DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Memorandum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Memorandum TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: WWDC DATE: May 12, 2010 FROM: MWH REFERENCE: Wind-Bighorn Basin Plan SUBJECT: Task 6A–Issues Affecting Future Water Use Opportunities This memorandum discusses known environmental processes, permits and other related issues associated with future water use opportunities within the Wind-Bighorn Basin. This memorandum fulfills the reporting requirements for Task 6A of the consultant scope of work for the Wind-Bighorn Basin Plan Update (Basin Plan Update). Contents Section 1 – Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Section 2 –Water Management Issues .................................................................................................. 2 Issues Related to Tribal Compacts and Settlements .......................................................................... 2 Issues Related to Federal Projects ..................................................................................................... 3 Issues Related to Water Quality ......................................................................................................... 3 Section 3– Compact Requirements........................................................................................................ 3 Section 4– Funding Agency Requirements-WWDC ............................................................................... 4 Section 5 – Federal Legislation and Regional Laws ............................................................................... 5 NEPA- The National Environmental Policy Act ................................................................................... 5 Section 404 Permit ............................................................................................................................. 5 ESA - Endangered Species Act .......................................................................................................... 5 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ...................................................................................................... 6 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................. 6 CWA - Clean Water Act ...................................................................................................................... 9 SDWA - Safe Drinking Water Act ....................................................................................................... 9 Agency Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 9 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act ................................................................................................................ 9 Section 6 – Summary............................................................................................................................. 9 Section 7 – References ........................................................................................................................ 10 Appendix A .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix B .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Section 1 – Introduction There are many legal requirements and regulatory and institutional issues that may influence future water management strategies and water use opportunities in the Wind-Bighorn Basin (Basin). These 1 include compact requirements, federal legislation such as the Endangered Species Act, and water quality issues and regulations which pertain to the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act. Water rights administration is also an important issue. Water rights are described in detail in Technical Memorandum 3H—Water Law and Administration. The Wind River Indian Reservation and its associated water rights and regulations are also an important factor for consideration in future water management. The agendas of various groups within the Basin can create water management issues between the groups themselves. For example, there have been conflicts between ranchers, governmental agencies, environmental groups and outdoor recreation groups for several decades. There have been efforts to restrict grazing on public land or to establish minimum stream flows for the purpose of protecting and enhancing fisheries. Also, there have been more stringent limitations on Total Dissolved Solids and Fecal Coliform bacteria concentrations permitted in water bodies. Issues such as these increase the complexity of managing land and water resources within the Basin. Potential future storage and conveyance projects are important for meeting Wyoming’s future water needs. Required permits and regulatory processes that may be associated with future water use opportunities are summarized herein. Section 2 –Water Management Issues Several Basin Advisory Group (BAG) meetings were held during the Basin Plan Update. During these meetings, basin-wide issues and strategies were identified and discussed. A listing of the issues that have been identified to date can be found in Technical Memorandum 3G- BAG Issues. Key issues identified by the BAG include water use, water development, constraints of existing compacts, constraints of Tribal settlements, federal project contract limitations, and water quality issues. These issues are expanded upon in the sections below. Issues Related to Tribal Compacts and Settlements On the Wind River Indian Reservation, Tribal surface water rights are the oldest in the Basin and date back to 1868. Legal proceedings to adjudicate the water within the Bighorn Basin began in 1977 between the State of Wyoming and the Shoshone and Arapaho Tribes. The courts awarded the Tribes the right to a total of 500,000 acre-feet of water from the Wind River system, with approximately 209,000 acre-feet for dedicated future irrigation use within the Reservation. A full description of the legal proceedings and decisions can be found in Technical Memorandum 3H—Water Law and Administration. The State would like to ensure that the Tribes "futures" awards develops in a manner that remains consistent with the court’s interpretation of uses and places of use while minimizing injury to junior water right holders. It would also like to see rehabilitation projects to improve the distribution and efficiency of water delivery to Tribal lands (WWDC 2003). The impact of full development of Tribal reserved water rights is presented in Technical Memorandum 4C – Surface Water Availability. One issue within the Basin that is nearing resolution is the Reserved Water Rights Compact in Montana. The compact allocates a portion of the Bighorn River flow to the Crow Tribe. Litigation concerning water rights of the Crow Tribe on their Montana Reservation began in 1975. In 1985, the United States, the Tribe and the State of Montana entered into negotiations aimed at settling the Tribe's water rights claims. In 1999, the Crow Tribe and the State of Montana reached an agreement on a compact providing for an allocation of water for the Tribe, subordination of that right