DOCSLIB.ORG

Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Revision of Development and Restoration Scheme at Ballidon Quarry, Ballidon, Peak District National Park Report Reference: CE-BQ0776-RP01 - FINAL Produced by Crestwood Environmental Ltd. 3 June 2015 Crestwood Report Reference: CE-BQ0776-RP01 - FINAL: Issued Date Written / Updated by: Checked & Authorised by: Version Status Produced Karl Jones Adam Collinge Draft v1 23-03-2015 (Principal Landscape Architect) (Senior Landscape Architect) Karl Jones Adam Collinge Final 03-06-2015 (Principal Landscape Architect) (Senior Landscape Architect) This report has been prepared in good faith, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, based on information provided or known available at the time of its preparation and within the scope of work agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. The report is provided for the sole use of the named client and is confidential to them and their professional advisors. No responsibility is accepted to others. Crestwood Environmental Ltd. 1 & 2 Nightingale Place Pendeford Business Park Wobaston Road Wolverhampton WV9 5HF Tel: 01902 824 037 Email: [email protected] Web: www.crestwoodenvironmental.co.uk Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Ballidon Quarry – Revised Development and Restoration Scheme CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 KEY WORK ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 OUTLINE METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 4 2 BASELINE SITUATION - LANDSCAPE ASPECTS ............................................................................. 6 2.1 LANDSCAPE POLICY .................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 LANDSCAPE DESIGNATIONS ....................................................................................................... 10 2.3 REGISTERED PARKS AND GARDENS ............................................................................................ 10 2.4 LISTED BUILDINGS, SCHEDULED MONUMENTS AND CONSERVATION AREAS ........................... 10 2.5 HISTORIC LAND-USE AND COVER ............................................................................................... 11 2.6 TREE PRESERVATION ORDERS .................................................................................................... 11 2.7 RIGHTS OF WAY AND OPEN ACCESS LAND ................................................................................. 11 2.8 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ............................................................................................................ 12 2.9 LANDSCAPE VALUE ..................................................................................................................... 18 3 BASELINE SITUATION - VISUAL ASPECTS .................................................................................. 20 3.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 VISIBILITY .................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3 VIEWPOINTS ............................................................................................................................... 21 4 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 22 4.1 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS.............................................................................................. 22 4.2 PREDICTED POTENTIAL IMPACTS ............................................................................................... 23 4.3 IMPACT AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES .................................................................. 23 4.4 EFFECTS ON LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS AND CHARACTER ................................................. 24 4.5 EFFECTS ON VISUAL AMENITY .................................................................................................... 28 4.6 EFFECTS ON OTHER VISUAL RECEPTORS .................................................................................... 40 4.7 SEQUENTIAL CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ......................................................................................... 41 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................... 41 5.1 DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................... 41 5.2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS .............................................................................................. 41 5.3 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 41 LIST OF TABLES: Table 1 Landscape Guidelines .................................................................................................... 15 Table 2 Landscape Value of the Locality .................................................................................... 19 Table 3 Viewpoints (VPs) ........................................................................................................... 21 Table 4 Predicted Potential Impacts .......................................................................................... 23 Table 5 Summary of Assessment of Significance of Landscape Effects ..................................... 28 Table 6 Summary Visual Sensitivity of Receptors at Viewpoints (VPs) ...................................... 