DOCSLIB.ORG

Racial Segregation in the 2000 Census: Promising News by Edward L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Racial Segregation in the 2000 Census: Promising News by Edward L Center on Urban & Metropolitan Policy Racial Segregation in the 2000 Census: Promising News By Edward L. Glaeser, Harvard University and the Brookings Institution, and Jacob L. Vigdor, Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University “While segrega- Findings tion remains An analysis of racial segregation in roughly 300 Metropolitan Statistical Areas using 2000 Census redistricting files indicates that: high in many ■ Overall black/non-black segregation American) remained steady between levels are currently at their lowest 1990 and 2000, although the number point since roughly 1920. There are of African-Americans living in those metropolitan still a large number of “hypersegre- tracts dropped. gated” metropolitan areas, but the 1990s continued a three-decade trend ■ The West is the most integrated areas, it has towards decreasing segregation region of the country, followed by throughout the U.S. the South. The Northeast and Midwest are still quite segregated. generally ■ Out of 291 MSAs analyzed, all but 19 are more integrated than they ■ Segregation declined most sharply were in 1990. The average decline in in places that were growing quickly, decreased segregation was 5.5 percent. in places where the percentage of blacks in the population was ■ The decline in segregation comes changing (growing or shrinking), across the about primarily from the integra- and in places where blacks made up tion of formerly entirely white a small portion of the population in census tracts. The number of over- 1990. Segregation remains extreme country.” whelmingly African-American census in the largest metropolitan areas. tracts (80 percent or more African- I. Introduction the same time period, the segregation levels of only 19 MSAs rose.2 Across metropolitan he 2000 Census documents that, for areas the average decline (without adjusting the third straight decade, segregation for population differences) was 5.5 between blacks and non-blacks percentage points. across American metropolitan areas The purpose of this survey is to examine Thas declined dramatically. Between 1990 and the change in the levels of segregation across 2000 the segregation levels of 272 Metropol- metropolitan areas since 1990, and over a itan Statistical Areas (MSAs) declined.1 Over longer period of time. While segregation April 2001 • The Brookings Institution • Survey Series 1 remains high in many large metropol- tion that looks at pre-1940 time tion measures is to define what it itan areas, especially in the Northeast periods is forced to use political wards, means to be African-American. In and Midwest, it has generally which are in a sense arbitrary and previous censuses, “black” was an decreased across the country and over surely too large (some contain tens of exclusive category, but the 2000 time. The West and South are the thousands of people). For the post- Census allows respondents to identify fastest growing and least segregated 1940 time period, there is the option themselves with multiple races, and regions of the U.S. of using blocks (equivalent to a city therefore the measurement has Regional differences may help to block in most urban areas), block become more complicated. On one explain why previous authors have groups (areas with roughly 1,000 hand, over 95 percent of all respon- generally not focused on the declines inhabitants), and tracts (which are dents in our sample who identified in segregation across the U.S. Massey larger units of roughly 4,000 people). themselves as at least partly black and Denton (1993), in their seminal The advantage of blocks or block identified themselves as only black. work on segregation in America, groups is that they are smaller and On the other hand, the remaining 5 focused primarily on larger cities in allow us to better understand the percent are not distributed evenly the Northeast and Midwest, and micro-geography of urban residence. across MSAs and their presence could therefore may have downplayed the The advantage of tracts is the relative potentially skew segregation indices. importance of recent overall declines ease of comparability over time: for We will present segregation indices in segregation. While the continuing most large cities, tract data are avail- that make use of two basic definitions. segregation of the so-called “rust belt” able beginning in 1940. Primarily for First, the most inclusive definition cities is important, it is also important consistency with our previous work, counts as African-American anyone to document and understand the we have decided to use census tracts who checked “black” as one of his or changes in segregation in more vibrant as the relevant sub-areas. her racial identities. Second, we define and developing areas of the country. African-Americans as those who The relevant definition of city checked only black as their racial iden- II. Methodology The question of city definition tends tity. For the implementation of to come down to two