DOCSLIB.ORG

Danube River Again Open for Navigation at Novi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Danube River Again Open for Navigation at Novi ,3 Brussels, 29 November 2001 'DQXEH5LYHUDJDLQRSHQIRUQDYLJDWLRQDW1RYL6DG 7ZR \HDUV DIWHU WKH 1$72 ERPELQJ RI WKUHH EULGJHV DW 1RYL 6DG LQ WKH )HGHUDO 5HSXEOLF RI <XJRVODYLD )5< WKH 'DQXEH &RPPLVVLRQ KDV DQQRXQFHGLQ%XGDSHVWWRGD\WKDWUHJXODUQDYLJDWLRQRQWKH'DQXEHLVRQFH DJDLQSRVVLEOH7KH(XURSHDQ&RPPLVVLRQ VILQDQFLDOVXSSRUWRIVRPH¼P KDV EHHQ LQVWUXPHQWDO LQ DFKLHYLQJ WKLV $ VDIH FKDQQHO IRU QDYLJDWLRQ D SURYLVLRQDO IDLUZD\ KDV EHHQ HVWDEOLVKHG DQG PDUNHG WKURXJK WKH 1RYL 6DGVWUHWFKRIWKH'DQXEH Agreement has been reached, with the support of the European Commission, between the Danube Commission and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) on the schedule of opening of the pontoon bridge at Novi Sad, the last remaining obstacle to navigation, and on the charges to be levied on shipping. The President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi, said: 7KLVLVYHU\JRRGQHZVIRU(XURSHDQVDQGWKHLUHQYLURQPHQW7KH'DQXEHLVDJUHDW (XURSHDQ ULYHU IORZLQJ WKURXJK SUHVHQW DQG IXWXUH 0HPEHU 6WDWHV 7KH (XURSHDQ 8QLRQ H[LVWV WR KHDO WKH ZRXQGV RI WKH SDVW DQG EXLOG D EHWWHU IXWXUH IRU DOO (XURSHDQV7KLVVKRZVZKDWZHFDQDFKLHYHZKHQZHZRUNWRJHWKHU Chris Patten, the EU Commissioner for External Relations, said: ³7KLV HYHQW PDUNV D JUHDW VWHS IRUZDUG ±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of 24.05.2000 Commission adopts proposal to fund Danube clearance The tenders for the remaining stages of the clearance operation - removal of any unexploded ordnance and the remaining debris of the bridges, so as to clear the entire width of the river - are being published by the Danube Commission. That work, and any necessary work on the riverbed itself, will not interfere with navigation, and will be completed once weather conditions permit, in 2002. Now that the river is once again open to navigation, the European Commission intends to propose EC funding for the reconstruction of the Sloboda Bridge in Novi Sad. 2 %DFNJURXQG 'DQXEH&RPPLVVLRQ The Danube Commission is an international organisation, based in Budapest, with responsibility for navigation on the Danube (under i.a. the 1948 Belgrade Convention). It has 11 members (the riverine states of the Danube - Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Moldova, Romania, Slovak Republic, Ukraine - plus Russia) and operates by unanimity. In their capacity as the organisation with responsibility for navigation, they developed a project for the clearance of the river Danube (removal of debris and ordnance, restoration of a navigable channel and restoration of the riverbed and banks along the 5km stretch of the Danube, at Novi Sad), in late 1999. Following its adoption on 25 January 2000 it was presented to the European Commission and other potential donors. (XURSHDQ&RPPLVVLRQ VLQYROYHPHQW In contacts from autumn 1999 onwards, the European Commission provided advice on the development of the project. When it was formally presented with the project in late January 2000, it provided a detailed analysis and, following some further necessary decisions (Rules of the International Fund into which contributions would be made, and the Rules of the Project Management), by the Danube Commission on 17 May 2000, the European Commission immediately (24 May), the European Commission adopted a proposal, on 24 May 2000, that EC funding should be given (to the maximum of 85% / ¼PRIWKHWRWDOHVWLPDWHGFRVWRI¼P 7KH&RXQFLO of Ministers, after consulting the European Parliament, took their decision on 17 July 2000, following which the Commission ensured that EC funds were immediately available for transfer to the International Fund for the Clearance of the Fairway of the Danube. This International Fund was established by the Danube Commission, under Austrian law, in late summer 2000. The European Commission had also, in contacts with the former FRY authorities, overcome difficulties relating to the impact of the sanctions against that regime and, immediately after the democratic changes in Belgrade in October 2000, urged the new authorities to alter the previous regime's obstructive attitude within the Danube Commission. Since then, the European Commission has worked closely with the Danube Commission to overcome various obstacles which have arisen. Thanks to the support of Yugoslav Federal Deputy Prime Minister Labus, and the cooperation of Novi Sad authorities, these have been overcome. 2WKHUVSRQVRUV Other than the Danube Commission and its Project Director, the European Commission as the main financial and political backer, and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia as the state where the project is to be implemented, a number of other states are involved as financial contributors. Apart from the EC' s ¼PFRQWULEXWLRQ to the Danube Commission's International Fund for the Clearance of the Fairway of the Danube, contributions have also been made by Bulgaria (¼P &DQDGD (¼ &URDWLD ¼P *HUPDQ\ ¼P +XQJDU\ ¼P WKH 1HWKHUODQGV (¼P $XVWULD ¼P 5RPDQLD ¼P 5XVVLD ¼ 6ORYDN5HSXEOLF (¼P 6ZLW]HUODQG ¼ 8NUDLQH ¼P 3 6WDELOLW\3DFW The EC-backed project of the Danube Commission is one of those included in the Stability Pact's list of Quick Start Package projects. 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Budapest to Bucharest Danube River Cruise
