The Second Palestinian Intifada a Chronicle of a People’S Struggle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Second Palestinian Intifada a Chronicle of a People’S Struggle The Second Palestinian Intifada A Chronicle of a People’s Struggle RAMZY BAROUD Foreword by Kathleen and Bill Christison Introduction by Jennifer Loewenstein Photographs by Mahfouz Abu Turk and Matthew Cassel Pluto P Press LONDON • ANN ARBOR, MI BBaroudaroud 0000 pprere iiiiii 226/4/066/4/06 008:05:128:05:12 First published 2006 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA and 839 Greene Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 www.plutobooks.com Copyright © Ramzy Baroud 2006 The right of Ramzy Baroud to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 7453 2548 3 hardback ISBN 0 7453 2547 5 paperback Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data applied for 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Designed and produced for Pluto Press by Chase Publishing Services Ltd, Fortescue, Sidmouth, EX10 9QG, England Typeset from disk by Stanford DTP Services, Northampton, England Printed and bound in the United States of America by Maple-Vail Book Manufacturing Group BBaroudaroud 0000 pprere iivv 226/4/066/4/06 008:05:128:05:12 To Zarefah, Iman, and Sammy, my life’s inspiration BBaroudaroud 0000 pprere v 226/4/066/4/06 008:05:128:05:12 Contents Foreword by Kathleen and Bill Christison viii Preface xiii Acknowledgements xvii Introduction by Jennifer Loewenstein 1 1 The Intifada Takes Off (2000–01) 16 2 Intifada International (2002) 36 3 Calls for Reform (2003) 53 4 Profound Changes, Insurmountable Challenges (2004) 90 5 End of the Intifada? (2005) 120 Epilogue 158 Appendix I Total Deaths and Other Losses During the Second Palestinian Uprising 166 Appendix II Timeline of Events During the Second Palestinian Uprising: 2000–05 168 Notes 196 Recommended Reading 207 Notes on Contributors 208 Index 210 BBaroudaroud 0000 pprere vviiii 226/4/066/4/06 008:05:128:05:12 Foreword Kathleen and Bill Christison In a poignant piece included in this book, Ramzy Baroud tells the story of his grandfather, a refugee from the Palestinian village of Beit Daras who spent nearly 40 years until his death at a very old age in a Gaza refugee camp constantly listening to a transistor radio, hoping that someday it would bring the news that Palestinian refugees would be allowed to return to their homes, lost in 1948 when Israel was created and 750,000 Palestinians were forced from their homes.1 Ramzy’s grandfather, like the Palestinian people themselves, lived in what might be called a state of suspended animation, wrapped in memory, holding before him a vision of Palestine that would never be recreated. His long but ultimately, for him, fruitless vigil symbolizes at once the tragedy of the Palestinian people and their great strength. A predominant, and perhaps the most salient, feature of the history of Zionism and the establishment of Israel as a Jewish state has been the Zionist effort to ignore—and therefore ultimately to erase from the political landscape—the Palestinian people who were native to the land that became Israel. Throughout the nearly 60 years since Israel’s creation and the Palestinians’ dispossession, and for the several decades before this when Zionism was gaining strength, Zionists and their supporters in the United States and Europe have made a concerted effort to dehumanize the Palestinians, render them invisible, and delegitimize them as true claimants to a national life in Palestine. From the Balfour Declaration pledging British support for a “Jewish national home” in Palestine, at a time when Palestinians made up 90 percent of the population; through the United Nations decision 30 years later to partition Palestine and give the Zionists over half the territory for a Jewish state, when Jews constituted no more than one-third of the population and owned only 7 percent of the land; through the Palestinians’ decades of statelessness and displacement following 1948; to the Second Palestinian Uprising, the most recent of the Palestinians’ struggles to assert their right to independence and self-governance in their own homeland, Zionism has persuaded much of the world that the Palestinians’ presence in and claim to the land of Palestine are of no consequence. viii BBaroudaroud 0000 pprere vviiiiii 226/4/066/4/06 008:05:128:05:12 Foreword ix The effort to ignore Palestinians continues unabated, even into the twenty-fi rst century. As the years have passed, it has become ever easier for people the world over, as well as for politicians and policymakers, to forget the Palestinians because they do not constitute a state (or an effective political lobby), and, in a cruel vicious circle, the longer Palestinian national aspirations are ignored, the less their claim to any kind of national sovereignty is seen as legitimate. A body of assumptions and misconceptions has grown up, centering on the notions that Israel is the victim, that Palestinians have no rational basis for their hostility to Israel, and that the only real issue is Palestinian hatred of Jews and refusal to accept Israel’s existence. These very fundamental misperceptions have never been adequately challenged and, with the passage of time, have become more widespread and fi rmly entrenched. As misperception has built on misperception, it has become easier for Israel to justify pushing the Palestinians aside, ever more openly oppressing the whole Palestinian population, and for the world to look away. Each Palestinian uprising, each attempt to assert a national right, seems to strengthen an ever-growing belief that Palestinians have no inherent rights in Palestine and are driven only by hatred of Jews to contest what is widely thought to be the Jews’ inherent right to patrimony there. Few remember, because it is now inconvenient to remember, that Ramzy Baroud’s grandfather and 750,000 other innocent civilians were displaced nearly 60 years ago and that their descendants still live under oppression and in exile. The body of misperceptions surrounding the Palestinians has not simply grown haphazardly, but has been carefully shaped and nurtured by a skillful pro-Israeli propaganda machine that operates around the world but primarily in the United States. As a result, the U.S.