 170 Italians vs. Non-Italians in Roman Armies. 174 VI. VESTIGES OF THE PAST . 180 Political Subordination of Italy . 180 Romanization and Military Service. 185 Italy vs. the Provinces . 189 Buildup and Outbreak of the Social War . 195 CONCLUSION. 207 APPENDICES I. List of Latin Colonies in the Revolt of 209. 212 II. List of Prefects and Allied Commanders . 214 III. The Socii Navales . 223 IV. List of Non-Italians in Roman Armies beyond their Homelands. 229 REFERENCES. 234 iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CIL Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum . FC Degrassi, A. Fasti Capitolini . Turin: G.B. Paravia & Co., 1954. MRR Broughton, T.R.S. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic . Vols. 1 and 2. New York: American Philological Association, 1951-1952. v Introduction This dissertation argues that the Roman army of the 4 th century 1 and prior was little different from other Italian armies of the day. The accepted scholarly view of the Roman army’s exploitation of Italian allies, which is ultimately based on an anachronistic application of Polybius’ rationalized model, is in need of revision. The sophisticated use of allied manpower in the 2 nd century, which facilitated the creation of Rome’s Mediterranean empire, was quite divergent from earlier practices. Italy, in the 4 th century, was still a peninsula filled with communities that were in a constant state of competition and cooperation. The personal relationships of individuals, which transcended community boundaries, facilitated a close interconnectedness in the Italian world and, combined with formal relationships, facilitated military cooperation. An examination of the later ancient sources, such as Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, reveals that military cooperation was not a unique Roman attribute, but was a feature of a larger tradition of Italian warfare that included Rome. It was the conquest of Italy in the early 3 rd century and the military pressures of the first two Punic Wars (264-241, 218-201) that began a process which would propel the Roman army away from its Italian roots. 1 All dates are BC unless otherwise noted. Traditional means of military cooperation then broke down as the other communities of Italy were subsumed within a new Roman military system. The role of personal relationships was replaced with the idea that formal alliances between the Romans and their allies obligated military assistance whenever Roman generals required it. Similar changes were taking place in the political organization of the Republic, as the Senate undertook closer supervision over annual magistrates, and regions beyond Italy were transformed into subordinate provinces. The peoples of Italy were placed in a position of increasing subordination inconsistent with their military importance; it was this shift that ultimately led to civil war in the early 1 st century. Investigation into the development of a Roman army from the military traditions of early Italy reveals how the Romans with the aid of the other peoples of Italy succeeded in winning an empire and were transformed in the process. 1. Treaties and Military Cooperation in Modern Scholarship Scholars’ interpretation of the military relations of the Romans and Italians has centered on theorizing about the nature of the foedera (treaties) that linked them together. It is a given fact that the Romans’ success relied a great deal on their use of the military resources of their Italian allies. While the interpretations have changed over time, the focus of modern scholarly investigation has remained firmly on these legal relationships. According to the 2007 Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare , “as Rome expanded and conquered new territories, the places that were absorbed were with a few exceptions left free to govern their own affairs . their only obligation was to contribute troops.” 2 In fact, the characterization of this obligation has remained remarkably constant 2 J. Serrati, “Warfare and the State,” in P. Sabin, et al., eds. Greece, the Hellenistic World and the Rise of Rome , vol. 1 of The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare (Cambridge: 2007), 485. 