DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma Department Wildlife Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma Department Wildlife Conservation BIENNIAL REPORT Of The Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation State of Oklahoma For The Biennium July 1,1956-- June 30,1958 BIENNIAL REPORT For The Biennium July 1, 1956-June 30, 1958 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION State of Oklahoma A report to the Governor, the State Legislature, the Sportsmen and Conservationists of Oklahoma and All Others Contributing to a Program of Wildlife Conservation and Restoration in Okla­ homa. CONTENTS Page Letter of Referral 4 Foreword 5 Organization of Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Department. 8 Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission 10 Fiscal Division 13 Statistical Information 15 Fisheries Division 23 Federal Aid and Game Management 28 State Projects 34 Law Enforcement Division . 38 Information-Education Division 41 Lands Controlled by the Department 46 Permission to reprint material contained is granted provided proper credit is given this publication. Letter of Referral To His Excellency Raymond Gary, Governor, To The Honorable Legislature, And The Sportsmen Of The State of Oklahoma: On behalf of the members of the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission we submit to you our Biennial Re­ port of the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission comprising the period from July 1, 1956 to June 30, 1958. This report represents many years of continuous progress and service to the sportsmen and the people of the State of Oklahoma, not only from a physical standpoint but also from a financial, biological, and a sociological nature as well. The progress of this department has always considered conservation not only in wildlife but soil, water, and other natural resources. We believe it can be said that we have many and more species of wildlife in the State of Oklahoma than we have had in the past. The success and progress of a wildlife conservation department largely comes about through the contribution of the Commission, the Director, and the entire personnel through their efforts to bring about more hunting and fishing for more people for a longer period of time. The constructive advice, counsel and cooperation from sportsmen's groups, farmers and ranchers, and all youth organizations of the state have contributed much to the overall program. This department from a recreational standpoint, has be­ come one that is recognized by the old and the young for outdoor recreation and sportsmanship that can, and will be enjoyed by our people of today and the future generations of tomorrow. Respectfully submitted, OKLAHOMA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT CLARENCE BURCH, Director JAMES W. McMAHAN, Chairman MAURICE C. FINKLEA, Vice-Chairman DAN TANKERSLEY, Secretary LOUIS M. BURTSCHI, Member GEORGE L. KNAPP, JR., Member RAYMOND H. LUCAS, Member GEORGE F. SCHULTZ, Member L. A. W. VINCENT, Member FOREWORD This report is published each two years by the Department of Wildlife Conservation of the State of Oklahoma to review the De­ partment's operation and progress during the past biennium. It is a report to the Governor, members of the State Legislature, sports­ men and conservationists interested in keeping abreast of wildlife conservation affairs in their state. Oklahoma's State Game and Fish Department (now the Okla­ homa Wildlife Conservation Department) came into existence in 1909, two years after statehood. On July 3, 1956, Senate Bill 4, Wildlife Constitutional Amendment, was voted by the people of Oklahoma. The Amendment proposed to amend the Oklahoma Constitution to create a Department of Wildlife Conservation and an Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission in lieu of the 1909 State Game and Fish Department and Commission. An Act of the 1957 Legislature vitalizing provisions of Article 26 of the Oklahoma Constitution changed the name Game and Fish Department to Wildlife Conservation Department of the State of Oklahoma. Constitutional authority for the operation of the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Department shall be governed by the Wildlife Conservation Director under such rules, regulations and policies as may be prescribed from time to time by the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission. The Department is organized into five divisions. The supervisor of each division is responsible to the Director for activities of the division. The Fisheries Division and the Federal Aid and Game Management Division are further organized into sections with in­ termediate supervisors who are responsible for specialized functions. The Department and Commission operate on revenue derived from the sale of licenses and permits, Federal Aid, fines, magazine subscription fees and