Chinch Bug in Warm Season Turfgrasses1 Eileen A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Field Notes in Support of a Revision of Hawaiian Carabidae
Field Notes in Support of a Revision of Hawaiian Carabidae James K. Liebherr* Cornell University Ithaca, NY, U.S.A. * Curator (Ret.) Cornell University Insect Collection, and Professor Emeritus 23 August 2021 Field Notes in Support of a Revision of Hawaiian Carabidae © 2021 by James K. Liebherr is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Cornell University Insect Collection John H. and Ann B. Comstock Hall Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853-2601 U.S.A. ii Table of Contents Foreword ……………………………………………………………….…………………………. iv 00.—Introduction …………………………………………………………………..………….. 1 01.—Kauaˋi; 9-22 March, 10-16 May 1991 ……..…………………………...….... 7 02.—Hawaiˋi Island; 23 March-5 April 1991 ..…………………………..…….… 21 03.—Haleakalā; 8-13 April 1991, 29 April–9 May 1991 …………….…….… 27 04.—Oˋahu; 20–23 April, 18 May 1991 ………………………..……….…..….…..41 05.—Molokaˋi; 24-27 April 1991 …………………………………….……..….………45 06.—West Maui, 11-15 May 1992; Molokaˋi, 15-16 May 1992 ...……… 50 07.—Maui Nui, 29 April-21 May 1993 (Lānaˋi, Molokaˋi, West Maui, Haleakalā) ……………….………………………………………………………………….…….61 08.—Oˋahu, 1-15 May 1995 .………………………………….……………………..…. 89 09.—Kauaˋi, 16-22 May 1995 ………………….………………..…………..………. 104 10.—Maui + Molokaˋi 20-31 May 1997 …..……………………………………... 114 11.—Hawaiˋi Island—1–6 June 1997 …..………………………..……………….. 134 12.—Hawaiˋi Island—9–17 October 1997 …..……………………….…….….. 138 13.—Haleakalā, Maui—30 April–15 May 1998 ….…………………………... 145 14.—Haleakalā and West Maui—15–23 May 2001 …….………….………. 167 15.—Hawaiˋi Island—23–27 May 2001 …………………..…………..…………. 179 16.—Haleakalā, Maui, 14–20 May 2003 …………………………………………. 184 17.—Hawaiˋi Island, 21–25 May 2003 ………………..………………………….. 192 18.—Lānaˋi, Molokaˋi, West Maui, 10–28 May 2004 …..……..….………. -
Studies of the Laboulbeniomycetes: Diversity, Evolution, and Patterns of Speciation
Studies of the Laboulbeniomycetes: Diversity, Evolution, and Patterns of Speciation The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:40049989 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA ! STUDIES OF THE LABOULBENIOMYCETES: DIVERSITY, EVOLUTION, AND PATTERNS OF SPECIATION A dissertation presented by DANNY HAELEWATERS to THE DEPARTMENT OF ORGANISMIC AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology HARVARD UNIVERSITY Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2018 ! ! © 2018 – Danny Haelewaters All rights reserved. ! ! Dissertation Advisor: Professor Donald H. Pfister Danny Haelewaters STUDIES OF THE LABOULBENIOMYCETES: DIVERSITY, EVOLUTION, AND PATTERNS OF SPECIATION ABSTRACT CHAPTER 1: Laboulbeniales is one of the most morphologically and ecologically distinct orders of Ascomycota. These microscopic fungi are characterized by an ectoparasitic lifestyle on arthropods, determinate growth, lack of asexual state, high species richness and intractability to culture. DNA extraction and PCR amplification have proven difficult for multiple reasons. DNA isolation techniques and commercially available kits are tested enabling efficient and rapid genetic analysis of Laboulbeniales fungi. Success rates for the different techniques on different taxa are presented and discussed in the light of difficulties with micromanipulation, preservation techniques and negative results. CHAPTER 2: The class Laboulbeniomycetes comprises biotrophic parasites associated with arthropods and fungi. -
Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of
HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance of Arthropods in Residential Turfgrass 1 S. V. JOSEPH AND S. K. BRAMAN Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, GrifÞn, GA 30223-1797 J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1116Ð1122 (2009) ABSTRACT The effect of taxa [common Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.); centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack; St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze; and zoysiagrass, Zoysia spp.], density, height, and weed density on abundance of natural enemies, and their potential prey were evaluated in residential turf. Total predatory Heteroptera were most abundant in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass and included Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae, Geocoridae, and Miridae. Anthocoridae and Lasiochilidae were most common in St. Augustinegrass, and their abundance correlated positively with species of Blissidae and Delphacidae. Chinch bugs were present in all turf taxa, but were 23Ð47 times more abundant in St. Augustinegrass. Anthocorids/lasiochilids were more numerous on taller grasses, as were Blissidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae, and Cercopidae. Geocoridae and Miridae were most common in zoysiagrass and were collected in higher numbers with increasing weed density. However, no predatory Heteroptera were affected by grass density. Other beneÞcial insects such as staphylinids and parasitic Hymenoptera were captured most often in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass. These differences in abundance could be in response to primary or alternate prey, or reßect the inßuence of turf microenvironmental characteristics. In this study, SimpsonÕs diversity index for predatory Heteroptera showed the greatest diversity and evenness in centipedegrass, whereas the herbivores and detritivores were most diverse in St. Augustinegrass lawns. These results demonstrate the complex role of plant taxa in structuring arthropod communities in turf. -
