2007 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Texture Comparison in Chips in Various Environments Through Mechanical Property Estimation
Texture comparison in chips in various environments through mechanical property estimation An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by: _______________ _______________ _______________ Robert Allen Dylan Billings Keegan Leitz ___________________ Satya Shivkumar Advisor 12 March 2012 Abstract Crispiness is an important factor when gauging the quality and freshness of a potato chip. In this study, the effects of pH and moisture content on the compressive and flexural properties of different types of chips were studied. In general, chips with surface ridges were found to have a lower compressive strength than the plain chips. It was determined that the breaking pattern of the chips during compression and flexural testing can be correlated with chip crispiness. 1 Contents 1 Abstract 2 Contents 3 Introduction 4 Background 10 Objectives 11 Methodology 12 Mechanical testing 16 Conductivity testing 18 pH testing 20 Water content 21 Results and Discussion 21 General chip observations 23 Three point testing 27 Compressive testing 32 Conductivity testing 32 pH testing 35 Water content 38 Conclusion 39 Acknowledgements 40 References 41 Appendices 41 A - Three point data 43 B - Three point videos 45 C - Pringles compressive data 49 D - Pringles compressive test videos 53 E - Lays Stax compressive data 56 F - Lays Stax compressive test videos 58 G - Three point test graphs 67 H - Three point test data tables 70 I - Average Pringles compressive test 73 J - Average Lays Stax compressive test 76 K - Ingredients of chips used 77 L - Pringles compressive test data tables 82 M - Lays Stax compressive test data tables 2 Introduction With potato chips earning $7.1764 Billion of revenue and tortilla chips generating an additional $5.5798 Billion in 2009 (1), Potato chips represent an enormous portion of the snack foods consumed in the United States and other western countries. -
Case 23 Pepsico's
BFV GROUP : Beatrice Teresa Colantoni, Francesco Morgia, Valentina Palmerio. PepsiCo’s Business Case – CASE 23 PEPSICO’S HISTORY. PepsiCo, Inc., was established in 1965 when PepsiCola and Frito-Lay shareholders agreed to a merger between the salty-snack icon and soft-drink giant. The new company was founded with annual revenues of $510 million and such well-known brands as Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, Fritos, Lay’s, Cheetos, Ruffles, and Rold Gold. By 1971, PepsiCo had more than doubled its revenues to reach $1 billion. The company began to pursue growth through acquisitions outside snacks and beverages as early as 1968, but its 1977 acquisition of Pizza Hut significantly shaped the strategic direction of PepsiCo for the next 20 years. The acquisitions of Taco Bell in 1978 and Kentucky Fried Chicken in 1986 created a business portfolio described by Wayne Calloway (PepsiCo’s CEO between 1986 and 1996) as a balanced three-legged stool. Calloway believed the combination of snack foods, soft drinks, and fast food offered considerable cost sharing and skill transfer opportunities. PepsiCo strengthened its portfolio of snack foods and beverages during the 1980s and 1990s, adding also quick-service restaurant. By 1996 it had become clear to PepsiCo management that the potential strategic-fit benefits existing between restaurants and PepsiCo’s core beverage and snack businesses were difficult to capture. In 1997, CEO Roger Enrico spun off the company’s restaurants as an independent, publicly traded company to focus PepsiCo on food and beverages. Soon after the spinoff of PepsiCo’s fast-food restaurants was completed, Enrico acquired Cracker Jack, Tropicana, Smith’s Snackfood Company in Australia, SoBe teas and alternative beverages, Tasali Snack Foods (the leader in the Saudi Arabian salty-snack market), and the Quaker Oats Company. -
Frito-Lay Peanut/Tree Nut Free Processing Facilities – Information Sheet
