German and British Planning in Early March 1941 91 the Die Is Cast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

German and British Planning in Early March 1941 91 the Die Is Cast german and british planning in early march 1941 91 Chapter Four the die is Cast: German and British planninG in early marCh 1941 in early march, while the Greeks combined ongoing operations in albania against the italians with preparing the doiran-nestos line, the ‘newcomers’ to the theatre, both German and British, were on the move. as the German 12th army pushed south from romania into Bulgaria and towards the Greek frontier, British and dominion troops began to arrive at the port of piraeus, athens, in a series of naval convoys from egypt. in the first half of the month such movements were accompanied on both sides by the rapid develop- ment of operational plans. in many ways, because of the much greater need for coordination and cooperation between the Greek and imperial forces, the evolution of allied preparations to counter the looming German inva- sion in this period were even more complex and than those of their adver- saries—and yet at the same time Field marshal list’s army was beset with its own set of problems. the period was a particularly hectic period for both sides. it was also a crucial phase insofar as the decisions made and plans set in train in this period shaped the course and conduct of what followed. With German plans for military action against Greece crystallising up to February 1941, the first practical operational step had was to move the 12th army through Bulgaria up to the Greek border. as noted in Chapter 2, a number of German air bases had already been constructed in semi-secret in Bulgaria by luftwaffe ground staff dressed as civilians. the move of such a large force, however, proved a much more difficult proposition. two ear- lier separate German reconnaissance missions into Bulgaria in november and december 1940 confirmed the difficulty in marching through the coun- try before spring, given the winter weather and the state of the roads. as ordered by oKW, the 12th army then began to cross into Bulgaria on 2 march with instructions to occupy various assembly areas in the southwest part of the country, near the Greek frontier. even without enemy air inter- diction, however, this approach march of up to 640 kilometres was not without considerable problems which included the worst possible roads, terrible weather, poor accommodation, traversing mountain passes still 92 chapter four choked with snow, and the fact that only one reliable rail line was available to support the 12th army’s advance. according to list such conditions ‘highly taxed the strength of both commanding officers and men’.1 German horse-drawn columns, in particular, were badly broken up and only suc- cessful eventually due to Bulgarian oxen placed at the 12th army’s dis- posal along a string of relay stations. this system allowed the steepest gradients to be overcome without the loss of too many horses. in the end such measures, a strong force of military police for traffic control, the Bul- garian labour service, the active cooperation of Bulgarian officials ‘and the very friendly spirit of the Bulgarian population’, helped ensure a successful German transit.2 even once assembled in southern Bulgaria, however, poor local infrastructure meant list had considerable difficulty in adequately accommodating and supplying his formations, particularly with respect to food, fodder, and medical supplies. all of this was in addition to ongoing uncertainty regarding yugoslav intentions, the Greeks backed by the British, and the turkish divisions currently stationed in eastern thrace. on the other hand by 6 march hitler was confident that there was little danger of a turkish intervention and, at least according to list’s Chief of staff Gen- eral h. von Greiffenberg, there was still thought in some German military circles that an invasion may not be necessary. perhaps, even at this late stage the 12th army’s occupation of Bulgaria alone might be sufficient to achieve Germany’s political objectives of convincing the Greeks to seek an armistice in albania and declare their absolute neutrality. By then, how- ever, the Greeks had cast in their lot with the allies. as list’s formations concentrated near the Greek border from 7 march the first British and dominion troops of W Force began to land in athens.3 1 ‘preliminary history of the Balkan campaign’, reviewed and edited by Field marshal s.W. list and General h. von Greiffenberg, 9 June 1947, aWm 54, 624/7/2. 2 major l. Glombik, intelligence officer, 12th army, ‘the German Balkan Campaign’, 23 June 1947, aWm 54, 624/7/2. ‘preliminary history of the Balkan campaign’, reviewed and edited by Field marshal s.W. list and General h. von Greiffenberg, 9 June 1947, aWm 54, 624/7/2; General h. von Greiffenberg, ‘answers to a questionnaire given by the australian historical section’, 4 July 1947, aWm 54, 624/7/2; hepp, ‘die 12. armee im Balkanfeldzug 1941’, pp. 203-4; d. Garnett, The Campaign in Greece and Crete, hmso, london, 1942, p. 11; m. van Creveld, Hitler’s Strategy 1940-1941: The Balkan Clue, Cambridge university press, london, 1973, pp. 99, 97, 102, 109. 3 hitler’s reichstag speech after the campaign on 4 may 1941 again emphasised he would have preferred a political rather than military solution to Greece, but nonetheless a friendly southern flank was a military necessity. oKW/WFst., ‘abt. l (i op.) 44274/.41 gK Chefs.’, 5 march 1941, Bundesarchiv militärarchiv (Ba ma), rW 4/588; ‘preliminary history of the Balkan campaign’, reviewed and edited by Field marshal s.W. list and General h. von Greiffenberg, 9 June 1947, aWm 54, 624/7/2; ‘a few war experiences’, reviewed and edited .
