DOCSLIB.ORG

Health and Disease in Red-Crowned Parakeets (Cyanoramphus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Health and disease in Red-crowned Parakeets (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) on Tiritiri Matangi Island; causes of feather loss and implications for conservation managers Dr Bethany Jackson BVSc MVS (Con Med) Murdoch University A dissertation submitted to Murdoch University in fulfillment of the requirements of a Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors Assoc Prof Kris Warren BSc, BVMS (Hons), PhD, Dip ECZM (Wildlife Population Health) Dr Richard Jakob-Hoff BSc (Hons), BVMS, MANZCVS (Wildlife Medicine) Dr Arvind Varsani BSc, PhD Dr Carly Holyoake BSc BVMS PhD Prof Ian Robertson BVSc, PhD, MACVSc (Epidemiology) November 2014 “This report, by its very length, defends itself against the risk of being read” Winston Churchill ii I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content, work which has not been previously submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Dr Bethany Jackson BVSc MVS (Con Med) December 2014 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Like most achievements in life, this project has come about through the generosity and support of a great many people, professionally and personally. Thank you!!! To Kris Warren, Richard Jakob-Hoff, Arvind Varsani, Carly Holyoake, and Ian Robertson for inspiration, guidance, support, feedback, encouragement, and a collective sense of humour when needed. To the Auckland Zoo and the Auckland Zoo Conservation Fund for their financial, logistical and professional support of this project, as well as me, through the residency program. It was a pleasure to work for an organisation full of passionate staff and with a clear vision of the need to connect zoos, and visitors, with in situ conservation projects and activities. An enormous thank you must go to the very many Auckland Zoo keepers and staff who provided such capable field assistance during the work, as well as some sensational cooking and entertainment packages. Also to the zoo maintenance staff for the plastic nest box extravaganza. To the Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi Island, an incredible and enthusiastic bunch of genuinely lovely people with a passion for conservation of New Zealand species. They provided support in the field, as well as feedback into the design and implementation of the study based on their vast current and historical understanding of the island. Volunteer groups like the Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi Island are fantastic ambassadors for what is achievable in conservation if you have a public that cares, which fortunately New Zealand does. To the Department of Conservation rangers and Warkworth area office staff, for providing substantial support for field logistics on Tiritiri Matangi Island and Hauturu- iv o-Toi/Little Barrier Island, including in kind funding. The project would not have been possible, or as enjoyable, without the assistance from the talented and dedicated DOC rangers and field staff on both islands, especially Dave Jenkins, Daryl Stephens, Jess Clark, Jason Campbell, Nichy Brown and the effervescent Richard, Leigh, Liam and Mahina Walle. To Allen Heath, one of the few remaining experts in morphological identification of parasites in New Zealand, and a really wonderful human being. Thank you for being as (if not more?) excited about the mites, which quite frankly turned me into a rather dull dinner party guest (Mary VA will testify). I feel incredibly fortunate to have had the opportunity to learn from and work with you. Thank you also to the following organisations and individuals for funding and support, and believing in New Zealand species and their conservation: 360 Discovery Ferries, Bivouac Outdoor, Marley Plastics, Forest and Bird New Zealand, New Zealand Veterinary Pathology, Massey University especially Brett Gartrell, Laryssa Howe and Luis Ortiz-Catedral, Long Bay College Students (who so cheerfully made the wooden nest boxes!). There are a few creatures that need to be thanked individually, for friendship and logistical support during the process, recording sighs of despair and lives saved, and enduring the endless talk about mites. They are Natalie Ann Sullivan, Danae Moore, Kate McInnes, Emma Wells, Clio Reid, Mary Van Andel, Stephanie Jervis, Kirsten Derry, Danny White, Peter Fraser, Mikaylie Wilson, Simon Fordham, Morag Fordham, John Stewart, Kay Milton, and Mary Ann Rowland. v ABSTRACT Research into the diseases of free–ranging wildlife requires targeted surveillance for pathogen(s) of interest, however also relies on reference data of general health indicators against which findings can be interpreted. Wildlife reintroductions and translocations in New Zealand introduce specific disease risks related to spread of disease agents from the source site, exposure to novel disease at the destination, or changes in transmission factors for existing diseases at the destination. The discovery of Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) causing clinical disease in wild Red-crowned Parakeets (RCP, Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) intended for translocation in 2008 led to an increased interest from conservation managers