Frito-Lay Peanut/Tree Nut Free Processing Facilities – Information Sheet As of February 27, 2014 the following Food Service/Vend products DO NOT CONTAIN PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS AND ARE NOT PRODUCED IN PEANUT/TREE NUT MANUFACTURING FACILITIES*: Baked! Cheetos® Cheese Snacks Fritos® Corn Chips Baked! Doritos® Tortilla Chips Funyuns® Onion Snacks Baked! Lay’s® Potato Chips Lay’s® Potato Chips Baked! Ruffles® Ridged Potato Chips Lay’s® Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Baked! Tostitos® Scoops® Tortilla Chips Miss Vickies® Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Baken-ets® Pork Skins Ruffles® Ridged Potato Chips Cheetos® and RF Cheetos® Cheese Snacks Santitas® Tortilla Chips Cheetos® Fantastix® Snacks SunChips® Multigrain Chips Chester’s® Hot Fries Smartfood® Delight White Cheddar Popcorn Doritos® and RF Doritos® Tortilla Chips Tostitos® Tortilla Chips and RF Tostitos® Tortilla Chips As of February 27, 2014, the following Food Service/Vend products DO NOT CONTAIN PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUTS.* HOWEVER, THEY MAY BE PRODUCED IN FACILITIES WHERE PRODUCTS CONTAINING PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS ARE ALSO PRODUCED. Munchies® Snack Mixes Smartfood® White Cheddar Popcorn Quaker® Kids Snack Mixes Rold Gold® Pretzels Stacy’s® Pita Chips As of February 27, 2014 the following Food Service/Vend products CONTAIN PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS AND/OR ARE PRODUCED IN FACILITIES WHERE PRODUCTS CONTAINING PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS ARE PROCESSED. Frito-Lay® Nuts Grandma’s® Cookies Munchies® Crackers *The products listed do not contain Peanut or Tree Nut Ingredients; however, they have not been tested for the inadvertent presence of Peanuts and/or Tree Nuts Ingredients. . -
View Annual Report
2 Letter to Shareholders 10–11 Financial Highlights 12 The Breadth of the PepsiCo Portfolio 14 Reinforcing Existing Value Drivers 18 Migrating Our Portfolio Towards High-Growth Spaces Table 22 Accelerating the Benefits of of Contents One PepsiCo 24 Aggressively Building New Capabilities 28 Strengthening a Second-to-None Team and Culture 30 Delivering on the Promise of Performance with Purpose 33 PepsiCo Board of Directors 34 PepsiCo Leadership 35 Financials Dear Fellow Shareholders, Running a company for the long • We delivered +$1 billion savings term is like driving a car in a race in the first year of our productiv- that has no end. To win a long race, ity program and remain on track you must take a pit stop every now to deliver $3 billion by 2015; and then to refresh and refuel your • We achieved a core net return car, tune your engine and take other on invested capital3 (roic) of actions that will make you even 15 percent and core return on faster, stronger and more competi- equity3 (roe) of 28 percent; tive over the long term. That’s what • Management operating cash we did in 2012—we refreshed and flow,4 excluding certain items, refueled our growth engine to help reached $7.4 billion; and drive superior financial returns in • $6.5 billion was returned to our the years ahead. shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. We invested significantly behind our brands. We changed the operating The actions we took in 2012 were model of our company from a loose all designed to take us one step federation of countries and regions further on the transformation to a more globally integrated one to journey of our company, which enable us to build our brands glob- we started in 2007. -
IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in Re
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In re PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. : Consolidated C.A. No. 4530-VCS SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION : VERIFIED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Philadelphia Public Employees Retirement System (“Philadelphia PERS”), The General Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit General”), The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit P&F”), the City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System (“Ann Arbor”) and Beverly Rosman (“Rosman,” and collectively with Philadelphia PERS, Detroit General, Detroit P&F and Ann Arbor, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, upon knowledge as to themselves and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs are holders of common stock of PepsiAmericas, Inc. (“PAS” or the “Company”). Plaintiffs bring this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all holders of PAS common stock other than the defendants and their affiliates. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and other equitable relief in connection with the proposal of PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”) to acquire all of the PAS’ outstanding shares that PepsiCo does not already own for a combination of cash and stock valuing PAS at $23.27 per share (the “Proposed Merger”). 2. PepsiCo simultaneously offered to acquire Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (“PBG” and with PAS, the “Companies”) at $29.50 per share, and has made consummation of a merger with either bottler contingent on consummating a merger with the other. PepsiCo’s offers are timed and structured to favor PepsiCo and promise a paltry 17.1 percent premium over the closing prices of the Companies’ stock on April 17, 2009, the last trading day prior to PepsiCo’s announcement of the Proposed Merger. -
Matt Alfano & Brittany Masi Frito Lay Replenishment Manager: Jeff Arndt
Senior Design Spring 2010 Matt Alfano & Brittany Masi Frito Lay Replenishment Manager: Jeff Arndt Corporate Structure PepsiCo Americas PepsiCo Americas PepsiCo Foods Beverages International Our food, snack and • Frito-Lay North America • Pepsi-Cola North America beverage businesses in: •Quaker • Gatorade •U.K. •Sabritas •Tropicana •Europe •Gamesa • Latin American beverage •Asia • Latin American food businesses businesses • North America foodservice • Middle East • Power of One retail •Africa sales teams Frito-Lay North America represents 37% of PepsiCo’s profit and about 29% of its revenues. * * PepsiCo 2008 Annual Report Frito-Lay North America • Convenient foods leader • $11 billion in annual sales • Division of PepsiCo • 48,000+ employees • Headquartered in Plano, TX • 70+ year history – 30+ plants and 200 distribution centers across the U.S. and Canada. – One of the largest private fleets in North America Brands Category Leader #1 Potato Chips #1 Corn Chips #1 Extruded Snack #1 Tortilla Chips #2 Pretzels #1 Premium Meats #1 Dips/Salsas #1 Branded Nuts #1 Pita Chips Background & Problem Situations Out of Stock (OOS) issues due to: • Little or no control over RSRs (route sales rep.) • Outdated OOS Tools and Server • Unknown appropriate delivery frequencies • Unknown Inventory levels needed per club, per SKU Goals & General Approach • Create a single, user-friendly database/server to make sales information and reports more readily and easily available • Update OOS Analysis Tools Modeling tools used for accomplishing goals and fixing -
EXTRA SAVINGS We Had Too Many Specials to Fit in This Week’S Main Ad
EXTRA SAVINGS We had too many specials to fit in this week’s main ad. GROCERY & Party Center Mist Twist, Crush or Mug Root Beer Bunny Deluxe 2 LTR. BTLS. Lipton or Pure Leaf Tea, Life Water, Hamburger, Brat Heinz & Sausage, Kaiser or Yellow or Sobe, Amp, Rockstar, Lemon Lemon, Spicy Brown Kickstart, Mtn Dew Cans or Pepsi 1893 12 CT. Hamburger Buns Mustard 12 OZ. – 1 LTR. PKGS. $ 2/$3 $ 2/ 4 6–12 CT. PKGS. Selected Varieties 14 OZ. BTLS. 10/ 10Over 100 Selected Varieties DAIRY & Frozen BODY & HOME Prairie Farms Depend Undergarments Yogurt or Poise Pads Oreo Churros $ 99 $ $ 17–5413 CT. PKG. 7 Selected Varieties 2/ 7 2/6 OZ. CUPS 1 10.3 OZ. PKGS. Nivea Rubbermaid Body Wash Freshworks Containers MEAT $ 99 Large $14 99 3 $ 99 16.9 OZ. PKG. Medium 11 4 Selected Varieties Small $799 Gardein Meatless Varieties Nivea 1 CT. PKG. Body Lotion Colgate Toothpaste $ 49 $599 $ 13.5–16.9 OZ. PKG. 2/ 3 9–13.74 OZ. PKG. All Varieties 4 OZ. PKGS. 2 Selected Varieties 4 Selected Varieties Our stores are loaded with temporary price reductions. This ad has just a sampling of the extra savings you’ll find in each Dierbergs. You can also visit us at Dierbergs.com. 18-5001-04 dh Prices In THIS AD GOOD TUESday, jan. 23, 2018, Through monday, jan. 29, 2018 FROZEN & DAIRY MEAT Quorn Chicken Reser’s 4 Pk. Nuggets, Patties, Single Serve Frontera Frontera Minute Maid Cutlets or Beef Mashed Potatoes Rhodes Rolls Skillet Meals Bowls Orange Juice Perdue Premium Style Grind or or Macaroni & $ Meatballs Cheese Singles 2/$5 $849 $449 2/ 6 Breaded Chicken $ 99 $ 11.5–12 OZ. -
Estta603348 05/08/2014 in the United States
