Nfta Rfp Boilerplate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nfta Rfp Boilerplate ADDENDUM 1 RFP 4362 TRANSIT BUS SEAT COMPONENTS NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY November 20, 2013 TO ALL CONCERNED: The original contract document for Workers' Comp Actuarial Services is hereby amended in accordance with the following: You may contact Jeff Sweet at 716-881-4722 to make an appointment to view the drawings and the buses. The addendum shall form a part of the contract documents. Proponents must attach a copy of this addendum to the contract documents submitted with their proposals. Andrea Herald Procurement Manager 1 NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR TRANSIT BUS SEAT COMPONENTS NFTA RFP 4362 The following items are to be included with the proposal and made part of any agreement entered into pursuant to this RFP. PLEASE SUBMIT 4 HARD COPIES OF THE RFP AND 1(one) ELECTRONIC COPY. Cover Letter Description of products/services Firm, Management and Staff Qualifications Resumes References Itemized Cost Proposal Non-Collusive Proposal Certificate Disclosure of Prior Non-Responsibility Determinations Certificate Regarding Lobbying Buy America Certificate Company and Contact Information Form Contractor Certification Form ST-220-TD PROPONENTS MUST REGISTER AND DOWNLOAD THIS RFP FROM THE NFTA WEB SITE, WWW.NFTA.COM, IN ORDER TO BE NOTIFIED OF SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS. ONLY REGISTERED SUPPLIERS WILL RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF NEW RFP’S AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. THE RFP NUMBER MUST BE REFERENCED ON ALL SUBMITTALS AND CORRESPONDENCE. 2 NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 4362 Proposals will be received by the undersigned until 11:00 a.m., on DECEMBER 11, 2013 for: TRANSIT BUS SEAT COMPONENTS in accordance with the attached proposal documents. The Authority reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, or to waive any informality in the proposal. Proposals shall be submitted in a sealed envelope showing Proponent’s name and addressed to: NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Department of Procurement - Fifth Floor Attention: Andrea Herald 181 Ellicott Street Buffalo, New York 14203 716-855- 7356 phone, 716-855-6676 fax email [email protected] www.nfta.com MARK ON LOWER LEFT HAND CORNER OF ENVELOPE: RFP: 4362 DUE DATE: DECEMBER 11, 2013 FOR: TRANSIT BUS SEAT COMPONENTS NAME OF PROPONENT: PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED AT 181 ELLICOTT STREET, 5TH FLOOR, PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT, BEFORE THE TIME DESIGNATED FOR OPENING IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED. All correspondence, communications and/or contact with the NFTA in regard to any aspect of this proposal shall be with the Procurement Official designated above or her designated representative. Prospective proponents, or their representatives, shall not make contact with or communicate with any representatives of the NFTA, including employees and consultants, other than the designated Procurement Official, in regard to any aspect of this proposal. Andrea Herald Procurement Manager 3 SCOPE OF WORK It is the intent of these specifications to provide the minimum acceptable criteria for the procurement and delivery to Buffalo, New York, of replacement seat and seat back cushion assemblies and seat and seat back inserts for transit bus seats. The NFTA currently operates 181 low floor transit buses that require replacement passenger seating components. The actual number of replacement components to be purchased is not guaranteed. The term of an agreement will be four years. Materials will be purchased as required. The specified materials must be configured as a “kit”. A kit must contain the materials necessary to replace all cushions assemblies and seat inserts on one bus. NFTA staff will install the materials purchased. A Brand Name may be used to identify the characteristics and level of quality that will satisfy NFTA’s requirements. Proposed ‘or equal’ parts must be of the same quality and comply with the manufacturer’s requirements and specifications; physical, functional and /or performance characteristics; and not compromise any manufacturer's warranties. Proposers shall state the proposed manufacturers name and part number and provide documentation sufficient, in the NFTA’s judgment, to permit a determination as to whether the parts proposed constitute an approved ‘or equal’. If non-original equipment manufacturer parts are proposed, written documentation must be provided guaranteeing that the parts will install and perform the same as original equipment manufacturer parts. 