Recommended publications
  • CIVILIAN DEFENSE (January - May 1943)
    (Bibliographies of the World at War No. VIl) Supplement No. 2 a THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE SERVICE CIVILIAN DEFENSE (January - May 1943) Selected and 'Annotated Bibliography on the Organization and Administration of Air Raid Protection Washington, D.C. 1943 PREFACE These "Bibliographies of the World at War" are periodical cumulations of a weekly annotated index of material relating to the war in its various aspects. This material cciaes into the Library of Congress and.into, some of the Departmental and specialized libraries in .Yashington. It represents a selection f rom several thousand periodicals, books and pamphlets. In making the selection, emphasis is placed upon the economic and social aspects of the war effort, since the current index is prepared as a Joint project of the National War Agencies and the Library of Congress, Increasing emphasis is placed on the impact of the war upon political conditions and institutions. Stress has always been laid upon postwar problems. Highly technical engineering, military, and medical articles and bocks are not covered. The cumulations as a whole have been brought together under ten subject divisions, noted below. The basic cumulation covered the first year of the project, from April 1, 1941 to May 31, 1942, The first series of supplements covered the nine months from the first of April 1942., to the end of the yee.r. Supplement No. 2, presented herewith, covers the first five months of 1943. The titles of the separate cumulations indicate roughtly the coverage of each of the bibliographies. I. Political Developments and the War II, Agriculture in a War Economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lend Lease Act, 11 March 1941
    Lend Lease Act, 11 March 1941 AN ACT Further to promote the defense of the United States, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate add House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as "An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States". SEC. 2. As used in this Act - (a) The term "defense article" means - (1) Any weapon, munition. aircraft, vessel, or boat; (2) Any machinery, facility, tool, material, or supply necessary for the manufacture, production, processing, repair, servicing, or operation of any article described in this subsection; (3) Any component material or part of or equipment for any article described in this subsection; (4) Any agricultural, industrial or other commodity or article for defense. Such term "defense article" includes any article described in this subsection: Manufactured or procured pursuant to section 3, or to which the United States or any foreign government has or hereafter acquires title, possession, or control. (b) The term "defense information" means any plan, specification, design, prototype, or information pertaining to any defense article. SEC. 3. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, the President may, from time to time. when he deems it in the interest of national defense, authorize the Secretary Of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or the bead of any other department or agency of the Government - (1) To manufacture in arsenals, factories, and shipyards under their jurisdiction, or otherwise procure, to the extent to which funds are made available therefor, or contracts are authorized from time to time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for the government of any country whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Pearl Harbor Revisited: U.S