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA603348 Filing date: 05/08/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91178927 Party Plaintiff Royal Crown Company, Inc. and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. Correspondence LAURA POPP ROSENBERG Address FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC 866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZA NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES [email protected], [email protected], lpopp-rosen- [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], mort- [email protected] Submission Brief on Merits for Plaintiff Filer's Name Laura Popp-Rosenberg Filer's e-mail [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], mort- [email protected], [email protected] Signature /Laura Popp-Rosenberg/ Date 05/08/2014 Attachments REDACTED Initial Trial Brief for DPSG (F1447288x96B9E).pdf(498041 bytes ) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ------------------------------------------------------x ROYAL CROWN COMPANY, INC. and : DR PEPPER/SEVEN UP, INC., : Consolidated Proceedings: : Opposition No. 91178927 Opposers, : Opposition No. 91180771 : Opposition No. 91180772 - against - : Opposition No. 91183482 : Opposition No. 91185755 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, : Opposition No. 91186579 : Opposition No. 91189847 Applicant. : Opposition No. 91190658 ------------------------------------------------------x --and-- ------------------------------------------------------x THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, : : Consolidated Proceedings: Opposer, : Opposition No. 91184434 : - against - : : ROYAL CROWN COMPANY, INC. and : DR PEPPER/SEVEN UP, INC., : : Applicants. : ------------------------------------------------------x TRIAL BRIEF FOR ROYAL CROWN COMPANY, INC. AND DR PEPPER/SEVEN UP, INC. Barbara A. Solomon Laura Popp-Rosenberg Emily Weiss FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 United Nations Plaza New York, New York 10017 Attorneys for Royal Crown Company, Inc. -
Some Suppliers Worry About Tesla Tion’S Internal Deliberations
. ****** TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2018 ~ VOL. CCLXXII NO. 43 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 DJIA 25758.69 À 89.37 0.3% NASDAQ 7821.01 À 0.1% STOXX 600 383.23 À 0.6% 10-YR. TREAS. À 14/32 , yield 2.823% OIL $66.43 À $0.52 GOLD $1,186.80 À $10.30 EURO $1.1484 YEN 110.07 What’s Long Wait Ends With an Embrace for Separated Korean Families U.S. News Toughens Business&Finance Stance esla’s tumultuous year On China Thas fueled concern among some suppliers about the electric-car maker’s fi- Tariffs nancial strength, after pro- duction of the Model 3 BY BOB DAVIS drained some of its cash. A1 AND ANDREW DUEHREN PepsiCo agreed to buy WASHINGTON—The Trump seltzer-machine maker administration is moving SodaStream for $3.2 billion, closer this week to levying tar- the company’s latest move iffs on nearly half of Chinese to broaden its offerings. A1 imports despite broad opposi- Tyson Foods struck a tion from U.S. business and deal to acquire Keystone the start of a fresh round of Foods, a top meat supplier talks between the U.S. and to McDonald’s and other China aimed at settling the chains, for $2.16 billion. B1 trade dispute. The twin administration ini- France’s Total is having tiatives—pursuing tariffs on difficulty unloading its $200 billion of Chinese goods stake in a $5 billion natu- while relaunching talks to ral-gas project in Iran to a scrap tariffs—reflect a split Chinese partner. -
MASTER UPC June08
PCBC of Marysville & Manhattan UPC List PROD UPC DESCRIPTION SIZE PACK NUMB CODE 12oz 12pk PET 502 Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 00830 6 2-12pks 503 Dt Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 00831 3 2-12pks 510 Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 00832 0 2-12pks 511 Dt Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 00833 7 2-12pks 550 Dr Pepper 12pk 0 78000 00602 5 2-12pks 551 Dt Dr Pepper 12 pk 0 78000 00603 2 2-12pks 16.9oz 12pk PET 1302 Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 10200 4 2-12pks 1303 Dt Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 10201 1 2-12pks 1310 Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 10203 5 2-12pks 1311 Dt Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 10737 5 2-12pks 20oz Pet 602 Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00129 1 24 loose 603 Dt Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00130 7 24 loose 607 CF