1.0 REQUIREMENTS The furnished materials must meet or exceed the original equipment manufacturer's requirements and must not adversely affect a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) certification when installed on a bus. 1.1 Seat and Seat Back Cushion Assemblies • The seat cushion assemblies must fit an American Seating type 6466 seat frame. • An assembly must consist of a rigid component, a full depth foam cushion and a fabric covering. • The fabric covering must surround the rigid component and the foam cushion. • The cushion assembly must include a means of fastening the assembly to an existing seat frame. • The foam must be a fabricated polyurethane foam that is compliant with FMVSS 302 and weighs more than 2 lbs per cubic foot. • The fabric covering must be Holdsworth Aura #CAF322 (www.bergenseat.com) or approved equal. The fabric must be a blend of 4 wool and polyester fibers woven as a deep tufted pile suitable for use as upholstery. • The fabric pattern and color must be approved by the NFTA. 1.2 Seat and Seat Back Inserts • The inserts must fit an American Seating type 6468 seat frame. • The inserts must be made of long strand preformed fiberglass. • The seat insert must have a metallic grommet arranged as a drain hole. • The insert color must be American Seating #989 blue and must be integral to the fiberglass. • The insert texture and color must be approved by the NFTA. • The inserts must have a means of fastening the insert to an existing seat frame. 1.3 Bus Information • The kits must be configured for the buses listed in this section. This section also contains a “Sales Order” number from the original equipment manufacturer that references the drawings and a bill of material for each type of bus. • Although the Sales Order numbers listed in this section specify cloth covered fiberglass inserts the NFTA does not want a cloth covering. Inserts must be uncovered or bare fiberglass. Bus Bus Length # of American Model Bus NFTA Fleet / Drive Buses in Seating Sales Year Manufacturer Designation Type Fleet Order # 1999 Nova 2000 40' Diesel 20 052173 2001 Gillig 2100 A 40' Diesel 19 057618 2001 Gillig 2100 B 40' Diesel 20 061623 2002 Gillig 2200 A 40' Diesel 16 065062 2002 Gillig 2200 B 40' Diesel 26 066545 2004 Gillig 2400 29' Diesel 22 074565 2005 Gillig 2500 40' Die sel 15 079365 2006 Gillig 2600 40' Hybrid 30 084982 2007 Gillig 2700 40' Hybrid 13 090161 5 2.0 WARRANTY The furnished materials must have a one year warranty covering manufacturing defects beginning on the date of installation on a bus. The installation will occur within two months of delivery. 3.0 DELIVERY The materials ordered must be delivered to: NFT Metro Storeroom 78 East Ferry St. Buffalo, NY 14209 Materials must be received within 60 days after receipt of a purchase order. 4.0 COST Submit an all inclusive (including shipping charges) cost per kit for each bus type listed for each year of an agreement. Use the attached Price List to submit costs. 5.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION An NFTA Selection Team will evaluate proposals. The team will select the proponent whose proposal is most advantageous to the NFTA, considering the evaluation criteria. SELECTION PROCEDURE 1. The selection team will evaluate and score all proposals received. 2. Proposals not meeting minimum requirements and those that are not responsive, will not be given further consideration. 3. Proposals in the competitive range will be determined. These proponents may be asked to present their proposal to the selection team. 4. When presentations, discussions and negotiations are concluded, NFTA may request revised proposals and /or best and final offers from responsible proponents in the competitive range. 5. Proposals will be re-evaluated and scored. The selection team will recommend that the proponent with the highest overall score be awarded the contract. The recommendation must then be approved by the NFTA Board of Commissioners prior to the execution of a contract. NOTE: NFTA reserves the right to make the award based upon the initial proposals submitted, without presentation or discussions. 