DOCSLIB.ORG

TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple CHAPTER 4: INVENTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF RAIL TRANSIT VEHICLES CURRENTLY AVAILABLE FOR POTENTIAL JOINT OPERATION WITH RAILROADS 4.1 OVERVIEW ! Electrical Systems ! Brakes, Wheels, Trucks, and The broad range of rail transit vehicles that Couplers (LRVs have might be considered for joint use needs to electronic/redundant braking) be identified, along with the characteristics ! Systems (Operations and that differentiate them. The range of Maintenance) vehicles is based upon a variety of LRT and DMU types of equipment, including Resulting standards will be included in an railroad derivative FRA-compliant and FRA rulemaking procedure wholly or in LRV derivative DMUs, but not including part, eventually producing a new set of conventional commuter railroad equipment requirements for railcar construction, (see Figure 4-1 and Table 4-2). maintenance, inspections, and testing. As of January 1, 1997, all states having rail Furthermore, DMU development has transit not regulated by FRA must have recently been focused on more than that of had state safety oversight in place. This LRVs, because the DMU has a much wider includes the AGT people movers, as in range of designs and characteristics. The Detroit, and vintage trolley operations, as newer (less familiar to U.S. markets) LRT in Memphis. derivative DMU option is generally less costly and more likely to be attractive as a Many different types of DMU and LRT rail "new start." The lighter DMUs are vehicles are available outside North sometimes referred to as DLRV (diesel America. Their key characteristics, and light rail vehicles) and can serve as a their compatibility to operate jointly on precursor to LRT. In addition, railroads and on LRT tracks are best contemporary LRVs of varying types are described by category. One suggestion is to far from being FRA-compliant, whereas divide DMUs into subgroups: High Floor DMUs range from designs similar to LRVs DMU, Low Floor DMU and Electric LRT. to much heavier and generally FRA- The TRB Subcommittee on DMUs compliant types. DMU and LRT included (A1E07-1) recommends another system in the range of vehicles are representative based on three categories: FRA Compliant- of the much larger number of choices that RR Derivative, Non FRA Compliant-RR are either currently or soon to be available. Derivative (largely overseas designs), and Non FRA Compliant-LRT Derivative. The evolving APTA Passenger Rail A similar three-category system is Equipment Safety Standards (PRESS) recommended and used subsequently in program may influence the potential use of this report to classify DMU, including: LRT or DMU under joint use operations. The PRESS program is a task force of • Category 1 - FRA-compliant, industry experts funded by commuter rail railroad derivative (e.g. "Budd Car agencies, assembled under the auspices of type") for railroad application APTA and recognized by FRA. Its mission • Category 2 - Non FRA-compliant, is to develop a new set of rail car safety LRV or overseas railroad derivative, standards covering the following: non streetcar track-compatible for railroad, some interurban and rapid ! Collision and Structural transit application Requirements Chapter 4 — Page 1 Dimensional Contrasts - Locomotive, LRV, DMU - Figure 4-1 Chapter 4 — Page 2 Table 4-1 Range of DMU and LRT Vehicles Available for Potential Joint Operation with Freight Railroads DMU Category 1= Railroad Derivative DMU 2= LRV Derivative DMU 3= Dual-Power LRV DMU (or DLRV), 4 = Electric LRV Type A= High-Floor Diesel Vehicle B= Low Floor Diesel Vehicle C= Electric LRT Vehicle (all Category 4, Type C are high floor) Notes: * In Development. *** Averages are based on similar equipment. High - Fully meets most requirements Moderate - Marginally meets most requirements except FRA Low - Non-FRA compliant List of vehicles represents the list information available at the time this report was written Chapter 4 — Page 3 • Category 3 - Non FRA-compliant precedents with early self-propelled rail LRV derivative, dual power (diesel- cars and joint operations do exist. The Rail electric/all-electric), fully LRT- Diesel Car (RDC) and its predecessor compatible [also called Diesel Light "doodlebug" and articulated "shuttlejack" Rail Vehicle or DLRV] for railroad self-propelled cars were embraced by the and light rail track applications U.S. railroad industry because they reduced impacts of regulations and then-prevailing Other subdivisions, based on degrees of labor practices. They permitted "changing FRA compliance are also possible, but the ends" without throwing track switches or research team recommends the above requiring multiple locomotive moves. system because it describes DMUs on both Prime movers could be quickly replaced ends of the operating compatibility and crew requirements