Carpodetus Serratus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees. -
Indigenous Plant Naming and Experimentation Reveal a Plant–Insect Relationship in New Zealand Forests
Received: 23 February 2020 Revised: 10 August 2020 Accepted: 25 August 2020 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.282 CONTRIBUTED PAPER Indigenous plant naming and experimentation reveal a plant–insect relationship in New Zealand forests Priscilla M. Wehi1,2 | Gretchen Brownstein2 | Mary Morgan-Richards1 1School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, Abstract New Zealand Drawing from both Indigenous and “Western” scientific knowledge offers the 2Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, opportunity to better incorporate ecological systems knowledge into conserva- Dunedin, New Zealand tion science. Here, we demonstrate a “two-eyed” approach that weaves Indige- Correspondence nous ecological knowledge (IK) with experimental data to provide detailed and Priscilla M. Wehi, Manaaki Whenua comprehensive information about regional plant–insect interactions in Landcare Research, 764 Cumberland New Zealand forests. We first examined Maori names for a common forest Street, Dunedin 9053, New Zealand. Email: [email protected], tree, Carpodetus serratus, that suggest a close species interaction between an [email protected] herbivorous, hole-dwelling insect, and host trees. We detected consistent – Funding information regional variation in both Maori names for C. serratus and the plant insect Foundation for Research, Science and relationship that reflect Hemideina spp. abundances, mediated by the presence Technology; Royal Society of New Zealand of a wood-boring moth species. We found that in regions with moths C. serratus trees are home to more weta than adjacent forest species and that these weta readily ate C. serratus leaves, fruits and seeds. These findings con- firm that a joint IK—experimental approach can stimulate new hypotheses and reveal spatially important ecological patterns. -
NEWSLETTER No
Waikato Botanical Society Inc. NEWSLETTER No. 37, November 2013 President Paula Reeves Ph 021 267 5802 [email protected] Secretary Kerry Jones Ph 07 855 9700 / 027 747 0733 [email protected] For all correspondence: Waikato Botanical Society Treasurer The University of Waikato Mike Clearwater C/o- Department of Biological Sciences Ph 07 838 4613 / 021 203 2902 Private Bag 3105 [email protected] HAMILTON Email: [email protected] Newsletter Editor Website: http://waikatobotsoc.org.nz/ Susan Emmitt Ph 027 408 4374 [email protected] Editors note I have just taken on the role of newsletter editor and there is a lot that has happened since the last newsletter in March. I have recently been helping out at the National Wetland Centre at Rotopiko/ Lake Serpentine near Ohaupo, where there is a lot of exciting things happening right now, and there are lots of ways to be involved with this project for those that are interested, so this newsletter has a section on volunteer opportunities as it seems people with botanical skills are always needed. If other members know of projects that botanical society members might want to get involved with, they are welcome to advertise in the next newsletter. Next years’ trip programme is in this newsletter, however details will be added closer to the time for some trips. Hopefully we will also be able to have a number of talks in 2014 like we did this year, thanks to Cynthia for organising these!! I hope you all have a happy and safe Christmas and New Year!! Happy botanising! Susan Index AGM minutes……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Plant profile………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 News…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Field trip reports…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Field trip programme 2014…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………20 1 nd AGM minutes – 22 April 2013 Minute Taker : Kerry Jones. -
Carpodetus Serratus
Carpodetus serratus COMMON NAME Putaputaweta, marbleleaf FAMILY Rousseaceae AUTHORITY Carpodetus serratus J.R.Forst. et G.Forst. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No ENDEMIC FAMILY Mikimiki, Tararua Forest Park. Jan 1994. No Photographer: Jeremy Rolfe STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE CARSER CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 30 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS Mikimiki, Tararua Forest Park. Jan 1994. 2012 | Not Threatened Photographer: Jeremy Rolfe PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | Not Threatened 2004 | Not Threatened BRIEF DESCRIPTION Small tree with smallish round or oval distinctively mottled (hence common name) toothed leaves; branchlets zig- zag (particularly when young) DISTRIBUTION Endemic. Widespread. North, South and Stewart Islands. HABITAT Coastal to montane (10-1000 m a.s.l.). Moist broadleaf forest, locally common in beech forest. A frequent component of secondary forest. Streamsides and forest margins. FEATURES Monoecious small tree up to 10 m tall. Trunk slender, bark rough, corky, mottled grey-white, often knobbled due to insect boring. Juvenile plants with distinctive zig-zag branching which is retained to a lesser degree in branchlets of adult. Leaves broad-elliptic to broad-ovate or suborbicular; dark green, marbled; membranous becoming thinly coriaceous; margin serrately toothed; tip acute to obtuse. Juvenile leaves 10-30 mm x 10-20 mm. Adult leaves 40-60 mm x 20-30mm. Petioles c. 10 mm; petioles, peduncles and pedicels pubescent; lenticels prominent. Flowers in panicles at branchlet tips; panicles to 50 x 50 mm; flowers 5-6 mm diam.; calyx lobes c. 1 mm long, triangular- attenuate; petals white, ovate, acute, 3-4 mm long. Stamens 5-6, alternating with petals; filaments short. -
Plant Me Instead!
