Primary School Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Primary School Results Aggregate of percentage of Percentage of pupils achieving pupils achieving level 4 or level 4 or better Value School better in the 3 core subjects Added English Maths Science 2006 2007 2008 Measure St Patrick's Roman Catholic Primary School 100% 100% 97% 281 278 297 101.4 Newhey Community Primary School 100% 95% 100% 273 279 295 101.7 Hopwood Community Primary School, Heywood 100% 98% 98% 266 287 295 99.9 Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School, Littleborough 94% 100% 100% 254 265 294 100.1 Shawclough Community Primary School 96% 96% 100% 275 258 293 101.7 Whittaker Moss Primary School 97% 97% 97% 294 289 291 100 Bamford Primary School 98% 90% 100% 277 285 288 99.9 Smithy Bridge Foundation Primary School 95% 93% 98% 265 273 286 100.6 St Peter's Roman Catholic Primary School 93% 93% 97% 300 277 283 101.2 All Souls Church of England Primary School, Heywood 90% 93% 100% 265 279 283 99.7 St John Fisher Roman Catholic Primary School 96% 89% 96% 250 280 282 100.5 St Michael's Church of England Primary School, Bamford 94% 94% 94% 300 300 281 100.9 Crossgates Primary School 94% 92% 94% 281 271 281 99.5 St Michael's Church of England Primary School, Alkrington 97% 86% 97% 282 285 280 99.6 Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School 95% 92% 92% 283 255 279 100.6 St Mary's Roman Catholic Primary School, Littleborough 93% 85% 100% 300 279 278 99.7 St Vincent's Roman Catholic Primary School 92% 90% 95% 276 274 277 100.2 St Joseph's Roman Catholic Primary School, Heywood 98% 84% 93% 261 249 276 100.5 Caldershaw Primary School 91% 88% 97% 266 258 275 100.8 Healey Foundation Primary School 94% 87% 94% 248 247 274 100.3 St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, Middleton 94% 84% 96% 288 274 274 100.3 Holy Family Roman Catholic Primary School 85% 92% 96% 248 271 273 101.8 Lowerplace Primary School 87% 90% 96% 238 272 273 101.8 Meanwood Community Nursery and Primary School 83% 90% 97% 251 256 270 0 St Thomas' Church of England Primary School 84% 84% 100% 300 268 268 101.5 Our Lady and St Paul's Roman Catholic Primary School, Heywood 84% 92% 92% 258 276 268 101 Littleborough Community Primary School 80% 95% 93% 275 277 268 100.3 Middleton Parish CofE Primary School 75% 88% 100% 242 237 263 100.4 Moorhouse Primary School 87% 74% 100% 202 205 261 100 St Andrew's Church of England Primary School, Dearnley 77% 89% 94% 270 272 260 100.2 St Gabriel's Church of England Primary School 76% 84% 100% 204 265 260 99.7 St James' Church of England Primary School 91% 78% 91% 229 282 259 99.1 Hamer Community Primary School 83% 77% 96% 202 224 255 101.7 Milnrow Parish Church of England Primary School 79% 88% 88% 240 255 255 99.9 Greenbank Primary School 83% 80% 90% 218 239 253 100.7 Aggregate of percentage of Percentage of pupils achieving pupils achieving level 4 or level 4 or better Value School better in the 3 core subjects Added English Maths Science 2006 2007 2008 Measure St Mary's Roman Catholic Primary School, Middleton 83% 80% 90% 218 218 253 100.4 St Gabriel's Roman Catholic Primary School 80% 76% 96% 281 242 252 98.4 Rochdale average 81% 79% 89% 242 242 249 100.2 Harwood Park Primary School, Heywood 80% 80% 89% 245 253 248 99.8 National average 81% 79% 88% 242 245 248 0 Boarshaw Community Primary School 75% 75% 96% 209 200 246 101.5 Norden Community Primary School 85% 78% 83% 264 248 246 99.2 Castleton Primary School 81% 76% 86% 235 205 243 99.2 All Saints Church of England Primary School 82% 73% 88% 206 203 242 100.8 Ashfield Valley Primary School 79% 75% 86% 229 243 239 101.1 Elm Wood Primary School 77% 71% 91% 240 230 239 98.4 Belfield Community School 76% 72% 88% 260 209 236 102 Spotland Primary School 80% 70% 86% 229 196 236 101.1 Alkrington Primary School 76% 71% 89% 246 246 236 99.5 Deeplish Community Primary School 80% 73% 84% 233 185 236 99.2 St Mary's Church of England Primary School, Balderstone 67% 67% 100% 273 254 233 100.1 St Margaret's Church of England Primary School, Heywood 83% 73% 77% 247 167 233 99.4 Parkfield Primary School 83% 67% 83% 269 241 233 98.4 Heybrook Primary School 71% 77% 81% 189 217 228 99.4 Marland Hill Community Primary School 59% 76% 90% 210 233 224 100.7 Little Heaton Church of England Primary School 74% 65% 83% 260 266 222 101.1 St Peter's Church of England Primary School 63% 76% 83% 213 207 222 99.5 Stansfield Hall Church of England/Free Church Primary School, Littleboroug 80% 65% 75% 243 184 220 98.5 St John's Roman Catholic Primary School 57% 71% 81% 135 212 210 100 St Edward's Church of England Primary School 67% 58% 85% 231 282 210 99 Kentmere Primary School 72% 65% 72% 233 187 209 100.7 Alice Ingham Roman Catholic Primary School 76% 64% 70% 282 261 209 99.9 Brimrod Community Primary School 56% 76% 76% 221 200 208 100 Woodland Community Primary School, Heywood 69% 66% 72% 0 193 207 98.9 Sandbrook Community Primary School 57% 51% 77% 207 196 185 100.2 Hollin Primary School 67% 43% 73% 176 212 183 98.7 Broadfield Community Primary School 54% 41% 52% 204 205 148 97.