2 ever since the 19 th century. The Romans are seen as systematically demanding the military resources of their allies. The mechanism for this exploitation was the establishment of treaties that dictated military obligation on the part of Rome’s allies. However, with this focus on formal treaties, the importance of informal relationships in the military interactions of the peoples of Italy has been ignored by and large, making it difficult to gain a full understanding of the combined role of formal and informal relationships. Interpretation of the military relationships of the Romans and their allies comes from the work of historians in the late 19 th century. In 1881 Mommsen asserted that “without a doubt the non-Latin allied communities . were registered on the list of contingent- furnishing Italians ( formula togatorum ).” 3 The Romans thus controlled the military resources of their allies to supplement their own armies. Mommsen’s interpretation saw Rome’s allies as subsumed within a Roman state ( reichsangehörig ), which increasingly took on a national character during the conquest of Italy. 4 As a result of the incorporation of the peoples of Italy, the Romans gained full control over their military resources. The tool for doing so was the foedus .5 Beloch (1880) likewise saw foedera as the key institution in Roman and Italian military cooperation within a confederate system. 6 Many of the controversies of the military obligations of Rome’s allies come from these two authors, who emphasized the importance of treaties in facilitating Roman use of allied manpower. Various scholars have expanded on these ideas, emphasizing the role of treaties (foedera ) in the military obligations of Rome’s allies. Täubler (1913) refined Beloch’s 3 “ohne Zweifel auch die nichtlatinischen föderierten Gemeinden. in das Verzeichnis der zuzugpflichtigen Italiker (formula togatorum) eingetragen,” T. Mommsen, Römische Geschichte (Berlin: 1881), 1:423. 4 T. Mommsen, Römische Staatsrecht (Leipzig: 1887), 3:653. 5 Mommsen (1887), 3:672-676. 6 K. J. Beloch, Der italische Bund unter Roms Hegemonie (Leipzig: 1880), 194-227. 3 interpretation of foedera into the concepts of equal ( aequum ) and unequal ( iniquum ) varieties. 7 Central to the foedus iniquum was the so-called maiestas clause requiring allies to support the ascendancy of Rome, which Sherwin-White (1973) saw as the clause that allowed the Romans to exploit their allies for aggressive wars. 8 Here Sherwin-White touches on a fundamental problem: how did the Romans obtain allied assistance in aggressive wars? Certainly, the foedus Cassianum , the only surviving example of an Italian treaty, makes no pronouncements on this specific possibility. 9 The foedus iniquum solved the problem by supposing that the Romans created unequal alliances designed to exploit allied manpower in any military situation. Those allies with foedera aequa were required to help in defensive wars, but retained the right to participate in any aggressive actions of their own choosing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prog Salvaguardia E Tutela Del Parco Aurunci
    PROGETTO SALVAGUARDIA E TUTELA DEL PARCO DEI MONTI AURUNCI e PARCO DEI MONTI AUSONI E LAGO DI FONDI ALLEGATO 3A - Scheda progetto per l’impiego di operatori volontari in servizio civile in Italia ENTE 1) Denominazione e codice SU dell’ente titolare di iscrizione all’albo SCU proponente il progetto (*) PARCO DEI MONTI AURUNCI SU00204 2) Denominazione e codice SU di eventuali enti di accoglienza dell’ente proponente il progetto ……………………………………… 3) Eventuali enti coprogettanti 3.a) denominazione e codice SU degli enti di accoglienza dell’ente titolare di iscrizione all’albo SCU proponente il progetto ……………………………………………… 3.b) denominazione e codice SU degli enti titolari di iscrizione all’albo SCU ed eventuali propri enti di accoglienza PARCO NATURALE REGIONALE MONTI AUSONI E LAGO DI FONDI - SU00347 Numero N. Sede di attuazione Comune Codice sede Nominativo Olp volontari PARCO AURUNCI Sede centrale Domenico Sepe Uff. serv. CAMPODIMELE 1 171032 2 Marzella Antonio Vigilanza e comunicazione PARCO AURUNCI CAMPODIMELE 2 Sede centrale Domenico Sepe Uff.promozione 171030 1 Tedeschi Antonio PARCO AURUNCI 3 ITRI 171043 2 Ialongo Giampaolo Vivaio del Parco Uff. patrimonio ambientale PARCO AURUNCI Soscia Fulvio 4 ITRI 171041 2 Vivaio del Parco Centro visitatori parco Antonio PARCO AURUNCI Monumento Naturale Settecannelle Mola della 5 FONDI 171019 2 Izzi Fabrizio Corte Uff. educaz. Ambientale PARCO AURUNCI Centro studi De Santis Ufficio promozione- FORMIA 6 171015 2 Buttaro Raffaele archivio dei Monti Aurunci PARCO AURUNCI SPIGNO 7 171020 4 Tarantino Marco Museo Naturalistico SATURNIA PARCO AURUNCI Palazzo Spinelli-Museo del Carsismo(percorso ESPERIA 8 171022 6 Perrella Paolo grotta carsica) 2 PARCO AURUNCI Monticelli Esperia-Uff.
