Paul Morphy and his famous Opera Game

Why it is called the opera game can be explained as follows: the Opera Game was an 1858 game played at an opera house in Paris between the American chess master Paul Morphy and two strong amateurs: the German noble Karl II, Duke of Brunswick and the French aristocrat Comte Isouard de Vauvenargues. It is among the most famous of chess games. Commonly known as Morphy vs the Duke and the Count as they consulted together, playing as partners against Morphy.

In a nutshell the game was concluded after 17 moves as follows:

(1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 Bg4 4 dxe5 Bxf3 5 Qxf3 dxe5 6 Bc4 Nf6 7 Qb3 Qe7 8 Nc3 c6 9 Bg5 b5 10 Nxb5 cxb5 11 Bxb5+ Nbd7 12 O-O-O Rd8 13 Rxd7 Rxd7 14 Rd1 Qe6 15 Bxd7+ Nxd7 16 Qb8+ Nxb8 17 Rd8 mate).

When playing out this game, pay attention to the three most important rules of starting a game:

1.Get your (minor)pieces out and use all of them.

2.Keep your safe.

3.Control the center.

An analysis I also found very helpful from Wikipedia to start off coaching this game is as follows

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6

This is Philidor's Defence, named after François-André Danican Philidor, the leading chess master of the second half of the 18th century and a pioneer of modern . He was also a noted opera composer. It is a solid opening, but slightly passive, and it ignores the important d4-square. Most modern players prefer 2...Nc6, and 2...Nf6. The Petrov Defence is also popular at master level.

3. d4 Bg4?!

Though 3...Bg4 is co bnsidered an inferior move today, this was accepted theory at the time.[1] Today 3...exd4 or 3...Nf6 are usual. Philidor's original idea, 3...f5, is a risky alternative.

4. dxe5 Bxf3

If 4...dxe5, then 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 6.Nxe5 and White wins a and Black has lost the ability to castle. Black, however, did have the option of 4...Nd7 5.exd6 Bxd6, when he's down a pawn but has some in the form of better development.

5. Qxf3

Steinitz's recommendation 5.gxf3 dxe5 6.Qxd8+ Kxd8 7.f4 is also good, but Morphy prefers to keep the queens on. After Black recaptures the pawn on e5, White has a significant lead in development.

5...dxe5 Morphy could have won a pawn by 8.Qxb7 Qb4+ 9.Qxb4 Bxb4+. White can also win material with, for example, 8.Bxf7+ Qxf7 9.Qxb7 Bb4+ 10. c3 0-0 11. Qxb4 or 11. cxb4, among other alternatives, gaining two pawns and developing the queenside. In keeping with his style, Morphy prefers rapid development and over material.

8... c6

The best move, allowing Black to defend his pawn without further weakening the light squares, which have been weakened by Black trading off his light-square .

9. Bg5 b5?

Black attempts to drive away the bishop and gain some time, but this move allows Morphy a strong to keep the initiative. This move loses but it is difficult to find anything better; for example 9...Na6 10.Bxf6 gxf6 11.Bxa6 bxa6 12.Qa4 Qb7 and Black's position is very weak.

10. Nxb5!

Morphy chooses not to retreat the bishop, which would allow Black to gain time for development.

10... cxb5?

Black could have played 10...Qb4+ forcing of queens (11.Qxb4 Bxb4+ 12.c3!).

11. Bxb5+

Not 11.Bd5? Qb4+, unpinning the and allowing the to evade capture.

11... Nbd7 12. 0-0-0 Rd8 (see diagram)

6. Bc4 Nf6? This seemingly sound developing move runs into a surprising refutation. After White's next move, both f7 and b7 will be under attack. Better would have been to directly protect the f7- pawn with the , making White's next move less potent.