PLANT ME INSTEAD! CENTRAL DISTRICTS Acknowledgements Thank you to the following people and organisations who helped with the production of this booklet: Albert James (Manawatu District Council), Sally Pierce (Environment Network Manawatu), Kelly Stratford, Margaret Metcalfe and Graeme Lacock (DOC), Garry McGraw (Tararua District Council), Geoff Wilkinson (Palmerston North City Council), Ross I’anson and Christine Godetz (Rangitikei District Council), Peter Shore (Horowhenua District Council), Elaine Iddon and Craig Davey (Horizons Regional Council), Chris Hayvice (Ruapehu District Council), Anwyl Minnaar, Forest & Bird, Team Te One, and Castlecliff Coastcare for input, information and advice; John Barkla, Jeremy Rolfe, Trevor James, John Clayton, Peter de Lange, John Smith-Dodsworth, John Liddle (Liddle Wonder Nurseries), Geoff Bryant, Clayson Howell, John Sawyer and others who provided photos; and Sonia Frimmel (What’s the Story) for design and layout. While all non-native alternatives have been screened against several databases to ensure they are not considered weedy, predicting future behaviour is not an exact science! The only way to be 100% sure is to use ecosourced native species. Published by: Weedbusters © 2010 ISBN: 978-0-9582844-7-9 Get rid of a weed, plant me instead! Many of the weedy species that are invading and damaging our natural areas are ornamental plants that have ‘jumped the fence’ from gardens and gone wild. It costs councils, government departments and private landowners millions of dollars, and volunteers and community groups thousands of unpaid hours, to control these weeds every year. This Plant Me Instead booklet profiles the environmental weeds of greatest concern to those in your region who work and volunteer in local parks and reserves, national parks, bush remnants, wetlands and coastal areas. -
Phylogenetics of Asterids Based on 3 Coding and 3 Non-Coding Chloroplast DNA Markers and the Utility of Non-Coding DNA at Higher Taxonomic Levels
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24 (2002) 274–301 www.academicpress.com Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels Birgitta Bremer,a,e,* Kaare Bremer,a Nahid Heidari,a Per Erixon,a Richard G. Olmstead,b Arne A. Anderberg,c Mari Kaallersj€ oo,€ d and Edit Barkhordariana a Department of Systematic Botany, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Norbyva€gen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden b Department of Botany, University of Washington, P.O. Box 355325, Seattle, WA, USA c Department of Phanerogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden d Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden e The Bergius Foundation at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 50017, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Received 25 September 2001; received in revised form 4 February 2002 Abstract Asterids comprise 1/4–1/3 of all flowering plants and are classified in 10 orders and >100 families. The phylogeny of asterids is here explored with jackknife parsimony analysis of chloroplast DNA from 132 genera representing 103 families and all higher groups of asterids. Six different markers were used, three of the markers represent protein coding genes, rbcL, ndhF, and matK, and three other represent non-coding DNA; a region including trnL exons and the intron and intergenic spacers between trnT (UGU) to trnF (GAA); another region including trnV exons and intron, trnM and intergenic spacers between trnV (UAC) and atpE, and the rps16 intron. -
Pit Membrane Remnants in Perforation Plates of Hydrangeales With
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 146, 41-51. With 32 figures Pit membrane remnants in perforation plates of Hydrangeales with comments on pit membrane remnant occurrence, physiological significance and phylogenetic distribution in dicotyledons SHERWIN CARLQUIST FLS* and EDWARD L. SCHNEIDER Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, 1212 Mission Canyon Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93105, USA Received October 2003; accepted for publication March 2004 Perforation plates from ten species of seven genera of Hydrangeales sensu Thorne were studied using scanning elec tron microscopy (SEM). The presence of pit membranes in perforations ranges from abundant, as in Carpenteria and Hydrangea, to minimal, as in Deutzia, Escallonia and Philadelphus. Abnormally great pit membrane presence may