DOCSLIB.ORG

Is Danish Honesty in Culling and Dissecting Giraffes in Public a Good Idea?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is Danish Honesty in Culling and Dissecting Giraffes in Public a Good Idea? Vet Times The website for the veterinary profession https://www.vettimes.co.uk Is Danish honesty in culling and dissecting giraffes in public a good idea? Author : BRADLEY VINER Categories : Vets Date : March 31, 2014 IT seems Marius is not a lucky name if you happen to be a giraffe, particularly if you live in Denmark. Or perhaps all male Danish giraffes go by that name. The scene was set in Copenhagen Zoo in early February, when it announced Marius was not genetically significant enough to remain a member of their herd of eight and, therefore, he was despatched by means of a captive bolt, and, presumably, a very high ladder. His carcase was then dissected in public. Videos of the dissection were distributed on social networks by kids with mobile phones, as well as photos of vestiges of reticulated skin and its associated flesh being munched by one of the zoo’s magnificent male lions, who must surely be called Magnus. Presumably working on the principle that any publicity is good publicity, Jesper Mohring-Jensen, the head zoologist at Jyllands Park Zoo 200 miles to the west, then announced its Marius was “genetically uninteresting” and was due to be killed later in the year. Animal rights activists promptly announced Mr Mohring-Jensen was also due to be killed later this year. One has to admire his forthrightness in the face of such threats. “A zoo is not a sanctuary for cute animals in my opinion; it’s a professional establishment. I really like Americans, but I dislike the Disney way of thinking – that it’s all pink and it’s all love and everything. That’s not the way it is,” adding another 316,148,990 to the list of people that really hate him. As for American animal rights activists… Honesty policy I have no problem with giraffes being used as a source of food. During a trip to South Africa I ate springbok, eland and kudu without any qualms and, in reality, as ruminants giraffes are just high- rise cows. It does seem as if our reluctance to cull animals is proportional to their good looks – cue dear old Mr Brock. However, the role of zoos as we know them is itself questionable, and I can’t 1 / 4 help wondering, is the Danish honesty in culling and then dissecting giraffes in public really a good idea? It seems to me the rationale for culling these giraffes is perfectly sound, as is the rationale behind getting as much as possible from that cull by educating children and then feeding carnivores. However, carefully avoiding any puns about sticking my neck out (damn), I have to question what benefit is served by the giraffes being in Denmark in the first place. Or to go even further and question what function zoos serve at all. The conservation argument, when it comes to large mammals such as the giraffe, is very thin, as we know it is destruction of its habitat and conflict with humans that are the real threats. The giraffe is categorised as a species of “least concern” by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, which means it does not qualify for the categories of “Threatened”, “Near-threatened” or even “Conservation Dependent”, and I was not able to find evidence of any intention to reintroduce the captive-bred European giraffe into its natural African habitat. In general, the role of zoos in conserving species in their natural environment is minimal. If not conservation, then education. There is certainly a role zoos can play in this sphere, but I can’t help feeling taking large mammals, such as the giraffe, so far out of their natural habitat and displaying them on a site close to the centre of an urban sprawl provides much less understanding of their ecological role than a good blast of David Attenborough and the BBC wildlife department. This leaves me with the uneasy feeling zoos are primarily about entertainment, and is why they were established in the first place. Even the videos of Marius being dissected, readily found on YouTube, are probably seen more as a grisly form of entertainment than education. Surely zoos can only educate the general public about animals if they are able to display them in an environment that approximates to their natural habitat? If that is accepted, then what is the justification for displaying a wide range of large mammals, other than to draw in the public? My family was fortunate enough to be able to go on a Kenyan safari more than 20 years ago and, having seen the wildlife roaming in its natural habitat, all four of us swore we would never visit a zoo again. I fully appreciate that only a few of us are able to enjoy such an experience, but I don’t see zoos as being second best for those unable to go on safari. In respect of large, non-indigenous mammals, they are often worse than seeing nothing at all. Despite the cold logic of its argument, Jyllands Park Zoo later rescinded Marius’ death sentence, saying the threat had been based on the hypothetical situation of a new breeding female arriving and that threat had “now been eliminated”. There is a great deal of high quality academic research that goes on behind the scenes at many of the zoological societies, but the reality is their public collections depend on being able to entertain families. Culling animals is a necessary evil. Doing it in public may seem honest and open, but highlights many of the paradoxes of the keeping of 2 / 4 zoological collections themselves and thus threaten their very existence. 3 / 4 4 / 4 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kruger National Park Elephant Management Plan