choices. First, segregation indices this distinction here are two basic measures segregation indices can be defined for makes little difference in most cases.4 that are generally used to the metropolitan area as a whole. In capture the degree of residen- this case, the segregation measure will The relevant non-black population tial segregation within an reflect both center city-suburb segre- Finally, in choosing the relevant non- TAmerican city. The “Dissimilarity” gation and the segregation of people black population, there are two basic index is a measure of the proportion of within central cities and suburbs. options. First, one can use non- black people (or non-blacks) that Second, segregation indices can be hispanic whites. Second, one can use would need to move across census defined for sub-units of the metropol- all non-blacks. The essential differ- tracts to get a perfectly even propor- itan area, such as the central city. ence between these options lies in the tion of black residents across the While it is often quite interesting to treatment of Hispanics. Asian, Native entire MSA. The “Isolation” index know about segregation for central American and Pacific Islander popula- indicates the percentage of black resi- cities and suburbs separately, we will tions are generally too small to dents in the census tract where the just focus on segregation at the metro- influence segregation (and their resi- average black resident lives. (These are politan area level. Our past work has dential patterns generally resemble explained in more detail below.)3 convinced us that there is an those of non-hispanic whites). Both To calculate these measures one extremely high correlation between options seem quite reasonable to us, must consider four questions: First, segregation at the central city level but it needs to be understood that what is the appropriate sub-area to and segregation at the metropolitan when different definitions are used, use? Second, how do we define a city? area level across cities. However, our different questions are answered. If Third, what is the appropriate defini- past work has also suggested that the non-black, non-hispanic whites are tion of the black population? Fourth, decline in segregation would tend to used as the comparison groups, then what is the appropriate non-black look steeper if we particularly focused the segregation measures will capture population to consider? on central city level segregation. the extent to which blacks are segre- gated from this group. If all The appropriate geography The appropriate definition of non-blacks are used, then segregation There are generally three sub-areas “African-American” measures will capture the extent to that have been used for segregation Another question that needs to be measures. Academic work on segrega- answered to implement these segrega- continued on next page April 2001 • The Brookings Institution • Survey Series 2 which blacks are segregated from this measures above 0.6 are thought to Later in this essay, we will discuss broader group. For ease of historical represent hypersegregation. current patterns of segregation across comparison, we will focus on black- The isolation index captures the cities. At this point, we will reiterate non-black comparisons. percentage of black residents in the that the cities that are highly segre- This distinction matters because census tract where the average black gated with one measure tend to be blacks are less segregated from resident lives, corrected for the fact highly segregated with all measures. Hispanics than they are from other that this number increases mechani- Thus, we will generally restrict non-hispanic whites. This is an inter- cally with the black share of the ourselves to looking at the dissimilarity esting change from the early 20th overall MSA population. A metropol- measure. century, when blacks were more segre- itan area isolation index of 0.5 gated from ethnic immigrants than indicates that the average black III. Findings they were from native whites. We will resident lives in a census tract in also engage in a somewhat unorthodox which the black share of the popula- A. Overall, segregation levels application of the usual segregation tion exceeds the overall metropolitan between blacks and non-blacks approach. We will look at segregation average by roughly 50 percent. An continued their 30-year decline and for the entire country and for the four index of 0.3 reveals that the average are now at their lowest point since census regions, treating them as if black resident lives in a census tract in roughly 1920. they were cities. In this case, we can which the black share of the popula- Cutler, Glaeser and Vigdor (1999) ask both about integration within tion exceeds the overall metropolitan assembled a comprehensive data set metropolitan areas and integration average by roughly 30 percent. Again, on segregation from 1890 to today across metropolitan areas. We think it can range from something close to (it is posted at www.nber.org and that this is an important way to zero (if each black person lives in an www.pubpol.duke.edu/~jvigdor/ approach to the changing level of inte- integrated census tract) to one (if all segregation).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RACIAL SEGREGATION and the ORIGINS of APARTHEID, 1919--36 Racial Segregation and the Origins of Apartheid in South Africa, 1919-36
