Introduction to American Government Development of the News Business

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to American Government Development of the News Business Development of the News Business The news media are the organizations that: •Gather • Package • Transmit the news through some proprietary communications Introduction to American Government technology. April 21, 2009 Developed primarily as private POLS 1101 business enterprises The University of Georgia uncontrolled by Prof. Anthony Madonna government. [email protected] Development of the News Business Early Papers • Colonial times. • Profit motive. – Publishing extremely expensive task. – High unit costs – the costs of transmitting a news product to each • But also suppliers of vital civic information. consumer. – Competition to increase audiences • Printing process. for their news. – Time-consuming, labor intensive – Mid-1770s approximately twenty-five weekly newspapers were serving the colonies. • However, the news media have undergone • Pamphlet -- most popular means of communicating. vast changes over time. – Thomas Paine’s Common Sense. – Durable, reusable. 1 Early Papers Early Papers • With the emergence of the Federalist and Democratic- Republican Parties in the 1790s, commercial concerns directed newspapers toward party politics. • Parties launched newspapers wherever they competed in order to advance their particular vision for the Republic. – Little objective reporting. – Required subsidies from parties to maintain themselves. – But also required audiences to justify the party’s support. Andrew Jackson’s administration (1829-1837). • Parties used these newspapers to: – Three journalists in his cabinet. – Advocate their platforms and candidates. – Jackson had close relationship with the editor of the Washington Globe. – Attack their opposition. •Gave Globe government printing contracts. • Appointed fifty-seven editors to patronage positions. – But changeable fortunes of parties in election years provided a poor foundation for building a business. The Rise of the Penny Press The Rise of the Penny Press • A larger audience was the main alternative to relying on a party subsidy. • Businesses had an incentive to reach a mass audience (not just the party faithful). • Market size depended on price (and that depended on unit price). • With the combination of steam power and better presses, • Success of the “penny press” related to the price, but just as much to economies of scale were finally achieved. the shift in what was considered “news.” –The New York Sun was the first paper to enlist the new – Human interest stories, crime, the weather, business, social events. technology. – Political news was covered less, and in a muted fashion, as publishers sought to appeal to as broad an audience as possible. – New York Herald sold for a penny (others still sold 6- – Competition for a mass readership became more intense. cent limited editions. 2 The Golden Age of Newspapers The Emergence of Radio and Television In many ways the period between 1883 and 1925 was the golden age of • Enter radio and television and exit the glory days of the newspapers. newspaper. – They basically held a monopoly over communication. • In 1920 Westinghouse launched the nation’s first – National political news proceeded commercial radio station. through their pages or not at all. – KDKA, Pittsburgh. – Their monopolies centralized their – Soon there were hundreds across the nation. editorial power. • Initially had little to do with civic affairs. Over the past half-century the extensive power of newspapers has eroded substantially. • Brief announcements of the news. – Go to newspapers for the “whole story.” Declining circulation figures. – Soon radio began to take advertising dollars away from Substitution of radio and television. newspapers. The Emergence of Radio and Television Regulation • Television, as an industry, did not emerge until twenty-five years later, • Rapid development of broadcast infrastructure. at the close of World War II. – Locally owned stations affiliated with one of three • Once a station was established (and national networks. consumers paid the initial high cost of – Each major market also had an affiliate of the national a radio or TV set) the cost of delivering news was relatively low public television network and one or two independent (the cost of receiving it nil). stations. – And it was fast. – Instant news, no delay, more – Essentially an oligopoly in terms of production and immediacy. distribution. • This was very undemocratic. What if the few who • Today, radio remains a significant but secondary source of news. controlled the output decided to influence elections? – Talk radio format. • Regulator apparatus was in place already. 3 Regulation News as a Consumer Product • Equal time rules prevented broadcasters from favoring one • Unlimited news programming has not yielded a candidate over another with free or easier access to the better-informed citizenry. airwaves. • Content. •The fairness doctrine sought to assure that different points of – Determined by targeted audience. view on controversial issues had access to the airwaves. • National or local. • Currently, the law also limits a company’s ownership to no – Also determined by carrying capacity. • Amount of information a particular more than 39 percent of the national television audience. technology can economically provide its – 2004 Viacom and News Corp. audience. – Focus on the “median” viewer. • Kept them from expanding beyond 39 percent, while not – Credibility. forcing them to divest their current holdings. • Offers primary data, sound, and video • FCC disallows cross-ownership of newspapers and local images straight from the source. television stations. Consumer Preferences Consumer Preferences • Public likes to have multiple sources of news. • Infotainment programming: – Access to several news providers makes consumers less a blend of news and vulnerable to the bias that producers might introduce in entertainments, such as talk selecting and reporting news. shows, political comedy and – But public less inclined to worry about bias as much as even MTV shows up in convenience. surveys as a source of political information. – Television dominates and is the preferred source for news. – Drift of consumers from newspaper to television • Is infotainment a good thing? appears unlikely to stop. – Internet, however, may erode television’s predominance. • Change reflects changing composition of the news audience. 