    Elephant Management Plan Kruger National Park 2013-2022 Scientific Services November 2012 Contact details Mr Danie Pienaar, Head of Scientific Services, SANParks, Skukuza, 1350, South Africa Email: [email protected], Tel: +27 13 735 4000 Elephant Management Kruger Authorisation This Elephant Management Plan for the Kruger National Park was compiled by Scientific Services and the Kruger Park Management of SANParks. The group represented several tiers of support and management services in SANParks and consisted of: Scientific Services Dr Hector Magome Managing Executive: Conservation Services Dr Peter Novellie Senior General Manager: Conservation Services Dr Howard Hendricks General Manager: Policy and Governance Mr Danie Pienaar Senior General Manager: Scientific Services Dr Stefanie Freitag-Ronaldson General Manager: Scientific Services Savanna & Arid Nodes Dr Sam Ferreira Scientist: Large Mammal Ecology Kruger Park Management Mr Phin Nobela Senior Manager: Conservation Management Mr Nick Zambatis Manager: Conservation Management Mr Andrew Desmet Manager: Guided Activities and Conservation Interpretation Mr Albert Machaba Regional Ranger: Nxanatseni North Mr Louis Olivier Regional Ranger: Nxanatseni South Mr Derick Mashale Regional Ranger: Marula North Mr Mbongeni Tukela Regional Ranger: Marula South Ms Sandra Basson Section Ranger: Pafuri Mr Thomas Mbokota Section Ranger: Punda Maria Mr Stephen Midzi Section Ranger: Shangoni Ms Agnes Mukondeleli Section Ranger: Vlakteplaas Mr Marius Renkin Section Ranger: Shingwedzi Ms Tinyiko
    [Show full text]
  • Danish Zoo Defends Lion Killing After Giraffe Cull 26 March 2014, by Jan M
    Danish zoo defends lion killing after giraffe cull 26 March 2014, by Jan M. Olsen "Furthermore we couldn't risk that the male lion mated with the old female as she was too old to be mated with again due to the fact that she would have difficulties with birth and parental care of another litter," the zoo said. The cubs were also put down because they were not old enough to fend for themselves and would have been killed by the new male lion anyway, officials said. Zoo officials hope the new male and two females born in 2012 will form the nucleus of a new pride. They said the culling "may seem harsh, but in nature is necessary to ensure a strong pride of This is a Sunday, Feb. 9, 2014 file photo of the carcass lions with the greatest chance of survival." of Marius, a male giraffe, as it is eaten by lions after he was put down in Copenhagen Zoo . The zoo that faced In February, the zoo faced protests and even death protests for killing a healthy giraffe to prevent inbreeding threats after it killed a 2-year-old giraffe, citing the says it has put down four lions, including two cubs, to need to prevent inbreeding. make room for a new male lion. Citing the "pride's natural structure and behavior," the Copenhagen Zoo This time the zoo wasn't planning any public said Tuesday March 25, 2014 that two old lions had dissection. Still, the deaths drew protests on social been euthanized as part of a generational shift.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservazione Ed Etica Negli Zoo “Dopo Marius”
    703 Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XX, 2018, 3, pp. 703-729. ISSN: 1825-5167 CONSERVAZIONE ED ETICA NEGLI ZOO “DOPO MARIUS” LINDA FERRANTE Università di Padova Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione [email protected] BARBARA DE MORI Università di Padova Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione [email protected] ABSTRACT The case of Marius, a young giraffe suppressed in the name of species conservation in February 2014 at Copenhagen Zoo as a surplus, created both considerable media outcry and heated debate both in science and ethics. Debate that even today, after almost 5 years still has not subsided. In this contribution, we try to confront with the reiterated question ‘are zoos unethical?’, discussing ‘from the inside’ the presuppositions of specie conservation in zoos today. Following the main questions that have been raised on the web regarding the case of Marius, we suggest that in ethical relevant issues as Marius’ case, a standardized and contextualized ethical analysis on a case-by-case basis can be of help. By clarifying assumptions, considering the values at stake, the scientific aspects and the needs of the stakeholders involved, it is possible to improve the ethical decision-making process. This process can favor the transparency and consistency of the work of the zoos. The request for standardized ethical assessments through ethics committees and the use of tools for analysys has already emerged in different zoological context. If they want to continue to have support from society, it is mandatory for modern zoos to make a commitment to take directly into consideration the difficulties and uncertainties that distinguish the new social ethics for animals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Story for You to Continue, November 27, 2015
