Profession-Led HLP Level 1 Register - East Midlands 23/11/2017
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rutland Main Map A0 Portrait
Rutland County Council Local Plan Pre-Submission Policies Map 480000 485000 490000 495000 500000 505000 Rutland County - Main map Thistleton Inset 53 Stretton (west) Clipsham Inset 51 Market Overton Inset 13 Inset 35 Teigh Inset 52 Stretton Inset 50 Barrow Greetham Inset 4 Inset 25 Cottesmore (north) 315000 Whissendine Inset 15 Inset 61 Greetham (east) Inset 26 Ashwell Cottesmore Inset 1 Inset 14 Pickworth Inset 40 Essendine Inset 20 Cottesmore (south) Inset 16 Ashwell (south) Langham Inset 2 Ryhall Exton Inset 30 Inset 45 Burley Inset 21 Inset 11 Oakham & Barleythorpe Belmesthorpe Inset 38 Little Casterton Inset 6 Rutland Water Inset 31 Inset 44 310000 Tickencote Great Inset 55 Casterton Oakham town centre & Toll Bar Inset 39 Empingham Inset 24 Whitwell Stamford North (Quarry Farm) Inset 19 Inset 62 Inset 48 Egleton Hambleton Ketton Inset 18 Inset 27 Inset 28 Braunston-in-Rutland Inset 9 Tinwell Inset 56 Brooke Inset 10 Edith Weston Inset 17 Ketton (central) Inset 29 305000 Manton Inset 34 Lyndon Inset 33 St. George's Garden Community Inset 64 North Luffenham Wing Inset 37 Inset 63 Pilton Ridlington Preston Inset 41 Inset 43 Inset 42 South Luffenham Inset 47 Belton-in-Rutland Inset 7 Ayston Inset 3 Morcott Wardley Uppingham Glaston Inset 36 Tixover Inset 60 Inset 58 Inset 23 Barrowden Inset 57 Inset 5 Uppingham town centre Inset 59 300000 Bisbrooke Inset 8 Seaton Inset 46 Eyebrook Reservoir Inset 22 Lyddington Inset 32 Stoke Dry Inset 49 Thorpe by Water Inset 54 Key to Policies on Main and Inset Maps Rutland County Boundary Adjoining -
BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT at RIDLINGTON, RUTLAND Matthew Beamish
01 Ridlington - Beamish 30/9/05 3:19 pm Page 1 BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT AT RIDLINGTON, RUTLAND Matthew Beamish with contributions from Lynden Cooper, Alan Hogg, Patrick Marsden, and Angela Monckton A post-ring roundhouse and adjacent structure were recorded by University of Leicester Archaeological Services, during archaeological recording preceding laying of the Wing to Whatborough Hill trunk main in 1996 by Anglian Water plc. The form of the roundhouse together with the radiocarbon dating of charred grains and finds of pottery and flint indicate that the remains stemmed from occupation toward the end of the second millennium B.C. The distribution of charred cereal remains within the postholes indicates that grain including barley was processed and stored on site. A pit containing a small quantity of Beaker style pottery was also recorded to the east, whilst a palaeolith was recovered from the infill of a cryogenic fissure. The remains were discovered on the northern edge of a flat plateau of Northamptonshire Sand Ironstone at between 176 and 177m ODSK832023). The plateau forms a widening of a west–east ridge, a natural route way, above northern slopes down into the Chater Valley, and abrupt escarpments above the parishes of Ayston and Belton to the south (illus. 2). Near to the site, springs issue from just below the 160m and 130m contours to the north and south east respectively and ponds exist to the east corresponding with a boulder clay cap. The area was targeted for investigation as it lay on the northern fringe of a substantial Mesolithic/Early Neolithic flint scatter (LE5661, 5662, 5663) (illus. -
It's Pantomime Season! Colourful Hands Cherish Me
The IRISMagazine Autumn 2019 IT’S PANTOMIME SEASON! COLOURFUL HANDS CHERISH ME For Parents Of Children And Young People With Special Educational Needs And Disabilities in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CONTENTS 2 Rumbletums 3 Autumn Recipes 3 Cherish Me 4 It’s Pantomime Season RUMBLETUMS Rumbletums, in Kimberley, is a community hub Colourful Hands with a café and supported training project. The 4 group began eight years ago as an idea between parents of children with learning disabilities and 5 Support and Advice additional needs. They noticed that there was a for the New School lack of opportunities for their children and others like them to develop the skills and experience Year needed to succeed in life and decided to do something about. YOUNG PEOPLE’S ZONE The café opened in 2011, with a fully voluntary staff base and has grown organically over time. Fundraising and 6 - 11 Events generous donations from local people and businesses has meant that the project has been able to grow organically and now employs a number of full-time staff, who work 12 Independent alongside the volunteers and trainees. Living: Travel and Transport The café provides an opportunity for 16-30 year olds with learning disabilities and additional needs, such as physical Nottingham disabilities, to work in a café environment. With a variety of roles to fill, trainees could be working in the kitchen or front of house, depending on their comfort levels, abilities 13 Beauty and preferences. Shifts last a maximum of three hours. Instagrammers with Disabilities Trainees benefit from a wide range of experiences and skills outside the café too. -