    [Show full text]
  • Umbria from the Iron Age to the Augustan Era
    UMBRIA FROM THE IRON AGE TO THE AUGUSTAN ERA PhD Guy Jolyon Bradley University College London BieC ILONOIK.] ProQuest Number: 10055445 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10055445 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract This thesis compares Umbria before and after the Roman conquest in order to assess the impact of the imposition of Roman control over this area of central Italy. There are four sections specifically on Umbria and two more general chapters of introduction and conclusion. The introductory chapter examines the most important issues for the history of the Italian regions in this period and the extent to which they are relevant to Umbria, given the type of evidence that survives. The chapter focuses on the concept of state formation, and the information about it provided by evidence for urbanisation, coinage, and the creation of treaties. The second chapter looks at the archaeological and other available evidence for the history of Umbria before the Roman conquest, and maps the beginnings of the formation of the state through the growth in social complexity, urbanisation and the emergence of cult places.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Age and Roman Italy
    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, page 336-357 16 Iron Age and Roman Italy Zena Kamash, Lucy Shipley, Yannis Galanakis and Stella Skaltsa 16.1 Introduction The Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) holds c. 346 artefacts from Italy that are recorded as Iron Age or Roman in date. A further c. 302 artefacts are listed as ‘Roman’, but with no country of provenance. This chapter therefore presents a characterization of c. 648 artefacts, complementing the discussions of Iron Age and Roman material in the chapters on Egypt (Chapter 7), Europe (Chapter 11), the Aegean and Cyprus (Chapter 15), the Levant (Chapter 22) and South-West Asia (Chapter 23). After setting this collection in its geographic and temporal context (16.2), this chapter presents an overview of the collectors represented by the Iron Age and Roman Italian collections (16.3), with reference to the PRM founding collection (16.3.1), and the material collected by John Wickham Flower (16.3.2), Henry Balfour (16.3.3), Robert William Theodore Gunther (16.3.4), Anthony John Arkell (16.3.5), Walter Leo Hildburgh (16.3.6), and other collectors (16.3.7). The collections from Iron Age Italy are considered in section 16.4 by Lucy Shipley, Yannis Galanakis and Stella Skaltsa, with reference to the Etruscan collections (16.4.1) and the other Iron Age material from Italy (16.4.2). Collections from Roman Italy and unprovenanced Roman objects are considered by Zena Kamash in section 16.5, and brief conclusions are drawn in section 16.6.