    You are cordially invited to our spectacle "A story for you to continue” on Friday, November 27, 2015, 8PM at Scene 7 in the Oslo Academy of Theatre, Fossveien 24. We are presenting staff, students & alumni from the Oslo Art Academy such as Rike Frank, Kristian Øverland Dahl, Mike Sperlinger, Vikram Uchida-Khanna, Dag-Erik Elgin, Linnea Jardemark, David Torstensson, Elisabeth Samstad, Vanessa Ohlraun, Anton Jawdokimov, Silje Iversen Kristiansen and Andreas Olavssønn Rongen, all reading tragic and strange stories about vanity, fashion, migration, geopolitics, trade, taxidermia and more. Jan Verwoert accompanies this with his electric guitar and analogue synthesizers. This is a story about the faith of exotic animals in our culture, told through a portrait of our school. I am curious to see what happens and wish you all welcome. Best, Felix A story for you to continue, November 27, 2015 We are in a big black room built for performing theatre: Scenekunst 7 at the Oslo Academy of Theatre within the Olso National Academy of Arts. A large green screen serves as a stage set. The room is crowded, many do not find a seat. The room smells a little bit of the Dior perfume J’Adore, a perfume bottle that resembles Massai long neck collars. Once the audience is comfortable our master of ceremonies Mike Sperlinger enters the room. He places a bottle of Dior J’Adore on a table. On the table we also find some hats and wigs. They are designed by Ida Falk and her Oslo situated design collective Hajk for the participants to use if they want to.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welfare of Zoo-Housed Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes) with Special Attention to Auditory Enrichment
    The Welfare of Zoo-housed Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) with Special Attention to Auditory Enrichment Emma Katherine Wallace PhD University of York Psychology November 2016 Abstract Modern zoos house millions of wild animals but also aim to conduct animal research, educate visitors about the natural world and support conservation programmes via funding and encouraging wildlife-friendly actions by the public. However, the benefit to conservation efforts and species living in the wild, through fundraising and increasing public awareness, may come at the cost of the animals living within zoos. In this thesis I focussed on the welfare of zoo-housed chimpanzees due to their endangered status and public popularity. I investigated potential social, dietary and visitor related triggers for anxiety-related behaviours (yawning and scratching) and regurgitation and reingestion (R/R). Despite interesting trends, no immediate triggers for these behaviours were found. However, long-term data showed the frequency with which individuals engage in R/R reduced over time when part of a complex group inhabiting an enclosure encouraging natural behaviours and social dynamics. I also examined if music, frequently broadcast to captive chimpanzees, provides any enriching effect on their welfare. Both observational and experimental research suggested that whilst music does not appear to have any obvious positive welfare effects it is equally not detrimental. The final study explored whether public education, one of assumed benefits associated with having animals in zoos, is achieved via ‘Keeper Talks’. They were effective at demonstrating to adult visitors that touchscreens are an effective form of enrichment for chimpanzees but the talks had no significant effect on their knowledge of other issues covered, or any area of knowledge in young people.
    [Show full text]
  • Irus Braverman Saving Species, One Individual at a Time: Zoo
    H U M a N I M A L I A 9:2 Irus Braverman Saving Species, One Individual at a Time: Zoo Veterin arians Between Welfare and Conservation Figure 1. Reticulated giraffe at the St. Louis Zoo. Photo by Robert Lawton, Nov. 11, 2005. CC BY-SA 3.0. “I save a species, one individual at a time.” --- Kelly Helmick (DSM). Supervisory Medical Officer, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute; Former President, American Association of Zoo Veterinarians (personal communication, February 15, 2016) Who Killed Marius? On February 9, 2014, two-year old giraffe “Marius” was killed at the Copenhagen Zoo. Marius was not sick or old. He was killed because he was what zoo professionals refer to as a surplus animal. A member of the reticulated giraffe species ( Giraffa amelopardalis reticulate ), Marius was managed by the European Endangered species Programme, or EEP. According to Bengt Holst, scientific director at Copenhagen Zoo: “our giraffes are all part of the European breeding programme for giraffes, and as a pure reticulated giraffe, this giraffe was one of a European population of a little more than one hundred giraffes distributed over 35 European zoos.” “Because he comes from a genetic line that has bred very well over the past years,” Holst concluded, “there was no space for him anywhere in the population, and he was 2 declared ‘surplus’” (Holst 1). In simpler terms, the Copenhagen Zoo killed Marius to prevent in-breeding within the captive breeding program (McLaughlin and Wilkinson). The ethics of the Zoo’s decision to kill Marius have been widely discussed and dissected, both in mainstream media (e.g., McLaughlin and Wilkinson; Eriksen and Kennedy; Morell; Parker) and in academia (Bekoff; Braverman, Wild Life ; McCulloch and Reiss).