Dt Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00121 5 24 loose 690 Cherry Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00559 6 24 loose 691 Dt Cherry Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00579 4 24 loose 686 Dt Pepsi Vanilla 20 oz 0 12000 81189 0 24 loose 677 Dt Pepsi Max 20 oz 0 12000 01880 0 24 loose 610 Mt Dew 20 oz 0 12000 00131 4 24 loose 611 Dt Mt Dew 20 oz 0 12000 00134 5 24 loose 692 Code Red 20 oz 0 12000 00224 3 24 loose 618 Live Wire 20 oz 0 12000 81131 9 24 loose 613 Sierra Mist 20 oz 0 12000 00354 7 24 loose 612 Sierra Mist Free 20 oz 0 12000 20115 8 24 loose 628 Sierra Mist Orange 20 oz 0 12000 02786 4 24 loose 629 Sierra Mist Free Orange 20 oz 0 12000 02794 9 24 loose 634 Mug Rootbeer 20 oz 0 12000 00910 5 24 loose 636 DEWmocracy Volt Rasp 20 oz 0 12000 02862 5 24 loose 637 DEWmocracy Rev Berry 20 oz 0 12000 02866 3 24 loose 638 DEWmocracy Nova Straw 20 oz 0 12000 02870 0 24 loose 650 Dr Pepper 20 oz 0 78000 08240 1 24 loose 651 Dt Dr Pepper 20 oz 0 78000 08340 -
Bottles and Extras Fall 2006 44
44 Fall 2006 Bottles and Extras Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12 Fig. 13 Fig. 14 Fig. 16 Fig. 17 Fig. 18 Fig. 19 Fig. 20 Fig. 21 Fig. 22 Fig. 23 Fig. 24 Fig. 25 Fig. 26 Fig. 27 Fig. 28 Fig. 29 Fig. 30 Fig. 31 Fig. 32 Fig. 33 Fig. 34 Fig. 35 Fig. 36 Fig. 37 Fig. 38 Fig. 39 Fig. 40 Fig. 42 Fig. 43 Fig. 45 Fig. 46 Fig. 47 Fig. 48 Fig. 52 Bottles and Extras March-April 2007 45 nationwide distributor of convenience– and dollar-store merchandise. Rosen couldn’t More Energy Drink Containers figure out why Price Master was not selling coffee. “I realized coffee is too much of a & “Extreme Coffee” competitive market,” Rosen said. “I knew we needed a niche.” Rosen said he found Part Two that niche using his past experience of Continued from the Summer 2006 issue selling YJ Stinger (an energy drink) for By Cecil Munsey Price Master. Rosen discovered a company named Copyright © 2006 “Extreme Coffee.” He arranged for Price Master to make an offer and it bought out INTRODUCTION: According to Gary Hemphill, senior vice president of Extreme Coffee. The product was renamed Beverage Marketing Corp., which analyzes the beverage industry, “The Shock and eventually Rosen bought the energy drink category has been growing fairly consistently for a number of brand from Price Master. years. Sales rose 50 percent at the wholesale level, from $653 million in Rosen confidently believes, “We are 2003 to $980 million in 2004 and is still growing.” Collecting the cans and positioned to be the next Red Bull of bottles used to contain these products is paralleling that 50 percent growth coffee!” in sales at the wholesale level. -
Copycat Snacks in Schools by Cara Wilking, J.D
The Public Health PHAI Advocacy Institute MAY 2014 Copycat Snacks in Schools by Cara Wilking, J.D. Introduction The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA) authorized the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to set nutrition standards for all foods and beverages sold in schools.1 Prior to the HHFKA, the USDA only promulgated rules for items sold outside of the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) that were of “minimal nutritional value,” such as soda, gum, and candy.2 Starting July 1, 2014, all foods sold outside of the NSLP, such as food from vending machines and school stores, will have to meet USDA “Smart Snacks” nutrition criteria. Not wanting to lose the in-school marketing opportunity, major food companies like PepsiCo are producing reformulated versions of popular junk foods like Cheetos® and Doritos® that meet the Smart Snacks criteria, but use the same brand names, logos and spokescharacters as are used to market traditional junk food. These copycat snacks are not widely available for purchase outside of schools and are clearly designed to co-market traditional junk food to children in school. This issue brief describes copycat snacks, how they undermine nutrition education efforts, and what can be done to stop the sale and marketing of these products in schools. Copycat Snacks Copycat snacks are a vehicle for food companies to co-market their popular unhealthy, junk food brands in schools. Copycat snacks meet USDA Smart Snacks nutrition criteria, but are marketed using brand names, product names, logos, and spokescharacters that are also used to market junk food.