    [Show full text]
  • By Agabus Bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)
    Predation on Italian newt larva, Lissotriton italicus (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae), by Agabus bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) LUIGI CORSETTI1 and GIANLUCA NARDI2 1 Via Adige, 45. I-04100 Latina, Italy. 2 Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale - Corpo Forestale dello Stato. Strada Mantova, 29. I-46045 Marmirolo (MN), Italy. 2 Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT — Predation of a larva of Lissotriton italicus by adults of a diving beetle (Agabus bipustulatus) on the Aurunci Mountains (central Italy, Latium region) is recorded. This is the first identified invertebrate predator of this Italian endemic newt. The possible role of this beetle in the local demographic control of the newt is briefly discussed. HE Italian Newt, Lissotriton italicus (Peracca), (Latina province, Castelforte, Monte Siola W-SW Tpreviously referred to the genus Triturus slope, 240 m a.s.l). No other amphibians occurred (Rafinesque), is endemic to central and southern in the pond, which was probably feebly trickle fed Italy. The northern most limits of its distribution by a very small spring. In this pond about 15 adults include an oblique area extended from the Ancona of a predaceous diving beetle, Agabus bipustulatus province (Marches region) South to Lepini (Linnaeus) (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) were Mountains (Latium region, Rome province), on observed attacking a larva of the Italian Newt. The the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian sides of the Apennines, larva was initially attacked by a single beetle that respectively (Corsetti et al., 2005; Balletto, 2006; was quickly followed by the others and was Scillitani et al., 2006; Scillitani & Tripepi, 2007). devoured, almost completely, in about 10-15 It is a euryoecious species living in a wide range seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • 75 AD FABIUS 270-203 BC Plutarch Translated
    75 AD FABIUS 270-203 B.C. Plutarch translated by John Dryden Plutarch (46-120) - Greek biographer, historian, and philosopher, sometimes known as the encyclopaedist of antiquity. He is most renowned for his series of character studies, arranged mostly in pairs, known as “Plutarch’s Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans” or “Parallel Lives.” Fabius (75 AD) - A study of the life of Fabius, a Roman consul. FABIUS HAVING related the memorable actions of Pericles, our history now proceeds to the life of Fabius. A son of Hercules and a nymph, of some woman of that country, who brought him forth on the banks of Tiber, was, it is said, the first Fabius, the founder of the numerous and distinguished family of the name. Others will have it that they were first called Fodii, because the first of the race delighted in digging pitfalls for wild beasts, fodere being still the Latin for to dig, and fossa for a ditch, and that in process of time, by the change of the two letters, they grew to be called Fabii. But be these things true or false, certain it is that this family for a long time yielded a great number of eminent persons. Our Fabius, who was fourth in descent from that Fabius Rullus who first brought the honourable surname of Maximus into his family, was also, by way of personal nickname, called Verrucosus, from a wart on his upper lip; and in his childhood they in like manner named him Ovicula, or The Lamb, on account of his extreme mildness of temper.
    [Show full text]
  • Romano-Italic Relations and the Origins of the Social War
    Managing Empire: Romano-Italic Relations and the Origins of the Social War by Owen James Stewart, BA (Hons) School of Humanities Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February, 2019 STATEMENTS AND DECLARATIONS Declaration of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Owen James Stewart Date: 18/02/2019 Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Owen James Stewart Date: 18/02/2019 Statement Regarding Published Work Contained in Thesis The publisher of the paper comprising the majority of Chapter 1.4 (pages 29 to 42) hold the copyright for that content and access to the material should be sought from the respective journal. The remaining non-published content of the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Owen James Stewart Date: 18/02/2019 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all those who served as my supervisor throughout this project: Geoff Adams, with whom it all began, for his enthusiasm and encouragement; Jonathan Wallis for substituting while other arrangements were being made; and Jayne Knight for her invaluable guidance that made submission possible.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANS F/ 52 PART L: the KINGS of ROME