East Midlands
Liberal Democrat submission for BCE 3rd consultation East Midlands Submission to the Boundary Commission for England third period of consultation: East Midlands Summary There is a factual error in the Commission’s report concerning the Liberal Democrat counter-proposals in the Leicestershire / Northamptonshire / Nottinghamshire / Rutland sub-region. We would, therefore, ask the Commission to reconsider the scheme we put forward. We welcome the change the Commission has made to its proposal for Mansfield. We welcome the fact that the Commission has kept to its original proposals in Lincolnshire, much of Derbyshire and Derby, and in Northampton. We consider that the changes that the Commission has made to four constituencies in Derbyshire, affecting the disposition of three wards, are finely balanced judgement calls with which we are content to accept the Commission’s view. The change that the Commission has made to the Kettering and Wellingborough constituencies would not have needed to be considered if it had agreed to our proposal for an unchanged Wellingborough seat. The Commission’s proposal to move the Burton Joyce and Stoke Bardolph ward into its proposed Sherwood constituency means that it is now proposing three Nottinghamshire constituencies (Bassetlaw, Broxtowe, Sherwood) which contain a ward which is inaccessible from the rest of the seat. We are not in agreement with the Commission’s failure to comply with the spirit of the legislation or the letter of its own guidelines in respect of these three proposed constituencies. We are not in agreement with the Commission’s failure to respect the boundaries of the City of Nottingham to the extent of proposing three constituencies that cross the Unitary Authority boundary. -
88,886 Sq Ft 75,402 Sq Ft
UNDER CONSTRUCTION A610 | EASTWOOD | NOTTINGHAM | NG16 3UA TWO INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE UNITS • Self contained buildings fronting A610 88,886 sq ft • M1 junction 26 - 7 minutes • 50m yard depth TO LET AVAILABLE Q3 2018 • Potential for additional HGV or 75,402 sq ft car parking • 12m clear to underside of haunch TO LET AVAILABLE Q4 2018 PPNOTTINGHAM.COM INDICATIVE IMAGE TWO SUPERIOR LOGISTICS WAREHOUSES, IDEALLY LOCATED FOR REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION Panattoni Park Nottingham has direct access to the M1 motorway at junction 26, making it the ideal location serving markets in the Midlands and the North. Over 18 million people live within 2.5 hours HGV NOTTINGHAM89 - EXTERNAL VIEW drive of this strategically located scheme. Nottingham89 (88,866 sq ft) and Nottingham75 (75,402 sq ft) are prominently located fronting the A610. Both warehouses will be available for occupation by the end of 2018. NOTTINGHAM75 - EXTERNAL VIEW PPNOTTINGHAM.COM J26 M1 NOTTINGHAM550 ADDITIONAL LAND AVAILABLE EXTRA CAR PARKING/ HGV PARKING/VMU A610 NOTTINGHAM75 NOTTINGHAM89 Panattoni Park Nottingham is well placed, with direct access to the M1 motorway at junction 26 and the surrounding area, offering excellent access to an experienced workforce. A99 A9 Stornoway A9 A9 A835 A98 A96 A90 A96 A952 Portree Inverness A95 A9 A87 A82 A90 A96 ABERDEEN A87 A9 A86 A830 A90 Fort William A92 A90 A82 A9 DUNDEE A92 A85 Perth A90 A85 St Andrews A82 A84 M90 A9 ABERDEEN A92 A91 Stirling Dunfermline M9 Falkirk EDINBURGH A1 GLASGOW DUNDEE M8 Paisley A68 A71 Berwick-upon-Tweed A737 M90 A78 M77 -
Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004
Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 418 HOUSING, ENGLAND The Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 Made - - - - 20th February 2004 Laid before Parliament 25th February 2004 Coming into force - - 17th March 2004 The First Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sections 157(1)(c) and 3(a) of the Housing Act 1985(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 17th March 2004. (2) In this Order “the Act” means the Housing Act 1985. Designated rural areas 2. The areas specified in the Schedule are designated as rural areas for the purposes of section 157 of the Act. Designated regions 3.—(1) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 1 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Forest of Dean. (2) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 2 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Rochford. (1) 1985 c. -
Royal Forest Trail
Once there was a large forest on the borders of Rutland called the Royal Forest of Leighfield. Now only traces remain, like Prior’s Coppice, near Leighfield Lodge. The plentiful hedgerows and small fields in the area also give hints about the past vegetation cover. Villages, like Belton and Braunston, once deeply situated in the forest, are square shaped. This is considered to be due to their origin as enclosures within the forest where the first houses surrounded an open space into which animals could be driven for their protection and greater security - rather like the covered wagon circle in the American West. This eventually produced a ‘hollow-centred’ village later filled in by buildings. In Braunston the process of filling in the centre had been going on for many centuries. Ridlington betrays its forest proximity by its ‘dead-end’ road, continued only by farm tracks today. The forest blocked entry in this direction. Indeed, if you look at the 2 ½ inch O.S map you will notice that there are no through roads between Belton and Braunston due to the forest acting as a physical administrative barrier. To find out more about this area, follow this trail… You can start in Oakham, going west out of town on the Cold Overton Road, then 2nd left onto West Road towards Braunston. Going up the hill to Braunston. In Braunston, walk around to see the old buildings such as Cheseldyn Farm and Quaintree Hall; go down to the charming little bridge over the River Gwash (the stream flowing into Rutland Water). -
Nottingham Road / South Street, Giltbrook) (Prohibition of Waiting) Traffic Regulation Order 2019 (5274)
Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 The Nottinghamshire County Council (Nottingham Road / South Street, Giltbrook) (Prohibition of Waiting) Traffic Regulation Order 2019 (5274) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Nottinghamshire County Council proposes to make an Order under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, Traffic Management Act 2004, as amended, and The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (County of Nottinghamshire) Designation Order 2008 (SI 2008 No. 1086), as amended, the effects of which will be in respect of roads at Giltbrook in the Borough of Broxtowe: - 1. Vehicles will be prevented from waiting At Any Time at the following roads: - NOTTINGHAM ROAD, (Giltbrook) (the north-east side) from a point 10 metres north-west of its junction with South Street in a south-easterly direction to a point 12 meters south-east of that junction SOUTH STREET, (Giltbrook) (the north-west side) from its junction with Nottingham Road in a north-easterly direction for 10 metres SOUTH STREET, (Giltbrook) (the south-east side) from its junction with Nottingham Road in a north-easterly direction for 12 metres Relevant documents may be inspected at:- (a) The Nottinghamshire County Council, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham NG2 7QP. (b) Kimberley Library, Main Street, Eastwood, Nottingham NG16 2LY Or by visiting the County Council’s website (https://consult.nottinghamshire.gov.uk) Written comments / objections (stating grounds and quoting ref. 5274 ) must be received by me by 24th day of September 2019. The provisions are required to improve visibility at the junctions and to protect the dropped crossing facilities. Improvements Manager Via East Midlands Major Projects and Improvements Bilsthorpe Depot Bilsthorpe Business Park Bilsthorpe Nottinghamshire NG22 8ST or by e-mail – [email protected] . -
Local Plan Review Issues and Options Consultation Document
