A Review of the Fission Decay of the Giant Resonances in the Actinide Region M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review of the Fission Decay of the Giant Resonances in the Actinide Region M A REVIEW OF THE FISSION DECAY OF THE GIANT RESONANCES IN THE ACTINIDE REGION M. Harakeh To cite this version: M. Harakeh. A REVIEW OF THE FISSION DECAY OF THE GIANT RESONANCES IN THE ACTINIDE REGION. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1984, 45 (C4), pp.C4-155-C4-184. 10.1051/jphyscol:1984413. jpa-00224078 HAL Id: jpa-00224078 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224078 Submitted on 1 Jan 1984 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C4, suppl6ment au n03, Tome 45, mars 1984 page C4-155 A REVIEW OF THE FISSION DECAY OF THE GIANT RESONANCES IN THE ACTINIDE REG I ON M.N. Harakeh Kernfysisch VersneZZer Instituut, 9747 AA Groningen, The Netherlands and NucZear Physics Lab., University of Washington, SeattZe, WA 98195, U.S.A. Resume - La decroissance par fission des resonances geantes dans la region des actinides est passee en revue. Les resultats invariablement contradic- toires de diverses experiences sont discutes. Cel les-ci comprennent des reactions inclusives de fission induite par electron ou positron, et des exp6riences ob les fragments de fission sont detectes en coincidence avec les electrons ou hadrons diffuses inelastiquement. Nous nous concentrons sur une exp6rience (a,alf) recente oO 1 'on etudie la d6croissance par fis- sion de la resonance geante monopolaire en detectant les fragments de fission en coincidence avec les a inelastiques autour de, et ?I 0' . Abstract - The fission decay of giant resonances in the actinide reqion is reviewed. Results from various experiments which are invariably conflicting are discussed. These include inclusive electzun and wsitron induced fission, as well as experiments in which fission fragments were detected in coincidence with inelastically scattered electrons or hadrons. Attention is focussed on a recent (a,a'f) experiment in which the fission decay of the giant monopole resonance was investigated by measuring fission fragments in coincidence with inelastically scattered a-particles at and around 00. I - INTRODUCTION The study uf the fission decay of the isoscalar giant resonances in the actinide region has been marred by claims and counter-claims concerning the magnitude of the fission probability of the giant quadruple resonance (QR). This is especially true for the 238~nucleus, which is the most studied by ex~~,hnentalists,where the fission probab-ility for the GQR obtained using various probes at various bombiarcling energies, ranged from 40% /1,2/ down to 4% /3/, an order. of magnitude difference1 These differences were not Limited to the now classical bouridaty line between investigations with electromagnetic probes versus those Wewith ha&.orric prolx?s, but even the results obtained with electmmagnetic probes were in disagreement. The same was true for experiments with hadronic probes. At the heart of the issue, of course, is the question of whether the decay of the GQR into fission is dominated by statistical conskderations or by direct fission ifecay. The first point of view stems from the general belief that the fission process for moderate excitation energies and low angular momenta takes a very long time (perhaps orders of magnitude longer) compared to the transit time needed for a bound nucleon to cross the boundaries of the nucleus (which is of the order of a 2x10-~* sec). During this time the nucleus, which is initially excited into the collective lp-lh giant resonance mode by a Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1984413 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE direct reaction such as inelastic hadron or electron scattering, would have enough time to mix into the more complicated 2p2h states which in turn spread into the more complicated 3p3h states, and so on and so forth until the equilibrated compound nuclear stage is reached. At this stage the fission decay probability is completely determined by the density of states at the saddle point versus ttle density of states in the (A-1) nucleus because of competition with neutron decay (the other dominant decay channel). This point of view is supported by experimental observation of the fission decay of the isovector giant dipole resonance (GDR). For the nuclei 232T?1 and 238~it is found /4,5/ to have fission probabilities similar to the Fission probabilities obtained from the (n,f) compound nuclear reaction at 2 similar excitation energies, and also agrees with the Z /A Systematics from cornpourid nuclear fission probabilities as extrapolated from heavier nuclei /6/. 