—from the public to the media to politicians and policymakers— has completely bought into the images of Israelis as innocent victims and Palestinians as unworthy of more than secondary consideration. This set of images, and the political mindset that accompanies them, has grown cumulatively with time, gradually blotting out the historical record, blurring memory, and creating what passes for political reality, until the prevailing mindset has become so dominant that few challenge it. What was once a tacit U.S. acceptance of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem and its undemocratic dominance over the territories’ three million Palestinians has become under President George W. Bush an eager endorsement of Israel’s policies. The growing U.S. inability to view the confl ict from any but BBaroudaroud 0000 pprere iixx 226/4/066/4/06 008:05:128:05:12 x Foreword Israel’s perspective, and the Bush administration’s outright animus toward the Palestinians, have opened the door to unrestrained Israeli oppression of the Palestinians. If it was not clear before, it is now indisputable that Israel’s actions are designed, with U.S. concurrence, to erase the Palestinians as a people and a national entity. Israeli settlements encircle Palestinian towns and cities. Israeli roads cut through Palestinian agricultural land, separating one town from another and preventing any Palestinian growth. The separation wall winds through the West Bank, destroying or confi scating prime Palestinian agricultural land and fresh water wells, razing thousands of Palestinian olive trees, destroying Palestinian markets and halting commerce, demolishing homes, separating children from schools and adults from workplaces, totally severing East Jerusalem from the West Bank, leaving Jerusalem Palestinians with no hinterland and West Bankers with no capital and no religious or civic center. Israeli tanks occupy Palestinian cities; Israeli bulldozers demolish Palestinian homes; Israeli authorities confi scate Palestinian residency permits; most maps published in Israel depict the West Bank and Gaza as part of Israel. Gaza is caged and in ruins, worse than Dresden of 1945. The Israeli occupation army has demolished every Palestinian government and security headquarters building throughout the West Bank and Gaza, ransacked every Palestinian civilian ministry, even destroyed Palestinian census records and land registry records. What is the Israeli purpose here other than to erase all trace of Palestinian existence? The Palestinian–Israeli confl ict has gone beyond being a mere political problem, beyond the stuff of cool political debate. It is a human disaster that can no longer be treated with dispassion, no longer addressed by an equal weighing of rights and wrongs on both sides. The Israeli appropriation of the Palestinians’ land, livelihood, and very existence is terrorist violence, as surely as any suicide bombing is terrorism. The massive difference between the terrorism of the two sides, however, is that one employs a few youth to express an entire people’s rage through individual acts of murder, while the other employs the vast military power of a strong nation to smother another people. There is another critical difference: in international media coverage of
Recommended publications
  • A Special Kind of Exile by Alice Rothchild, M.D
    Published by Americans for The Link Middle East Understanding, Inc. Volume 48, Issue 4 Link Archives: www.ameu.org September-October 2015 A Special Kind of Exile By Alice Rothchild, M.D. I once heard a speaker refer to those Jews who engage in critical activ- ism on Israel/Palestine as entering a “special kind of exile.” I started my life in a very traditional American Jewish place, but faced with the activism of the 1960s, Israel’s increasingly belligerent occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem, multiple hard- to-defend wars, and a growing awareness of “cross sectional” issues around racism, police brutality, militarism, and U.S. for- eign policy, I was forced to re-examine much that my family once held dear and to face the consequences of my actions. As an increasingly secular person, I also began to scrutinize the meaning of my Jewishness, the uncomfortable consequences of Zionism, and my per- sonal responsibilities in a world rife with contradiction, fear, and conflict. So how did that all happen and where am I now? (Continued on Page 2) The Link Page 2 AMEU Board (Continued from Page 1) of Directors About This A Special Kind of Exile Jane Adas (Vice President) Issue By Alice Rothchild Elizabeth D. Barlow Edward Dillon I first heard Dr. Rothchild The Jewish Story Rod Driver speak earlier this year at a confer- I was once on track to be a nice Jew- ence in Washington D.C. co- John Goelet ish girl, growing up in the small New sponsored by the Washington Re- David Grimland port on Middle East Affairs England town of Sharon, Massachusetts, Richard Hobson (Treasurer) (WRMEA) and the Institute for with liberal minded parents who fled the Anne R.
