Nova Wakefield District Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nova Wakefield District Limited Nova Wakefield District Limited Minutes of the Annual General Meeting Wednesday 12 October 2016 at 9.30am Unity Works, Westgate, Wakefield, WF1 1EP Present: Mike Holt, Nova Chair – St George's Lupset Limited Mohammed Ayub, Next Generation Wakefield Stephen Ball, Tigers Trust Christine Bann, Eastmoor Community Project Limited Graham Bell, Wakefield District Sight Aid Hazel Bell, Home-Start Wakefield and District Justine Bilton, Carers Wakefield & District Cynthia Binns, Wakefield Rural Arthritis Care Dawn Bland, Spectrum People Eleanor Bradbury, Ryhill and Havercoft Sports and Youth Centre D Butons Emily Castle, Young Lives Consortium Gail Chatterton, Warwick Community Group Ian Cockerill, Nova Wakefield District Limited Jackie Craven, Hall Green Community Association Maureen Cummings, Wakefield Council Robin Davey, Spectrum People Claire Dent, Nova Wakefield District Limited Margaret Dodd, Wakefield Over Fifties Action Group Nichola Esmond, Healthwatch Wakefield Stan Foster, GASPED Stephanie Gibson, Wakefield Council Bridget Gill, Spectrum People Pauline Gill, Warwick Ahead Community Partnership Liz Halliday, Citizens Advice Wakefield District Brian Hamill, Wakefield District City of Sanctuary Alison Haskins, Nova Wakefield District Limited Richard Hodgson, Community Foundation for Wakefield District Trish Hollies, Workers' Educational Association Teresa Holroyd, Spectrum People Mike Holt, St George's Community Centre Tony Howell, Catch a Falling Star Harry Hudson, Foundation Vivian Hughes, St George's Community Centre Tony Jackson, Wakefield College Natalie Jones, Nova Wakefield District Limited Jo Jones, Portfolio Education Limited Tim Larden, Ladbrook Insurance Scott Lupasko, Community Links (Northern) Limited John Major, Community Foundation for Wakefield District Gail Merrifield, Warwick Ahead Community Partnership Anna Middlemiss, Wakefield Council Jeanette Miller, NHS Wakefield CCG Chawapiwa Muverengwi, TAPEPUKA Nova Annual General Meeting 12 October 2016 Page 1 of 3 Nazia Nazir, Pay and Employment Rights Service (Yorkshire) Limited Andrew Nicholls, Horbury Community Centre Trust Karen Nicklin, Nova Wakefield District Limited Berni O'Brien, St George's Community Centre Jo Parkin, Wakefield Council Sonjia Peers, Well Women Centre Helen Rhodes, Nova Wakefield District Limited Vicky Ringer, Nova Wakefield District Limited Valerie Ringer, Levi's Star Children's Brain Tumour Charity Louanne Roberts, SEE Ahead Stephen Robinson, Nova Wakefield District Limited Mary Roche, Nova Wakefield District Limited Antony Sadler, Wakefield Council Louise Smith, Penderels Trust Deborah Smith, SURE Mums Lisa Smith, British Red Cross Ruth Stead, POUCH Claire Stephenson, Wakefield Autism Leisure Club Chris Tatham, West Yorkshire Community Accounting Service Joe Tilston, British Red Cross Mark Upex, Hansons Lesley Wagstaff, St George's Community Centre Lynn Ward, POUCH Natasha Wardle, POUCH Carol White, Nova Wakefield District Limited Lucy Wilkinson, Wakefield Council Izzy Worswick, South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Eileen Worton, Agbrigg and Belle Vue Community Association Doreen Zacharow, Warwick Ahead Community Partnership Apologies: Paula Bee, Age UK Wakefield District Rob Crompton, Foundation Sarah Cutts, Christians Against Poverty Alison Drake, Castleford Heritage Trust Jan Firth, Nova Wakefield District Limited Jean Grasby, Wakefield Talking Newspaper Linda Harris, Spectrum Community Health CIC Kate Honeyman, Wakefield Music Collective Janice James, Wakefield Provider Alliance Elizabeth Jenkins, Wakefield Cathedral Safya Khan, eMBED Health Consortium Diane Knee, Citizens Advice Wakefield District Tom Long, Senior Citizens Support Group Sarah Moverlay-Brown, Nova Wakefield District Limited Safeen Rehman, Healthwatch Wakefield Sarah Roxby, Wakefield and District Housing Peter Skinner, NHS England Glynnis Wilson, Warmfield Cum Heath Community Fundraising Group Nova Annual General Meeting 12 October 2016 Page 2 of 3 The annual general meeting started at 9.35am. 1. Welcome and apologies for absence 2. Chair's opening remarks The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting and read out the apologies. 