'l't~esecond pint of view stems from the idea that the small amplitude oscillation of the giant resonances, especially the isoscalar ones and in pazkicular the GQR, can couple strongly to the large amplitude oscillation of the Fission We. Therefore once the nucleus gets a small kick which starts it oscillating in a giant resonance mx3e it is easily driven in the direction of Fission. In this case the fission Will not take a considerable time to occur. This will have the following consequences on both the fission probability of the giant resonance and on the angular correlations of the Fission fragments: i) the fission probability of the giant resonance will be considerably larger than that of the compound nucleus, and ii) the angular correlation will be characteristic of the initial K-value (here K refers to the projection of the total angular momentum on the symmetry axis of the nucleus) of the excited giant resonance. Interestingly enough the interpretations of tne experimentally obtained fission probabilities for the WR in 238~did not always conform with either of the above ideas. For instance, in one experiment /1,2/ where a lxrge fission probability was deduced for the GQR (about a factor of two larger. than that of the GDR) t?le authors tried to justify /2/ their results on the basis of a statistical morlel calculation. Unfortunately, tttis was based on the wrong assumption that the Ireigtlts of the fission barriers ae different for positive and negative parity states for all excitation energies. If this were true, it could indeed lead Co 1aZge+ differences in the fission probabilities of the GDR (J~.- 1-) and the GQR (J= = 2 ) since the fission probability is determined by the density of states above the barrier. However, fission probabilities could differ substantially only al: excitation energies slightly above the barrier because of the different excitation energies of low-lying positive and negative parity transition states above the barrier. At higher excitation energies above the barrier the densities of positive and negative parity states are expected to be the same, which should lead to similar fission probabilities for them. In another experiment /3/, where conversely a very low fission probakxility was deduced for the GQR (about a factor of five less than that of the GDR), the authors conjectured /3/ that their data supported a strong coupling between the GQR mode and the fission mode because experimentally they observed a peak at the +location of the GQR which apparently had an angular distribution similar to a = 0 component. I therefore have the difficult job of reviewing these conflicting reports on the fission decay of the isoscalax giant resonances in the actinide region. Alt?~ougll this seems like a formidable task, I will try to cover most of what ha8 Wen published on the subject up till now. However, some very interesting results on the fission probabilities of the various isoscalar giant resonances in 238~llave been published recently /3,7,8/ since my last review /9/ on this subject. These results include i) a coincidence electrofission 238~(e,e*f)experiment /7/ which measured the sum of E2 and EO strength from the first fission barrier up to 11.7 MeV, ii) a measurement /3/ of the fission probability in the region of the 3fiw hiyh energy octupole resonance (HEOR) by inelastic a-scattering at E 172 MeV and iii) the a - measurement /8/ of the fission decay of the monopole resonance investigated by studying fission in coincidence with inelastically scattered a-particles detected at and around 00. I1 - FISSION INDUCED BY ELECTROMAGNETIC PROBES Photoabsorption cross sections are completely dominated by electric dipole y-absorption. Thus for the past four decades photonuclear reactions have been used to investigate the various properties of the GDR and in particular its decay properties. In the actinide region both the (yen) and the (y,f) reactions have been studied for 232Th and 238~by two groups /4,5/ with reasonable agreement between the experimental results. For 238~the differential cross sections differ by 15% where the quoted systematic uncertainty for the Livermore data /5/ is s 7% and for the Saclay data /4/ is < 10%. The Livermore group /5/ has also studied the above photonuclear reactions on other nuclei in the actinide region. Their results Showed that the fission probabilities for 232Th and 238~were essentially flat Ccom 1 7 MeV up to the second chance fission thresholds with the deduced fission probabilities being in agreement with those obtained from the compound nuclear (n,f) reactions and 2 the Z /A systematics /6/. The fission probability of the GDR in the region of 7-12 MeV in 23e~,which will serve as a standard against which tt~efission probabilities of the iSoScalar giant resonances will be compared, was found from the photofission experiments /5/ to be Pf = 0.22i0.02.