    [Show full text]
  • Structures of Settler Colonial Domination in Israel and in the United States
    Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society Vol. 6, No. 1, 2017, pp. 29-44 Structures of settler colonial domination in Israel and in the United States Johanna Fernandez Introduction In March 2016, a U.S. delegation traveled to Palestine to witness firsthand Israel’s settler- colonial project and to stand in solidarity with an Indigenous people’s diverse struggles for survival. Like many others who have traveled internationally to advance the cause of justice, we went to uphold one of humanity’s highest principles and aspirations—the notion that we should care for the freedom of others, be willing to stand with them, and bring home their voices and messages. Our nineteen-member delegation included three former U.S.-held political prisoners, two former Black Panthers, trade unionists, university professors, and a younger generation of prison abolitionists and organizers. The trip was planned and led by Dr. Rabab Abdulhadi, the indefatigable author and professor at San Francisco State University, who identified prisons, labor, and academic freedom as the delegation's focal points. We met and documented conversations with teachers and labor organizers whose recent strikes highlighted the savage economic disparities that define Palestinian life; we learned about the ongoing efforts of activists and scholars to reclaim the history, political identity, and culture of the Palestinian people. The delegation’s special focus on political imprisonment and solidarity between Palestinian and U.S. prisoners made it the first of its kind. The injustices we witnessed in Palestine—of ongoing Palestinian displacement and demolition of homes by the Israeli state, of attempts at dehumanizing the Palestinian people through educational policies designed to erase their culture and history, of stark economic disparities between Palestinians and Israelis, of 2017 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Trauma in Waltz with Bashir and Lebanon
    Anna Ball 1 ‘Looking the Beast in the Eye’: Screening Trauma in Waltz With Bashir and Lebanon Published in The Ethics of Representation in Literature, Art and Journalism: Transnational Responses to the Siege of Beirut, ed. Caroline Rooney and Rita Sakr (London: Routledge, 2013), pp.71-85. PRE-PRINT PROOF: PLEASE REFER TO PRINTED VERSION FOR CITATION Anna Ball, [email protected] Having looked the beast of the past in the eye, having asked and received forgiveness and made amends, let us shut the door on the past – not in order to forget it but in order not to allow it to imprison us. - Archbishop Desmond Tutu, South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report.i [Figure 1: Image from Waltz With Bashir, dir. Ari Folman (London: Artificial Eye, 2008).] It is the kind of place that we have all visited in our dreams: somewhere that at first seems drearily familiar, a nocturnal cityscape perhaps, streets littered and rain-sodden. Until you see the sky. Not black but a lurid yellow: a sickly light, the colour of phosphorous, an unnatural illumination of the darkness. Then, as you knew they would, they come, all twenty-six of them, snarling and slathering, sleek black coats gleaming in the rain, eyes bright as flares. All Anna Ball 2 night, they circle beneath your window, howl at you through your restless sleep, and though in the morning they will be gone, as dreams always are, you know that they will return – for this is what it is to be hunted by this particular kind of beast.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamas and Fateh Neck and Neck As Palestinian Elections Near
    OPINION OFFICE OF ANALYSIS RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, DC 20520 January 19, 2005 M-05-06 Hamas and Fateh Neck and Neck As Palestinian Elections Near A just-completed Office of Research survey in the Palestinian Territories shows a much closer race at the polls than some have predicted. Among likely voters, 32 percent intend to back Fateh on the National Ballot, while 30 percent say they will support Hamas. Corruption is the leading issue among the Palestinian public, with most believing that Hamas is more qualified than Fateh to clean it up. While Hamas is seen as less able than Fateh to advance negotiations with Israel, a majority of both Fateh and Hamas supporters back a continuation of the ceasefire, ongoing talks with Israel, and a two-state solution. The survey, conducted January 13-15, indicates that eight-in-ten among the electorate are either “very likely” (53%) or “somewhat likely” (28%) to vote on the National Ballot in the January 25th elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council. Among likely voters, about a third each intend to vote for Hamas and Fateh (Table 1). Independent Palestine, led by Mustafa Bhargouti, is backed by 13 percent of likely voters. Based on these results, Fateh would gain roughly 24 of the 66 National Ballot seats, Hamas 22 seats, Independent Palestine 9 seats, with the remaining 11 split among smaller parties. These results show a closer race than other published surveys of likely voters, which have tended to place Fateh ahead at the polls by a wider margin (Appendix, Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Global Movement: a Framework for Today’S Anti-Apartheid Activism