Recommended publications
  • Smithy Bridge Road, Littleborough, OL15 8QF Offers Over: £200,000
    Smithy Bridge Road, Littleborough, OL15 8QF SUBSTANTIAL STONE BUILT END TERRACED | THREE BEDROOMS | LARGE GARAGE WHICH CAN HOUSE CARAVAN / MOBILE HOME | ADDITIONAL PRIVATE PARKING FOR SIX CARS LARGE REAR GARDEN | IDEALLY LOCATED FOR STATION AND LOCAL SCHOOLS | NO ONWARD CHAIN | EPC RATING C Offers Over: £200,000 Smithy Bridge Road, Littleborough, OL15 DINING AREA 8QF 4.08m (13' 5") x 3.58m (11' 9") This substantial, stone built end terraced property, which was originally two separate houses, provides spacious three bedroomed family accommodation, and enjoys a popular residential location close to local schools and Smithy Bridge railway station, with Hollingworth Lake Country Park just half a mile away. Features include the size of the reception rooms, the large double garage / workshop with it’s additional private parking, and the superb rear garden. Offered to the market with no onward chain, this property, in addition to being an ideal family home, would suit those looking to accommodate a caravan or mobile home within the garage or boundary of the property. LOUNGE KITCHEN AREA 4.63m (15' 2") x 6.63m (21' 9") 4.48m (14' 8") x 2.55m (8' 4") the spacious lounge, which has an entrance vestibule, has two windows and could be separated into two rooms if preferred. There is a wall mounted electric heater, and trapdoor access to a cellar. LANDING with storage cupboard. BEDROOM 1 4.63m (15' 2") x 4.08m (13' 5") DINING KITCHEN large double bedroom with dual aspect windows, large open plan dining kitchen, with the kitchen and fitted wardrobes. comprising of a range of fitted base and wall units incorporating a range style oven with five ring hob, integrated washing machine, stainless steel sink unit, tiled floor and complementary wall tiling, and a wall mounted gas fired central heating boiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Frontsheet 24/05/2011, 18.15
    Public Document Pack LEGAL & DEMOCRATIC SERVICES Linda Fisher Service Director COMMITTEE SERVICES SECTION PO Box 15, Town Hall, Rochdale OL16 1AB Telephone: Rochdale (01706) 647474 Fax: Rochdale (01706) 924705 www.rochdale.gov.uk To: All Members of Pennines Your Ref: Township Committee Our Ref: Enquiries to: Michael Garraway Extension: 4716 Date: 11 th May 2011 Dear Councillor PENNINES TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE You are requested to attend the meeting of Pennines Township Committee to be held in St. James Primary School, Crossfield Road, Wardle, Rochdale, OL12 9JW on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 commencing at 6.15 pm. The agenda and supporting papers are attached. If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please contact staff in the Committee Services Section at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Yours faithfully Linda Fisher Service Director Pennines Township Committee Membership 2011/12 Councillor Jean Ashworth Councillor Martin Burke Councillor Robert Clegg Councillor Janet Darnbrough Councillor Irene Davidson Councillor Ashley Dearnley Councillor Peter Ernest Evans Councillor Aftab Hussain Councillor Andy Kelly Councillor Stephanie Mills Councillor Martin Eric Rodgers Councillor Ann Stott 1 ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL PENNINES TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE Tuesday, 24 May 2011 at 6.15 pm St. James Primary School, Crossfield Road, Wardle, Rochdale, OL12 9JW A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 1. Appointment of Chair 2011/12 2. Appointment of Vice - Chair 2011/12 3. Apologies for Absence 4. Declarations of Interest 5. OPEN FORUM (6.15 p.m. - 6.45 p.m.) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Are Several Current Development Strategies in Place Across Littleborough and Smithybridge, Which Should Be Noted