    United States Cryptologic History Cryptologic States United United States Cryptologic History Pearl Harbor Revisited: U.S. Navy Communications Intelligence 1924–1941 Pearl Harbor Revisited Harbor Pearl 2013 Series IV: World War II | Volume 6 n57370 Center for Cryptologic History This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other U.S. government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please submit your request to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Frederick D. Parker retired from NSA in 1984 after thirty-two years of service. Following his retirement, he worked as a reemployed annuitant and volunteer in the Center for Cryptologic His- tory. Mr. Parker served in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1943 to 1945 and from 1950 to 1952. He holds a B.S. from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service. Cover: First Army photo of the bombing of Hawaii, 7 December 1941; the battleship USS Arizona in background is on fire and sinking. Signal Corps photo taken from Aeia Heights. Pearl Harbor Revisited: U.S. Navy Communications Intelligence 1924–1941 Frederick D. Parker Series IV: World War II | Volume 6 Third edition 2013 Contents Foreword ...................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 the VITAL FUNCTION: World War II and Diplomatic Security
    CHAPTER 2 THE VITAL FUNCTION: World War II and Diplomatic Security CHAPTER 2 8 THE VITAL FUNCTION World War II and Diplomatic Security The experiences of the World War II era (1933-1945) expanded and solidified diplomatic security as a vital function of the Department of State. From the first days of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s presidency, the Department faced grave threats to U.S. diplomacy, primarily from Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and Japan. As a result, the Department broadened its definition of security and expanded the number of entities monitoring and enforcing security. The Department’s new, expanded security apparatus under President Roosevelt, however, was disjointed. Security responsibilities were dispersed across multiple offices with overlapping jurisdictions. Moreover, the Office of the Chief Special Agent, which had handled security since World War I, often was not involved in many of the new security measures. By the end of World War II, the Department was implementing security in a more extensive, formalized manner that touched and altered every level of the Department’s operations. In fact, many security measures first implemented during World War II—such as coded ID badges, formal document classification procedures, and a courier network—are today accepted as part of the Department’s normal, daily routine. Moscow and Berlin When Franklin D. Roosevelt assumed the Presidency in March 1933, the Department of State faced diplomatic security threats from Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Throughout the 1930s, the regimes of both nations respectively targeted the U.S. Embassies in Berlin and Moscow for espionage. Security problems at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Notable Dates Connected with Newcastle During WW2
    Notable dates connected with Newcastle during WW2 Local Studies Factsheet No. 4 1 September 1939 The first batch of 31,222 children from Newcastle schools was evacuated. 2 September 1939 A further batch of 12,818 mothers and children under school age was evacuated. 3 September 1939 War declared. 19 September 1939 North Mail amalgamated with Newcastle Journal because of war conditions. 26 September 1939 Lord Mayor’s War Needs Fund inaugurated. 17 October 1939 Air-raid warning on Tyneside for 1hr.30 min. No enemy action. 20 November 1939 Canteen for Service men and women opened on Platform 8 at Central Station. 26 November 1939 Lecture by John Gielgud entitled “Shakespeare in Peace and War” at Theatre Royal, in aid of Lord Mayor’s Red Cross Fund. 1 December 1939 Inspection of Civil Defence and A.R.P. arrangements. 18 December 1939 Newcastle War Savings Campaign inaugurated. 27 March 1940 Lord Mayor received a letter from the Polish Ambassador in London thanking the City for its kindness to Poles stranded here due to the War. 22 May 1940 Decision taken to cancel Race Week Fair. 11 June 1940 Decision taken to cancel Race Week holidays. 21 June 1940 Newcastle Voluntary Training Corps formed. 2 July 1940 Major air-raid in the late afternoon. In Newcastle and Jarrow 13 people killed, 123 injured. Spillers factory was hit in an attempt to destroy the High Level Bridge. 7 July 1940 Second evacuation scheme inaugurated. 4,300 school children left by train. 18 July 1940 High explosive bombs dropped 3 killed, many injured and considerable damage inflicted including a hit on Heaton Secondary School.