    Grassroots Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign Towards a Global Movement: A framework for today’s anti-apartheid activism June 2007 ii Abstract Building and strengthening a global boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement has become a core aim for many involved in today’s solidarity work for Palestine. This report assesses the current state of the BDS movements – within the general context of Palestine solidarity work – and makes recommendations for improvement. Developing clarity, cohesion and coordination across the numerous local and national initiatives, campaigns and movements from around the world is crucial if solidarity is to be more effective. Our discussion and framework for action explores the central issues pertaining to any BDS strategy and sets out how global activism can have an important role to play in advancing the Palestinian cause and struggle. Reflections upon previous BDS strategies used to isolate Israel, from within and outside the Middle East, are explored together with a comprehensive study of the campaigns pursued by the anti-apartheid movement against South Africa. An evaluation seeks to learn from past BDS experiences and the implications for Palestine campaign work today. The findings are addressed to solidarity movements, trade unions and social justice organizations around the world, with the intention of creating stronger global networks and alliances with Palestine at a grassroots and civil society level. Moreover, they build upon the Palestinian Call (2005) for BDS as a means of support for
    [Show full text]
  • Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism
    Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism By Matthew W. Horton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Dr. Na’ilah Nasir, Chair Dr. Daniel Perlstein Dr. Keith Feldman Summer 2019 Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions Matthew W. Horton 2019 ABSTRACT Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism by Matthew W. Horton Doctor of Philosophy in Education and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory University of California, Berkeley Professor Na’ilah Nasir, Chair This dissertation is an intervention into Critical Whiteness Studies, an ‘additional movement’ to Ethnic Studies and Critical Race Theory. It systematically analyzes key contradictions in working against racism from a white subject positions under post-Civil Rights Movement liberal color-blind white hegemony and "Black Power" counter-hegemony through a critical assessment of two major competing projects in theory and practice: white anti-racism [Part 1] and New Abolitionism [Part 2]. I argue that while white anti-racism is eminently practical, its efforts to hegemonically rearticulate white are overly optimistic, tend toward renaturalizing whiteness, and are problematically dependent on collaboration with people of color. I further argue that while New Abolitionism has popularized and advanced an alternative approach to whiteness which understands whiteness as ‘nothing but oppressive and false’ and seeks to ‘abolish the white race’, its ultimately class-centered conceptualization of race and idealization of militant nonconformity has failed to realize effective practice.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    6th Meeting of PGA’s Working Group on the Universality of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in the Middle East and North Africa 15-16 October 2014 Parliament of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Amman, Jordan List of Participants PARLIAMENTARIANS 7. H. E. Dr. Hani Mulki IRAQ Member of the Arab and International 1. Mr. Fahk el Sheikh Ali, MP Affairs and Expatriates Committee Civil Alliance 8. H. E. ENG. Hashem Shboul JORDAN Member of the Arab and International 2. Mr. Atef Yousef Saleh Tarawneh Affairs and Expatriates Committee Speaker of the House of Representatives 9. H. E. Mr. Saleh Al-Kalab Senate Member of the Arab and