DOCSLIB.ORG

Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Different Ethnic, Climatic and Fasting Risk Factors for Morbidity in Al-Ain Medical District, United Arab Emirates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Different Ethnic, Climatic and Fasting Risk Factors for Morbidity in Al-Ain Medical District, United Arab Emirates Original Article Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Different Ethnic, Climatic and Fasting Risk Factors for Morbidity in Al-Ain Medical District, United Arab Emirates Fawaz Chikh Torab, Mohamed Amer, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan and Frank James Branicki, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, UAE. AIM: To evaluate risk factors, morbidity and mortality rates of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) and to inves- tigate factors affecting postoperative complications of PPU. BACKGROUND: The incidence of PPU has remained constant, simple closure with omental patch repair being the mainstay of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients admitted to Al-Ain Hospital with PPU between January 2000 and March 2004 was studied retrospectively; two with deficient data were excluded from the analysis. Logistic regression was used to define factors affecting postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 35.3 years (range, 20–65). 45.7% of patients were Bangladeshi, and 85.3% originated from the Indian subcontinent. One patient, subsequently found to have a perfo- rated gastric cancer, died. In 116 patients, 26 complications were recorded in 20 patients (17.2%). Common risk factors for perforation were smoking, history of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A significantly increased risk of perforation was evident during the daytime fasting month of Ramadan. An increase in the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score (p = 0.047) and a reduced white blood cell count (0.04) were highly significant for the prediction of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Patients with dyspeptic symptoms and a history of previous PUD should be considered for prophylactic treatment to prevent ulcer recurrence during prolonged daytime fasting in Ramadan, especially during the winter time. [Asian J Surg 2009;32(2):95–101] Key Words: peptic ulcer, perforation Introduction e.g. smoking,3 NSAID use, a previous history of PUD, Helicobacter pylori infection4 and alcohol intake have dif- Although morbidity from peptic ulcer disease (PUD) ferent prevalence rates in differing communities and is decreasing in the west, the incidence of perforated affect the incidence of perforation in various ways with ulcer remains relatively constant.1,2 Perforated ulcers are additive effects of multiple factors.5–7 We observed in our decreasing in incidence in younger age patients and practice different epidemiological characteristics of pep- are increasingly being observed in the elderly and in tic ulcer perforation other than those evident in western women.1,2 Different risk factors for PUD and perforation societies. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Frank James Branicki, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 17666, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates. E-mail: [email protected] ● Date of acceptance: 5 December 2008 © 2009 Elsevier. All rights reserved. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY VOL 32 • NO 2 • APRIL 2009 95 ■ TORAB et al ■ Following developments in the medical treatment of postoperative death, thus the mortality rate was 1/117 PUD in the last two decades, surgical intervention is cur- (0.9%). This patient had a diagnosis of perforated gastric rently confined to the treatment of complicated disease, cancer and was excluded from the statistics of the study as namely, ulcer haemorrhage, perforation and obstruction.8 the disease had different etiology and morbidity. Of the Simple closure or omental patch repair is the mainstay of other 116 patients, 114 were male (98.3%). The mean age of treatment of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU),9–11 definitive patients was 35.3 years (range, 20–65). No patient had surgery being rarely practised12 with dependence now chronic cardiac, pulmonary or hepatic dysfunction. Renal on medical therapy to complete the healing process and dysfunction was evident in two patients (1.7%), hypertension prevent recurrence of the disease.10,13–15 occurred in three (2.6%), and four had diabetes mellitus In this retrospective study we reviewed our PPU admis- (3.4%). None had significant organ dysfunction or failure. sions during a 4-year period to identify risk factors in this particular community, determine our morbidity and mor- Management tality rates and study factors affecting postoperative com- All patients were treated, first by