Recommended publications
  • Stanley Hanna Papers SC1256
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8057mnv No online items Guide to the Stanley Hanna papers SC1256 Jenny Johnson Department of Special Collections and University Archives February 2017 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Stanley Hanna SC1256 1 papers SC1256 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Stanley Hanna papers creator: Hanna, Stanley S. Identifier/Call Number: SC1256 Physical Description: 24 Linear Feet(16 cartons) Date (inclusive): 1938-2002 Language of Material: The materials are in English. Conditions Governing Access The materials are open for research use. Audio-visual materials are not available in original format, and must be reformatted to a digital use copy. Conditions Governing Use All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94305-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. See: http://library.stanford.edu/spc/using-collections/permission-publish. Restrictions also apply to digital representations of the original materials. Use of digital files is restricted to research and educational purposes. Preferred Citation [identification of item], Stanley Hanna papers (SC1256). Department of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Biographical / Historical Stanley Hanna earned an A.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Levels of Light Nuclei a = 12
    12Revised Manuscript 08 October 2020 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 12 J.H. Kelley a,b, J.E. Purcell a,d, and C.G. Sheu a,c aTriangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, NC 27708-0308 bDepartment of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202 cDepartment of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0305 dDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 12 was published in Nuclear Physics A968 (2017), p. 71. This version of A = 12 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors dis- covered after the article went to press. The introduction has been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers are in the NNDC/TUNL format. (References closed, 2016) The work is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics, under: Grant No. DE-FG02- 97ER41042 (North Carolina State University); Grant No. DE-FG02-97ER41033 (Duke University). Nucl. Phys. A968 (2016) 71 A = 12 Table of Contents for A = 12 Below is a list of links for items found within the PDF document or on this website. A. Some electromagnetic transitions in A = 12: Table 2 B. Nuclides: 12He, 12Li, 12Be, 12B, 12C, 12N, 12O C. Tables of Recommended Level Energies: Table 12.1: Energy levels of 12Li Table 12.2: Energy levels of 12Be Table 12.5: Energy levels of 12B Table 12.13: Energy levels of 12C Table 12.44: Energy levels of 12N Table 12.52: Energy levels of 12O D. References E. Figures: 12Be, 12B, 12C, 13B β−n-decay scheme, 13O β+p-decay scheme, 12N, 12O, Isobar diagram F.
    [Show full text]
  • National Uses and Needs for Separated Stable Isotopes in Physics, Chemistry, and Geoscience Research
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Title NATIONAL USES AND NEEDS FOR SEPARATED STABLE ISOTOPES IN PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, AND GEOSCIENCE RESEARCH Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vr147z8 Author Zisman, M.S. Publication Date 1982 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California I:O'T , r—rr->EIU.EGlB'-E.lt - -'icsfaviiiaSle -'-rissibleavail- LBL-14068 Plenary talk at the Workshop on Stable Isotopes and Derived Radioisotopes, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, February 3-4, 1982. NATIONAL USES AND NEEDS FOR SEPARATED STABLE ISOTOPES IN PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, AND GEOSCENCE RESEARCH Michael S. Zisman Nuclear Science Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 LDL—1406C January, 1982 DES2 013015 Abstract Present uss3 of separated stable isotopes in the fields of physics, chemistry, and the geosciences have been surveyed to identify current supply problems and to determine future needs. Demand for separated isotopes remains strong, with 220 different nuclides having been used in the past three years. The largest needs, in terms of both quantity and variety of isotopes, are found in nuclear physics research. Current problems include a lack of availability of many nuclides, unsatisfactory enrichment of rare species, and prohibitively high costs for certain important isotopes. It is expected that demands for separated isotopes will remain roughly at present levels, although there will be a shift toward more requests for highly enriched rare isotopes. Significantly greater use will be made of neutron-rich nuclides below A=1D0 for producing exotic ion beams at various accelerators. Use of transition metal nuclei for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy will expand.
