Representations of Biomedicine, Medical Research and Bioethics In

CEU eTD Collection

REPRESENTATIONS OFREPRESENTATIONS B In partial fulfillmentIn partial the for degreeMasterinGender ofArts Studies. of BIOETHICS INMEDICALBIOETHICS Supervisor: Professor Department Gender Studies of Central EuropeanCentral University Budapest, Hungary IOMEDICINE, MEDICAL IOMEDICINE, MEDICAL Eszter Nádasi Submitted to 2014 By

Allaine Cerwonka Allaine

DRAMA

RESEARCH ANDRESEARCH

CEU eTD Collection content, medical series’ the of perception audience’s the on elaborated I sources media using c non and official as well asepisodes, called provide platformsfurther discussions. for and issues, presented the about think to audience the invite and posthumanism about debates dramas Medical challenges. and issues posthumanist represent thesis This culture. examines agenre arguescalledmedicaland series serie drama thatthese popular of field the in presented are above described issues the how medical of advances the about informed be tech to have people that argue I thus impacts, social and individual have and concerns bioethical raise technologies These embodiment. prosthetizatio t because instance for fields, scholarly the within anxieties and excitement, the that presents and machines and robotizat and hybridity and debates the controversies describe aroundnew stage the calledposthumanity. I technologies, medical modern of innovation and application exist into come embodiment of form new the and transition the that claim which theories those on body.focusingBy human the oftransformation the aboutdiscourses cultural overage I found important information about the agendas and motivations of the creators. By By creators. the of motivations and theagendas about information important found Ioverage nologies. rys Anatomy Grey’s h thesi The examine to necessary is it communication scientific of ways traditional the Beyond the like embodiment, posthuman of theories several introduces part review The popular and scholarly the in circulate that approaches certain explains thesis This n, assistive reproduction and genetic research change general ideas about human about ideas general change research genetic and reproductionassistive n,

s builds on the content analysis of two popular American television series series television American popular two of analysis content the on builds s ion of the human body, boundary crossings between human, animal, human, between crossings boundary body, human the of ion

and E.R.

The critical review of the content is supported by the the by supported is content the of review critical The - official recaps. By examining the medical dramas’ media media dramas’ medical the examining By recaps. official A BSTRACT rcs o pshmnzto etis ambiguities, entails posthumanization of process

r ueu sucs n the in sources useful are s have thepotentials have to ransplantation, ence by the the by ence CEU eTD Collection arelimits and potentials genre’s the about discussions and studies perception more therefore, audience, the misleading of risk the contain series the that argue I important, is role informatory the audience’s the on the characters, the builds with engagement activity This content. dramatic the through these mediate also but embodiment human challenge that issues medical explain only not series these shows, po of question the in sources infotainment than more are dramas Medical practices. medical certain of evaluation and perception its guide to it. toward body the of transformation the about issues specific some understand orderto between posthumanism. andcultural scholarly popular on debates it and posthumanism, of possibility the represent dramas the for and field analysis the content establish Studies Technology and Science and Gender Culture, Media, Posthuman of review The effects. life real and potential, infotainment The way how posthumanist discussions are enacted in medical dramas is important in important is dramas medical in enacted are discussions posthumanist how way The needed. The public relies on popular culture’s fictional genre in order to get information and and getinformation orderto genrein culture’sfictionalpopularrelies on public The

describe why it is important to elaborate on the ways how medical medical how ways the on elaborate to important is it why describe presented life stories, and professional dilemmas. While dilemmas. professional and stories, life presented II

sthumanity: as the result of my examination examination my of result the as sthumanity: s h bss f h comparison the of basis the is

ist thinkers, Scholars of of Scholars thinkers, ist

and the feelings the and CEU eTD Collection BIBLIOGRAPHY CONCLUSION CONTENTANALYSIS MEDICAL DRAMAS THEORIZING POSTHUMAN EMBODIMENT INTRODUCTION 2.2. 2.1. 1.3. 1.2. 1.1. 4.5. 4.4. 4.3. 4.2. 4.1. 3.5. 3.4. 3.3. 3.2. 3.1. 2.5. 2.4. 2.3. 4.1.2. 4.1.1. Transplantation 3.1.2. E.R. 3.1.1. Grey’s Anatomy

P Real life effects Medical dramasinfotainment as General Introduction of Medical Dramas General introduction theof selected Potential harms and consequences Emerg Transhumanism PosthumanThe Embodiment Theorizing posthumanity Significance Structure Methods Additions Backgrounds of the research projects Predictableand controllable future Robotization of the body posthumanThe ashybrid a entity

Three ortrayal ofpractitioners the

......

...... ing Biomedical Technologies - dimensional organ printing

......

...... TABLE OFTABLE CONTENTS ......

......

...... series

...... III

......

67 63 59 55 54 48 46 43 43 41 36 35 30 28 27 26 26 25 21 16 14 12

8 8 6 5 4 1

CEU eTD Collection about conscious more become might people information, this By body. human the of future discove preliminary make to closer getting are we sense this in factors: becomes structure inner its thus risks related health certain detect to helps view inside this body:furthermore, detectable; effectively human the in view inside an provides research Genetic today. natural as considered are that practices those to connected less be will beings human of reproduction the and clear; less becomes species and beings human other human, cha body the of construction the practices, mentioned above the of result the as that see we practices and terms medical in future the about think we If future. posthuman a suggest also reproduction research Genetic machine. bodies. human and animal Prosthetics whichenhance humancapacitiesbetween anddistinction are increasing human the between boundary the challenge humans for organs animal medi instance, For biotechnological improvements. certain of result the as blurred are animal and machine human, between and of sorts all raise and beings challenging ethicalregulatory issues. and human as ourselves of ideas our challenge that questions capacit human medical the contemporary and life human of of boundaries the about questions important practices raises which biotechnology, certain to connected are that embodiment

nrdc rdcl da lk ta pol ae eoig otuas s h differences the as posthumans becoming are people that like ideas radical introduce y limits of the body. the of limits y The process of biomedicalization impli biomedicalization of process The posthumanist of understandings and approaches different examines thesis This nges and becomes more mechanized and medicalized; the boundaries between between boundaries the medicalized; and mechanized more becomes and nges coig n ohr ehooia cags n h fed of field the in changes technological other and cloning , The medical field is a significant arena for introducing complex complex introducing for arena significant a is field medical The INTRODUCTION cal transplants that graft animal tissue or otherwise use use otherwise or tissue animal graft that transplants cal CHAPTER ONE

s opiae tia ise, oiia stakes political issues, ethical complicated es

ries about the medical the about ries CEU eTD Collection ab people informs it and potential infotainment significant has genre the because entertainment, mere than more are series these that argue I and culture popular are at tolook these questio important forms culture popular of genres different and well, as culture popular of field the in circulating are artifacts such inspire that concepts and ideas the that notice, to important is it popular, more ar high in medicine of representations While science. of understanding public enhance to ways alternative are there communication scientific traditional Beyond citizens. as of sense make must they that medicine and technology science, in developments signif the of many of accounts specialist read to training or inclination the have not do people most forums, media sophisticated or reports journals, medical reading by challenges how consider to necessary is is it therefore it and development laypeople medical about For informed well democracy. be of to important issue important morally a just not is improvements people’ on impact theoretical andexplanation critique the for ofthese frame developments. medical more Tw Chapter in detail in questions stressing these on elaborate I human. very be to their means rethink it what to of as definition well as questions bioethical subtle of sense make to challenged way many the of some are these side and harms potential the about conscious be to inevitable is it but innovations, the of premises the only are these course, Of developments. function certain moreover has, body human the that capacities better or similar gain to possible it makes Technology practices. health preventive Since biotechnological developments have significant political, social and economic and social political, significant have developments biotechnological Since In this thesis I focus on medical drama television series that is a specific genre within within genre specific a is that series television drama medical on focus I thesis this In

people are informed today. While some people understand and navigate these these navigate and understand people some While today. informed are people s everyday life and future, the public understanding of these medical medical these of understanding public the future, and life everyday s o by focusing on the concept of posthumanism that provides an effective an provides that posthumanism of concept the on focusing by o s and examples of how citizens in advanced societies are are societies advanced in citizens how of examples and s ns. 2

- effects of such improvements. Moreover, Moreover, improvements. such of effects s of it becomes replaceable with medical with replaceable becomes it of s u boeiie and biomedicine out t become more and and more become t

icant icant CEU eTD Collection Iseries, tocompare decided themedical narrativ in presented were issues these of many Since biotechnology. medical of improvements last the portrayal cases represented the of many individ significant on have that practices medical reflect emerging portrays show The explicitly instance. for future claims controllable and which embodiment about concepts technologies, posthumanist medical medici of modern face of the and improvement human of meaning the change to want them of some research: medical their of aims the about statements important two made bioethics. re medical contemporary biotechnology, human medical of issues and questions challenging the represent dramas these how to attention little been has there patients, and doctors between communication and situations emergency doctors, portray dramas how medical examined scholars While animal. and the machine human, concerning the issues between border and unstable debates bioethical contemporary many analyzing and about learning for forum a provide and care; health and medicine about question contemporary press discuss and consider to audience the invite series These art. contemporary or high of artifacts and journals scientific than biomedicine modern of explanation understandable the cultural industries. of entertainingproducts than more areseries these reinforcethat that articles and studies more introduces Three Chapter technologies. and issues medical contemporary about awareness Solange and public’ the shape shows dramas these presents, study Foundation Davin’s Kaiser’s prestigious the of studies case the instance for Ascommunication. scientificof formalternative activity an this is and developments,medical Many pr Many The selection of the series rest on a fact that practitioners of practitioners that fact a on rest series the of selection The

oducts of the genre have wide audience for whom these series provide a more more a provide series these whom for audience wide have genre the of oducts

E.R. E.R. 3

es ofcertaines whereispossible. it practices the iconic and enormously popular medical medical popular enormously and iconic the s understanding of medicine and raise raise and medicine of understanding s e y h apiain and application the by ne a ad oil fet and effects social and ual Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s search, and and search,

recently

ing ing

CEU eTD Collection scholars includes thesis the Nayar K. Pramod and Wolfe Cary Herbrechter, Stephan Hayles, N. posthumanist Katherine like scholars Beyond developments. medical of improvements the of because emerging chapter first The well. as society wider the in and circles scientific within anxiety and excitement entails posthumanism of age forthcoming the of idea The posthumanism. of representations and debates cultural popular basement a providing by analysis the supports review This Studies. Technology and Science and Studies, Media Studies, Gender posthumanism, on scholarship as such science of fields different together brings that basement scholarly strong inevita is it this, For drama. medical called culture popular of genre iconic an with biotechnology human medical and posthumanism of questions pressing the connects that discover ofthe the motivations creators. agendas and to helpful also was method analysis discourse this and issues; medical represented the discuss scientists and bloggers journalists, how discovered I series the of coverage media the of analysis the By characters. main the of lines story live the of materials theoretical and secondary of types several includes thesis The episodes. selected the watching and recaps of analysis content the I completed bioethics, andbiotechnology human medicalembodiment, posthuman 1.1.

series than the official ones since the above mentioned ones tend to focus on the private private the on focus to tend ones mentioned above the since ones official the than series Methods By using the concept of posthumanism this thesis aims to be an interdisciplinary work work interdisciplinaryan be to aims thesis this posthumanism of concept the using By prime two on focusing By Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

, I looked for recaps that are more informative about the medical content content medical the about informative more are that recaps for looked I

(20

like the philosopher Francis Fukuyama who focuses on the the on focuses who Fukuyama Francis philosopher the like 05 s concern the meaning of posthumanism and argue that it is it that argue and posthumanism of meaning the concern s - 2014) and 2014) - ie eeiin eia daa eis rpeetto of representation series’ drama medical television time E.R 4

(1994 - who are willing t willing are who

for comparison between scholarly and and scholarly between comparison for - 2011) by reading the official episode episode official the reading by 2011) o write for laypeople for write o ble to establish a establish to ble - , CEU eTD Collection towards expectations viewers’ the enhance series the moreover practitioners, andtechnologies sho dramas medical posthuman embodiment. practices thatsupport the of reflect specifically that approaches with continues and theories posthumanist different posthumanist rising as regardedbecan content of kind what Iexplain technologies medical modern the becauseof that embodiment posthuman of literature scholarly existing the on reviews critical c in embodiment posthuman 1.2. the series. of potentials infotainment the and content medical of perception audience’s the discusses that Kaiser the instance, for sources: important also are studies reception Audience topics. medical of platforms representational important became industries cultural and media the of products how understand to helps and genre a as drama medical perspectiveStudies tothe thesistopic. Gender the research, bring gender practitioner’s the about discussion the and technologies reproductive genetic o on understanding and better prosthetics provide transplantation, Hogle Linda and of Lock approaches Margaret Study Technology and Science technologies. new of challenges negative

Structure Chapter Two maps the emerging medical technologies and issues of posthumanism, posthumanism, of issues and technologies medical emerging the maps Two Chapter usef are Davin Solange and Turow Joseph theorist media of Writings hpe Tre xmns the examines Three Chapter

s T ws. ihn h slce daa. Thus dramas. selected the within ee eis ae ptnil o ae h adec tik bu medical about think audience the make to potential a have series hese

neto wt mdcl noain. y h etbihet of establishment the By innovations. medical with onnection ther boundary crossing medical practices. Assisted Assisted practices. medical crossing boundary ther general infotainment potential and effects of medical medical of effects and potential infotainment general

te hss trs ih h epaain of explanation the with starts thesis the ,

Foundation completed a research a completed Foundation l o examine to ul CEU eTD Collection rep the examined not have posthumanism with engaged are who thinkers those once, posthumanism: on literature e the furthermore, States; United the of borders the of outside context with series the connects literature academic The USA. the of outside widely circulate series the context, American outsi relevant be not 1.3. ornot. influenced posthumanism these whether medically decide of age forthcoming the to about optimistic be to possible people discouraging or encouraging be will it question this of examination the By anxieties? and uncertainties enhance that waya in or pacifyingway, futuristic, conservative,a the examine I thus fears, pote mediating even sometimes and anxieties reflections, ambiguous entail ideas posthumanist and machines, and humans between synergy emerging the innovations, contemporary of areas such emerging biomedicine include cases selected the thus innovations, medical crossings boundary the by existence to comes that embodiment mixed of examples important th how analyses and effective representational platform ofthemedical related issues ofposthumanism. physicians and medicine xamined questionsarexamined ofthe relevant USA. andimportant outside

Significance Chapter Four focuses on significant medical approaches of posthumanist embodiment embodiment posthumanist of approaches medical significant on focuses Four Chapter As a result of my thesis project, I identified a twofold gap within the scholarly scholarly the within gap twofold a identified I project, thesis my of result a As might series these representedin are that institutions medical the of circumstancesThe ntials of medical dramas. How do these series portrayal posthumanist ideas: in ideas: posthumanist portrayal series these do How dramas. medical of ntials

s eei rsac, rnpatto, n poteiain Biomedical prosthetization. and transplantation, research, genetic as

s ae ersne in represented are ese e f h Uie Sae, u dsie h fc ta bt daa st in set dramas both that fact the despite but States, United the of de resentations of posthumanism in medical dramas; second, scholars of of scholars second, dramas; medical in posthumanism of resentations . This part describes why it is useful to look at medical dramas as an an as dramas medical at look to useful is it why describes part This .

rys Anatomy Grey’s 6

and

E.R . The series provided provided series The .

series series CEU eTD Collection inmedicalthe representations dramas. ofposthumanism toward foron furtherresearchquestions raise to aim Ialso scholarlyand literature, existing the gapin feelings mediate the fill to to order in together potential questions these brings project a thesis This not. has or posthumanism genre the whether discuss posthuman and on reflects concepts, that genre the of content medical the perceives audience the how argue should studies perception Forthcoming machines. and human and species, other and human beings, human between boundaries the challenge and body human the alter effectively that technologies medical crossing boundary embodiment; robotized posthuman; to human sour useful are dramas medical that interpret argue I Thus, to it. of effects potentials possible the and dramas’ concepts posthumanist medical examined not have studies Cultural and Media ces to present and examine posthumanist concepts, just as the transformation of of transformation the as just concepts, posthumanist examine and present to ces

CEU eTD Collection conside have technologies these moreover lives, people’s on effect serious have medicine and informatics biotechnology, in advances developments, previously. human” “the be to considered have that we suggestions strong are there thresho and a created have developments medical and question, technological under is human the which in period future. posthuman biote medical of developments that claims and posthumans becoming introduces part This biotechnologies. human medical emerging to connected are human of meaning the discuss man thus humans, about ideas core challenge that questions complex for arena challenges. posthumanist serious poses that world 2.1. existence by modern theusagemedical of technologies. scho in circulate that issues the of some explain briefly I part this In entail. biomedicalization of process the and emotions various medical emerging as seen be embodimen posthuman should construct that technology what and series, drama medical within content

