WADDEN SEA (Extension of the “Wadden Sea”, Germany / Netherlands)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WADDEN SEA (Extension of the “Wadden Sea”, Germany / Netherlands) EUROPE / NORTH AMERICA WADDEN SEA (Extension of the “Wadden Sea”, Germany / Netherlands) DENMARK / GERMANY Denmark / Germany – Wadden Sea WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION WADDEN SEA (DENMARK / GERMANY) – ID No. 1314 Ter IUCN RECOMMENDATION TO WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: To approve the extension under natural criteria. Key paragraphs of Operational Guidelines: Paragraph 77: Nominated property meets World Heritage criteria. Paragraph 78: Nominated property meets integrity or protection and management requirements. Background note: In 1988 Germany nominated the mudflats of the Wadden Sea in Lower Saxony for World Heritage inscription. The Committee, at its 13th Session (Paris, 1989), recommended that the nomination of this property be deferred until a fully revised nomination of the Wadden Sea was submitted jointly by Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. In 2008 Germany and the Netherlands resubmitted a joint nomination and the Committee, at its 33rd Session (Seville, 2009), inscribed the Wadden Sea (Germany/Netherlands), on the World Heritage List under natural criteria (viii), (ix) and (x) (decision 33 COM 8B.4), covering an area of 968,393 ha. In 2010 Germany and the Netherlands submitted a Minor Boundary Modification to include the Hamburg Wadden Sea National Park (13,611 ha) which was approved by the Committee at its 35th Session (Paris, 2011, decision 35COM 8B.47). Thus the property now covers an area of 982,004 ha. The Committee, at its 33rd Session (Seville, 2009) and at its 35th Session (Paris, 2011) encouraged the States Parties of Germany and the Netherlands to work with the State Party of Denmark and consider the potential for nominating an extension of the property to include the Danish Wadden Sea. A range of additional recommendations were also made regarding the property, and the relevant decisions are 33 COM 8B.4 and 35COM 8B.47. In response to the World Heritage Committee’s recommendations, the State Parties of Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark submitted in January 2013 a nomination to extend the Wadden Sea World Heritage property (968,393ha), to include most of the Danish Wadden Sea Conservation Area, and a further area offshore of the German Wadden Sea in Lower Saxony. 1. DOCUMENTATION Wadden Sea, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Goeldner, L. (1999). The German Wadden Sea coast: reclamation a) Date nomination received by IUCN: 20 March 2013 and environmental protection. Journal of Coastal Conservation 5:23-30. Hötker, H., Schrader, S., b) Additional information officially requested from Schwemmer, P., Oberdiek, N., and Blew, J. (2010). and provided by the State Party: Following the Status, threats and conservation of birds in the technical evaluation mission the State Party was German Wadden Sea. Technical Report NABU. JMBB requested to provide supplementary information on 13 (2013). Breeding Birds in Trouble: Preparation of an December 2013. The information was received on 26 action plan for proper management of threatened February 2014. breeding birds in the Wadden Sea. Joint Monitoring Breeding Bird Group Workshop Report, Wilhelmshaven. c) Additional literature consulted: Christensen, S. M. Kempf, N., and Kleefstra, R. (2013). Moulting Shelduck (2008). Case study 5 - Wadden Sea National Park in the Wadden Sea 2010 – 2012: Evaluation of three Pilot, Denmark. Scottish Natural Heritage Research, years of counts and recommendations for future Annex to Commissioned Report No. 271. Christensen, monitoring. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, S. M. (2008). Case study 4 - Wadden Sea National Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group and Joint Park - Schleswig- Holstein Area, Germany. Scottish Monitoring Group of Migratory Birds in the Wadden. Natural Heritage Research, Annex to Commissioned Kröncke, I., Zeiss, B., and Rensing, C. (2001). Long- Report No. 271. Dettmann, C., and Enemark, J. (2009). term variability in macrofauna species composition The Wadden Sea wetlands: A multi-jurisdictional off the island of Norderney (East Frisia, Germany) in challenge. In Sustaining the world’s wetlands, ed. R.C. relation to changes in climatic and environmental Smardon, 21–56. Springer Science, New York. Ens, B. condition. Senckenbergiana Maritima 31: 65–82. J., Blew, J., van Roomen, M.W.J., and Turnhout van, Kröncke, I., Reiss, H., and Dippner, J.W. (2013). Effects