3. Minutes of the last Annual General Meeting held on 7 October 2015 Justine Bilton proposed and Mohammed Ayub seconded that the minutes of the annual general meeting held on 7 October 2015 should be accepted as a true and correct record. The acceptance was unanimous. 4. Presentation and acceptance of Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Mark Upex from Hansons presented the Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16. Mark summarised the statement of financial activities on page 10, and the balance sheet on page 11. Mark pointed out that there'd been a decrease in contract income (Incoming resources from charitable activities – page 14) due to two contracts ending. However, there had been an increase in grants received over the year. Mark noted that the balance sheet is going from strength to strength and Nova has performed well during the year. Nova keeps three months of reserves. Mark concluded that the accounts represent a true and fair record of the year. Vivian Hughes proposed and Christine Bann seconded that the Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 should be accepted. The acceptance was unanimous. 5. Reappointment of Hansons as Auditors The Chair recommended that Hansons be reappointed as auditors for 2016/17. Liz Halliday proposed and Mohammed Ayub seconded the acceptance of the recommendation, which was carried unanimously. 6. Appointment of Directors Four existing Nova Directors, Penny Carter, Mike Holt, Tony Howell and Sarah Roxby, stood for re-election. Bridget Gill proposed and Mohammed Ayub seconded the re-election of Penny Carter, Mike Holt, Tony Howell and Sarah Roxby, who were re-elected unopposed. Peter Skinner, NHS England, stood for election as a Nova Director. Justine Bilton proposed and Tony Howell seconded the election of Peter Skinner, who was elected unopposed. The meeting finished at 9.50am. Nova Annual General Meeting 12 October 2016 Page 3 of 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Wakefield
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Wakefield Report to The Electoral Commission July 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 342 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 13 2 Current electoral arrangements 15 3 Draft recommendations 19 4 Responses to consultation 21 5 Analysis and final recommendations 23 6 What happens next? 67 Appendices A Final recommendations for Wakefield: Detailed mapping 69 B First draft of electoral change Order for Wakefield 71 C Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral Order 76 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 no. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Sycamore House, Kirkthorpe Lane, Heath, Wakefield, West Yorkshire Wf1 5Sl
    Heritage Statement, Design & Access Statement and Impact Assessment in support of an application for ‘changes to the vehicular access’ at SYCAMORE HOUSE, KIRKTHORPE LANE, HEATH, WAKEFIELD, WEST YORKSHIRE WF1 5SL For NOEL STACKHOUSE OCTOBER 2020 National Grid Reference: SE 35555 19993 Britt Harwood PG Dip (Arch) PG Dip (Bldg Cons) RIBA SCA AABC inc-architecture ltd, the barn, mock hall farm, 63 leeds road, mirfield, west yorkshire wf14 0da m. 07831 275394; w. inc-architecture.com; e. [email protected] Registered in England company no. 6039806 A Royal Institute of British Architects Chartered Practice LIST OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1.1 Purpose of the Heritage Statement 1.2 Methodology 1.3 Background Information 1.3.1 The Character of the Area 1.3.2 The Historic Development of Heath 1.3.3 Heath during the 19th and 20th centuries 1.3.4 Planning History 2.0 HERITAGE STATEMENT & IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2.1 The Listing Description 2.2 Statement of Significance 2.3 Proposal 2.4 Impact Assessment 3.0 LIST OF QUOTATIONS 4.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY Fig 01. (Cover photo) Front elevation of Sycamore House (Grade II) in 2017 from the north- west 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE HERITAGE STATEMENT 1.1.1 Sycamore House lies within a terrace of houses situated on the southern side of Heath Common in the West Yorkshire village of Heath. The property was bought by the current owner Mr Noel Stackhouse in February 2017. Following an initial phase of urgent repairs to the roof (permission for which was granted in April 2018), Planning and Listed Building consent were awarded in November 2018 for the building’s repair and minor alteration and the fabric repairs have now been complete in a sensitive manner using methods and materials contemporary with the buildings original construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2020, North East and Yorkshire