resuscitation, then plications of PPU including Boey16 and APACHE II scores.17 open laparotomy, peritoneal toilet and closure of the per- foration employing an omental patch. Postoperatively, Patients and methods intravenous antibiotics were used for 3–5 days. One hundred and thirteen patients (97.4%) received postop- This is a retrospective study of the medical records of all erative oral eradication therapy with Amoxicillin 1 g twice adult patients admitted to the Department of Surgery at daily, Clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 1–2 weeks Al-Ain Hospital with the diagnosis of a perforated peptic plus Omeprazole (Losec) 20 mg twice daily for 10 days. ulcer which was confirmed intraoperatively during the period from 1 January 2000 to 31 March 2004. After Intraoperative findings defining our objectives and reviewing the literature, we Ulceration in the duodenal bulb was found in 107 of 116 designed a documentation sheet to collect data necessary patients (92.2%) there being only one ulcer in the second to complete the study. We obtained the approval of the part of the duodenum, six prepyloric ulcers and two gas- Research Ethics Committee and the Head of the tric ulcers. The patient who died had a perforation in an Department of Surgery and the Medical Records section adenocarcinoma; the only case of malignant ulceration in to undertake the study. The data were collected from the study and this patient was excluded from our analy- patients’ charts anonymously and documented. sis. Ulcer size was only documented in 109 patients; in seven patients it was not recorded. The mean diameter Inclusion criteria was 5.2 mm (range, 1–20). All patients > 18 years of age admitted during the period of the study with operatively confirmed PPU. Postoperative course The range of postoperative hospital stay was 3–26 days, Exclusion criteria the mean ± SD being 7.6 ± 3 days. The patient who stayed Patients with (a) association of bleeding and perforation, 26 days developed postoperative pleural effusion, pneu- (b) immunodeficiency arising from any cause apart from monia, liver abscess, and sepsis. He was treated by percu- diabetes mellitus, (c) vital data missing from the medical taneous drainage of the effusion and the abscess in records or (d) pregnancy. addition to antibiotic therapy. The patient who stayed only 3 days left at his own request and against advice as Patients he planned to travel to his home country. Demographic data One hundred and nineteen patients had been treated, two Postoperative morbidity of whom were excluded; in one case a lost medical record Postoperative complications including organ dysfunction could not be retrieved despite every effort being made and or failure were defined according to the published in the other, operative notes were missing from the definitions of Deithch et al.18 Twenty patients (17.2%) patient’s file. In the remaining 117 patients there was one developed postoperative complications. The most 96 ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY VOL 32 • NO 2 • APRIL 2009 ■ PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER ■ common were respiratory complications, which occurred regression model was used to define factors related to in 12 patients (10.3%). Cardiac complications occurred in postoperative complications.19,20 The outcome variable of two patients (1.7%), intra-abdominal infection including the logistic model was whether the patient had postoper- pelvic and right iliac fossa collections, and liver abscess ative complications or not and the factors which were occurred in three patients (2.5%). Wound infection was entered into the logistic model as covariates were factors diagnosed in two patients (1.7%). Seven patients (6%) that had a p value of less than 0.05 in the univariate analy- experienced other complications. Morbidity encountered sis. Different direct logistic models have been tried and in these patients included paralytic ileus (two), uremia explored until the best model was found and presented. with convulsions (one), confusion with hallucination (one), Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the diarrhea (one), and a hypotensive episode with dehydration Social Sciences (version 15, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). (one). One patient had a postoperative “acute abdomen” For all analyses, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. and was found to have gangrenous small bowel possibly due to hypotension with non occlusion of mesenteric ves- Results sels on Angio computed tomography (CT). He underwent small bowel resection and right hemicolectomy. Fifteen Risk factors related to the incidence of the disease patients each had a single complication, four patients Seasonal distribution of admissions each had two complications and one patient had three The number of patients