C.A.M. (2009). Exploring contrasting trends of of cold winters and regime shifts on macrofauna migratory waterbirds in the Wadden Sea. Wadden communities in the southern North Sea. Estuarine, Sea Ecosystem No. 27. Common Wadden Sea Coastal and Shelf Science 119: 79-90. Laursen, K., Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Hounisen, J.P., Rasmussen, L.M., Frikke, J., Pihl, S., Group, Joint Monitoring Group of Migratory Birds in the Kahlert, J., Bak, M., and Amstrup, O. (2009). Rastende IUCN Evaluation Report – April 2014 43 Denmark / Germany – Wadden Sea vandfugle i Margrethe Kog og på forlandet vest for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation; the Tøndermarsken, 1984-2007. Danmarks Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation, Miljøundersøgelser, Aarhus Universitet. 78 s. – Faglig Regional Policy Department North; Mayors of the rapport fra DMU nr. 702. Laursen, K., Blew, J., Tønder, Esbjerg, and Fanø Municipalities; Ornithological Eskildsen, K., Günther, K., Hälterlein, B., Kleefstra, R., Society; Hunters Association; Agricultural Society; Lüerssen, G., Potel, P., and Schrader, S. (2010). Military Commander; and many other stakeholders. Migratory Waterbirds in the Wadden Sea 1987- 2008. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No.30. Common Wadden Sea e) Field Visit: Dr Wendy Strahm and Dr Oliver Secretariat, Joint Monitoring Group of Migratory Birds in Avramoski, 19-23 August 2013 the Wadden Sea, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Laursen, K., Kristensen, P.S., and Clausen, P. (2010). f) Date of IUCN approval of this report: March 2014 Assessment of blue mussel Mytilus edulis fisheries and waterbird shellfish-predator management in the Danish Wadden Sea. Ambio 39: 476-485. Lotze, H. K., 2. SUMMARY OF NATURAL VALUES Reise, K, Worm, B, van Beusekom, J. E. E., Busch, M., Ehlers, A., Heinrich, D., Hoffmann, R. C., Holm, P., The Wadden Sea, which covers the intertidal zone in the Jensen, C., Knottnerus, O. S., Langhanki, N., Prummel, south-eastern part of the North Sea, is considered to W., Vollmer, M., and Wolff, W. J. (2005). Human represent the largest unbroken system of tidal sand and transformations of the Wadden Sea ecosystem mud flats worldwide with natural dynamic processes through time: a synthesis. Helgoland Marine proceeding in a widely unimpaired natural state. The Research, 59, 84-95. Marencic, H. (Ed.), 2009. The proposed extension encompasses and complements all Wadden Sea - Introduction. Thematic Report No. 1. In: the biophysical and ecosystem processes that Marencic, H. & Vlas, J. de (Eds), 2009. Quality Status characterise the Wadden Sea. It includes most of the Report 2009. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 25. Common Danish Wadden Sea Conservation Area (DWSCA; Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and 121,616 ha) at the most northern part of the Wadden Assessment Group, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Sea, and an offshore extension of the Lower Saxony Rasmussen, L. M. (2008). The Danish Wadden Sea as Wadden Sea National Park, Germany (WSNPLS; 40,628 Breeding Ground and Crossroad for Birds. Dansk ha). The location and size of both the inscribed and Ornitologisk Forening, BirdLife Denmark. Reise, K., nominated component parts of the property were Baptist, M., Burbridge, P., Dankers, N., Fischer, L., provided in the nomination dossier (table 1). The total Flemming, B., Oost, A.P. and Smit, C. (2010). The area of the property if the proposed extension is Wadden Sea – a universally outstanding tidal approved will amount to 1,143,403 ha. No buffer zone to wetland. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 29. Common the nominated property is proposed. Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Pp. 7-24. van Roomen, M., Laursen, K., van Turnhout, C., The DWSCA was designated by Statutory Order on the van Winden, E., Blewc, J., Eskildsen, K., Günther, K., Nature and Wildlife Reserve Wadden Sea, 1982 and its Hälterlein, B., Kleefstra, R., Potel, P., Schrader, S., later amendments. The boundaries of this area are Luerssen, G., and Ens, B. J. (2012). Signals from the mostly delimited by man-made dikes along the mainland Wadden sea: Population declines dominate among coast and surrounding the three inhabited islands of waterbirds depending on intertidal mudflats. Ocean Rømø, Mandø and Fanø, with one small area inland of & Coastal Management 68: 79-88. Toonen, T. A. J. the dikes included (most of the artificially managed (2009). Good Governance for the Wadden: The wetland of Margrethe Kog which was reclaimed in 1982). organisation of decision-making for sustainability. In the few areas that are not diked, the area is delimited Paper written for presentation at the Workshop in by the highest daily water level including the high sands. Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University Offshore the nominated property is delimited by the 3 (IU) Bloomington (IN), USA, June 3-6. Wolff, W.J., nautical sea mile boundary. The state boundary between Bakker, J.P., Laursen, K. and Reise, K. (2010). The Denmark and Germany constitutes the southern Wadden Sea Quality Status Report—Synthesis boundary of the proposed extension. In the north, the Report 2010. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 29. Common proposed extension includes the peninsula of Skallingen Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Pp. and the Ho Bay. Some of the state-owned parts of the 25-74. WWF (1991). The Common Future of the islands such as the beaches of Rømø are included in the Wadden Sea. World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF- nomination. The proposed extension does not include Wattenmeerstelle, Husun, Germany. the shipping lane to Esbjerg, the military exercise area on the island of Rømø, a small area around the Rømø d) Consultations: 7 desk reviews received. The mission harbour (as there are plans to enlarge the harbour) and also met with representatives from the Nature Agency, a small area in the northern part of the Margrethe Kog Denmark; from the Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, reclamation area.
Recommended publications
  • Status of the Baltic/Wadden Sea Population of the Common Eider Somateria M
    Baltic/Wadden Sea Common Eider 167 Status of the Baltic/Wadden Sea population of the Common Eider Somateria m. mollissima M. Desholm1, T.K. Christensen1, G. Scheiffarth2, M. Hario3, Å. Andersson4, B. Ens5, C.J. Camphuysen6, L. Nilsson7, C.M. Waltho8, S-H. Lorentsen9, A. Kuresoo10, R.K.H. Kats5,11, D.M. Fleet12 & A.D. Fox1 1Department of Coastal Zone Ecology, National Environmental Research Institute, Grenåvej 12, 8410 Rønde, Denmark. Email: [email protected]/[email protected]/[email protected] 2Institut für Vogelforschung, ‘Vogelwarte Helgoland’, An der Vogelwarte 21, D - 26386 Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Email: [email protected] 3Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Söderskär Game Research Station. P.O.Box 6, FIN-00721 Helsinki, Finland. Email: [email protected] 4Ringgatan 39 C, S-752 17 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected] 5Alterra, P.O. Box 167, 1790 AD Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands. Email:[email protected]/[email protected] 6Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (Royal NIOZ), P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] 7Department of Animal Ecology, University of Lund, Ecology Building, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected] 873 Stewart Street, Carluke, Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK, ML8 5BY. Email: [email protected] 9Norwegian Institute for Nature Research. Tungasletta 2, N-7485 Trondheim, Norway Email: [email protected] 10Institute of Zoology and Botany, Riia St. 181, 51014, Tartu, Estonia. Email: [email protected] 11Department of Animal Ecology, University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NH, Groningen, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Wadden Sea Ecosystem
    The Ecosystem Approach of the Convention on Biological Diversity German Case Study on the lessons learned from the project “Ecosystem Research Wadden Sea” Report By commission of the Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin Grant no. 363 01 024 Author: Rolf Oeschger English translation: Matthias Seaman December 2000 Publisher: Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt) Bismarckplatz 1 14193 Berlin Germany Tel.: ++49.30.8903-0 Fax: ++49.30.8903-2285 Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de Edited by: Section II 1.1 Birgit Georgi Gabriele Wollenburg Cover design: Birgit Georgi Thilo Mages-Dellè Berlin, December 2000 2 Summary It has increasingly become accepted in recent years that ecosystems can only be managed sensibly if they are perceived and protected in their entirety. To this end, 12 principles for an ecosystem approach and 5 points of operational guidance have been elaborated in the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity. They have not been applied to a marine ecosystem as yet. The “Ecosystem Research Wadden Sea” of 1989-1999 provides an appropriate case study for the practicality of these principles, because its integrative approach largely