to existing state based water uses, water rights administration, water marketing, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The federal government did not approve or sign the compact. On September 22, 2009, the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2009 (H.R. 3563) was proposed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The settlement would recognize a Tribal water right to 500,000 acre-feet per year of water from the flow of the Bighorn River, as well as up to 300,000 acre-feet of water per year from Bighorn Lake (150,000 2 acre-feet in all years and an additional 150,000 acre-feet in dry years when natural flow is short). The concession on the part of the Crow Tribe involves “shortage sharing” of their senior natural flow right with non-Indians (Connor 2009). No analysis of the impacts, if any, of the Crow Tribe settlement was performed as part of the Basin Plan Update. Issues Related to Federal Projects Several federal water projects within the Basin are part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Project. There are certain restrictions on how the water stored in the facilities can be obtained and used, which can vary from project to project. Repayment of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program facilities are generally made by irrigation districts, which are typically funded through taxes on the district properties. These taxes help to repay the federal government, which provided funds to build and maintain the facilities. A more complete description of this project and the federal storage reservoirs can be found in Technical Memorandum 3F—Storage. Issues Related to Water Quality The State of Wyoming has empowered the Water Quality Division of the Department of Environmental Quality with the authority to permit and enforce surface water and groundwater standards and regulations throughout the state. The Wind River Indian Reservation has a similar department of environmental quality. State and tribal programs ensure that all new water projects comply with federal water quality regulations. Water quality issues and locations of impaired streams and lakes within the Basin are detailed in Technical Memorandum 6B - Water Quality. Waters are declared “impaired” when they fail to support their designated uses after full
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 5 of the 2020 Antelope, Deer and Elk Regulations
    WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Antelope, 2020 Deer and Elk Hunting Regulations Don't forget your conservation stamp Hunters and anglers must purchase a conservation stamp to hunt and fish in Wyoming. (See page 6) See page 18 for more information. wgfd.wyo.gov Wyoming Hunting Regulations | 1 CONTENTS Access on Lands Enrolled in the Department’s Walk-in Areas Elk or Hunter Management Areas .................................................... 4 Hunt area map ............................................................................. 46 Access Yes Program .......................................................................... 4 Hunting seasons .......................................................................... 47 Age Restrictions ................................................................................. 4 Characteristics ............................................................................. 47 Antelope Special archery seasons.............................................................. 57 Hunt area map ..............................................................................12 Disabled hunter season extension.............................................. 57 Hunting seasons ...........................................................................13 Elk Special Management Permit ................................................. 57 Characteristics ..............................................................................13 Youth elk hunters........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Investigations 2008
    Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Investigations 2008 Report of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team Photo courtesy of Steve Ard Data contained in this report are preliminary and subject to change. Please obtain permission prior to citation. To give credit to authors, please cite the section within this report as a chapter in a book. Below is an example: Moody, D.S., K. Frey, and D. Meints. 2009. Trends in elk hunter numbers within the Primary Conservation Area plus the 10-mile perimeter area. Page 39 in C.C. Schwartz, M.A. Haroldson, and K. West, editors. Yellowstone grizzly bear investigations: annual report of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, 2008. U.S. Geological Survey, Bozeman, Montana, USA. Cover: Female #533 with her 3 3-year-old offspring after den emergence, taken 1 May 2008 by Steve Ard. YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEAR INVESTIGATIONS Annual Report of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team 2008 U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming Game and Fish Department National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks U.S. Forest Service Idaho Department of Fish and Game Edited by Charles C. Schwartz, Mark A. Haroldson, and Karrie West U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 2009 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 This Report ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • V- 447 in STORAGE PROGRESS REPORI' of COYOTE S'iuijy !Iifjyellowstone NATIONAL PARK
    c 1 l <­ V- 447 IN STORAGE PROGRESS REPORI' OF COYOTE S'IUIJY !IifJYELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK by Adolph Murie ;r.3!3 I In a letter dated March 25, 1937, the Regional Officer, Region 2, was requested by the Director to assign me to make a thorough study of the coyote and its relationships to other wildlife species in Yellowstone National Park. In compliance with this request I reached Yellowstone May 1 to begin field studies of the coyote and other species on which it preys. Although it has not been possible to devote all of my time to this study I feel that it has not suffered greatly as a result of other special assignments given me and that fairly good continuity in observations has been ma intained. Special assign­ ments kept me away from Yellatqstone for various periods as follows:- Wind River Mountain investigation, July 26 - August l; i9'lathead .lforest investigation, August 8 - 22; Shoshone ..l!'orest trip, September 6 - 14. Most of October was spent in the Omaha. office and December was devoted to the analyslbs of scats in Jackson, Wyoming. This brief report on the coyote study is being ma.de at the request of Mr. Cahalane, Acting Chief of the • ildlife Division, in a letter dated December 20, to Mr. Allen, Region­ al Director, Region 2. A copy of this letter was sent to me at Yellowstone and mis-forwarded to 1ioran, fanilly reaching me today, January 5. Since the report is wanted in Washington by the middle of January there is not time for making anything but a brief report on my findings so far.