    RACIAL SEGREGATION AND THE ORIGINS OF APARTHEID, 1919--36 Racial Segregation and the Origins of Apartheid in South Africa, 1919-36 Saul Dubow, 1989 Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 978-1-349-20043-6 ISBN 978-1-349-20041-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-20041-2 © Saul Dubow, 1989 Softcover reprint ofthe hardcover Ist edition 1989 All rights reserved. For information, write: Scholarly and Reference Division, St. Martin's Press, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 First published in the United States of America in 1989 ISBN 978-0-312-02774-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Racial segregation and the origins of apartheid in South Africa. 1919-36/ Sau1 Dubow. p. cm. Bibliography: p. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-312-02774-2 1. Apartheid-South Africa-History-20th century. I. Dubow, Saul. DT763.R34 1989 88-39594 968.05'3--dc19 CIP Contents Pre/ace vii List 0/ Abbreviations x Introduction 1 PART I 1 The Elaboration of Segregationist Ideology, c. 1900-36 21 1 Early Exponents of Segregation 21 2 'Cultural Adaptation' 29 3 Segregation after the First World War 39 4 The Liberal Break with Segregation 45 2 Segregation and Cheap Labour 51 1 The Cheap-Iabour Thesis 51 2 The Mines 53 3 White Labour 56 4 Agriculture 60 5 The Reserves 66 6 An Emergent Proletariat 69 PART 11 3 Structure and Conßict in the Native Affairs Department 77 1 The Native Affairs Department (NAD) 77 2 Restructuring the NAD: the Public Service Commission, 1922-3 81 3 Conftict within the State and the Native Administration Bill ~ 4 'Efficiency', 'Economy' and 'Flexibility'
    [Show full text]
  • What Anti-Miscegenation Laws Can Tell Us About the Meaning of Race, Sex, and Marriage," Hofstra Law Review: Vol
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 32 | Issue 4 Article 22 2004 Love with a Proper Stranger: What Anti- Miscegenation Laws Can Tell Us About the Meaning of Race, Sex, and Marriage Rachel F. Moran Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Moran, Rachel F. (2004) "Love with a Proper Stranger: What Anti-Miscegenation Laws Can Tell Us About the Meaning of Race, Sex, and Marriage," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 32: Iss. 4, Article 22. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol32/iss4/22 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Moran: Love with a Proper Stranger: What Anti-Miscegenation Laws Can Tel LOVE WITH A PROPER STRANGER: WHAT ANTI-MISCEGENATION LAWS CAN TELL US ABOUT THE MEANING OF RACE, SEX, AND MARRIAGE Rachel F. Moran* True love. Is it really necessary? Tact and common sense tell us to pass over it in silence, like a scandal in Life's highest circles. Perfectly good children are born without its help. It couldn't populate the planet in a million years, it comes along so rarely. -Wislawa Szymborskal If true love is for the lucky few, then for the rest of us there is the far more mundane institution of marriage. Traditionally, love has sat in an uneasy relationship to marriage, and only in the last century has romantic love emerged as the primary, if not exclusive, justification for a wedding in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africaâ•Žs
    Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2019 Issue 1 Article 16 2019 Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Benjamin Zinkel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Benjamin Zinkel, Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation, 2019 J. Disp. Resol. (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2019/iss1/16 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Dispute Resolution by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zinkel: Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Benjamin Zinkel* I. INTRODUCTION South Africa and the United States are separated geographically, ethnically, and culturally. On the surface, these two nations appear very different. Both na- tions are separated by nearly 9,000 miles1, South Africa is a new democracy, while the United States was established over two hundred years2 ago, the two nations have very different climates, and the United States is much larger both in population and geography.3 However, South Africa and the United States share similar origins and histories. Both nations have culturally and ethnically diverse populations. Both South Africa and the United States were founded by colonists, and both nations instituted slavery.4 In the twentieth century, both nations discriminated against non- white citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Before and After Segregation and Apartheid: a Comparative Analysis