corresponds to the ecosystem approach. Principle 1: The objectives of management of land, water and living resources are a matter of societal choice Intensive publicity is an insufficient foundation for implementing management actions in a national park. Stakeholders whose economic interests are affected must be invol- ved in the preparation of the management concept at an early stage (e.g. by the formation of working groups), particularly since the implementation of precise measures often requires the stakeholders’ practical experience. When dealing with controversial and complex topics, it is advisable to employ independent mediators capable of formulating proposals to reconcile diverging interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Particularly Sensitive Seas Areas (Pssas)
    Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas Recommendation WWF calls on the Environment Ministers of the Baltic Organization (IMO) to the need for action. In addition, and North-East Atlantic to agree to take concerted action the Contracting Parties should work co-operatively within the framework of the International Maritime within the IMO to achieve an appropriate response, Organization (IMO) to promote the Baltic Sea, including action at a regional or local level. In a the Barents Sea and the waters of Western Europe*, comparable but more specific way, Article 8 of the 1992 as Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSA) Helsinki Convention, in conjunction with its Annex IV, along with appropriate protective measures. provides the basis for Baltic states to work * co-operatively at regional level and within the The waters of Portugal, Spain including the waters to the Straits of IMO to prevent pollution from shipping. Gibraltar, France, and to the west and east of Ireland and the UK, including the Irish Sea and relevant parts of the North Sea. Background Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs) are areas of the seas and oceans that need special protection through briefing action by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) because of their ecological, economic, cultural or scientific significance and their vulnerability to harmful Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas impacts from shipping activities. To date 5 PSSAs have PSSAs can benefit valuable ecosystems such as coral been designated globally and the 6th off the coast of reefs, intertidal wetlands and important marine and Peru is in the pipeline. The most recently designated coastal habitats. They are also important for migrating site, the Wadden Sea, is the first PSSA in European seabirds, dolphins, seals or other marine species, as well waters.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Beach Nature Explained
    BOOK REVIEWS land disappeared under water, including viewing it as an indifferently designed work On the beach the legendary Rungholt, east of the of other purpose. The author's skills lie in present island of Pellworm. A second Donald J.P. Swift the collecting and ordering of information. Mandrdnke occurred on 11 October, Chapters that attempt to take an overview, 1694. But the main and partially enduring such as those on natural preconditions and The Morphodynamlcs of the Wadden land losses, resulting in the formation of barrier-island development, are not Sea. By Jurgen Ehlers. A.A. Balkema: Jade Bay, the Dollart and the Zuider Zee, altogether successful, although they are 1988. Pp.397. DM 185, £52. 75. did not occur as the result of single events, always interesting. On the other hand, the but gradually, through many smaller relentless procession of maps, aerial THE Wadden Sea is the intertidal zone of stages. These land losses were due to a photographs and, above all, photograph the German Bight of the North Sea. lack of technical infrastructure capable of after photograph at ground level, has a Varying in width from 10 to 50 km, it is an protecting the vast forelands from the hypnotic effect. Somewhere through the expanse of tidal channels, flats, inlets, destructive effects of later surges in later 393 figures, these vistas of misty dunes, flood and ebb deltas, barrier islands and decades. Land reclamation occurred, but beaches and marshes, and of tidal flats estuaries that extends from Den Helder only through projects that lasted for extending to the horizon, seep into the in the Netherlands to Blavandshuk in centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Heritage of the Wadden Sea
