DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography (Pdf) RECREATION USE VALUES BIBLIOGRAPHY 1958-2015 October 26, 2016 Randall S. Rosenberger Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society College of Forestry Oregon State University Corvallis, OR RECREATION USE VALUES BIBLIOGRAPHY This bibliography continues to be a ‘work-in-progress’. If you identify any of your work that should be included in this bibliography, please send a digital copy to [email protected]; I’ll make sure they are entered in the next generation of this bibliography and associated database. The primary funding agencies for this work include US Environmental Protection Agency and the USDA Forest Service. I thank everyone in this field of scientific inquiry for their openness and willingness to share their time. Several individuals have been instrumental in the re-construction of the RUVD in 2006, including John Loomis, Kerry Smith, and Ross Arnold for opening up their collections to me. Students that have significantly contributed to the RUVD coding include Arvin Vista, Claire Cvitanovich, and Alyssa Shanks. This latest update to the RUVD coincided with an update to the Benefit Transfer Toolkit, in which I collaborated with Leslie Richardson. 1 RECREATION USE VALUES BIBLIOGRAPHY Database Reference Code Abdullah, N.M.B.R. 1988. Estimation of average and incremental net economic values of Oregon ocean sport caught salmon: An aggregated travel cost approach. PhD 439 dissertation. Oregon State University. 234p. Acharya, R.N., L.U. Hatch and H.A. Clonts. 2003. The role of on-site time in recreational demand for wilderness. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 443 35(1):159-169. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere and M. Williams. 1994. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental 253 Economics and Management 26:271-292. Adamowicz, W., S. Jennings and A. Coyne. 1990. A sequential choice model of 218 recreation behavior. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15(1):91-99. Adamowicz, W.L. 1988. Extramarket benefit evaluation and revealed preference. 438 Ph.D. dissertation. University of Minnesota. 224p. Adamowicz, W.L. and W.E. Phillips. 1983. A comparison of extra market benefit 141 evaluation techniques. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 31:401-412. Adams, R.M., O. Bergland, W.N. Musser, S.L. Johnson and L.M. Musser. 1989. User fees and equity issues in public hunting expenditures: The case of ring-necked pheasant 209 in Oregon. Land Economics 65(4):376-385. Adler, L.L. 1993. Measuring the value of recreation: The impacts of substitute sites. 433 PhD dissertation. Laramie, WY: The University of Wyoming. 129p. Adrangi, B. 1982. Changes in economic efficiency resulting from allocation of Oregon national forest land to skiing. PhD dissertation. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. 309 163p. Agnello, R.J. and L.G. Anderson. 1984. The value of fish and fishing days: A partial solution to managing recreational fisheries with stock externalities. Working Paper. 310 University of Delaware. 21p. Agnello, R.J. and Y. Han. 1993. Substitute site measures in a varying parameters model 490 with application to recreational fishing. Marine Resource Economics 8:65-77. Ahn, S., J.E. de Steiguer, R.B. Palmquist and T.P. Holmes. 2000. Economic analysis of the potential impact of climate change on recreational trout fishing in the southern 517 Appalachian Mountains: An application of a nested multinomial logit model. Climate Change 45:493-509. Aiken, R. 2009. Net Economic Values for Wildlife-Related Recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated 534 Recreation. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service. 32p. Aiken,R. and G.P. La Rouche. 2003. Net Economic Values for Wildlife-Related Recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and 342 Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service. 28p. Amoako-Tuffour, J. and R. Martinez-Espineira. 2012. Leisure and the net opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand analysis: An application to Gros Morne National 522 Park. Journal of Applied Economics XV(1):25-49. 2 RECREATION USE VALUES BIBLIOGRAPHY Database Reference Code Anderson, D.M.. 2010. Estimating the economic value of ice climbing in Hyalite Canyon: An application of travel cost count data models that account for excess zeros. 