Agenda Frontsheet 24/05/2011, 18.15

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agenda Frontsheet 24/05/2011, 18.15 Public Document Pack LEGAL & DEMOCRATIC SERVICES Linda Fisher Service Director COMMITTEE SERVICES SECTION PO Box 15, Town Hall, Rochdale OL16 1AB Telephone: Rochdale (01706) 647474 Fax: Rochdale (01706) 924705 www.rochdale.gov.uk To: All Members of Pennines Your Ref: Township Committee Our Ref: Enquiries to: Michael Garraway Extension: 4716 Date: 11 th May 2011 Dear Councillor PENNINES TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE You are requested to attend the meeting of Pennines Township Committee to be held in St. James Primary School, Crossfield Road, Wardle, Rochdale, OL12 9JW on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 commencing at 6.15 pm. The agenda and supporting papers are attached. If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please contact staff in the Committee Services Section at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Yours faithfully Linda Fisher Service Director Pennines Township Committee Membership 2011/12 Councillor Jean Ashworth Councillor Martin Burke Councillor Robert Clegg Councillor Janet Darnbrough Councillor Irene Davidson Councillor Ashley Dearnley Councillor Peter Ernest Evans Councillor Aftab Hussain Councillor Andy Kelly Councillor Stephanie Mills Councillor Martin Eric Rodgers Councillor Ann Stott 1 ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL PENNINES TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE Tuesday, 24 May 2011 at 6.15 pm St. James Primary School, Crossfield Road, Wardle, Rochdale, OL12 9JW A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 1. Appointment of Chair 2011/12 2. Appointment of Vice - Chair 2011/12 3. Apologies for Absence 4. Declarations of Interest 5. OPEN FORUM (6.15 p.m. - 6.45 p.m.) 6. Public Health White Paper 2010 - Presentation by the Director of Public Health (Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale PCT) MINUTES 7. Pennines Township Committee 8 March 2011 8. Pennines Township Planning Sub - Committee 16 March 2011 9. Pennines Township Planning Sub - Committee 14 April 2011 10. To note the proceedings of the Open Forum of the meeting held on 8 March 2011 ITEMS FOR DECISION 11. Appointment of Sub-Committees, Working Groups and Other Bodies for 2011/12 12. Pennines Township Committee, Sub-Committee and Delegation Arrangements for 2011/12 13. Traffic Regulation Order - Buckley Lane/Millgate 14. Waiting Restrictions and Revocation of existing Waiting Restrictions in Milnrow Town Centre and adjacent streets 15. Traffic Regulation Order for a Residents' Permit Parking Scheme - Hollingworth Lake, Littleborough 16. No Waiting at Any Time Restrictions, Lake Bank, Littleborough 17. Proposed Taxi Rank Locations - Littleborough Town Centre 18. Littleborough Town Centre Conservation Area - Proposed Variation of the North Boundary to include the Caldermoor PH & Hare Hill House & Park 19. School Governing Body Vacancies 2 ITEMS FOR INFORMATION 20. Littleborough Waterside - Progress report 21. Section 106 planning agreements (Development Contributions) 22. Review of Pennines Township Funds 3 This page is intentionally left blank Public Document Pack Agenda Item 7 PENNINES TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MEETING Tuesday, 8 March 2011 PRESENT: Councillor Darnbrough (In the Chair); Councillors Ashworth, Burke, Robert Clegg, Irene Davidson, Dearnley, Evans, Jones, Kelly, Kerslake (Vice-Chair), Mills and Swift OFFICERS: P. Sharp (Service Director Regeneration Service), A. Glover and A. Eadie (Planning & Regulation Service), A. Cooper (Learners and Young Peoples Service), P. Egan (Regeneration Service), I. Bentley (Performance & Transformation Service) and M. Garraway (Legal & Democratic Services) Also in Attendance: T. Wood, J. Grahamslaw and C. Thompson (Impact Partnership), J. Taylor (Link4Life). DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 79 There were no declarations of interest. WITHDRAWAL OF AGENDA ITEM 80 The Chair indicated that agenda item 14 – Pennines Township Year End report – would be withdrawn and will be considered at the next scheduled meeting of the Township Committee, on 24 th May 2011. OPEN FORUM (6.15PM -6.45PM) 81 The following items were raised by members of the public- a) Littleborough Parking Scheme Mr Johnson of Milnrow Road, Littleborough addressed the Township Committee detailing the unique position of his property and requesting the Council considers his application to be included in