    The Cultural Heritage of the Wadden Sea 1. Overview Name: Wadden Sea Delimitation: Between the Zeegat van Texel (i.e. Marsdiep, 52° 59´N, 4° 44´E) in the west, and Blåvands Huk in the north-east. On its seaward side it is bordered by the West, East and North Frisian Islands, the Danish Islands of Fanø, Rømø and Mandø and the North Sea. Its landward border is formed by embankments along the Dutch provinces of North- Holland, Friesland and Groningen, the German state of Lower Saxony and southern Denmark and Schleswig-Holstein. Size: Approx. 12,500 square km. Location-map: Borders from west to east the southern mainland-shore of the North Sea in Western Europe. Origin of name: ‘Wad’, ‘watt’ or ‘vad’ meaning a ford or shallow place. This is presumably derives from the fact that it is possible to cross by foot large areas of this sea during the ebb-tides (comparable to Latin vadum, vado, a fordable sea or lake). Relationship/similarities with other cultural entities: Has a direct relationship with the Frisian Islands and the western Danish islands and the coast of the Netherlands, Lower Saxony, Schleswig-Holstein and south Denmark. Characteristic elements and ensembles: The Wadden Sea is a tidal-flat area and as such the largest of its kind in Europe. A tidal-flat area is a relatively wide area (for the most part separated from the open sea – North Sea ̶ by a chain of barrier- islands, the Frisian Islands) which is for the greater part covered by seawater at high tides but uncovered at low tides.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural History of the Wadden Sea
    A natural history of the Wadden Sea Riddled by contingencies Karsten Reise People who are always praising the past And especially the times of faith as best Ought to go back to the middle ages and be burned at the stake as witches and sages. Stevie Smith (1902-1971) Contents 4 Preface by Jens Enemark 50 Chapter 5 Beginning of a new wadden alliance? 6 Contents in a clamshell. A few preliminary comments by the author 60 Chapter 6 How natural is wadden nature? 7 Introduction 70 Chapter 7 What does the future hold 10 Chapter 1 for the Wadden Sea? Why natural history? 80 Conclusions and 22 Chapter 2 recommendations Contingency in natural history What is contingency? 84 The Author / Acknowledgements 34 Chapter 3 On the origin of the Wadden Sea 86 Endnotes 42 Chapter 4 Invited to drown 88 Bibliography Hoofdstuk Preface It is a privilege to write the preface of this booklet by Karsten Contingency is a central notion in Reise’s work and vision. Reise A natural history of the Wadden Sea. Riddled by contingencies. It refers to space­and­time coincidences and accidental events. It is the fourth booklet in a series that is being published to mark Contingency is almost always involved in natural patterns. The the occasion of the special lectures being held at the symposia natural history of the Wadden Sea displays such contingencies. organised by the Wadden Academy. It cannot be understood as a self­sustaining and resilient system with an inbuilt capability to find a natural balance. Attention to Karsten Reise delivered the keynote address entitled ‘Turning contingency will strengthen realism and promote prudence tides: A natural history of the Wadden Sea’ at the 13th Inter­ when it comes to projections for the future, Karsten Reise argues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wadden Sea Forum: the Relevance of Stakeholder Participation for Sustainable Planning
    Sustainable Development and Planning II, Vol. 2 1291 The Wadden Sea Forum: the relevance of stakeholder participation for sustainable planning F. De Jong Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Germany Abstract The Wadden Sea is Europe’s largest marine wetland area, bordering the North Sea coasts of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Because of the international importance of the Wadden Sea as a nature area, large parts are protected under national and international laws and associated management schemes. Since 1978 the trilateral cooperation between Denmark, Germany and The Netherlands on the protection of the Wadden Sea has been dealing with the joint protection of the Wadden Sea ecosystem. In the course of the 25 years of cooperation several central elements of integrated management have been agreed upon. It concerns common objectives, a common delimitation and a common management plan for the area. What was still lacking was a structure for public participation. It was felt by the commercial sectors in the area that there was an imbalance between nature protection and social and economic development of the region and that nature protection rules and regulations would hamper socio-economic developments. With the installation in 2002 of an independent platform, the Wadden Sea Region stakeholders were given a better opportunity to present their views on the future of the Region, taking account of ecological, social and economic aspects, in other words, a sustainable development perspective for the Wadden Sea Region. In a three-year period of intensive discussions and negotiations a common approach to sustainable development of the Wadden Sea Region, focusing on the period 2005–2020, has been developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Status, Threats and Conservation of Birds in the German Wadden Sea
