DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Vallejo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Vallejo ~~~-~~-:-Vallejo ~General Plan VALLEJO GENERAL PLAN July 1999 City Council Mayor Gloria Exline Vice Mayor Joanne Schivley Dan Donahue Foster Hicks Raymond Martin Pamela Pitts Pete Rey Planning Commission Chairperson Richard Evans Vice Chairperson Mohsen Sultan Paul L. Beeman Mary Fraser Kurt Heckman Jimmie Jackson Betty Walker David R. Martinez, City Manager John Powers, City Attorney Alesia Jones-Martin, Assistant City Attorney Ann Merideth, Development Services Director Michael Meiring, Planning Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SCOPE AND USE OF THE PLAN.................................................................. I - 1 II. SUMMARY OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ..................................... II - 1 Land Use................................................................................................ II - 1 Circulation and Transportation.................................................................... II - 9 Housing .................................................................................................. II - 13 Educationai.Facilities ................................................................................. ll- 20 Public Facilities and Other Services ............................................................. II - 22 Safety .................................................................................................... II - 24 Noise ..................................................................................................... II - 27 Air Quality .............................................................................................. II - 27 Natural Resources ........................................................ , ........................... II - 29 Ill. LAND USE .............................................................................................. Ill - 1 A. Vallejo's Role in the Bay Area.............................................................. Ill - 1 1. Regional Context.......................................................................... Ill - 1 2. Historic Role .................................................................................. Ill - 2 3. Present and Future Role .................................................................. Ill - 2 B. Urban Design ...................................................................................... Ill - 5 1. City Identity ................................................................................. Ill - 5 2. Creating Neighborhoods................................................................. Ill - 5 3. Business Street Design.................................................................. Ill - 5 C. Hillside Development ........................................................................... Ill - 7 D. Waterfront Development ..................................................................... Ill - 10 1. Carquinez Strait I Glen Cove ......................................................... Ill - 11 2. Mare Island ................................................................................ Ill - 11 3. South Vallejo Industrial Area ........................................................ Ill - 11 4. Downtown I Marina Vista ............................................................. Ill - 11 5. San Pablo Bay ............................................................................ Ill - 11 6. White Slough.............................................................................. Ill - 11 7. Napa River Waterfront ................................................................ Ill - 12 E. Land Use Compatibility and Density .................................................... Ill - 13 1. Insuring Compatibility .................................................................. Ill - 13 2. Density Ranges ........................................................................... Ill - 13 F. Commercial Development .................................................................. Ill - 14 1. Major Commercial Areas .............................................................. Ill - 14 2. Types of Commercial Development ................................................ Ill - 1 5 3. Levels of Retail Development ........................................................ Ill - 17 4. Strip Commercial Development . .. Ill - 1 8 G. Industrial Development. ..................................................................... Ill - 20 H. Agricultural Production . Ill - 23 I. Compatibility Standards for Land Use Designations............................... Ill - 23 IV. CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION .................................................... IV- 1 A. Mobility........................................................................................... IV - 1 1 . Providing Choices........................................................................ IV - 1 2. Reducing Pollution ... ..... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... ... .... ..... .. ... ... .... .. .... .. IV - 1 B. Street and Highway System............................................................... IV - 2 1 . Freeways................................................................................... IV - 2 2. State Highways ... ... .... .. ... .. .. ... .. .... .. .. .. ... ..... ... ... .. .. .. .... .. IV - 4 3. Arterial Streets ....... ..... ......... ... ...... ... .. .. ... ... ... ...... ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. IV - 4 4. Collector Streets.......................................................................... IV - 5 C. Traffic Safety................................................................................... IV - 6 D. Compatibility with Adjoining Land Uses . .. IV - 7 E. Transit ... .. .. ... ... .. ....... .... ... .... ...... .. .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ..... .... ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. IV - 8 1 . Serving New Residential Areas...................................................... IV - 8 2. Transit Dependent Households...................................................... V - 8 F. Parking............................................................................................ IV- 9 G. Non-Motorized Transportation ............................................................ IV- 10 1. Bicycle Traffic ............................................................................ IV - 10 2. Pedestrian Traffic ....................................................................... IV - 11 H. Scenic Highways .............................................................................. IV - 1 2 V. HOUSING .......................................................................... Under Separate Cover VI. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Vl-1 A. Introduction..................................................................................... VI - 1 B. The Requirement for an Education Element .. .. .. ... ... .... ..... .. ....... .. .. .. .. .. VI - 1 C. Existing Educational Facilities in Vallejo . .... .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ....... .. .. .... ... VI - 2 1. Vallejo City Unified School District .. ....... .. .. ... .. ... ... ... .. ........ .. ...... VI - 2 2. Other Public Educational Services and Facilities .. .... .... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... VI - 3 3. Private Educational Services and Facilities....................................... VI - 3 D. Growth in Vallejo.............................................................................. VI - 3 E. Existing and Future Educational Needs................................................. VI - 3 F. The Issues to be Resolved . .. VI - 4 1 . Promoting Educational Quality . .. VI - 4 2. Meeting Existing and Future Needs .. ... .. ... .. ... .... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... VI - 5 3. Funding Options ... ... ... .. ... .. ... ... .. .. .. ... .. ... .... ... .. .. .. .... .. .. ... VI - 6 VII. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND OTHER SERVICES ............................................... VII- 1 A. Parks and Open Space . ... ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .... ... .. .. .. ... .. .. VII - 1 B. Other Services . .. ... .. ... ... ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. VII - 5 1. Wastewater (Sanitary Sewer) System............................................. VII - 5 2. Storm Water System................................................................... VII - 6 3. Water Distribution ....................................................................... VII - 6 4. Street Maintenance ....... ... .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .... .... ... .. .. .. .. ..... .. ... VII - 7 5. Solid Waste Collection .. ... ... ..... ... .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. ..... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... VII - 7 6. Fire Services . .. ... ... ..... .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. ... .. ... ... ... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... VII - 8 7. Police Services . VII - 8 VIII. SAFETY ............................................................................................... VIII - 1 Risk Definition ....................................................................................... VIII - 1 B. Seismic Hazards ............................................................................... VIII - 2 1. Seismic Shaking ......................................................................... VIII - 3 ii 2. Fault Rupture Potential ................................................................ VIII - 3 3. Liquefaction Potential .................................................................. VIII - 4 4. Tsunamis, Seiches, Potential Inundation Due to Dam Failure ............. VIII - 5 C. Slope Instability ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solano Local Agency Formation Commission 675 Texas St
    Solano Local Agency Formation Commission 675 Texas St. Ste. 6700 Fairfield, California 94533 (707) 439-3897 FAX: (707) 438-1788 Solano County Government Center - Board of Supervisors Chambers 675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 February 27, 2017 – 1:30 PM Public parking is available on the second floor of the parking garage adjacent to the Solano County Government Center. Vehicular entrance to the parking garage is on Delaware St. Materials related to an item on this agenda are available for public inspection at the LAFCO staff office at 675 Texas St. Ste. 6700 Fairfield, CA during normal business hours and on the LAFCO’s website at www.solanolafco.com. If you or your agent has made a contribution of $250 or more to any Commissioner or Alternate during the 12 months preceding the decision, you and the Commissioner are obligated to disclose the contribution and that Commissioner or Alternate must disqualify himself or herself from the decision. However, disqualification is not required if the Commissioner or Alternate returns the campaign contribution within thirty (30) days of learning both about the contribution and the fact that you are a participant in the proceedings. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the LAFCO staff, at (707) 439-3898, by e-mail to [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible, and at least two business days before the start of the meeting. If you wish to speak on an agenda item, green speaker cards are provided near the back wall of the Chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Appendix G Surface Hydrologic Study
    Appendix G Surface Hydrologic Study 1174109001-32046 LAKE HERMAN QUARRY PROPOSED EXPANSION SURFACE HYDROLOGIC STUDY April 2013 Prepared for: Solano County Department of Resource Management Planning Services Division 675 Texas Street, Suite 5500 Fairfield CA, 94533 Prepared by: 633 Third Street Eureka, CA 95501 (707) 443-8326 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Mining Expansion ................................................................................ 1 2.0 Site description ...................................................................................................................2 2.1 Topography and Soil ............................................................................................ 2 2.2 Watershed and Drainages .................................................................................... 3 2.3 Rainfall ................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 Regulatory Setting .............................................................................................................3 4.0 Hydrologic Analysis ...........................................................................................................5 4.1 Hydrologic Analysis Methodology......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 03.5 Geology and Soils