with PPU admitted during the complications. winter months of November to February was four cases per month. This was higher than the rate of 1.34 cases per Follow up endoscopy month in non winter months (Table 1). The number of The plan of the study, and according to the policy of the patients admitted during the fasting month of Ramadan hospital, was to follow up all patients with PPU with (27 patients) (Table 2) was significantly higher than the endoscopy, to exclude a persistent peptic ulcers. Patient demographics are explained by the fact that most of our Table 1. Frequency of admissions per month patients are heavy manual workers on camp sites or con- Month of Total number Rate of admission struction sites based out of town, who may leave the coun- admission of admissions per month try after having an operation. Only 25 patients came for follow up endoscopy (21.6%). The remaining patients January* 16 3.2 failed to attend (78.4%).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perforated Ulcers Shaleen Sathe, MS4 Christina Lebedis, MD CASE HISTORY
    Perforated Ulcers Shaleen Sathe, MS4 Christina LeBedis, MD CASE HISTORY 54-year-old male with known history of hypertension presents with 2 days of acute onset abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, with periumbilical tenderness and abdominal distention on exam, without guarding or rebound tenderness. Labs, including CBC, CMP, and lipase, were unremarkable in the emergency department. Radiograph Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Radiograph of the chest in the AP projection shows large amount of free air under diaphragm (blue arrows), suggestive of intraperitoneal hollow viscus perforation. CT Perforated Duodenal Ulcer CT of the abdomen in the axial projection (I+, O-), at the level of the inferior liver edge, shows large amount of intraperitoneal free air (blue arrows) in lung window (b), and submucosal edema in the gastric antrum and duodenal bulb (red arrows), suggestive of a diagnosis of perforated bowel, most likely in the region of the duodenum. US Perforated Gastric Ulcer US of the abdomen shows perihepatic fluid (blue arrow) and free fluid in the right paracolic gutter (not shown), concerning for intraperitoneal pathology. Radiograph Perforated Gastric Ulcer Supine radiograph of the abdomen shows multiple air- filled dilated loops of large bowel, with air lucencies on both sides of the sigmoid colon wall (green arrows), consistent with Rigler sign and perforation. CT Perforated Gastric Ulcer CT of the abdomen in the axial (a) and sagittal (b) projections (I+, O-) shows diffuse wall thickening of the gastric body and antrum (green arrows) with an ulcerating lesion along the posterior wall of the stomach (red arrows), and free air tracking adjacent to the stomach (blue arrow), concerning for gastric ulcer perforation.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergent Repair of a Perforated Giant Duodenal Ulcer in a Patient with an Unmanaged Ulcer History
    Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12198 Emergent Repair of a Perforated Giant Duodenal Ulcer in a Patient With an Unmanaged Ulcer History Eli B. Eisman 1, 2 , Nicole C. Jamieson 2 , Rashona A. Moss 3 , Melina M. Henderson 4 , Richard C. Spinale 2 1. College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA 2. General Surgery, Garden City Hospital, Garden City, USA 3. Internal Medicine, Garden City Hospital, Garden City, USA 4. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Garden City Hospital, Garden City, USA Corresponding author: Eli B. Eisman, [email protected] Abstract Giant duodenal ulcers (GDUs) are full-thickness disruptions of the gastrointestinal epithelium greater than 3cm in diameter. The significant size and disease chronicity lead to deleterious outcomes and high mortality risk if ulcer progression is not halted. While still prevalent in developing countries, GDUs are increasingly rare in industrialized nations. Here, we present the case of an 82-year-old woman with perforated GDU requiring emergent surgical intervention complicated by prior duodenal surgery requiring a previously unreported triple-layered omental patch. Discussion of this technique and novel approaches to GDU repair ensue. Categories: Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology, General Surgery Keywords: complicated peptic ulcer disease, duodenal ulcers, duodenal ulceration, perforated duodenal ulcer, gastrointestinal perforation, chronic ulcer, graham patch repair Introduction Giant duodenal ulcers (GDUs) were first characterized in 1931, though initially difficult to diagnose on barium study due to the mistaken identification of ulcers as deformed duodenal caps [1]. Nussbaum and Schusterman codified GDUs as full-thickness ulcers greater than 2cm, usually involving but not limited to the duodenal bulb [2].