    [Show full text]
  • Zoo Veterinarians Between Welfare and Conservation
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Spring 4-1-2018 Saving Species, One Individual at a Time: Zoo Veterinarians Between Welfare and Conservation Irus Braverman University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Irus Braverman, Saving Species, One Individual at a Time: Zoo Veterinarians Between Welfare and Conservation, 9 Humanimalia 1 (2018). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/922 First published in Humanimalia volume 92, number 2, https://www.depauw.edu/humanimalia/issue%2018/ braverman.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUM a N I M A L I A 9:2 Irus Braverman Saving Species, One Individual at a Time: Zoo Veterinarians Between Welfare and Conservation Figure 1. Reticulated giraffe at the St. Louis Zoo. Photo by Robert Lawton, Nov. 11, 2005. CC BY-SA 3.0. “I save a species, one individual at a time.” --- Kelly Helmick (DSM). Supervisory Medical Officer, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute; Former President, American Association of Zoo Veterinarians (personal communication, February 15, 2016) Who Killed Marius? On February 9, 2014, two-year old giraffe “Marius” was killed at the Copenhagen Zoo.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiotic Dimensions of Human Attitudes Towards Other Animals: a Case of Zoological Gardens
    Semiotic dimensions of humanSign attitudes Systems Studiestowards 44(1/2), other animals 2016, 209–230 209 Semiotic dimensions of human attitudes towards other animals: A case of zoological gardens Nelly Mäekivi, Timo Maran Department of Semiotics University of Tartu Jakobi 2, Tartu, 51014, Estonia e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. This paper analyses the cultural and biosemiotic bases of human attitudes towards other species. A critical stance is taken towards species neutrality and it is shown that human attitudes towards different animal species differ depending on the psychological dispositions of the people, biosemiotic conditions (e.g. umwelt stuctures), cultural connotations and symbolic meanings. In real-life environments, such as zoological gardens, both biosemiotic and cultural aspects influence which animals are chosen for display, as well as the various ways in which they are displayed and interpreted. These semiotic dispositions are further used as motifs in staging, personifying or de-personifying animals in order to modify visitors’ perceptions and attitudes. As a case study, the contrasting interpretations of culling a giraffe at the Copenhagen zoo are discussed. The communicative encounters and shifting per ceptions are mapped on the scales of welfaristic, conservational, dominionistic, and utilitarian approaches. The methodological approach described in this article integrates static and dynamical views by proposing to analyse the semiotic potential of animals and the dynamics of communicative interactions in combination. Keywords: zoosemiotics; zoological gardens; animal evaluation; charismatic species; personification Introduction The aim of the present paper is to map the semiotic aspects of human evaluation of non human animals. The question of human attitudes towards nonhuman animals is predominantly tackled by in environmental psychology, animal welfare studies etc., but it also falls in the realm of semiotic study, as it is connected with cultural codes and practices, symbols and connotative meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemurs of Madagascar – a Strategy for Their
    Cover photo: Diademed sifaka (Propithecus diadema), Critically Endangered. (Photo: Russell A. Mittermeier) Back cover photo: Indri (Indri indri), Critically Endangered. (Photo: Russell A. Mittermeier) Lemurs of Madagascar A Strategy for Their Conservation 2013–2016 Edited by Christoph Schwitzer, Russell A. Mittermeier, Nicola Davies, Steig Johnson, Jonah Ratsimbazafy, Josia Razafindramanana, Edward E. Louis Jr., and Serge Rajaobelina Illustrations and layout by Stephen D. Nash IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation Conservation International This publication was supported by the Conservation International/Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation Primate Action Fund, the Bristol, Clifton and West of England Zoological Society, Houston Zoo, the Institute for the Conservation of Tropical Environments, and Primate Conservation, Inc. Published by: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, and Conservation International Copyright: © 2013 IUCN Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Inquiries to the publisher should be directed to the following address: Russell A. Mittermeier, Chair, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA Citation: Schwitzer C, Mittermeier RA, Davies N, Johnson S, Ratsimbazafy J, Razafindramanana J, Louis Jr. EE, Rajaobelina S (eds). 2013. Lemurs of Madagascar: A Strategy for Their Conservation 2013–2016. Bristol, UK: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, and Conservation International. 185 pp. ISBN: 978-1-934151-62-4 Illustrations: © Stephen D.