    [Show full text]
  • (And Earlier Known As "Platte Bridge Station**) (Fort Caspar Commission) City of Casper County Clerk's Office, Natrona
    Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Wyoming COUNTY; NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Natrona INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) COMMON: Fort Caspar AND/OR HISTORIC: Same (and earlier known as "Platte Bridge Station**) STREET AND NUMBER: 14 Fort Caspar Road CITY OR TOWN: Casper Wyoming 56 Natrona 025 CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC Z District Q Building Public Public Acquisition: Occupied Yes: Q Restricted o Site Q Structure Private || In Process Unoccupied |jj] Unrestricted n Object n ( | Being Considered Preservation work in progress a NO u PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) ID I I Agricultural JC~I Government S Park f~l Transportation (~1 Comments | [ Commercial f~) Industrial [~] Private Residence D Other (Specify) Q] Educational | | Military [~~1 Religious Q Entertainment B3 Museum I | Scientific OWNER'S NAME: (Fort Caspar Commission) City of Casper UJ STREET AND NUMBER: LU City Hall to CITY OR TOWN: CODE Wyoming 56 COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: County Clerk's Office, Natrona County Court House STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: Casper Wyoming 56 TITLE OF SURVEY: Wyoming Recreation Commission, Survey of Historic Sites, Markers & Mon. DATE OF SURVEY: Summer - Fall 1967 D Federal State [ | County Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: Wyoming Recreation Commission, Historical Division STREET AND NUMBER: 604 East 25th Street CITY OR TOWN: Cheyenne Wyoming (Cftecfc One) Excellent D Good Q Fair Deteriorated Ruins [~~1 Unexposed CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) Altered Q Unaltered Moved (3 Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (if known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The dominant structure throughout the 1858-1867 period was Guinard's Platte Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 100 Years ■ 2018 Bierstadt Exhibition
    fall & winter 2017 Celebrating100 years ■ 2018 Bierstadt exhibition ■ From Thorofare to destination, part 2 ■ Dispatches from the Field: the eagles of Rattlesnake Gulch to the point BY BRUCE ELDREDGE | Executive Director About the cover: In Irving R. Bacon’s (1875 – 1962) Cody on the Ishawooa Trail, 1904, William F. “Buffalo Bill” Cody is either gauging the trail before him, or assessing the miles he left behind. As the Buffalo Bill Center of the West nears the end of its Centennial year, we find ourselves on an Ishawooa Trail of our own—celebrating and appraising the past while we plan for the next hundred years. #100YearsMore ©2017 Buffalo Bill Center of the West. Points West is published for members and friends of the Center of the West. Written permission is required to copy, reprint, or distribute Points West materials in any medium or format. All photographs in Points West are Center of the West photos unless otherwise noted. Direct all questions about image rights and reproduction to [email protected]. Bibliographies, works cited, and footnotes, etc. are purposely omitted to conserve space. However, such information is available by contacting the editor. Address correspondence to Editor, Points West, Buffalo Bill Center of the West, As we near the end of 2017, it’s hard to believe our Centennial is soon to become 720 Sheridan Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 82414, or a memory! We’ve had a great celebratory year filled with people and tales about [email protected]. our first hundred years. Exploring our history in depth these past few months has truly validated the words of Henry Ford, who said, “Coming together is a beginning; ■ Managing Editor | Marguerite House keeping together is progress; working together is success.” ■ Assistant Editor | Nancy McClure The Buffalo Bill Center of the West’s beginning was the coming together in ■ Designer | Desirée Pettet & Jessica McKibben 1917 of the Buffalo Bill Memorial Association (BBMA) to honor their namesake and ■ preserve the Spirit of the American West.