any future resident parking scheme. The Director of Highways responded that the application was under consideration and the request would be included. In addition a petition signed by 30 residents of Higher Cleggswood Avenue, Littleborough, requesting the Council introduce a parking control order on the said Avenue. The Petition was passed to The Director of Highways for consideration. b) Youth Nuisance Aly Cooper introduced herself to the Township Committee as the new Youth Service lead for the Township. A Member of the Township Committee commented on youths using motorbikes on land near Hollingworth High School and informed the Township Committee of a petition that had been submitted to the representative of the Regeneration Service for further investigation. Members noted the same issues had occurred at Barnes Meadows. Members of the Township Committee commended the Youth Service on the number and range of events available in the Pennines Township for young people during the recent half term. MINUTES Page 1 82 DECIDED – That the minutes of the meeting held on 11th January 2011 be approved as a correct record. OPEN FORUM OF THE MEETING HELD 11 JANUARY 2011 83 DECIDED – That the proceedings of the Open Forum held on 11 th January 2011 be noted. PENNINES TOWNSHIP PLANNING SUB --COMMITTEE HELD ON 14 DECEMBER 2010 84 DECIDED – That the minutes of the Pennines Township Planning Sub – Committee held on 14 th December 2010 be noted. PENNINES TOWNSHIP PLANNING SUB --COMMITTEE HELD ON 16 FEBRUARY 2011 85 DECIDED – That the minutes of the Pennines Township Planning Sub – Committee held on 16 th February 2011 be noted. PENNINES TOWNSHIP FUNDS GRANTS SUB --COMMITTEE HELD ON 9 FEBRUARY 2011 86 The Township Committee noted the exclusion of an approval of a grant in the sum of £2004 to the Youth Service which had been agreed at the meeting of the Pennines Funds Grants Sub – Committee held on 9 th February 2011. DECIDED – That with the additional of the item detailed above the minutes of the Pennines Township Funds Grants Sub – Committee held on 9 th February 2011 be noted. NOTES FROM THE PENNINES TOWNSHIP SERVICE GROUP 1 MEETING HELD ON 1 FEBRUARY 2011 87 The Chair indicated that the notes of the Pennines Service Groups had been included for the information of Members due to the small attendance at the meetings. DECIDED – That the notes of the Pennines Township Service Group 1 meeting be noted. NOTES FROM THE PENNINES TOWNSHIP SERVICE GROUP 2 MEETING HELD ON 15 FEBRUARY 2011 88 The Township Committee considered the notes of the meeting of the Pennines Township Service Group 2 held on 15 th February 2011. A Member informed the Township Committee the notes relating to the any other business heading were an incorrect statement and did not accurately reflect her comments at the meeting. Concerns exist around the Council and partners support provided to Ellen Road Trust, and not with the Trustees. DECIDED – That the notes of the Pennines Township Service Group 2 meeting be noted. NOTES FROM THE PENNINES TOWNSHIP SERVICE GROUP 3 MEETING HELD ON 8 FEBRUARY 2011 89 DECIDED – That the notes of the Pennines Township Service Group 3 meeting be noted. SCHOOL GOVERNING BODY VACANCIES 90 The Township Committee considered a report of the Service Director for Schools (PT. 11/11) that outlined the current Local Authority School Governor vacancies and requested that the Township Committee makes the appropriate Eligible appointments. The recommendations were presented as the Township Committee for call- in No Page 2 acts in accordance with the agreed procedures in appointing Local Authority representatives to serve on School Governing Bodies. Alternatives considered: There were no alternative methods of filling Local Authority Governor vacancies. DECIDED – That the appointment of an Authority School Governor for Milnrow Parish CE Primary School be deferred to the next meeting of the Township Committee. FUNDING FOR ADDITIONAL PENNINES TOWNSHIP SCHEMES 91 The Township Manager submitted a report (PT.12/11) updating Members on available Township Funds, resulting from cost savings of Highways schemes Eligible approved before 2010 and minor project under spends. Members were requested to for call- consider a list of submitted schemes and either approve or reject individual schemes in for funding from the £40,130 balance of Pennines Township Funds, including under- spends against completed highways schemes. Yes The purpose of the report was to allocate the Township budget for 2010 – 2011 and to ensure agreed works comply with