7. Qb3 Qe7

Position after 7...Qe7

Black's only good move. White was threatening mate in two moves, for example 7...Nc6 8.Bxf7+ Ke7 (or Kd7) 9.Qe6#. 7...Qd7 loses the rook to 8.Qxb7 followed by 9.Qxa8 (since 8...Qc6? would lose the queen to 9.Bb5). Notice that 7...Qe7 saves the rook with this : 8.Qxb7 Qb4+ forcing a queen exchange. Although this move prevents immediate disaster, Black is forced to the f8-bishop, impeding development and kingside .

8. Nc3 Morphy could have won a pawn by 8.Qxb7 Qb4+ 9.Qxb4 Bxb4+. White can also win material with, for example, 8.Bxf7+ Qxf7 9.Qxb7 Bb4+ 10. c3 0-0 11. Qxb4 or 11. cxb4, among other alternatives, gaining two pawns and developing the queenside. In keeping with his style, Morphy prefers rapid development and initiative over material.

8... c6

The best move, allowing Black to defend his pawn without further weakening the light squares, which have been weakened by Black trading off his light-square bishop.

9. Bg5 b5?

Black attempts to drive away the bishop and gain some time, but this move allows Morphy a strong sacrifice to keep the initiative. This move loses but it is difficult to find anything better; for example 9...Na6 10.Bxf6 gxf6 11.Bxa6 bxa6 12.Qa4 Qb7 and Black's position is very weak.

10. Nxb5!

Morphy chooses no*-t to retreat the bishop, which would allow Black to gain time for development.

10... cxb5?

Black could have played 10...Qb4+ forcing the exchange of queens (11.Qxb4 Bxb4+ 12.c3!).

11. Bxb5+

Not 11.Bd5? Qb4+, unpinning the knight and allowing the rook to evade capture.

11... Nbd7 12. 0-0-0 Rd8 (see diagram)

The combination of the pins on the knights and the for White's rook will lead to Black's defeat.

13. Rxd7 Rxd7

Removing another defender.

14. Rd1

Compare the activity of the white pieces with the idleness of the black pieces. At this point, Black's d7-rook cannot be saved, since it is pinned to the king by the bishop and attacked by the rook, and though the knight defends it, the knight is pinned to the queen.

14... Qe6

Qe6 is a futile attempt to unpin the knight (allowing it to defend the rook) and offer a queen trade, to take some pressure out of the white attack. Even if Morphy did not play his next crushing move, he could have always traded his bishop for the knight, followed by winning the rook.

15. Bxd7+ Nxd7 If 15...Qxd7, then 16.Qb8+ Ke7 17.Qxe5+ Kd8 18.Bxf6+ gxf6 19.Qxf6+ Kc8 20.Rxd7 Kxd7 21.Qxh8 and White is clearly winning. Moving the king leads to mate: 15...Ke7 16.Qb4+ Qd6 (16...Kd8 17.Qb8+ Ke7 18.Qe8#) 17.Qxd6+ Kd8 18.Qb8+ Ke7 19.Qe8# or 15...Kd8 16.Qb8+ Ke7 17.Qe8#.

16. Qb8+!

Morphy finishes with a .

16... Nxb8 17. Rd8# 1–0[2]

1. ^ von Bilguer, Paul Rudolf (1843). Handbuch des Schachspiels. 2. ^ "Paul Morphy vs. Duke Karl / Count Isouard, Paris (1858)". Chessgames.com.

As you coach this game, you can emphasise various sections of the game, ie opening middle endgame, tactics, etc. depending on your lesson. Even top grandmasters can lose quickly if they do not develop their pieces. One example of many is a game between the young Magnus Carlsen and Sergey Dolmatov played in Moscow, 2004 at the 3rd Aeroflot Open.

1.Nf3f52.d3d63.e4e54.Nc3Nc65.exf5Bxf56.d4Nxd47.Nxd4exd48.Qxd4Nf69.Bc4c610.Bg5b511.Bb3Be 712.O-O-OQd713.Rhe1Kd814.Rxe7Qxe715.Qf4Bd716.Ne4d517.Nxf6h618.Bh4g519.Qd41-0

Nevertheless this is a good way of kicking off your chess coaching in game analysis when you are not sure where to start.