4 Newsmakers: Politicians and Public Officials Newsmakers: Politicians and Public Officials • When politicians engage in • Press secretary. news making they are trying to influence the course of political events. – Job is to generate favorable news about • Reporters must keep a keen eye on their audience’s interest the officeholder. in the proposed story. • Interaction of politicians and reporters. – President’s press – Different goals. secretary has the – Tension between reciprocity and competition. biggest job of all. • Politicians and public officials participate in news making with two audiences in mind: • The public and fellow politicians. • Usually the means to communicate with fellow politicians and evoke a response. Newsmakers: Politicians and Public Officials Newsmakers: Politicians and Public Officials • Trial balloon. • News leak. – Discreet news-making strategy. – News strategy: politician – Giving strategically consequential “floats” a policy or some information to the news media on the other idea with a reporter on condition that its source not be the condition that the source identified by name. of the story remain • Can provoke action. anonymous. – “Deep Throat” and Watergate. – If it gets a favorable – Mark Felt, second in command at the response, the politician then FBI, leaked information to Washington publicly announces the Post reporters Woodward and Bernstein. proposal. – Inoculating leak -- Kenneth Star and Clinton sex scandal. 5 Newsmakers: The Military Reporters and their News Agencies • Advantage if military can control news. • The role of the reporter is so pivotal to making news that a • Today, it is difficult for the military of a democratic professional creed has grown up around the job. country to control the news. – Contemporary war coverage. • Reporters make the initial decisions about a story’s • Hundreds of journalists (print and broadcast) newsworthiness: define its context/framework. covering the action. • Unescorted and unconfined. • They may even take on the role of the story’s advocate -- • Satellite phones, video transmission backpacks. attempt to sell it to the editors. • 24-hour cable news. – All work to bring the war directly to the public. • Pressure on reporters today: – Military respond with media strategy. – Feed the monster. The Beat Implications from the Beat System • Both newspapers and broadcast • Beats encourage daily reporting media cover the regular sources of (whether it is news or not). important stories systematically by permanently assigning reporters to certain venues, • Those agencies of government that traditionally called beats. are not on a beat are less likely to generate news. The White House, Supreme Court, State Department, • The beat system encourages pack Congress, and so on. journalism, which increases the likelihood of similarity in news coverage across media outlets. 6 Politicians and Reporters The Numbers Game • Politicians and reporters. - Tension in their relationship. • How many individuals have access to key - If they could, each side would exploit the other. information is important to reporters and - Classic prisoner’s dilemma. politicians. “The fact that we didn't do the
Recommended publications
  • Case 1:13-Cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15
    Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. No. 13-cv-03994 (WHP) JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, in his ECF CASE official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; CHARLES T. HAGEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; and ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 18 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Of counsel: Michael D. Steger Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie Steger Krane LLP Rob Tricchinelli 1601 Broadway, 12th Floor The Reporters Committee New York, NY 10019 for Freedom of the Press (212) 736-6800 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 [email protected] Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 807-2100 Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ....................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT…………………………………………………………………1 ARGUMENT……………………………………………………………………………………2 I. The integrity of a confidential reporter-source relationship is critical to producing good journalism, and mass telephone call tracking compromises that relationship to the detriment of the public interest……………………………………….2 A There is a long history of journalists breaking significant stories by relying on information from confidential sources…………………………….4 B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Public Accountability Defense for National Security Leakers and Whistleblowers