    [Show full text]
  • THE ACUTE ABDOMEN Definition Abdominal ​Pain​ of Short Duration
    THE ACUTE ABDOMEN Definition Abdominal pain of short duration that is usually associated with muscular rigidity, distension and vomiting, ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ and which requires a decision whether an emergent operation is required. Problems and management options History and physical examination are central in the evaluation of the acute abdomen. However, in an ICU patient, these are often limited by sedation, paralysis and mechanical ventilation, and obscured by a protracted, complicated in­hospital course. Often an acute abdomen is inferred from unexplained sepsis, hypovolaemia and abdominal distension. The need for prompt diagnosis and early treatment by no means equates with operative management. While it is a truism that correct diagnosis is the essential preliminary to correct treatment, this is probably more so in non­operative management. On occasions, the need for operation is more obvious than the diagnosis and no delay should be incurred in an attempt to confirm the diagnosis before surgery. Frequently fluid resuscitation ​ ​ and antibiotics are required concurrently with the evaluation process. ​ ​ The approach is to evaluate the ICU patient in the context of the underlying disorder and decide on one of the following options: ∙ Immediate operation (surgery now)– the ‘bleeder’ e.g. ruptured ectopic pregnancy, ruptured abdominal ​ ​ aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the salvageable patient ∙ Emergent operation (surgery tonight)– the ‘septic’ e.g. generalized peritonitis from perforated viscus ​ ​ ∙ Early operation (surgery tomorrow)– the ‘obstructed’, e.g. obstructed colonic cancer ​ ​ ∙ Radiologically guided drainage – e.g. localized abscesses, acalculous cholecystitis, pyonephrosis ​ ​ ​ ∙ Active observation and frequent re­evaluation – e.g localized peritoneal signs other than in the RLQ, ​ ​ ​ selected cases of endoscopic perforation .
    [Show full text]
  • PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER. Patient Usually Experiences
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.12.134.470 on 1 December 1936. Downloaded from 470 POST-GRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL December, 1936 PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER. By RONALD W. RAVEN, F.R.C.S. (Assistant Surgeon to T'he French Hospital, Assistant Surgeon to The Gordon Hospital for Rectal Diseases and Swrgical Registrar to The Royal Cancer Hospital.) INTRODUCTION. Peptic ulceration is a crippling disease judged from the stand-point of morbidity, and is also dangerous to life on account of serious complications, such as haemorrhage or perforation which may supervene during the course of the disease. These complications may occur in any patient and there are no criteria which will indicate whether or not an ulcer will bleed or perforate. When the treatment of peptic ulceration is under review it must be remembered that from 20 to 30 per cent. of these ulcers perforate. In a large series of cases I found that the incidence of perforation was 27 per cent. It is thus essential that patients suffering with peptic ulcer should be kept under continuous careful observation. Unfortunately, however, a small percentage of patients give no previous history of the peptic ulcer syndrome and perforation of the ulcer is the first indication of its presence. Recently, when considering the role of surgery in the treatment of chronic peptic ulcer, Joll stated that there has been a rise in the incidence of perforation as a complication of peptic ulcer since medical treatment has become systematized in the treatment of this disease. It must also be remembered that medical treat- Protected by copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Duodenal Ulcer an Alternative Therapeutic Plan
    SPECIAL ARTICLE Perforated Duodenal Ulcer An Alternative Therapeutic Plan Arthur J. Donovan, MD; Thomas V. Berne, MD; John A. Donovan, MD n alternative plan for the treatment of a perforated duodenal ulcer is proposed. We will focus on the now-recognized role of Helicobacter pylori in the genesis of the ma- jority of duodenal ulcers and on the high rate of success of therapy with a combina- tion of antibiotics and a proton-pump inhibitor or histamine2 blocker in treatment of suchA ulcers. Knowledge that half the cases of perforated duodenal ulcer may have securely sealed spontaneously at the time of presentation is incorporated in the therapeutic plan. Patients with a perforated duodenal ulcer who have already been evaluated for H pylori and are not infected or, if infected, have received appropriate therapy should undergo an ulcer-definitive operation if they are suitable surgical candidates. Most authorities recommend surgical closure of the perforation and a parietal cell vagotomy. The remaining patients