miscellaneous collections. The only appropri­ ation received from the Legislature is one for $38,500.00 to be expended by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service for predator control and one for $2,500.00 expended by the Department for crow control. The further break-down of licenses, revenue income and expendi­ tures will be given in detail by the Fiscal Division. There are approximately 615,000 fishing and hunting license buyers in Oklahoma. The state ranks sixteenth among the 48 states on fishing licenses and thirty-eighth on hunting. Certain license- exempt groups in the state bring the total number of fishermen and hunters to an estimated one million participants. With that many people sharing in hunting and fishing throughout the state and with more leisure time among working people, with improved highways and increased surface acres of water, the Department has a big job to perform to keep a sufficient supply of fish and game available. The problem does not end there, for the Department is also charged with building a supply and maintaining such for the future as well as the present. Conservation means wise use of natural resources now and in the future. Wildlife is no different from man or domestic animals in that the basic needs are food, water and shelter. The conservation of soil and water will eventually benefit all phases of wildlife with food and cover. The farmer and rancher play a most important role in the overall program. We are more than pleased with the attitude of sportsmen and the Oklahoma Outdoor Council in regard to the Department's program to provide more hunting and fishing for a longer period of time. The Wildlife Conservation Department and the Commission spend money in all sections of the state to further the wildlife con­ servation program in order to develop and insure its future. The Commission's policy is to spend the sportsmen's money wisely. Both the Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department realize their responsibility to the sportsmen and landowners of the state, especially the individual who buys hunting and fishing licenses. We believe sportsmen will likewise realize their responsibilities to the Department and to the people in general in helping to carry out a well balanced wildlife conservation program. The Department requested, early in 1957, a job and organiza­ tion analysis and an employee class specifications report from the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission. Mr. Britt J. May- field, Chief, Technical Services Division of the Oklahoma State Employment Service, with five field personnel spent four months in interviewing all personnel in the field and office in order to com­ plete this job analysis. The report contained occupational data developed through an analysis of 217 regular positions in the Okla­ homa Wildlife Conservation Department. Job analysis may be defined as the process of determining and re­ porting significant information on requirements of jobs. It involves the determination and systematic recording of a particular com­ bination of duties and responsibilities necessitating the employment of a worker, and the special skills, knowledges and abilities required of that worker for satisfactory performance. On these findings the Commission and Department have made a sincere effort to operate the Department on a merit system basis. District and state-wide personnel conferences have done much to give the personnel of the Department an overall picture of the Wildlife Conservation program as well as better working relations among the various divisions. In the pages that follow you will gain a complete picture of how your Wildlife Conservation Department functions to maintain and restore Oklahoma's wildlife resources. DEPARTMENT FIELD PERSONNEL — Field employees are the advanced con­ tact medium of the Department of Wildlife Conservation. Their duties vary with the particular local field work they are to administer for wildlife con­ servation. In-training-personnel schools are conducted periodically by the department with this personnel conference meeting at Oklahoma University, North Campus Base, Norman, Oklahoma. ORGANIZATION OF OKLAHOMA WILDLIFE GOVERNOR COMMISSION FISCAL FIELD SERVICE DIVISION DIVISION FIELD I PREDATORY HATCHERIES PROPERTY CO-ORDINATOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS Y ENFORCEMENT LICENSE D1STR. rivrriEsU i( CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT LEGISLATURE Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission COMMISSIONERS for the Department of Wildlife Conservation are, seated, from left, Louis Burtschi, Chickasha; James W. McMahan, Okemah; Raymond Lucas, Spiro; Dan Tankersley, Oklahoma City; standing, from left, George Knapp, Jr., Tulsa; George Schultz, Medford; Clarence Burch, Department director; Maurice Finklea, Warner; and L. A. W. Vincent, Arnett. The Constitutional Amendment provides that the eight members of the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission shall be appointed by the Governor by and with the consent of the Senate and shall be removable only