were reduced. spectrum, from railroad tracks to in-street RDC's were used in a variety of functions light rail. and operating environments throughout The variety of DMU and light rail vehicles, North America and elsewhere. DMUs have their physical and performance remained in service continuously and characteristics, and their respective degree evolved into rail bus and LRV forms of compliance to U.S. railroad regulations, elsewhere in the world. In the U.S., the industry standards, and practices have been successor to the RDC would be today's outlined. These compliance issues and newly-designed DMU of the three particular Federal requirements may categories suggested above. It has require modifications to current vehicle promising potential for new rail starts for designs to enable joint operation with many of the same reasons that made its freight railroads. Some designs cannot be predecessors attractive. Conversely, their readily adapted to railroad joint use. To rationale faded with commuter rail attempt to do so would destroy the authorities replacing RDCs at the end of integrity of their lightweight design. their useful life with innovative push-pull, Purchasing, operating, and maintaining a bi-level, locomotive-hauled equipment. fleet of DMU vehicles are also monetary For purposes of regulation, FRA considers factors to take into consideration. The all DMUs as locomotives. It does not financial and administrative arrangements differentiate between locomotive-hauled to support this equipment and service is consists and independent self-propelled location-specific. cars coupled into consists. 4.1.1 Historic Perspective and Evolution of Contemporary DMU Most earlier DMU cars were FRA- compliant vehicles in accordance with Joint use of tracks by different types of standards of their era. While technology operators and the availability and use of has progressed and operational/service self-propelled rail diesel cars are not novel requirements may differ, the mixed mode ideas, but these types of operations have of operation with different vehicles is not a not been common in the U.S. for quite new concept. Many of the issues are some time. The attractiveness and similar, but the flexibility to respond and complexities of joint use in today's constraints arising from current standards regulatory, economic, urban land use, are new. Modern signal and control legal, and technical environment have systems can diminish some of these generated supportive discussion and some concerns and provide a superior level of controversy among system planners, co-mingled service. operating agencies, rail system experts, community leaders, and elected officials. DMU generically has a range of potential The issue is controversial. Some deployment scenarios, including: Chapter 4 — Page 4 ! DMU as a free-standing rail transit single-car self-propelled mode where system, not connected to any other the consists split. system and not subject to FRA regulation, operating as a new DLRT ! Low-density intercity railroad line. corridor or branch line shuttles. ! DMU as an integrated part of a new 4.1.2 Vehicle Operational Control commuter rail system or as part of an LRT system, as in the Alternate Rail Two primary modes of vehicle operation Technology (ART) system proposed are available, the most likely being active in California. manual operation by a qualified engineer. This manual mode is common to domestic ! DMU as an initial operating segment railroad operations. However, on some (IOS) for LRT. IOS for LRT is routes, usually where passenger service usually proposed as a central or some occurs, existing automatic train protection other portion of a buildout plan. A has been installed to possibly override the DMU IOS scenario would build engineer. This mode has greater potential either the entire line or most of it, but for error, but is less expensive and has been initially at a lower capital cost and used successfully and safely for decades. level of service. The second option is the passive presence ! DMU as a non-electrified branch of of an engineer while train movement is an LRT system. This could be controlled by automatic train control/ operated as a shuttle, requiring automatic train supervision/automatic train transfer at the junction point or operation. The engineer might make integrated with DMU overlapping announcements and open doors, and is service on the LRT trunk line (DMU available in case of emergency. This Category 2 or 3). With Category 3 complex mode requires significantly more (dual power) DMU, the operation costly and sophisticated technology, but could be fully integrated with DMU affords higher levels of safety and operating in the diesel mode on the redundancy under most conditions. branch and in the electric
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investor Presentation 2019