priorities within Pennines Township. Alternatives and risks considered: Members were requested to consider the projects to ensure value for money and efficient use of Township funds. DECIDED – That the following schemes be approved- I. Waiting restrictions at Shore Hill/Halifax Road Junction £3,500; II. Traffic Parking restrictions at Ashbrook Hey Lane £3,500; III. £33,130 and any further savings funds are committed towards the cost of Footway reconstruction at Lightburn Avenue. GREATER MANCHESTER JOINT MINERALS PLAN 92 The Service Director for Planning and Regulation Service introduced a report (PT.13/11) consulting Members on the Greater Manchester Joint Minerals Plan. The Eligible Minerals Plan details land use issues
Recommended publications
  • Smithy Bridge Road, Littleborough, OL15 8QF Offers Over: £200,000
    Smithy Bridge Road, Littleborough, OL15 8QF SUBSTANTIAL STONE BUILT END TERRACED | THREE BEDROOMS | LARGE GARAGE WHICH CAN HOUSE CARAVAN / MOBILE HOME | ADDITIONAL PRIVATE PARKING FOR SIX CARS LARGE REAR GARDEN | IDEALLY LOCATED FOR STATION AND LOCAL SCHOOLS | NO ONWARD CHAIN | EPC RATING C Offers Over: £200,000 Smithy Bridge Road, Littleborough, OL15 DINING AREA 8QF 4.08m (13' 5") x 3.58m (11' 9") This substantial, stone built end terraced property, which was originally two separate houses, provides spacious three bedroomed family accommodation, and enjoys a popular residential location close to local schools and Smithy Bridge railway station, with Hollingworth Lake Country Park just half a mile away. Features include the size of the reception rooms, the large double garage / workshop with it’s additional private parking, and the superb rear garden. Offered to the market with no onward chain, this property, in addition to being an ideal family home, would suit those looking to accommodate a caravan or mobile home within the garage or boundary of the property. LOUNGE KITCHEN AREA 4.63m (15' 2") x 6.63m (21' 9") 4.48m (14' 8") x 2.55m (8' 4") the spacious lounge, which has an entrance vestibule, has two windows and could be separated into two rooms if preferred. There is a wall mounted electric heater, and trapdoor access to a cellar. LANDING with storage cupboard. BEDROOM 1 4.63m (15' 2") x 4.08m (13' 5") DINING KITCHEN large double bedroom with dual aspect windows, large open plan dining kitchen, with the kitchen and fitted wardrobes. comprising of a range of fitted base and wall units incorporating a range style oven with five ring hob, integrated washing machine, stainless steel sink unit, tiled floor and complementary wall tiling, and a wall mounted gas fired central heating boiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Are Several Current Development Strategies in Place Across Littleborough and Smithybridge, Which Should Be Noted
    Littleborough Civic Trust Website - www.littleboroughcivictrust.co.uk Email - [email protected] www.facebook.com/littleborough.civictrust.33 Twitter - Littleborough Civic Trust@LittleboroughC5 Littleborough Civic Trust statement on planning matters The Littleborough Civic Trust, keeping the interests of local residents at heart, have drafted the following article. We hope to raise awareness of ongoing and upcoming plans for the villages we live in and how the LCT intends to fight alongside residents for a say over the direction of local developments. To begin it is worth mentioning the local greenbelt group “Smithy Bridge & Littleborough: Save the Greenbelt” have made significant leaps in raising awareness and engagement with residents and have noted significant appetite to fight the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Plan. So, we hope this article is met with similar support. It is also worth note this article takes information from numerous sources to provide you with the most up-to-date and accurate statistics available, which will be cited if you so wish to read further. The intention is not to scaremonger and if that is the resultant effect we apologise in advance; however, this is the unfortunate scenario our village currently faces. There are several current development strategies in place across Littleborough and Smithybridge, which should be noted. For quick reference we have attached the number of homes suggested by each development plan: Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 Executive summary Proposed major and minor developments 544+ Rochdale Rail Corridor Strategy 1845 The Greater Manchester Spatial Framework 510 When looking at ongoing/proposed development plans of the local area we first need to understand the local infrastructure challenges we are faced with.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30Th September 2016