result from the presence of secondary compounds that inhibit lysis, as in Quintinia serrata; such interference with the natural lysis process may or may not be evident from coarseness and irregularity of pit membrane surface and of threads composing the pit membrane remnants. The presence of pit membrane remnants in perforation plates is hypothesized to be a symplesiomorphy, found in a fraction of dicotyledons with scalariform perforation plates (but still in an appreciable number of species). Pit membrane remnant presence may represent incomplete lysis of pri mary wall material (cellulose microfibrils) in species that occupy highly mesic habitats, where such impedance in the conductive stream does not have an appreciable negative selective value. This physiological interpretation of pit membrane remnants in perforations is enhanced by the phylogenetic distribution as well as the strongly mesic eco logical preferences of species that exemplify this phenomenon in dicotyledons at large. Families with pit membrane presence in perforations are scattered throughout phylogenetic trees, but they occur most often in basal branches of major clades (superorders) or as basal branches of orders within the major clades. -
Effects of Ungulates on Structure and Species Composition in The
R. B. ALLEN1, I. J. PAYTON1 AND J. E. KNOWLTON2 119 1. Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 31-011, Christchurch, New Zealand 2. New Zealand Forest Service, P.O. Box 1340, Rotorua, New Zealand. EFFECTS OF UNGULATES ON STRUCTURE AND SPECIES COMPOSITION IN THE UREWERA FORESTS AS SHOWN BY EXCLOSURES Summary: Seventeen exclosures were built by the New Zealand Forest Service within Urewera forests over the period 1961-68 to exclude ungulates. Forest structure and species composition inside and outside these exclosures were compared in 1980-81. Some relatively shade tolerant species such as the fern Asplenium bulbiferum, the liane Ripogonum scandens, the sub-canopy shrubs Geniostoma ligustrifolium and Coprosma australis and the canopy species Beilschmiedia tawa were less abundant in certain tiers outside the exclosures than inside. By contrast, only a few species were more abundant outside then inside the exclosures. These included the unpalatable shrub Pseudowintera colorata, turf-forming Uncinia species and Cardamine debilis. Overall density and species richness for small diametered trees and for the sapling tier were lower outside the exclosures than inside. Despite the large reduction in ungulate numbers throughout Urewera forests these introduced browsing animals, particularly deer, still affect the structure and composition of most forest types. Keywords: regeneration; forest; introduced animals; ungulates; deer, Cervus sp., Cervidae; exclosure; Urewera; New Zealand. Introduction however, apparently anomolous species The Urewera forests cover about 400 000 ha of distributions, not fully adjusted to altitude, have steep highlands, of which approximately half lie been explained in terms of recent volcanic activity within Urewera National Park (McKelvey, 1973). -
Tupeia Antarctica
Tupeia antarctica COMMON NAME Tāpia, pirita, white mistletoe, tupia, kohuorangi SYNONYMS Viscum antarcticum G.Forst., V. pubigerum A.Cunn., Tupeia cunninghamii Miq. T. pubigera Miq. FAMILY Loranthaceae AUTHORITY Tupeia antarctica (G.Forst.) Cham. et Schlecht FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS Tupeia antarctica from the Catlins. Yes Photographer: John Barkla ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE TUPANT CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 24 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD 2004 | Gradual Decline BRIEF DESCRIPTION Rounded shrub to 1m wide growing on other trees with white bark, finely hairy rounded twigs (lens needed), fleshy variously-shaped bright green leaves and whiteish to pinkish fruit. Leaves 10-70mm long. Flowers tiny. DISTRIBUTION Close up of foliage. Photographer: Chris Ecroyd Endemic to the North and South Islands. HABITAT Forest or scrub (often in regenerating vegetation), where it is parasitic on a wide range of hosts including tarata, karo, Coprosma species, putaputaweta, fivefinger, white maire and broom. FEATURES A shrubby semi-parasite to 1 m diameter. Leaves are oppositely arranged, variable in shape, 10 to 70 by 10 to 40 mm, slightly fleshy and bright green. Stems are always rounded in cross section near the tips, have pale white to grey bark, and downy or hairy branchlets. Flowers are tiny, greenish-yellow. Fruit are fleshy, white to pink, 5 to 7 mm diameter. SIMILAR TAXA Peraxilla colensoi, P. tetrapetala and Trilepidea adamsii all have colourful flowers. Ileostylus micranthus has tiny, yellow-green flowers, a ‘bent’ style, yellow fruit and young stems that are squarish in cross-section and have multiple attachments to its host. -