This historical moment is the time of radical ideas about human condition: we live in a a in live we condition: human about ideas radical of time the is moment historical This posthumanity Theorizing I posthumanist theterm under establish mean what chapter isto review The this aim of THEORIZING POSTHUMAN EMBODIMENT – The scholarly and popular discourses offers posthumanism as a label for a a for label a as posthumanism offers discourses popular and scholarly The

like fears, anxieties and excitementfears,and like anxieties da aot h cags n ua cniin, uh s ht epe are people that as such conditions, human in changes the about ideas al dsore aot h tasomto o te ua ta cms to comes that human the of transformation the about discourses larly CHA

PTER TWO 8

. t s lo ot t dsus n mp the map and discuss to worth also is It t. The field of biomedicine is a significant significant a is biomedicine of field The -

that these boundary practices thesecrossing that e tcnlgcl icvre and discoveries technological New

rable capacity to reconfigure the the reconfigure to capacity rable ld marking a “post” to what what to “post” a marking ld hooy ugs a suggest chnology

y debates that that debates y

CEU eTD Collection human? the after comes what numbered. or who is question The changes. are apocalyptic predict that ideas human the of days d dinosaurs the as just out die will that humans that state understandings Evolutionary states which terror, of concept the from humanity. of station next the mankind: of state a as posthumanity concepts some that states She dichotomy. terminological excitement versus terror like Francispessimists Fukuyama. differentiate can we thus issues, society. civic the and field scientific the within both anxiety and excitement strong create which problems, i since approaches, or examinehow to is important people are informedabout today these technologies. scientific mere than more assisted an than more is are posthumanism thus or concerns, technological that research issues gene ethical contradictory cloning, raise like reproduction developments that claim (2002) Fukuyama (2004 Esposito Roberto like politics of Scholars society. and politics to connected are effects forthcoming possibly or medical existing its and modern biotechnology of developments the that emphasize debates Such innovations. medical con possible the about concerns and questions important socially arehuman biotechnology medicine. connectedand directly to the of many way this in and developments nature. human called so the of understandings existing the and embodiment, human human, the of concept Hayles (1999) discusses the pro and contra arguments of posthumanism by using the using by posthumanism of arguments contra and pro the discusses (1999) Hayles a by surrounded is posthumanity of concept the Moreover, p indicate, debates scholarly the As There are scholars who explicitly express persuasions towards the contradictive the towards persuasions express explicitly who scholars are There I argue that posthumanism is posthumanism that argue I t is an open question and a controversial a and question open an is t between positivist thinkers like Katherine N. Hayles and and Hayles N. Katherine like thinkers positivist between

theoretical concepts and issues of posthumanism of issues and concepts theoretical raising because of the emerging biotechnological biotechnological emerging the of because raising shmns raises osthumanism 9

) and philosophy such as Francis Francis as such philosophy and )

academic concept academic

term that implicates issues and issues implicates that term considerable, ethically and and ethically considerable,

range of the debates and and debates the of range er aeuuly comes usually are Fears eune o emerging of sequences - id and support support and id

this is why it it why is this

r egard CEU eTD Collection the from missing is dominancy this but supremacy; natural provides logic humanist human currently that th of position privileged the challenges might system forthcoming the but latter, the controls former the cases the of most form. life dominant often is human the and way, whiteness, This heterosexuality. maleness, like humanity, of kinds some and forms the life other privileges over it human because criticize be should that basis ideological an on rests humanism Nayar’ K. Pramod for point reference a serve human of notions traditional The philosophy. or politics like perspectives different from humanism and human the of critique the with usuallystart approaches these and scholarship, posthumanist in technological that states reflexesdevelopmentson technology. and societies created humanist eroded thatdepend and perspective biotechnological a implies Herbrechter these. imp political and social the and assumptions philosophical theoretical, considers Review) existe human of meaning contemporary the discusses He (2013) Herbrechter Stefan to according an boxes old transgression forms leads new to ofconfigurations. the of out that get to emphasize people enables thinking, which of which way new a term, is it rather the humanity, of end the of necessarily not is understandings posthumanism reverse the introduces Hayles co human’s the machines; intelligent of age the be might stage next the including: options different are There nce and the question, what comes after the human. His book ( book His human. the after comes what question, the and nce The idea to conceptualize posthumanism in comparison with humanism humanism with comparison in posthumanism conceptualize to idea The with, facing are humans that stage evolutionary inevitable an is Posthumanity

provides an interdisciplinary framework to examine posthumanism: for instance, he he instance, for posthumanism: examine to framework interdisciplinary an provides - existence and symbiosis with posthumans with symbiosis and existence The current world order contains human and nonhuman actors, and in in and actors, nonhuman and human contains order world current The a rgt ad aaiis o oiae te seis bcue the because species, other dominate to capacities and rights has e human above the environment and other species. species. other and environment the above human e 10

ecie a a itntv, xlsoay and exclusionary distinctive, a as described

; or transformation to posthumanity. to transformation or ; s (2009) analyses, who claims that that claims who analyses, (2009) s d binaries, and the posthumanist posthumanist the and binaries, d Posthumanism often appears often Nayar argues Nayar - lications of of lications

A Critical A

CEU eTD Collection and states thatovervalued: humanity is leaded value is it as posthumanism age of toseeposition the say They humanity. common against is their posthumanism lose and people humanity states that posthumanism against critiques the of face leaded value the b the of boundaries the to connected are that attitudes re thorough for engaging be should age posthumanist 14) unitary or coherency of creation the or domination for desire the by driven not are they and motivations, different have posthumans that state They 10) absolute. nonhuman the and human the between differences hi activityand gender.This and classrace, according to humans andspecies logic,question by as just the theposthumanist non and material technological; other; the order. world posthumanist

2012 pp. avoided.” be to something itself is transformation species worlds, humans than other something us make will it that fact very the is posthuman According other domesticate humans that emphasize also (1999) Livingstone and Halberstam “According to these sorts of arguments, then, a strong reason for avoiding becoming avoiding for reason strong a then, arguments, of sorts these to “According

the id n te body; the and mind 76 - o hn n Harris and Chan to 77)

H umanism builds on dualisms and divisions just as the as just divisions and dualisms on builds umanism - material. These polar points and the boundaries the and points polar These material.

oit ad nature; and society

(2012) a loss and a legitimized reason for grief reasonfor regret; and legitimized and a loss a 11 order and the connectedness of andconnectedness species.order the

te osby otcmn avn o the of advent forthcoming possibly the , iological species. The authors highlight highlight authors The species. iological - consideration of our moral values and values moral our of consideration

ua ad animal; and human . (Halberstam and Livingstone: Livingstone: and (Halberstam .

Hlesa ad Livingstone: and (Halberstam (Chan and Harris, and (Chan erarchy makes the the erarchy makes

organic and and organic called into into called ; in other in ; self and and self

CEU eTD Collection newembodiment formsbrings of controversial together terms: bodies, human than different entirely and complex more are bodies posthuman that state They vii) Livingstone: and (Halberstam humanities. and humanism, human, the displace open an give to aim and embodiment and bodies the posthuman of questions several discuss they InPreface, body. human the of figure coherent the to challenges various represent that essays 2.2. through developments emergingmedical andthe processesof transformation. entail and excitement anxieties, that posthumanism of comprehensions contradictory the of introduction the After reality. into moral a only not is Posthumanism di series. drama medical like products by enhanced be to have which engagement, critical and awareness public require that technologies medical of level the beyond posthumanism scientific of concept the examine to worth is it that reinforce life” ofmastery. instead ofthe politics He posthumanism. of sides positive the and essence the scussion, because there is a high possibility to turn its theories and preliminary predictions predictions preliminary and theories its turn to possibility high a is there because scussion,

Bodies Posthuman Embodiment The Posthuman technologies medical emerging and understandings theoretical contradictory The find to intends biopolitics on focuses (2004) Esposito Robert scholar Italian Contrary, laue vrult ad elt, e ad t cneune. h pshmn oy s a is body posthuman The consequences. its and sex reality, and virtuality pleasure, “Posthuman bodies are the causes and effects of postmodern relations of power and power of relations postmodern of effects and causes the are bodies “Posthuman

n naig niaint cnet icrieadbd rltd ofgrtos that configurations related body and discursive connect to invitation engaging and discussions. These ambiguous theories are supported by existing and forthcoming and existing by supported are theories ambiguous These discussions.

edited by Judith Halberstam and Ira Livingstone is a collection of collection a is Livingstone Ira and Halberstam Judith by edited the next section

focuses onposthu asks how it could be the “politics of “politics the be could it how asks

man embodiment that risingman embodiment

and the the and CEU eTD Collection animalserodes thatalltogether importanceof thatconsiderthe context a in negotiated be to human has human the andof notions traditional that biomedicalization states he and the biotechnology; as such technologies different by influenced already the him to According dependence. and difference, pp. 2009, (Nayar human the th NayarcalledPosthumanity,states field study new a of questions research and characteristics general focus, the up setting After theoretical affects concept ofposthumanism everyday people’s life: and philosophical contradictory the developments biomedical and biotechnological futuristic on elaborate also Nayar place. radica a and condition material a as posthumanism takes materiality of transcendence the where stage a is thatit importanceclaims Cary materiality and examinesthe of inposthumanism Wolfe posthumanities.” of zoo a of but man<< of family >>the of part longer no is itself body human The techno a body, deadly a body, contaminated scre a technology, the mediated (surgically/chemically/electronically) discipline “This

subject

perception of

that the

connected,

Posthumanities.” will (Halbers en, a projected image; it is a body under the sign of AIDS, a a AIDS, of sign the under body a is it image; projected a en,

is have

) n epaie h iprac o smiss assimilation, symbiosis, of importance the emphasize and 2)

the the concept (Nayarthe 2009, ofhuman. pp.

tam and Livingstonetam and 1995,

to posthuman: at biotechnologies question the basis of Huma of basis the biotechnologiesquestion at

be th

studied e technological interfacing of humans, machines humans, of technologicalinterfacinge (Nayar genetically

13 human

the

2009, within l reassessment of the human. At the age of of age the At human. the of reassessment l

- new body; it is, as we shall see, a queer body. body. queer a see, shall we as is, it body;

c with

ontemporary notions of humanity are are humanity of notions ontemporary

pp.

“subject” the

5) a

modified,

pp.

distributed hybridized,

) of

the

connected, 3)

Humanities.

consciousness

nities itself: nities

hybridized modified

This

and and

CEU eTD Collection of humandevelopment, anecessary as steptoachieve a future. posthuman several stage intermediate an as transhumanism see believers its of Many improvements. medical and the of Despite future. h to response optimistic an as defined be can is it and movement, a and posthumanist a to ideology an is step Transhumanism synonyms. not are transhumanism and post misunderstandings necessary a as regarded 2.3. the and development human of stages technological transformation. body the between transcendence the on elaborates secti next the scholars: between enhancement by and shaped naturean place takes enhancement human that states and enhancement human and evolution natural contemporary inhuman consequences thesimultaneously. trends discuss the probable Theyof of combination the today the limit current its extend behinds lifespan human might technologies new that claim They being. into come entities how ways posthuman the examine and posthumans, be to people turn technologies new the whether core are technologies enhancement emerging

“Transhumanism is a loosely defined movement that has developed gradu developed has that movement defined loosely a is “Transhumanism transhumani of critiques and concept the introduce I part, this In Transhumanism question discussed often an also is posthuman and human between transformation The of perils and promises prospective the and posthumanism, of notions Biotechnological at w dcds I pooe a itricpiay prah o nesadn and understanding to approach interdisciplinary an promotes It decades. two past

n nrdcs h ie o tasuaim ht extensively that transhumanism of idea the introduces on s are already the products of that evolution which includes includes which evolution that of products the already are s

d technology. (Chan and Harris 2012, pp. and (ChanHarrisd technology. 2012, s and the capacities of the human body. As they state, state, they As body. human the of capacities the and s 14

points in Chan and Harris essay that wonders wonders that essay Harris and Chan in points

uman biotechnologicaluman

m wih s often is which sm, 78) ally over the over ally

CEU eTD Collection ris the that acknowledge and technology, of effects side the address that approaches transhumanist are there because optimism, technological democracy at risk liberal puts that nature human alter to them allow may it and evolution own their control to humans allows biotechnology that claims and beings human of enhancement biotechnological crit biggest the of one As risks. serious entails that posthumanism, and humanism namely ends, two the between stage a as transhumanism him, to According age. the of phenomena threatening most the of one har and dangers extensively potential the who address scholars those of one is (2002) Fukuyama humanism. of intensification engineered entities. g forthcoming the sees it and limits, psychical and physical their transcend to able are people which in stage, artificialevolutional an as defined often is it and body the and nanotechnology molecular as just intelligence. ones future anticipated the second, engineering; genetic like technologies existing already the first, biotechnologies: medical humans. of capacities psychological Acco and physical intellectual, the enhance and aging, eliminate that developments the and perfectibility human longevity, general of potentials rding to Bostrom’s categorization, categorization, Bostrom’s to rding u a Bsrm as tasuaim hud o b ascae o eutd with equated or associated be not should transhumanism says, Bostrom as But the as it sees (2011) Wolfe ways: contradictory in transhumanism on reflect Scholars futuristic the on focuses which transhumanism, supports biotechnology Human human the and openedorganism upby advancementtechnology.” condition human the enhancing for opportunities the evaluating Transhumanism contains radical ideas about the technological transformation of of transformation technological the about ideas radical contains Transhumanism

and lead might toradical inequality.

qe f rnhmns, e tts ht rnhmns i a is transhumanism that states he transhumanism, of ique ms of posthumanism too, states that transhumanism is transhumanism that states too, posthumanism of ms transhumanism has a double focus regarding to to regarding focus double a has transhumanism 15

s f h ipoeet ut e taken be must improvement the of ks

(Bostrom 2003 nrto a biologically as eneration , pp. 493)

CEU eTD Collection as blurs entities between distinction the animals: and machines humans, between boundaries core embodiment andthe interaction present biotechnologyposthumanism. betweenand human technologi several discusses the represent and that perspective; practices medical biomedical a from posthumanism of age forthcoming 2.4. representations medical ofcertain practices. or accepted be should that embraced? something improvements medical transhumanist and post Are change? potential and question the of uneasiness moral the and not, or transformation this How dramas? medical in represented is body human the of capacity the enhance technologically to potential the how is question The body. posthuman the construct that technologies medical crossing no the on elaborates It humanism. which pp. perspectiv transhumanist aFrom today.have beings human than capacities greater have entities posthuman which in a future, to posthuman leads improvement technologic and scientific of use responsible the Only seriously. 493)

da aot ua beings. human about ideas The field of biomedicine is a significant arena for complex questions that challenge that questions complex for arena significant a is biomedicine of field The the reinforces that biomedicalization of processes the on focuses chapter This biotechnologies, medical examines that part the to lead approaches Transhumanist eae h hmn body, human the remake

Emerging Biomedical Technologies Technologies Biomedical Emerging s itoue n hs hpe ae ihl cnetd o otuait oin of notions posthumanist to connected tightly are chapter this in introduce I es

hpe Four Chapter

er o pplr utr dsuss hte te ua i under is human the whether discusses culture popular of genre

will discuss these issues in more detail and elaborate on the the on elaborate and detail more in issues these discuss will itcnlgcl prahs f otuaim xlr the explore posthumanism of approaches Biotechnological tion of biomedicalization that based on modern, boundary boundary modern, on based that biomedicalization of tion hleg is aaiis ad h taiinl oin of notions traditional the and capacities, its challenge lrig onais f ua ebdmn. The embodiment. human of boundaries blurring

e, humans a humans e, 16

re works re - in progress. (Bostrom 2003, 2003, (Bostromprogress. in

CEU eTD Collection techno increasing the is practices and innovations the of character common o kind new a is health cultures, consumer within because today, important particularly are that practices such of improvement the in role inevitable an have services and products projects, research biomedical privatized and corporatized including economy, biopolitical but practices, different through manifested and constituted is Biomedicalization care. health of level institutional the and processes, healing illness, health, of approaches former an pharmacogenomics, genomics, genetics, biotechnologies, visualization, including technologies medical emerging by and influenced is digitalization lives their live they how and life about think people how way the them, of extension the is that C of conceptualization biomedicalization the to according medicalization called process the of results and elements selection sexual research, cell stem cloning, technology, gene babies, designer organs, c technologies. capacityandenhancement practices medical regenerative between differences the and body; human the of limitations quest also developments these of Some innovations. biomedical modern of result the eto o ciea ad yrd b uig ua genes; human using by hybrids and chimeras of reation Newaims ofmedicine: havechanged technologies the interventions not only for treatment but increasingly also for enhancement or or enhancement for also increasingly optimization.” but treatment for only not interventions quic through largely accomplished are by These them means. of technoscientific transformations emphasize contrast, in practices, biomedicalization phenomena medical over typica practices medicalization conventional “While

(Clarke and Sh - im 2011, im

ies, lnse, nuis bdl malfunctions bodily injuries, illnesses, disease, Practices like artificial reproduction technologies,the reproductionartificial like Practices d nanotechnologies. These innovations altered the altered innovations These nanotechnologies. d 17 pp.