International 3. Mr. Mohammed Samid Al Raqqad Affairs and Expatriates Committee Chairman of the Legal Committee 10. H.E. ENG. Alaa Batayneh 4. Mr. Samir Al Rifai Member of the Arab and International Chairman of the Arab and International Affairs and Expatriates Committee Affairs and Expatriates Committee 11. H. E. Dr. Kamal Barham 5. H. E. Mr. Hasan Abu Nimah Member of the Legal Committee Member of the Arab and International Affairs and Expatriates Committee 12. H. E. Mr. Ousama Melkawi Member of the Legal Committee 6. H. E. Mr. Adeel Irshaid Member of the Arab and International 13. H. E. Mr. Mohammad Eid Bundukji Affairs and Expatriates Committee Member of the Legal Committee 1 OMAN 14. H. E. Mr. Abdallah Al Oyoun 26. Mr. Alhinai Zahran, MP Member of the Legal Committee Chairman, Defense and Security Committee, Majlis A'shura 15. H. E. Mr. Abdeebjalamdeh Member of the Legal Committee 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Views Or Conclusions
    The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 181 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 181 The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel. 972-3-5318959 Fax. 972-3-5359195 [email protected] www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 October 2020 Cover image: Sheri Hooley via Unsplash The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is an independent, non-partisan think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. It is named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace laid the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re-publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Publication of a work by BESA signifies that it is deemed worthy of public consideration but does not imply endorsement of the author’s views or conclusions. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Beit Sahour City Profile
    Beit Sahour City Profile Prepared by The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Funded by Spanish Cooperation Azahar Program 2010 Palestinian Localities Study Bethlehem Governorate Acknowledgments ARIJ hereby expresses its deep gratitude to the Spanish agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) for their funding of this project through the Azahar Program. ARIJ is grateful to the Palestinian officials in the ministries, municipalities, joint services councils, village committees and councils, and the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) for their assistance and cooperation with the project team members during the data collection process. ARIJ also thanks all the staff who worked throughout the past couple of years towards the accomplishment of this work. 1 Palestinian Localities Study Bethlehem Governorate Background This booklet is part of a series of booklets, which contain compiled information about each city, town, and village in Bethlehem Governorate. These booklets came as a result of a comprehensive study of all localities in Bethlehem Governorate, which aims at depicting the overall living conditions in the governorate and presenting developmental plans to assist in developing the livelihood of the population in the area. It was accomplished through the "Village Profiles and Azahar Needs Assessment;" the project funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) and the Azahar Program. The "Village Profiles and Azahar Needs Assessment" was designed to study, investigate, analyze and document the socio-economic conditions and the needed programs and activities to mitigate the impact of the current unsecure political, economic and social conditions in Bethlehem Governorate with particular focus on the Azahar program objectives and activities concerning water, environment, and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2008 WD (Lebanon – Palestinian – ANO
    WD (Lebanon – Palestinian – ANO – risk) Lebanon CG [2008] UKAIT 00047 Asylum and Immigration Tribunal THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House On 6 & 7 March 2008 Before Senior Immigration Judge Allen Senior Immigration Judge Eshun Mrs G Greenwood Between WD Appellant and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent Representation : For the Appellant: Mr D Blum, Counsel, instructed by Knights Solicitors For the Respondent: Mr G Saunders, Home Office Presenting Officer DETERMINATION AND REASONS The Abu Nidal Organisation (“ANO”) exists now as no more than separate cells and individuals operating on their own, and hence is very unlikely to pose a real threat to an individual who has in the past been the object of its hostility. 