in the pathogens affecting this species. This study aimed to investigate health and disease in a free-ranging population of RCP experiencing feather loss, with an epidemiological focus to determine temporal trends in disease prevalence, and infer risk factors for disease expression. We captured 229 individuals over 5 sampling sessions between 2011-2013, including 4 surveys on Tiritiri Matangi Island (n=184), and one survey on Hauturu-o-Toi/Little Barrier Island (LBI) (n=45). Normal haematological and biochemical reference ranges were described. The relatively high creatine kinase results highlighted a potential susceptibility to capture myopathy in this species, and warrant further investigation. Comparison of DNA- based sexing results to beak measurements demonstrated high concordance between the two sexing methods. vi We investigated BFDV in the population by PCR of blood and feather, and found a low total prevalence on Tiritiri Matangi Island of 1.09% (0.1-3.9%) for 2011-12, and on Hauturu-o-Toi/LBI of 4.4% (0.5%-15.1%) in 2013. Screening by PCR of opportunistic samples from the Wellington region of the North Island, and phylogenetic analysis of the full viral genome sequences from all positive samples, revealed ongoing evidence of viral flow between RCP and Eastern Rosellas (Platycercus eximius) in the Hauraki Gulf/Auckland region, with separate but closely related strains from the Wellington region. These findings, combined with the first report of seroprevalence data for a New Zealand parrot using the haemagglutination inhibition test, suggest RCP may be a dead-end or spill over host for BFDV, with implications for a downgrading of the conservation threat this pathogen currently poses. The collection of skin biopsies in all birds during the 2012 and 2013 (n=135) following an outbreak of feather loss led to the discovery of a knemidokoptinid mite associated with mange in this species. The mite, Procnemidocoptes janssensi has only been previously described once from a lovebird (Agapornis nigrigenis) in Zambia in 1967. We present the first report of the mite in New Zealand, including histopathological stages of infestation, and the first epidemiological study on mange in a wild parrot globally. Relative mite abundance (number of mites per skin biopsy) was found to be associated with likelihood of feather loss and clinical signs. Findings were also consistent with the presence of a carrier or endemic state, with emergence of clinical disease and epizootics triggered by as yet unknown host, environment or mite factors. Finally, we conducted a nesting study using natural and artificial nests on Tiritiri Matangi Island from 2012-2013, to infer disease risks for nestling and fledgling RCP, and describe baseline health parameters for this group. Overall nesting success was vii low, and likely to be related to the drought experienced that year. Nest mites were detected in 64% (95%CI: 41-83%) of nests, however their presence did not significantly affect fledging success or numbers. Chicks from nest mite positive nests had higher mean absolute heterophil counts (p=0.04), suggesting an inflammatory response to the presence of these mites, and a potential fitness cost that warrants further study. We did not detect BFDV in any nests studied, and therefore cannot infer the impact of this pathogen on this age class, although the study provided further evidence BFDV is present at a low prevalence on Tiritiri Matangi Island. viii Publications from or related to this thesis Peer reviewed: Jackson B, Harvey C, Galbraith J, Robertson M, Warren K, Holyoake C, Julian L, and Varsani A. 2014. Clinical beak and feather disease virus infection in wild juvenile eastern rosellas of New Zealand; biosecurity implications for wildlife care facilities, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 62(5): 297-301. Jackson B, Lorenzo A, Theuerkauf J, Barnaud A, Duval T, Guichard P, Bloc H, Baouma A, Stainton D, Kraberger S, Murphy S, Clark N, Dillon C, Knight T, and Varsani A. 2014. Preliminary surveillance for beak and feather disease virus in wild parrots of New Caledonia: implications of a reservoir species for Ouvea Parakeets. Emu 114(3): 283- 289. Massaro M, Ortiz-Catedral L, Kurenbach B, Kearvell J, Kemp J, Van Hal J, Elkington E, Galbraith J, Taylor G, McInnes K, Heber S, Steeves T, Walters M, Shaw S, Potter J, Farrant M, Brunton DH, Hauber M, Jackson B, Moorhouse R and Varsani A. 2012. Molecular characterisation of Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) in New Zealand and its implications for managing an emerging, infectious disease. Archives of Virology 157(9): 1651-63. Julian L, Lorenzo A, Chenuet JP, Borzon M, Marchal C, Vignon L, Collings DA, Walters M, Jackson B, and Varsani A. 2012. Evidence of multiple introductions of beak and feather disease virus into the Pacific islands of Nouvelle-Caledonie (New Caledonia). Journal of General Virology 93(11): 2466-72. ix Jackson B, Heath A, Harvey C, Holyoake C, Jakob-Hoff R, Varsani A, Robertson I, and Warren K. 2014. First report of knemidokoptinid (Epidermoptidae: Knemidokoptinae) mite infestation in wild red-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae); correlations between macroscopic and microscopic findings.
Recommended publications
  • TAG Operational Structure