    Status, threats and conservation of birds in the German Wadden Sea Technical Report Impressum – Legal notice © 2010, NABU-Bundesverband Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) e.V. www.NABU.de Charitéstraße 3 D-10117 Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30.28 49 84-0 Fax +49 (0)30.28 49 84-20 00 [email protected] Text: Hermann Hötker, Stefan Schrader, Phillip Schwemmer, Nadine Oberdiek, Jan Blew Language editing: Richard Evans, Solveigh Lass-Evans Edited by: Stefan Schrader, Melanie Ossenkop Design: Christine Kuchem (www.ck-grafik-design.de) Printed by: Druckhaus Berlin-Mitte, Berlin, Germany EMAS certified, printed on 100 % recycled paper, certified environmentally friendly under the German „Blue Angel“ scheme. First edition 03/2010 Available from: NABU Natur Shop, Am Eisenwerk 13, 30519 Hannover, Germany, Tel. +49 (0)5 11.2 15 71 11, Fax +49 (0)5 11.1 23 83 14, [email protected] or at www.NABU.de/Shop Cost: 2.50 Euro per copy plus postage and packing payable by invoice. Item number 5215 Picture credits: Cover picture: M. Stock; small pictures from left to right: F. Derer, S. Schrader, M. Schäf. Status, threats and conservation of birds in the German Wadden Sea 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Technical Report 2 The German Wadden Sea as habitat for birds .......................................................................... 5 2.1 General description of the German Wadden Sea area .....................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Change of Mean Tidal Peaks and Range Due to Estuarine Waterway Deepening
    Change of mean tidal peaks and range due to estuarine waterway deepening Hanz D. Niemeyer1 Abstract: The deepening of estuarine waterways enforces essential changes of mean tidal water level peaks and range. Legal requirements ask for their determination by preservation of evidence. A method has been established to evaluate these effects quantitatively by statistical tools for each measure, even in the case of subsequent deepenings. Intruction Deepening of estuarine waterways enforce there changes of tidal water levels. They start immediately after deepening but continue after execution of dredging for a certain per- iod of time being necessary for the development of a new dynamical equilibrium between estuarine geometry and tides. The order of magni- tude of changes of mean tidal water levels is particu- larly of importance for water management and eco- logical zonation but is also regarded as a primary indi- cation for changes of tidal currents, salinity and storm surge levels. Therefore the quantitative determination of changes of mean tidal Fig. 1: Elbe estuary, southern North Sea 1 Coastal Research Station of the Lower Saxonian Central State Board for Ecology, P.O. Box 1221, 26534 Norderney/East Frisia, Germany 3307 3308 COASTAL ENGINEERING 1998 peaks and tidal range due to waterway deepening is given high priority in order to qualify its impacts. This is not only necessary for planning purposes but also for the environmental assessment studies and for the later preservation of evidence procedure due to legal require- ments in Germany. Preservation of evidence gets increasingly difficult if subsequent deepen- ings have been carried out and their impacts are still continuing at the beginning of the suc- cessive one.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Tariff Norden