    NEW CITIES NEW ECONOMIES Before and After Segregation and Apartheid: A Comparative Analysis By Leland Ware | Peer Review Introduction This article compares conditions in South Africa elimination of apartheid in South Africa, significant before and after apartheid to the circumstances in improvements have been made, but most poor Black America during and after segregation. During the eras people still reside in impoverished communities in of segregation and apartheid, conditions for Black townships and the countryside. people in America and South Africa were oppressive in the extreme. The two systems had some differences, The broad-based, grass roots, Civil Rights movement but the overall impact was the same. Black people started in America in the 1950s. Over the next decade, were physically separated and treated differently, marches, boycotts, and other forms of nonviolent and less favourably, than their white counterparts. protests were organised and executed. These activities The progress made by African Americans during culminated with the enactment of the Civil Rights the 50 years since the end of segregation has been Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair substantial, but significant disparities between Black Housing Act of 1968. In the years that followed, African and white people still linger. In the 25 years since the Americans made significant advances in educational Volume 85 / 2020 63 NEW CITIES NEW ECONOMIES attainment levels, employment opportunities, family income, home ownership, and wealth. The South African government In South Africa, Black people and other non-white is in danger of becoming the groups stepped up their opposition to apartheid in political stereotype of what is the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial and Class Segregation Patterns in the United States
    e.polis Volume V, Fall/Winter 2012 76 Racial and Class Segregation Patterns in the United States: Comparing Atlanta and Chicago Neal Andrew Johnson Urban Studies Undergraduate Capstone Research Project Proposal Dr. Jamie Harris, Professor University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee Spring 2012 e.polis Volume V, Fall/Winter 2012 77 Introduction Segregation is not a new phenomenon. Its roots can be traced back to places such as ancient China in the 6th Century (Kiang, 1994). Here, during the Sui and early Tang dynasties, ‘functional segregation’ was the rule where “the strict social hierarchy of society had been reflected and reinforced by the rigid segregation of populations in their respective wards” (Kiang, 1994; 48). Nobility and highly ranked officials were segregated in separate wards from the craftsmen and merchants. Similarly, Lubeck, Germany was segregated with separate quarters for merchants and craftsmen throughout much of the 12th-16th centuries (Parker, 1986). Furthermore, Jews and other religious groups were excluded from living in the city altogether based on their religious backgrounds (Cowan, 1978). So this is nothing new, and has created a serious challenge for cities throughout the centuries. Segregation patterns throughout the twentieth century vary in their scope and implementation. Most American’s are aware of the racial segregation that is apparent in many cities throughout the country. The past century has proven to be a decisive time in the study of these patterns. However, what can be said about segregation along class and economic lines? Does the racial discrimination, particularly between blacks and whites, have any correlation with class segregation? How did these patterns change throughout the twentieth century? Was there any difference between cities of the north versus the cities of the south? These are the questions I seek to answer as I study the segregation patterns of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete List of the Definitions Found in the Dictionary of Race, Ethnicity and Culture
    A complete list of the definitions found in The Dictionary of Race, Ethnicity and Culture A Aborigine \ Acculturation Group \ Adaptation \ Adjustment \ Affirmative \ Afrocentrism \ Aggression \ Alien \ Alienation \ Altruism \ Amnesty \ Anticipated \ Anti-Racism \ Anti-Semitism \ Apartheid \ Art \ Assimilation \ Asylum \ Ausländer B Bilingualism \ Bioethics \ Black \ Boat People \ Border C Caste \ Chauvinism \ Circumcision \ Citizenship \ Civilization \ Colonialism \ Colour Bar \ Colour- Blind Society \ Coloured \ Commission for Racial Equality \ Community \ Complementarism \ Concentration Camp or Death Camp \ Conformism \ Cosmopolitism \ Creole \ Cross-Cultural \ Cross-Cultural Medicine \ Cultural Areas \ Cultural Determinism \ Cultural Evolutionism \ Cultural Imperialism \ Cultural Relativism \ Culture \ Cybernazis D Dance \ Denizen \ Deportation \ Developing Countries \ Diaspora \ Differentialism \ Discrimination \ Diversity-Similarity \ Double Consciousness \ Dual Citizenship E Ebonics \ Eco-Racism \ Emancipation \ Emigration \ Empowerment - Disempowerment \ Enculturation \ Equality \ Ethnic \ Ethnic Cleansing \ Ethnic Enterprises \ Ethnic Minority \ Ethnic Politics \ Ethnicity \ Ethnicity and Race \ Ethnicization \ Ethnocentrism \ Ethnocide \ Ethno-Nationalism \ Ethnopsychiatry \ Evolution \ Exclusion \ Exile \ Exoticism \ Extracomunitario F Family \ Family Reunification \ Flows \ Folklore \ Foreigner \ Fortress \ Free Movement \ Frontier \ Fundamentalism G Gastarbeiter \ Genocide \ Genome \ Genotype \ Ghetto \ Globalization \ Gypsy