    A Public Accountability Defense For National Security Leakers and Whistleblowers The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Yochai Benkler, A Public Accountability Defense For National Security Leakers and Whistleblowers, 8 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 281 (2014). Published Version http://www3.law.harvard.edu/journals/hlpr/files/2014/08/ HLP203.pdf Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12786017 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP A Public Accountability Defense for National Security Leakers and Whistleblowers Yochai Benkler* In June 2013 Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Barton Gellman be- gan to publish stories in The Guardian and The Washington Post based on arguably the most significant national security leak in American history.1 By leaking a large cache of classified documents to these reporters, Edward Snowden launched the most extensive public reassessment of surveillance practices by the American security establishment since the mid-1970s.2 Within six months, nineteen bills had been introduced in Congress to sub- stantially reform the National Security Agency’s (“NSA”) bulk collection program and its oversight process;3 a federal judge had held that one of the major disclosed programs violated the
    [Show full text]
  • New Yorker Launches Online Anonymous Tip System 15 May 2013
    New Yorker launches online anonymous tip system 15 May 2013 will be open-source, and we are very glad to be the first to bring it out into the world, fully implemented." Swartz, an activist who committed suicide in January as he faced a potential prison sentence for breaking into a university research database, developed the system with Kevin Poulsen, a former hacker who is now an editor at Wired magazine. The New Yorker said the system was designed to avoid putting media organizations at the center of investigations of news leaks. "Readers and sources have long sent documents to the magazine and its reporters, from letters of complaint to classified papers," Davidson said. The New Yorker magazine is diplayed in an Upper East Side newstand in New York on October 9, 2012. The "But, over the years, it's also become easier to New Yorker magazine on Wednesday unveiled a new trace the senders... Strongbox addresses that; as online system for anonymous whistleblower tips, based it's set up, even we won't be able to figure out on technology developed by the late Internet activist where files sent to us come from. If anyone asks Aaron Swartz and a former hacker. us, we won't be able to tell them." The system aims to encourage the anonymous submission of newsworthy information, in the The New Yorker magazine on Wednesday manner of WikiLeaks and other Internet sites. unveiled a new online system for anonymous whistleblower tips, based on technology developed The Wall Street Journal set up its own tip system in by the late Internet activist Aaron Swartz and a May 2011 called SafeHouse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lincoln Humanities Journal Panopticon: Surveillance
    LHJ The Lincoln Humanities Journal Fall 2016 | Volume 4 Panopticon: Surveillance, Suspicion, Fear Editor ABBES MAAZAOUI Annual publication of the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, Lincoln University of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved. ISSN 2474-7726 (print) ISSN 2474-7726 (online) 4 The Lincoln Humanities Journal (LHJ) The Lincoln Humanities Journal, ISSN 2474-7726 (print), ISSN 2474-7726 (online), is an interdisciplinary double blind peer-reviewed journal published once a year by the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences of Lincoln University of Pennsylvania. Its main objective is to promote interdisciplinary studies by providing an intellectual platform for international scholars to exchange ideas and perspectives. Each volume is focused on a pre- selected theme in the fields of arts, humanities, the social sciences, and contemporary culture. Preference is given to topics of general interest that lend themselves to an interdisciplinary approach. Manuscripts should conform to the MLA style. Submissions may be made by e-mail to the editor at [email protected]. The preferred language is English. The journal is published both online and in print, in November-December of each year. Editor ABBES MAAZAOUI Lincoln University Editorial Board J. KENNETH VAN DOVER Lincoln University ERIK LIDDELL Eastern Kentucky University KIRSTEN C. KUNKLE Scholar & Opera Singer HÉDI JAOUAD Skidmore College EZRA S. ENGLING Eastern Kentucky University JEAN LEVASSEUR Bishop’s University, Canada The Lincoln Humanities Journal 5 TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Anonymous Javascript Cryptography and Cover Traffic in Whistleblowing Applications
    DEGREE PROJECT IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2016 Anonymous Javascript Cryptography and Cover Traffic in Whistleblowing Applications JOAKIM UDDHOLM KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMMUNICATION Anonymous Javascript Cryptography and Cover Traffic in Whistleblowing Applications JOAKIM HJALMARSSON UDDHOLM Master’s Thesis at NADA Supervisor: Sonja Buchegger, Daniel Bosk Examiner: Johan Håstad Abstract In recent years, whistleblowing has lead to big headlines around the world. This thesis looks at whistleblower systems, which are systems specifically created for whistleblowers to submit tips anonymously. The problem is how to engineer such a system as to maximize the anonymity for the whistleblower whilst at the same time remain usable. The thesis evaluates existing implementations for the whistle- blowing problem. Eleven Swedish newspapers are evaluated for potential threats against their whistleblowing service. I suggest a new system that tries to improve on existing sys- tems. New features includes the introduction of JavaScript cryp- tography to lessen the reliance of trust for a hosted server. Use of anonymous encryption and cover traffic to partially anonymize the recipient, size and timing metadata on submissions sent by the whistleblowers. I explore the implementations of these fea- tures and the viability to address threats against JavaScript in- tegrity by use of cover traffic. The results show that JavaScript encrypted submissions are viable. The tamper detection system can provide some integrity for the JavaScript client. Cover traffic for the initial submissions to the journalists was also shown to be feasible. However, cover traffic for replies sent back-and-forth between whistleblower and journalist consumed too much data transfer and was too slow to be useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Diplomacy: the Negotiator's Dilemma