    [Show full text]
  • British Aid to Greece, 1940-1941
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Military History History 1986 Diary of a Disaster: British Aid to Greece, 1940-1941 Robin Higham Kansas State University Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Higham, Robin, "Diary of a Disaster: British Aid to Greece, 1940-1941" (1986). Military History. 9. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_military_history/9 Diary of a Disaster o Moscow ° Berlino ATLANTIC OCEAN °Ankara Malta ~Athe~ns ALGERIA MEDITERRANEAN SEAc/ Benghazi . Cairo i I I I I I I SUDAN I I Khartoum )J ...\~ .Jl~N£Q!!E~ENT ROUTE ,/ ~- ""'------- ~--_/ ~ / / / / EAST AFRICA I I 1000 MILE RADIUS FROM LONDON AND CAIRO Diary of a Disaster British Aid to Greece 1940-1941 ROBIN HIGHAM THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY For Barbara for thirty-six years of love and friendship Copyright © 1986 by Robin Higham Published by the University Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2009 The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuring a Student Debate: Should the United States Enter World War II? (Prior to the Bombing of Pearl Harbor) A
    Debating Problems in History Should the United States have entered World War II before the bombing of Pearl Harbor? This lesson developed for the Potomac Association by Phyllis Goldsmith Stephen Johnson Steven Moreno Sarah Suponski UCBHSSP Co-Director Retired OUSD Oakland High School UCBHSSP & Literacy Specialist Teacher Table of Contents Lesson Directions for Teachers……………….................. 3 Historical Context ………………………………………. 4 Historical Context KEY ………………………………… 5 Timeline ………………………………………………… 6 Timeline KEY …………………………………………... 7 Primary Sources ………………………………………… 8 Document Analysis Chart 1 ……………………………. 13 Primary Source Evidence Chart KEY…………………… 14 Writing Prompt …………………………………………. 17 Possible Thesis Statements ……………………………… 18 Works Cited ……………………………………………... 19 Bibliography for Further Reading ………………………. 20 Appendices – Literacy Support Strategies ……………… 22 Structuring a Debate Document Analysis Chart 2 Five Paragraph Essay Outline 2 DEBATING PROBLEMS IN HISTORY: Should the United States have entered World War II before the bombing of Pearl Harbor? This lesson developed for the Potomac Association by Phyllis Goldsmith, Stephen Johnson, Steven Moreno, and Sarah Suponski California State History-Social Science Content Standards: 11.7 Students analyze America's participation in World War II. 11.7.1 Examine the origins of American involvement in the war, with an emphasis on the events that precipitated the attack on Pearl Harbor. Directions for Teachers 1) Preparing students for the lesson a. Read the lesson focus question to set purpose of this lesson. b. Students brainstorm historical events of the 1930s to review historical context. c. Read in textbook about the build up to the bombing of Pearl Harbor and fill in the timeline with major events. d. Read the Historical Context Document to identify arguments of isolationists and interventionists and fill in the chart.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Words of War: Their Speeches and Correspondence, November 1940-March 1941
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2009 Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Words of War: Their Speeches and Correspondence, November 1940-March 1941. Leslie A. Mattingly Bean East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Bean, Leslie A. Mattingly, "Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Words of War: Their peS eches and Correspondence, November 1940-March 1941." (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1858. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1858 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Words of War: Their Speeches and Correspondence, November 1940-March 1941 _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in American History _____________________ by Leslie A. Mattingly Bean August 2009 _____________________ Dr. Emmett M. Essin, III, Chair Dr. Stephen G. Fritz Dr. Colin F. Baxter Keywords: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston S. Churchill, War Rhetoric, Speeches, Lend-Lease ABSTRACT Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Words of War: Their Speeches and Correspondence, November 1940-March 1941 by Leslie A. Mattingly Bean Prime Minister Winston Churchill and President Franklin Roosevelt inspired the Allies with memorable speeches in their fight against the Axis Powers during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II: Homefront How Did the World War II Impact Americans at Home?