    [Show full text]
  • July August September October November December January February March April May June
    Greybull Sandstone Photo by David Lopez, MBMG, 2003 January July S MTWThF S S MTWThF S 1 23 123 4 5678 910 4 5678 910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 February August S MTWThF S S MTWThF S 1234567 1234567 8 91011121314 8 91011121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 31 March September S MTWThF S S MTWThF S 123456 1234 7 8 910111213 5 6 7 8 91011 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 April October S MTWThF S S MTWThF S 123 12 4 5678 910 3 4 5678 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 May November S MTWThF S S MTWThF S 1 123456 234 5678 7 8 91011 12 13 91011 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 30 31 June December S MTWThF S S MTWThF S 12345 1234 678 9101112 5678 91011 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 Butte Office Billings Office 1300 W.
    [Show full text]
  • What in the World Fall/Winter 2011-2012 Newsletter Geography Awarness Week Pg
    In This Issue: Letter from the Chair Pg. 1 What in the World Fall/Winter 2011-2012 Newsletter Geography Awarness Week Pg. 2 “Geography is a Field Discipline” Pg. 2 Letter from the Chair National Geographic Internship Pg. 3 Dear Alumni and Friends of Geography Notably, Caroline McClure completed a at the Univeristy of Wyoming, NGS internship during the spring semester Regional AAG Meeting in Denver Pg. 3 2011 (see page 3). Awards and Recognitions Pg. 4 Greetings from Laramie and the Department The graduate program in geography at UW of Geography at the University of Wyoming! is also thriving. This year eleven new MA UW Geographers in Ethiopia Pg. 5 As you will see while reading this students joined the program coming from newsletter, the Department Donor Challenge Pg. 6 around the United States of Geography at UW and world. We have two Recent Faculty Publications Pg. 7 continues to be active new students from Nepal, in its teaching, research and another from Thailand. Faculty Highlights Pg. 8 and service missions. Additionally, students from We are fortunate to have Michigan, Illinois, Colorado Heart Mountain Pg. 9 a dedicated faculty, and Oklahoma as well knowledgeable staff and as Wyoming joined our great students. Confirming departmental community. this statement is the number A new class of this size and of awards and recognitions diversity is a testament to received over the past few the quality of our faculty months by our departmental and their willingness to community. develop strong mentoring relationships with our Last spring three of our incoming students. We graduate students, Richard are currently reviewing Vercoe, Suzette Savoie, applications for next year, and Alexa Dugan, were Professor and Chair, Gerald R.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart Mountain Wyoming Foundation Newsletter
    KOKORO KARA Summer 2014 HEART MOUNTAIN WYOMING FOUNDATION In This Issue: n Advisor in Residence: Eva Kuwata n Archivist Joins HMWF Staff n An Artistic Legacy at Heart Mountain Celebrating the Generations at Heart Mountain: Board Chair Shirley Ann Higuchi I hope you had a wonderful Asian Pa- children. What is more American than tain Draft Resisters Trial as part of the cific American Heritage Month in May! that? National Consortium Conference. This I want to thank all of our friends who When I was a child, though, schools did August, veterans, like Jack Kunitomi, will joined us at the Hogan Lovells offices in not teach the story of the forced relocation come to our August Pilgrimage, and we Washington, D.C., on May 12 for a screen- of Japanese Americans. That is a problem. will honor them for their contribution to ing of David Ono and Jeff MacIntyre’s Because when this story is not told, we be- this country. Witness: The Legacy of Heart Mountain. come at risk of repeating the mistakes of Nisei, Sansei and Yonsei alike are all It was a huge success. Secretary Norman the past. When we do not remember what working together to make sure that the Mineta and I participated on a panel dis- happened to the Issei and Nisei, we lose a story of Heart Mountain is remembered. cussion with Vincent Eng, Partner and part of our history. When we do not use Every summer, we will celebrate genera- CEO of the VENG Group, and Mee Moua, our voices to tell this story when everyone tions—as three or sometimes four genera- President and Executive Director of Asian else seems to have forgotten it, we are at tions of one family join us in Wyoming for Americans Advancing Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Soda Butte Creek