173)

larke and Shim and larke

lly emphasize exercising control exercising emphasize lly h cre the ation of body parts and and parts body of ation

(2011) - The commodity. f

scientific nature, nature, scientific . According to to According . high k ion the ion - tech tech

are -

CEU eTD Collection natural. toget comes of sources bodily enhancement: are these but body, the repair that practices only not are technologies medical technologies. real in but sacred, or static as seen embodiment. B and thinkaboutlife influencehow people way the it but body, human the of construction the alter only not medicine modern that reinforces unde and the extend notions received the change phenomenon and this and technology, and establish human between interface technologies enhancement and implants prosthetics, of usage human. and nature of categories granted for taken the question significantly most that practices those are bioinformatics and forms life artificial scientific come identities techno of kind new but transforming, are bodies only not innovations, of result the as and otuaim ht ae o te ehnzto ad eiaiain f h bd and body the of medicalization and mechanization the on based that Posthumanism 2007 pp. life.” for necessary or normal be to considered is what beyond traits physical incr but function, of restoration and repair on based been have these of Most available. made assists and procedures of kinds the in growth rapid been has there body, the augmenting Hogle’s As

“W Nayar states that the technological interfacing of humans and machines, humans and humans machines, and humans of interfacing technological the that states Nayar rstandings of the human (Hogle, 2007 2007 (Hogle, human the of rstandings t te ehooia cpblt ad oil cetblt o mdfig and modifying of acceptability social and capability technological the ith her with the technologization of those processes that formerly were considered as as considered were formerly that processes those of technologization the with her h techno The 856) (2007)

to existence (ClarkeS and aigy tcnqe ae en epoe t ipoe etl and mental improve to employed being are techniques easingly, - cetfc hrce o te noain ipiae ta modern that implicates innovations the of character scientific study states transplantation, assisted artificial reproduction, reproduction, artificial assisted transplantation, states study ity these boundaries can be transgressed by medical medical by transgressed be can boundaries these ity 18

(Hogl him, 2011pp. him, pp. e, 2007 e, 858) eerh n hs questions these on Research

pp. odily boundaries are usually boundariesare usually odily 178). 854).

She claims that claims She (Hogle, the - CEU eTD Collection and genetics, as: just devel and usage the influence might practices medical certain of application the commonalities of result a as that entails presentation This technologies. biomedical certain of characteristics consequencesposthumanist practices: ofbiomedical betweendistinctions humanand machine. challenge the and capacities thebodily enhance newest prototypes the many of body but parts, 2009 (Nayar, organism self the of idea the and humanism of notions former the eroded animals 2. 1. opment of other technologies. She lists commonalities between organ transplantation transplantation organ between commonalities lists She technologies. other of opment

t uses also She of forms new for potential embodiment andidentity.” the with associated are human turn in shifting which and collectivities, subjectivities, fluid bodies, postmodern hybrid, of presence choice no have researchers that clear abundantly it make screening and testing genetic of and technology transplant of practices “The the using By has the right to make decisions aboutfor it, has instance therightmake to inthe case decisions of organ donation? the question technologies Biomedical complex and apparatus special infrastructure oftechno the require biomedicalization of Technologies

xmls f rnpatto ad eeis Lc as rfet o the on reflects also Lock genetics, and transplantation of examples

pp. pp. ee w patcs s xmls n re t itrrt h common the interpret to order in examples as practices two hese 3). - For instance, Forinstance, medicine;

(Lock, 2007pp.

advanced p advanced 19 ownership of the body: who owns it and who and it owns who body: the of ownership

893) 893)

rosthetics not only only not rosthetics

u t rcgie h ubiquitous the recognize to but - encl replace the missing missing the replace osed bi osed ological ological

CEU eTD Collection the from disconnected is body female the embodiment: sex the challenge to possible it makes reproduction of roles, andboundaries and theordinary humanbody limits ofthe are practices biomedical m posthumanist important most the of one gender of perspective motherhood. and fertility of notions traditional the and divisions, technology and field medicine of personalized and preventive technologies the improve to helps body, the on control effective more provides that developments further body the of structure inner hidden, the detect to possible it make mapping genetic like Technologies, body. human the of edically assisted reproductive technologies that that technologies reproductive assisted edically gender . 3. Technologization of reproduction of Technologization

As Hughes and Dvorsky claims, by the usage of artificial technologies the importance the technologies artificial of usage the by claims, Dvorsky and Hughes As 2008, gender.” of transcending the address to began body human usi transhumanist about and discourses posthumanist however, century, 21st the of beginning the “At M future medical predictable the is technologies modern of promises biggest the of One 876) exi the questions body, the of boundaries the challenges and hybridity, entails technologies biomedical the of application The

odern and p and

pp. arental roles are eliminated in human reproduction. They suggest that artificial artificial that suggestThey reproduction. human in eliminated are roles arental reproductive technologies like in vitro technologies also challenge the human the challenge also technologies vitro in like technologies reproductive 7)

and its encoded characteristics. This knowledge is necessary for for necessary is knowledge This characteristics. encoded its and g ehoois o netoal tased h lmttos f the of limitations the transcend intentionally to technologies ng provides a different understanding of materiali of understanding different a provides 20

sti reproductive ng notions of embodiment (Lock 2007, (Lock embodiment of notions ng hleg taiinl eul n gender and sexual traditional challenge capacity .

limits of the human body human the of limits :

of reproduction, human life human reproduction, of

(Hughes and Dvorsky Dvorsky and (Hughes From the the From ty and and ty

and pp. CEU eTD Collection consider,Linda becauseas medicine for isaninevitable claims, instance, Hogle part human of e an political ethical, of range wide a imply technologies new thus capacities; given original, its of enhancement the by or boundaries stable formerly its challenging by body 2.5. and destabilization the in role transformation ofthe term. important act approaches technological and perspectives: political biological and social from challenged only not gender of concepts the today technol medical advanced of application the on based is system postgender A systemgender; upa andtobuild postgender and ofsex order: reproduction. natural called so the of product the not are posthumans thus, nature, than technology to connected more body the pregnancy replace to able be might wombs artificial and body, human the of outside existence to come f et adrprusos (Lock repercussions. and fects

As Lock sees it, practitioners of biomedical technologies can manipulate the human the manipulate can technologies biomedical of practitioners it, sees Lock As consequences harms and Potential of application Dvorsky, 2008pp. technologies.” the reproductive through and species biotechnology human neurotechnology, bio the involuntary in of gendering elimination psychological the foresee and potential, on human limitation unnecessary and arbitrary an is gender that argue “Postgenderists . In a posthumanist age posthumanist a In a : ssistive ssistive practices 2)

This world order h order world This

just as in vitro fertilization places fertilization vitro in as just

it is an is it 2007 , pp. ordinary phenomenon, and the term reproduction is is reproduction term the and phenomenon, ordinary 875) Modern medical technologies are worth to worth are technologies medical Modern 875) 21

as serious potential to destabilize the existing the destabilize to potential serious as

the reproduction outside of of outside reproduction the ogies, therefore therefore ogies, Hge and (Hughes oia and logical d social social d CEU eTD Collection essa His regulation. of necessity the about decisions preliminary make to easy not is it that admits He regulation. political or control institutional require developments dis critical most the of one and technologies, interest always not ofscientists is civicequals societies’. the with conside by developments, of threats and impacts, premises, supposed the examine to have regulators thus innovations, of consequences forthcoming imagined the and the influence policies health thus t regulated governmentally cases many in are posthumanist future a suggest that Innovations research. medical and improvement, biomedical and issues concerns. these with aware be to have people that argue I ambiguities, and effects these of Because human. the of transformation the and condition posthuman the of improvement mora ethical, causes whole. a as society the also but individual, the affect only not technologies these of many because inevi is it thus scientific, only not are technologies medical of effects of the and levels different meaning in ambiguities to the lead human in changes The anxiety. and excitement eventuate technologies medical 2007, (Hogle technologies new the about discussions in appear often scenarios future fantastical and hand, one in promising are innovations Emerging not. or bodied able and healthy is one whether fr life of aspects every permeate technologies medical and life ransformational potential of posthumanist medical practices.medicalB posthumanist of ransformationalpotential cusses

Scholars emphasize the potential harms and negative consequences of such such of consequences negative and harms potential the emphasize Scholars technologies, medical and human modern by constructed embodiment Posthuman

These advances provide agenda for bioethics, which reflects on clinical practices, practices, clinical on reflects which bioethics, for agenda provide advances These that there are technologies that are frightening from the beginning and these these and beginning the from frightening are that technologies are there that pp. 4) Bt t h sm tim same the at But 842). , n sca ucranis bu mdcl eeomns ht ul the fuel that developments medical about uncertainties social and l, al t cnie mrl n lgl mlctos particularly implications legal and moral consider to table 22 s rni Fkym. n i book his In Fukuyama. Francis is e, innovations are also ambiguous, thus new new thus ambiguous, also are innovations e,

om the beginning until the end the until beginning the om ioethics deals with the existingwith the deals ioethics

ring the fact that the that fact the ring y (2012) (2012)

(2002) he he (2002) states that that states CEU eTD Collection lives ofpeople, the ofissues and representation practices are important factors: impli have biotechnology human and biomedicine modern knowledge. of medical of distribution representationthe and practices medical modern and communication the about think we if consideration of object be to medic and health on focuses particularly that drama medical genrelike a thus medicine, on perception people’s in role important an have media new the and Internet traditional the beyond medicalchannels forums new and biomedicalization in role important play knowledge of medical transfer and production The concern. important an becomes knowledge biomedical of and impact on the lives ofindividuals complexity huma evolution, ofhuman pr of despite externalities: negative and The effects side unknown the these. safety, of question the control from come developments of harms that potential mechanisms governmental the and technologies the on depends 2012, generally biotechnologies future of benefits the

ongoing biotechnological revolution already has inevitable social consequences, and the the and consequences, social inevitable has already revolution biotechnological ongoing pp. culture.” Biomedici (…) prescription direct through and magazines, in Internet, the on newspapers, especially media, of kinds all through proliferating is illness and health on information “Today, serious have technologies emerging where biomedicalization, of age the at Thus, 157).

He argues that the innovations migh innovations the that argues He (Clarke and Shim 2011, (Clarke and Shim showed communication. importantmedical upand in became e s oa s mc a udmna eeet f mass of element fundamental a much so today is ne the society as a whole, the distribution and consumption awhole,distribution as the the society n na eliminary research, it is possible to misunderstand the misunderstand to possible is it research, eliminary pp. ture beings. and 2012, (Fukuyama regarded 177) 23

t be better or worse for humans, but it it but humans, for worse or better be t to be socially good things good socially be to ain ta afc te everyday the affect that cations Since improvements of of improvements Since al related questions has has questions related al pp.

158) - to (Fuku - consumer consumer

yama:

CEU eTD Collection transformation ofthe bod posthumanist of issues specific some understand to order in representation series’ dramas medical in enacted are posthumanism about discussions these how at look to useful is it that valuabl provide and developments medical on understanding public’s the enhance dramas medical how discusses of chapter next meaning The human. the challenge medically that human technologies of working medical and existence the and with embodiment posthuman these on of consequences possible the and biotechnologies literature scholarly of overview called be can content of genera the After kind cases. of range wide a what represent that dramas selected the clarify within posthuman and discuss to was review this of aim The more generally.” understandin to contribute will and technology twenty the in emerging practices and knowledge, of forms techniques, The society. and technology, of area an been has technologies medical of study the that wonder little is it governance, and labor, life, on effects dramatic such “With - first century promise to be fruitful ground for future studies of medical of studies future for ground fruitful be to promise century first

(Hogle 2007, (Hogle y it. feelingsand the towards

pp. 865) 24 e medical information for the audience. I argue argue I audience. the for information medical e

gs of science, technology, and society and technology, science, of gs

I argue that people have to be aware be to have people that argue I

intense focus in studies of science, of studies in focus intense l CEU eTD Collection case studies. and articles including series these of coverage media the on elaborateI literaturescholarly the underst audience the how on effect their and series such of potential infotainment the genre, the of characteristics A of analysis the and reviews its by gap this fill to aims thesis This and dramas. medical posthumanism on elaborations further of approaches the extend could that debate of a from dramas medical of content pers the posthumanist examined not have studies cultural and media of scholars second and dramas; medical in posthumanism of representations the considered the in posthuman identified about I ideas various introduce genre gap The perspective. this from dramas medical on workscholarly no thereis but embodiment, this of Products research. medical tho with especially cases, E.R. as such dramas medical that Iargue concepts. posthumanist portraysthat science that notice to important is it However, analyses. their from genres other out leave usually they but content; futuristic of kinds other science as such natomy

display significant posthumanist content through many of their represented medical medical represented their of many through content posthumanist significant display hs hpe eaie itoue te eetd w mdcl rms te general the dramas, medical two selected the introduces examines chapter This Herbrechter Stephan like posthumanism, of Scholars

and

E.R. - itos ht xlcty rsn pshmns, rnhmns, yoga, or Cyborgian, transhumanist, posthumanist, present explicitly that fictions

pective. Consequently, the scholarly discussion misses two potential fields potential two misses discussion scholarly the Consequently, pective. story lines thatpresent issues. story lines posthumanist

ands posthuman embodiment and embodiment posthuman ands scholarly work is two sided: first, posthumanist scholars have not not have scholars posthumanist first, sided: two is work scholarly se that reflect on the issues of modern human biotechnology and and biotechnology human modern of issues the on reflect that se MEDICAL DRAMAS CHAPTER THREE 25

fiction is not the only genre in popular culture popular in genre only the not is fiction

modern medical technologies. Beyond technologies. medical modern

(2012) ae xmnd genres examined have Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s Grey’s

and and CEU eTD Collection 2 Mercy West. Grace Pediatric Surgery; Plastic 1 Surgery; Orthopedic Neurosurgery; and Neurology Surgery; specialization the through medicine co they thus reliability and accuracy professional to attention big turn creators The practitioners. have cases the of all nearly and lines, story personal their improve and characters the between tension relational the underscore usually cases The The seasons. first areprotagonists colleagues, re her other ofthe including show interns, the in intern surgical a is who Grey, Meredith of perspective the from in based story The season. tenth its in is it currently and 2005 at started drama medical winner award multiply popular, This Rhimes. Shonda by written is it and (ABC) Company Broadcasting 3.1.1. Grey’s Anatomy 3.1. Link to the official website’s description: description: website’s official Linkthe to During the ten season ten the During - prt wt mdcl xets. h story The expertise. medical with operate

eainhp cn e eie i bak n wie Ra lf ol cms n hds of grey.” shades in comes only life Real white. and neit black in defined that be can relationships discovering they're Together friendship. than more basis daily a on “‘ Grey’s series of theselected General introduction the fictional medical complex called Grey called complex medical fictional the The doctors of doctors The 2

Anatomy

s , th ,

e hospital had different names: names: different had hospital e

is an American prime American an is it's in one another that they find comfort, friendship and, at times, times, at and, friendship comfort, find they that another one in it's Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital deal with life with deal Hospital Memorial Sloan Grey

http://abc.go.com/shows/greys

f h caatr: characters: the of 26 - time television series created by the American the by created series television time

mainly focuses on the following fields of of fields following the on focuses mainly first it was called Seattle Grace Hospital, than than Hospital, Grace Seattle called was it first - Sloan Memorial Hospital Memorial Sloan

a message or a life lesson for the the for lesson life a or message a Cardiothoracic Surgery; General General Surgery; Cardiothoracic - anatomy/about sidents and specialists. sidents - or - - death consequences death the e mdcn nor medicine her 1 - show

and it it and

is written written is Seattle Seattle

- CEU eTD Collection Link: 4 3 radically were episodes Some rights. LGBT and HIV/AIDS as it just issues moreover social pressing prosthetizations, and transplantations like cases surgical present about storylines includes and department emergency hospital’s the on focuses mainly and Chicago in hospital teaching consu scriptwriters the accuracy, medical physicians, care and health nurses, providers to commitment the keep to order in and medicine of representation reliable with drama realistic a make to was creators the he crea rather profession; this practiced never he physician, trained a was he Although 1970s. highest rank the as hailed series the of season first the study, Davin’s to According Crichton. history is this and seasons 3.1 disease; andc my to according cases, categorization of kinds different presents series The ER. and Trauma Surgery;