    TEACHING WITH PRIMARY SOURCES World War II: Homefront How did the World War II impact Americans at home? Unlike more recent conflicts where the U.S. relied on a volunteer army, World War II engaged the efforts of the entire civilian population. All males between the ages of 18 to 35 had to register for the draft. Rationing of food, gasoline, tires and clothing required life style changes. With American soldiers fighting on two fronts around the globe, families and friends anxiously awaited for reports of the war’s progress and casualties. War Effort in Iowa American agriculture supported not only our own troops but the military and civilian populations of our Allies. Food rationing and victory gardens at home made more resources available for Great Britain, Russia and other military partners. Farmers managed to produce more livestock, grains, cotton and other supplies in the face of worker shortages due to the military call-up of farm labor. New farm equipment was in short supply as factories shifted to tanks, jeeps and armaments, but farmers learned to repair and share existing machinery. Women also stepped into farm production and management roles in place of husbands, fathers and sons. In Iowa, the Extension Service at Iowa State provided valuable information to farm families and relayed information from Washington on wartime regulations and best farming practices. Moving into full wartime production required a quick expansion of the labor market in the face of the loss of males heading into service. To fill the gap, the American government and factories made a push to encourage women to take jobs they had never held before.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment of Women in War Production*
    Employment of Women in War Production* DURING THE WAR PERIOD OF 1914-18, more women about 500,000 women left domestic service for entered the labor force than ever before. They other employment during the same period. In worked not only as clerks and saleswomen but some jobs women replaced men directly; else• also as lathe operators, punch-press operators, where, jobs were broken down into component single and multiple-spindle-drill-press operators, parts, which women then could perform. To grinders, riveting-machine operators, inspectors, meet the growing demand for agricultural labor, crane operators, assemblers, and case makers. voluntary organizations such as the Women's In some war industries, such as aircraft, the em• Land Service Corps (Government aided) recruited ployment of women rose from negligible propor• and placed women on farms. Between 1914 and tions before the war to about 19 percent in 1918. 1917, 44,500 additional women supplemented the In other war industries the proportions were agricultural labor force. Careful selection was considerably higher: 37 percent in optical goods, made of the women placed, and preference was 35 percent in rubber goods and in photographic given those with agricultural training. Care was supplies, 33 percent in leather goods, and 27 taken to ensure the safety and comfort of women percent in electrical goods.1 At the close of the farm workers, and the women proved of con• First World War, women constituted some 20 siderable aid in meeting the labor requirements of percent of the working force in all manufacturing an expanded agricultural program. industries in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Blitzkrieg Against the USSR, 1941
    BELFER CENTER PAPER The German Blitzkrieg Against the USSR, 1941 Andrei A. Kokoshin PAPER JUNE 2016 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org Design & Layout by Andrew Facini Cover image: A German map showing the operation of the German “Einsatzgruppen” of the SS in the Soviet Union in 1941. (“Memnon335bc” / CC BY-SA 3.0) Statements and views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Copyright 2016, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BELFER CENTER PAPER The German Blitzkrieg Against the USSR, 1941 Andrei A. Kokoshin PAPER JUNE 2016 About the Author Andrei Kokoshin is a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and dean of Moscow State University’s Faculty of World Politics. He has served as Russia’s first deputy defense minister, secretary of the Defense Council and secretary of the Security Council. Dr. Kokoshin has also served as chairman of the State Duma’s Committee on the CIS and as first deputy chairman of the Duma’s Committee on Science and High Technology. Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................vi Introduction .............................................................................. 1 Ideology, Political Goals and Military Strategy of Blitzkrieg in 1941 ..................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • December 1941: “The Most Tremendous Undertaking”
    December 1941: “The Most Tremendous Undertaking” when she first heard that pearl harbor had been attacked, sixteen- year-old Elaine R. Engelson of Brooklyn was “amazed and ashamed” of her “weakness in facing a world crisis.” She wrote to the New York Times the next day that although she, like many others, had “felt the inevitability of war” for some time, “the thought of it actually having come upon us was sudden.” The horrifying events in Hawaii suddenly changed the rhythms of the teenager’s life. She had grown accustomed to countless airplanes fl ying overhead, but on December 8, the sound of an approaching plane produced a new sense of dread. Although “the world has not yet come to an end by any means,” she had the ominous feeling that “we are on the brink of a precipice overhanging a world of complete darkness.” What was at stake, she said, was something she and many Americans had not fully appreciated until then: “We are fi ghting to save the world from a fate worse than death.”1 For a stunned nation, it seemed impossible that the U.S. Pacifi c Fleet had been caught so unaware. Over twenty-four hundred Americans had died, and the navy had lost eight battleships, four destroyers, and 350 air- planes. Along with shock and anger came another reaction, shared by mil- lions on both coasts. People wondered if Pearl Harbor was just a prelude to something far worse. In a Gallup poll taken shortly after December 7, 60 percent responded that it was “very likely” or “fairly likely” that the West Coast would be attacked in the next few weeks.
    [Show full text]