should have a gastroduodenogram with water- soluble contrast medium. If the perforation is sealed, the patient can be treated nonsurgically. If the perforation is leaking, secure surgical closure of the perforation is necessary. Following recov- ery from the immediate consequences of the perforation, evaluation for H pylori should be con- ducted. If the patient is infected, combined medical therapy is recommended. If the patient is not infected, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome should be ruled out and medical therapy is recommended if the ulcer has not been treated previously. Elective ulcer-definitive surgery should be considered for the occasional uninfected patient who has already received appropriate medical therapy for the ulcer.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT of ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN Patrick Mcgonagill, MD, FACS 4/7/21 DISCLOSURES
    MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN Patrick McGonagill, MD, FACS 4/7/21 DISCLOSURES • I have no pertinent conflicts of interest to disclose OBJECTIVES • Define the pathophysiology of abdominal pain • Identify specific patterns of abdominal pain on history and physical examination that suggest common surgical problems • Explore indications for imaging and escalation of care ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (1) HISTORICAL VIGNETTE (2) • “The general rule can be laid down that the majority of severe abdominal pains that ensue in patients who have been previously fairly well, and that last as long as six hours, are caused by conditions of surgical import.” ~Cope’s Early Diagnosis of the Acute Abdomen, 21st ed. BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE DIAGNOSIS AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ABDOMINAL PAIN • Listen to your (and the patient’s) gut. A well honed “Spidey Sense” will get you far. • Management of intraabdominal surgical problems are time sensitive • Narcotics will not mask peritonitis • Urgent need for surgery often will depend on vitals and hemodynamics • If in doubt, reach out to your friendly neighborhood surgeon. Septic Pain Sepsis Death Shock PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ABDOMINAL PAIN VISCERAL PAIN • Severe distension or strong contraction of intraabdominal structure • Poorly localized • Typically occurs in the midline of the abdomen • Seems to follow an embryological pattern • Foregut – epigastrium • Midgut – periumbilical • Hindgut – suprapubic/pelvic/lower back PARIETAL/SOMATIC PAIN • Caused by direct stimulation/irritation of parietal peritoneum • Leads to localized
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Associated with Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug 56 Administration in a Dairy Cow
    Gomes et al; Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Associated with Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug 56 Administration in a Dairy Cow. Braz J Vet Pathol; 2008, 1(2): 56 - 58 Case Report Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Associated with Nonsteroidal Anti- inflammatory Drug Administration in a Dairy Cow Danilo C. Gomes1, Denise M. Murakawa1, Mary S. Varaschin1*, Flademir Wouters1, Leonardo P. Mesquita1, Micaela Guidotti1, Amanda M. Nogueira1, João C. Resende Júnior2 1Laboratório de Patologia Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), MG, Brazil2Departamento de Medicina Veterinária (UFLA), MG, Brazil *Corresponding author: Mary S. Varaschin, Laboratório de Patologia Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, UFLA, 37.200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil. Phone: 55 35 3829-1732 E-mail: [email protected] Submitted March 26th 2008, Accepted July 23rd 2008 Abstract A case report of perforated duodenal ulcer in a 4.5 year-old Holstein cow is presented. The cow was treated with an overdose of diclofenac sodium. Necropsy findings included diffuse fibrinous peritonitis and microscopically there was severe necrosis and acute inflammation of the duodenum at the margin of the ulcer. Although gastrointestinal ulcers are often associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in others species, it is rarely described in cattle. Key Words: duodenal ulcer, diclofenac, bovine, NSAID. Introduction inflammatory processes, such as mastitis by Staphylococcus aureus (18). Duodenal ulcer is rarely Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs described in cattle associated with the use of NSAID (16). (NSAIDs) are effective therapeutic agents with analgesic, The toxicity of diclofenac in calves was investigated in anti-inflammatory and antipyretic properties, their use is India. Nine to 11 month-old calves received diclofenac associated with a significant incidence of side-effects, sodium 3mg/kg twice daily orally for four days and were including gastrointestinal bleeding, ulceration and necropsied at the fifth day.