    Littleborough Civic Trust Website - www.littleboroughcivictrust.co.uk Email - [email protected] www.facebook.com/littleborough.civictrust.33 Twitter - Littleborough Civic Trust@LittleboroughC5 Littleborough Civic Trust statement on planning matters The Littleborough Civic Trust, keeping the interests of local residents at heart, have drafted the following article. We hope to raise awareness of ongoing and upcoming plans for the villages we live in and how the LCT intends to fight alongside residents for a say over the direction of local developments. To begin it is worth mentioning the local greenbelt group “Smithy Bridge & Littleborough: Save the Greenbelt” have made significant leaps in raising awareness and engagement with residents and have noted significant appetite to fight the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Plan. So, we hope this article is met with similar support. It is also worth note this article takes information from numerous sources to provide you with the most up-to-date and accurate statistics available, which will be cited if you so wish to read further. The intention is not to scaremonger and if that is the resultant effect we apologise in advance; however, this is the unfortunate scenario our village currently faces. There are several current development strategies in place across Littleborough and Smithybridge, which should be noted. For quick reference we have attached the number of homes suggested by each development plan: Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 Executive summary Proposed major and minor developments 544+ Rochdale Rail Corridor Strategy 1845 The Greater Manchester Spatial Framework 510 When looking at ongoing/proposed development plans of the local area we first need to understand the local infrastructure challenges we are faced with.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30Th September 2016
    Economy Directorate Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Number One Riverside, Smith Street Rochdale, OL16 1XU EMAIL: [email protected] Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30th September 2016 Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01180/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 29 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00009/AM LOCATION: St Cuthberts Rc Business And Enterprise College Shaw Road Rochdale OL16 4RX APPLICANT: AGENT: Mr Michael Flinders frankshaw associates Penmore House Hasland Road Hasland Chesterfield Derbyshire S41 05J Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ 16/01150/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 22 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00325/FUL LOCATION: 16 The Strand Rochdale OL11 2JG APPLICANT: AGENT: Miss Maddi Mooney Triangle Architects Emma Carlin Great Places Housing Group Raven House 729 Princess Road 113 Fairfield Street Manchester Manchester M20 2LT M12 6EL United Kingdom Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01079/HOUS Balderstone
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2020 to July 2021
    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2020 to July 2021 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. - 1 - 11/09/20 The IGO Pass All students between the ages of 11 and 16 need an IGO pass if they wish to travel at the concessionary (reduced fare) rate on buses. The IGO pass is like an ID card and proves that the student is aged 16 or under. It must be carried on all journeys and shown to the driver before paying the fare. The IGO pass costs £10 and can only be bought by students who live, or go to school in Greater Manchester. More information on IGO and an application form to get an IGO pass is on the TfGM website at http://igo.tfgm.com (Please note: students who are entitled to a free Scholars Travel Pass for journeys between home and school and students aged between 16 and 19 who have a Scholars Concessionary Pass, do not need an IGO Pass for these journeys) - 2 - 11/09/20 TFGM SCHOOL BUS OPERATORS IN ROCHDALE: Services in this leaflet are arranged by TFGM Service Planning Department. BPT Burnley and Pendle, Queensgate Bus Depot, Tel: 0345 60 40 110 Colne Road, Burnley BB10 1HH FM First Manchester, Wallshaw Street, Oldham Tel: 0161 627 2929 OL1 3TR DIA Diamond Bus, Unit 22/23 Chanters Tel: 01942 888893 Industrial Estate, Atherton, Manchester M46 9BP GNW Go North West, Boyle Street, Cheetham, Tel: 0330 1234 121 Manchester M8 8UT RDT Rosso, Queensgate Bus Depot, Colne Road, Tel: 0345 60 40 110 Burnley BB10 1HH SM Stagecoach Manchester, Hyde Road,
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Number 6 - January 2020
    ROCHDALE FOOD BANK Affilliated to the Trusell Trust ( Charity Number 1172470 ) Newsletter Number 6 - January 2020 A brief word from the Editor. Welcome to our sixth Newsletter, which henceforth is to appear three times a year. It is hard to believe that it’s already twelve months since we were struggling with massive repairs to our main premises at South Parade and even harder to believe that just a few months ago our shelves were close to empty and we were having to use financial donations to buy in sufficient food supplies to meet the ever- increasing needs of our clients! What a difference a few months make. We are of course used to the bulk of our donations coming during the Autumn Harvest celebrations and the lead-up to Christmas, but in the latter stages of 2019 we witnessed an extraordinary degree of generosity from the people of Rochdale. I’ve dedicated this Newsletter to highlighting some of those individuals and organisations who have helped us so much but it’s worth setting out some overall figures. In October we received 8803 kilogrammes of food, in November 6601 kilos and in December a massive 16471 kilos. This latter figure compares with the 10459 kilos donated to us in December 2018, an increase of around 60 per cent. I’m not sure what the reasons for this huge increase are, but it may be that the publicity our Foodbank has received during the past year via the Rochdale Observer and Rochdale Online has certainly helped, as has the high-profile work of the Trussell Trust in highlighting food poverty across England.