Link to the official website’s description: description: website’s official Linkthe to Alley, Randall: „Prosthetist Consults on 'ER'” on Consults „Prosthetist Alley,Randall: .2. ted the basic ideas of of ideas thebasic ted ing drama in the Americaning viewers. inthe history:about drama 35million media had it http://www.oandp.com/articles/news_2004 E.R. 3 The story based in the fictional Cook County General Hospital, which is an urban urban an is which Hospital, General County Cook fictional the in based story The movie first the created Crichton Michael screen to started NBC

and

its ases that are connectedases toresearch projectormedicaltrials. thatare these can be liste be can these

creators including the award the includingcreators h lnet unn prime running longest the

E.R. h Tam ad eea Srey Byn eegny cases emergency Beyond Surgery. General and Trauma the

based on his education and experiences as an intern. an andexperiences as education onhis based d under four main types: routine routine types: main four under d E.R. http://www.nbc.com/er n 94 n edd t n 09 Te eis a fifteen had series The 2009. in it ended and 1994 in The O&PEDGE The - 02 - - 02_02.asp . winning producer John Wells and writer Michaelwriter andWells John producer winning 4 27

- ie eia daa n mrcn television American in drama medical time format version of the story at the end of the of end the at story the of version format

(June, 2014) (June, , 2004 ,

(June, 2014) (June,

cases;

emergency

The aim of The cases; rare rare cases; td with lted presented E.R. -

CEU eTD Collection content the comprehend to harder is it if Ever easily.and gowell always not thingsMoreover, fo instructions fast and activities blurring the with up keep they that ambiguity of importance the realized creators the because rises that series drama medical of renaissance the be cannot stories explained the thus dramatic fully and obvious too argument, his to according attention: Collee for theadvertisers. important most the are that groups those including audience large attracts format the industry: M popularity. g the and time first the for attention huge gain dramas medical because mistaken, was standpoint this But time. free their in suffering and sick watch to want not do people that supposed they because executives senior the by rejected first was idea his CBS, the at development of charge in was Felton drama. medical a create to intended who Davin Solange As 1950’s. 3.2. from the scholarly literature. missing currently that perspective posthumanist a from series these examines which Four, Iraq. in and presented medical missions u the differentthan

oee, h genre the However, Medic Dramas of Medical General Introduction Chapter in provided be will series the about information further necessary is it Where (1999) al drama has been a popular genre since its first appearance at the end of the the of end the at appearance first its since genre popular a been has drama al

edical dramas have an extraordinary position in the contemporary television television contemporary the in position extraordinary an have dramas edical states, medical dramas became obscure and ambiguous in order to gain more more gain to order in ambiguous and obscure became dramas medical states, se do not engage the audience emotionally. He calls the end of the 1990s as 1990s the of end the calls He emotionally. audience the engage not do se sual ones: ones: sual

(2003) et hog svrl hne drn te at eae. s John As decades. last the during changes several through went E.R.

raised awareness about the humanitarian crisis in the Sudan the in crisis humanitarian the about awareness raised writes in her essay, in 1959 Norman Felton was the first first the was Felton Norman 1959 in essay, her in writes

enre preserv enre ed and renewed its renewed and ed r instance. r but CEU eTD Collection problematic it find I and factor, enhancing rate a as doctors fictional the of attractiveness cases. represented the through questions death and life interpret that content emotional presents it because popular, is genre the summary, In popularity: its there that explain are threemainreasons shows these in interest viewers’ the and genre the of popularity the behind stand could else What their than predecessors. satisfying and profound more are products these series, medical newest the of ? medicine of world foraudiences unfamiliar the understanding for map a provide p still they be contradictory, sometimes fact in may medicine of representations these and frightening While maze. medical the as enter will lives, our in well point one at us, of as All overwhelming. exciting and engaging simultaneously is that world to characters aud offers drama medical the attractive Last, audiences. represent charisma, and expertise television their Second, with relationships. physicians examine and plots along move to device prime the in inherent drama the “First, interpretation own put our onevents.” to us enabling while depth and richness adds ambiguity moral The happening. what’s out work to trying in intellectually us engage jargon the and chaos The complexity. its medunderstandthe don’t we that fact “The Strauman

and

Goodier

states that the genre is ever changing but always strong, and and strong, always but changing ever is genre the that states .” .” ( often life and death struggle of medicine offers a a offers medicine of struggle death and life often Strauman

29 (Co

Their argument emphasizes the charisma and and charisma the emphasizes argument Their

llee ical process makes us more appreciative of of appreciative more makesus process ical

and iences a glimpse into the backstage of a a of backstage the into glimpse a iences 1999

Goodier , pp. 955 olmtc uraitc and unrealistic, roblematic,

2008, - 956

pp. )

131.)

CEU eTD Collection Turow says:Joseph specialist, media As advertisers. the from money gain to order in audience the of attention compan television commercial of products as considered be Foundation’s research on Kaiser the as just exemptions, are there But form. entertaining an in knowledge scientific seriesforget are useful theaudience sources toinformation medical ornot. these whether examine Ipart this in Thus, issues. medical about learn to series drama medical 3.3. because them, for soonerto face or they later have issues. withmedical important is knowledge medical Thus life. their during extend bigger sma a in medicine of institution the to connected personally are they because series these on react emotionally people that reinforces it since argument, thesis the to connected percentag the engagebigger order Supposedly,to a in model former representational changedthe shows these ofcreators characters. fallible prefer might others but viewers certain for attractive has series practitioners new of changed: entirely portrayal positive sided, one the above, discussed was it as because

power. The storytelli The power. limited only companyhas production a or writer a tale, TV any in story, medical a “In i aim first that’s documentaries as examined be not should series These v the and audience the for important is information medical see, we As infotainment as Medical dramas industry. Telling stories stories Telling industry. on television above is, agame all, ofpower.” o te uine ih h peetd hrces Te hr raos s h most the is reasons third The characters. presented the with audience the of e

Grey’s Anatomy ng process is shaped from within and from without the television television the without from and within from shaped is process ng

sal peet aiu tps f otr. hrsa ih be might Charisma doctors. of types various present usually

shows, but in most ofthe most cases,but in shows, these have series to

ies, which seek good rates and the the and rates good seek which ies,

(Turow: xiii) (Turow: s to transmit to s iewers use use iewers ller or or ller

CEU eTD Collection iss human general treatments, watching by medicine of disease, practices and physiology, symptoms, about learnt they that reported viewers tr a as and described They questions. medical in interest their expressed respondent the and series, this watch they why viewer’s the asked researchers The narratives. of perception audience’s essay Her interpretations. emotional through audience medical content. seri the of perception the on focused that studies reception former using by content of kind these to regarding arguments analogue make to possible is it literature, scholarly existing the concepts.Whi posthumanist of platforms representational effective are series these that reinforce to order in potential, representations ofmedicinerequireex careful cultural popular interests, contradictory the of because clear, becomes it As audience. the mislead probably they institutions, medical of interests the entirely serve they if thus content, expectatio audience’s the of aware usually are creators the hand, other the in ground.But common the find to try industries cultural the of leaders the and executives of field a as life confl to come dramas medical like shows where the culture regards popular He of xv) (Turow:industry institution. an as medicine the of perception the on impact of portrayals the influence the and in guide medicine to try authorities medical that states also Turow ues that were addressed in the show, and institution of the American health care system. care health American the of institution and show, the in addressed were that ues icts and contradictive interests, in which medical institutions, social power, production production power, social institutions, medical which in interests, contradictive and icts As It

is important to examine the possibilities and limitations of the genre’s infotainment infotainment genre’s the of limitations and possibilities the examine to important is ai cam mdcl rms rvd rlal mdcl n sca dt fr the for data social and medical reliable provide dramas medical claims Davin swrh, eibe ore f eia ifrain n kolde Mn o the of Many knowledge. and information medical of source reliable ustworthy,

level of fictions too, because these representations could have significant significant have could representations these because too, fictions of level E.R. le the analysis of the series posthumanist readings is missing from missing series readings is posthumanist le the the analysis of ’s medical content and the audience’s responses to these these to responses audience’s the and content medical ’s amination witha certainamount ofsustenance 31

E.R.

introduces a study that examined the examined that study a introduces

Moreover, they learned about social about learned they Moreover, E.R. as a quality entertainment quality a as ns towards reliable reliable towards ns es’

CEU eTD Collection A viewers. million 20 about has usually that series rated top instance, For audience. its of size the of because tool communicational “side incidental o effort, educational conscious a be can information health medical of communication Foundation, the to According methods. different the of impacts the studies also and shows Found information health and medical incorporate that shows television of potentials infotainment and edutainment of impact the about evidence representative and hard of reception the medical narratives: to regarding studies reception further requires genre the that concluded socially a as States United the presented and many, of experiences operas. soap in represented was that reality American different completely a was it and patients, the of world the hospital, county li the through screen television foundedthe on appeared people homeless and unemployed state a is hospital fictional presented the Since to ta wrs o noprt hat msae it mda n pplr television popular and media into messages health incorporate to works that ation atclry ic vees ey evl o tlvso fr hi medical perception further So their for television on heavily rely knowledge.” viewers since particularly research, further needs narratives illness and health of reception The (…) prevalent. spectators’ to p attention, contribute urgent needs illness thus knowledge and health of representations televised “How

E.R prryd n mrc wee oet, ilne n ecuin r daily are exclusion and violence poverty, where America an portrayed . - effect” of the storyline. Their data present that television is still a dominant a still is television that present data Their storyline. the of effect”

(Da vin 2003, pp. vin 2003, studies are needed, but in the other hand, it is not easy to get get to easy not is it hand, other the in but needed, are studies 675)

articularly as the medium is increasingly increasingly is medium the as articularly te eut f their of result the s -

unequal country. Davin Davin country. unequal according to the Kaiser Kaiser the to according Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s fe stories of of stories fe Grey’s Grey’s

r an an r is a a is CEU eTD Collection Link: genet 7 Link: 6 the about information more find to try to show the by encouraged were th asked whileother the Internet, used ofthem issues: some represented respondents the of 13% income. ac the in believe many and viewers), regular the of (45% show the from health and medicine about information new learned have they that viewerssay many the analysis to According method. survey by the on audience effect evaluate its to inorder plot 5 Hazell Janson Allie Dr. expert genetics the to th according line but technology, story this towards genetics awareness the a enhances include dramas medical contemporary the of many instance, to produce medical reliable series enhancesreliability ofthe content. the the Otherwise, accurate. but laypeople, entirely. partly effortpresentedcasesoftenor The basedonreal stories medical for believable only not are that series create to contentmedical of creators the powerful tostrengthen opportunity engagement theaudience’s content. withthe perso or the with exciting content medical the ambiguous connect often creators the finally, and popularity; and skills professional real; almost as characters the the because tool th in invested emotionally communicational and with engaged is audience powerful a is it and information medical and health Anatomy

Gever, John: Gever, Malamut, Melissa: Melissa: Malamut, The summary of the foundation’s foundation’s the of summary The ic testing storyline believable.” believable.” storyline testing ic http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/04/greys http://www.bostonmagazine.com/health/blog/2013/10/03/science ept o ti efr t mk acrt sos te lt mgt e ilaig For misleading. be might plots the shows, accurate make to effort this of Despite instance, for but documentaries, not are series these while that note to important is It

ae td shows study case

„ Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s E.R. 6

thus the creators collaborate with real life practitioners and expertise in orderin expertise practitionersand reallife collaboratethe creatorswith thus “ The Science Behind Grey’s Anatomy: Grey’s Behind Science The

and

curacy of the information especially the younger viewers and those who have lower have who those and viewers younger the especially information the of curacy h supervised who Grey’s Anato Grey’s

and other TV doctors skirt bioethical issues bioethical skirt doctors TV other and 5 etranet eeiin a a eomu ptnil o serve to potential enormous an has television entertainment ,

trial: the creators of creators the trial: Boston Boston

top actors strengthen the effect and messages by their their by messages and effect the strengthen actors top Magazine my rys Anatomy’s Grey’s

turn serious attention on the accuracy of the series’ series’ the of accuracy the on attention serious turn - nal development of the character and in this is a is this in and character the of development nal anatomy , 2013. , 33 Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

How Harvard’s Ting Wu made Dr. Meredith Grey’s Meredith Dr. made Wu Ting Harvard’s How -

tv - doctors e story; usually the the usually story; e

- eir practitioner. practitioner. eir eeis line genetics behind - skirt

placed a formerly selected story selected formerly a placed ”. ”. - bioethical - KEVIN MD. KEVIN greys - anatomy/

- - issues.html

misrepresentations audience

2010

(June, 2014) (June, of the creators thecreators of

(June, 2014) 2014) (June,

regard

in the the in

at at s -

CEU eTD Collection (June, 2009. 8 contemporary ofposthuma questions discussing and about learning to forum effective an provide series these that argue I because important is perspectives such of examination The audience. the for engaging emotionally languag and narrative a use genre popular this of communication. scientific traditional the beyond important become dramas medical as just science, of awareness public enhance to ways alternative thus medicine, in interested introduce above the as hand other the In medicine. in developments the of accounts specialist read to trained or interested not are they have or sources, these to not access might they since audience general the for available not are forums professional m genre. because the important particularly of are potentials dramas Medical these interpret that articles and studies case with statement this are series these and to capacity a have Thus, medicalare nearly dramasentirely never ac 45 the and interesting, stay flow, to has line story the because properly issues medical certain cover consequences negative have might

Dr. Allie Janson Hazell Janson Allie Dr.

2014) - Link: 50 minutes long time limit of the episodes influence the way how things are presented. presented. are things how way the influence episodes the of limit time long minutes 50 dramas medical that argued I sources media and texts academic using by part this In

http://thednaexchange.com/2009/10/07/misrepresentation

inform people about contemporary medical questions and developments; developments; and questions medical contemporary about people inform effective platforms to shape awareness about medical issues. I reinforced I issues. medical about awareness shape to platforms effective

: „ Misrepresentation

8 . Moreover, the series format does not mak not does format series the Moreover, . n embodiment, medical biotechnologyand bioethics.

Genetics 34

on curate.

TV: e that is cognitively approachable and and approachable cognitively is that e

dcl oras rprs sophisticate reports, journals, edical Harmless

- of - genetics or

Harmful? - studies show, they are they show, studies on - tv ”

- The harmless e it possible to possible it e

DNA - or

Exchange, Products - harmful/

CEU eTD Collection Health Link: 2009. 10 Link: 9 fast sensationalistic, a in medicine presents television that emphasize tes necessary than more order regularly who House, Dr. like physicians fictional by established model the follow to want patients concluded, research the as and care,health and medical real about expectations and perceptions viewers’ influencethe life real in recommended are that practices those from far is that care health to approach expensive and aggressive an portray dramas Medical underrepresented. often are However, the encourage series theviewers to practices these of effects side the but treatments; and drugs high of accounts newest the represent series the because costs, practitioners. and institutions medical medicine, of perception audience’s the on effect genre’s the on focus 3.4.

Weaver, Cristopher: „Do TV medical shows provoke higher health costs?” health costs?” higher provoke shows medical TV „Do Cristopher: Weaver,

Gutierrez

http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/entertainment/2009/sept/Do http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/09/01/74714/do

- Care treatments their illnesses.” for doct from suggestions resist might patients some so lines, story good for make doesn’t watching” “watchful as such Advice TV. on As particular a by coverage media drama’s medical of analysis the continues section This R

“Yet some analysts suggest that what patients really want is a medicine as portrayed as medicine a is want really patients what that suggest analysts some “Yet eal life effects eal life effects - - Folch, Expectations.h the article of The Cristopher Weaver Cristopher The of article the

Anita : “ :

Do Medical Dramas Skew Patients’ Health Care Expectations? Care Health Patients’ Dramas Skew Medical Do tml

(June, 2014) (June,

(Weaver: 2009) ask forask thelatest improvements: medical 35 -

tv 9

- address 10 medical Sre like Series .

- es shows r t fro nesv tss and tests intensive forgo to ors , medica , - Medical ts and examinations. The article The examinations. and ts - - McClatchy DC, DC, McClatchy provoke tech medicine, latest devices, latest medicine, tech House - Dramas l shows drive up medical up drive shows l - paced way, the effort of of effort the way, paced - higher.html

and - ” Skew Finding Dulcinea Finding 2009. Grey’s - Patients

(June, 2014) (June,

Anatomy

CEU eTD Collection Link: 12 11 According BrianQuick’s tothe Professor study physicians: with experiences life 3.5. recently media likeFacebookand social most and forums blogs, via other each with communicate they relatives: with series the about M t of discussions the in instance for manifested that attitude participatory and of med accuracy toward requirements the of fa the aware and infotainment are creators the that shows activity This show. the in represented were that cases important socially or contradictory, interesting, File Case Medical called blog official of Creators practices. and questions cases, certain discuss to people’s expectations towards real life doctors. with back cases hopeless turns semi a creates reliability and accuracy

Hans Link: edical dramas have an important life important an have dramas edical

http://prospectivedoctor.com/articles/item/37 , http://abc.go.com/shows/greys ical cases. Daniel: real personal, people’s despite even doctors, of perceptions public impacts Television Portr C viewers the for platform a up set but issues medical represent only not series Medical ran mut f h adec nt ny osm mdcl rms u cry n a on carry but dramas medical consume only not audience the of amount ertain

ayal ofthepractitioners ayal “ Grey's Anatomy's Real World Effect” Anatomy's Real World Grey's

ct that the audience is interested in thorough, professional explanation explanation professional thorough, in interested is audience the that ct

- anatomy/news/medical hnmnl ue, id us n invtos ht raise that innovations and outs find cures, phenomenal h adec wns otr lk te V practitioners. TV the like doctors wants audience the 11

- beyond the television the beyond

fictional world of health of world fictional

where they display proper information about the most the about information proper display they where Twitter.