    North East & Yorkshire Register 2020 HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 130 Content and criteria III York (UA) 132 Key statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 26 Tees Valley 32 Darlington (UA) 32 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 45 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 60 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 61 Harrogate 64 North York Moors (NP) 67 Richmondshire 74 Ryedale 77 Scarborough 89 Selby 91 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 95 South Yorkshire 98 Barnsley 98 Doncaster 100 Peak District (NP) 104 Rotherham 105 Sheffield 107 West Yorkshire 111 Bradford 111 Calderdale 115 Kirklees 120 Leeds 124 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 29, 1901. Mo. 27381. G
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 29, 1901. 8457 situated in the parish of West Ardsley (other- fract-road), and terminating therein at the wise Woodkirk), in the urban district of boundary separating the said parish from the Ardsley East and West, commencing in Britan- parish and township of Sharlston, in the rural nia-road at a point opposite the western corner district of Wakefield. of the junction of that road with the road lead- Railway No. 23. ing to Tingley Station by a junction with the 1 mile 5'65 chains in length (route) wholly authorised light railway (Morley and District situated in the parish and township of Sharls- Light Railways Order, 1901), passing thence in ton, in the rural district of Wakefield, com- an easterly direction along Upper-street, and mencing in Wakefield and Weeland-road (other- terminating therein at the boundary separating wise called Pontefract-road), by a junction with the said parish from the parish of East Ardsley, Railway No. 22 at its termination, passing in the urban district of Ardsley East and thence in an easterly and north-easterly direc- West. tion along that road, and terminating therein at Railway No. 17. the boundary separating the said parish from 1 mile 5 furlongs 7'95 chains in length (route) the parish of Streethouse, in the urban district wholly situated in the parish of East Ardsley of Featherstone. in the urban district of Ardsley East and West, Railway No. 24 commencing in Wakefield-road (otherwise called 5 furlongs 5'35 chains in length (route) Brad ford-road) by a junction with Railway wholly situated in the parish of Stre?thouse, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Wakefield
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Wakefield February 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1. Introduction 13 2. Current electoral arrangements 15 3. Submissions received 19 4. Analysis and draft recommendations 21 5. What happens next? 55 Appendix A Draft recommendations for Wakefield: 57 Detailed mapping B Code of practice on written consultation 59 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Robin Gray Joan Jones Ann M Kelly Professor Colin Mellors Archie Gall (Director) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
    [Show full text]
  • South Kirkby to Sharlston Common
    High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | LA14 LA14: South Kirkby to Sharlston Common High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H25 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report LA14: South Kirkby to Sharlston Common H25 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE for ENGLAND PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW of WAKEFIELD Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the City
    THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF WAKEFIELD Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the City of Wakefield July 2003 Sheet 2 of 6 KEY DISTRICT BOUNDARY Sheet 2 PROPOSED DISTRICT WARD BOUNDARY "This map is reproduced from the OS map by The Electoral Commission PARISH BOUNDARY with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. PARISH WARD BOUNDARY 2 3 Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. PARISH WARD COINCIDENT WITH OTHER BOUNDARIES 1 Licence Number: GD03114G" PROPOSED WARD NAME ALTOFTS AND WHITWOOD WARD Only Parishes whose Warding has been 4 5 altered by these Recommendations have been coloured. 6 WHELDALE M i n AIREDALE AND e r a l R FERRY FRYSTON WARD a i l w a y Castleford Ings D A O R D L E I F S N A T S D A O R N O T R E B M E P WHITWOOD MERE D R OAD OD EY R O ETHL DW M AL HE Three Lane Ends Middle School D r CASTLEFORD OA Methley Lanes lde E R a IDG r C BR ve RY Ri FER B E A N Aire C and Calder N R avigation O F T R O HALF ACRES A D C alder Cut STANLEY AND OUTWOOD EAST WARD HIGHTOWN E VENU ILL A REDH B R O O Castleford, Normanton M H I (General) L L & District Hospital ck e B rl hu C ke o h C CASTLEFORD CENTRAL ANDGLASS GLASSHOUGHTON WARD WHITWOOD HOUGHTON Ackton Pastures M W O A Junior and Infant School U L N K T C arr Beck ALTOFTS AND WHITWOOD WARD E N A L S S A L F W a in D ik e ALTOFTS PARISH WARD M B 62 e c k 2 ACKTON PASTURE PARISH WARD M 6 Def NORMANTON CP D e f ef D Altofts R E D R D
    [Show full text]
  • Wakefield Libraries and Information Services, Local Studies
    GB 0740 Cusworth Wakefield Libraries and Information Services, Local Studies This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA9199 The National Archives Deposited in "'akefield Records Office, Library Headquarters, Balne Lane, Wakefield, -with the exception of: 33. Tickhill parish enclosure award 1766 Hatfield Chase drainage c.1860-1920 Tetley, Joshua ^c Son (brewing) 1848-1942 , F. ^Newton, Chambers & Go (iron) c.1890-1942 H. British Moss Litter Company c. 1890-1920 Transport A. Lower Strafforth and Tickhill Highway Board c.1865-1880 Social A. Thome Union minutes c. 1337-1850 B. Askern Local Board minutes 1870-1881 Prickley with Clayton rate hooks 1307-1838 Bawtry manorial documents 17th century-1904 P. Aldam of Prickley estate c.1770-1900 Battie-Wrightson of Cusworth c.1800-1900 G, Doncaster Unions c. 1875-1960 Doncaster Borough and Divisional Labour parties c.1912-1950 Sheffield Equalized Indepenfient Druids, Doncaster branch c.1750-1920 United Order of Pree Gardeners, Doncaster lodges 11 M. Land tax returns, Wapontake of Strafforth and^Tickhill Lower 1798-1926 ( retained at Cusworth Hall. (See Wakefield ItO return of accessions, 1975) RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DONCASTER CUSWORTH HALL MUSEUM A SUMMARY LIST OF THE ARCHIVES IN THE MUSEUM COLLECTION, by John Goodchild. Publication Number 4. 1969 A SUMMARY LIST OF THE ARCHIVES IN THE MUSEUM COLLECTION INDUSTRIES: A. COLLIERY RECORDS: Milnes, Stansfeld & Co. (Flockton Colliery) c. 1780- 1895 Smithson (New Park " ) c. 1790- 1850 Fenton (the ' Coal Kings" ) c.1700- 1860 Charlesworth (West and South Yorks. collieries) c , 1800- 1947 Morton (first Mines Inspector) c.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    SHARLSTON Parish Council photograph reproduced by courtesy of Danny Lees ANNUAL REPORT 2019 SHARLSTON PARISH COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2018/19 INTRODUCTION Once again Sharlston Parish Council has undertaken to provide an annual report, to give residents an update on its business and activities over the previous year. Residents are also welcome to attend Parish Council meetings and can keep track of the Council’s activities through the new website and on Facebook. At the time of this report our final accounts for the financial year 2018/19 are being audited and an outline of these accounts is printed in this report. Parish Councillors give of their time on a wholly voluntary and unpaid basis. They recognise the importance of channels of communication between the Parish Council and residents, allowing both sides to have a clear view of what is needed and how it is best achieved. A list of all the Parish Councillors and their representation on committees and outside bodies is included in the next few pages. We have been pleased to welcome three new Councillors since the last Annual Report: Councillor Paul Belbin, Councillor Susan Pollard and Councillor Stephen Goodhead. Unfortunately, because of work commitments Councillor Debra Bond has had to resign from the Parish Council and we take this opportunity to thank her for the contribution she has made. We at present have one vacancy on the Parish Council so anyone interested in becoming a Councillor should contact the clerk in the first instance. We hope you find this report provides a further insight into our business and activities over the year 2018/19.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Plan 2017