    BUDAPEST TO BUCHAREST DANUBE Program Guide RIVER CRUISE August 20-29, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Before You Go ....................................................... 3-4 Getting There ......................................................... 5-6 Program Information .............................................. 7-9 Omissions Waiver .................................................. 9 Amenities & Services ............................................. 10-12 Frequently Asked Questions .................................. 13-14 Itinerary .................................................................. 15-16 BEFORE YOU GO PERSONAL TRAVEL DOCUMENTS Passport: A passport that is valid for at least six (6) months after your return date is required for this program. Visas: U.S. and Canadian citizens do not need visas for countries visited. Other nationalities should consult the local embassies or consulates for visa requirements. All documentation required for this itinerary is the sole responsibility of the guest. Brand g will not be responsible for advising and/or obtaining required travel documentation for any passenger, or for any delays, damages, and/or losses, including missed portions of your trip, related to improper or absent travel documentation. It is suggested that copies of important documents, including your passport and visas, be kept in a separate place, in case the originals are lost or stolen. Travel Protection: While travel insurance is not required to participate in this program, Brand g strongly recommends that each guest purchase
    [Show full text]
  • Treating Two 18Th Century Maps of the Danube in Association with Google-Provided Imagery
    ON THE DIGITAL REVIVAL OF HISTORIC CARTOGRAPHY: TREATING TWO 18TH CENTURY MAPS OF THE DANUBE IN ASSOCIATION WITH GOOGLE-PROVIDED IMAGERY Evangelos Livieratos Angeliki Tsorlini Maria Pazarli [email protected] Chrysoula Boutoura Myron Myridis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Faculty of Surveying Engineering University Campus, Box 497 GRE - 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece Abstract The great navigable Danube River (known as the Istros River to the Ancient Greeks and as one of the crucial ends of the Roman Empire northern territories) is an emblematic fluvial feature of the overall European historic and cultural heritage in the large. Originating in the German Black Forest as two small rivers (Brigach and Breg) converging at the town of Donaueschingen, Danube is flowing for almost 2850 km mainly eastwards, passing through ten states (Germany, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine) and four European capitals (Vienna, Bratislava, Budapest and Belgrade) with embouchure in the west coasts of the Black Sea via the Danube Delta, mainly in Romania. Danube played a profound role in the European political, social, economic and cultural history influencing in a multifold manner the heritage of many European nations, some of those without even a physical connection with the River, as it is the case of the Greeks, to whom the Danube is a reference to their own 18th century Enlightenment movement. Due to Danube’s important role in History, the extensive emphasis to its cartographic depiction was obviously a conditio sine qua non especially in the 17th and 18th century European cartography. In this paper, taking advantage of the modern digital technologies as applied in the recently established domain of cartographic heritage, two important and historically significant 18th century maps of the Danube are comparatively discussed in view also to the reference possibilities available today in relevant studies by the digital maps offered by powerful providers as e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Water Management in the Danube River Basin