    Eversholt Rail Investor Presentation 2nd December 2019 Contents • Strategic context • Refranchising, opportunities and challenges • New and existing fleet management • Financial overview • Conclusions • Q&A 1 Executive summary • 2015-2018 characterised by investment to grow balance sheet • General election result and Williams Review should set the industry’s direction of travel over the medium term • Business focused on long-term value while addressing strategic challenges and opportunities • Contracted new build programmes coming to a very successful conclusion: C802 fleet fully delivered, C397 in advanced state of delivery and C195/C331 fleets progressing well • Management effort shifting to maximising opportunities for fleets with leases expiring in the near future and exploring attractiveness of alternative growth opportunities 2 Strategic context Strategy Great Trains, Great People, Great Future To be recognised as the expert provider of transport asset financing and Vision asset management for the long term Two strands to our strategy: 1 Optimise our current portfolio through maximising asset utilisation and investing to enhance residual value (RV) 2 Developing opportunities for further growth in transport sector Maintain investment discipline: we will continue to be selective in choosing growth opportunities ensuring that they are the right assets for our portfolio Great Trains Great Great People Great Great FutureGreat C802 all units in service Company offsite C397 in service 2019 4 2019 – pressures across the rail industry Reshaping
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucester Railway Carriage & Wagon Co. 1St
    Gloucester Railway Carriage & Wagon Co. 1st Generation DMU’s for British Railways A Review Rodger P. Bradley Gloucester RC&W Co.’s Diesel Multiple Units Rodger P Bradley As we know the history of the design and operation of diesel – or is it oil-engine powered? – multiple unit trains can be traced back well beyond nationalisation in 1948, although their use was not widespread in Britain until the mid 1950s. Today, we can see their most recent developments in the fixed formation sets operated over long distance routes on today’s networks, such as those of the Virgin Voyager design. It can be argued that the real ancestry can be seen in such as the experimental Michelin railcar and the Beardmore 3-car unit for the LMS in the 1930s, and the various streamlined GWR railcars of the same period. Whilst the idea of a self-propelled passenger vehicle, in the shape of numerous steam rail motors, was adopted by a number of the pre- grouping companies from around the turn of the 19th/20th century. (The earliest steam motor coach can be traced to 1847 – at the height of the so-called to modernise the rail network and its stock. ‘Railway Mania’.). However, perhaps in some ways surprisingly, the opportunity was not taken to introduce any new First of the “modern” multiple unit designs were techniques in design or construction methods, and built at Derby Works and introduced in 1954, as the majority of the early types were built on a the ‘lightweight’ series, and until 1956, only BR and traditional 57ft 0ins underframe.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple
    APPENDIX A Key FRA Regulations (Affecting Joint Use) The following is a listing of key FRA specifications. This listing is intended as a regulations taken from the Code of Federal general identification of the operative code Regulations (49 CFR 200-299), Federal sections, along with a general description Railroad Administration, that may affect of the requirements. This identification joint operation of light rail transit or diesel code section should not imply or impute multiple unit vehicles with railroads. The that the code provision will need to be selected regulations concern operational modified to operate light rail transit or procedures, standards, and certain design DMU with railroads. Regulation Number and Section Comment §209: Railroad Safety Enforcement Policy procedures for assessing Procedures penalties and for appealing penalties. Also includes, fitness-for-duty and follow-up on FRA recommendations. §210: Railroad Noise Emission Covers total sound emitted by moving Compliance Regulations rail cars and locomotives. Does not apply to: • Steam engines; • Street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, unless operated as a part of the general railroad system of transportation; • Sound emitted by warning devices such as horns, whistles, or bells when operated for the purpose of safety; • Special-purpose equipment that may be located on or operated from rail cars. §211: Rules of Practice Subpart C - Rules of practice that apply to Waivers rulemaking and waiver proceedings, review of emergency orders issued §211.41: Processing of petitions for under 45 U.S.C. 432, and miscellaneous waiver of safety rules safety-related proceedings and informal safety inquiries. Page A-1 Regulation Number and Section Comment §212: State Safety Participation Establishes standards and procedures for Regulations State participation in investigative and surveillance activities under Federal railroad safety laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Industry Decarbonisation Taskforce
