DOCSLIB.ORG

Women's Rights in Theory and Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Division of United States Studies Women’s Rights in Theory and Practice Employment, Violence and Poverty Division of United States Studies Women’s Rights in Theory and Practice Employment, Violence and Poverty Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Washington, D.C. May 21–22, 2002 ©2002 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS LEE H. HAMILTON, DIRECTOR BOARD OF TRUSTEES Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair; Steven Alan Bennett, Vice Chair. Public Members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; John W. Carlin, Archivist of the United States; Bruce Cole, Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities; Roderick R. Paige, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education; Colin L. Powell, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Private Citizen Members: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., Carol Cartwright, Jean L. Hennessey, Daniel L. Lamaute, Doris O. Matsui, Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin WILSON COUNCIL Steven Kotler, President. Diane Aboulafia-D'Jaen, Charles S. Ackerman, B.B. Andersen, Cyrus A. Ansary, Charles F. Barber, Lawrence E. Bathgate II, John Beinecke, Joseph C. Bell, A. Oakley Brooks, Melva Bucksbaum, Charles W. Burson, Conrad Cafritz, Nicola L. Caiola, Raoul L. Carroll, Scott Carter, Albert V. Casey, Mark Chandler, Peter B. Clark, William T. Coleman, Jr., Michael D. DiGiacomo, Sheldon Drobny, F. Samuel Eberts III, J. David Eller, Mark Epstein, Sim Farar, Susan Farber, Joseph H. Flom, Charles Fox, Barbara Hackman Franklin, Norman Freidkin, Morton Funger, Gregory M. Gallo, Chris G. Gardiner, Eric Garfinkel, Bruce S. Gelb, Steven J. Gilbert, Alma Gildenhorn, David F. Girard-diCarlo, Michael B. Goldberg, William E. Grayson, Raymond A. Guenter, Gerald T. Halpin, Edward L. Hardin, Jr., Carla A. Hills, Eric Hotung, John L. Howard, Darrell E. Issa, Jerry Jasinowski, Brenda LaGrange Johnson, Shelly Kamins, Edward W. Kelley, Jr., Anastasia D. Kelly, Christopher J. Kennan, Michael V. Kostiw, William H. Kremer, Raymond Learsy, Abbe Lane Leff, Perry Leff, Dennis LeVett, Francine Levinson, Harold O. Levy, David Link, Frederic V. Malek, David S. Mandel, John P. Manning, Jeffrey A. Marcus, Edwin S. Marks, Jay Mazur, Robert McCarthy, Linda McCausland, Stephen G. McConahey, Donald F. McLellan, J. Kenneth Menges, Jr., Philip Merrill, Jeremiah L. Murphy, Martha T. Muse, Della Newman, John E. Osborn, Paul Hae Park, Gerald L. Parsky, Michael J. Polenske, Donald Robert Quartel, Jr., J. John L. Richardson, Margaret Milner Richardson, Larry D. Richman, Edwin Robbins, Robert G. Rogers, Otto Ruesch, B. Francis Saul, III, Alan Schwartz, Timothy R. Scully, J. Michael Shepherd, George P. Shultz, Raja W. Sidawi, Debbie Siebert, Thomas L. Siebert, Kenneth Siegel, Ron Silver, William A. Slaughter, James H. Small, Thomas F. Stephenson, Norma Kline Tiefel, Mark C. Treanor, Christine M. Warnke, Ruth Westheimer, Pete Wilson, Deborah Wince-Smith, Herbert S. Winokur, Jr., Paul Martin Wolff, Joseph Zappala, Richard S. Ziman ABOUT THE CENTER The Center is the living memorial of the United States of America to the nation’s twenty-eighth pres- ident, Woodrow Wilson. Congress established the Woodrow Wilson Center in 1968 as an interna- tional institute for advanced study, “symbolizing and strengthening the fruitful relationship between the world of learning and the world of public affairs.” The Center opened in 1970 under its own board of trustees. In all its activities the Woodrow Wilson Center is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, support- ed financially by annual appropriations from Congress, and by the contributions of foundations, cor- porations, and individuals. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publications and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. WOODROW WILSON CENTER SPECIAL REPORT Contents Introduction 1 Philippa Strum Session One: Litigating for Gender Equality, 1970s – 1990s 4 Ruth Bader Ginsburg, “Litigating for Gender Equality in the 1970s” Marcia Greenberger, “Litigating for Gender Equality in the 1980s” Michael Maurer, “Litigating for Gender Equality in the 1990s” Discussion Session Two: Employment 21 Sheila Thomas Judy Lichtman Wendy Williams Jim Williams Discussion Session Three: The Dangers of the New Federalism; 34 the Possibilities in International Human Rights Law Isabelle Katz Pinzler, “The Dangers of the New Federalism” Rhonda Copelon, “The Possibilities in International Human Rights Law” Discussion Session Four:Violence Against Women 47 Leslye Orloff Elizabeth Schneider Sally Goldfarb Donna Coker Beth Richie Discussion Session Five: Poverty and Welfare 68 Dorothy Roberts Duffy Campbell Lenora Lapidus