    County of Solano – Solano360 Specific Plan Draft EIR Geology and Soils 3.5 - Geology and Soils 3.5.1 - Introduction This section describes the existing geology, soils, and seismicity setting and potential effects from project implementation on the site and its surrounding area. Descriptions and analysis in this section are based on information from the Vallejo General Plan and the Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by ENGEO in November 2011. The Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration Report is included in this EIR as Appendix E. 3.5.2 - Environmental Setting Geology and Soils Regional Setting The City of Vallejo is located along the western coastal margin of the seismically active Coast Range Geomorphic Province of Northern California. This region is dominated by northwest-southeast trending ranges of low mountains and intervening valleys. The regional structure of the Coast Ranges of northern California consists of northwest trending folds and faults created by the tectonic setting of colliding plate boundaries and subsequent transitional shear along the San Andreas Fault system. The regional folding and faulting of the Mesozoic and Tertiary age rocks of this area have created the foothills north of Carquinez Strait, the outlet of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system. Project Site The project site is located at 900 Fairgrounds Drive in Vallejo, California. The 149.11-acre site is located immediately southwest of the Stated Route 37 and Interstate 80 junction, situated approximately 2 miles southwest of Sulphur Springs Mountain and 2 miles east of the Napa River. Lake Chabot is located directly west of the subject site, divided from the site by Fairgrounds Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Technical Report Mapping of the West Napa
    FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT MAPPING OF THE WEST NAPA FAULT ZONE FOR INPUT INTO THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA QUATERNARY FAULT DATABASE USGS External Award Number 05HQAG0002 Investigators John R. Wesling Department of Conservation Office of Mine Reclamation 801 K Street, MS 09-06 Sacramento, CA 95814-3529 (916) 323-9277, FAX (916) 322-4862 [email protected] Kathryn L. Hanson AMEC Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. 2101 Webster Street, 12th Floor Oakland, California 94612 (510) 663-4146, FAX (510) 663-4141 [email protected] Note This final technical report also summarizes work that was completed as part of U.S. Grant Number 1434-98-GR-00018. Mr. Andrew Thomas, Dr. Frank (Bert) Swan, and Ms. Jennifer Thornberg participated in the earlier study. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 1.1 APPROACH..............................................................................................................2 1.2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................3 2.0 GEOLOGIC AND TECTONIC SETTING.......................................................................4 3.0 MAPPING OF THE WEST NAPA FAULT ZONE.........................................................8 3.1 ST. HELENA – DRY CREEK .....................................................................................9 3.2 YOUNTVILLE – NORTH NAPA ...............................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Budget
    ANNUAL BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021 – 2022 American Canyon, California www.cityofamericancanyon.org Page 2 | City of American Canyon Annual Budget Fiscal Year 2021-2022 | Page Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents www.cityofamericancanyon.org | Page 3 Table of Contents Introduction General Fund 8 How to Use This Document 100 General Fund Revenues by Category 10 Budget Calendar 103 Analysis of Major General Fund Revenues 11 Budget Process 110 General Fund Expenditures and Transfers About American Canyon Administration 14 City Manager Transmittal Letter 114 Organization Chart 26 City Council Members 115 Summary 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget 27 City Council Goals + Priorities City Council 28 Service Delivery Structure — City Organization Chart 116 Overview 29 Executive Team 117 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget 30 American Canyon History City Manager 33 Community Map 118 Overview 34 Community Overview 119 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget 36 Community Demographics City Clerk 40 Sustainability Statistics 2021 120 Overview 122 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget Budget Summaries City Attorney 43 Introduction 123 Overview 44 General Fund Multi-Year Projections 124 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget 46 Revenues Chart Human Resources & Risk Management 47 Expenses Chart 125 Overview 48 Summary - Funds 127 HR 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget 51 Summary - Revenues 128 RM 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget 52 Summary - Expenditures Economic Development 55 Summary - Staffing 129 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget 60 Interfund Transfers Housing Services 130 2021-22 Fiscal Year Budget Fund Summaries 64 2021-22
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    4.0 CONSERVATION AN TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.0 CONSERVATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 PURPOSE ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 RESERVE DESIGN PRINCIPLES .............................................................................. 4-2 4.3 CONSERVATION ANALYSIS BY NATURAL COMMUNITY .............................. 4-6 4.3.1 Landscape Level Key Conservation Elements ................................................. 4-6 4.3.1.1 Corridors ......................................................................................... 4-7 4.3.1.2 Rarity-Weighted Richness Index .................................................... 4-8 4.3.1.3 Climate Change ............................................................................... 4-9 ALYSIS 4.3.2 Valley Floor Grassland and Vernal Pools ...................................................... 4-11 4.3.2.1 Associated Covered Species and Special Management Species .......................................................................................... 4-12 4.3.2.2 Key Conservation Elements .......................................................... 4-12 4.3.2.3 Conservation Areas ....................................................................... 4-17 4.3.3 Inner Coast Range .......................................................................................... 4-20 4.3.3.1 Associated Covered and Special Management Species