    RAIL INDUSTRY DECARBONISATION TASKFORCE FINAL REPORT TO THE MINISTER FOR RAIL JULY 2019 | WITH THE SUPPORT OF RSSB DECARBONISATION TASKFORCE | FINAL REPORT | 01 Foreword I am pleased to present, on behalf of the Rail Industry Decarbonisation Taskforce and RSSB, the final report responding to the UK Minister for Rail’s challenge to the industry to remove “all diesel only trains off the track by 2040” and “produce a vision for how the rail industry will decarbonise.” The initial report, published in January 2019, set out credible technical options to achieve this goal and was widely welcomed by stakeholders. RIA has published its report on the Electrification Cost Challenge. This final report confirms that the rail industry can lead the way in Europe on the drive to decarbonise. It sets out the key building blocks required to achieve the vision that the rail industry can be a major contributor to the UK government’s1 target of net zero carbon2, 3 by 2050, provided that we start now. The GB rail system continues to be one of the lowest carbon modes of transport. It has made material progress in the short time since the publication of the initial report. • The industry has continued to develop technologies toward lower carbon. • RSSB has completed its technical report into decarbonisation, T1145. • The investigation into alternatives for freight, T1160, is well underway. • The Network Rail System Operator is conducting a strategic review to develop the lowest cost pathway for rail to decarbonise to contribute to the national net zero carbon target. The Taskforce is very cognisant of the government review of the rail industry ongoing under the independent chairmanship of Keith Williams and we have provided evidence accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Analysis for a Concept Design of a Hydrogen Hybrid Railway Vehicle Din, Tajud; Hillmansen, Stuart
    University of Birmingham Energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions analysis for a concept design of a hydrogen hybrid railway vehicle Din, Tajud; Hillmansen, Stuart DOI: 10.1049/iet-est.2017.0049 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Din, T & Hillmansen, S 2017, 'Energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions analysis for a concept design of a hydrogen hybrid railway vehicle', IET Electrical Systems in Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet- est.2017.0049 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Published in IET Electrical Systems in Transportation. Final version of record available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-est.2017.0049. Checked for repository 31/1/18 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Fact Sheet February 2016
    Oasis Rail Transit Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Fact Sheet February 2016 Approximately 17 miles in length, the proposed Oasis Rail Transit corridor extends between downtown Cincinnati and the City of Milford and would initially be served by seven stations. In addition to providing a new rail-based regional transportation option serving Eastern Corridor communities, the Oasis line would also offer new opportunities for community enhancement and development. PREFERRED RAIL VEHICLE TYPE: DMU One of the most prominent features considered for the Oasis line is the actual rail vehicle (or train) that would transport passengers to their destinations. Early studies completed for the Eastern Corridor Program recommended that self-propelled passenger coaches be considered as the preferred rail vehicle type. Further studies explored in more detail the technologies available for the line including: • Diesel-powered locomotives pulling single or bi-level passenger coaches • Electrically-powered streetcar-type vehicles • Electrically-powered light rail vehicles call Electric Multiple Units (EMU/LRT) • Diesel-powered passenger cars (Diesel Multiple Units or DMUs) The results of those studies confirmed that diesel-powered passenger cars, or DMUs, would be the most appropriate technology for the Oasis Rail Transit line. Features of DMUs that made it stand out beyond other rail vehicle choices included: • DMUs are flexible in terms of operational capabilities and can efficiently serve the 17-mile Oasis corridor – which is too short for traditional “push-pull” locomotives and coach cars but More information about rail generally too long for streetcar-type vehicles – and efficiently vehicles is available in the Oasis manage the spacing between stations.