- greys 36 , Prospective Doctor, Prospective 12

anatomys

on the - case

- - real real file

- - world life effectslife of screen; Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

2012 - care practitioners who often often who practitioners care - effect

t he viewers not only talk talk only not viewers he

(June, 2014) (June, he represe he Grey’s Anatomy

estab

nted issues. issues. nted lished an lished :

CEU eTD Collection perceptions Link: & Media Broadcasting of Electronic Journal 13 in the interest ofthepatients: act they conclude authors the as but fallible, more as portrayed struggles, physicians Today, dilemmas. life private and professional their to attention turn products more later are realistic, physicians television the today changed, has picture idealized This authorities. Kildare (1989) doctors. fictional of portrayals providers and patients m that concluded Quick thus did, it reality,portrayed show the that believed show the of fans Surveyed

Quick, Brian: “ Brian: Quick,

ER promotes a view of physicians as selfless heroes acting in the best interest of their of interest best the in acting heroes selfless as physicians of view a promotes ER physicians. fictional of world private and internal the on extent great effectiveandquick, patients, decision to devotion supreme skills, medical perfect near display who doctors see only longer no the in shift noticeable a is there literature, scholarly the to according However, astheir doctors doctorsworld tobecourageous real perceive to were they likely more the credible, as show the perceive to were they a show the perceive to were they likely more the watched, viewers episodes more the (…) show TV popular the on portrayed ones the real that believe they more the show, the watch people more “The which concluded that the early medical shows’ formula such as such formula shows’ medical early the that concluded which

“The idealism of past television doctors is tempered by a healthy dose of realism. We realism. of dose healthy a by tempered is doctors television past of idealism “The rsne a oiie mg o pyiin wo ee otae a biomedical as portrayed were who physicians of image positive a presented

(June, 2014) (June, http://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1 T he Effects of Viewing Grey's Anatomy on Perceptions Perceptions on Anatomy Grey's Viewing of Effects he

13 .

Strauman and Goodier reflect on a study of of study a on reflect Goodier and Strauman ,

Vol. 53, No. 1, 2009. 2009. No. 1, 53, Vol. edia influence the relationship between healthcare healthcare between relationship the influence edia 37 - - making. The new doctor shows also focus t focus alsoshows doctor new The making.

197233665/the .”

s credible, and then the more likely more the then and credible, s ( Hans, 2012) - effects of Doctors and Patient Satisfaction Patient and Doctors of - of or at least that they hoped hoped they that least at or - viewing

- Ben Casey Ben life doctors are like like are doctors life - grey oeh Turow Joseph (…) - s - anatomy

Although Although

and and and - Dr. o ao on ” -

CEU eTD Collection the role of r about think people how influencerepresented is transformation posthuman of processes the in real on perception audience’s Important series. the to according physicians the of practices and projects research innovatory the through existence to comes technologies medical modern by constructed that embodiment posthuman because thesis, the and reflections for platforms are series medical discussions. that underlines it and audience the of attitudes participatory the reinforce judgments and answers These reflections. moral make t invite to likely dilemmas ethical vexing and norm, as attitudes represented the take might professionals and patients documentaries, not are series these if even him, to serio with deal frequently doctors fictional the that clarifies and rights patient’s and education medical about questions practices, clinical general on focuses He dramas. medical within behavior J bioethics, of the perspective From well. as incorrect sometimes but fallible, only not are doctors fictional new the perception. positive audience the in role important have to seem re in doctors of kinds these have to wish viewers the predecessors, their than fallible more and idealized less are doctors fictional today’s Even The portrayal of the fictional doctors is partic is doctors fictional the of portrayal The 2008, and patients.” each mistaken, other,staff, anduncaring toward uncertain, are physicians which in lines story offers also show the patients, us ethical dilemmas, probably more often than real life practitioners do. According According do. practitioners life real than often more probably dilemmas, ethical us eal

pp. 128. - life practitioners in this activity. inthis life practitioners )

h Gever ohn - life practitioners. Thus, the way fictional doctors’ involvement doctors’ fictional way the Thus, practitioners. life y a I icse aoe fcinl otr efc the effect doctors fictional above, discussed I as ly,

(2010) 38

xmns ifrn frs f unprofessional of forms different examines al - life, and courage and innovatory attitudes innovatory and courage and life, ularly important from the perspective of of perspective the from important ularly But as Turow’s study show, show, study Turow’s as But (Strauman and Goodier e uine to audience he racist, CEU eTD Collection Link: 14 kind ofinfotainment potential. medica in source innovations. medical posthuman make to aim that projects research medical or embodiment, medical posthuman of practices const body posthumanist in involved and interested more be will series these with engaged are who practitioners the of generation new the whether consider to important is it So research. medical and embodiment like dramas medical current role The an series by these inspired are more jargon.Others appropriate entirely practicesor notice the not they or reality, the in exists that milieu medical different radically a represent these because pre forums and blogs as and screen, the of outside life have dramas medical Again, practitioners. of generation forthcoming the

Kwong d see the fictional doctors as role models. As Wilson Kwong’sd seefictionalasrole models.article doctors the inhis AsWilson writes http://healthydebate.ca/opinions/tv 2013 cha fictional the to attachment of form some develop to bound are you years, of number a for regularly show a watch you When level. emotional an on students with connect to ability their from come to seems general primetime the into right fall to tend students “…medical question the on elaborate to important is Furthermore,it , - Wilson model aspect is important, because as the next chapter presents, practitioners of of practitioners presents, chapter next the as because important, is aspect model , pp.1. :

“ TV medical dramas: pure entertainment or a useful teaching tool?” tool?” useful a teaching or entertainment pure dramas: medical TV l and health education strengthen the argument that these series have some have series these that argument the strengthen education health and l

medical )

uto o nt Te mgt e oe nae wt technologies, with engaged more be might They not. or ruction

dramas Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

The fact that medical dramas have been used as a teaching a as used been have dramas medical that fact The - medical . The . sent, there are medical students, who criticize the dramas the criticize who students, medical are there sent,

- appeal of using medical dramas as a teaching tool teaching a as dramas medical using of appeal dramas

39 highly engaged with processes of posthumanist of processes with engaged highly -

useful atr big eitd n screen.” on depicted being racters - teaching - tool

how do medical dramas effect effect dramas medical do how

( June, 2014) June,

targeted Healthy Debate Healthy

demographic 14

: (K , 2013. ,

wong

CEU eTD Collection I thechapterswhy thesis. in inthis forefront question thatfollow this is this human negotiations, such for space post a provide dramas of medical how on threat research scholarly no or value the as such issue t in representations through negotiated being are transformations particular a how at look to sense makes it series dramas medical of effects and medical potentials presented the of Because posthumanism, bioethics. of representation dramas’ medical examines that analysis content the for basement the provide chaptersprevious the in weredescribed that embodiment. and world the changes technologies such how way the interest oftheaudience. up keep to help also issues represented the with together comes that engagement personal and cause that cloning or the within ambiguity and excitement mapping genetic like issues emerging represent to intend dramas medical of creators Moreover, culture. popular of field the in circulating are embodiment to important is It embodiment. posthuman and technologies medical emerging of questions about recently most and issues, medical about laypeople and professionals scholars, between gap informational an filling are series these of fu forplatforms provide and questions medicalabout people inform One of the main questions of the thesis is the way how way the is thesis the of questions main the of One to potential infotainment have dramas medical that argued have I chapter this In

audience. These issues together with the strong feelings feelings strong the with together issues These audience. 40

realize that various concepts of posthuman posthuman of concepts various that realize hese series. Thus far, there is there far, Thus series. hese eia rms pres dramas medical The theoretical approaches theoretical The rther discussions. Creators discussions. rther

ehooy and technology, ent the ent CEU eTD Collection proj research the of some Furthermore, posthuman. the and human the between boundary the about and machines, and human the between division s the Currently, prosthetics. 3 mapping, episodes newest more getting been has topic a medical as research recently, but trials, their with boundaries scientific the challenge to tried always of the since series, the controversies asgenerate Two thatwereanxieties well. presented inChapter excitementand by mediated or problematized ho explained, way are the scenarios influenced and future posthumanist cases a selected discourage the or whether encourage discusses analysis The embodiment. posthuman regarding medical andemerging posthumanism enhancep dramas presentissuesthe of exa selected the that argue I medicine. of understanding and perception public’s the on effect significant a have dramas medical that show Three Chapter in presented t in presented are embodiment posthuman of approaches different the how discusses and series, drama medical two these in represented are posthumanism of concepts the how examples e artvs Fr ntne te asr onains ae td ad h atce ta were that articles the and study case Foundation’s Kaiser the instance, For narratives. he rys Anatomy Grey’s This chapter mostly builds on those cases that appeare that cases those on builds mostly chapter This of lines story analyses chapter This - ogn rnig atfca cntuto o ogn ad thought and organs of construction artificial printing, organ D ects explicitly clarified that they aim to change the meaning of human and the and human of meaning the change to aim they that clarified explicitly ects

present emerging contemporary questions of medicine like genetics, brain brain genetics, like medicine of questions contemporary emerging present wih ee ie bten 2012 between aired were which , eries raises academically and socially relevant questions about the about questions relevant socially and academically raises eries CONTENT ANALYSIS CHAPTER Grey’s Anatomy’s Grey’s

attention in the script than before. Moreover, before. than script the in attention 41

rys Anatomy Grey’s

FOUR - 1014.

physicians who lead the ongoing ongoing the lead who physicians rciinr o ti sre have series this of Practitioners

d in the ninth and tenth seasons seasons tenth and ninth the in d

and w the technologically technologically the w E.R. mples reinforce that that reinforce mples

ublic’s awareness n re t give to order in - controlled controlled

the

CEU eTD Collection these whether are questions main The audience. the for acceptable even or understandable more technologies crossings boundary the and transformation, body medical embodiment, and enhancement bodily of potential a or body, human the for replacement and correction provide that practices of set a as instance, for biomedicine: of aims main the portray series these how examining worth why reasons the and research the of outcomes expected and goals main the names projects research the of introduction The technologies. these by entailed concerns bioethical and biotechnology, medical of application the from different be might series posthumanist two the of messages and narratives the result, a As activity practitioner’s the of type the and happen research make to opportunities foundational the result, a As hospital. Harper wealthy Grey the hospitals: of types different present series the moreover, comparison, a for point a provides series two the between difference time the instance, For absence. the behind reasons possible the examine I so, if issue; given Anatomy Grey’s and theethicaldiscourses ofbiomedicalization. about posthumanism dilemmas on reflect cases represented the how way the evaluate to transhumanist; rather or posthumanist are aims these whether discuss to worth also is It biotechnology. medical human to connected are that approaches posthumanist those on reflect projects the research of aims The ideas. posthumanist significant promote also but biotechnologies human medical emerging present only not creators the that argue I why is This medicine. of face The analyzed storylines present various issues of p of issues various present storylines analyzed The of narratives the compare I possible, it makes lines story the of similarity the Where

medical improvements andtransformation. bodily -

Avery Foundation; while the while Foundation; Avery and E.R.

are In some cases it is not possible, because possible, not is it cases some In perfection. I analyze the narratives that make posthuman posthuman make that narratives the analyze I perfection.

different,

just like their understanding of the aims of medicine. medicine. of aims the of understanding their like just 42 E.R -

la Me Sloan eti dcos ae at n hs. t s also is It these. in part take doctors certain .’s Cook County General is a state a is General County Cook .’s morial Hospital is owned by the the by owned is Hospital morial osthumanist embodiment resulting embodiment osthumanist

E.R.

did n did ot represent the the represent ot

the academic the regarding - funded funded CEU eTD Collection diff actors, nonhuman and human species, between distinction less is there world posthuman a in purity: human thus transplantation technologies, artificial with replaced be can organs and organs, or tissues human and animal tissue and nerve Organ, symbiosis. and hybridity entail a and technologies; and beings different of 4 4.1. projects orderthe processtransformation. in topresent ofposthuman research the in part take who doctors fictional those of motivations the examines part last be might that body human the of future and structure inner the on elaborates third the and body, the of robotizations the on focuses second the entity, hybrid a as posthuman the of representation futuristic, pacifying orenhancing anxieties? uncertainties and well a humanist traditional values with content futuristic posthumanist, mixing creators the Are body. human boundariesthe and of capacity medicallimits thesethe presentdramas how and not, or series arethea pushing .1.1. Transplantation erent levels. (Hogle (Hogle levels. erent Transplantation and organ donation supports the idea that posthuman bodies are mixtures are bodies posthuman that idea the supports donation organ and Transplantation

- and standpoints about human embodiment, or are these two approaches represented in in represented approaches two these are or embodiment, human about standpoints and aacd n cery eaae wy Ae h gvn ersnain cnevtv or conservative representations given the Are way? separated clearly and balanced The incl analysis The

more predictable and controllable by the application of medical technologies. The The technologies. medical of application the by controllable and predictable more posthuman as a hybrid entity hybrid asa posthuman instead, there is a symbiosis between humans, animals, and machi and animals, humans, between symbiosis a is there instead,

presents two types of boundary crossing. These practices signal the end of types signal practices the These end two ofboundarycrossing. presents udience’s cognitive and moral boundaries to understand posthumanismcognitive and boundariesudience’s moral tounderstand

2007 ds h floig sus te is sbhpe eaie the examines subchapter first the issues: following the udes , pp. 854) Donation between humans is an encouraged medical medical encouraged an is humans between Donation 854) s a significant practice of biomedicalization these biomedicalization of practice significant a s 43

transplantation imply the usage of of usage the imply transplantation

n es on es CEU eTD Collection 15 world a of hand injured the repair to possible is it that learns audience the body: the of structure inner the and hig transplantations, organ Beyond cases. heart of range wide a through seasons the and during represented were transplantations surgeries Cardio cases. challenging transplantations complicated, out sort team surgeon se the of all Nearly embodiment: posthumancreates mixed bodies. donation how is this life: saved the of part a becomes or body, another in live to starts person dead the donation after said, often is it As organs. the get who those for precious are organs perso dead the for worthless are organs summary, In 884). a symbolic, no have that entities mechanical are organs transplanted; be to organs their contribute should citizens thus waste to go organs donated She bodies. hybrid of concept the reinforces it Lock, to according and countries, many in practice

Season 9: E Season9: hlights that transplantation not only save lives, but also repairs the function of the limbs limbs the of function the repairs also but lives, save only not transplantation that hlights 3. 2. 1. highlights the common assumption in the debates of organ shortage, for i for shortage, organ of debates the in assumption common the highlights

Creation of by artificial organs 3 using The organsanimal humanschallenge transplantationand into tissues ofboundaries the Organboundaries beings donation blurstheand between turnsthebody human a into of cases transplantation The between species; mixture ofdifferent bodies; betweenand nature machine, human and technology. pisode 9: „ 9: pisode

r te eta tpc o te eis rm h bgnig Mn tps of types Many beginning. the from series the of topics central the are - ls sren hog nre transplantation nerve through surgeon class ries physicians are transplantation specialists: the cardio and the general the and cardio the specialists: transplantation are physicians ries Run baby, run” baby, Run

Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

portrayed nerve portrayed 44 - D organ printing questions the division questionstheD organprinting division

represent different aspects of posthuman posthuman of aspects different represent ffective meaning or value (Lock 2007, (Lock value or meaning ffective

and face transplantation too, which too, transplantation face and

15 ad h fml, u donated but family, the and n and n dmn srey six surgery domino a in nstance, non nstance, -