    TAG Operational Structure

    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
  • Foraging Ecology of the World's Only

    Foraging Ecology of the World's Only

    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. FORAGING ECOLOGY OF THE WORLD’S ONLY POPULATION OF THE CRITICALLY ENDANGERED TASMAN PARAKEET (CYANORAMPHUS COOKII), ON NORFOLK ISLAND A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Biology at Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand. Amy Waldmann 2016 The Tasman parakeet (Cyanoramphus cookii) Photo: L. Ortiz-Catedral© ii ABSTRACT I studied the foraging ecology of the world’s only population of the critically endangered Tasman parakeet (Cyanoramphus cookii) on Norfolk Island, from July 2013 to March 2015. I characterised, for the first time in nearly 30 years of management, the diversity of foods consumed and seasonal trends in foraging heights and foraging group sizes. In addition to field observations, I also collated available information on the feeding biology of the genus Cyanoramphus, to understand the diversity of species and food types consumed by Tasman parakeets and their closest living relatives as a function of bill morphology. I discuss my findings in the context of the conservation of the Tasman parakeet, specifically the impending translocation of the species to Phillip Island. I demonstrate that Tasman parakeets have a broad and flexible diet that includes seeds, fruits, flowers, pollen, sori, sprout rhizomes and bark of 30 native and introduced plant species found within Norfolk Island National Park. Dry seeds (predominantly Araucaria heterophylla) are consumed most frequently during autumn (81% of diet), over a foraging area of ca.
  • External Parasites of Poultry

    External Parasites of Poultry

    eXtension External Parasites of Poultry articles.extension.org/pages/66149/external-parasites-of-poultry Written by: Dr. Jacquie Jacob, University of Kentucky Parasites are organisms that live in or on another organism, referred to as the host, and gain an advantage at the expense of the host. There are several external parasites that attack poultry by either sucking blood or feeding on the skin or feathers. In small flocks it is difficult to prevent contact with wild birds (especially English sparrows) and rodents that may carry parasites that can infest poultry. It is important to occasionally check your flock for external parasites. Early detection can prevent a flock outbreak. NOTE: Brand names appearing in this article are examples only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products not mentioned. Northern Fowl Mites Figure 1. Where to look for northern fowl mites. Created by Jacquie Jacob, University of Kentucky. Northern fowl mites (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) are the most common external parasite on poultry, especially on poultry in cool weather. Northern fowl mites are blood feeders. Clinical signs of an infestation will vary depending on the severity of the infestation. Heavy infestations can cause anemia due to loss of blood. Anemia is usually accompanied by a decrease in egg production or growth rate, decreased carcass quality, and decreased feed intake. Northern fowl mites will bite humans, causing itching and irritation of the skin. Northern fowl mites are small (1/25th of an inch), have eight legs, and are typically black or brown. To check for northern fowl mites, closely observe the vent area of poultry.
  • 07 2014 Common External Parasites A

    07 2014 Common External Parasites A

    11/7/14 Parasites An organism that lives off another Common External Parasites of Chickens Most animals and humans have them James Hermes, Ph.D. Internal and External Extension Poultry Specialist and Head Advisor Multi-species hosts or Species - specific Department of Animal Sciences Oregon State University The parasitic relationship is usually good for the parasite detrimental to the host Relationships of organisms of different species Parasites or Symbiotes Symbiosis Neutralism No apparent affect on either Related to a parasite is a symbiote Amensalism One harms another with no benefit Competition An organism that lives with another Mutual determent Commensalism Benefit for one without effect to the other The symbiotic relationship is usually good or at Mutualism Both benefit worst neutral for both organisms. Parasitism Antagonism One benefits at the expense of another What are the common ectoparasites of Poultry? Mites Lice Fleas Ticks 1 11/7/14 Mites Lice Fluff Louse Important Types Red Mites Northern Fowl Mites Less Common Shaft Louse Scaley Leg Mites Depluming Mites Head Louse Chicken mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) Life Cycles Roost Mites, Red Chicken Mite Poultry problem Worldwide Can feed on Humans Nocturnal Feeders – Blood Suckers Do not live on the birds Spend days in cracks and crevices of the chicken house Northern fowl mites (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) Most common parasite Chicken mites Cooler Temperature Blood feeders Come from wild birds, rodents, other animals Clinical Signs Heavy infestation – Anemia Reduced production and
  • Success of Translocations of Red-Fronted Parakeets