    [Show full text]
  • Recoilless Gamma-Ray Lasers
    Recoilless gamma-ray lasers George C. Baldwin and Johndale C. Solem* Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 This review is addressed to the development of lasers that might generate coherent radiation at ultrashort wavelengths by stimulating recoilless nuclear transitions in solids. First, the authors review the basic physics of stimulated emission, superradiance and the kinetics of lasing, with particular attention to those aspects that characterize recoilless nuclear transitions in solid hosts. Then they classify the various approaches to pumping that have been proposed for resolving the ‘‘graser dilemma’’—that the pump can destroy the conditions essential to gain—and discuss the general requirements for specification of an active nuclide and its solid host. The authors then classify and review those graser systems proposed since 1980 and prior to July 1996 in the published literature of the field, namely, (1) those that would pump directly, either with radiation or with intense bursts of neutrons; (2) those that would pump indirectly by first generating a nuclear isomer; (3) those that would eliminate the need for population inversion; and (4) several miscellaneous concepts. The significance of recent relevant experiments is described and discussed, and, finally, recommendations for future research are made. [S0034-6861(97)00504-7] CONTENTS a. Radiative pump 1096 b. Neutron pump 1096 3. Indirect pumping 1096 I. Introduction 1086 a. Two-step pumping 1096 A. Purpose of this article 1086 b. Two-stage pumping 1097 B. Why grasers? 1086 4. Mixed-radiation pumps 1097 C. Historical background 1087 D. Pumping below inversion 1097 1. Conceptual overview 1087 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Photoneutron Production Inside the APS Storage Ring During Normal Operation Is Giant Nuclear Dipole Resonance
    LS-294 Neutron Fluence Estimates Inside the APS Storage Ring During Normal Operation P.K. Job and J. Alderman Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory April 2002 Neutron Fluence Estimates Inside the APS Storage Ring During Normal Operation P.K. Job and J. Alderman Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory April 2002 Introduction In an electron storage ring, neutrons are generated as a result of the electron beam interaction with high-Z materials, such as scrapers and collimators [1]. When the energy of the incident electron beam is sufficiently high, it can produce high-energy photons, which subsequently interact with a nucleus, resulting in the emission of nucleons. This interaction is known as a photonuclear interaction. For photons with energies above the typical binding energy of nucleons (>5-15 MeV), photonuclear interaction generally leads to emission of photoneutrons as well as photoprotons. Photonuclear interaction is mainly the result of three specific processes: giant nuclear dipole resonance, quasi- deuteron production and decay, and intranuclear cascade generated via photopion production. Photoneutron Production Giant nuclear dipole resonance [2] results if the energy of the incident photons is close to the binding energy of the nucleons (>5-15 MeV). In this case, photoabsorption leads to relative displacement of tightly bound neutrons and protons inside the nucleus, resulting in a giant resonance condition. Absorption of the incident photons excites the nucleus to a higher discrete energy state, and the extra energy is emitted in the form of neutrons. For heavy nuclei, the giant resonance decays mainly by neutron emission (γ,n). Some contribution from double neutron emission (γ,2n) is also possible for higher photon energies.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Resonances in Excited Nuclei
    Giant Resonances in Excited Nuclei DM Brink, Department of Physics, Oxford University Talk presented at the Workshop on "Chaos and Collectivity in Many Body Systems" at the PMIPKS, Dresden, Germany, March 5-8 2008. Coordinator Prof Mahir Hussein. 1. Synopsis The purpose of these notes is to give some historical background about the Axel-Brink hypothesis and its relation to the experimental study of giant resonances in excited nuclei. The focus will be on the giant dipole resonance (GDR). Topics to be covered: 1. Giant dipole resonances based on nuclear ground states. 2. History of the giant dipole resonance. 3. Theory of the Γ-width of neutron resonances. 4. The GDR in excited nuclei. 2. Examples of giant dipole resonances Many examples of photoneutron cross sections are given in the review article of Berman and Fultz (Rev. Mod. Phys. 47 (1975) 713). The photoneutron cross section for 208 Pb is the classical example of a giant resonance in a heavy spherical nucleus. The resonance is narrow and its shape can be fitted quite well a Lorentz resonance Γ2E2 σ / 2 2 2 2 2 (1) (E − Em) − Γ E with a mean energy Em =13.5 MeV and a width Γ = 4 MeV. Another case is the photo-neutron cross section for 197 Au. The resonance 208 peak is at Em = 13.7 MeV, nearly the same as for Pb, the width Γ = 4.76 MeV is a little larger. The nucleus 160 Gd is non-spherical with a prolate deformation. The pho- tonuclear cross section has two peaks; one corresponding to a dipole vibration 1 along the axis of deformation and the other perpendicular to the axis of de- formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Nucleus - Wikipedia