Martha Davis Discussion Appendix I: State Constitutional Provisions Relating to Welfare 88 Appendix II: Participants 99 WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE iii Acknowledgements This conference was supported by grants from THE FORD FOUNDATION THE OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE AND THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS PLANNING COMMITTEE Rosio Cordoba, ACLU Foundation of Southern California Adrienne Dale Davis, University of North Carolina Evelyn Nakano Glenn, University of California-Berkeley Lenora Lapidus, ACLU Women’s Rights Project Isabelle Katz Pinzler, Project on Federalism, NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund Dorothy Roberts, Northwestern University Elizabeth Schneider, Brooklyn Law School Philippa Strum, Woodrow Wilson Center iv WOODROW WILSON CENTER SPECIAL REPORT Introduction Philippa Strum Division of U.S. Studies n the late 1960s and early 1970s, proponents of gender equality began thinking creatively about how to redefine the legal sphere so as to use I it as a tool in eliminating gender discrimination. One aid in this endeavor was an annual National Conference on Women and the Law (1970-1992), which students at a number of law schools organized to articulate the problem and consider the kind of public policies that might address it. The academics contributed their theoretical analyses; the practi- tioners assessed the theories’ utility as aids to policy-making. Many of the ideas behind both the early work in feminist jurisprudence and subsequent litigation and policy-making in the area of gender equality were honed at the conferences. Although both public policy and the concerns of equal rights propo- nents continued to develop in the last years of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first, practitioners and scholars organized no similar large-scale thinking and strategizing sessions. Many among the new generation of academics working in the gender equality field, some with- out any background in practice, lack the same kind of ties to practitioners - who in turn are cut off from much stimulating new thinking among scholars. The Division of U.S. Studies therefore decided to bring feminist scholars together with attorneys from organizations such as the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, the National Women’s Law Center, Equal Rights Advocates, NOW LDEF, the National Partnership for Women & Families, the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, the Mexican- American LDEF, and the National Employment Law Project. The purpose of the conference was to foster communication between academics and practitioners, thereby enriching scholarship and giving liti- Philippa Strum is director of the Division of U.S. Studies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The con- ference could not have taken place without the fine work of Susan Nugent, the Division’s Program Assistant. Program Associate Danielle Tarantolo provided major editing and organizational assistance in getting this publication ready for print. Both Susan Nugent and Division intern Aidan Smith furnished invaluable editing and proofreading aid. As with all of the Division’s publications, the credit for publication design goes to Derek Lawlor of the Center’s Outreach and Communications Department. WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE 1 gators both ideas for courtroom strategies and a network of scholars upon whom to call in the future. A planning committee of scholars and activists decided that the conference should concentrate on three major areas: employment, violence against women, and poverty and welfare. An addi- tional session on the problems for gender equality litigation created by the New Federalism and the promises inherent in international human rights concepts and instruments, which cut across the three major areas, was included. Given the lessons that can be learned from the past, presentations were also scheduled on the litigation that was done during the last three decades of the twentieth century. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg graciously agreed to speak about her pioneering litigation before that Court during her days as an advocate. The proceedings of the conference are printed in the pages that follow. A number of themes run through much of the discussion. One is the con- tinuing necessity for scholars and activists to work across fields. Conference participants referred frequently during and after the sessions, for example, to the importance of having people who work in the area of welfare listen to people whose expertise lies in the domestic violence field, and vice versa, and of having specialists in both those areas
Recommended publications
  • Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012

    Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012

    Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House).
  • 19Th Amendment Conference | CLE Materials

    19Th Amendment Conference | CLE Materials

    The 19th Amendment at 100: From the Vote to Gender Equality Center for Constitutional Law at The University of Akron School of Law Friday, Sept. 20, 2019 CONTINUING EDUCATION MATERIALS More information about the Center for Con Law at Akron available on the Center website, https://www.uakron.edu/law/ccl/ and on Twitter @conlawcenter 001 Table of Contents Page Conference Program Schedule 3 Awakening and Advocacy for Women’s Suffrage Tracy Thomas, More Than the Vote: The 19th Amendment as Proxy for Gender Equality 5 Richard H. Chused, The Temperance Movement’s Impact on Adoption of Women’s Suffrage 28 Nicole B. Godfrey, Suffragist Prisoners and the Importance of Protecting Prisoner Protests 53 Amending the Constitution Ann D. Gordon, Many Pathways to Suffrage, Other Than the 19th Amendment 74 Paula A. Monopoli, The Legal and Constitutional Development of the Nineteenth Amendment in the Decade Following Ratification 87 Keynote: Ellen Carol DuBois, The Afterstory of the Nineteth Amendment, Outline 96 Extensions and Applications of the Nineteenth Amendment Cornelia Weiss The 19th Amendment and the U.S. “Women’s Emancipation” Policy in Post-World War II Occupied Japan: Going Beyond Suffrage 97 Constitutional Meaning of the Nineteenth Amendment Jill Elaine Hasday, Fights for Rights: How Forgetting and Denying Women’s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality 131 Michael Gentithes, Felony Disenfranchisement & the Nineteenth Amendment 196 Mae C. Quinn, Caridad Dominguez, Chelsea Omega, Abrafi Osei-Kofi & Carlye Owens, Youth Suffrage in the United States: Modern Movement Intersections, Connections, and the Constitution 205 002 THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AT AKRON th The 19 Amendment at 100: From the Vote to Gender Equality Friday, September 20, 2019 (8am to 5pm) The University of Akron School of Law (Brennan Courtroom 180) The focus of the 2019 conference is the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment.
  • The President's Commission on the Celebration of Women in American

    The President's Commission on the Celebration of Women in American

    The President’s Commission on Susan B. Elizabeth the Celebration of Anthony Cady Women in Stanton American History March 1, 1999 Sojourner Lucretia Ida B. Truth Mott Wells “Because we must tell and retell, learn and relearn, these women’s stories, and we must make it our personal mission, in our everyday lives, to pass these stories on to our daughters and sons. Because we cannot—we must not—ever forget that the rights and opportunities we enjoy as women today were not just bestowed upon us by some benevolent ruler. They were fought for, agonized over, marched for, jailed for and even died for by brave and persistent women and men who came before us.... That is one of the great joys and beauties of the American experiment. We are always striving to build and move toward a more perfect union, that we on every occasion keep faith with our founding ideas and translate them into reality.” Hillary Rodham Clinton On the occasion of the 150th Anniversary of the First Women’s Rights Convention Seneca Falls, NY July 16, 1998 Celebrating Women’s History Recommendations to President William Jefferson Clinton from the President’s Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History Commission Co-Chairs: Ann Lewis and Beth Newburger Commission Members: Dr. Johnnetta B. Cole, J. Michael Cook, Dr. Barbara Goldsmith, LaDonna Harris, Gloria Johnson, Dr. Elaine Kim, Dr. Ellen Ochoa, Anna Eleanor Roosevelt, Irene Wurtzel March 1, 1999 Table of Contents Executive Order 13090 ................................................................................1
  • Congressional Record—House H3384