6 EVALUATION CRITERIA (Listed in order of importance) 1. Technical Criteria: Compliance with technical specifications. 40% 2. Cost. 40% 3. Qualifications and Experience: demonstrated ability in the industry, references, warranty, delivery. 20% 7 PRICE PROPOSAL Bus # of American Cost/Kit Cost/Kit Cost/Kit Cost/Kit Bus Length / Buses Seating Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Model Bus NFTA Fleet Drive in Sales Order Year Manufacturer Designation Type Fleet # 1999 Nova 2000 40' Diesel 20 052173 2001 Gillig 2100 A 40' Diesel 19 057618 2001 Gillig 2100 B 40' Diesel 20 061623 2002 Gillig 2200 A 40' Diesel 16 065062 2002 Gillig 2200 B 40' Diesel 26 066545 2004 Gillig 2400 29' Diesel 22 074565 2005 Gillig 2500 40' Diesel 15 079365 40' 2006 Gillig 2600 Hybrid 30 084982 40' 2007 Gillig 2700 Hybrid 13 090161 Payment Terms: ______________________ Lead Time:____________________ Submitted By: (Authorized Signature)______________________________________ Company:___________________________________________________________ 8 PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. INTRODUCTION This Request for Proposal ("RFP") invites proposals for TRANSIT BUS SEAT COMPONENTS as set forth herein. These services may be modified during contract negotiations between the Proponent and the NFTA. The Proponent is encouraged to use its previous knowledge and experience to develop a proposal to meet the NFTA’s needs and a time schedule for completion within the constraints set forth in the project description and technical requirements. This RFP does not commit the NFTA to negotiate a contract, nor does it obligate the NFTA to pay for any costs incurred in preparation and submission of proposals or costs incurred prior to entering into a formal agreement.
Recommended publications
  • Thank You! a T T a C H M E N T
    AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION Bus & Paratransit Conference Planning Subcommittee Hilton Americas-Houston ● Room 340 Saturday, October 11, 2014 ● 1-3 p.m. MEETING AGENDA PLAN BUS & PARATRANSIT CONFERENCE MAY 3-6, 2015 Omni Fort Worth Hotel, 1300 Houston St., & Fort Worth Convention Center, 1201 Houston St., Fort Worth, TX 1. Welcome and host information – Paul Ballard and Nancy Amos (1 p.m.) 2. Review conference schedule overview and subcommittee’s work plan, decide on NTI courses – Lynne Morsen and Paul Larrousse (1:10) 3. Select abstracts ― breakout discussion groups organized by topics or “routes of study” to form sessions with abstracts – All (1:20 p.m.) 4. Identify invitational sessions (not having to do with abstracts) and suggest speakers for invitational / concurrent sessions and large, general sessions – All (2:30 p.m.) 5. 2016 conference in Charlotte, NC – Larry Kopf (2:45 p.m.) 6. Other business (2:50 p.m.) Attachments: 1. 2015 Bus & Paratransit Conference overview 2. Subcommittee work plan 3. Notes from May 2014 debrief meeting in Kansas City, MO 4. Subcommittee charter 5. Topics for call for papers & presentations 6. List of who receives the e-blast call for papers & presentations 7. Ideas for National Transit Institute courses to offer at the conference 8. 2014 Bus & Paratransit Conference session attendance 9. 2014 conference evaluation survey summary 10. All abstracts organized by route of study Thank you! A T T A C H M E N T 1 AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION MAY 3-6, 2015 BUS & PARATRANSIT CONFERENCE OVERVIEW OMNI FORT WORTH HOTEL, 1300 HOUSTON ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76102 (817) 535-6664 & FORT WORTH CONVENTION CENTER, HOUSTON ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76102 As of August 21, 2014 SAT.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 10-2016 The US Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry David Czerwinski San Jose State University, [email protected] Xu (Cissy) Hartling Salem State University Jing Zhang San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Public Policy Commons, and the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation David Czerwinski, Xu (Cissy) Hartling, and Jing Zhang. "The US Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2016). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 Transportation and California The US Transit Bus Department of Transportation Manufacturing Industry MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-66 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU).