    Port Tariff for the ports managed by Niedersachsen Ports GmbH & Co. KG Baltrum, Bensersiel, Langeoog, Norddeich, Norderney and Wangerooge effective as of 1/1/2021 Contents General Provisions ............................................................................................................................ 2 I. Scope of Application - Port Fees ................................................................................................... 2 II. Definitions/Concepts ........................................................................................................................ 3 Harbor Dues (Ship-Related Fees) .................................................................................................. 6 I. Definition/General ............................................................................................................................ 6 II. Harbor Dues for Oceangoing Vessels ......................................................................................... 6 III. Harbor Dues for Special Water Crafts ....................................................................................... 7 IV. Harbor Dues for Barges ................................................................................................................ 7 V. Harbor Dues for Inland Waterway Passenger Ships ............................................................... 8 VI. Harbor Dues for Passenger Ships ............................................................................................. 8 VII. Harbor Dues for
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Estimates of Mean Sea Level Changes in the South-Eastern North Sea Since 1843
    IMPROVED ESTIMATES OF MEAN SEA LEVEL CHANGES IN THE SOUTH-EASTERN NORTH SEA SINCE 1843 Jürgen Jensen1, Thomas Wahl1 and Torsten Frank1 Keywords: German Bight, regional sea level changes, tide gauge data, vertical land movements This contribution focuses on presenting the results from analysing mean sea level changes in the German Bight, the south-eastern part of the North Sea. Data sets from 13 tide gauges covering the entire German North Sea coastline and the period from 1843 to 2008 have been used to estimate high quality mean sea level time series. The overall results from nonlinear smoothing and linear trend estimations for different time spans are presented. Time series from single tide gauges are analysed as well as different ‘virtual station’ time series. An accelerated sea level rise in the German Bight is detected for a period at the end of the 19th century and for another one covering the last decades. In addition, different patterns of sea level change are found in the German Bight compared to global patterns, highlighting the urgent need to derive reliable regional sea level projections to be considered in coastal planning strategies. 1. INTRODUCTION Changing sea levels are one of the major concerns we have to deal with in times of a warming climate. Many authors recently studied observed global sea level changes based on tide gauge or altimetry data (e.g. Cazenave et al. 2008; Church and White 2006; Church et al. 2008; Domingues et al. 2008; Woodworth et al. 2009; Wöppelmann et al. 2009) and future projections have been assessed through numerical model studies (summarised in Meehl et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Correction of Water Column Height Variation on 2D Grid High-Resolution
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Correction of water column height variation on 2D grid high‑resolution seismic data using dGPS based methodology Ayobami Abegunrin1*, Daniel A. Hepp1 & Tobias Mörz1,2 Variations in the physical properties of water column usually impede exact water column height correction on high‑resolution seismic data, especially when the data are collected in shallow marine environments. Changes in water column properties can be attributed to variation in tides and currents, wind‑generated swells, long and short amplitude wave‑fronts, or variation in salinity and water temperature. Likewise, the proper motion of the vessel complicates the determinability of the water column height. This study provides a less time‑consuming and precise diferential Global Positioning System based methodology that can be applied to most types of high‑resolution seismic data in order to signifcantly improve the tracking and quality of deduced geological interpretations on smaller depth scales. The methodology was tested on geophysical profles obtained from the German sector of the North Sea. The focus here was to identify, distinguish and classify various sub‑surface sedimentary structures in a stratigraphically highly complex shallow marine environment on decimeter small‑scale. After applying the correction to the profles, the sea foor, in general, occurs 1.1 to 3.4 m (mean of 2.2 m) deeper than the uncorrected profles and is consistent with the sea foor from published tide corrected bathymetry data. The corrected seismic profles were used in plotting the depth of the base of Holocene channel structures and to defne their gradients. The applied correction methodology was also crucial in glacial and post‑glacial valley features distinction, across profle correlation and establishing structural and stratigraphic framework of the study area.
    [Show full text]