30 CE-BQ0776-RP01 - FINAL Page 1 3 June 2015 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Ballidon Quarry – Revised Development and Restoration Scheme LIST OF APPENDICES: APPENDIX 1 METHODOLOGY AND METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 2 FIGURES APPENDIX 3 LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES LIST OF FIGURES IN APPENDIX: Figure L1: Landscape Context Plan Figure L2: Visibility Analysis Plan Figure L3: Viewpoint 1 Figure L4: Viewpoint 2 Figure L5: Viewpoint 3 Figure L6: Viewpoint 4 Figure L7: Viewpoint 5 Figure L8: Viewpoint 6 Figure L9: Viewpoint 6 Photomontage Figure L10: Viewpoint 7 Figure L11: Viewpoint 8 Figure L12: Viewpoint 9 Figure L13: Viewpoint 10 Figure L14: Viewpoint 11 Figure L15: Viewpoint 12 Figure L16: Viewpoint 12 Photomontage CE-BQ0776-RP01 - FINAL Page 2 3 June 2015 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Ballidon Quarry – Revised Development and Restoration Scheme 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.1.1 Crestwood Environmental Ltd (‘Crestwood’), a Registered Practice of the Landscape Institute, were commissioned by Lafarge Tarmac to undertake a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) of proposals to revise the development and restoration scheme (‘the Proposed Development’) at Ballidon Quarry, (‘the Site’). The Site is divided into two main quarry areas (West Quarry and Woodbarn Quarry (shown as Hoe Grange Quarry on OS maps)), linked via a short informal private access road. 1.1.2 The location of the Site and its surrounding context are provided on Figure L1. The Site is located north of the small settlement of Ballidon, Derbyshire and lies within the Peak District National Park. The Site is centred on NGR: SK 20070 55500 and covers an area of circa 67.5 hectares (ha). 1.1.3 A detailed description of the Proposed Development is included in the accompanying planning application. In summary, the Proposed Development consists of: Reduction in height of, and reallocation of mineral waste from, ‘Tip 3’, located near the southern boundary of the Site; and A revised restoration scheme (including revised landform and habitat/land-use and progressive implementation (in six phases). 1.1.4 Specifically, the Proposed Development involves the partial removal of Tip 3 on the Southern Boundary of the quarry and using this material to bury and restore the high faces in the Western Quarry. This will be undertaken over a two year period, and will result in the sterilisation of deeper currently permitted reserves. However the loss of these reserves will be offset by modifying the development scheme to recover reserves previously inaccessible beneath Tip 3. 1.1.5 No increase in reserves will result from the Proposed Development and there will be no change in any of the other operating conditions at the Site. A significantly improved restoration scheme (allowing faces within West Quarry to be restored to a top-to-bottom slope (resembling a steep valley side) will be achieved, along with more sustainable quarry operations. The life of the consent will remain unchanged. 1.2 CONTEXT 1.2.1 Ballidon Quarry has been producing high purity carboniferous limestone since the 1950’s. The quality of the stone is such that it is sold predominantly into industrial markets for use as fillers in paints, plastics, animal feeds, pharmaceuticals and numerous other applications. 1.2.2 The current consent granted in 2004 permits the extraction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Derbyshire Dales Local Plan Post
    Derbyshire Dales Local Plan – Post-Submission Modifications Habitats Regulations Report Prepared on behalf of: Derbyshire Dales District Council Date: June 2017 Prepared by: ClearLead Consulting Limited The Barn, Cadhay, Ottery St Mary, Devon, EX11 1QT, UK 01404 814273 Contract Number: C0018 Contract No: C0018 Issue: 5 Author V Pearson (signature): Project Director J Mitchell (signature): Date: June 2017 Version Control Record Issue Status Date Reviewer Initials Author Initials 1 Draft 21/03/16 JM VP 2 Version for consultation 05/04/16 JM VP 3 Pre Submission Local Plan 22/08/16 JM VP version 4 Submission Local Plan version 13/12/16 JM VP 5 Post-Submission version 21/06/17 JRP VP This report has been prepared by ClearLead Consulting, Limited (ClearLead) with all reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the Client named on the front of this report and is protected by copyright for intellectual property. This report has been prepared at the Client’s instruction and in accordance with the Services and the Terms agreed between ClearLead and the Client. ClearLead accepts no responsibility whatsoever to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known, unless formally agreed by ClearLead beforehand. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. ClearLead disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the Services. Derbyshire Dales Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Table of Contents Glossary..................................................................................................................................... 4 Report Addendum ...................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The need for HRA .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Pi