Insects in Kansas Book: 2016 Revised Taxonomy
Insects in Kansas Book: 2016 Revised Taxonomy TAXONOMIC CHANGES TO INSECT ORDERS 1. Order Collembola, Springtails, are no longer classified as insects (pg. 38‐39) but were elevated to Class status 2. Order Thysanura, Bristletails and Silverfish are now split into their own Orders and Thysanura no longer exists as an Order name. a. Bristletails=Order Microcoryphia (pg. 40‐41) b. Silverfish=Order Zygentoma (pg. 40‐41) 3. Order Phasmatodea, walkingsticks, are sometimes referred to as Phasmida (pg. 55) 4. Order Blattodea now includes both cockroaches and termites (Order Isoptera is now a suborder) (pg. 84‐85) 5. Order Pscoptera, barklice, are now called Psocodea(pg. 86) 6. Orders Mallophaga and Anoplura (pg. 87‐92) are now in Psocodea as suborders 7. Order Hemiptera now includes the Order Homoptera (Homoptera is now a suborder) (pg. 121‐ 418) 8. Order Neuroptera now includes lacewings, owlflies, and antlions but NOT dobsonflies (see #9) (pg. 153‐159) 9. Order Megaloptera now includes dobsonflies, alderflies, and fishflies (pg. 153‐159) TAXONOMIC CHANGES TO INSECT FAMILIES 1. Cave and camel crickets are now in the Family Rhapidophoridae not Gryllacrididae (pg. 73) 2. Ant crickets have been put into their own Family now called Myrmecophilidae (pg. 74‐75) 3. Red‐legged Earwigs are now in the Family Anisolabididae (pg. 78) 4. German and wood cockroaches are now in the Family Ectobiidae, F. Blattellidae is no longer valid (pg. 82‐83) 5. Family Liposcelidae is now called Liposcelididae (pg. 86) 6. Pubic lice are now in their own Family Phthiridae (pg. 92) 7. Family Pentatomidae no longer includes the Shield bugs or shield‐backed bugs (pg. -
Synopsis of the Heteroptera Or True Bugs of the Galapagos Islands
Synopsis of the Heteroptera or True Bugs of the Galapagos Islands ' 4k. RICHARD C. JROESCHNE,RD SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 407 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review. -
Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae)
2018 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 58(1): 207–226 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0018 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Annotated catalogue of the fl ower bugs from India (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae) Chandish R. BALLAL1), Shahid Ali AKBAR2,*), Kazutaka YAMADA3), Aijaz Ahmad WACHKOO4) & Richa VARSHNEY1) 1) National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, India; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Srinagar, 190007 India; e-mail: [email protected] 3) Tokushima Prefectural Museum, Bunka-no-Mori Park, Mukoterayama, Hachiman-cho, Tokushima, 770–8070 Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 4) Department of Zoology, Government Degree College, Shopian, Jammu and Kashmir, 192303 India; e-mail: [email protected] *) Corresponding author Accepted: Abstract. The present paper provides a checklist of the fl ower bug families Anthocoridae th 6 June 2018 and Lasiochilidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of India based on literature and newly collected Published online: specimens including eleven new records. The Indian fauna of fl ower bugs is represented by 73 5th July 2018 species belonging to 26 genera under eight tribes of two families. Generic transfers of Blap- tostethus pluto (Distant, 1910) comb. nov. (from Triphleps pluto Distant, 1910) and Dilasia indica (Muraleedharan, 1978) comb. nov. (from Lasiochilus indica Muraleedharan, 1978) are provided. A lectotype is designated for Blaptostethus pluto. Previous, as well as new, distribu- -
Insect Classification Standards 2020