    Atomic nucleus - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_nucleus#Composition_and_shape Atomic nucleus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The atomic nucleus is the small, dense region consisting of protons and neutrons at the center of an atom, discovered in 1911 by Ernest Rutherford based on the 1909 Geiger–Marsden gold foil experiment. After the discovery of the neutron in 1932, models for a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons were quickly developed by Dmitri Ivanenko[1] and Werner Heisenberg.[2][3] [4][5][6] Almost all of the mass of an atom is located in the nucleus, with a very small contribution from the electron cloud. Protons and neutrons are bound together to form a nucleus by the nuclear force. The diameter of the nucleus is in the range of 1.75 fm(1.75 × 10−15 m) for hydrogen (the diameter of a single proton)[7] to about 15 fm for the heaviest atoms, such as uranium. These dimensions are much smaller than the diameter of the atom itself (nucleus + electron cloud), by a factor of about 23,000 A model of the atomic nucleus showing (uranium) to about 145,000 (hydrogen). it as a compact bundle of the two types of nucleons: protons (red) and neutrons The branch of physics concerned with the study and understanding of the (blue). In this diagram, protons and atomic nucleus, including its composition and the forces which bind it together, neutrons look like little balls stuck is called nuclear physics. together, but an actual nucleus (as understood by modern nuclear physics) cannot be explained like this, but only Contents by using quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Henryk Nlewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics
    The Henryk Nlewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Main site: ul. Radzikowskiego 152 31-342 Krakdw tel: (48 12) 37 00 40 fax:(4812)375441 tix:3224 61 e-mail: [email protected] High Energy Department: ul. Kawiory 26 A 30-055 Krakdw tel: (48 12) 33 33 66, 33 68 02 fax: (48 12) 33 38 84 tlx: 32 22 94 e-mail: [email protected] Annual 1993 Krakow 1994 Report No 1669 PRINTED AT THE HENRYK NIEWODNICZANSKI INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS Cover designed by J. Grebosz Editorial Board: J. Bartke, D. Erbel (Secretary), B. Fornal, L. Friendl, J. Grebosz, M. Krygowska-Doniec, P. Malecki, M. Waligorski and H. Wojciechowski. e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Kopia offsetowa, druk i oprawa: DRUKARNIA IFJ Wspotpraca wydawnicza: SEKCJA WYDAWNICTW DZIAtU INFORMACJI NAUKOWEJ IFJ Wydanie I zam. 29/94 NaWad 450 egz. Henryk Niewodniczanski 1900 - 1968 25 years ago, on 20 December 1968, Professor Henryk Niewodniczanski, the founder of our Institute, died. To commemorate this event, we held a small session to recall his achievements as a scientist, teacher and administrator. Professor Niewodniczanski, a brilliant experimental physicist, began his research in the early twenties in the field of atomic optics. He discovered the forbidden dipole magnetic transition in Pb atoms. His interest in nuclear physics was aroused by Lord Rutherford of Nelson in whose laboratory he worked in the middle 'thirties. After World War II Professor Niewodniczariski initiated research in nuclear physics at the Jagellonian University. His enthusiasm and great organizational talent resulted in the establishment of the Institute of Nuclear Physics in Krakow under his directorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Ion Excitation and Photon Decay of Giant Resonances F
    HEAVY ION EXCITATION AND PHOTON DECAY OF GIANT RESONANCES F. Bertrand, J. Beene, T. Sjoreen To cite this version: F. Bertrand, J. Beene, T. Sjoreen. HEAVY ION EXCITATION AND PHOTON DECAY OF GIANT RESONANCES. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1984, 45 (C4), pp.C4-99-C4-114. 10.1051/jphyscol:1984410. jpa-00224075 HAL Id: jpa-00224075 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224075 Submitted on 1 Jan 1984 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque Ci, supplément au n°3, Tome 45, mars 1984 page C4-99 HEAVY ION EXCITATION AND PHOTON DECAY OF GIANT RESONANCES F.E. Bertram!, J.R. Beetle and T.P. Sjoreen Oak Ridge National Laboratory*, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 378S0, U.S.A. Résumé - On présente des résultats sur l'excitation de résonances géantes multipolaires par diffusion inélastique de 160 à 25 MeV/nucléon. On a obtenu de grandes sections efficaces d'excitation de la résonance géante quadrupolaire ainsi qu'un très grand rapport du pic de la résonance sur le continuum. Dans l'excitation des résonances géantes par 170 , la décroissance y dans la région de la résonance quadrupolaire a été mesurée.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