    [Show full text]
  • NS Annual Report 2018
    See www.nsannualreport.nl for the online version NS Annual Report 2018 Table of contents 2 In brief 4 2018 in a nutshell 8 Foreword by the CEO 12 The profile of NS 16 Our strategy Activities in the Netherlands 23 Results for 2018 27 The train journey experience 35 Operational performance 47 World-class stations Operations abroad 54 Abellio 56 Strategy 58 Abellio United Kingdom (UK) 68 Abellio Germany 74 Looking ahead NS Group 81 Report by the Supervisory Board 94 Corporate governance 100 Organisation of risk management 114 Finances in brief 126 Our impact on the environment and on society 134 NS as an employer in the Netherlands 139 Organisational improvements 145 Dialogue with our stakeholders 164 Scope and reporting criteria Financial statements 168 Financial statements 238 Company financial statements Other information 245 Combined independent auditor’s report on the financial statements and sustainability information 256 NS ten-year summary This annual report is published both Dutch and English. In the event of any discrepancies between the Dutch and English version, the Dutch version will prevail. 1 NS annual report 2018 In brief More satisfied 4.2 million trips by NS app gets seat passengers in the OV-fiets searcher Netherlands (2017: 3.1 million) On some routes, 86% gave travelling by passengers can see which train a score of 7 out of carriages have free seats 10 or higher Customer 95.1% chance of Clean trains: 68% of satisfaction with HSL getting a seat passengers gave a South score of 7 out of 10 (2017: 95.0%) or higher 83% of
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Freight Mobility Study, Phase II Report
    Corpus Christi – Yoakum Regional Freight Mobility Study, Phase II Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ES-1 SECTION 7 - ANALYSIS OF RAIL/ROADWAY INTERFACE ISSUES .....................................7-1 7.1 METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................7-1 7.1.1 Crossing Selection Criteria.............................................................................7-1 7.1.2 Rail Occupancy ..............................................................................................7-4 7.1.3 Analysis of Results .........................................................................................7-8 7.2 GRADE CROSSING COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS...................................................7-10 7.2.1 Construction Cost Estimates ........................................................................7-10 7.2.2 Benefit-Cost Analysis ...................................................................................7-26 7.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................7-31 SECTION 8 - BOTTLENECK IMPROVEMENTS EVALUATION AND MODELING ..................8-1 8.1 PROJECTED TRAFFIC GROWTH ............................................................................8-1 8.1.1 2035 Train Forecasts......................................................................................8-1 8.1.2 Results............................................................................................................8-2
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Potential of Diesel Multiple-Unit Technology
    00_TRN_286_TRN_286 7/11/13 5:04 PM Page 11 Realizing the Potential of Diesel Multiple-Unit Technology Research Overcomes Barriers THOMAS C. CORNILLIE P esigners of railroad vehicles long have recognized HOTO : T D the efficiencies achievable by locating propulsion HOMAS within a passenger-carrying vehicle, eliminating the need C. C for a separate locomotive. Although various designs of ORNILLIE vehicles powered by steam- and gasoline-fueled engines came into service starting in the 1890s, “diesel multiple unit” (DMU) emerged as a term-of-art in the late 1930s to describe vehicles that could operate as single cars or be combined to form a longer train. For the past 60 years, the rail diesel car (RDC) has epit- omized DMU technology in North America. The Budd Company of Philadelphia built nearly 400 RDCs between 1949 and 1962. These cars quickly gained a reputation for The Denton County Transportation Authority operates DMU vehicles between Denton, Texas, and a connection with the reliability, for adaptability to a range of services, and for Dallas Area Rapid Transit System at Carrolton. Couplings that the ease of making incremental technological upgrades. consolidate power and control connections into a single As federal policy structures for supporting transit couple—a standard feature on current DMU designs— investments solidified in the 1970s, DMU technology facilitate adapting train configuration to ridership demand. offered a way to improve the efficiency of commuter rail service. Revenue service demonstrations of European the intent of FRA crashworthiness regulations, coupled DMUs were carried out with federal funding; however, with regulatory reforms, has opened the door in Ameri- these efforts did not lead to the deployment of new tech- can and Canadian cities to DMUs incorporating proven nology.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Track Ahead with Murrplastik