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1990-12 Media diplomacy: the negotiator's dilemma Howell, Abigail S. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/27601 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA DTQ ===== MARO0, igzrm+ THESIS MEDIA DIPLOMACY: THE NEGOTIATOR'S DILEMMA BY ABIGAIL S. HOWELL DECEMBER 1990 Thesis Advisor: R. MITCHELL BROWN III Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 92-05046 92 2 26052'| ', SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 la REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION lb RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS UNCLASSIFIED 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3 DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY OF REPORT Approved for public release; 2b. DECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE Distribution ig unlimiteA. 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 6. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION N~va' Postgraduate School I(If applicable) 38 Naval Postgraduate School 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) Monterey, CA 93943-5000 Monterey, CA 93943-5000 8a. NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING .. 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9 PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ORGANIZATION (If applicable) 8c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNIT ELEMENT NO NO NO ACCESSION NO 11. TITLE (Include Security Classification) MEDIA DIPLOMACY: THE NEGOTIATOR'S DILEMMA 12 PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) Howell, Abigail S. 13a TYPE OF REPORT 13b TIME COVERED 14 DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) 15 PAGE COUNT Master's Thesis I FROM TO December 1990 241 16 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Whistleblowing Software
    U4 Helpdesk Answer Overview of whistleblowing software Author: Matthew Jenkins, Transparency International, [email protected] Reviewers: Marie Terracol, Transparency International and Saul Mullard, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre Date: 14 April 2020 The technical demands of setting up a secure and anonymous whistleblowing mechanism can seem daunting. Yet public sector organisations such as anti-corruption agencies do not need to develop their own system from scratch; there are a number of both open-source and proprietary providers of digital whistleblowing platforms that can be deployed by public agencies. This Helpdesk answer lays out the core principles and practical considerations for online reporting systems, as well as the chief digital threats they face and how various providers’ solutions respond to these threats. Overall, the paper has identified that open source solutions tend to offer the greatest security for whistleblowers themselves, while the propriety software on the market places greater emphasis on usability and integrated case management functionalities. Ultimately, organisations looking to adopt web-based whistleblowing systems should be mindful of the broader whistleblowing context, such as the legal protections for whistleblowers and the severity of physical and digital threats, as well as their own organisational capacity. U4 Anti-Corruption Helpdesk A free service for staff from U4 partner agencies Query Please provide an overview of the most common web-based whistleblower systems, exploring their respective advantages and disadvantages in terms of anonymity, security, accessibility, costs and so on. We are particularly interested in systems that would be appropriate for Anti-Corruption Agencies. Contents Main points 1. Background a. Advantages of digital reporting — Whistleblowing can act as a crucial systems check on human rights abuses, b.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress's Right to Counsel in Intelligence Oversight
    CLARK.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 4/25/2011 3:05 PM CONGRESS’S RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT Kathleen Clark* This Article examines Congress’s ability to consult its lawyers and other expert staff in conducting oversight. For decades, congres- sional leaders have acquiesced in the executive branch’s insistence that certain intelligence information not be shared with congressional staffers, even those staffers who have high-level security clearances. As a result, Congress has been hobbled in its ability to understand and analyze key executive branch programs. This policy became par- ticularly controversial in connection with the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program. Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Jay Rockefeller noted the “profound oversight issues” im- plicated by the surveillance program and lamented the fact that he felt constrained not to consult the committee’s staff, including its counsel. This Article puts this issue into the larger context of Congress’s right to access national security-related information and discusses congres- sional mechanisms for protecting the confidentiality of that informa- tion. The Article also provides a comprehensive history of congres- sional disclosures of national security-related information. History suggests that the foremost danger to confidentiality lies with disclo- sure to members of Congress, not to staff. The Article identifies sev- eral constitutional arguments for Congress’s right to share informa- tion with its lawyers and other expert staff, and explores