    TransboundaryTransboundary WaterWater ManagementManagement inin thethe DanubeDanube RiverRiver BasinBasin OvidiuOvidiu GABORGABOR DeputyDeputy GeneralGeneral DirectorDirector NationalNational AdminstrationAdminstration ““ApeleApele RomaneRomane”” Content Presentation • Danube River Basin • Transboundary Water Management • Joint Action Program • WFD Implementation • Flood Action Program • Transboundary Cooperation within Danube Basin- examples The Danube River Basin • 800.000 km2 • 81 million people • 13 countries (+5) About Romania • 97.8 % of the RO surface is included in the DRB • 30 % of the DRB surface is in Romania •27 % of the DRB population is leaving in Romania Transboundary Danube Water Management - Constraints Î Regional social and economic disparities Î The particular situation of transition countries and the requirements for EU accession Î Major tributaries are transboundary rivers Countries in the Danube River Basin Small territories Germany Croatia Austria Serbia & Muntenegro Switzerland Czech Republic Bulgaria Italy Slovak Republic Romania Poland Hungary Moldova Albania Slovenia Ukraine Macedonia Bosnia-Herzegovina European Commission ICPDR 6 MAIN WATER MANAGEMENT GOAL ASSURE THE PROTECTION OF WATER AND ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DANUBE RIVER BASIN 7 DWM Policies & Actions Joint Action Programme WFD Implementation Flood Action Programme JAP Policies and Strategies Î River Basin Management and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive; Î Emission inventory and pollution reduction; Î Restoration
    [Show full text]
  • Sava River Basin Project
    Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains International (WI) with technical support from Orbicon (DK) have jointly initiated the Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains project to support the Sava Basin countries in identifying, designating and managing the biological and landscape diversity along the Sava River and in supporting the implementation of the EU Birds and Habitats Directives. The proposed project will demonstrate innovative protection and management schemes that seek to combine viable land use practices, biodiversity protection and management and flood management. Du{ka Dimovi} Donors and Partners The project is financially supported by the LIFE-Third countries programme and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. The international project applicant responsible for Lonjsko polje Nature Park, Croatia / Park, Croatia Lonjsko polje Nature executing the project is IUCN Regional The Sava River found in the central Sava basin with a Office for Europe. Throughout the mosaic of natural floodplains and project, the IUCN together with the WI The Sava River is the second largest cultural landscapes formed by will be responsible for the project tributary to the Danube River and is of traditional land-use patterns typical to management, while the partner institu- biological significance because of its the river valleys of Central Europe in the tions from the Sava countries - the outstanding biological and landscape past. The Sava River is considered by Center for Ecology and Natural diversity. It hosts the largest complex of nature conservationists and scientists to Resources of the Faculty of Science in alluvial floodplain wetlands in the be one of the “Crown Jewels” of Sarajevo, the Agricultural Institute of Danube basin and the largest lowland European nature and has been selected Republic of Srpska, the State Institute forests.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVI SAD - City Case Report City Development and Its Subsurface
    COST-SUBURBAN WG1 - NOVI SAD - City Case report City development and its subsurface University of Novi Sad Faculty of Technical Sciences Department of Traffic and Transportation Authors: Đurđica Stojanović, Marko Veličković In cooperation with: Ildiko Otašević, Public Enterprise for City Construction and Development, Novi Sad Aleksandar Jevđenić, Milan Šešum, Public enterprise "Urbanizam", Novi Sad Contents 1. Historical development of the city ................................................................. 3 2. City description ............................................................................................. 6 2.1 City location and key data.................................................................................. 6 2.2 Petrovaradin Fortress ........................................................................................ 7 3. Area characteristics ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 Geology .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Pedology .......................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Geomorphology ............................................................................................... 13 3.4 Groundwater .................................................................................................... 15 4. Urban infrastructure ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Principles and Technical Requirements for Pan-European River Information Services (RIS)