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Memo 2 02202008A
    NIAGARA FRONTIER URBAN AREA FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS i NIAGARA FRONTIER URBAN AREA FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 1.1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................1 1.2 SUBSEQUENT DELIVERABLES..................................................................................1 AIR CARGO SYSTEM PROFILE..............................................................................3 2.1 AIR CARGO SYSTEM PROFILE OVERVIEW................................................................3 2.2 AIRPORT FACILITIES AND ACCESS...........................................................................4 2.3 AIR CARGO CARRIERS..........................................................................................11 2.4 MARKETS AND ROUTES ........................................................................................14 2.5 NEXT STEPS – DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES .........................21 HIGHWAY SYSTEM PROFILE...............................................................................23 3.1 HIGHWAY SYSTEM PROFILE OVERVIEW ................................................................23 3.2 PRIMARY HIGHWAY FREIGHT SYSTEM ..................................................................24 3.3 SECONDARY HIGHWAY FREIGHT SYSTEM .............................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Program Funding\Chapter2
    2001 Annual Report on Public Transportation Assistance Programs in New York State April, 2002 Passenger Transportation Division New York State Department of Transportation Albany, New York 12232-0414 This report was developed, in part, by utilizing Federal Transit Administration Technical Study Grants TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I INTRODUCTION I-1 II TRANSIT FINANCE AND CAPITAL ASSISTANCE II-1 Statewide Mass Transportation Operating Assistance Program II-1 Background II-1 General Fund II-1 Mass Transportation Operating Assistance Fund II-1 Dedicated Mass Transportation Trust Fund II-4 Locally Generated Subsidies II-4 Payments to Transit Systems II-5 FFY 2001 Federal Transit Allocations and Apportionments II-8 Urbanized Area Formula Program II-8 Non-Urbanized and Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program II-10 Fixed Guideway Modernization II-10 New Start Funding II-11 Discretionary Bus II-11 Jobs Access and Reverse Commute II-11 Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program II-12 FFY 2002 Transportation Appropriations Act Related Provisions II-12 2001 Capital Annual Report II-14 State Capital Assistance Programs for Non-MTA Transit Systems II-14 State Omnibus and Transit Purpose Program II-14 State Transit Dedicated Funds (SDF) II-14 Flexible Transfers to Transit II-15 Obligations and Expenditures II-15 Non-MTA Capital Program Area Emphasis II-15 Bus Replacement II-16 Bus Maintenance and Storage Facilities II-16 Intermodal Transportation Facilities II-17 Other Continuing Transit Capital Needs II-17 III STATUS AND PERFORMANCE OF MAJOR TRANSIT
    [Show full text]
  • A PDF Sample Issue of the News and Views
    RTP News and Views Sample Issue 2008 Free Rapid Transit Press Post Office Box 2383 Downey, Ca 90242 On the Cover Sun Line Orion 512 in downtown Palm Springs in June 2006. (Andrew Novak Photo) Message from the editor: Rapid Transit Press Dedicated to Preserving Transit History Sample Issue 2008 Free RTP News and Views is not affiliated with any transit agency. “I started Rapid Transit Press as a way to share All opinions are those of the authors. Logos appear for historical reference only. transportation information and photos with everyone. The idea of preserving the past is important to me and that is why I write books and this newsletter. The News Subscription Rates and Views is a combination of current news, Individual Issues – Price Varies transportation history and some personal views on transportation. Thank you for purchasing the News and (Effective January 2006 Subscriptions are no longer Views.” available) -Andy (Make checks/Money Orders payable to Andrew Novak) “We have checked and rechecked item by item against official records and eyewitness accounts. We trust those ©2008 Rapid Transit Press mistakes which will inevitably creep in will be few in Reproduction of the News and Views is forbidden without number and minor in importance” written permission from RTP. -Jim Walker www.rapidtransit-press.com Senior Editor Andrew Novak ([email protected]) Editorial Staff T. B. Blackstone Senior Staff Contributors Craig Barnes Edmund Buckley Albert Novak Russ Jones Inside this issue: Pages: Adventures of Super Rider ...........................................18-20
    [Show full text]
  • V:\ANNUAL\01Annual\Chapter 2