    [Show full text]
  • Tesi Di Diploma Di Mediatore Linguistico
    ! SCUOLA SUPERIORE PER MEDIATORI LINGUISTICI (Decreto Ministero dell’Università 31/07/2003) Via P. S. Mancini, 2 – 00196 - Roma TESI DI DIPLOMA DI MEDIATORE LINGUISTICO (Curriculum Interprete e Traduttore) Equipollente ai Diplomi di Laurea rilasciati dalle Università al termine dei Corsi afferenti alla classe delle LAUREE UNIVERSITARIE IN SCIENZE DELLA MEDIAZIONE LINGUISTICA CASO SNOWDEN: IL DATAGATE RELATORI: CORRELATORI: Prof.ssa Bisirri Adriana Prof.re Farrell Paul Nicholas Prof.re Medina Delgado Carlos Alberto Prof.ssa Piemonte Claudia CANDIDATA: LUDOVICA MARTINO MATRICOLA: 2347 ANNO ACCADEMICO 2017/2018 1! A mia mamma, mio papà e mio fratello Tommaso che credono sempre in me e mi danno fiducia. Ad Alessia sorella e complice nelle difficoltà. Alle mie amiche di una vita Beatrice e Flavia, certezze inesauribili. A mia nonna Teresa luce della mia vita. Vi voglio bene. 2! 3! INDICE SEZIONE ITALIANA Introduzione…………………………………………………..………10 CAPITOLO I: Chi è Edward Snowden…………………………….…..13 CAPITOLO II: La NSA…………………………………………..……17 2.1 Il quarto emendamento……………………………………20 CAPITOLO III: Quali informazioni ha divulgato……………………..21 3.1 PRISM………………….……….…………………………22 3.1.1 Contenuti e metadati…………………………….25 3.2 Caso VERIZON……….……….…………………………..26 3.2.1 Patriot Act …………..…………………………..26 3.3 Boundless Informant….……………….…………………..27 3.4 Tempora……………….……………………………………28 3.4.1 Upstream………..……………………………….29 3.5 Xkeyscore………………………………………………….30 3.6 Blarney………..….………………………………………..31 CAPITOLO IV: Chi l’aveva già fatto prima di lui……………………..33 4.1 Wikileaks:
    [Show full text]
  • ABC Amber Text Converter
    ABC Amber ePub Converter Trial version, http://www.processtext.com/abcepub.html Page 1 ABC Amber ePub Converter Trial version, http://www.processtext.com/abcepub.html Simon & Schuster 1230 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 www.SimonandSchuster.com Copyright © 2010 by Bob Woodward All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever. For information address Simon & Schuster Subsidiary Rights Department, 1230 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition September 2010 SIMON & SCHUSTER and colophon are registered trademarks of Simon & Schuster, Inc. For information about special discounts for bulk purchases, please contact Simon & Schuster Special Sales at 1-866-506-1949 or [email protected]. The Simon & Schuster Speakers Bureau can bring authors to your live event. For more information or to book an event, contact the Simon & Schuster Speakers Bureau at 1-866-248-3049 or visit our website at www.simonspeakers.com. Designed by Paul Dippolito Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. ISBN 978-1-4391-7249-0 ISBN 978-1-4391-7251-3 (ebook) Page 2 ABC Amber ePub Converter Trial version, http://www.processtext.com/abcepub.html CONTENTS Author’s Personal Note Note to Readers Cast of Characters Chapters 1–33 Glossary President Obama’s Final Orders, November 29, 2009 Chapter Notes Acknowledgments Photography Credits Index Page 3 ABC Amber ePub Converter Trial version, http://www.processtext.com/abcepub.html AUTHOR’S PERSONAL NOTE I had two of the most exceptional people assist me full-time on the reporting, writing, editing and thinking about this book: Josh Boak, a 2001 cum laude graduate of Princeton and later of the Columbia University master’s program in journalism, came to work after reporting at The Blade in Toledo, Ohio, and the Chicago Tribune.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. No. 13-cv-03994 (WHP) JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, in his ECF CASE official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; CHARLES T. HAGEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; and ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 18 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Of counsel: Michael D. Steger Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie Steger Krane LLP Rob Tricchinelli 1601 Broadway, 12th Floor The Reporters Committee New York, NY 10019 for Freedom of the Press (212) 736-6800 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 [email protected] Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 807-2100 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ....................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT…………………………………………………………………1 ARGUMENT……………………………………………………………………………………2 I. The integrity of a confidential reporter-source relationship is critical to producing good journalism, and mass telephone call tracking compromises that relationship to the detriment of the public interest……………………………………….2 A There is a long history of journalists breaking significant stories by relying on information from confidential sources…………………………….4 B.
    [Show full text]
  • No More Sources? the Impact of Snowden's Revelations on Journalists and Their Confidential Sources
    No more sources? The impact of Snowden©s revelations on journalists and their confidential sources Article (Accepted Version) Lashmar, Paul (2017) No more sources? The impact of Snowden's revelations on journalists and their confidential sources. Journalism Practice, 11 (6). pp. 665-688. ISSN 1751-2786 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/60524/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk No more sources? The impact of Snowden's revelations on journalists and their confidential sources.
    [Show full text]