    ruuLAE rcWAE STORIES OF FAMOLJS ROMANS f/ 52 PART l: THE KINGS OF ROME 1 iam dEdum: "for a long time already.' 2 aegrl ferre, to take badly, resent. Sex. Tarquinil: the youngest son ofTarquinius Superbus; see 11:17 and the note there" 3 ut . , . statuerent: "that they decided," result clause (see the grammar note on page 56). 5 Tarquinius CollEtlnus, -I (m.), Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus (nephew of Tarquinius Superbus and husband oflucretia). sorOre . n6tus: "born from the sister," ablative ofsourcewith nEtus, perfect participle ofthe verb n6scor. 6 contubernium, -i (n.), the sharing of a tent in the army, the status of be- ing messmates. in contuberrrid iuvenum rEgi0rum . erat: "was a messmate of . ." Ardea, -ae (f), Ardea (a town to the south of Rome). 7 *hber, libera, hberum, free, outspoken, unrestricted, unrestrained. frnusquisque, tnaquaeque, tnumquodque, each one. 8 *nutue, -ts (f), daughter-in-1aw. 9 *ltxus, -0.s (m.), luxury, luxurious living, extravagance. *d6prehend6, d6prehendere (3), dEprehendl, d6preh6nsum, to get hold of, surprise, catch in the act. CollEtia, -ae (f), Collatia (a town in Latium). 10 LucrEtia, -ae (f), Lucretia (wife of Collatinus). lanificium, -I (n.), wool-spinning, weaving (a traditional occupation of a Roman housewife). L1 offendO, offendere (3), offeadi, oftnsum, to strike against, find, en- counf,er. pudlcus, -a, -lrm, chase, virtuous. *itrdicd (1), to judge, proclaim, declare, think. 12 *corrump6, corrumpere (3), corrtrpl, corruptum, to break, corrupt, seduce, Ad quan corrumpendam: "To seduce her," gerundive (see the grammar note on page 59). 13 propinquitds, propinquitdtig (f), family relationship. Sextus Tarquinius was admitted to the house because he was a rela- tive.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Hellenistic Rural Settlement and the City of Thurii, the Survey Evidence (Sibaritide, Southern Italy) A
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen Hellenistic Rural Settlement and the City of Thurii, the survey evidence (Sibaritide, southern Italy) Attema, Peter; Oome, Neeltje Published in: Palaeohistoria DOI: 10.21827/5beab05419ccd IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2018 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Attema, P., & Oome, N. (2018). Hellenistic Rural Settlement and the City of Thurii, the survey evidence (Sibaritide, southern Italy). Palaeohistoria, 59/60, 135-166. https://doi.org/10.21827/5beab05419ccd Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 13-11-2019 PALAEOHISTORIA ACTA ET COMMUNICATIONES INSTITUTI ARCHAEOLOGICI UNIVERSITATIS GRONINGANAE 59/60 (2017/2018) University of Groningen / Groningen Institute of Archaeology & Barkhuis Groningen 2018 Editorial staff P.A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeometric Study of Roman Pottery from Caudium Area (Southern Italy)
    De Bonis_periodico 06/09/10 10.51 Pagina 73 Period. Mineral. (2010), 79, 2, 73-89 doi: 10.2451/2010PM0011 http://go.to/permin An International Journal of PerIodICo di MInerAlogIA MINERALOGY, CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, GEOCHEMISTRY, established in 1930 ORE DEPOSITS, PETROLOGY, VOLCANOLOGY and applied topics on Environment , Archeometry and Cultural Heritage Archaeometric study of roman pottery from Caudium area (Southern Italy) Alberto De bonis 1 *, C elestino GrifA 2, A lessio lAnGellA 2, M AriAno MerCurio 2, M AriA luisA Perrone 3 and VinCenzo MorrA 1 1 Dipartimento di scienze della terra, università degli studi federico ii, Via Mezzocannone, 8, 80134 napoli, italy. 2 Dipartimento di studi Geologici ed Ambientali, università degli studi del sannio, Via dei Mulini, 59/A, 82100 benevento, italy. 