    2001 Annual Report on Public Transportation Assistance Programs in New York State April, 2002 Passenger Transportation Division New York State Department of Transportation Albany, New York 12232-0414 This report was developed, in part, by utilizing Federal Transit Administration Technical Study Grants TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I INTRODUCTION I-1 II TRANSIT FINANCE AND CAPITAL ASSISTANCE II-1 Statewide Mass Transportation Operating Assistance Program II-1 Background II-1 General Fund II-1 Mass Transportation Operating Assistance Fund II-1 Dedicated Mass Transportation Trust Fund II-4 Locally Generated Subsidies II-4 Payments to Transit Systems II-5 FFY 2001 Federal Transit Allocations and Apportionments II-8 Urbanized Area Formula Program II-8 Non-Urbanized and Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program II-10 Fixed Guideway Modernization II-10 New Start Funding II-11 Discretionary Bus II-11 Jobs Access and Reverse Commute II-11 Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program II-12 FFY 2002 Transportation Appropriations Act Related Provisions II-12 2001 Capital Annual Report II-14 State Capital Assistance Programs for Non-MTA Transit Systems II-14 State Omnibus and Transit Purpose Program II-14 State Transit Dedicated Funds (SDF) II-14 Flexible Transfers to Transit II-15 Obligations and Expenditures II-15 Non-MTA Capital Program Area Emphasis II-15 Bus Replacement II-16 Bus Maintenance and Storage Facilities II-16 Intermodal Transportation Facilities II-17 Other Continuing Transit Capital Needs II-17 III STATUS AND PERFORMANCE OF MAJOR TRANSIT
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Board Of
    MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ROCHESTER-GENESEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES June 22, 2017 A. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum The meeting was called to order at 12:16pm by Chairman Geoff Astles who determined that a quorum was present. Present on Roll Call: CountyofMonroe BillFaber = 5votes CountyofMonroe DonJeffries = 5votes County of Monroe Kelli O’Connor = 5 votes * City of Rochester William Ansbrow = 2 votes * City of Rochester Jerdine Johnson = 2 votes City of Rochester William McDonald = 2 votes County of Genesee Paul Battaglia = 2 votes County of Livingston Milo I. Turner = 2 votes County of Ontario Geoff Astles = 3 vote County of Orleans Henry Smith = 1 vote County of Seneca Edward W. White = 1 vote County of Wayne Michael P. Jankowski = 3 votes CountyofWyoming RichKosmerl = 1vote Amalgamated Transit Union Tracie Green = 0 votes *Due to their recent appointments by the New York State Legislature these Commissioners have not yet had time to file their Oath of Office with the Department of State and thus our ineligible to vote on any items at this meeting. Total Votes Possible 34 Total Votes Present 28 Votes Needed for Quorum 18 1 Others Present: Scott Adair, Chief Financial Officer David Belaskas, Director of Engineering & Facilities Management Ken Boasi, Director of Scheduling Tom Brede, Public Information Officer Bill Brunet, Conduent Mike Burns, Director of Accounting & Payroll Bill Carpenter, Chief Executive Officer David Cook, VP of Procurement Jay
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership for Ngv Program
    NATIONAL FUEL GAS DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION PARTNERSHIP FOR NGV PROGRAM REPORT TO THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Report date: January 2016 REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014 Prepared by Erik M. Solomon Energy Services Department (716) 857-7003 [email protected] National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation NGV Pilot Program - Report to the New York State PSC Reporting period: January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 Table of Contents I. Background ....................................................................... 1 II. Program Overview ............................................................. 1 A. Program Design ............................................................................. 1 B. Program Objectives and Benefits................................................... 2 C. Program Regulatory Reporting Requirements ............................... 3 D. NGV Market Overview ................................................................... 5 III. Program Results ................................................................ 9 A. Customer Participation ................................................................... 9 B. Documentation and Verification of Project Economics ................. 15 C. Evaluation of Performance and Impact of NGV’s on the Environment .................................................................................. 20 D. Demonstration of the Reliability of NGV’s .................................... 23 E. Development of NGV “Best Practices Guide” .............................