    [Show full text]
  • EAZA Annual Report 2013-2014
    Annual Report 2013-14 EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AQUARIA Annual Report 2013-14 Contents 3 Mission and Vision 4 Report from the Chairman 5 Report from the Executive Director 11 Aquarium Committee 12 Conservation Committee 14 Education Committee 15 EEP Committee 18 Legislation Committee 19 Membership & Ethics Committee 20 Research Committee 21 Technical Assistance Committee 22 Veterinary Committee 24 EAZA Academy 26 Treasurer’s Report 27 Financial Report 29 Governance and Organisational Structure 30 EAZA Council 31 EAZA Executive Office 32 EAZA Members 40 Corporate Members Cover image: Young Rothschild Giraffe at Planckendael Zoo ©Jonas Verhulst 2 Annual Report 2013-14 Mission and Vision Our Mission “EAZA’s mission is to facilitate co-operation within the European zoo and aquarium community with the aim of furthering its professional quality in keeping animals and presenting them for the education of the public, and of contributing to scientific research and to the conservation of global biodiversity. It will achieve these aims through stimulation, facilitation and co-ordination of the community’s efforts in education, conservation and scientific research, through the enhancement of co-operation with all relevant organisations and through influencing relevant legislation within the EU.” Our Vision “To be the most dynamic, innovative and effective zoo and aquarium membership organisation in Europe” 3 Annual Report 2013-14 Report from the EAZA Chairman e learn far more about ourselves, and our organisations, when things go wrong than we ever do when all is Wsweetness and light. This was never more clearly illustrated than early in 2014 when a routine cull of a surplus male giraffe at Copenhagen Zoo was turned into a media frenzy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Meat Crisis | P 2 Zoos in the Media | P 8 Exhibit News | P 24 Annual Report 2013 | Insert ) at UWEC, Uganda
    August 3/14 2014 Bush Meat Crisis | p 2 Zoos in the Media | p 8 Exhibit News | p 24 Annual Report 2013 | insert ) at UWEC, Uganda. | © Gerald Dick, WAZA Gerald Dick, Uganda. | © UWEC, ) at Balaeniceps rex Shoebill ( WAZA news 3/14 WAZA news 3/14 1 Gerald Dick Lee Ehmke Contents Editorial The President’s Message » Dear WAZA members and friends! Bush Meat Crisis .........................2 WAZA Marketing …personal Conference .................................6 Decade on Biodiversity connections and Workshop ...................................7 Different Frames face‑to‑face inter‑ for the Same Picture .................. 8 © WAZA Shipping Sharks ........................ 11 This magic QR code symbolizes the Lee and a tiger’s kiss. actions are critical to My Career: start of our global biodiversity project, Gordon McGregor Reid ............. 13 “Biodiversity Is Us” and if scanned by challenging logistical WAZA Interview: your smartphone or tablet leads you Mark Irwin ................................. 17 directly to the application which can be and bureaucratic used and integrated in visitor informa- Book Reviews ...........................20 tion and engagement. Every WAZA barriers… Announcements ....................... 21 member and all zoo and aquarium Closing Zoos? – NO!.................. 23 staff should download it and help to © WAZA make it known to the public. It is free Gerald Dick and shoebill (Balaeniceps rex) at UWEC, Uganda. New Exhibit News ....................24 and offers numerous features (per- One of the most stimulating and The
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015 EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION of ZOOS and AQUARIA Annual Report 2015
    Annual Report 2015 EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AQUARIA Annual Report 2015 Contents 3 Mission and Vision 4 Report from the Chairman 5 Report from the Executive Director 10 Aquarium Committee 11 Communications Committee 12 Conservation Committee 14 Education Committee 15 EEP Committee 18 Legislation Committee 19 Membership & Ethics Committee 20 National Associations Committee 21 Research Committee 22 Technical Assistance Committee 23 Veterinary Committee 25 EAZA Academy 27 Treasurer’s Report 27 Financial Report 30 Governance and Organisational Structure 31 EAZA Council 32 EAZA Executive Office 33 EAZA Members 41 Corporate Members Cover image: Pallas’ Cat (Otocolobus manul) © Tom Svensson, Norden’s Ark 2 Annual Report 2015 Mission and Vision Our Mission “EAZA’s mission is to facilitate co-operation within the European zoo and aquarium community with the aim of furthering its professional quality in keeping animals and presenting them for the education of the public, and of contributing to scientific research and to the conservation of global biodiversity. It will achieve these aims through stimulation, facilitation and co-ordination of the community’s efforts in education, conservation and scientific research, through the enhancement of co-operation with all relevant organisations and through influencing relevant legislation within the EU.” Our Vision “To be the most dynamic, innovative and effective zoo and aquarium membership organisation in Europe” 3 Annual Report 2015 Report from the EAZA Chairman fter the enormous upheavals of 2014 it is GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF ANIMALS IN PUBLIC a relief to be able to report more normal DEMONSTRATIONS WERE INITIATED IN 2015 levels of activity for the Association in A2015.
    [Show full text]