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Thesis
    University of Southern Queensland Faculty of COMMUNICATIONS FOR SMART GRID SUBSTATION MONITORING USING WIMAX PROTOCOL. A dissertation submitted by Sreekanth Anumula In fulfillment of the requirements of Courses ENG8411 and 8412 Research Project Master Thesis ABSTRACT The SMARTGRID is a general term for a series of infrastructural changes applied to the electric transmission and distribution systems. By using the latest communication and computing technology, additional options such as Condition Monitoring can now be implemented to further improve and optimise complex electricity supply grid operation. Lifecycle optimisation of high voltage assets and other system components in the utility provide a case in point. Today Utility experts agree that application of scheduled maintenance is not the effective use of resources. To reduce maintenance expenses and unnecessary outages and repairs of equipment due to scheduled maintenance, utilities are adopting condition based approaches. Real time online monitoring of substation parameters can be achieved by retrofitting the existing substation with SMARTGRID technology. The IEC 61850 is a common protocol meant for Substation Automation Systems, designed for the purpose of establishing interoperability, one that all manufacturers of all different assets must comply with. This thesis advocates the estimation of bandwidth required for monitoring a substation after retrofitting the existing substation with smart communication technologies. This includes establishing a latest wireless communication infrastructure from the substation to the control centre and evaluating the performance modelling and simulating the physical layer of communication technologies such as WIMAX (IEEE802.16) and MICROWAVE point to point using MATLAB SIMULINK and RADIO mobile online simulation software. Also, link budget of the satellite communication for the same application is calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • Xavier University Newswire
    Xavier University Exhibit All Xavier Student Newspapers Xavier Student Newspapers 1983-10-27 Xavier University Newswire Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio) Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper Recommended Citation Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio), "Xavier University Newswire" (1983). All Xavier Student Newspapers. 467. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper/467 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Xavier Student Newspapers at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Xavier Student Newspapers by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume 69, Number 8 Xavier University, Cincinnati Thursday, October 27, 1983 WVXU turns up money and power BY BILL KRONENBERGER funds. How~ver, the fund drive has drive in the spring, Myers said. At permiSSton from· the Federal Com­ tains that the power boost is a good . Newa EdHcir ·grown into a larger source of revenue . that time, listeners may donate $20 munication Commission to ·boost its .idea: "We think that we have a good "Showcase ·,83," WVXU's week­ _forWVXU. ·· · . · · for a basic membership, $25 for a wattage. from 6400 watts to 10,200 radio system, and .we'd like to. make long fund drive, ·finished almost "go-getter" membership, or $50 for watts. Myers noted that the increased it available to as many people as $2,000 above the goal of$50,000, ac­ The station's listeners pledged a· sustaining membership. Donations power will allow the station to get possible."· cording . to Kathy Myers, operations most of the money for "Showcase of $91.70 (WVXU's broadcast fre­ more listeners and suppon.
    [Show full text]
  • RVN2: the Riverina's Own Television Service
    The Riverina’s Own Television Service CSU Regional Archives Summer Research Project By Maikha Ly 2008/09 RVN2 – Riverina’s Own Television: By Maikha Ly Page 1 of 27 Contents Introduction Page 3 Formation of Television in Australia Page 4 Formation of Television in the Riverina Page 4 Opening Night Page 6 RVN‐2 in the Community Page 8 Television’s Impact Page 10 RVN‐2/AMV‐4 Merger Page 11 Paul Ramsay and The Prime Network Page 13 Aggregation Looms Page 15 Changes for the future Page 17 RVN‐2 Today Page 18 Appendixes Page 19 RVN2 – Riverina’s Own Television: By Maikha Ly Page 2 of 27 Introduction RVN‐2 was established in 1964 as Wagga Wagga’s dedicated local Television Station, providing a television service to the people of the Riverina and South‐ West Slopes area of New South Wales, both in the production of local television programs such as the news service, and the broadcasting of