RECOMMENDED INSECT CLASSIFICATION FOR UGA ENTOMOLOGY CLASSES (2020) In an effort to standardize the hexapod classification systems being taught to our students by our faculty in multiple courses across three UGA campuses, I recommend that the Entomology Department adopts the basic system presented in the following textbook: Triplehorn, C.A. and N.F. Johnson. 2005. Borror and DeLong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects. 7th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont CA, 864 pp. This book was chosen for a variety of reasons. It is widely used in the U.S. as the textbook for Insect Taxonomy classes, including our class at UGA. It focuses on North American taxa. The authors were cautious, presenting changes only after they have been widely accepted by the taxonomic community. Below is an annotated summary of the T&J (2005) classification. Some of the more familiar taxa above the ordinal level are given in caps. Some of the more important and familiar suborders and families are indented and listed beneath each order. Note that this is neither an exhaustive nor representative list of suborders and families. It was provided simply to clarify which taxa are impacted by some of more important classification changes. Please consult T&J (2005) for information about taxa that are not listed below. Unfortunately, T&J (2005) is now badly outdated with respect to some significant classification changes. Therefore, in the classification standard provided below, some well corroborated and broadly accepted updates have been made to their classification scheme. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this classification. -
Insectts Intestinal Organ for Symbiont Sorting
Insect’s intestinal organ for symbiont sorting PNAS PLUS Tsubasa Ohbayashia, Kazutaka Takeshitaa,b, Wataru Kitagawaa,b, Naruo Nikohc, Ryuichi Kogad, Xian-Ying Mengd, Kanako Tagoe, Tomoyuki Horif, Masahito Hayatsue, Kozo Asanoa, Yoichi Kamagataa,b, Bok Luel Leeg, Takema Fukatsud, and Yoshitomo Kikuchia,b,1 aGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan; bBioproduction Research Institute, Hokkaido Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan; cDepartment of Liberal Arts, The Open University of Japan, Chiba 261-8586, Japan; dBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8566, Japan; eEnvironmental Biofunction Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba 305-8604, Japan; fEnvironmental Management Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8569, Japan; and gGlobal Research Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735, Korea Edited by Nancy A. Moran, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved August 11, 2015 (received for review June 11, 2015) Symbiosis has significantly contributed to organismal adaptation Those controlling mechanisms are of general importance for and diversification. For establishment and maintenance of such host– understanding symbiosis (6, 10). symbiont associations, host organisms must have evolved mecha- Stinkbugs, belonging to the insect order Hemiptera, consist of nisms for selective incorporation, accommodation, and maintenance over 40,000 described species in the world (15). The majority of of their specific microbial partners. Here we report the discovery of a the stinkbugs suck plant sap or tissues, and some of them are previously unrecognized type of animal organ for symbiont sorting. -
Great Lakes Entomologist the Grea T Lakes E N Omo L O G Is T Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Vol
The Great Lakes Entomologist THE GREA Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Vol. 45, Nos. 3 & 4 Fall/Winter 2012 Volume 45 Nos. 3 & 4 ISSN 0090-0222 T LAKES Table of Contents THE Scholar, Teacher, and Mentor: A Tribute to Dr. J. E. McPherson ..............................................i E N GREAT LAKES Dr. J. E. McPherson, Educator and Researcher Extraordinaire: Biographical Sketch and T List of Publications OMO Thomas J. Henry ..................................................................................................111 J.E. McPherson – A Career of Exemplary Service and Contributions to the Entomological ENTOMOLOGIST Society of America L O George G. Kennedy .............................................................................................124 G Mcphersonarcys, a New Genus for Pentatoma aequalis Say (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) IS Donald B. Thomas ................................................................................................127 T The Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) of Missouri Robert W. Sites, Kristin B. Simpson, and Diane L. Wood ............................................134 Tymbal Morphology and Co-occurrence of Spartina Sap-feeding Insects (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) Stephen W. Wilson ...............................................................................................164 Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Scutelleridae) Associated with the Dioecious Shrub Florida Rosemary, Ceratiola ericoides (Ericaceae) A. G. Wheeler, Jr. .................................................................................................183 -
Cupulomyces, a New Genus of Laboulbeniales (Asomycetes) Based on Stigmatomyces Lasiochili Richard K