    Success of Translocations of Red-Fronted Parakeets

    Conservation Evidence (2010) 7, 21-26 www.ConservationEvidence.com Success of translocations of red-fronted parakeets Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae novaezelandiae from Little Barrier Island (Hauturu) to Motuihe Island, Auckland, New Zealand Luis Ortiz-Catedral* & Dianne H. Brunton Ecology and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland, New Zealand * Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY The red-fronted parakeet Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae is a vulnerable New Zealand endemic with a fragmented distribution, mostly inhabiting offshore islands free of introduced mammalian predators. Four populations have been established since the 1970s using captive-bred or wild-sourced individuals translocated to islands undergoing ecological restoration. To establish a new population in the Hauraki Gulf, North Island, a total of 31 parakeets were transferred from Little Barrier Island (Hauturu) to Motuihe Island in May 2008 and a further 18 in March 2009. Overall 55% and 42% of individuals from the first translocation were confirmed alive at 30 and 60 days post-release, respectively. Evidence of nesting and unassisted dispersal to a neighbouring island was observed within a year of release. These are outcomes are promising and indicate that translocation from a remnant wild population to an island free of introduced predators is a useful conservation tool to expand the geographic range of red-fronted parakeets. BACKGROUND mammalian predators and undergoing ecological restoration, Motuihe Island. The avifauna of New Zealand is presently considered to be the world’s most extinction- Little Barrier Island (c. 3,000 ha; 36 °12’S, prone (Sekercioglu et al. 2004). Currently, 77 175 °04’E) lies in the Hauraki Gulf of approximately 280 extant native species are approximately 80 km north of Auckland City considered threatened of which approximately (North Island), and is New Zealand’s oldest 30% are listed as Critically Endangered wildlife reserve, established in 1894 (Cometti (Miskelly et al.
  • The Responses of New Zealand's Arboreal Forest Birds to Invasive

    The Responses of New Zealand's Arboreal Forest Birds to Invasive

    The responses of New Zealand’s arboreal forest birds to invasive mammal control Nyree Fea A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington Te Whare Wānanga o te Ūpoko o te Ika a Māui 2018 ii This thesis was conducted under the supervision of Dr. Stephen Hartley (primary supervisor) School of Biological Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington, New Zealand and Associate Professor Wayne Linklater (secondary supervisor) School of Biological Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington, New Zealand iii iv Abstract Introduced mammalian predators are responsible for over half of contemporary extinctions and declines of birds. Endemic bird species on islands are particularly vulnerable to invasions of mammalian predators. The native bird species that remain in New Zealand forests continue to be threatened by predation from invasive mammals, with brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) ship rats (Rattus rattus) and stoats (Mustela erminea) identified as the primary agents responsible for their ongoing decline. Extensive efforts to suppress these pests across New Zealand’s forests have created “management experiments” with potential to provide insights into the ecological forces structuring forest bird communities. To understand the effects of invasive mammals on birds, I studied responses of New Zealand bird species at different temporal and spatial scales to different intensities of control and residual densities of mammals. In my first empirical chapter (Chapter 2), I present two meta-analyses of bird responses to invasive mammal control. I collate data from biodiversity projects across New Zealand where long-term monitoring of arboreal bird species was undertaken.
  • Taxa Names List 6-30-21

    Taxa Names List 6-30-21

    Insects and Related Organisms Sorted by Taxa Updated 6/30/21 Order Family Scientific Name Common Name A ACARI Acaridae Acarus siro Linnaeus grain mite ACARI Acaridae Aleuroglyphus ovatus (Troupeau) brownlegged grain mite ACARI Acaridae Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Fumouze & Robin) bulb mite ACARI Acaridae Suidasia nesbitti Hughes scaly grain mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrolichus casei Oudemans cheese mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) mold mite ACARI Analgidae Megninia cubitalis (Mégnin) Feather mite ACARI Argasidae Argas persicus (Oken) Fowl tick ACARI Argasidae Ornithodoros turicata (Dugès) relapsing Fever tick ACARI Argasidae Otobius megnini (Dugès) ear tick ACARI Carpoglyphidae Carpoglyphus lactis (Linnaeus) driedfruit mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex bovis Stiles cattle Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex brevis Bulanova lesser Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex canis Leydig dog Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex caprae Railliet goat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex cati Mégnin cat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex equi Railliet horse Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex folliculorum (Simon) Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex ovis Railliet sheep Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex phylloides Csokor hog Follicle mite ACARI Dermanyssidae Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer) chicken mite ACARI Eriophyidae Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa) grain rust mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus essigi (Hassan) redberry mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus gossypii (Banks) cotton blister mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus vaccinii
  • Foraging Ecology of the Red-Crowned Parakeet ( Cyanoramphus