    Clear track ahead with Murrplastik S ystem Solutions for Railway Engineering Testing to EN 45545-2:2013 with fire shutoff Cable entry and cable holding systems Testing to EN 45545-2:2013 with fire shutoff CABLE HOLDING SYSTEMS A PPLICATIONS Cables and conduits can be fixed simply and quickly For interior and exterior applications throughout rail in every different area of a vehicle using cable hold- transport systems. ing systems. The mountings can either be screwed in place or fixed using blind rivets. CHARA CTERISTICS A PPROVALS CABLE ENTRY SYSTEMS • Halogen-free • UL 94 V0 • Flame resistant • DIN 5510-2 The cable entry system enables cables and conduits • Self-extinguishing • NFF to be inserted, with and without plugs. The cable is • CSA inserted with the help of split cable sleeves. These cable sleeves are pushed into a plastic frame. The cable sleeves are available for a wide range of cable diameters. REFERENCES CABLE ENTRY PLATE • ICX The cable entry plate can accommodate a great • Desiro number of cables and conduits instead of using cable • Desiro RUS Sotschi screw fittings. And in the most compact space! • AM 08, Belgium • Bombardier Talent 2 Very little space is needed owing to its extremely compact design. • Bombardier Lok Traxx • Velaro Russia, ICE China These versions are available in aluminium, stainless • City railway system Bursa Section B steel and plastic. • Bombardier SBB • Regional railways Fire shutoff through an additionally integrated foaming mat. • Thameslink Conduit and fitting systems Testing to EN 45545-2:2013 with fire shutoff CHARA CTERISTICS A PPROVALS • Extensive range of products • UL 94 V0 • NFF • IP69 K • DIN 5510-2 • CSA • Metal thread • Easy assembly • Fittings are delivered ready to install REFERENCES • Halogen-free • Flame resistant • ÖBB Rail Jet • Self-extinguishing • ÖBB City Jet • Bombardier bogie As a fire shutoff, a foaming material is integrated in the screw connection.
    [Show full text]
  • North Wales Coastal Extension
    Train Simulator – North Wales Coastal Extension North Wales Coastal Extension: Crewe - Holyhead © Copyright Dovetail Games 2019, all rights reserved Release Version 1.0 Page 1 Train Simulator – North Wales Coastal Extension Contents 1 Route Map ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2 Rolling Stock ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3 Driving the Class 175 'Coradia' ............................................................................................................ 8 Cab Controls ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Key Layout .......................................................................................................................................... 9 4 Class 175 'Coradia' Systems ............................................................................................................. 10 DSD ................................................................................................................................................... 10 DRA ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Manual Door Control ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PORTFOLIO: CITY MANAGER's OFFICE PURCHASE ORDERS ≥ $10,000 AWARDED UNDER DELEGATION of AUTHORITY Document 1 for the PERIOD JULY 1, 2014 to SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
    PORTFOLIO: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE PURCHASE ORDERS ≥ $10,000 AWARDED UNDER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Document 1 FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2014 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 Professional / Follow-on / Item # PO Port Dept Branch Description Consulting Amount Vendor Non-Competitive Rationale Amendment Services 1 45078173 CMO CCS CPOS Standing offer to supply and deliver Records Management Materials on an as and when E $ 76,320.00 TAB PRODUCTS OF CANADA requested basis. WILLOWDALE ON 2 45070493 CMO CCS CPOS Courier services for standard light delivery materials for the City of Ottawa. A $ 28,757.38 ALL CANADIAN COURIER OTTAWA ON 3 45074332 CMO CCS CPOS Data entry services for the Courthouse and Provincial Offence Services branch to capture PO E $ 42,739.20 CRITICALCONTROL SOLUTIONS INC Section 22(1)(c) ticket information. MARKHAM ON Only one source of supply acceptable and cost effective 4 45078474 CMO CCS CPOS Print and deliver City of Ottawa Maintenance Activity Sheets, per Category A General $ 11,163.93 RR DONNELLEY Printing and Supporting Services. OTTAWA ON 5 45077752 CMO CCS CPOS Provide print production and document management services to support the 2014 $ 15,264.00 GILMORE DOCULINK Municipal Elections. KANATA ON 6 45078558 CMO CCS CPOS Supply, delivery and warehouse City of Ottawa payroll pressure seal direct deposit forms E $ 17,872.11 RR DONNELLEY Section 22(1)(e) on an as and when requested basis OTTAWA ON Security or Confidentiality Matters 7 45078230 CMO CCS EA Rental for one (1) month of fifty (50) iPhones for use by Elections staff for the 2014 $ 12,572.33 IT XCHANGE Municipal Election.
    [Show full text]