523 Journal of Environmental Management 91:1012–1020. Atkinson, S.E., T.D. Crocker, C. Nowell, B. Kimble, J. Thompson and G. Watts. 1986. Socio-economic Impact Analysis of the Proposed Relocation of Fishing Bridge Facilities 427 in Yellowstone National Park. Draft Report. Laramie, WY: Institute for Policy Research, University of Wyoming. 54p. Azevedo, C.D., J.A. Herriges and C.L. Kling. 2003. Combining revealed and stated preferences: Consistency tests and their interpretation. American Journal of Agricultural 468 Economics 85(3):525-537. Balkan, E. and J.R. Kahn. 1988. The value of changes in deer hunting quality: A travel 194 cost approach. Applied Economics 20(4):533-539. Barrick, K.A. 1986. Option value in relation to distance effects and selected user characteristics for the Washakie Wilderness, northwest Wyoming. In R.C. Lucas [comp.], Proceedings -- National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research. 176 General Technical Report INT-212. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Pp 411-422. Bayless, D.S., J.C. Bergstrom, M.L. Messonnier and H.K. Cordell. 1994. Assessing the demand for designated wildlife viewing sites. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure 254 Marketing 2(3):75-93. Beardsley, W.G. 1970. Economic value of recreation benefits determined by three methods. Research Note RM-176. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, 344 Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 5p. Bell, F.W., P.E. Sorensen and V.R. Leeworthy. 1982. The economic impact and valuation of saltwater recreational fisheries in Florida. Sea Grant Report ID FLSGP-T- 491 82-005. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University, Florida Sea Grant College Program. 134p. Bennett, M., B. Provencher and R. Bishop. 2004. Experience, expectations and hindsight: Evidence of a cognitive wedge in stated preference retrospectives. Staff Paper 461 No. 468. Madison, WI: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economic, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 28p. Bergstrom, J.C. and H.K. Cordell. 1991. An analysis of the demand for and value of 227 outdoor recreation in the United States. Journal of Leisure Research 23(1):67-86. Bergstrom, J.C., J.H. Dorfman and J.B. Loomis. 2004. Estuary management and 456 recreational fishing benefits. Coastal Management 32:417-432. Bergstrom, J.C., J.R. Stoll, J.P. Titre and V.L. Wright. 1990. Economic value of wetlands-based recreation. Ecological Economics 2(2):129-147. [Cross with Stoll, 219 Bergstrom and Titre 1989] Betz, C.J., J.C. Bergstrom and J.M. Bowker. 2003. A contingent trip model for estimating rail-trail demand. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 305 46(1):79-96. 3 RECREATION USE VALUES BIBLIOGRAPHY Database Reference Code Bhat, G., J. Bergstrom, R.J. Teasley, J.M. Bowker and H.K. Cordell. 1998. An ecoregional approach to the economic valuation of land and water based recreation in the 271 United States. Environmental Management 22(1):69-77. Bhat, M.G. 2003. Application of non-market valuation to the Florida Keys marine 467 reserve management. Journal of Environmental Management 67:315-325. Bilgic, A. and W.J. Florkowski. 2007. Application of a hurdle negative binomial count data model to demand for bass fishing in the southeastern United States. Journal of 525 Environmental Management 67:315-325. Bin, O., C.E. Landry, C.L. Ellis and H. Vogelsong. 2005. Some consumer surplus 466 estimates for North Carolina beaches. Marine Resource Economics 20(2):145-161. Bishop, R.C., K.J. Boyle, M.P. Welsh, R.M Baumgartner and P.R. Rathbun. 1987. Glen Canyon Dam releases and downstream recreation: An analysis of user preferences and economic values. Final Report to the Recreation Subteam of the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies. Madison, WI: HBRS. 202p. [Cross-listed with Boyle, K.J., M.P. Welsh, R.C. Bishop and R.M. Baumgartner. 1988. Analyzing the effects of Glen Canyon Dam releases on Colorado River recreation using scenarios of unexperienced flow conditions. In J.B. Loomis (comp.), Western Regional Research Publication W- 133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning, Interim Report. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis. Pp 111-130.][Bishop, R.C., C.A. Brown, M.P. Welsh 196 and K.J. Boyle. 