    [Show full text]
  • A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitioning from Diesel Fuel
    State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State Applied Economics Theses Economics and Finance 1-2021 The Great Transition: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of rT ansitioning from Diesel Fuel Buses to Zero Emission Electric Buses for the NFTA in The Buffalo-Niagara Falls MSA Jonathan C. Meyers State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College, [email protected] Advisor Nicole L Hunter First Reader Nicole L Hunter Second Reader Bruce L Fisher Third Reader Frederick Floss Department Chair Frederick Floss Recommended Citation Meyers, Jonathan C., "The Great Transition: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of rT ansitioning from Diesel Fuel Buses to Zero Emission Electric Buses for the NFTA in The Buffalo-Niagara Falls MSA" (2021). Applied Economics Theses. 44. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses/44 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses Part of the Public Economics Commons 1 The Great Transition: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitioning from Diesel-Fuel Buses to Zero Emission Electric Buses for the NFTA in the Buffalo-Niagara Falls MSA by Jonathan Meyers An Abstract of a Thesis In Applied Economics Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts December 2020 State University of New York College at Buffalo Department of Economics and Finance 2 Abstract The scope of this report is intended to help shape the future operations of the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority in a more economically and environmentally friendly way. In this report we analyze the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority’s (NFTA’s) current diesel bus fleet, with respect to zero emission electric buses available in the marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Procurement PARIS Report FYE 2016
    Procurement Report for Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Run Date: 06/16/2016 Fiscal Year Ending: 03/31/2016 Status: CERTIFIED Procurement-Information: Question Response URL (if applicable) 1. Does the Authority have procurement guidelines? Yes http://www.nfta.com/pdfs/ProcurementGuidelines.pdf 2. Are the procurement guidelines reviewed annually, amended if Yes needed, and approved by the Board? 3. Does the Authority allow for exceptions to the procurement No guidelines? 4. Does the Authority assign credit cards to employees for Yes travel and/or business purchases? 5. Does the Authority require prospective bidders to sign a Yes non-collusion agreement? 6. Does the Authority incorporate a summary of its procurement Yes policies and prohibitions in its solicitation of proposals, bid documents or specifications for procurement contracts?. 7. Did the Authority designate a person or persons to serve as Yes the authorized contact on a specific procurement, in accordance with Section 139-j(2)(a) of the State Finance Law, "The Procurement Lobbying Act"? 8. Did the Authority determine that a vendor had impermissible No contact during a procurement or attempted to influence the procurement during the reporting period, in accordance with Section 139-j(10) of the State Finance Law? If Yes, was a record made of this impermissible contact? 9. Does the Authority have a process to review and investigate Yes allegations of impermissible contact during a procurement, and to impose sanctions in instances where violations have occurred, in accordance with Section 139-j(9) of the State Finance Law? 10. As required by Section 2880 of the Public Authorities Law, Yes Attachment Included has the Authority prepared a statement on its prompt payment policy? 11.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 2: Applicability of Low-Floor Light Rail Vehicles In
    T RANSIT C OOPERATIVE R ESEARCH P ROGRAM SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Report 2 Applicability of Low-Floor Light Rail Vehicles in North America Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1995 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS WILLIAM W. MILLAR Port Authority of Allegheny County Chair: Lillian C. Borrone, Director, Port Authority, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Vice Chair: James W. VAN Loben Sels, Director, California Department of Transportation MEMBERS Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board SHARON D. BANKS AC Transit LEE BARNES MEMBERS Barwood, Inc. GERALD L. BLAIR EDWARD H. ARNOLD, Chair and President, Arnold Industries, Lebanon, PA Indiana County Transit Authority SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit, Oakland, CA MICHAEL BOLTON BRIAN J.L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor & Chair, Bruton Center for Development Studies, Capital Metro University of Texas at Dallas SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO DWIGHT M. BOWER, Director, Idaho Department of Transportation New Jersey Transit Corporation JOHN E. BREEN, The Nasser I. Al-Rashid Chair in Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin ROD DIRIDON DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, Washington, DC Santa Clara County Transit District A. RAY CHAMBERLAIN, Vice President, Freight Policy, American Trucking Associations, Inc., Alexandria, SANDRA DRAGGOO VA (Past Chair, 1993) CATA RAY W. CLOUGH, Nishkian Professor of Structural Engineering, Emeritus, University of California, Berkeley LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation SEPTA JAMES C. DELONG, Director of Aviation, Denver International Airport, Denver, CO DELON HAMPTON DENNIS J.
    [Show full text]