    Congressional Record—House H3384

    H3384 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE April 17, 2018 b 1745 of New York, who have lost a great with the wind. She did what was right, HONORING THE LIFE OF CALLA voice in this Chamber, and those of and it didn’t have to be popular. MEDIG other districts’ iterations that she rep- Bob had a love and passion for poli- resented through the years that she tics as great as his wonderful wife, (Mr. KIHUEN asked and was given served in this remarkable body. Louise. They were such a Washington permission to address the House for 1 We call to mind Don and her Rules couple. Bob would sometimes drive minute and to revise and extend his re- staff. People who were there as com- Louise back and forth from Rochester, marks.) mittee people assisting her in her every New York, to Albany. He was known as Mr. KIHUEN. Mr. Speaker, today I move. We call to mind Liam and her an incredibly thoughtful and brilliant rise to remember the life of Calla crew here in D.C. and at home in the partner who supported Louise tire- Medig. district office, and certainly her family lessly. Going to the Route 91 festival in Las and friends, people who have worked Their activism began with their fight Vegas had become an annual tradition with her through the years. to protect Hart’s Woods in Perinton, for Calla. She would always take time It is a great loss for all of us. just outside of Rochester. Louise would off from her job as a waitress in Ed- Louise did everything with charm.
  • NIEHS and EPA Children's Environmental Health and Disease

    NIEHS and EPA Children's Environmental Health and Disease

    Biographies Dr. Manish Arora Manish Arora is an environmental health dentist. He completed his PhD at the University of Sydney, Australia, and undertook postdoctoral training in Environmental Health at the Harvard School of Public Health. His research focuses on the application of elemental bio- imaging methods to reconstruct prenatal and early childhood metal exposures from deciduous and permanent teeth. He has undertaken animal and human studies where sophisticated analytical techniques (laser ablation, synchrotron and proton probes) have been used to measure the spatial distribution of metals in dental tissues. He is currently applying these techniques to explore the relationship of perinatal manganese and lead exposure with childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes. Dr. Andrea Baccarelli Dr. Baccarelli is the Mark and Catherine Winkler Associate Professor of Environmental Epigenetics in the Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health. Dr. Baccarelli’s research focuses on epigenomics as a unique molecular substrate reflecting the impact of environmental exposures on human health. Epigenetic marks, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, modify chromatin structure and gene expression without changing the underlying DNA sequence. Dr. Baccarelli’s laboratory is dedicated to the investigation of environmental epigenetics at different life-stages. Ongoing projects range from the investigation of the effects of in-utero exposures to toxic metals, second-hand smoking, and psychosocial stress on the methylome of human fetal tissues to the study of the influences of air pollution on non-coding miRNA in adult and elderly individuals. Epigenetic mechanisms are investigated in relation to fetal growth and perinatal outcomes, cardiovascular function, obesity, and neuro-cognition.
  • Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color Author(S): Kimberle Crenshaw Source: Stanford Law Review, Vol

    Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color Author(S): Kimberle Crenshaw Source: Stanford Law Review, Vol

    Stanford Law Review Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color Author(s): Kimberle Crenshaw Source: Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 6 (Jul., 1991), pp. 1241-1299 Published by: Stanford Law Review Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039 Accessed: 21/07/2010 14:45 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=slr. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Stanford Law Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Stanford Law Review. http://www.jstor.org Mappingthe Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color KimberleCrenshaw* INTRODUCTION Over the last two decades, women have organized against the almost routine violence that shapes their lives.1 Drawing from the strength of sharedexperience, women have recognizedthat the political demandsof mil- lions speak more powerfully than the pleas of a few isolated voices.
  • 79Th, Anaheim, CA, August 10-13, 1996)

    79Th, Anaheim, CA, August 10-13, 1996)