    Foraging Ecology of the Red-Crowned Parakeet ( Cyanoramphus

    GREENE:TERRY C. GREENEFORAGING1 ECOLOGY OF PARAKEETS 161 Zoology Department, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1, New Zealand. 1Present address: Northern Regional Science Unit, Science and Research Unit, S.T.I.S., Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68-908, Newton, Auckland, New Zealand. FORAGING ECOLOGY OF THE RED-CROWNED PARAKEET (CYANORAMPHUS NOVAEZELANDIAE NOVAEZELANDIAE) AND YELLOW-CROWNED PARAKEET (C. AURICEPS AURICEPS) ON LITTLE BARRIER ISLAND, HAURAKI GULF, NEW ZEALAND __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary: The diet of red-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae novaezelandiae) and yellow- crowned parakeets (C. auriceps auriceps) was compared on Little Barrier Island, New Zealand between 1986 and 1987. Significant dietary differences were observed in these sympatric, congeneric species. Yellow- crowned parakeets ate significantly more invertebrates than red-crowned parakeets, which fed on a greater variety of plant foods. Red-crowned parakeets were found in all vegetation types depending on the availability of food and were commonly seen foraging on the ground in open habitats. In contrast, yellow- crowned parakeets were more arboreal and showed distinct preferences for forested habitats. The existence of both parakeet species in sympatry is examined as is the ecological importance of invertebrate food sources. Observed differences in the behaviour and ecology of parakeet species on Little Barrier Island
  • Mites and Ticks

    Mites and Ticks

    CHAPTER 3 MITES AND TICKS LEARNING OBJECTIVES After you finish studying this chapter, you ■ Know where mites and ticks are typically should be able to: found on agricultural animal’s bodies. ■ Describe how mites and ticks differ from ■ Describe integrated programs for controlling insects. mites and ticks. ■ Understand the ways that mites can nega- ■ Understand the basic life cycles of ticks. tively affect animal health. ■ Describe the appearance of a tick. ■ Explain what mange is and how it occurs. ■ List some of the important tick pests of ■ Explain the generalized life cycle of mites. animals. ■ List several mites that affect agricultural animals. Chapter one of this manual gives specific infor- mation on biology and identification of pests hand lens. Figure 3.1 shows a schematic view of including insects and other arthropods. Review the general anatomy of a mite. Note that the feed- that information to learn arthropod external char- ing apparatus of a mite is called the hypostome. It acteristics, life cycles, and ways that they cause contains the chelicerae and the paired palpi (sin- damage and act as pests. gular, palpus). The four pairs of legs are seg- mented, and each joins the body at the coxa. MITES There are more than 200 families of mites and many thousands of species. Most mites are free- hypostome living and feed on plant juices or prey upon other arthropods. Some mites have evolved to become important ectoparasitic pests of animals. Some species of mites have even become endoparasites, coxa invading the ears, bronchi and lungs, nose and other tissues of animals.
  • New Zealand's Orange-Fronted Parakeet, Or Kakariki, Has Only