CEU eTD Collection series: the anatomy/news/medical of website 17 official the on 16 case the anatomy/news/medical of Descriptions people’s influence might attitudes toward organ dona representations these medicine, about perception audience’s the affect dramas medical Since is. donation organ about people convincing of limit ethical Dr. of case the In are. order the change that practices medical acceptable the what and list transplantation the in decide place people’s about to right the has who discussing worth is it Thus, surgery. the to agrees she blood” liver her from part a donate to refuses she First situation. emergency an is surgery the and donor a be can who member family only the is Meredith different. is type blood their because donor suitable a not is Grey Dr. daughter, younger Her transplantation. liver needed five was she when her left who father, Grey’s Meredith Dr. Four, Season In surgery. the before dies he end, the in but worse, patient the place and faster process transplantation the make To disease. heart his of dying was who patient her with love in fell Stevens Izzie Dr. Two Season in practitioner: a to connected is issues private the through portrayed usually m Moreover, body. the of ownership the about instance for questions, bioethical ambiguous p the of many and transplantation and donation organ different of members the families between donation cross through kidney new a get can people

Season 5: Episode 5: „ 5: Episode Season5: any of these cases were represented in an emotional way and transplantation narratives were transplantation andway emotional an representedin were cases anythese of ecitos f h cs o te fiil est o te series: the of website official the on case the of Descriptions These stories present the variability of posthuman embodiment through the usage of of usage the through embodiment posthuman of variability the present stories These 16 .

owr o te rnpat it D. tvn mks h ptets condition patient’s the makes Stevens Dr. list, transplant the on forward - - case case There is no I in team” in I a no is There

- - file/medical file/medical tion andtion transplantation. 17 bt fe hr itrs emotional sister’s her after but , - - case case - - file file ie o te rciinr. n o te igs ethical biggest the of One practitioners. the of lives

Grey and her sister it is worth wondering where the the where wondering worth is it sister her and Grey - -

604 909 - - 45 partial nerve

- - transplant liver

- donation eetd rnpatto css raise cases transplantation resented

ruet bu te “shared the about argument http://abc.go.com/shows/greys http://abc.go.com/shows/greys

Lexie - -

CEU eTD Collection http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karen http://www.3dsystems.com/blog/2013/11/3d http://cubify.com/blog/3d 18 printing 4 a better option. of help the with kidneys which organ, dysfunctionalfunctioning a of transplantation the machines; with live to capable not are people represents: of surgery transplantation kidney domino the what exactly is This technolomachine. external an and human of connectedness continuous the than option better a is organ donor a of usage the So often. more and more dialyses needs patient huma the passes, time the worsens, condition organ’s the asbecause becomesstronger machine the to connectedness as and machine, a on depends patient the because quality life bad a provides it moreover, completely, problem the solve cannot practice this but dialysis, with live can people that implicates line o dysfunctional story The one. dysfunctional the replace to him for organ donor suitable a find to was difficulty only The surgery. routine a as portrayed functioning. stopped kidney other his because transplantation kidney the needs he so Fifteen injured, Season In seriously it. remove is to have kidney surgeons Carter’s Dr. and survive not does intern The knife. at problems mental with patient a Six, Season in example from .1.2. Three

Me dia coverage of the technology’ s ofthe technology’ coverage dia In the tenth season of of season tenth the In of examination the After 18

project. She works on it together with surgical intern Dr. Shane Ross Shane Dr. intern surgical with together it on works She project. - dimensional organprinting dimensional E.R. rgans for a limited amount of time through the application of technologies like technologies of application the throughtime of amount limited a for rgans

that also presents transplantation through the life story of a main character:of a main story presents through thelife also transplantation that

- systems - cubex

rys Anatomy, Grey’s - fratti/greys debut in in debut

- rys Anatomy’s Grey’s This episode was screened in 2010, and transplantation was transplantation and 2010, in screened was episode This printer - systems Grey’s Anatomy Anatomy Grey’s - debuts - anat

- cubex omy 46 - on

- - 3 a starts Cristina Yang Dr. recap - greys tacks Dr. John Carter and his intern with a with intern his and Carter John Dr. tacks printer

rnpatto nraie, poie an provide I narratives, transplantation (June, 2014) (June, - - forki_b_4239756.html anatomy/ - debuts

artificially mixes human bodies is is bodies human mixes artificially -

greys

- anatomy

gy like a dialysis dialysis a like gy Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s - hat model heart D , and tries the tries and , n’s

CEU eTD Collection 21 20 19 human bodies by existingtechnologies. using rep only could she which in position a in be to refuses Yang Dr. thus improvement, this support not does job other The printing. organ on research her through embodiment human offer the accepts Grey the in perspective research a have not does she Foundation, Harper the lost she Since opportunity. research aim, which becomesachievab organ real the replacing of capable is which heart, artificial forty has which sheget all didnot after Harper prestigious the to nominated was she this for and method own her up transplanted he real, the reject will body the whether see to body patient’s the in it placed then heart; certain donor a of characteristics the mirrors that model heart dimensional three a printed Yang organ. replacement artificial a professional construct to intention the with up ended she and research her started Yang Dr. where is This not. or organ donated the receives that body the within function will organ transplanted the of success h the Models predictable. these, more of becomes usage surgery transplantation the through and organs, model produce to able are printers these Moreover, organ. the replaces entirely that migh model heart a it construct artificially suggests plot the as because the machine crosses and even human and of boundaries challenges that practice promising a as represented is technology patient. young a on first model

Season 10: Season10: Season10: Season10 Two episodes later, Dr. Yang visits a futuristic l futuristic a visits Yang Dr. later, episodes Two - nine 3 nine :

Episode 22: 22: Episode 20: Episode 8: Episode art or not. Both the trial and the transplantation were successful. Dr. Yang built Yang Dr. built were transplantation successful. and the trial Both the ornot. art - . This decision implicates her professional intention is to change the cores of cores the change to is intention professional her implicates decision This . D printers, and one of these might make it possible for her to print a beating a print to her for possible it make might these of one and printers, D „Two against one” „Twoagainst

„ it „Go alone” "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together" Back Getting Never Ever Are "We 20 le because the head of theCardiac a Surgery her theheadle because joband offers

h bo rnig f ise ad ras y sn 3 using by organs and tissues of printing bio The After realizing the potentials of the technology, Dr. Dr. technology, the of potentials the realizing After 47

- Avery award and the support of the the of support the and award Avery aboratory of a hospital in Zurich that that Zurich in hospital a of aboratory

21 . This is her new professional new her is This . l t dtrie hte the whether determine to elp - Sloan Memorial, thus she thus Memorial, Sloan b psil to possible be t - Avery Award, Avery air air - D CEU eTD Collection 24 23 22 thought medical and limbs New artificial machines. like technologies, and human the between connection close the and embodiment 4.2. motor orcentre body. the human of the as considered is which heart, the level: high extremely this on starts technologies artificial and importance of order certainMor surgery. of fields the between hierarchy a implicates which trial, Yang’s Dr. forward put they three organs: artificial produce to try physicians how presentation scientific interdisciplinary for example good a is collaboration it and forward, step to helps which with cooperate to starts and optimism, her lose not does Grey Dr. surgery. 3 believ 3 the like it, to direction new a add and research unfinished her continue to decided Grey Dr. surgeon. a with trial the starts Grey life new, build to aims which research,modeling organ an leadsGrey, who -

Season 10: Episode 12 Episode Season10: 11 Episode Season10: 8: Episode Season10; pitd otl en no sheep a into vein portal printed D

- dimensional printer, the board had to prioritize between the two research projects and and projects research two the between prioritize to had board the printer, dimensional es whena thattheychangeadmits it they ofmedicinetogether. will theface operate She h rbtzto o te oy lo rsns th presents also body the of robotization The body ofthe Robotization 3 the of line story other The - D printing D 24 . The importance of this case from a posthumanist perspective is not only the only not is perspective posthumanist a from case this of importance The : on :“Man „Two Against One” „TwoAgainst 22 “Get up, stand up” stand “Get up,

. She works together with surgical intern Dr. Stephanie Edwards who Edwards Stephanie Dr. intern surgical with together works She .

liver. The core idea comes from her mother who was a world a was who mother her from comes idea core The liver.

theMoon”

- D printer is connected to general surgeon Dr. Meredith Dr. surgeon general to connected is printer D

Te ra i nt ucsfl te hp is fe the after dies ship the successful; not is trial The . eover, the hybridization of the human body with body human the of hybridization the eover, 48 -

otold rshtc, hc ae rsl of result a are which prosthetics, controlled hbi caatrsis f posthuman of characteristics hybrid e

since the hospital has only one one only has hospital the since - saving organs. Dr. Dr. saving organs.

a bioengineer, bioengineer, a - class CEU eTD Collection wiWe are. we who of map the is It all. at random not is choose it But will. and own act our against to seemingly Sometimes us behave. tells and connections of system This done. been has damage some means usually it broken, is connec Every matters. connection every that know we But go. they deep how reach, a for designed is do. It pattern. specific a in everyth happen determine connections to These function. have connections these All them. about random nothing Billions “ 25 joins she limbs, artificial improved create to order In cases. prosthetization different with lim and bones rebuilding is specialty Her cartilage. regenerative of idea the with studyher of focus the extended she and goal original the wasprosthetics of improvement move for responsible are that body the of their nerves injured with the replacing are movement thoughts thus thoughts, control and initiate to patients injured seriously and paralyzed for thought improved t by moved build limbs artificial to possible it make will study mapping this. for capacity the have doctors change to was prosthetics controlled injured ormalfunctioning “natural” body parts. ca many in since arguments, prosthetization contra vs. pro their and amputation toward attitudes of narratives amputation improve the on focuses it and Ten Season in place takes which Torres, Callie Dr. Surgeon Orthopedic and Shepherd more perfect bodies. studies mapping brain Researchers are currently working on a map of the human brain. It may be the most complex map ever created. ever map complex most the be may It brain. human the of map a on working currently are Researchers

Season 10; Episode 6: 6: Episode Season10; ses, amputation and artificial limbs are presented as better choices and solutions than the the than solutions and choices better as presented are limbs artificial and amputation ses,

Every action we take. (…) take. we action Every ll work to understand ourselves, solve the puzzle. How all the connections work and all the pieces fit.” pieces the all and work connections the all How puzzle. the ourselves, solve understand to work ll ments. When Orthopedic Surgeon Callie Torres joined the brain mapping research, the the research, mapping brain the joined Torres Callie Surgeon Orthopedic When ments.

of neurons making trillions of connections. At first glance, they seem completely random. But there's But random. completely seem they glance, first At connections. of trillions making neurons of Dr. Shepherd admitted that his goal with the brain mapping study and thought thought and study mapping brain the with goal his that admitted Shepherd Dr. of research the examine I part this In „Map You” „Map of

ugs ta bdl l bodily that suggest et f thought of ment Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

We are just starting to learn the extent of the brain's connections. How far they they far How connections. brain's the of extent the learn to starting just are We he thoughts of the user. This kind of prosthetics will give a chance chance a give will prosthetics of kind This user. the of thoughts he

Dr. Shepherd’s opening and ending monologue: ending and opening Shepherd’s Dr. 25 the meaning of human, and this approach clarifies that that clarifies approach this and human, of meaning the

ing about us. What we love, what we hate, what we say, what we what say, we what hate, we what love, we What us. about ing codn t D. hped te eut f i brain his of result the Shepherd, Dr. to According

- and controlled prosthetics. The chapter discusses the the discusses chapter The prosthetics. controlled 49 imits can be extended, and technology makes makes technology and extended, be can imits E.R

. generally, the series’ positive and negative and positive series’ the generally, . rys Anatomy’s Grey’s

tion is crucial. And when one when And crucial. is tion - erlgs D. Derek Dr. Neurologist otold prosthetics: controlled

bs, and she deals she and bs,

CEU eTD Collection Arizona Callie Arizona Callie score! the let's even sawand bone a grab I'll and leg your out Great! Stick warriorwounds, the honor, of badge Arizona 28 27 26 limb, injured an with life the or one, artificial an with prosthetization and limb dysfunctional she amputated; be to want not does desperately leg.wants her own Robbins Dr. all, Despite it. of ability functional the predict can nobody and hurt always will it again, same the be never will leg The process. pro The arguments. contra emotional pro rational gets audience the line story this Through decision. radical sudden, a make to had Torres Dr. finally but amputation the refused had she Earlier, infection. an of because consciousness her lost Robbins after off leg the cut to surgeons final the seas eighth the of episode in crash plane a in leg her lost Robbins Arizona Dr. wife her specialization: her with engaged more her makes that story life private a has who Torres, Dr. Especially abilities. the find to aim practitioners the and amputated research and beby thatshould controlled supported them. indica research the But research. the in interest its expresses House White States United the the President from of call receivesa Shepherd sensors. it,Dr. After successful is patient first the though the of sensors the test they and Shepherd

Season 9: Episode 24: Episode Season9: 2: Episode Season9: 12: Episode Season10: : :

To save your life your save To

It always comes back to the leg… the to back comes always It : : the cred, street the wanted You plane! fricking the on weren't You died." almost you Mark; lost "I : This story invites the audi the invites story This Anatomy Grey’s

You didn't lose anything! I did, did!I I did, lose anything! didn't You

I trusted you more than anything…more than anyone in my life. And you decided to cut cut off.. to decided you And life. my in anyone than anything…more more than you trusted I ting what policy makers see as valuable, original, and promising medical promising and original, valuable, as see makers policy what ting “Remember the time” the “Remember ! ”

Perfect Storm Perfect “Get up, stand up” stand “Get up,

presents many cases in which the patients become paralyzed or or paralyzed become patients the which in cases many presents on

: and Dr. Robbins blamed her because she gave permit to the other the to permit gave she because her blamed Robbins Dr. and

the paralyzed the 28

” ence to think about the choice between the amputation of a of amputation the between choice the about think to ence

ruet s o vi ifcin and infections avoid to is argument wom 50

- controlled prosthetic together. The trial on on trial The together. prosthetic controlled et a t rpae h msig ib or limbs missing the replace to way best

manages to move her fingers by using the the using by fingers her move to manages they are they

only interested in his part of part his in interested only - amputation arguments and and arguments amputation h ln healing long the 26

and the 27

CEU eTD Collection lear to time takes it admits She amputation The personality. her after it. being human differenta be to seems she too; personalityand embodiment changesher in difference huge a makes amputation the but person Rob Arizona engaged. and interested is receiver the if mediated successfully more be can creators the of messages The episodes. for appear only who patients with than them with engaged more emotionally is audience the because through presented are dilemmas prosthetization and amputation that argue I stories. emotional by mediated are cases the but enhancement, or replacement that state thinkers transhumanist many if transformations need thorough prelimi even perfection, bodily in belief strong a is there notions these behind since body the of robotization the and technology toward Chapter attitudes in described I As too. replaceable are limbs but organs, only not and real, entirely be to have not does body the life complete a live seems,according to it As embodiment. conceptsof transhumanist conta bodies human original or injured than better function that bodies prosthetics possible is and that it tolive assureshim aamputee. complete as life an Robbins Dr. when only convinced becomes father The dysfunctions. andpain the of replaced, andamputatedbecause legsherbe let to father herfor begs legs.She deformed with born was who girl teenager a of story the through convincingly most quality better provides which choice better a as presented too: are cases prosthetization other and amputation in appears dilemma This shows. case Robbins’ Dr. as practitioners, for represente is it as decision hard a and dilemma a is choice This disadvantages. several causes which Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s robotized machine, and human between boundaries blurring the presenting While d in d Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s shows the necessity and rationality of the usage of technology as a a as technology of usage the of rationality and necessity the shows n how to use the prosthetic, feel complex again, and finally she finally and again, complex feel prosthetic, the use to how n , and the medically rational decision is not self not is decision rational medically the and , nary consideration. 51

bins is a popular character, a smiley, happy happy smiley, a character, popular a is bins Two, transhumanism supports positive positive supports transhumanism Two,

the life of the practitioners, practitioners, the of life the Grey’s Anatomy, Grey’s

shows him her own own her him shows in posthumanist and posthumanist in - evident even even evident

in orderto in life life CEU eTD Collection and tooth hope, for fight always will accepts and reality mindits new of way understanding a itfinds Until nail. the and again whole be can body the that hope out holds mind The comp body the make to trying is mind The occurred. has trauma terrible a that accept can’t body the if as It’s limb. phantom called is syndrome “ since prosthetization: 29 of options the explores and surgery, the selects he hesitation re mean that possibilities other the consider negat the but reconstructed, be can it that hopes and arm own his keep to wants he face: to had Robbins Dr. that dilemma amputation same the represents story Romano’s oven. hot the on rested onc consequences: further had have arm which dysfunction, nerve replaced and loss, function the infection, pain, like life, consequences negative real in happens often it as Later, it. replace to managed team (200 9 Season in accident helicopter a in arm his lost Romano Robert Dr. Surgery the of Chief the First, story. life practitioners’ the through E.R. above prosthetic, practice butonly ofprosthetization. tothe em not is she sense a In one. artificial the for pity feel not does but leg lost real her about thinks she breakdown, emotional serious a to lead not does it and one, another with replaceable easily is leg prosthetic the accident: body the of parts integral not are these since hurt, cannot limb artificial and lost the that learn to has brain and part body the of loss the realize to brain the for easy not is it that indicates which pain, limb phantom from suffers she while a For complexity. transformed new, a gained she that feels Patients who undergo an amputation often feel a sensation where the missing limb was as if it’s still there. The The there. still it’s if as was limb missing the where sensation a feel often amputation an undergo who Patients

Season 9: Episode 12: 12: Episode Season9:

accept its replacement. The body has a different complexity after prosthetization and the and prosthetization after complexity different a has body The replacement. its accept which also represent and discuss the question of amputation and robotic prosthetization robotic and amputation of question the discuss and represent also which - mentioned How does prosthetization happen in a less glamorous hospital ten years before the the before years ten hospital glamorous less a in happen prosthetization does How v cneune idct te mosblt o ti peeec. hs h hs to has he Thus, preference. this of impossibility the indicate consequences ive 29 I i a iprat oet hn e atfca leg artificial her when moment important an is It . Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s “Walking on a dream” a on “Walking

e Romano burned the arm, because he had not felt that the arm had arm the that felt not had he because arm, the burned Romano e lete again. (…) The body can be stubborn when it comes to accepting change. change. accepting to comes it when stubborn be can body The (…) again. lete

cases? The next part examines two cer two examines part next The cases?