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers: Treatment Options
    International Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Journal Review Article Open Access Perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers: treatment options Abstract Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2018 This paper focuses on a prospective nonrandomized review of patients undergoing Shamil V Timerbulatov, Vil M Timerbulatov, RI surgery for perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers. Khisamutdinova, Makhmud V Timerbulatov Patients and methods: A total of 198 patients with perforated gastric and duodenal Department of Surgery, Bashkir State Medical University, Russia ulcers were enrolled in the study between 2011 and 2016. The mean age of patients was 42 years. The disease was more common in men (87.3%) than in women (12.6%). Correspondence: Shamil V Timerbulatov, Department of The incidence of duodenal ulcer perforation was 86.3%. Anti-helicobacter therapy Surgery, Bashkir State Medical University, Russia, Email [email protected] was administered to 33.8% of patients before perforation. In 5.6% of cases, recurrent ulcer perforation was established. The majority of patients (78.8 %) were admitted Received: January 31, 2018 | Published: February 26, 2018 within the first 12 hours, while 7.5% - 24 hours after perforation. The APACHE II scoring system was used to measure shock in 5.5% of cases. A score up to 6 was determined in 37.8% of patients, up to 12 - in 47.9%, higher scores (more than 12) were measured in the remaining patients. Physical examination and diagnosis included clinical methods, abdominal X-ray, gastroduodenoscopy, ultrasound, laparoscopy, and the Boey risk scores. Results: Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 79.3% of patients, the diagnosis of concealed perforation was confirmed by gastroduodenoscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Peptic Ulcer & Its Association with Vascular Anatomy
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 16, Issue 5 Ver. IV (May. 2017), PP 16-18 www.iosrjournals.org Perforated Peptic Ulcer & Its Association with Vascular Anatomy of Stomach & Duodenum Dr.Dharmendra Kumar 1, Pratik Shahil 2 1Associate Proffessor, Department of Anatomy, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences , Ranchi 2Final year MBBS student , Kasturba Medical College , Mangalore Abstract Objective: To correlate clinical presentation of perforated peptic ulcer and the surgical approach used with the site of perforation. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on diagnosed 52 patients of perforated peptic ulcer at the Department of surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore for a period of 1 year from January 2015 to December 2015 The details of all patients who were diagnosed and operated for PPU were retrieved retrospectively from medical record department and operation theater records. Case history and detailed clinical examination of patients were evaluated. Conclusion: Site of the ulcer as reported by endoscopic assessment determines the clinical presentation and overall outconme of the patient. I. Introduction Peptic ulcer disease (PUD), is a break in the lining of the stomach, first part of the small intestine, or occasionally the lower esophagus. The most common symptoms of a duodenal ulcer are waking at night with upper abdominal pain or upper abdominal pain that improves with eating. With a gastric ulcer the pain may worsen with eating.[ The pain is often described as a burning or dull ache. Other symptoms include belching, vomiting, weight loss, or poor appetite. About a third of older people have no symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Peptic Ulcer 17 Moshe Schein
    Perforated Peptic Ulcer 17 Moshe Schein – There’s a hole in my bucket…How should I mend it? – Just patch it! (a folk song) “Every doctor, faced with a perforated ulcer of the stomach or intestine, must consider opening the abdomen, sewing up the hole, and averting a possible or actual inflammation by careful cleansing of the abdominal cavity.” (Johan Mikulicz-Radecki, 1850–1905) Thanks to effective, modern anti-ulcer drug management the incidence of perforated peptic ulcers has decreased drastically, but not everywhere. Perforated ulcers are still common in the socio-economically disadvantaged or stressed popu- lations worldwide. Usually perforations develop against the background of chronic symptomatic ulceration but de novo presentation without previous history is not uncommon.In the Western World perforated duodenal ulcers (DU) are much more common than perforated gastric ulcers (GU), which are seen more in lower socio- economic groups. Natural History Classically, the abdominal pain caused by a peptic perforation develops very suddenly in the upper abdomen. Most patients can accurately time the dramatic onset of symptoms.The natural history of such an episode can be divided into three phases: Chemical peritonitis/contamination. Initially, the perforation leads to chem- ical peritonitis,with or without contamination with micro-organisms.