    New Zealand's Orange-Fronted Parakeet, Or Kakariki, Has Only

    Text and pictures by Rosemary Low The Orange-fronted Parakeet occurs only in one patch of beech forest in South island New Zealand’s Orange-fronted Parakeet, or Kakariki, has only recently been recognised as a separate and distinct species. Now it is close to extinction. Is the action now being undertaken a case of much too little, much too late? he least known member of the genus Cyanoramphus is a that the Orange-fronted Parakeet is a distinct species and somewhat mysterious bird. Now it is threatened with that it is most closely related to the Red-fronted Kakariki Textinction. The Orange-fronted Parakeet, also known as (C. novaezelandiae). Malherbe’s Parakeet (C. malherbi), is very close in appearance to the Yellow-fronted Kakariki (C. auriceps). Indeed, for many years “The Orange-fronted was given the status it was the subject of debate by systematists - was it just a colour morph or was it a true species? It occurs in the same areas as of Endangered (due to its small range and the Yellow-fronted Kakariki but no mixed pairs have been population) as soon as it was classified recorded - so the birds apparently recognise each other as as a separate species” separate species. In recent years mitochondrial DNA work has been used to Given the status of Endangered (due to its small range and settle arguments over taxonomic identity. In this case it indicated population) as soon as it was classified as a separate species, it is known to be from only two valleys in the South Island of New Zealand.
  • Camacho-Escobar Et Al 2014 Ectoparasites Backyard Turkeys

    Camacho-Escobar Et Al 2014 Ectoparasites Backyard Turkeys

    Available online at http://scik.org European Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2014, 2014:7 ISSN 2051-297X ECTOPARASITES AND THEIR DAMAGE IN BACKYARD TURKEYS IN OAXACA’S COAST, MEXICO MARCO ANTONIO CAMACHO-ESCOBAR1,*, JAIME ARROYO-LEDEZMA1, NARCISO YSAC ÁVILA-SERRANO1, MARTHA PATRICIA JEREZ-SALAS2, EDGAR IVÁN SÁNCHEZ-BERNAL1, JUAN CARLOS GARCÍA-LÓPEZ3 1Cuerpo Académico Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad del Mar. Puerto Escondido, Oaxaca 71980, México 2Instituto Tecnológico del Valle de Oaxaca, Ex Hacienda de Nazareno Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca 3Instituto de Investigación en Zonas Desérticas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México Copyright © 2014 Camacho-Escobar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract: The ectoparasites are major animal health problems in poultry farms, can be a health problem for themselves or vectors of various etiologic agents of disease. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to describe the main effects of the domestic turkey ectoparasites obtained from traditional breeding in backyard. Seventy five turkeys were examined backyard; the ectoparasites were collected for identification. Menopon gallinae, Menacanthus cornutus, Oxylipeurus polytrapezius, Menacanthus stramineus, Chelopistes meleagridis, Oxylipeurus corpulentus, and Colpocephalum turbinatum, lice species are identified. The last two are reported for the first time in domestic turkeys. Mites identified were Dermanyssus gallinae, Megninia ginglymura, Ornithonyssus sylviarum, and Knemidokoptes mutans. This is the largest list of ectoparasites in turkeys wild or domesticated reported until today. The lesions found were plucking dermatitis, skin irritation, mild to moderate, in the case of avian scabies severe injuries below the scaly skin of legs and tarsi.
  • 2017 Wellington Project Kaka Report(PDF, 314

    2017 Wellington Project Kaka Report(PDF, 314

    EPA Report: Verified Source: Pestlink Operational Report for Possum, Ship rat Control in the Project Kaka 01 Mar 2017 - 17 Mar 2017 11/08/2017 Department of Conservation Wairarapa Contents 1. Operation Summary Operation Name Possum, Ship rat Control in Project Kaka Operation Date 01 Mar 2017 - 17 Mar 2017 District Wairarapa Region: Lower North Island Pestlink Reference 1617WRP01 Treatment Area Project Kaka Size (ha) 29288.00 Conservation Unit Name(s) GA Id(s) Tararua Forest Park 2795245 Treatment Block Details Treatment Blocks Size (ha) Grid Ref GIS Ref Project Kaka 29288.00 BP33 Contractor Name Beck Helicopter Ltd Treatment Dates Start Completion Project Kaka 01 Mar 2017 17 Mar 2017 Target Pest Details Target Treatment Blocks Control Method Name Pests Project Kaka Possum, Pesticide Aerial Pesticide - Aerial in Project Kaka- Ship rat (1) Conservation Outcome(s) Project Kaka (PK) aims to restore the diverse native forest bird, insect and plant communities in Tararua Forest Park. PK is an intensive 10 year pest control and monitoring programme, DOC and other organisations and volunteers are working together to target species that are the biggest threat to native bird life and forest systems. The Project Kaka zone covers the most used areas of the park, so that as many people as possible will experience the expected improvement in forest health and increase in bird life. It includes a diverse range of forest types including fertile river valleys and higher altitude beech, kamahi and fuchsia forests. Improved canopy condition and tree survival, most palatable canopy forest species will be protected. Increased abundance of fruit/seed in the year following treatment.