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 13 | Issue 2 Article 7 1992 Cupulomyces, A New Genus of Laboulbeniales (Asomycetes) Based on Stigmatomyces Lasiochili Richard K. Benjamin Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Benjamin, Richard K. (1992) "Cupulomyces, A New Genus of Laboulbeniales (Asomycetes) Based on Stigmatomyces Lasiochili," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 13: Iss. 2, Article 7. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol13/iss2/7 ALISO 13(2), 1992, pp. 355-364 CUPULOMYCES, A NEW GENUS OF LABOULBENIALES (ASCOMYCETES) BASED ON STIGMATOMYCES LASIOCHILI RICHARD K. BENJAMIN Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Claremont, California 91711 ABSTRACT A new genus of Laboulbeniales, Cupulomyces, is described. Its type species, C. lasiochili, is based on Stigmatomyces lasiochili, originally described by Roland Thaxter in I 917. This taxon subsequently has been classified in two other genera, H esperomyces and Acompsomyces. Structure and development of the thallus of C. lasiochili are described and illustrated with photographs and line drawings. Dis tinctive features of the receptacle, appendage, and perithecium warrant recognition of a new genus. Key words: Acompsomyces, Ascomycetes, Cupulomyces, fungi, Hesperomyces, Heteroptera, insect parasites, Laboulbeniales, morphology, Stigmatomyces, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION Stigmatomyces lasiochili Thaxter was found on a terrestrial bug, Lasiochilus pal/idulus Reut. (order: Heteroptera; suborder: Cimicomorpha; superfamily: Ci micoidea; family: Anthocoridae [Henry 1988]), collected in Grenada, West Indies (Thaxter 191 7). This fungus is one of the relatively few Laboulbeniales known on Heteroptera (see summary in Benjamin [1986]) and the only one that has been found on a member of the Anthocoridae. -
Vol. 14, No. 1 Spring 1981 the GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 14 No
The GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 14, No. 1 Spring 1981 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 14 No. 1 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS Annotated List of Indiana Scolytidae (Coleoptera) Mark Deyrup .................................................. Seasonal Flight Patterns of Hemiptera in a North Carolina Black Walnut Plantation. 2. Coreoida J. E. McPherson and B. C. Weber .......................................... 11 Seasonal Flight Patterns of Hemiptera in a North Carolina Black Walnut Plantation. 3. Reduvioidea J. E. McPherson and B. C. Weber .......................................... 15 Seasonal Flight Patterns of Hemiptera in a North Carolina Black Walnut Plantation. 4. Cimicoidea J. E. McPherson and B. C. Weber .......................................... 19 Fourlined Plant Bug (Hemiptera: Miridae), A Reappraisal: Life History, Host Plants, and Plant Response to Feeding A. G. Wheeler, Jr. and Gary L. Miller.. ..................................... 23 Hawthorn Lace Bug (Hemiptera: Tingidae), First Record of Injury to Roses, with a Review of Host Plants A. G. Wheeler, Jr. ........................................................ 37 Notes on the Biology of Nersia florens (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea: Dictyopharidae) with Descriptions of Eggs, and First, Second, and Fifth Instars S. W. Wilson and J. E. McPherson.. ...................... Ontogeny of the Tibial Spur in Megamelus davisi (Homoptera: Delphacidae) and its Bearing on Delphacid Classification S. W. Wilson and J. E. McPherson.. ..................... -
S131A Insects in Kansas 2016 Revised Taxonomy
Insects in Kansas 2016 Revised Taxonomy Taxonomic Changes to Insect Orders 9. Chinch bugs are now in the family Blissidae. (102) 1. Order Collembola, springtails, are no longer classified as 10. Big-eyed bugs are now in the family Geocoridae. (103) insects (38-39) but were elevated to class status. 11. Long-necked seed bugs are in the family 2. Order Thysanura, bristletails and silverfish are now in Rhyparochromidae. (103) different orders. Thysanura is no longer an order name. 12. The ambush bug is now in the family Reduviidae. (107) a. Bristletails=Order Microcoryphia (40-41) 13. Tiger beetles are in the family Carabidae. (160-164) b. Silverfish=Order Zygentoma (40-41) 14. Skin beetles are now in the family Trogidae. (181) 3. Order Phasmatodea, walkingsticks, are sometimes referred to as Phasmida (55) 15. Family Trogositidae is now Trogossitidae. (201) 4. Order Blattodea now includes both cockroaches and 16. Lizard beetles are now in the family Erotylidae. (206) termites. Order Isoptera is now a suborder. (84-85) 17. Seed beetles are now in the family Chrysomelidae. (239) 5. Order Pscoptera, barklice, are now called Psocodea (86) 18. Bark beetles are now in the family Curculionidae. (240- 6. Orders Mallophaga and Anoplura (87-92) are now in 241) Psocodea as suborders. 19. Thief weevils are now in the family Attelabidae. (242) 7. Order Hemiptera now includes the Order Homoptera. 20. Aphid parasite is now in the family Braconidae. (257) Homoptera is now a suborder. (121-148) 21. Genus Myzinum is now in the family Thynnidae. (263) 8. Order Neuroptera now includes lacewings, owlflies, and 22.