    Common Principles and Technical Requirements for Pan-European River Information Services (RIS) Joint Presentation of the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Serbia Geneva, October 2008 Republic of Croatia Republic of Serbia Content Inland Waterways of the Region Legal Background RIS on the Danube River in Croatia RIS on the Danube River in Serbia RIS on the Sava River APATIN – Joint Critical Section of the Danube River Challenges for the Future Republic of Croatia Republic of Serbia Inland Waterways of the Region Croatia Serbia Total length of the 804.5 979.0 waterways (km) Danube 137.5 588.0 Sava 448.2 207.0 Drava 198.0 Tisza 164.0 Drina 15.0 Kolubara 5.0 Kupa 5.9 Una 15.0 Density of the 11km 12km waterways /1000km2 /1000km2 International ports 4 7 Republic of Croatia Republic of Serbia Inland Waterways of the Region The Danube River Republic of Croatia Republic of Serbia Inland Waterways of the Region Length of the joint sector of the Danube River is 137.5 km Km 1,433.0 Km 1,295.5 Republic of Croatia Republic of Serbia Legal Background There is no bilateral agreement Between Croatia and Serbia, as a platform for technical actions Border line between Croatia and Serbia is not defined Never the less, countries are trying to cooperate in various ways Republic of Croatia Republic of Serbia Legal Background • Croatia - candidate for EU membership • Serbia - Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) signed in 2008, candidacy expected in 2009 EU legislation refer to RIS • Regulations – EC 414/2007 – EC 415/2007 – EC 416/2007 • Directive
    [Show full text]
  • “Protecting Europe's Lifeline
    “Protecting Europe's lifeline - The creation of a Transboundary Biosphere Reserve along the Danube, Drava and Mura Rivers" Duska Dimovic, Arno Mohl, Tamas Gruber and Ivana Korn Varga WWF (www.amazon-of-europe.com, [email protected]) Amazon of Europe Preserving the valuable transboundary living river ecosystems in the Mura-Drava-Danube area Overview (aims, approach/methods, area where project/initiative is undertaken) Strategy 1: Promote establishment of TBR protection status in five countries Transboundary UNESCO Biosphere Reserve “Mura-Drava-Danube“ (TBR MDD) established in 5 countries: Austria, Slovenia, Croatia, Hungary and Serbia 1.000.000 ha riverine and cultural landscape Strategy 2: Facilitate transboundary cooperation and promotion of the MDD area Improved common understanding and transboundary cooperation in the management of the TBR between all 5 countries TBR MDD as a joint trademark for all 5 countries Strategy 3: Promote sustainable river management Prevent deterioration of the river system Support river restoration Transboundary UNESCO Biosphere Reserve “Mura-Drava-Danube“ What are inspiring and innovative solutions for protected areas, arising from the project/initiative? • The UNESCO TBR MDD will be the first in the world in the five countries and will combine the cluster of thirteen protected areas along the Mura-Drava-Danube region and jointly manage the shared river ecosystem in a sustainable manner while promoting the sustainable economic growth and development in the region. • The TBR MDD provides an important
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Macrophytes of the Danube River Near Novi Sad (Yugoslavia, River Km 1255 - 1260)
    Aquatic Macrophytes of the Danube River near Novi Sad (Yugoslavia, river km 1255 - 1260) Janauer, G. A.1, Vukov, D.2, Igic, R.2 With 3 figures and 2 tables in the text Abstract: This study deals with a preliminary investigation of the aquatic vegetation of the Danube system at Novi Sad (Yugoslavia). The macrophyte survey in the main channel of the river and in one small oxbow was performed in 1998. Species richness in this reach of the main channel was intermediate with respect to parts of the river in other countries. The plant mass was very low and very small plant stands were developed. The oxbow is directly connected to the main channel at its lower end, but a considerably higher number of species was present than in the main channel. Again, only very small stands with low biomass were found. This indicates that there are many small niches in the near-bank habitats, but the hydrological dynamics prevent the development of larger vegetation patches. 1 Institute of Ecology and Conservation Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstraβe 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Science, University in Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Yugoslavia. e-mail: [email protected] Introduction The Danube is the second largest river in Europe. Its length is 2850 km and it flows through ten countries (Germany, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Yugoslavia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldavia and Ukraine). This makes it the most important navigational artery of Central and South-Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Danube Region Strategy: Success Stories Table of Content
    PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT CONNECTING THE REGION STRENGTHENING THE REGION DANUBE REGION BUILDING PROSPERITY STRATEGY: SUCCESS STORIES Regional and urban policy DANUBE REGION STRATEGY: SUCCESS STORIES TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION - JOINING FORCES TO STRENGTHEN THE DANUBE REGION ......5 CONNECTING THE REGION ............................................................................................................6 NAVIGATING A UNIQUE EAST-WEST CORRIDOR .....................................................8 LIQUEFIED GAS FIRES UP ALTERNATIVE ENERGY MARKET .............................10 FOSTERING ENERGY SECURITY IN THE DANUBE REGION ...............................12 NATURE KNOWS NO BORDERS ......................................................................................14 PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT ...........................................................................................16 SECURING SAFE AND SUSTAINABLE WATER SUPPLIES ....................................18 A BRIGHTER FUTURE FOR THE REGION'S RIVERS ................................................20 MITIGATING CLIMATE RISKS ...........................................................................................22 SAVING THE DANUBE ‘DINOSAUR’ ..............................................................................24 BUILDING PROSPERITY ................................................................................................................26 MODEL BEHAVIOUR FOR SUSTAINABILITY AND RIVER PROTECTION .........28 INVESTING IN THE FUTURE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
    [Show full text]
  • Lifeline Drava-Mura 2009-2020
    LIFELINE DRAVA-MURA 2009 - 2020 A Plan for Conserving and Restoring the Drava and Mura Rivers for Nature and People This document has been produced by: Ulrich Schwarz, FLUVIUS and Arno Mohl, WWF Austria WWF Austria Ottakringerstrasse 114-116 1160 Vienna, Austria www.wwf.at Konstanzer Str. 22 78315 Radolfzell, Germany www.EuroNatur.org Authors addresses: With contributions from: Cover photos: Dr. Ulrich Schwarz Martin Schneider-Jacoby (EuroNatur), Drava River, children (Credit: A. Mohl/WWF), Sturgeon Gärtnergasse 4/3 Borut Stumberger (DOPPS-Birdlife Slovenia) and (Credit: D.Kaltenegger/4nature), Little Tern (Credit: A-1030 Wien Darko Grlica (Drava League) Roberto Sauli/www.ilsalesullacoda.it) Email: [email protected] Phone: 004369910591384 Proofreading: In cooperation with: Paul Chatterton, WWF Austria DI Arno Mohl Drava League, Green Action, Croatian Society for the WWF Austria Vienna, January 2009 Protection of Birds and Nature, Green Osijek, ZEO Ottakringerstrasse 114-116 Nobilis, ZEUS, Drava Federation and DOPPS-Birdlife A-1160 Vienna Slovenia Email: [email protected] Phone: 004367683488300 Project website: www.sterna-albifrons.net This brochure was published with support of ASAMER Holding ( www.wwf.at/asamer ) Drava Vision 2020 1 Executive summary In order to better preserve the trans-boundary through implementing a trans-boundary “River ecosystem over the long term, innovative Restoration Programme” (RRP) for the Lower Spanning Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Serbia and conservation and management efforts are needed. Drava and Mura. Slovenia, the lower courses of the Drava and Mura Rivers are among Europe’s most An international NGO network – with members This brochure attempts to provide the perspective ecologically important riverine areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management for Inland Navigation on the Danube
    WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR INLAND NAVIGATION ON THE DANUBE Title of Report: Status Report National Frame- work Serbia Work Package 3: Elaborating Ship Waste Management Concepts Activity 3.1: Defining a Common Frame Work Concept Output No: 3.9 Work Package Leader/ Organisation: Dr. Ernö Pal, KTI Activity Leader/ Organisation: Dr. Ernö Pal, KTI Author/Organisation: Maja Jovanovic Author/Organisation: Dusko Isakovic Author/Organisation: Ivan Mitrovic Preparation of Document: October 2009 Version: 01 – Draft version TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................4 (I) GENERAL INFORMATION.............................................................................................................5 (I‐1) INTRODUCTION TO COUNTRY ......................................................................................................5 (I‐2) LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHY........................................................................................................6 (I‐3) INTRODUCTION TO RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES ..........................................................................8 (I‐3‐1) Highest Governmental Authorities in charge of Inland Navigation, Water Management, and Environment Protection...........................................................................................................8 (I‐3‐2) Other Governmental Authorities responsible of Inland Navigation, Water Management, and Environment Protection...........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]