Nzbotsoc No 64 June 2001
NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 64 JUNE 2001 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Jessica Beever Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2001 ordinary and institutional subs are $18 (reduced to $15 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2001 student sub, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New Subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2001 issue (Number 65) is 25 August 2001. Please post contributions to: Joy Talbot 23 Salmond Street Christchurch 8002 Send contributions by e-mail to [email protected]. Files can be in WordPerfect (version 8 or earlier), MS Word (version 6 or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII. -
Plant Nursery
Ask us about Specialist advice Sourcing unlisted plants PLANT NURSERY PLANT DESCRIPTION OPEN 4th June to 27th September Mon – Fri 8.30am to 4.30pm Sat 8.30am to 12 noon www.gw.govt.nz/Akura P – Pioneer D – Tolerates dry conditions W – Tolerates wind C – Tolerates coastal conditions Wet - Wetland R – Riparian Code Name Height Description Attracts Used for Titoki Alectryon excelsus 8 m Excellent specimen/shade tree. Birds Bees C Gossamer grass Anemanthele lessoniana 1 m Graceful ornamental grass with weeping habit. P, R Makomako; Wineberry Aristotelia serrata 6 m A fast growing easy to establish small tree. Birds Bees C, D, W Renga renga Arthropodium cirratum 1 m Good as ground-cover for dry shade and under trees. Bears graceful white star-shaped flowers on stems from spring to mid-summer. Fruit/seeds January-March. Tolerates coastal winds. Semi-deciduous. Hardy. C, D, W Chatham Island astelia Astelia chathamica 1.5 m Broad flax-like silver leaves, drooping at the tips. Stunning as a Birds feature plant or used in groups. Tolerates dry and windy condi- tions. Prefers semi-shade but will also thrive in full sun. Hardy. P, C, D, W, Mountain toetoe Austroderia fulvida 1.5 m Smaller toetoe species flowering in the spring. Tolerant of wet Erosion Shelter R, Wet and dry conditions. C, D, W South Island toetoe Austroderia richardii 2 m Similar to C. toetoe. More upright with finer seed head. Erosion Shelter P, D, Wet North Island toetoe Austroderia toetoe 2 m Hardy plant good for low shelter. Tolerates swampy and dry Erosion Shelter conditions. -
Set 3 Plains Plant List AA
Food for native birds: F = Fruit S = Bird Seed N = Nectar KAHIKATEA – kereru – manatu, B = Bud/foliage I = Insects lush, older plains ecosystem For lizards: L = fruit Plant Tolerances ■ = tolerates or needs □ = intolerant ½ = tolerant of some * = to establish, protect from frost t = toxic for toddlers Staging 1 = 1st structural nd 2 = 2 year 3 = only after canopy closure PLANT LISTS Selected from vegetation natural to these wet Taitapu soils. Tolerances TALL (NOBLE) TREES (> 12 m) Food sun shade wet dry wind Stages Alectryon excelsus titoki F,I ½ ■ ½ ½ □ 3* Cordyline australis ti kouka, cabbage tree F,N,I ■ ½ ■ ■ ■ 1 Dacrycarpus dacrydioides kahikatea, white pine F ■ ½ ■ □ ■ 2 Elaeocarpus dentatus hinau F,I ½ ½ ½ ½ □ 3* Elaeocarpus hookerianus pokaka F,I ½ ■ ■ ½ □ 2 Pittosporum eugenioides tarata, lemonwood F,I ■ ■ ½ ■ ½ 1 Plagianthus regius manatu, lowland ribbonwood (deciduous) I,B ■ ½ ½ ½ ■ 1 Podocarpus totara totara F ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ 2 Prumnopitys ferruginea miro F □ ■ ■ □ □ 3 Prumnopitys taxifolia matai, black pine F ■ ½ ■ ½ ■ 2 Pseudopanax crassifolius horoeka, lancewood F,B,N,I ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ 2 Sophora microphylla kowhai N,B ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ t 2 SMALL TREES & TALL SHRUBS (> 5 m) Aristotelia serrata makomako, wineberry (semi-decid) F,I,B ½ ½ ½ ½ □ 2 Carpodetus serratus putaputaweta, marbleleaf F,I ½ ■ ½ ½ □ 2 Coprosma areolata net-leaved coprosma F,B ½ ■ ■ ½ □ 2* Coprosma linariifolia linear-leaved coprosma, yellow-wood F ½ ■ ½ ½ ½ 2 Coprosma lucida shining karamu F ½ ■ ½ ½ ■ 2 Coprosma robusta karamu F ■ ■ ■ ½ ½ 1 Coprosma rotundifolia round-leaved