1. The appellant is a Palestinian, a former resident in Lebanon. He appealed to an Adjudicator against the Secretary of State's decision of 11 August 2004 to remove him as an illegal entrant from the United Kingdom. In a determination promulgated on 16 December 2004 the Adjudicator dismissed his appeal. The appellant subsequently sought permission to appeal to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. A Vice President refused permission on 22 February 2005. The appellant thereafter sought statutory review, and on 7 April 2005 Silber J reversed the decision of the Tribunal refusing leave. The appeal then came before a panel of the AIT on 9 May 2006 as a reconsideration of the Adjudicator's decision. The Tribunal did not find © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2008 1 there to be a material error of law in the Adjudicator's decision and accordingly ordered that his decision dismissing the appeal was to stand.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser
    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: The Most Important Events Yasser Arafat Foundation 1 Early 20th Century - The total population of Palestine is estimated at 600,000, including approximately 36,000 of the Jewish faith, most of whom immigrated to Palestine for purely religious reasons, the remainder Muslims and Christians, all living and praying side by side. 1901 - The Zionist Organization (later called the World Zionist Organization [WZO]) founded during the First Zionist Congress held in Basel Switzerland in 1897, establishes the “Jewish National Fund” for the purpose of purchasing land in Palestine. 1902 - Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II agrees to receives Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement and, despite Herzl’s offer to pay off the debt of the Empire, decisively rejects the idea of Zionist settlement in Palestine. - A majority of the delegates at The Fifth Zionist Congress view with favor the British offer to allocate part of the lands of Uganda for the settlement of Jews. However, the offer was rejected the following year. 2 1904 - A wave of Jewish immigrants, mainly from Russia and Poland, begins to arrive in Palestine, settling in agricultural areas. 1909 Jewish immigrants establish the city of “Tel Aviv” on the outskirts of Jaffa. 1914 - The First World War begins. - - The Jewish population in Palestine grows to 59,000, of a total population of 657,000. 1915- 1916 - In correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, wherein Hussein demands the “independence of the Arab States”, specifying the boundaries of the territories within the Ottoman rule at the time, which clearly includes Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Conference Conf Erencia
    conference FOOD AND AGRICULTUREORGANIZATION OF 1BE UNITED NA TIONS C conference C 93/INF/3 - Rev. 2 ORGANISATIONDES NATIONS UNIE8 POUR L'ALIMENTATION ET L'AGRICULTURE conferencia 16 November 1993 ORGANIZACION DE LAS NACIONESUNIDAS PARA LA AGIUCULTIJRAY LA AUMENTACION Twmty-sevmth Session Vingt-septiene session 27° penodo desesicmes TWENTY-SEVENTH SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE Rome, 6 - 25 November 1993 � I .,_.JIJ Ji>.H � "t.......,4 � j.e � IJ (\ 0 .,. • � L..JI I\ � � y/\ \I\ "\ u-i) 11: * fY �£ � tn, r[ffi et � -AA (�.Lt.19931Fll,Ji16815�) PROVISIONAL UST OF DELEGATES AND OBSERVERS (as of 16 November 1993, 15.00 hours) USTE PROVISOIRE DES DELEGUES ET OBSERVATEURS (Au 16 novembre 1993, a 15.00 heures) LISTA PROVISIONAL DE DELEGADOS Y OBSERVADORES (Al 16 de noviembre de 1993, alas 15.00 oras) •�->"C :E $ Chairman President : Seymour MULLINGS (Jamaica) Presidente � ->'I '-:-I I_,;a li� :E $ Vice-Chairmen : MAJID-UL-HAQ (Bangladesh) Vice-Presidents : Jacques LAUREAU (France) Vicepresidentes : Waleed A. ELKHEREUI (Saudi Arabia, Kingdom ot) :(�.,.,..._....n) 4:H_,.a.llm-11 �_,.:,JI�� � �J * Registered + Accompanied by Spouse Inscrit Accompagne(e) par Conjoint(e) Registrado Acompafiado(a) por su conyuge � [. J _)JI ili .M B!!ic Eb !le114 � ioJ WIT 1560 - 1 - -�ii J�� mt in 00 MEMBER NATIONS ETATS MEMBRES ESTADOS MIEMBROS AFGHANISTAN - AFGANISTAN ALBANIA - ALBANIE Delegate Delegue * Sayed Noorullah EMAD * Hasan HALILI Minister for Agriculture and Agrarian Reform Ministre de !'agriculture et Kabul de l'alimentation Tirana Alternates * Saheb Dad P AKTEEN Suppleants - President of Development * Edmond DULAJ Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform Ambassadeur Kabul Rome * Abdul Habib NOWROZ * Haxhi ALIKO President Depute Institute of Veterinary Biologicals Tirana Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform Kabul * Gezim KOMNINO Troisieme secretaire * Sayed SADI NADERI Arnbassade d' Albanie Minister Counsellor Rome Charge d'affairs a.i.
    [Show full text]