[Palaeontology, 2017, pp. 1–22] COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL TAPHONOMY OF EIGHT MARINE ARTHROPODS INDICATES DISTINCT DIFFERENCES IN PRESERVATION POTENTIAL by ADIEL€ A. KLOMPMAKER1,2 , ROGER W. PORTELL1 and MICHAEL G. FRICK3 1Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, PO Box 117800, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA;
[email protected] 2Department of Integrative Biology & Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, 1005 Valley Life Sciences Building #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research & Department of Biology, University of Florida, PO Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Typescript received 9 January 2017; accepted in revised form 30 May 2017 Abstract: Global biodiversity patterns in deep time can We found limited variation in the decay rate between con- only be understood fully when the relative preservation specifics, and we did not observe size-related trends in potential of each clade is known. The relative preservation decay rate. Conversely, substantial differences in the decay potential of marine arthropod clades, a diverse and ecologi- rate between species were seen after c. 50 days, with cally important component of modern and past ecosystems, shrimps and stomatopods decaying fastest, suggesting a rel- is poorly known. We tackled this issue by carrying out a atively low preservation potential, whereas the lobster, cal- 205-day long comprehensive, comparative, taphonomic ico crabs, horseshoe crabs and barnacles showed relatively experiment in a laboratory by scoring up to ten tapho- slow decay rates, suggesting a higher preservation potential. nomic characters for multiple specimens of seven crus- These results are supported by two modern and fossil tacean and one chelicerate species (two true crabs, one record-based preservation potential metrics that are signifi- shrimp, one lobster, one hermit crab, one stomatopod, one cantly correlated to decay rate ranks.