    local environment agency pi DOVE ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW AUGUST 1999 Ashbourne Dove LEAP Foreword I am delighted to introduce the Consultation Draft for the Dove Local Environment Agency Plan. This is the third LEAP to be produced in the Upper Trent Area of the Midlands Region and looks at environmental issues within the River Dove catchment. The Agency in consultation with key organisations has identified a number of environmental issues relevant to this area. We need to confirm that we have addressed all current issues and the options to resolve them, taking into account the often conflicting demands on the environment by its users. The LEAP process will provide a vision for the environmental needs of the River Dove area. It will provide a framework within which we can seek to develop new partnerships with organisations and bodies with whom we wish to share a common approach on environmental , issues. This report is published as part of our commitment to being open and consulting with others about our work. This will be part of a major consultation exercise and marks the start of a three month period of consultation. Following the consultation period the Agency will produce a five year action plan which will set out a costed programme of work by the Agency and other organisations. Annual reviews over the five year period will report on significant achievements and progress being made on the issues. Your views are extremely important. Only by letting us know your opinions will we be able to make a real difference to your local environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Peak District Dales
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Peak District Dales Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Strategically Important Metals: 29 March 2011
    S&T Committee: Written evidence SIM Strategically important metals: 29 March 2011 SIM Author SIM Author 00 Department for Business, Innovation & 18 Gareth P Hatch Skills 00a Supplementary 01 G R Chapman 19 Design Council 02 Nicholas Morley 20 Minor Metals Trade Association (MMTA) 20a Supplementary 20b Supplementary 03 The Institute of Materials, Minerals and 21 Chatham House Mining (IOM3) 03a Supplementary 04 University of Strathclyde and University 22 The Royal Institution of Chartered of Oxford Surveyors 05 Aerospace and Defence Knowledge Transfer Network, Materials and Structures National Technical Committee (NTC) 06 Wolf Minerals Ltd 07 The Environmental sustainability Knowledge Transfer Network (ESKTN) 07a Supplementary 08 Society of Chemical Industry Materials Chemistry Group 09 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 10 The Geological Society of London 10a Supplementary 11 Natural History Museum 12 Construction Materials Group, Society of Chemical Industry 13 Research Councils UK 14 British Metals Recycling Association 15 British Standards Institution (BSI) 16 The Cobalt Development Institute 17 The Royal Society of Chemistry Written evidence submitted by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (SIM 00) Strategically important metals inquiry 1. Is there a global shortfall in the supply and availability of strategically important metals essential to the production of advanced technology in the UK? 1. The current situation is that whilst there is currently no significant shortage/lack of availability of key metals, the situation could rapidly change. The UK operates in a global market and largely requires the same materials as other developed economies, and as the world economy moves towards high technology and low carbon manufacturing competition for strategic metals and resources in general will increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak District Dales SAC Citation
    EC Directive 92/43 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora Citation for Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Name: Peak District Dales Unitary Authority/County: Derbyshire, Staffordshire SAC status: Designated on 1 April 2005 Grid reference: SK142550 SAC EU code: UK0019859 Area (ha): 2326.33 Component SSSI: Ballidon Dale SSSI, Coombs Dale SSI, Cressbrook Dale SSSI, Dove Valley and Biggin Dale SSSI, Hamps and Manifold Valleys SSSI, Lathkill Dale SSSI, Long Dale and Gratton Dale SSSI, Long Dale, Hartington SSSI, Matlock Woods SSSI, Monks Dale SSSI, The Wye Valley SSSI, Topley Pike and Deep Dale SSSI, Via Gellia Woodlands SSSI Site description: The Carboniferous Limestone massif of the Peak District is one of the most important in Britain, lying in latitude and altitude between the Mendips and the Craven area of Yorkshire. The limestone is cut by valleys, the ‘dales’, which contain a wide range of wildlife habitats, particularly woodland, scrub and grassland. This mosaic of habitats and the transitions between them are of exceptional interest for a wide range of characteristic, rare and uncommon flora and fauna. Peak District Dales includes one of the largest surviving areas in England of sheep’s-fescue – meadow oat-grass (Festuca ovina – Helictotrichon pratense) grassland. Grasslands at this site range from hard-grazed short turf through to tall herb-rich vegetation, with transitions through to calcareous scrub and ash Fraxinus excelsior-dominated woodland. Taken together the ash woods of the ravines and slopes of the Dales comprise one of the largest areas of this habitat in Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Dales SAC ALSE 2015
    Macclesfield Old Road Buxton Assessment of Likely Significant Effects February 2015 Macclesfield Old Road Buxton Assessment of Likely Significant Effects Document Reference: 4984.001 Version 2.0 February 2015 Prepared by: Marj Nadouce MCIEEM TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH Tel: 01925 844004 Fax: 01925 844002 e-mail: [email protected] for Persimmon Homes 30 – 34 Crofts Bank Road Urmston Greater Manchester M41 0UH Written: Checked: Approved: MN LSw LSw Macclesfield Old Road Buxton Assessment of Likely Significant Effects CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 19 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ................................................................. 21 3.0 FEATURES OF INTEREST IN THE RELEVANT EUROPEAN SITES ................ 22 4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 24 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF LIKELY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS .................................... 31 6.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 35 7.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................... 37 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Designated Site Maps, Citations and Registry Entry Forms DRAWINGS G4984.001 Site location, designated sites and surrounding area Doc Ref: 4984.001 February 2015 Version: 2.0 Macclesfield Old Road Buxton Assessment of Likely Significant Effects 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TEP was commissioned by Persimmon Homes