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 401 568 CS 215 576 TITLE Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (79th, Anaheim, CA, August 10-13, 1996). Newspaper and Magazine Division. INSTITUTION Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. PUB DATE Aug 96 NOTE 316p.; For other sections of these proceedings, see CS 215 568-580. PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Feminism; *Journalism; *Mass Media Effects; Mass Media Role; *Newspapers; *Periodicals; Popular Culture; Presidential Campaigns (United States); Sex Bias; Victims of Crime IDENTIFIERS Audiotex; *Journalists; Media Bias; *Media Coverage; News Bias; News Sources; Popular Magazines ABSTRACT The Newspaper and Magazine section of the proceedings contains the following 11 papers: "Real-Time Journalism: Instantaneous Change for News Writing" (Karla Aronson and others); "Names in the News: A Study of Journalistic Decision-Making in Regard to the Naming of Crime Victims" (Michelle Johnson); "The Daily Newspaper and Audiotex Personals: A Case Study of Organizational Adoption of Innovation" (Debra Merskin); "What Content Shows about Topic-Team Performance" (John T. Russial); "Have You Heard the News? Newspaper Journalists Consider Audiotex and Other New Media Forms" (Jane B. Singer); "Who Reports the Hard/Soft News? A Study of Differences in Story Assignments to Male and Female Journalists at 'Newsweek'" (Dan Alinanger); "Welcome to Lilliput: The Shrinking of the General Interest in Magazine Publishing" (Erik Ellis); "The Retiring Feminist: Doris E. Fleischman and Doris Fleischman Bernays" (Susan Henry); "'Of Enduring Interest': The First Issue of 'The Readers Digest' as a 'Snapshot' of America in 1922--and its Legacy in a Mass-Market Culture" (Carolyn Kitch); "News Magazine Lead Story Coverage of the 1992 Presidential Campaign" (Mark N.
  • Issue Attention and Agenda Dynamics in Women's Health Care Policy

    Issue Attention and Agenda Dynamics in Women's Health Care Policy

    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Following the Leaders: Issue Attention and Agenda Dynamics in Women’s Health Care Policy Kara Anne Fisher [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Kara Anne, "Following the Leaders: Issue Attention and Agenda Dynamics in Women’s Health Care Policy" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4072. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4072 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Following the Leaders: Issue Attention and Agenda Dynamics in Women’s Health Care Policy Kara Fisher Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Jeff Worsham, Ph.D., Chair John Kilwein, Ph.D. Matthew Jacobsmeier, Ph.D. Simon Haeder, Ph.D.
  • The Global Edge: an Agenda for Chicago’S Future Issues Through Contributions to Opinion and Policy Formation, Leadership Dialogue, and Public Learning

    The Global Edge: an Agenda for Chicago’S Future Issues Through Contributions to Opinion and Policy Formation, Leadership Dialogue, and Public Learning

    The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, is a leading independent, nonpartisan organization committed to influencing the discourse on global Future Chicago’s for An Agenda The Global Edge: issues through contributions to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. The Global Edge: An Agenda for Chicago’s Future Report of an Independent Study Group Michael H. Moskow, Henry H. Perritt, Jr., and Adele Simmons, Cochairs Sponsored by 332 South Michigan Avenue Suite 1100 Chicago, Illinois 60604 thechicagocouncil.org SPINE The Global Edge: An Agenda for Chicago’s Future RepoRt of an Independent Study GRoup Michael H. Moskow, Henry H. Perritt, Jr., and Adele Simmons, Cochairs SponSoRed by The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is a leading independent, nonpartisan organi- zation committed to influencing the discourse on global issues through contributions Study Group Cochairs to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. Michael H. Moskow The Chicago Council provides members, specialized groups, and the general public Senior Fellow for the Global Economy with a forum for the consideration of significant international issues and their bear- ing on American foreign policy. In addition to remaining the premier platform in the The Chicago Council on Global Affairs Midwest for international leaders in foreign policy, The Chicago Council strives to take the lead in gaining recognition for Chicago as an international business center Henry H. Perritt, Jr. for the corporate community and to broaden and deepen the Council’s role in the Professor community. Chicago-Kent College of Law THE CHICAGO COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S.
  • Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2005

    Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2005

    Order Code RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2005 Updated June 21, 2005 Mildred L. Amer Specialist in American National Government Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2005 Summary A record 83 women serve in the 109th Congress: 69 in the House (46 Democrats and 23 Republicans) and 14 in the Senate (9 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Representative Jeanette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943) was the first woman elected to Congress. Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA) was the first woman to serve in the Senate. She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 228 women have served in Congress, 144 Democrats and 84 Republicans. Of these women, 195 have served only in the House; 26 have served only in the Senate; and seven have served in both houses. The figures include one Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Of the 202 women who have served in the House, 36 were elected to fill vacancies caused by the death of their husbands. Fifteen of the 36 were subsequently elected to additional terms. Nineteen women have been elected to fill other vacancies. Edith Nourse Rogers (R-MA), who served in the House for 35 years, holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress. Margaret Chase Smith (R- ME), the first woman elected to the House and Senate, holds the record for Senate service by a woman with 24 years.
  • A Tribute to the Honorable Louise M. Slaughter (1929-2018)

    A Tribute to the Honorable Louise M. Slaughter (1929-2018)

    A Tribute to The Honorable Louise M. Slaughter (1929-2018) Since her sudden passing on March 16, 2018, many people, organizations, leaders, and friends have shared wonderful memories of Louise. Words like “trailblazer,” “indefatigable,” “champion,” “unrelenting,” and “tireless advocate for her constituents and the causes she believed in” are among the descriptions of an amazing leader. House Speaker Paul Ryan called her a “giant.” And she was. She was truly an inspiration. And is forever in our hearts. For Americans for the Arts, Louise was also the most formidable voice and authority on the arts on Capitol Hill. Today, during memorial services in her honor at the U.S. Capitol, Americans for the Arts is humbly honored to take a moment to reflect on her career and service in the U.S. House of Representatives, where for over three decades, she stood as a steadfast advocate and champion for the arts, culture, and arts education. Her work on behalf of the arts in America was exemplary. It was 21 years ago on Arts Advocacy Day 1997, when Louise single-handedly revived the Congressional Arts Caucus to successfully save the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities from being terminated the following year. It was a time of considerable debate over the role of federal funding for the arts. As the stalwart co-chair of the Arts Caucus since its inception, Louise and her Republican co-chairs (Reps. Steve Horn- 1997-2002, Christopher Shays- 2003-2008, Todd Platts- 2009-2012, Leonard Lance- 2013-present) worked together to lead and unify a 161-member caucus to secure federal support for the arts and culture every year.
  • Rep. Louise M. Slaughter

    Rep. Louise M. Slaughter

    Rep. Louise M. Slaughter Ranking Member, House Committee on Rules Representing New York’s 25th District FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT Friday, March 16, 2018 Jeff Gohringer 202-225-2888 Statement on the Passing of Congresswoman Louise M. Slaughter WASHINGTON, DC — Liam Fitzsimmons, chief of staff to Congresswoman Louise M. Slaughter (NY-25), announced that the congresswoman passed away early this morning surrounded by family at George Washington University Hospital after sustaining an injury in her Washington, DC residence last week. Slaughter rose to become the first woman to chair the powerful House Committee on Rules since it was formally constituted on April 2, 1789, and was serving as its ranking member. She was a relentless fighter for families in Monroe County and across the nation, and authored the landmark Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and the Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, among many other accomplishments. Slaughter, 88, was the dean of the New York congressional delegation, serving her 16th term in Congress. “To have met Louise Slaughter is to have known a force of nature. She was a relentless advocate for Western New York whose visionary leadership brought infrastructure upgrades, technology and research investments, and two federal manufacturing institutes to Rochester that will transform the local economy for generations to come. As the first chairwoman of the House Rules Committee, Louise blazed a path that many women continue to follow. It is difficult to find a segment of society that Louise didn’t help shape over the course of more than thirty years in Congress, from health care to genetic nondiscrimination to historic ethics reforms.