    University of Groningen Study of compression modes in 56Ni using an active target Bagchi, Soumya IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Bagchi, S. (2015). Study of compression modes in 56Ni using an active target. University of Groningen. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 28-09-2021 Chapter 1 Introduction In 2015, the nuclear-physics community celebrates the 30th anniversary of the first genuine work on radioactive ion beams [1] used to study the properties of atomic nuclei.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Resonances in Atomic Nuclei
    Charles University in Prague Faculty of Mathematics and Physics MASTER THESIS Anton Repko Giant Resonances in Atomic Nuclei Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Supervisor of the master thesis: prof. RNDr. Jan Kvasil, DrSc. Study programme: Physics Specialization: Nuclear and Subnuclear Physics Prague 2011 Univerzita Karlova v Praze Matematicko-fyzikální fakulta DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCE Anton Repko Gigantické rezonance v atomových jádrech Ústav £ásticové a jaderné fyziky Vedoucí diplomové práce: prof. RNDr. Jan Kvasil, DrSc. Studijní program: Fyzika Studijní obor: Jaderná a subjaderná fyzika Praha 2011 I would like to thank my supervisor prof. Jan Kvasil for his support and patient explanation of the theoretical and practical aspects of nuclear phenomena and their description. Prohla²uji, ºe jsem tuto diplomovou práci vypracoval samostatn¥ a výhradn¥ s pouºitím citovaných pramen·, literatury a dal²ích odborných zdroj·. Beru na v¥domí, ºe se na moji práci vztahují práva a povinnosti vyplývající ze zákona £. 121/2000 Sb., autorského zákona v platném zn¥ní, zejména skute£nost, ºe Univerzita Karlova v Praze má právo na uzav°ení licen£ní smlouvy o uºití této práce jako ²kolního díla podle 60 odst. 1 autorského zákona. V Praze dne .................... Podpis autora Název práce: Gigantické rezonance v atomových jádrech Autor: Anton Repko Katedra: Ústav £ásticové a jaderné fyziky Vedoucí diplomové práce: prof. RNDr. Jan Kvasil, DrSc., ÚJF Abstrakt: Skyrme funkcionál je £asto pouºíván k popisu základních stav· i dy- namických vlastností atomových jader. V této práci byla pro mikroskopický self- konzistentní popis dynamických vlastností pouºita separabilní Random Phase Approximation (SRPA) metoda vycházející ze Skyrme funkcionálu. Tato práce popisuje teorii Skyrme Hartree-Fock a SRPA a p°edkládá numerické výpo£ty E1 a M1 gigantických rezonancí provedené pro sérii sférických jader 40Ca56Fe.
    [Show full text]
  • (7,N) Reaction in the Giant Resonance Region
    SE0300210 LUNFD6-NFFR-- 1020 High-Resolution Measurement of the 4 He (7,n) Reaction in the Giant Resonance Region Bj6rn Nilsson Department of Physics Lund University 2003 Sr High-Resolution Measurement of the 'He(-y, n) Reaction in the Giant Resonance Region Bj6rn Nilsson Lund 2003 SI 27 LUND UNIVERSITY Akademisk avhandling som f6r avldggande av filosofie doktorsexamen vid Lunds Universitets matematisk-naturvetenskapliga fakultet offentli- gen kommer att f6rsvaras i f6reldsningssal B ph Fysiska Institutionen fredagen den 11 april 2003 klockan 13.15. Fakultetsopponent dr Profes- sor Gerald Feldman, The George Washington University, D C, USA. Division of Nuclear Physics Department of Physics S61vegata 14 S-223 62 Lund Sweden Copyright 2003 by Bj6rn Nilsson ISBN 91-628-5615-4 Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund 2003 Organization Document name LUND UNIVERSITY DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Department of Physics Date of Issue 2003-03-19 Division of Nuclear Physics Box 118 Sponsoring organization SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden Author(s) Bjorn Nilsson Title and subtitle I-figh-Resolution. Measurement of the 4He(gn) Reaction in the Giant Resonance Region Abstract A comprehensive near-threshold 411e(gn) absolute cross section memurement has been performed at the high-resolution tagged-photon facility MAX-lab located in Lund. Sweden. The 23 < Eg < 42 MeV tagged photons (covering the Giant Dipole Resonance energy region) were directed towards a liquid 4He target, and knocked-out neutrons were detected in a pair of 60 cm x 60 cm vetoed NE213A liquid scintillator arrays. The intense and varying charge-neutral experimental backgrounds were carefully quantified and removed from the data using a precision fitting procedure.
    [Show full text]