Dr. Meredith Grey’ Dr. toal dpnet n r once t a given a to connected or on dependent otionally 52 - muain n poteiain Atr long a After prosthetization. and amputation

4): the rotor cut off his arm, but the surgical the but arm, his off cut rotor the 4):

s opening and ending monologue: ending and sopening that what is gone is gone forever.” forever.” is isgone gone what that ras eas o a small a of because breaks tain examples from examples tain

his CEU eTD Collection http://www.oandp.com/articles/news_2003 30 bein represented is which replacement, better a prostheticand Her good functionsbalance. is which requires motoric asthe same before, sport do to able is she change; not does career Robbins’ contrary, the On ones. real the as good as h malfunctioning the than better are replacements The too. prosthetization and replacement, the after surgeon a be cannot two the of perspectives career The amputation. the befo than life of quality same the exactly have to possibility the and prosthetization about messages different mediates qualities limbs’ artificial the between discrepancy The projects. about concerned not is usually board the and displayed rarely are problems insurance like issues social technologies, existing the improve to talent and capacity have physicians the source: endless an as cases practic medical certain of availability equal reason forprovides moreover, a this, valuable thought limbs artificial improved of advantages the of representation the Despite research. prosthetic modern of innovations latest the using by life complex called so ru is hobby new with his and back veterans, comes amputated with and work seasons to starts of he prosthetics; couple professional a for series the leaves He surgeons. of group E.R. a“Utah company Arm”by Control calledMotion produced myoelectric a use to stars he arm, artificial professional most the cover not does insurance

nning. He has a special pair of prosthetics for sports too, and as it is represented, he has the the has he represented, is it as and too, sports for prosthetics of pair special a has He nning. E' V hw etrs th r; otn poie by provided Content Arm; Utah Features Show TV 'ER'

doctor anddoctor In the second the In - otold rshtc i ti sre. h tm dfeec bten h to series two the between difference time The series. this in prosthetics controlled rock musician. Both of his legs have to be amputated despite the efforts of the effortsof the despite amputatedbe to legshave his of Both musician. rock

E.R the prices of certain treatments and surgeries, only ongoing research research ongoing only surgeries, and treatments certain of prices the . case, in Season Thirteen, a truck hits Dr. Ray Barnett the young the Barnett Ray Dr. hits truck a Thirteen, Season in case, .

- 09 - 30_02.asp es, while while es, 53 E.R. g as good as a real limb, but not as a capacity a as not but limb, real a as good as g

(Ju

ne,2014) rather deals with issues like insurances and like insuranceswith issues rather and deals E.R

ant lvs dfeet ie fe his after life different a lives Barnett

h OP DE Spebr 0 2003 30, September EDGE, O&P The rys Anatomy Grey’s . practitioners become worse: Romano Romano worse: become practitioners .

30 .

hr i n mnin of mention no is there

rsns biomedicine presents uman limbs, but notbut limbs, uman

Link: re re CEU eTD Collection about concerns bioethical raises which virus, the him gives secretly Bailey dying, is kid the since but treatment, the refuse they so parents, the scares plan This virus. HIV modified genetically with system immune malfunctioning a with kid a treats genetics Anatomy boundariesenhances andfutureand between machinesthepredictable thehuman ofthe body. 3 tissues, and organs perfectly: body 3 and mapping the of structure the understand to inevitable is It technologies. certain of application the about making decision before consideration scientific thorough of importance op This outcomes. predictable and consequences expectable the into insight deeper a get to possible is it body the in changes effective to leads that decision medical important an making before Thus, body. the of structure inner hidden formerly the informatio get to possible it make technologies both that sense the in printing organ successfully. more prevented be might certain diseases that is body the of structure genetic inner gen The through discernible bodies. their of fate the over control more gain might people thus technologies, mapping of use the to thanks predictable more be will 4.3. posthuman of issue enhancement the embodiment described Chapter Two. in represent not does series this thus enhancement,

h ise o peitbe uue n gntc apn ae ersne in represented are mapping genetic and future predictable of issues The of promises biggest the of One future andcontrollable Predictable -

related storylines that raise important bioethical questions. In Season Ten, Dr. B Dr. Ten, InSeason questions. bioethical important raise that storylines related hog D. iad Bie’ rsac poet. h sre cnan different contains series The projects. research Bailey’s Miranda Dr. through - D visualization brings the prac the brings visualization D - D printing supports the hybridity of the posthuman body, challenges the the challenges body, posthuman the of hybridity the supports printing D etic mapping; the human body has a predictable future, which implies implies which future, predictable a has body human the mapping; etic biomedicalization is that the future of the human body body human the of future the that is biomedicalization

54 titioners closer to this goal. By creating model model creating By goal. this to closer titioners

Genetic research is similar to 3 to similar is research Genetic h rgt o ae medical make to right the portunity reinforces the the reinforces portunity n about n Grey’s ailey - D

CEU eTD Collection anatomy/news/medical 31 of physicians professionals. medical by driven are that biotechnologies medical modern 4.4. medi and family her about anything know not did they formerly because daughter, adopted their Zola, about information get to them to helpful more was mapping Genetic happen. to likely he that shows result test genetic his consciously: information this treat to her convinces Shepherd Dr. husband, her later But doctor. a from reaction rational a not is which AD, have definitely will she that and her, scares It disease. the for markers genetic the has she that out turns it and genetictest a have to wants who first the Greyis Meredith Dr. m Alzheimer, had mother her Since genome diseases. certain for genes on risk about information provides focused research genetics former Bailey’s Dr. to genetics. connected is it and series the in topic central a also is which (AD), Disease Alzheimer research, notfindthe proje they because did the for except helped have could else nothing that evident was it but worked, idea The decisions.

The official website’s description about the “Genome Mapping Program”: Program”: “GenomeMapping the about website’sofficialdescription The

obde ramn.Dsietescesu ramn, h or htdw h genetic the down shut Board the treatment, successful the Despite treatment. forbidden

cal past. codn t te eetd cases selected the to According projects theresearch of Backgrounds like disease for cure and prevention find to aim projects research medical Current

rys Anatomy Grey’s - case

a gns ht niae rs o hri adcin wih s o really not is which addiction, heroin of risk a indicate that genes has - file/medical

want want - case - file

o c to - otuait moiet oe t eit through exist to comes embodiment posthumanist 915 ct promising. hallenge the meaning of human, enhance the the enhance human, of meaning the hallenge - 55 genome

she takes it for granted that the risk means means risk the that granted for it takes she - mapping

)

http://abc.go.com/shows/greys apping The fictional fictional The 31 which , - CEU eTD Collection Dr. model, role a has she Surgery, Cardio for feels him. she likeexactly wantsbe to Surgery: Yang Cardio ofthe the leader Burke, that passion and commitment enormous the Behind mo are motivations Yang’s Dr. friend, best her contrary, the 33 comparisons, 32 and motivations Personal innovations. effectiveposthumanist violated serious standards bioethical research toward medical inst drug the gave intentionally she method: research the changing by misconduct professional a committed Grey Dr. but together, trial the is which non currently the to treatment a find to effort an presented A from wife his save wife and something create thatcouldArizona’s life make quality her help to was motivation her that admits she idea, her with Shepherd Dr. of study mapping brain the joins she When prosthetics. betterdevelop to helps which receptors sensoryimprove important other present or human, of questions. posthumanist meaning the change that innovations medical posthumanist embodiment. posthuman with engagement practitioners’ the of amount the show projects research medical represented the these aims reflect the post body: the over control more provides which science better make or body, the of capacities

These medical ambitions appear in other theoretical theoretical other in appear ambitions medical These Dr. Grey’s motivation usually comes from other practitioners, like her mother, husband, and best friend. On On friend. best and husband, mother, her like practitioners, other from comes usually motivation Grey’s Dr. y rsnig hs eape I ru ta nt ny cetfc ol my ed to lead may goals scientific only not that argue I examples these presenting By to trial Alzheimer an started he intention: Shepherd’s Dr. to similar is motivation This Torre Dr. inspire prosthetization and amputation Robbins’ Dr. example, For In an important an Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

but

r rnhmns values transhumanist or

simply uses post uses simply

lzheimer

challenge of medical biotechnology. In Season Seven, the couple led led couple the Seven, Season In biotechnology. medical of challenge

- , the examination of motivations and background decisions behind decisions background and motivations of examination the , , and transhumanist thoughts inChapter thatwere Two described - , and transhumanism as a conceptual framework and reference point. reference and framework conceptual as a transhumanism and ,

before they learnt that Dr. Grey has has Grey Dr. that learnt they before It

s ot dsusn wih rciinr ok acrig to according works practitioner which discussing worth is and ; ead of the placebo to a patient she knew, thus she she thus knew, she patient a to placebo the of ead 56 approaches hr ae rvt lf mtvtos wih fuel which motivations, life private are there

re professional, she dedicates herself to medicine. medicine. to herself dedicates she professional, re

and and - eras cura . 33 emotional story lines behind the the behind storylines emotional , but the thesis thesis the but ,

ble and non and ble better. AD genes AD

does not aim to make make to aim not does - . preventable AD, AD, preventable Thus, the series series the

to s 32 .

CEU eTD Collection of fields presented the series, the of difference time the of because probably dilemmas ri between better tobetter medicineembodiment. thatleads of improvement the in engaged also are they but patients, their of lives the save to want only of form new a seems in It represented became Turow. heroism professional Joseph by instance for described was medical in which characters dramas, doctor shifting the regarding Four Chapter on reflect to important fearshumanist withthe so that argue and moralist by fueled approaches pessimist technophobe, and critical to attitudes innovation var very be can technology on Reflections issues. these toward attitudes people’s and technology given the of consequences predictable on depend processes. research during considered w context, cultural and political, social, wider a on rest technologies certain toward makers decision and laypeople of Attitudes innovations. medical with humans serve To funders. and politicians like unde makers decision of arguments rational the the or of patients, attitudes emotional like technologies, emerging of success the affect factors other i it that show creators for toward uncritical changes the awayaudience. optimism wouldkeep people from many . di the problematize not does which that state I questions. medical technological highly with deals which series a just drama, bemedical would not these,without researchare theseries important, because projects rstand these factors, it is not always enough to be a be to enough always not is it factors, these rstand rm h prpcie f iehc, as bioethics, of perspective the From leaders its and innovation medical posthumanist of examination the In the but series, the to according necessary are medicine in development Technological h ad rn ae o es fr the for easy not are wrong and ght s not enough to be professionally engaged in innovations, partly because because partlyinnovations, in engaged professionally be to enough not s fferent issues of technology of issues fferent - called nature human It is similar similar is It 57 rys Anatomy: Grey’s

t s ersne i te eis te decisions the series, the in represented is it

doctors

bioethics, where the control the where bioethics, ER peet fewer presents E.R. . n

e: t hne fo otms, pro optimist, from changes it ied: engaged professional who aims to aims who professional engaged

emotionally emotionally h dcos of doctors the and which pushes which and oen ethical modern

ih a t be to has hich and restriction restriction and hs eis not series this

t s also is it a

content content

- CEU eTD Collection body human the parts, body these of death the After it. describes important culturally have essay Vidal’s Fernando instance for as brain life, human with identified are organs these meanings: and heart the moreover, specializations, and medicine different the between hierarchy of form a represents This boards. award and House White the Founders, the for valuable are that projects the are These activities. medical top how itcouldhappen. way the control strictly but medicine better make to aims which Foundation, the of interests the to according works hospital the that is conclusion The successes. groundbreaking and on they that clarified and hospital, the of projects research ongoing the revised Foundation the case, this After hospital. Foundation’s the for to award the give to refused Foundation the of head the that out turns 3 her for award the to nominated is Yang Dr. season, tenth the In innovations. medical effective make who doctors for award t projects; the of effect the and outcomes predictable the on focuses Foundation The research. about decisions make to Foundation the to rights more provides these between collaboration th the Thus, financially. of decisions Harper the the on and depend Board they professional because research, lead to opportunities limited pos to according work to canSloan beengaged more inmedical research. Grey wealthy the care, health general and medicine regenerative on focused more is hospital institutions the of aims the and circumstances general the and medicine, e ol fn rpdy mrvn rsac. oevr te Harper the Moreover, research. improving rapidly fund only hey It is a Itis Grey the that is Myconcept lso important to noteto that important lso dcos ae o i it te xettos f h to ors ad the and boards, two the of expectations the into fit to have doctors e

t - , and transhumanist values. However, its practitioners have only only have practitioners its However, values. transhumanist and , - D heart printing technology, but she does not does she but technology, printing heart D - Sloan Memorial Hospital as an institution is moresuitable is institution an as Hospital Memorial Sloan - Grey’sAnatomy Avery Foundation that stands behind the hospital hospital the behind stands that Foundation Avery 58

ly support projects with impressive results impressive with projects support ly

represents brain and cardio research as researchas cardio andbrain represents

is dead, the other body parts parts body other the dead, is - vr hs prestigious a has Avery her . W . because she works works she because hile E.R.’s co E.R.’s hile

get it. Later it it Later it. get

fields of fields unty -

CEU eTD Collection no is there so participants, the of level professional the on depends project research the medical modern an life human on effect serious improving a have that technologies by posthumanization of process the in involved equally are transformation? the of group which involvement: of question the examine to important is it physicians, the of attitudes scientific the and questions 4.5. that fiction of level the from comes discussions public the of basis the genre.Therefore the toward As d issues. medical presented the of discussions and considerations further for laypeople for forum a provide which embodiment, that might causeexcitement or anxiety,becan mediated which by thenarratives. issues emerging questions, striking with cases represent to have they so interest, audience’s fields connected cultural The beings. human other of lives the save to order in donated be can human the of organs and ebate

Three Chapter contains reliable information.

whether medical whether From a gender perspective, according to according perspective, gender a From research in hospital the of practices making decision the of examination the After Additions M motne f hs organs these of importance edical drama series are important are series drama edical

f eiie Te creators The medicine. of

discusses

technology makes the world a better place for human beings or not. or beings human for place better a world the makes technology acrc ad eiblt ae fe rgre a expectations as regarded often are reliability and accuracy , It is It

doctors an opportunity to think about posthumanist issues and issues posthumanist about think to opportunity an probably probably representational platforms of posthuman ideas and ideas posthuman of platforms representational

59 is able to lead the processes of processes the lead to able is f h series the of

Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s enhances d embodiment. The responsibility for for responsibility The embodiment. d h adec’ itrs i the in interest audience’s the ae o id h fed o the of fields the find to have , female and male p male and female ,

innovation and innovation

hysicians

CEU eTD Collection the without manageable is part Orthopedic the inventor. representatives, House White the for thought improvement the individual to contribution Torres’ Dr. on gender: medicinenot of field theon based discrimination in interested not are they 34 bod the of structure inner the of mapping and prosthetization transplantation, of cases the As body. human the of transformation medical the to connected are that issues both leadersof change. and objects reproduction.probably posthumanist first of target the so the in parent become cannot who people reproduction: fertili posthuman artificial of kind This anymore. process blind it makes a not is reproductiondonation since offspring, the of artificial characteristics bodily and inner the select that to possible implies donor the of selection The Ten). and Nine insem artificial and donor a using babyahaveby to planned who Robbins, Dr. and Torres Dr. couple, lesbian married the of case the through discussed were technologies repr assistive and gynecology on focus not do series the currently, because reproduction, artificial ontheessentialthat build bodily differencestwosexes. ofthe concep those eliminates which organs, female and male between difference no is there so different, is sex whose people between organs donate to possible is It change. to objects also bodies male and of objects and leaders are women politics institutional other or foundation leve professional The males. by towards gender negative discrimination positive or