purchased television programs seen to Metropolitan Audiences. RVN‐2 refers to the broadcast license call sign of the station, “2” being the channel number of the frequency. However, RVN‐2 was also the name and reference attributed to the station and the channel for many decades amongst viewers, and up to today, those who experienced RVN‐2 sometimes still refer to the channel as that. RVN‐2 was more than just a television service. Its identity on air and its Kooringal Studio facility became local institutions equivalent to that of a landmark. The station was a major local industry, at one time employing 150 local people in various roles from production to technical to clerical, as well as providing an introduction and training ground for young television employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Video and Television Technology Newnes Is an Imprint of Elsevier Science
    Dictionary of Video and Television Technology Newnes is an imprint of Elsevier Science. Copyright © 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. [This page intentionally left blank.] No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, Elsevier Science prints its books on acid-free paper whenever possible. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN: 1-878707-99-X British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The publisher offers special discounts on bulk orders of this book. For information, please contact: Manager of Special Sales Elsevier Science 225 Wildwood Avenue Woburn, MA 01801-2041 Tel: 781-904-2500 Fax: 781-904-2620 For information on all Newnes publications available, contact our World Wide Web home page at: http://www.newnespress.com 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America Dictionary of Video and Television Technology Keith Jack Vladimir Tsatsulin An imprint of Elsevier Science Amsterdam Boston London New York Oxford Paris San Diego San Francisco Singapore Sydney Tokyo [This is a blank page.] CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................. vii About the Authors .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Entertaining Australia
    2016 Annual Report Entertaining Australia 2 The Year in Brief 4 Chairman’s Address 6 Chief Executive’s Address 8 Operational results 12 Other businesses 14 Nine’s place in the community 16 Governance 18 Building the future 20 Board of Directors 22 Directors’ Report 27 Remuneration Report 45 Operating and Financial Review 49 Financial Report 107 Shareholder Information ibc Corporate Directory Create Great Content Distribute it Broadly Engage Audiences and Advertisers Nine Entertainment Co. 2016 Annual Report Entertaining Australia Nine Entertainment Co. 1 In FY16, NEC reported Group EBITDA from continuing businesses of $202 million, down 7% on FY15 on revenue of $1.3 billion. Net Profit after Tax declined by 7% to $120.3 million compared to the Pro Forma FY15 result. Earnings per share were down 0.7% on a lower share count due to the on-market buy-back. Statutory Net Profit after Specific Items was $325 million, inclusive of the profit on the sale of Nine Live. Operationally, the impact of a difficult Free To Air television market was offset by a group-wide cost improvement and double digital EBITDA growth from a refocussed digital business. Operating free cash flow for the year, ex the cash impact of the Warner Specific Item, was $157 million. Net Debt at 30 June 2016 was $178 million — during the year, $164 million was returned to shareholders through dividends and the on-market share buy-back, $89 million was invested in Southern Cross Media and a further $37 million in Stan. $m FY16 FY15 Variance Revenue1 1,282.4 1,371.4 -6.5% Group EBITDA1 201.7 217.2 -7.1% NPAT, before Specific Items1 120.3 129.5 -7.1% Statutory Net NPAT, after Specific Items 324.8 (592.2) — Operating Free Cash Flow1 157.4 237.5 -33.7% Earnings per Share, before Specific Items — cents1 13.7 13.8 -0.7% Dividend per Share — cents 12.0 9.2 +30.4% 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Published Version) of the Work
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Rimmer, Matthew (2003) Precious images: Copyright law and television broadcasts. Incite, 24(11), p. 10, 2003. [Article] This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/86808/ c Copyright 2003 Incite This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https:// www.alia.org.au/ publications-and-news/ incite Precious images: copyright law and television broadcasts O ver the last several years, Austral­ broadcast could be defined as a television ian media magnate Kerry Packer program, or where applicable, a segment has sought to maximise the value of a program [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/ of the intellectual property assets of the tel­ cases/cth/federal_ct/2001/108.html], His evision station Channel Nine.
    [Show full text]
  • Should TV Move?
    Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy Should TV Move? Giles Tanner Swinburne University of Technology Jock Given Swinburne University of Technology Abstract: This article considers five options for the future of television transmission in Australia. We begin by describing the unprecedented threats to broadcast television’s business model and power. We then set out the global picture for terrestrial TV broadcasting and options for modernising the Australian system. We do this within a framework that asks what now constitutes “television”, because the services that viewers and users now treat as TV are broader than the subset that have carried most of the public policy freight for decades. The five options we consider are: first, do nothing much apart from adopting further improvements in compression technology; second, replace the current transmission system with a new, specialised terrestrial broadcast platform; third, migrate terrestrial TV to a direct- to-home satellite platform; fourth, move over-the-air TV online; fifth, design some sort of hybrid of Options 1 to 4. Finally, we arrive at some tentative conclusions. Keywords: television, digital switchover, NBN, wireless broadband, spectrum auctions Introduction TV should move. So argued MIT Media Lab co-founder Nicholas Negroponte in the 1980s as part of a bigger idea he called “trading places”. Most TV sets and telephones, at the time, were immobile. Switching television from over-the-air transmission to wired networks would enable it to offer viewers more channels and better quality pictures by deploying additional bandwidth. Telephone services were delivered over copper landlines to fixed locations in homes and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Network Holdings Limited ACN 081 327
    10 October 2017 Ten Network Holdings Limited ACN 081 327 068 (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (TEN) Explanatory Statement to shareholders, and Independent Expert's Report We refer to previous announcements regarding the Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA) entered into by Ten Network Holdings Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (TEN) and CBS International Television Australia Pty Limited (CBS Australia), among others, following approval of the DOCA at the second meetings of creditors for TEN and the other Ten Group companies (listed in the attached schedule). It is a condition to completion and effectuation of the DOCA that the Deed Administrators (as Deed Administrators of TEN) obtain a Court order pursuant to section 444GA of the Corporations Act granting leave to the Deed Administrators to transfer all of the shares in TEN to CBS Australia or its nominee for nil consideration. The Deed Administrators have now applied for this order in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Attached to this announcement is a copy of a letter which will be sent to all shareholders of TEN. For the benefit of shareholders of TEN and to provide further information on the section 444GA application, also attached to this announcement is an Explanatory Statement that describes the process and provides details on how a shareholder who wishes to make an objection to the share transfer should do so. The Explanatory Statement includes an Independent Expert's Report prepared by KPMG Corporate Finance (IER) which values the equity in TEN. The IER concludes that the equity in TEN has nil value.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report to Shareholders
    Annual Report 2020 NOVEMBER 2018 YOUNGRICHAUSTRALIA’S WEALTHIEST UNDER 40 Liftout inside Kayla Itsines FITNESS QUEEN Shebuilta$490millionfortunewithoutbreakingasweat. Plus So why aren’t there more women entrepreneurs? DESIGN SPECIAL By Julie-anne Sprague AUSTRALIA’SMOSTFINELYCRAFTEDHOUSE| ROBOTICPUPPIES&MOREFUTUREFUN Overview Impact of COVID-19 In FY20, Nine continued to focus on investing in its long-term growth assets and improving the operating performance of its traditional media portfolio, despite the difficult operating environment. The outbreak of COVID-19 The core growth assets of Stan, 9Now, Digital Publishing and Domain, now all scale businesses in Australia had a marked in their own right with strong market positions, contributed 32% of Group Revenue1 and 43% of impact on Nine’s FY20 results, EBITDA1 for the year. The traditional Free To Air business contributed around 35% of Group EBITDA, particularly in the 4th quarter. down from 50% in FY19 (pro forma4 basis)1. Together, these changes reflect the continuing evolution The effective shut-down of the of Nine’s business to the digital platform. country in mid-March had a significant impact across all of Result in brief Nine’s businesses. In FY20, on a continuing business basis, Nine reported Group EBITDA of $397 million, which, Nine quickly transitioned the on a like-basis (pre AASB16), was down 16% on FY19. Revenues across the Group fell by 7% to majority of its work-force to $2.2 billion, as the operating environment impacted on all advertising markets. Net Profit after ‘work at home’ with minimal Tax was $141 million, which equated to a decline of 19% on a like (pre-AASB16) basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Brendon Agpasa Submission To: Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Inquiry Into Media Diversity in Australia