    Economy Directorate Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Number One Riverside, Smith Street Rochdale, OL16 1XU EMAIL: [email protected] Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30th September 2016 Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01180/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 29 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00009/AM LOCATION: St Cuthberts Rc Business And Enterprise College Shaw Road Rochdale OL16 4RX APPLICANT: AGENT: Mr Michael Flinders frankshaw associates Penmore House Hasland Road Hasland Chesterfield Derbyshire S41 05J Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ 16/01150/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 22 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00325/FUL LOCATION: 16 The Strand Rochdale OL11 2JG APPLICANT: AGENT: Miss Maddi Mooney Triangle Architects Emma Carlin Great Places Housing Group Raven House 729 Princess Road 113 Fairfield Street Manchester Manchester M20 2LT M12 6EL United Kingdom Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01079/HOUS Balderstone
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2020 to July 2021
    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2020 to July 2021 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. - 1 - 11/09/20 The IGO Pass All students between the ages of 11 and 16 need an IGO pass if they wish to travel at the concessionary (reduced fare) rate on buses. The IGO pass is like an ID card and proves that the student is aged 16 or under. It must be carried on all journeys and shown to the driver before paying the fare. The IGO pass costs £10 and can only be bought by students who live, or go to school in Greater Manchester. More information on IGO and an application form to get an IGO pass is on the TfGM website at http://igo.tfgm.com (Please note: students who are entitled to a free Scholars Travel Pass for journeys between home and school and students aged between 16 and 19 who have a Scholars Concessionary Pass, do not need an IGO Pass for these journeys) - 2 - 11/09/20 TFGM SCHOOL BUS OPERATORS IN ROCHDALE: Services in this leaflet are arranged by TFGM Service Planning Department. BPT Burnley and Pendle, Queensgate Bus Depot, Tel: 0345 60 40 110 Colne Road, Burnley BB10 1HH FM First Manchester, Wallshaw Street, Oldham Tel: 0161 627 2929 OL1 3TR DIA Diamond Bus, Unit 22/23 Chanters Tel: 01942 888893 Industrial Estate, Atherton, Manchester M46 9BP GNW Go North West, Boyle Street, Cheetham, Tel: 0330 1234 121 Manchester M8 8UT RDT Rosso, Queensgate Bus Depot, Colne Road, Tel: 0345 60 40 110 Burnley BB10 1HH SM Stagecoach Manchester, Hyde Road,
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Number 6 - January 2020
    ROCHDALE FOOD BANK Affilliated to the Trusell Trust ( Charity Number 1172470 ) Newsletter Number 6 - January 2020 A brief word from the Editor. Welcome to our sixth Newsletter, which henceforth is to appear three times a year. It is hard to believe that it’s already twelve months since we were struggling with massive repairs to our main premises at South Parade and even harder to believe that just a few months ago our shelves were close to empty and we were having to use financial donations to buy in sufficient food supplies to meet the ever- increasing needs of our clients! What a difference a few months make. We are of course used to the bulk of our donations coming during the Autumn Harvest celebrations and the lead-up to Christmas, but in the latter stages of 2019 we witnessed an extraordinary degree of generosity from the people of Rochdale. I’ve dedicated this Newsletter to highlighting some of those individuals and organisations who have helped us so much but it’s worth setting out some overall figures. In October we received 8803 kilogrammes of food, in November 6601 kilos and in December a massive 16471 kilos. This latter figure compares with the 10459 kilos donated to us in December 2018, an increase of around 60 per cent. I’m not sure what the reasons for this huge increase are, but it may be that the publicity our Foodbank has received during the past year via the Rochdale Observer and Rochdale Online has certainly helped, as has the high-profile work of the Trussell Trust in highlighting food poverty across England.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Pennines Township Committee, 10