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Pennines Township Committee, 10
    Public Document Pack Resources Directorate David Wilcock Assistant Director (Legal, Governance & Workforce) Governance & Committee Services Floor 2, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU Phone: 01706 647474 Website: www.rochdale.gov.uk To: All Members of the Pennines Township Enquiries to: Shahada Shahid Committee Email: [email protected] Telephone: 01706 924713 Date: 21st December 2016 Dear Councillor Pennines Township Committee You are requested to attend the meeting of the Pennines Township Committee to be held in Hollingworth B, Training and Conference Suite, First Floor, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU on Tuesday, 10th January 2017 commencing at 6.15 pm. The agenda and supporting papers are attached. If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please refer to the Code of Conduct or contact the Monitoring Officer or staff in the Governance and Committee Services Team at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Yours Faithfully David Wilcock Assistant Director (Legal, Governance & Workforce) Pennines Township Committee Membership 2016/17 Councillor John Blundell (Chair) Councillor Neil Butterworth Councillor Robert Clegg Councillor Ashley Dearnley Councillor Janet Emsley Councillor Irene Davidson Councillor John Hartley Councillor Aftab Hussain Councillor Andy Kelly Councillor Amna Mir Councillor Rina Paolucci-Escobar (Vice Chair) Councillor Ann Stott JP Rochdale Borough Council PENNINES TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE Tuesday, 10th January 2017 at 6.15 pm Hollingworth B, Training and Conference Suite, First Floor, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 322 LOCAL GOVERNirfKHT BOUNDARY COAIMISSIOH FOR ENGLA1ID REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KGB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison PH To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF ROCHDALE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the metropolitan borough of Rochdale in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Rochdale Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies. 3. Rochdale Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of a Community Rail Partnership for the Calder Valley Line
    Report to Cabinet Date of Meeting 30th March 2021 Portfolio A Thriving Economy Report Author Dawn Sexton Public Document The Formation of a Community Rail Partnership for the Calder Valley Line Executive Summary 1.1 Members of the Cabinet are asked to approve the formation of a Community Rail Partnership (CRP) for the Calder Valley Line, which would include all five of the borough’s railway stations along with seven railway stations in Calderdale. 1.2 CRP’s bring together local groups and partners along railway lines to work with the rail industry, and deliver a range of community engagement and promotional activities to encourage ownership and improve access to and use of local rail services. CRPs promote understanding of the importance of local railways, in terms of improving mobility and sustainable travel, community cohesion and wellbeing and social and economic development. 1.3 Officers from Rochdale and Calderdale Councils, in conjunction with Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) and the West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA), have been working together on a proposal to establish a CRP with Rochdale Borough Council acting as the accountable body for the partnership in the first instance. 1.4 Forming a CRP would involve creating a Community Rail Officer post (part- time) to support the partnership, to develop a business plan and deliver activity to promote use of the Calder Valley Line. The work will increase community engagement and complement the Council’s Rail Corridor Strategy which promotes the physical regeneration of land and buildings around the Borough’s rail stations. Recommendation 2.1 Cabinet approves the formation of a CRP for the Calder Valley Line, in collaboration with Calderdale Council.