    [Show full text]
  • Working Today for Nature Tomorrow
    Report Number 594 Measuring the minerals industry's contribution to biodiversity English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 594 Measuring the minerals industry’s contribution to biodiversity Part A – Evaluation of techniques in pilot study areas Part B1 – Biodiversity audit – White Peak Part B2 – Biodiversity audit – Northamptonshire Vales Prepared by SLR Consulting on behalf of The Minerals and Nature Conservation Forum, comprising English Nature, The Quarry Products Association and The Silica and Moulding Sands Association You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2004 Foreword This report has been prepared under contract to the Minerals and Nature Conservation Forum. Founded in 1994, the Forum, comprises representatives of aggregate and silica sand producers, through their trade associations, and English Nature. It works to raise awareness and promote action for biodiversity and geodiversity in England’s minerals industry. This report was commissioned by the Forum in recognition of a need to develop a methodology that could be used to assess the overall impact of aggregate/silica sand extraction in any given area. This product would be useful primarily at a strategic planning level, but also in directing more local decisions on quarry location and restoration schemes. Quarrying has by its nature impacted on England’s wildlife and biodiversity. Active quarries can provide habitats for wildlife populations, but in most cases, operational areas are likely to have significantly different and lower wildlife value than the original land.
    [Show full text]
  • Dove Abstraction Licensing Strategy
    Dove Abstraction Licensing Strategy A strategy to manage water resources sustainably February 2021 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment. We help people and wildlife adapt to climate change and reduce its impacts, including flooding, drought, sea level rise and coastal erosion. We improve the quality of our water, land and air by tackling pollution. We work with businesses to help them comply with environmental regulations. A healthy and diverse environment enhances people's lives and contributes to economic growth. We can’t do this alone. We work as part of the Defra group (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs), with the rest of government, local councils, businesses, civil society groups and local communities to create a better place for people and wildlife. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon House, Deanery Road, Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/environment-agency © Environment Agency 2018 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Further copies of this report are available from our ALS publications catalogue: Environment Agency - Abstraction Licensing Strategies (CAMS) or our National Customer Contact Centre: 03708 506 506 Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk 2 of 30 Contents 1. About the licensing strategy ................................................................................................. 4 2. Water resource availability of the Dove ALS ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • High Peak Local Plan Revised Preferred Options Draft Habitats Regulations Assessment Draft Version
    High Peak Local Plan Revised Preferred Options draft Habitats Regulations Assessment Draft version Prepared for: High Peak Borough Council Prepared by: ENVIRON Exeter, UK Date: March 2014 Project or Issue Number: UK18-18153 Contract No: UK18-18153 Issue: 2 Author Charissa Poynton (signature): Project Manager/Director (signature): Lesley Vining Date: 25 March 2014 This report has been prepared by ENVIRON with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the Services and the Terms agreed between ENVIRON and the Client. This report is confidential to the client, and ENVIRON accepts no responsibility whatsoever to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known, unless formally agreed by ENVIRON beforehand. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. ENVIRON disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the Services. Version Control Record Issue Description of Status Date Reviewer Author Initials Initials 1 Draft 28 Feb 2014 LV CYP 2 Final version 25 March 2014 LV VP High Peak Borough Council Draft Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Contents Executive Summary iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 This Report 1 1.2 The need for Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) 1 2 The High Peak Local Plan 3 3 Methodology and European sites 4 3.1 HRA Methodology 4 3.2 The Identified European sites 5 4 The HRA to date 9 4.1 Introduction 9 5 Appropriate Assessment: air quality 11 5.1 Introduction 11 5.2 Background 11 5.3 Peak District Dales SAC 12 5.4