1 Rutland Local Plan Review Issues and Options Consultation Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 How can sites for new housing and other development be put forward? ........................... 6 Neighbourhood Plans............................................................................................................ 8 What role should the Local Plan take in coordinating neighbourhood plans? .................... 8 The spatial portrait, vision and objectives .............................................................................. 9 Are changes to the spatial portrait, vision or objectives needed? ...................................... 9 The spatial strategy ............................................................................................................. 10 Are changes to the settlement hierarchy needed? ........................................................... 10 How much new housing will be needed? ......................................................................... 16 Will sites for employment, retail or other uses need to be allocated?............................... 18 What type of new housing is going to be needed? .......................................................... 19 How will new development be apportioned between the towns and villages? .................. 21 How will new growth be apportioned between Oakham and Uppingham? ....................... 23 Site allocations ................................................................................................................... -
Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland -
English Hundred-Names
l LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd 30. Nr 1. ,~ ,j .11 . i ~ .l i THE jl; ENGLISH HUNDRED-NAMES BY oL 0 f S. AND ER SON , LUND PHINTED BY HAKAN DHLSSON I 934 The English Hundred-Names xvn It does not fall within the scope of the present study to enter on the details of the theories advanced; there are points that are still controversial, and some aspects of the question may repay further study. It is hoped that the etymological investigation of the hundred-names undertaken in the following pages will, Introduction. when completed, furnish a starting-point for the discussion of some of the problems connected with the origin of the hundred. 1. Scope and Aim. Terminology Discussed. The following chapters will be devoted to the discussion of some The local divisions known as hundreds though now practi aspects of the system as actually in existence, which have some cally obsolete played an important part in judicial administration bearing on the questions discussed in the etymological part, and in the Middle Ages. The hundredal system as a wbole is first to some general remarks on hundred-names and the like as shown in detail in Domesday - with the exception of some embodied in the material now collected. counties and smaller areas -- but is known to have existed about THE HUNDRED. a hundred and fifty years earlier. The hundred is mentioned in the laws of Edmund (940-6),' but no earlier evidence for its The hundred, it is generally admitted, is in theory at least a existence has been found. -
Uppingham Parish Plan
UPPINGHAM PARISH PLAN OCTOBER 2007 UPPINGHAM PARISH PLAN Introduction In April 2006 a steering group was formed with the support of the Rural Community Council and Uppingham Town Council to prepare a plan for the future of Uppingham. We are grateful to the staff of both Councils for their help and encouragement. The group prepared a questionnaire that was delivered to all households in the town early in 2007. The responses to this questionnaire were analysed and it is relevant that more than 50% of respondents described themselves as retired. The views of the respondents form the plan and it is clear that they like their town and are concerned about changes taking place without consultation. However they accept that if changes must take place such changes take into account their views and the character and history of the town. The plan is to be taken into account by the Town Council, Rutland County Council, National Government and statutory service providers in matters affecting Uppingham. The group has considered it important to provide a background to the plan by reference to history and the town at the present time. We believe all facts to be correct and apologise if there are any errors or omissions. Neil Hermsen – Chairman of the Steering Group A little local history Although Uppingham does not appear in the Domesday Book there is little doubt that a set- tlement existed for many years before the Norman Conquest. The name, deriving from the “Ham of the Yppingas” meaning “people of the upland”, indicates that it came into existence by the early 6th century but the settlement may have come into being even earlier.