    Soda Butte Creek monitoring and sampling schemes Final report for the Greater Yellowstone Network Vital Signs Monitoring Program Susan O’Ney Resource Management Biologist Grand Teton National Park P.O. Drawer 170 Moose, Wyoming 83012 Phone: (307) 739 – 3666 December 2004 SODA BUTTE CREEK and REESE CREEK: VITAL SIGNS MONITORING PROGRAM: FINAL REPORT December 2004 Meredith Knauf Department of Geography and Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research University of Colorado, Boulder Mark W. Williams* Department of Geography and Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research University of Colorado, Boulder *Corresponding Address Mark W. Williams INSTAAR and Dept. of Geography Campus Box 450 Boulder, Colorado 80309-0450 Telephone: (303) 492-8830 E-mail: [email protected] Soda_Butte_Creek_Compiled_with_Appendices .doc 5/17/2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We have put together a final report on the recommendations for the Soda Butte Creek and Reese Creek Vital Signs Monitoring Program. The purpose of the grant was to develop detailed protocols necessary to monitor the ecological health of Soda Butte Creek and Reese Creek in and near Yellowstone National Park. The main objectives was to compile existing information on these creeks into one database, document the current conditions of Soda Butte and Reese Creeks by a one-time synoptic sampling event, and present recommendations for vital signs monitoring programs tailored to each creek’s needs. The database is composed of information from government projects by the United States Geological Survey and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, graduate student master’s theses, academic research, and private contractor reports. The information dates back to 1972 and includes surface water quality, groundwater quality, sediment contamination, vegetation diversity, and macroinvertebrate populations.
    [Show full text]
  • FCCWPP 2019 Update
    June 30, 2019 Fremont County, Wyoming This plan developed by the Fremont County CWPP Operating Group in cooperation with: Technical Forestry Services, LLC 6628 W Riverside Drive Casper, Wyoming 82604 www.wytfs.com This Page Left Intentionally Blank Fremont County 2019 CWPP Update Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.1 Public Outreach in Fremont County ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.2 Emergency Management Capabilities ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Wildland-Urban Interface .......................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Other Values at-risk ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Whiskey Mountain-Dubois Badlands Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement
    BLM LIBRARY United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Rawlins District Office January 1990 Whiskey Mountain-Dubois Badlands Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement * sw rwn I s' If/ m ^ . <\W. NV. x v% >-'v\V . 'Xf TD ' 181 fJMt " .W8 J..V# j'f I'f w\\W . A\ W45 v\'^V^ . o"\\N,' 1990 Whiskey Mountain and Dubois Badlands Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement (X) Final Environmental Impact Statement ( ) Draft (X) Legislative Type of Action: ( ) Administrative Responsible Agencies: Lead Agency: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Cooperating Agencies: None Abstract The Whiskey Mountain and Dubois Badlands Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement analyzes two wilderness study areas (WSAs) in the Rawlins District to determine the resource impacts that could result from designation or nondesignation of those WSAs as wilderness. The following WSAs are recommended as nonsuitable for wilderness designation: Whiskey Moutain (487 acres) and Dubois Badlands (4,520 acres). Comments have been requested and received from the following: See the “Consultation" section. Date draft statement made available to the Environmental Protection Agency and the public. Draft EIS: Filed 11/14/88 Final EIS: United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WYOMING STATE OFFICE P.O. BOX 1828 CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82003 Dear Reader: Enclosed is the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the Whiskey Mountain and Dubois Badlands Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) in the Lander Resource Area of our Rawlins District. You were sent this copy because of your past interest and participation in the review of the draft version of the EIS.
    [Show full text]