The only case when when case only The dcin Bt in But oduction. In summary, this chapter examined the representational level of different posthumanist posthumanist differentof level representational the examined chapter this Insummary, gender highly the on reflect not do examples selected The

are equally transformable, hybridizable and robotizable. Young bodies are bodies Young robotizable. and hybridizable transformable, equally are a woman is discriminated is when the White House only wants to hire Dr. Shepherd while while Shepherd Dr. hire to wants only House White when the is is discriminated woman a

rys Anatomy Grey’s

l of the practitioners and external circumstances such as as such circumstances external and practitioners the of l posthuman posthuman

te osblte ad om o atfca reproduction artificial of forms and possibilities the ,

r mr efcie atr ta gender. than factors effective more are 60 transformation: according to the series, female series, the to according transformation:

ly the Neurologist part of the research regarded as an as an regarded research the of part Neurologist ly the 34 , which limits thebelief science, which is that limits This example showsthatphysiciansThis example are zation reflects on the concepts of of concepts the on reflects zation - controlled prosthetics research. But this this But research. prosthetics controlled

- related medical practices of of practices medical related - called natural way are way natural called y show, medical medical show, y ination (Season ination e and Men led ts

CEU eTD Collection to right human’s the about understanding different a have who groups religious or ethnical ar body the of technologization the and body the over control tighter reach to possible replaceable are limbs and organs regeneratebodilyorderto function in r and mechanization especially series, two these that argue I construction. bodily and future posthuman a about comfortable and optimistic the help to order in lines story emotionallyget engaged audience to understanding these abetter practices. of unusual shocking, the of mediation and explanation get the of appearance the like lines story of process the mediate of technologization the accept series the of characters The technologies. emerging by alienated or dehumanized become not do way people Inthis technologies. faceof human the strengthen that lines story byemotional thattr technologies series; the not problematizedinthe by successfully replaced be can bodies technology. human that suggest also but technol by developments, changed is it how or is human the what about questions complex raise only not dramas These developments. medical by impacted are humans how ways the of paradoxes and ambiguities many of deliberation the for venue a provide dramas ationality of robotization and hybridization of the body. the of hybridization and robotization of ationality

oiebe ei atnin i attention: media noticeable The question is whether these series are encouraging or discouraging the public to feel to public the discouraging or encouraging are series these whether is question The are humanity loosing of question the and technologies these of harms and costs The

eiaiain f h body the of medicalization transformation. Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s

the body in an emotional way: these human emotions of the of emotions human these way: emotional an in body the tee ae, the cases, these n , hog te s o eegn tcnlge i becomes it technologies emerging of use the through

3 or build up missing build or -

e usually represented as members of different cultural, different of members as represented usually e As it is evidenced by the media coverage of the series, series, the of coverage media the by evidenced is it As D printer or the robotization of the practitioner’s body practitioner’s the of robotization the or printer D

encourage people to accept the nec the accept to people encourage 61 . Those who are against medical developments medical against are who Those

n te ains r c are patients the and journalists ansform the bodies are highly mediated are highly bodies mediated the ansform

These m These abilities and it seemsitand abilities

ly n motn rl i the in role important an play edical practices are required required are practices edical nicbe bu the about onvincible gcl n scientific and ogical

human tissues,human essity of the the of essity CEU eTD Collection 35 the process. within scientists and technology to role important an prescribes which development, human evo and religious the from away step clear a is It God. of instead reparation onl Avery Dr. parents. the choic the respects and understands Kepner Dr. medicine, and development technological Christian to implant body.the of characteristics given the alter

Season 10, Episode 22: Episode Season10,

r Arl enr n D. Avery: Dr. and Kepner April Dr. be built into theirear intodeafdaughter’sbuilt be of the body He also claims that that claims also He body the of

„We are never ever getting back together” back getting ever never „Weare y believes in medicine and medicine in ybelieves

In season ten, there is a couple who couple a thereis ten, In season 62 ht ehooy ed ad mrvs h world the improves and leads technology that hl te bt blee n h ncsiy of necessity the in believe both they while 35

. This states that the only rational choice is the is choice rational only the that states

case leads to an argument betweenthe argument an to caseleads

lutionary approaches of of approaches lutionary do not allow anallow not do e of of e CEU eTD Collection death,and life like questions body,and human the medicine, on explicitly focusbecause these examineplatforms conceptsimportant to posthumanist thatcommunicate laypeople. for o high in amount engage to people certainenables which knowledge background a require issue the of articulations academic participate: to laypeople for opportunity the give not do debates scholarly since latter, the examine to important is it representation of level keyaround scholars posthumanism. what issues call of analysis collective the in participated have series medical popular very two how at looked medicine; about beliefs and understanding public’s general the in information of source that followfrom them. technolo new processingof public’s the in stakeholder important an been always has fiction science fact, In fiction. through also non articles, newspaper like culture mainstream through options most sources, scientific reading on based issues these debate people some While individuals. and citizens as decisions make to as well as up keep to order in advancements and options complicated these of sense make to have People lives. decisions personal and implications, practical ethics, about questions different involve possibilities These considered. be to has possibilities and issues new of lot a have coas ae motn dbts bu pshmns ad h cnet xss n the on exists concept the and posthumanism about debates important have Scholars and forum a been also has television popular how underscore to tried has thesis This societies advanced technology and medicine in changes the of because that fact The y hss a fcsd n gne f oua clue ald eia daa seri drama medical called culture popular of genre a on focused has thesis My too, for instance in contemporary art and popular culture. I argued that argued I culture. popular and art contemporary in instance for too,

gy and science, and the philosophical and social questions social and philosophical the and science, gyand CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 63

of t of

hem -

- fictional media accounts, but accounts, media fictional process the information and information the process level discussions. Thus, it is it Thus, discussions. level

for one’s own own one’s for

and and es, f CEU eTD Collection an as transformation posthuman address series the concept, the about debate scholarly the in non standards, buttheemotional storyacceptable. make and these lines mediate cases more sometimes are that ambitions and thes emotions cases some in level, professional a from come always between and cultural medical the industries institutions. act also are they states, Turow fictional the Thus outcomes. of theory the as do: the dramas medical of creators the as just actors, of other on depend physicians significance the about decisions makes also who o group a rather but institution, bioethical a not in that fact the by explained be can It research. medical of boundaries ethical and controversies,be can balance which certain professional resolvable only interest, attention, but entail that posthumanism, those it: about of perspectives debate contradictory whole, the represent not academyandcult populardebatefields of within the about andunderstand construct technologies embodiment. biomedical that posthuman to helped have series the th state I and audience the show, for issues medical understand articles and studies case literature, introduced the As developments. medical and biomedicine about people inform to potential the have these since of way alternative m an that as argued I products communication. two scientific its and genre the examined I illness. and health Grey’s Anatomy Grey’s These dramas not only present posthuman embodiment but m but embodiment posthuman present only not dramas These not do decisions medical and improvements make to motivations the Moreover, ethical the about debate critical serious no is there series examined the Within posthumanist the of depth and quality the that shows analysis content the However, , the representation of controversial posthumanist issues is less critical than than critical less is issues posthumanist controversial of representation the , ors in the game of power and contradictory interests that exist that interests contradictory and power of game the in ors d with the emotional content. d withthe emotional dcl rm sre ae more are series drama edical 64

f funders that controls medical research, and and research, medical controls that funders f ure are not the same. Popular culture does culture ure Popular are notthe same. - tia acrig o h professional the to according ethical

at the genre helps to raise awareness raise to helps genre the at e are connected to personal personal to connected are e

ediate its controversies: its ediate Grey’s Anatomy, Grey’s hn entertainment than

it is it CEU eTD Collection on understanding their enhances that content reliable get people case ideal an In discussions. i it and rising, awareness important, socially and individually medical improvements affect the embodiment of socially disadvantaged people. state a represents which E.R., like drama medical a that suggest I culture. popular of genre a and industries cultural the of products rather documentaries, not are dramas medical these that considers percepti critical to audience the the teaching reduceworth also to is it inevitable but messages, misleading is it way this In content. reliable and accurate create to attempt audience the saw, we as since problematic particularly is It biomedicalization. and healthcare in and chances position people’s affect that inequalities social of problematization the out leave and of process the in involved be to chance the posthumanization. have not do who people those in hopes unapproachable enhance probably but technologies, medical and embodiment posthuman of fill dramas Medical body. the of capacities the affects effectively that treatments biotechnological highly newest, the get to chances worst the have well not poor, young, including posthumanism, about discussion academic no are who Those medicine. about knowledge background some least at have already supposedly that groups the are these considerably, but contents, medical understand well show, Foundation Kaiser oflike therobotization the body with malfunctioning tolive than humanbodies. technologies medical artificial apply to better is it that idea the support and option, optimistic The circulation of posthumanist concepts within popular culture and medical dramas is and is dramas medical culture popular conceptswithin posthumanist The circulationof repr many with critical am I stud the as that is potential infotainment dramas’ medical about concern My relies on the medical content of these dramas, and the creators reinforce their their reinforce creators the and dramas, these of content medical the on relies - funded, urban hospital, is an important source important an is hospital, urban funded,

- ad n well and paid esentations since in some cases these are more optimistic optimistic more are these cases some in since esentations 65

- dctd epe r te ot aal to capable most the are people educated

the informational gap around the issues issues the around gap informational the

that represents how the new new the how represents that a ivtto fr further for invitation an s - educated people, people, educated t involved in the in involved t

on which on y of the of y CEU eTD Collection medicalized embodiment. posthuman se I how is this extension: knowledge further and negotiations, discussions, entails representation the and issue medical certain the

a well a e 66

- ucinn rpeetto pafr of platform representation functioning CEU eTD Collection issues.html Link: MD. John: Gever, Inevitability Aarhus: University Aarhus Press, 2012 or In Future?” “Agency Technological Francis: Fukuyama, Revolution. (2002). Francis. Fukuyama, Rosenthal, pp.48 “Genetics Lone: Frank, University Esposito, Link: (IETT)for Emerging Ethics andTechnologies Dvorsky &Illness narratives”. medical of reception the viewing: “Healthy Solange: Davin, Also available online: “ Collee, John: Revisited: Biomedicalization 21 and Pescosolido etal, pp.173 the for Blueprint A Healing: “Medicalization and Illness, Health, of Sociology Shim: the of Janet In Medicine.” and American and Illness Health, of Transformation and Technoscience E. Adele Clarke Condition “Post Harris: John and Sarah Chan, Value Inquiry Bostrom, Link: 'ER'” on Alley, Consults “Prosthetist Randall: Link: “ Report: of Foundation Family Kaiser A

Grey’s

2010. 2010. http://ieet.org/archive/IEET http://www.oandp.com/articles/news_2004 http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/7803.pdf , George, and James Hughes. „Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary.” Binary.” Gender the Beyond „Postgenderism: Hughes. James and George, , , Vol. 25. No 6. 2003. pp.662 , Vol.25.No6.

Roberto

Anatomy”, Nick: “Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective”. Transhumanist A Enhancements: Genetic “Human Nick:

ed. Mads Rosenthal, of

http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/04/greys (June, 2014)(June, New Picador. York:

, Vol. 37, No. 4,2003. , Vol.37, Minnesota Medical fiction „ rys ntm ad te T dcos kr botia issues”. bioethical skirt doctors TV other and Anatomy Grey’s -

60. Aarhus: Aarhus60. Aarhus: Press, University 2012 (2008)

online http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1115404/

- Press.

Bíos: 201. SpringerBusiness ScienceLLC, + Media, 2011. t ut o Proa” In Personal” Got Just It

report, h Pshmn Condition Posthuman The u Pshmn uue Cneune o te Biotechnology the of Consequences Future: Posthuman Our ”

pp. 77. Biopolitics BMJ.

- 03

BIBLIOGRAPHY 2008. pp. 493 -

PostGender.pdf - 318. 1999; pp. 955 318. 1999;pp. - What? And Why Does It Matter?” In Matter?” It Does Why And What? -

90. 679.

Television as a Health Educator: A Case Study Study Case A Educator: Health a as Television

Aarhus: AarhusAarhus: 2012. University Press, and -

506. 506. , Hartford: 67 The O&PThe EDGE

Philosophy

- 02

- 02_02.asp

Will Human Beings Control Their Their Control Beings Human Will ( June, 2014) June, h Pshmn Condition Posthuman The

– 2008 - d Md Rsnhl p. 157 pp. Rosenthal, Mads ed. 956. anatomy

. Tr.

Timothy , 2004 (June, 2014) (June,

- tv -

doctors

Campbell. st Sociology of Health of Sociology

(June, Century

- skirt The Posthuman The

Minneapolis:

(June, 2014) (June,

2014) -

bioethical Journal of Journal Handbook d Mads ed. eds. Institute Institute KEVIN KEVIN

- B.A. 170.

- CEU eTD Collection (1989): Power Joseph Turow, N. Review Goodier: Crandell Bethany and Elena Strausman, anatomy Link: Satisfaction” of ViewingPerceptions Grey'sAnatomyof on Brian:“TheEffects Quick, Link: Posthumanities, „Posthumanities the of “Rise K.: Pramod Nayar, anatomy/ Link: Meredithgenetic Grey’s testing storyline believable.” “ Melissa: Malamut, Press, 2007. Wajcman, Judy and Lynch Michael Edition Amsterdamska, Olga Third Studies, Technology and Science of Handbook The Boundaries Contested and Horizons, Cultural Technologies, Biomedical Margaret: Lock, Link: Debate Kwong, Future the Condition of Medicine The Soren: Holm, Lynchand Jud In Edition Technologies.” Third Studies, Medical Technology „Emerging F. Linda Hogle, Herbrechte andInformatics.Literature, (1999). Katherine. Hayles, 2014. Link: Hans Indiana University Press Halberstam 2, pp.127 , http://www.bostonmagazine.com/health/blog/2013/10/03/science http://www.academia.edu/644750/Posthumanities http://healthydebate.ca/opinions/tv

Daniel: ” http://prospectivedoctor.com/articles/item/37 , 2013. http://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1 .

of Grey’s Anatomy, House, and Nip/Tuck and House, Anatomy, Grey’s of Wilson - NewYork: Oxford University Press. NewYork: Oxford

on (June, 2014) (June,

ed. Mads r, Stefan. (2013). r, Stefan.(2013). , - - perceptions

131. 2008. uih M. Judith Journal of Broadcasting &Journal ofBroadcasting Elec

“

y Wajcman, Grey's Anatomy's Real Effect” World

: pp. 1

“ TV medical dramas: pure entertainment or a useful teaching tool?” or aTV medicalpure dramas: useful entertainment tool?” teaching

Rosenthal, pp.60 The Science Behind Grey’sAnatomy:Science Behind The -

20. 2009.

. n Ira and (June, 2014) (June,

pp.

Chicago: University of ChicagoChicago: Press. University of Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. Posthumanism: ACritical How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Cybernetics, in Bodies Virtual Posthuman: Became We How “ lyn Doctor Playing 841

Livingston - , eds. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Michael 873. Cambridge: MIT Press, The 2007. Amsterdamska, Olga Hackett, J. Edward eds. , -

75. Aarhus: Aarhus75. Aarhus:2012 University Press, - medical

tronic Media, tronic eds. eds. 68

ie og n Popr In Prosper? and Long Live .

- -

dramas “ Exit, the Human…Pursued by the Cyborg” Cyborg” the by Human…Pursued the Exit, (1995): ” Television, Storytelling, and Medical Medical and Storytelling, Television, - Not Your Grandmother’s Doctor Show: A Show: Doctor Grandmother’s Your Not . - 197233665/the greys , Journal of Medical Humanities Medical of Journal Boston Magazine Prospective Doctor,

(June, 2014) (June, - useful - pp.

anatomys How Harvard’ How otua Bodies. Posthuman

Vol. 53, No. 1, 2009. Vol. 53,No.1, The Handbook of Science and and Science of Handbook The 875 -

London: Bloomsburry. teaching - - 900. Cambridge: The MIT MIT The Cambridge: 900.

es Ewr J Hackett, J. Edward eds. , effects -

real - behind , 2013. , 2013. - - s Ting Wu made Dr. Dr. made TingWu s world tool

Doctors and Patient andDoctors - 2012 of

- The Posthuman Posthuman The -

viewing (June, 2014) (June, greys

Bloomington:

effect

- , Vol. 29, 29, Vol. , Healthy -

grey (June,

. In .

- s -

CEU eTD Collection Minnesota Press. Wolfe, C.(2010) Sciences “Brainhood Fernando: Vidal, , Vol. 22. N5, 2009, pp.5 N5, 2009, , Vol.22.

What Posthumanism? is , anthropological figure of modernity. “ modernity. of figure anthropological , - 36.

Minneapolis: University of 69

History of the Human Human the of History