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Inequality: Displacement, Exclusion, and Segregation How America’S Housing System Undermines Wealth Building in Communities of Color
    GETTY/BASTIAAN SLABBERS Systematic Inequality: Displacement, Exclusion, and Segregation How America’s Housing System Undermines Wealth Building in Communities of Color By Danyelle Solomon, Connor Maxwell, and Abril Castro August 2019 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Systematic Inequality: Displacement, Exclusion, and Segregation How America’s Housing System Undermines Wealth Building in Communities of Color By Danyelle Solomon, Connor Maxwell, and Abril Castro August 2019 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 2 American public policy systematically removes people of color from their homes and communities 6 Federal, state, and local policies have fortified housing discrimination 13 Conclusion 14 About the authors 15 Methodology 16 Appendix 18 Endnotes Authors’ note: CAP uses “Black” and “African American” interchangeably throughout many of our products. We chose to capitalize “Black” in order to reflect that we are discussing a group of people and to be consistent with the capitalization of “African American.” Introduction and summary Homeownership and high-quality affordable rental housing are critical tools for wealth building and financial well-being in the United States.1 Knowing this, American lawmakers have long sought to secure land for, reduce barriers to, and expand the wealth-building capacity of property ownership and affordable rental housing. But these efforts have almost exclusively benefited white households; often, they have removed people of color from their homes, denied them access to wealth- building opportunities, and relocated them to isolated communities. Across the country, historic and ongoing displacement, exclusion, and segregation continue to prevent people of color from obtaining and retaining their own homes and accessing safe, affordable housing. For centuries, structural racism in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation, Not Apartheid | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Fikra Forum Occupation, Not Apartheid by Mohammed Dajani Apr 7, 2017 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mohammed Dajani Mohammed S. Dajani Daoudi is the former Weston Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and is Director of the Wasatia Academic Institute in Jerusalem. Brief Analysis n 2014, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry warned that Israel risked becoming an apartheid state if a two-state I solution could not be reached. In March 2017, a UN report titled "Israeli Practices toward the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid," published by the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), accused Israel of being an "apartheid state" over its treatment of Palestinians. The authors of the report, Richard Falk and Virginia Tilley, based their definition of apartheid primarily on Article II of the 1973 International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The Rome Statute states: "The term 'the crime of apartheid,' which shall include similar policies and practices of racial segregation and discrimination as practiced in southern Africa, shall apply to...inhuman acts committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them." The Apartheid Convention sets forth that the "crime of apartheid" consists of "discrete inhuman acts that acquire the status of crimes against humanity
    [Show full text]
  • Apartheid Baltimore Style: the Residential Segregation Ordinances of 1910-1913 Garrett Op Wer
    Maryland Law Review Volume 42 | Issue 2 Article 4 Apartheid Baltimore Style: the Residential Segregation Ordinances of 1910-1913 Garrett oP wer Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Garrett oP wer, Apartheid Baltimore Style: the Residential Segregation Ordinances of 1910-1913, 42 Md. L. Rev. 289 (1983) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol42/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APARTHEID BALTIMORE STYLE: THE RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION ORDINANCES OF 1910-1913* GARRETT POWER** On May 15, 1911, Baltimore Mayor J. Barry Mahool, who was known as an earnest advocate of good government, women's sufferage, and social justice, signed into law "lain ordinance for preserving peace, preventing conflict and ill feeling between the white and colored races in Baltimore city, and promoting the general welfare of the city by pro- viding, so far as practicable, for the use of separate blocks by white and colored people for residences, churches and schools."' Baltimore's seg- regation law was the first such law to be aimed at blacks in the United States, but it was not the last. Various southern cities in Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia, North Carolina, and Kentucky enacted similar laws.2 The legal significance of housing segregation laws in the United States was shortlived.