1989. Grand Canyon recreation and Glen Canyon Dam operations: An economic evaluation. In K.J. Boyle and T. Heekin, Western Regional Research Project W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resource Planning, Interim Report 2. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine. Pp 407- 435.][Bishop, R.C., C.A. Brown, M.P. Welsh and K.J. Boyle. 1992. Contingent valuation of changes in recreational quality: Glen Canyon dam operations and Grand Canyon recreational. Proceedings of a Meeting of the Resource Policy Consortium, in Management of Public Resources. Washington, DC.] Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein and M.J. Kealy. 1983. Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market. Natural Resources Journal 23:619-633. [Bishop, R.C. and T.A. Heberlein. 1980. Simulated markets, hypothetical markets and travel cost analysis. Report No. 187. Madison, WI: Department of 142 Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin. For TCM without time value] [Bishop, R.C., and T.A. Heberlein. 1979. Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(5):926-930. For TCM with time valued at 0.25 wage rate.] Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Report. Madison, WI: Department of Agricultural 346 Economics, University of Wisconsin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • September 11, 2009 . Dear Interested Citizen, I Would Like to Thank You For
    United States Forest White Mountain National Forest 1171 NH Route 175 Department of Service Pemigewasset Ranger District Holderness, NH 03245-5031 Agriculture Comm: (603) 536-1315 TTY: (603) 536-3281 File 2320 Code: Date: September 11, 2009 . Dear Interested Citizen, I would like to thank you for your interest in the Pemigewasset Bridge Removal Project. My decision is to move forward with the project. The enclosed Decision Memo provides detail as to the reasons for my decision. These documents are also posted on our White Mountain National Forest web site: www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/white_mountain/projects/projects/. I have reviewed the public comment letters and the analysis documents. I am satisfied that this project is beneficial, and can safely proceed with no significant adverse environmental effect to the National Forest, the Pemigewasset Wilderness or the surrounding area. My planning staff and I have appreciated the public involvement on this project. The goal of public involvement efforts in our programs and projects is to improve decisions. We look forward to your continued involvement in projects on the Pemigewasset Ranger District. Sincerely, /S/ MOLLY FULLER MOLLY FULLER District Ranger Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper Pemigewasset United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Forest Service Eastern Bridge Removal Region Decision Memo Town of Lincoln Grafton County, NH Pemigewasset Ranger District September 2009 For Information Contact: John Marunowski Pemigewasset Ranger District White Mountain National Forest 1171 NH Rte 175 Holderness, NH 03245 Telephone: 603 536-1315 Ext 4016 White Mountain National Forest FAX: 603 536-5147 This document is available in large print.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004
    NON-PROFIT Office of Advancement ORGANIZATION ALUMNI MAGAZINE COLBY-SAWYER Colby-Sawyer College U.S. POSTAGE 541 Main Street PAID New London, NH 03257 LEWISTON, ME PERMIT 82 C LBY-SAWYER CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED ALUMNI MAGAZINE I NSIDE: FALL/WINTER 2004 The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 F ALL/WINTER 2004 Annual Report Issue EDITOR BOARD OF TRUSTEES David R. Morcom Anne Winton Black ’73, ’75 CLASS NOTES EDITORS Chair Tracey Austin Ye ar of Gaye LaCasce Philip H. Jordan Jr. Vice-Chair CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Tracey Austin Robin L. Mead ’72 the Arts Jeremiah Chila ’04 Executive Secretary Cathy DeShano Ye ar of Nicole Eaton ’06 William S. Berger Donald A. Hasseltine Pamela Stanley Bright ’61 Adam S. Kamras Alice W. Brown Gaye LaCasce Lo-Yi Chan his month marks the launch of the Year of the Arts, a David R. Morcom Timothy C. Coughlin P’00 Tmultifaceted initiative that will bring arts faculty members to meet Kimberly Swick Slover Peter D. Danforth P’83, ’84, GP’02 the Arts Leslie Wright Dow ’57 with groups of alumni and friends around the country. We will host VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADVANCEMENT Stephen W. Ensign gatherings in art museums and galleries in a variety of cities, and Donald A. Hasseltine Eleanor Morrison Goldthwait ’51 are looking forward to engaging hundreds of alumni and friends in Suzanne Simons Hammond ’66 conversations about art, which will be led by our faculty experts. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT Patricia Driggs Kelsey We also look forward to sharing information about Colby-Sawyer’s Beth Cahill Joyce Juskalian Kolligian ’55 robust arts curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • Updates to Published Amc Books and Maps