    Normanton & Featherstone AREA PLAN 2017 Ward 6 Ward 10 Featherstone Central Normanton Featherstone North West Newland with Sharlston Woodhouse Moor Featherstone East Woodhouse Featherstone South Warmfield cum Heath Ward 6 Kirkthorpe, Heath Normanton Common Ward 10 Your Area Working For You Normanton & Featherstone include the following areas: Your Local Councillors are: Ward 6 Featherstone Central, Featherstone North West, Graham Maureen Sharlston Isherwood Richard Taylor Tennant- King Featherstone East 01977 602172 01977 796188 07717 303068 and gisherwood@ dicktaylor@ mtennantking@ Featherstone wakefield.gov.uk wakefield.gov.uk wakefield.gov.uk South Your Local Councillors are: Ward 10 Normanton Newland with Woodhouse Moor Woodhouse Elaine Blezard David Dagger Alan Wassell Warmfield cum 07824 320815 07901 990736 07760 182798 Heath eblezard@ ddagger@ alanwassell@ Kirkthorpe wakefield.gov.uk wakefield.gov.uk wakefield.gov.uk Heath Normanton Common Introduction This Local Area Plan for the Normanton and Featherstone area outlines the priorities for the 40,840 people who live here. These priorities were identified following consultation with local residents, businesses, community groups, councillors and other partners including Police, Health, Fire and WDH. As well as these local priorities, over the next year we will be prioritising ‘good growth’ right across the Wakefield district. There are three key elements to good growth: growing good businesses, growing good jobs and growing resilient communities. During 2017 we will focus on these
    [Show full text]
  • LEA Consultation Strategy 15 February 2021
    LEA Consultation Strategy 15 February 2021 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Objectives ................................................................................................................ 2 3. Summary of Engagement Activity Undertaken to Date ............................................. 3 4. Audience .................................................................................................................. 3 4.1. Aviation Stakeholders .................................................................................................. 3 4.2. Non-Aviation Stakeholders ........................................................................................... 4 4.2.1. Local Parish/District/County Councils ....................................................................... 4 4.2.2. Parliamentary Constituencies ................................................................................... 6 4.3. Nearby environmentally sensitive areas ....................................................................... 6 5. Approach ................................................................................................................. 6 5.1. Notification of this consultation ................................................................................... 6 5.2. Access and response to consultation ............................................................................ 7 5.3. Consultation monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
    Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment PROPOSED STANLEY FERRY SAND AND GRAVEL QUARRY STANLEY FERRY, WAKEFIELD Issue 1: March 2020 This page intentionally left blank Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Revision record Rev No. Date Originator Checker/Approver Status Issue 1 9 March 2020 Adela Sadler Chris Ballam For planning Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment PROPOSED STANLEY FERRY SAND AND GRAVEL QUARRY STANLEY FERRY, WAKEFIELD Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 Development outline .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site location ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Mineral type ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Proposed development programme ................................................................................. 4 2.4 Proposed site layout, plant and haulage .......................................................................... 5 2.5 Proposed scheme of working ........................................................................................... 7 2.6 Landscape strategy and restoration scheme ..................................................................
    [Show full text]