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2018 to July 2019
    School Bus Services in Rochdale September 2018 to July 2019 Services in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Although provided primarily for school students, members of the public may use these services with the exception of Yellow School Buses. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. Rochdale Schools 2018-2019 - 1 - 07/01/19 An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.30. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares.
    [Show full text]
  • Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation
    Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation July 2021 Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 2. Comparison of policy prefixes names and numbers between GMSF 2020 and PfE 2021 ............................................................................................................................. 8 PART A – Summary of Consultations .............................................................................. 14 2.1. Statement of Community Involvement Compliance .................................................... 14 2.2. Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Scoping survey 2014 ................................... 14 2.3. Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Vision, Objectives and Options, Winter 2015/16 ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.4. Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, Winter 2016/2017 ............................... 21 2.5. The Plan for Jobs, Homes and the Environment (GMSF) January to March 2019 ...... 26 PART B - The Plan for Jobs, Homes and Environment (Revised Draft GMSF) (2019) Consultation Report ................................................................................................. 29 3.1. Thematic Policies ....................................................................................................... 32 3.1.1. Context of GMSF ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street
    Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 Houses Electors Street Details As First Added to Deleted Current As First Added to Deleted Applicants Current Published Register Published Register Pending DA - ANNE LINE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 16 DEANCOURT 41 0 0 41 99 0 1 (1.01%) 0 98 (-1.01%) DENHOLME ROAD 21 0 0 21 35 0 0 0 35 DENVER ROAD 23 0 0 23 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%) DICKEN GREEN LANE 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 STONEYVALE COURT, DICKEN 73 0 0 73 102 1 (0.98%) 0 0 103 (0.98%) GREEN LANE DICKEN GREEN 24 0 0 24 35 0 2 (5.71%) 0 33 (-5.71%) DIGBY ROAD 34 0 0 34 70 0 0 0 70 DUNLOP AVENUE 34 0 0 34 59 0 0 0 59 EDINBURGH WAY 10 0 0 10 14 0 2 (14.29%) 0 12 (-14.29%) GREEN BRIDGE CLOSE 30 0 0 30 44 1 (2.27%) 0 0 45 (2.27%) HARTLEY LANE 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 HURST STREET 13 0 0 13 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) LABURNUM TERRACE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 LOWTHER ROAD 42 0 0 42 69 2 (2.90%) 1 (1.45%) 0 70 (1.45%) MARGARET WARD COURT 30 0 0 30 32 0 0 0 32 OLDHAM ROAD 17 0 0 17 24 0 0 0 24 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 IAN FRASER COURT, QUEENSWAY 38 0 0 38 43 0 1 (2.33%) 0 42 (-2.33%) QUEENSWAY 59 0 0 59 120 0 0 0 120 SCHOFIELD STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 WELL I'TH' LANE 37 0 0 37 65 3 (4.62%) 6 (9.23%) 0 62 (-4.62%) WELL STREET 28 0 0 28 48 0 0 0 48 WELLFIELD MEWS 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 WELLFIELD PLACE 11 0 0 11 27 0 2 (7.41%) 0 25 (-7.41%) WELLFIELD STREET 15 0 0 15 19 1 (5.26%) 2 (10.53%) 1 18 (-5.26%) WILLIAM HENRY STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 Totals for : DA - 636 0 0 636 1,063 8 (0.75%) 19 (1.79%) 1 1,052 (-1.03%) DB
    [Show full text]