University of Baltimore Law Forum Volume 9 Article 3 Number 1 Fall/Winter 1978/1979 1979 Behavioral Study of Justice Goldberg and the Supreme Court David Hanley Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hanley, David (1979) "Behavioral Study of Justice Goldberg and the Supreme Court," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 9 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol9/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Forum by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. munity must adopt the land use provisions as outlined above unless it chooses to accept the federal benefit of Federal Flood Behavioral Study of Justice Insurance. Second, although the U.S. Department of Housing and Goldberg and the Supreme Urban Development, through its Federal Insurance Adminis- tration, publishes and monitors the land use criteria as well as Court provides technical assistance to the various communities which request such, it is the communities themselves, not the For the period of 1962 to 1969, the United States Supreme Federal Government, which ultimately adopt the land use Court has been accused of "judicial activism" and of lacking criteria for their area. "judicial self-restraint." Supporters of self-restraint have These two points were the subject of recent litigation in the accused the Justices of overstepping their authority, of making Federal District Court for the District of Columbia.21 The case, themselves into super-legislators, and of revealing to the public Texas Landowners Rights Association v.