    Public Document Pack Resources Directorate David Wilcock Assistant Director (Legal, Governance & Workforce) Governance & Committee Services Floor 2, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU Phone: 01706 647474 Website: www.rochdale.gov.uk To: All Members of the Pennines Township Enquiries to: Shahada Shahid Committee Email: [email protected] Telephone: 01706 924713 Date: 21st December 2016 Dear Councillor Pennines Township Committee You are requested to attend the meeting of the Pennines Township Committee to be held in Hollingworth B, Training and Conference Suite, First Floor, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU on Tuesday, 10th January 2017 commencing at 6.15 pm. The agenda and supporting papers are attached. If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please refer to the Code of Conduct or contact the Monitoring Officer or staff in the Governance and Committee Services Team at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Yours Faithfully David Wilcock Assistant Director (Legal, Governance & Workforce) Pennines Township Committee Membership 2016/17 Councillor John Blundell (Chair) Councillor Neil Butterworth Councillor Robert Clegg Councillor Ashley Dearnley Councillor Janet Emsley Councillor Irene Davidson Councillor John Hartley Councillor Aftab Hussain Councillor Andy Kelly Councillor Amna Mir Councillor Rina Paolucci-Escobar (Vice Chair) Councillor Ann Stott JP Rochdale Borough Council PENNINES TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE Tuesday, 10th January 2017 at 6.15 pm Hollingworth B, Training and Conference Suite, First Floor, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 322 LOCAL GOVERNirfKHT BOUNDARY COAIMISSIOH FOR ENGLA1ID REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KGB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison PH To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF ROCHDALE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the metropolitan borough of Rochdale in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Rochdale Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies. 3. Rochdale Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of a Community Rail Partnership for the Calder Valley Line
    Report to Cabinet Date of Meeting 30th March 2021 Portfolio A Thriving Economy Report Author Dawn Sexton Public Document The Formation of a Community Rail Partnership for the Calder Valley Line Executive Summary 1.1 Members of the Cabinet are asked to approve the formation of a Community Rail Partnership (CRP) for the Calder Valley Line, which would include all five of the borough’s railway stations along with seven railway stations in Calderdale. 1.2 CRP’s bring together local groups and partners along railway lines to work with the rail industry, and deliver a range of community engagement and promotional activities to encourage ownership and improve access to and use of local rail services. CRPs promote understanding of the importance of local railways, in terms of improving mobility and sustainable travel, community cohesion and wellbeing and social and economic development. 1.3 Officers from Rochdale and Calderdale Councils, in conjunction with Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) and the West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA), have been working together on a proposal to establish a CRP with Rochdale Borough Council acting as the accountable body for the partnership in the first instance. 1.4 Forming a CRP would involve creating a Community Rail Officer post (part- time) to support the partnership, to develop a business plan and deliver activity to promote use of the Calder Valley Line. The work will increase community engagement and complement the Council’s Rail Corridor Strategy which promotes the physical regeneration of land and buildings around the Borough’s rail stations. Recommendation 2.1 Cabinet approves the formation of a CRP for the Calder Valley Line, in collaboration with Calderdale Council.
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2018 to July 2019
    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2018 to July 2019 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Although provided primarily for school students, members of the public may use these services with the exception of Yellow School Buses. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. Rochdale Schools 2018-2019 - 1 - 07/01/19 An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.30. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares.