    Brendon Agpasa Submission to: Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Inquiry into Media diversity in Australia December 2020 Introduction Brendon Agpasa welcomes the opportunity to provide a submission to the Inquiry by the Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications into Media diversity in Australia. Media diversity supports analogue and digital radio rollout Digital radio uses the DAB+ standard and is available in all capital cities (Sydney, Canberra, Brisbane, Melbourne, Adelaide, Hobart, Darwin, Perth) and regional centres such as Mandurah, Australia uses the AAC+ codec provided with upgraded DAB+ standard. The ABC, SBS, commercial radio stations, and community radio stations in each market provide many of their services and a few digital-only services on the digital platform. Despite the ABC and SBS services extends into regional Australia on a separate multiplex (both on 9C, 206.352 MHz) providing the same services as in 8 capital cities, the Digital Radio Mondiale was exported to Australia, becoming the first digital radio technology in metropolitan, regional and remote Australia to have DRM simulcasts AM and FM services, when AM and FM services accept the DAB+ and DRM signals. According to this, the content licences of 63 ABC Radio stations, 7 SBS Radio stations, 261 commercial radio stations, 450+ community radio services, 2610+ narrowcast radio services and 80+ narrowband radio services would be increased as expands to be simulcasts in digital formats on both DAB+ and Digital Radio Mondiale services across all the licences in most regions. The Federal Government in funding to help commercial, community, narrowcast and narrowband broadcasters with the costs of beginning digital broadcasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Cycles of Digital Television in Australia
    On this view, interests beyond the defence in light of the High Court’s 2 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty broadcasting industry may be findings. Given that the substantial Ltd (2002) 118 FCR 417. 3 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty concerned that the uncertainty part test is underdeveloped in the Ltd (2001) 108 FCR 235. produced by the High Court’s decision context of Part IV of the Act, there 4 See eg Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v will exert an unfortunate stifling effect remains the distinct possibility that Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1999) 48 IPR 333 at 340, Time Warner Entertainment Co on the televised public domain, as there will be another series of appeals Ltd v Channel 4 Television Corporation PLC various forms of comment and before the matter is ultimately (1993) 28 IPR 459 at 468 and Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1142 at criticism which make use of other resolved. par 61. broadcasters’ content may disappear 5 Above, n 1 at [75], from our TV screens.9 Brendan Plant is a Law Graduate in the Sydney office of Allens Arthur 6 Ibid. The Panel case currently awaits Robinson, and Niranjan Arasaratnam 7 Above, n 1 at [155], 8 See, for example, Michael Handler, The Panel reconsideration by the Full Federal is a partner in the firm's Hong Kong office. Case and Television Broadcast Copyright’ (2003) Court, which will determine the 25 SydLR 390. application of the substantial part test 1 Network Ten Pty Limited vTCN Channel Nine 9 See Melissa de Zwart, 'Seriously entertaining: Pty Limited [2004] HCA14.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Inquiry Into the Australian Film and Television Industry
    SUBMISSION TO THE INQUIRY INTO THE AUSTRALIAN FILM AND TELEVISION INDUSTRY 7 April 2017 Mr Luke Howarth MP Chair Standing Committee on Communications and the Arts Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 By email: [email protected] Introduction Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Communications and the Arts inquiry into the Australian Film and Television Industry, and the factors contributing to the growth and sustainability of the Australian film and television industry. This submission is made on behalf of the three major regional television broadcasters, Prime Media Group (Prime), the WIN Network (WIN) and Southern Cross Austereo (SCA). Challenges to the growth and sustainability of the Australian television industry Prime, WIN and SCA play a vital role in their local communities, broadcasting free to air television to their viewers, employing locally, supporting local businesses and playing a central role in the life of their regional communities. With the proliferation of alternate sources of entertainment and the rise of tech media companies like Google and Facebook, the free to air television industry is facing a decline in audiences and revenue, and the regional television industry faces its own unique challenges above and beyond those faced by metropolitan networks. There is a significant question mark over the on-going ability of the industry to provide the current level of local, and other services, to all the regional viewers it seeks to serve. The aggregation model that was introduced in the late 1980s has not met the expectations of either the regional television industry or our regional television viewers.
    [Show full text]