(Note that the presence of acid sterilizes gastroduodenal contents; it is when gastric acid is reduced by treatment or disease (e.g. gastric cancer) that bacteria and fungi are present in the stomach and duodenum).Spillage of gastroduodenal contents is usually diffuse but may be localized in the upper abdomen by adhesions or the omentum. Spillage along the right gutter into the right lower quadrant, mimicking acute appendicitis, is mentioned in every textbook but almost never seen in clinical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Reactive Acalculous Cholecystitis Secondary to Duodenal Ulcer Perforation
    Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4331 Acute Reactive Acalculous Cholecystitis Secondary to Duodenal Ulcer Perforation Shab E Gul Rahim 1 , Mohammad Alomari 2 , Shrouq Khazaaleh 2 , Ahmed Alomari 3 , Laith A. Al Momani 4 1. Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, USA 2. Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, USA 3. Internal Medicine, The Hashmite University, Al-Zarqa, JOR 4. Internal Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA Corresponding author: Shab E Gul Rahim, [email protected] Disclosures can be found in Additional Information at the end of the article Abstract Acute cholecystitis is the inflammation of the gallbladder, classically caused by gall stones obstructing the cystic duct. In contrast, acalculous cholecystitis is a gallbladder inflammation occurring in the absence of cholelithiasis with a reported prevalence of 10% of all cases of acute cholecystitis. Reactive acalculous cholecystitis is an extremely rare subset of this disease that results from an adjacent inflammatory or infectious intra-abdominal process that may lead to gallbladder stasis, ischemia, and subsequent wall inflammation. Many factors have been associated with acalculous cholecystitis, including (but not limited to) hemodynamic instability, altered immunity, and biliary tree anomalies. Lack of specific signs and symptoms of this particular entity often delays the diagnosis. Herein, we present a rare case of acute, reactive, acalculous cholecystitis secondary to a perforated duodenal ulcer found incidentally during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Categories: Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology Keywords: acute acalculous cholecystitis, duodenal ulcer, cholelithiasis, prostaglandins Introduction Acute cholecystitis, as the name implies, is an inflammation of the gallbladder. It is secondary to gallstones in 90% - 95% of the cases where, classically, ductal obstruction by the gall stone leads to distension and edema of the gallbladder [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Artigo Original 2009;22(1):15-8
    15 ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig Artigo Original 2009;22(1):15-8 TEn-YEARS COMPARATIVE STUDY AFTER SURGICAL TREATMEnT OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER ACCORDInG TO ULCER RELAPSE BETWEEn h. PYLORI POSITIVE, AFTER ERADICATIOn, AnD nEGATIVE PATIEnTS Estudo comparativo quanto à recidiva ulcerosa do tratamento cirúrgico de úlcera péptica perfurada entre pacientes H. Pylori positivos, após erradicação, e negativos Rosa Pachaly DALCIN, Cristiano Antoniazzi ABAID, Paola M. ALMEIDA, Samia B. ADAIME, Thiza Massaia LONDERO, Lucas V. GAI ABCDDV/632 Souza FO, Dalcin SR, Dalcin RP, Abaid CA, Almeida PM, Adaime SB, Londero TM, Gai LV. Ten-years comparative study after surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer according to ulcer relapse between H. Pylori positive, after eradication, and negative patients. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig 2009;22(1):15-8 ABSTRACT – Background - The surgical treatment for perforated peptic ulcer is still a matter of discussion. The surgeons, for many years, made their options between acid-reducing procedures with some morbi-mortality and simpler procedures like closure of the perforation. But, in these cases, were faced with a high chance of ulcer relapse. Since the proved link between peptic ulcer and gastroduodenal infection caused by H. pylori, a recommendation for a change in their attitudes going back to simpler procedures with eradication of the bacteria was done. Aim – To analyse ulcer recurrence in patients treated with the same surgical procedure but belonging to two different groups: positive and negative to H. pilori. Methods – A total of 144 patients were treated with simple closure of their perforated pre-pyloric, pyloric and duodenal ulcers.
    [Show full text]