3 Via r. Morghen, 61/C, 80129, napoli, italy. Submitted, April 2010 - Accepted, July 2010 AbstrACt - Aim of this work is the minero- quartzarenite clasts. Multivariate statistical analysis petrographical characterization of late antique painted (Hierarchical Clustering and Principal Component common wares from the ancient roman settlement of Analysis) confirms the already identified groups. Caudium (today Montesarchio, Campania region, Mineralogical analyses and scanning electron italy). microscope observations of the sintering degree of twenty-two samples (4 th to 6 th century AD) clayey paste enabled to evaluate the firing collected during the archaeological survey of the area, temperatures of the most representative samples (from were studied to investigate their manufacturing 800 to 1200°C). technology and to attest a possible local production. the whole data set, along with geological features Ceramics shards are represented by 16 painted of the investigated area (wide availability of raw common ware samples; furthermore, 2 bricks, 2 kiln materials) and archaeological evidences (kiln refuses, rejects and 2 fragments of cooking ware were large number of fragments of the same ceramic class), investigated for comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Horatius at the Bridge” by Thomas Babington Macauley
    A Charlotte Mason Plenary Guide - Resource for Plutarch’s Life of Publicola Publius Horatius Cocles was an officer in the Roman Army who famously defended the only bridge into Rome against an attack by Lars Porsena and King Tarquin, as recounted in Plutarch’s Life of Publicola. There is a very famous poem about this event called “Horatius at the Bridge” by Thomas Babington Macauley. It was published in Macauley’s book Lays of Ancient Rome in 1842. HORATIUS AT THE BRIDGE By Thomas Babington Macauley I LARS Porsena of Clusium By the Nine Gods he swore That the great house of Tarquin Should suffer wrong no more. By the Nine Gods he swore it, And named a trysting day, And bade his messengers ride forth, East and west and south and north, To summon his array. II East and west and south and north The messengers ride fast, And tower and town and cottage Have heard the trumpet’s blast. Shame on the false Etruscan Who lingers in his home, When Porsena of Clusium Is on the march for Rome. III The horsemen and the footmen Are pouring in amain From many a stately market-place; From many a fruitful plain; From many a lonely hamlet, Which, hid by beech and pine, 1 www.cmplenary.com A Charlotte Mason Plenary Guide - Resource for Plutarch’s Life of Publicola Like an eagle’s nest, hangs on the crest Of purple Apennine; IV From lordly Volaterae, Where scowls the far-famed hold Piled by the hands of giants For godlike kings of old; From seagirt Populonia, Whose sentinels descry Sardinia’s snowy mountain-tops Fringing the southern sky; V From the proud mart of Pisae, Queen of the western waves, Where ride Massilia’s triremes Heavy with fair-haired slaves; From where sweet Clanis wanders Through corn and vines and flowers; From where Cortona lifts to heaven Her diadem of towers.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Influence of Art: the Effect of the Statues of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia on Valerius
    Under the Influence of Art: The Effect of the Statues of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia on Valerius Maximus’ Facta et Dicta Memorabilia In his work, Facta et Dicta Memorabilia, Valerius Maximus stated in the praefatio of his chapter “De Fortitudine” that he will discuss the great deeds of Romulus, but cannot do so without bringing up one example first; someone whose similarly great deeds helped save Rome (3.2.1-2). This great man is Horatius Cocles. Valerius Maximus noted that he must next talk about another hero, Cloelia, after Horatius Cocles because they fight the same enemy, at the same time, at the same place, and both perform facta memorabilia to save Rome (3.2.2-3). Valerius Maximus mentioned Horatius Cocles and Cloelia together, as if they are a joined pair that cannot be separated. Yet there is another legendary figure, Mucius Scaevola, who also fights the same enemy, at the same time, and also performs facta memorabilia to save Rome. It is strange both that Valerius Maximus seemed compelled to unite Cloelia with the mention of Horatius Cocles, and also that he did not include Mucius Scaevola. Instead, Scaevola’s story is at the beginning of the next chapter (3.3.1). Traditionally these three heroes, Horatius Cocles, Cloelia, and Mucius Scaevola, were mentioned together by historians such as Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, whose works predate Valerius Maximus’ (Ab Urbe Condita 2.10-13, Roman Antiquities 5.23-35). Valerius Maximus was able to split up the triad, despite the tradition, without receiving flack because it had already been done by Virgil in the Aeneid, where he described the dual images of Cocles and Cloelia on Aeneas’ shield, but Scaevola is absent (8.646-651).
    [Show full text]