    [Show full text]
  • 4.05 Cultural & Paleo
    4.5 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the potential impacts to cultural resources and paleontological resources from the proposed Project. Cultural resources include archaeological resources, traditional cultural properties, and historic architectural resources. Paleontological resources include fossil specimens, fossil sites, and fossil-bearing rock units. SETTING Regional Overview Prehistoric Archaeological and Ethnographic Overview The following overviews are taken from A Cultural Resources Study for the Lake Herman Quarry Expansion Project EIR, Near Vallejo, Solano County, California (Scher 2010a) and A California Register of Historical Resources District Evaluation of the Brownlie Mercury Mining Complex, near Vallejo, Solano County, California (Scher 2010b). An analytic framework for the interpretation of the Bay area, including Solano County, prehistory is provided by Fredrickson (1974), who divided human history in California into three broad periods: the Paleoindian period, the Archaic period, and the Emergent period. This scheme used sociopolitical complexity, trade networks, population, and the introduction and variations of artifact types to differentiate between cultural units. This scheme, with minor revisions remains the dominant framework for prehistoric archaeological research in the region. The earliest documented human occupation in California, the Paleoindian period (ca. 10,000- 6000 B.C.), was a time of variable climate, rising sea levels, and other broad-scale environmental change. People lived in small, highly mobile groups, moving through broad geographic areas and leaving relatively meager archaeological remains. With the more stable climate of the long Archaic period (6000 B.C. to A.D. 1000), people gradually became more sedentary, new groups entered the area, and regional distinctions developed. The Archaic has been divided into three subperiods (Lower, Middle, and Upper), based on changes in sociopolitical complexity, trade networks, populations, and the introduction of new artifact types.
    [Show full text]
  • Northgate Specific Plan
    NORTHGATE SPECIFIC PLAN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTED BY THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 25, 1988. AMENDED BY THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 26, 1989. AMENDED BY THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 30, 1999. AMENDED BY THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 29, 2003. (RESOLUTION NUMBER 03-259 N.C.) AMENDED BY THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 27, 2006 AMENDED BY THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 27, 2009 AMENDED BY THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 22, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. ...INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE NORTHGATE SPECIFIC PLAN ................................................................... 1 1.2 2003 AMENDMENT ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE NORTHGATE SPECIFIC PLAN ....................................................... 2 1.4 GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OF APPLICATION .............................................................................. 4 1.5 GOALS OF THE NORTHGATE SPECIFIC PLAN........................................................................ 4 1.6 SUMMARY OF THE NORTHGATE PLANNING PROPOSAL ................................................... 5 1.6.1 Mixed Use Land Use .......................................................................................................... 5 1.6.2 Neighborhood Shopping and Services Land Use ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Solano County, California and Incorporated Areas Volume 1 of 3
    SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 3 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BENICIA, CITY OF 060368 DIXON, CITY OF 060369 FAIRFIELD, CITY OF 060370 RIO VISTA, CITY OF 060371 SUISUN CITY, CITY OF 060372 VACAVILLE, CITY OF 060373 VALLEJO, CITY OF 060374 SOLANO COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 060631 PRELIMINARY: JANUARY 31, 2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06095CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Select Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross-sections). Former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE B X C X Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. This Preliminary revised FIS report contains only profiles added or revised as part of the restudy. These profiles are presented at a reduced scale to minimize reproduction costs.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.09 Hydrology
    4.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section discusses the existing hydrological setting for the Project site, including regional and local surface water and groundwater characteristics based on available information about the Project, consultation with County staff, review of geotechnical and environmental reports, other published materials, and site reconnaissance. Based on existing hydrologic information, this section identifies potential impacts that could result from the Project, and recommends mitigation measures. IMPACTS EVALUATED IN OTHER SECTIONS The following subjects are related to Hydrology and Water Quality, but are evaluated in another section of this document: • Potential biological impacts to aquatic life in waterways are evaluated in Section 4.4, Biological Resources. SETTING Climate Solano County’s Mediterranean climate is typified by warm dry summers and mild winters. Rainfall distribution is affected substantially by topography with most of the rainfall being concentrated along the western county border over the Vaca Mountain range. Average annual rainfall varies throughout the County from 15 to 40 inches with the greatest amount occurring over the Vaca Mountains, with levels decreasing easterly away from the mountains. The overall mean annual precipitation for the Project site is approximately 17 inches (PRISM 2010). Regional Surface Waters The Project site lies within the San Francisco Bay Area Hydrologic Basin. The San Francisco Bay functions as the drainage outlet for waters of the Central Valley and the greater Bay Area. Freshwater strongly influences environmental conditions in the San Francisco Bay Estuary. Over 90 percent of the estuary’s freshwater originates from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and enters the northern reach (RWQCB 2007).
    [Show full text]