    [Show full text]
  • Segregation and Apartheid in Twentieth-Century South Africa
    SEGREGATION AND APARTHEID IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SOUTH AFRICA ‘This is an outstanding collection…gathering the harvest of twenty years of intense scholarly and political debate. Jim Campbell, Northwestern University, Illinois ‘Well-known to South Africanists as individual contributions, this collection of seminal essays deserves, and will now find, a wider and more multidisciplinary audience.’ C.R.D.Halisi, Indiana University Beinart and Dubow’s selection of some of the most important essays on racial segregation and apartheid in twentieth-century South Africa provides an unparalleled introduction to this contentious and absorbing subject. The volume includes: • a specially written introduction by the editors which contextualizes the historiographical controversy, taking into account the 1994 election and associated changes; • explanatory notes and article summaries to improve the accessibility of the material; • a glossary of unusual terms to facilitate understanding. William Beinart is Reader in History at the University of Bristol. Saul Dubow is Lecturer in History at the School of African and Asian Studies, University of Sussex. Rewriting Histories Rewriting Histories focuses on historical themes where standard conclusions are facing a major challenge. Each book presents 8 to 10 papers (edited and annotated where necessary) at the forefront of current research and interpretation, offering students an accessible way to engage with contemporary debates. Series editor Jack R.Censer is Professor of History at George Mason University REWRITING
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Is an Apartheid State
    Allegation: Israel is an Apartheid State It is not uncommon today to see critics of Israel accusing it of being an apartheid state. Whether such a description is being used to describe Israeli policies towards Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, or towards Arab citizens of Israel, the label is inaccurate, offensive, and often used to delegitimize and denigrate Israel as a whole. Moreover, the use of this inaccurate and highly charged label is also counterproductive to resolving issues related to injustices within Israeli society or the complex Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Apartheid usually refers to the guiding policy of racial segregation in pre-1990s South Africa. Apartheid was a racist, repressive system, by which South Africa’s white minority enforced its domination, through a systematic framework of racist legislation, over black and other non-white racial groups who made up more than 90 percent of the country’s population. The accusation of apartheid fundamentally distorts what Israel is. While there is no doubt that Israel, like every country, has tremendous societal challenges and must do better in dealing with issues of institutionalized bias, discrimination, inequity and racism, choosing to apply the apartheid label would seem to question the legitimacy of the world’s only Jewish state and its continued existence. Within Israel, there are safeguards aimed at ensuring the equal treatment of all citizens, Jewish or Arab, and Israeli laws and democratic institutions, including the independent courts and robust free press, assigned to uphold and speak out for these rights. Representing over 20% of Israel’s population, Israeli Arab citizens 1 / 3 serve as judges, ambassadors, legislators, journalists, professors, artists and play prominent roles in all aspects of Israeli society.
    [Show full text]
  • World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance
    1 World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance Declaration Having met in Durban, South Africa, from 31 August to 8 September 2001, Expressing deep appreciation to the Government of South Africa for hosting this World Conference, Drawing inspiration from the heroic struggle of the people of South Africa against the institutionalized system of apartheid, as well as for equality and justice under democracy, development, the rule of law and respect for human rights, recalling in this context the important contribution to that struggle of the international community and, in particular, the pivotal role of the people and Governments of Africa, and noting the important role that different actors of civil society, including non-governmental organizations, played in that struggle and in ongoing efforts to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Recalling that the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights in June 1993, calls for the speedy and comprehensive elimination of all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Recalling Commission on Human Rights resolution 1997/74 of 18 April 1997, General Assembly resolution 52/111 of 12 December 1997 and subsequent resolutions of those bodies concerning the convening of the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance and recalling also the two World Conferences to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination,
    [Show full text]