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report
    Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report June 2010 If you would like this leaflet in large print, on audio tape, in Braille or on disk, please contact 0161 474 4395. Stockport LDF: Core Strategy DPD Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report 1 Introduction 1 1 Introduction Authorship This document has been written by a team of experts across the Council and with commentary and input from both the Greater Manchester Ecological Unit and Natural England. The Council employees responsible for writing this document are detailed below, showing their qualification and experience to inform the origin of this document. Main Author: Angie Jukes MSc, BSc, is the Health and Environment Advisor (Planning) to the Planning departments at Stockport Council. This is a non-planner role co-funded by NHS Stockport and the Council to facilitate appraisal and advice on health and environmental issues, delivering sustainability in planning policy. Based within the Planning Policy Team the Health & Environment Advisor assists with policy development through delivery of the various aspects of sustainability appraisal, alongside the emerging policy. Angie has both a BSc and an MSc in environmental subjects, with 10 years experience working across sustainable development sectors including energy, health, sustainability appraisal, sustainable design and construction as well as policy. Associate Author: Emma Wilson BSc, MSc, Emma works as the Nature Development Officer within the Parks, Sport and Recreation Service of Stockport Council. She has worked in this role since 2007 and her duties include development of Local Nature Reserves, providing management advice for Sites of Biological Importance, and also advising the planning department on the impact of developments on protected species and habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex B – Conditions Relating to Licensed Badger Control On
    Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Derbyshire SSSI name European Licence condition Designated Site name (where applicable) Abney & No licensed activities from 1st March to 31st August to avoid bird Bretton breeding season. All vehicles must be restricted to existing Cloughs SSSI tracks. No trapping or driving of vehicles within wetland habitat. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or, if present to areas of dense bracken, Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. Ambergate No additional conditions proposed and Ridgeway Quarries SSSI Bage Mine SSSI No additional conditions proposed Baileycroft No additional conditions proposed Quarry SSSI Ballidon Dale Peak District All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks at all times. Limit SSSI Dales SAC location of traps to existing sett footprint. Bee's Nest and Bee's Nest & All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks at all times. Limit Green Clay Pits Green Clay Pits location of traps to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas SSSI SAC of dense scrub/secondary woodland more than 250 metres from a pond. No trapping or driving of vehicles within wetland habitat. Benty Grange All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of SSSI traps to existing sett footprint. Bonsall Leys All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of SSSI traps to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas of dense scrub/secondary woodland.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Application for Revision to Quarry Development Scheme Within Current Planning Consent Boundary and Provision
    Planning Committee – Part A 11 December 2015 Page 1 9. (A) FULL APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO QUARRY DEVELOPMENT SCHEME WITHIN CURRENT PLANNING CONSENT BOUNDARY AND PROVISION OF ENHANCED RESTORATION SCHEME, BALLIDON QUARRY (NP/DDD/0715/0619, M3893, 31/07/2015, 420192/354944, APB) (B) VARIATION OF CONDITIONS (2, 11, 38, 39) CONTAINED IN PLANNING CONSENT NP/DDD/0214/0210 RELATING TO PERMITTED SCHEME OF WORKING AND PROVIDE ENHANCED RESTORATION SCHEME, BALLIDON QUARRY (NP/DDD/0715/0618, M3893, 31/07/2015, 420192/354944, APB) APPLICANT: LAFARGE-TARMAC (NOW KNOWN AS TARMAC (A CRH COMPANY)) Introduction This report deals with two applications which have been submitted in parallel by the applicant and which have been assessed jointly since they relate to one and the same development. Following procedural advice offered by case officers, the applicant was required to make two separate submissions in order to pursue their intended development, which is the subject of this one report, the first being a full minerals application covering an additional area and revision to the current quarry extraction boundary to accommodate extraction beneath an existing tip (known as Tip 3), and the second being a section 73 application to vary the existing phasing of working and the currently approved restoration scheme, to take account of the increase in on-site waste material generated as a result of removal of material from Tip 3. The report therefore includes two separate recommendations which Members are asked to make a decision on. In practical terms, given the inter-dependent nature of the two applications, if differing resolutions were reached for each application it is highly unlikely that the granted permission would be implemented since the revised phasing and restoration development the subject of the section 73 application could not practically be undertaken in the absence of planning permission granted for the full development varying the extraction boundary.
    [Show full text]