    [Show full text]
  • Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation
    Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation July 2021 Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 2. Comparison of policy prefixes names and numbers between GMSF 2020 and PfE 2021 ............................................................................................................................. 8 PART A – Summary of Consultations .............................................................................. 14 2.1. Statement of Community Involvement Compliance .................................................... 14 2.2. Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Scoping survey 2014 ................................... 14 2.3. Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Vision, Objectives and Options, Winter 2015/16 ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.4. Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, Winter 2016/2017 ............................... 21 2.5. The Plan for Jobs, Homes and the Environment (GMSF) January to March 2019 ...... 26 PART B - The Plan for Jobs, Homes and Environment (Revised Draft GMSF) (2019) Consultation Report ................................................................................................. 29 3.1. Thematic Policies ....................................................................................................... 32 3.1.1. Context of GMSF ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street
    Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 Houses Electors Street Details As First Added to Deleted Current As First Added to Deleted Applicants Current Published Register Published Register Pending DA - ANNE LINE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 16 DEANCOURT 41 0 0 41 99 0 1 (1.01%) 0 98 (-1.01%) DENHOLME ROAD 21 0 0 21 35 0 0 0 35 DENVER ROAD 23 0 0 23 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%) DICKEN GREEN LANE 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 STONEYVALE COURT, DICKEN 73 0 0 73 102 1 (0.98%) 0 0 103 (0.98%) GREEN LANE DICKEN GREEN 24 0 0 24 35 0 2 (5.71%) 0 33 (-5.71%) DIGBY ROAD 34 0 0 34 70 0 0 0 70 DUNLOP AVENUE 34 0 0 34 59 0 0 0 59 EDINBURGH WAY 10 0 0 10 14 0 2 (14.29%) 0 12 (-14.29%) GREEN BRIDGE CLOSE 30 0 0 30 44 1 (2.27%) 0 0 45 (2.27%) HARTLEY LANE 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 HURST STREET 13 0 0 13 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) LABURNUM TERRACE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 LOWTHER ROAD 42 0 0 42 69 2 (2.90%) 1 (1.45%) 0 70 (1.45%) MARGARET WARD COURT 30 0 0 30 32 0 0 0 32 OLDHAM ROAD 17 0 0 17 24 0 0 0 24 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 IAN FRASER COURT, QUEENSWAY 38 0 0 38 43 0 1 (2.33%) 0 42 (-2.33%) QUEENSWAY 59 0 0 59 120 0 0 0 120 SCHOFIELD STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 WELL I'TH' LANE 37 0 0 37 65 3 (4.62%) 6 (9.23%) 0 62 (-4.62%) WELL STREET 28 0 0 28 48 0 0 0 48 WELLFIELD MEWS 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 WELLFIELD PLACE 11 0 0 11 27 0 2 (7.41%) 0 25 (-7.41%) WELLFIELD STREET 15 0 0 15 19 1 (5.26%) 2 (10.53%) 1 18 (-5.26%) WILLIAM HENRY STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 Totals for : DA - 636 0 0 636 1,063 8 (0.75%) 19 (1.79%) 1 1,052 (-1.03%) DB
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Allocations Plan September 2018
    Draft Allocations Plan September 2018 Draft Allocations Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Vision and Spatial Strategy ............................................................................................................. 4 3. Policy Context ................................................................................................................................. 5 4. Proposals Map ................................................................................................................................ 6 5. Delivering a more prosperous economy .......................................................................................... 7 6. Creating successful and healthy communities .............................................................................. 13 7. Promoting a greener environment ................................................................................................. 19 8. Improving accessibility and delivering sustainable transport ......................................................... 25 9. Monitoring and Delivery ................................................................................................................ 34 rochdale.gov.uk 2 Draft Allocations Plan 1. Introduction All local planning authorities are required to prepare a local plan that provides a vision and a framework for the future planning of their area, addressing needs and
    [Show full text]