    UPDATES TO PUBLISHED AMC BOOKS AND MAPS From time to time, information covered in our books may Page 45, Edmands Path change in the field. For example, a trail may be relocated. In 2019, Mt. Clinton Rd. was closed between the Edmands Since a new edition of the book may not be immediately avail- Path trailhead and the Cog Railway Base Rd. The Edmands able, this page will regularly offer updates to our most pop- Path trailhead can only be accessed via Mt. Clinton Rd. from ular AMC books. Bookmark this page and check here often, US 302 just north of the AMC Highland Center. especially before heading out on a trip. If you find that a route described in one of our guides has changed or a description Page 51, Dry River Trail contains an error, please email [email protected]. An October 2017 storm caused additional major washouts on the lower part of the Dry River Trail. The trail may be very TRAIL GUIDES difficult to follow in places. Page 60, Rocky Branch Trail MAINE MOUNTAIN GUIDE, 11TH EDITION (2018) Page 339 Due to storm damage, the northern section of Rocky Branch Rd. (FR 27) has been closed indefinitely by the WMNF. The Molly Lockett’s Cave is named for Molly Ockett, an Abenaki road is gated at 2.5 mi. from US 302. To reach the southern woman who was baptized and given the name Mary Agatha. end of Rocky Branch Trail, hikers must park by this gate and This could have been pronounced “Molly Agat” or “Molly walk 1.6 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • White Mountain National Forest Reg E S Fore a of Dep Un a Er Gric S I T V Tern Ed a I on I S C U R T T E L
    Eastside Road and Trail Repair Project United States Department of Lincoln, Grafton County, NH Agriculture Forest Forest Service Environmental Analysis Eastern Region Pemigewasset Ranger District December 2012 National Mountain For Information Contact: Stacy Lemieux White Mountain National Forest 71 White Mountain Drive Campton, NH 03223 Phone: 603 536-6222 Fax: 603 536-3685 www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/white_mountain White Eastside Road and Trail Repair Project Environmental Assessment This document is available in large print. Contact the Pemigewasset Ranger District White Mountain National Forest 603-536-6222 TTY 603-536-3665 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activi- ties on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720- 5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on Recycled Paper Cover photo: Culvert on Eastside Road/Trail washed out by Tropical Storm Irene. WMNF photo. 2 Eastside Road and Trail Repair Project
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Within the Context of Larger Systems; 1999 May 23–27; Missoula, MT
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Science in a Forest Service Time of Change Conference Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings Volume 2: Wilderness Within RMRS-P-15-VOL-2 the Context of Larger Systems September 2000 Missoula, Montana May 23–27, 1999 Abstract McCool, Stephen F.; Cole, David N.; Borrie, William T.; O’Loughlin, Jennifer, comps. 2000. Wilderness science in a time of change conference—Volume 2: Wilderness within the context of larger systems; 1999 May 23–27; Missoula, MT. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Thirty-eight papers related to the theme of wilderness in the context of larger systems are included. Three overview papers synthesize existing knowledge and research about wilderness economics, relationships between wilderness and surrounding social communities, and relation- ships between wilderness and surrounding ecological communities and processes. Other papers deal with wilderness meanings and debates; wilderness within larger ecosystems; and social, economic, and policy issues. Keywords: boundaries, ecological disturbance, ecosystem management, regional analysis, wilderness economics, wilderness perception RMRS-P-15-VOL-1. Wilderness science in a time of change conference—Volume 1: Changing perspectives and future directions. RMRS-P-15-VOL-2. Wilderness science in a time of change conference—Volume 2: Wilderness within the context of larger systems. RMRS-P-15-VOL-3. Wilderness science in a time of change conference—Volume 3: Wilderness as a place for scientific inquiry. RMRS-P-15-VOL-4. Wilderness science in a time of change conference—Volume 4: Wilderness visitors, experiences, and visitor management.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachia Winter/Spring 2019: Complete Issue
    Appalachia Volume 70 Number 1 Winter/Spring 2019: Quests That Article 1 Wouldn't Let Go 2019 Appalachia Winter/Spring 2019: Complete Issue Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/appalachia Part of the Nonfiction Commons Recommended Citation (2019) "Appalachia Winter/Spring 2019: Complete Issue," Appalachia: Vol. 70 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/appalachia/vol70/iss1/1 This Complete Issue is brought to you for free and open access by Dartmouth Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Appalachia by an authorized editor of Dartmouth Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume LXX No. 1, Magazine No. 247 Winter/Spring 2019 Est. 1876 America’s Longest-Running Journal of Mountaineering & Conservation Appalachia Appalachian Mountain Club Boston, Massachusetts Appalachia_WS2019_FINAL_REV.indd 1 10/26/18 10:34 AM AMC MISSION Founded in 1876, the Appalachian Committee on Appalachia Mountain Club, a nonprofit organization with more than 150,000 members, Editor-in-Chief / Chair Christine Woodside advocates, and supporters, promotes the Alpina Editor Steven Jervis protection, enjoyment, and understanding Assistant Alpina Editor Michael Levy of the mountains, forests, waters, and trails of the Appalachian region. We believe these Poetry Editor Parkman Howe resources have intrinsic worth and also Book Review Editor Steve Fagin provide recreational opportunities, spiritual News and Notes Editor Sally Manikian renewal, and ecological and economic Accidents Editor Sandy Stott health for the region. Because successful conservation depends on active engagement Photography Editor Skip Weisenburger with the outdoors, we encourage people to Contributing Editors Douglass P.
    [Show full text]
  • White Mountain National Forest 71 White Mountain Drive
    Pemigewasset Wilderness Thoreau Falls Trail Bridge United States Department of Agriculture Removal Project Town of Lincoln, Grafton County Forest Service Eastern Region New Hampshire Draft Environmental Assessment Pemigewasset Ranger District August 2017 For Information Contact: J. Dan Abbe White Mountain National Forest 71 White Mountain Drive White Mountain National Forest Campton, NH 03223 Phone: 603 536-6234 Fax: 603 536-3685 http://www.fs.usda.gov/projects/whitemountain/landmanagement/projects This document is available in large print. Contact the Pemigewasset Ranger District White Mountain National Forest 603-536-6100 TTY 603-536-3665 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions partici- pating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, col- or, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance pro- gram, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or ac- tivity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • 17045 SNH-Retirement AR 2005
    NEW HAMPSHIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM A Component Unit Of The State Of New Hampshire* Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 *Please refer to footnote on the title page. NEW HAMPSHIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM INTRODUCTORY SECTION Cover: A municipal official enjoys the view from Bondcliff in the Pemigewasset Wilderness confident that the NHRS is working hard to secure her retirement. Design and Layout: Debbie K Graphics, Loudon, NH • 603-783-9812 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM A Component Unit of the State of New Hampshire* For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 Merelise O’Connor Interim Executive Director J.P.Singh Director of Finance * In accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) 14, the New Hampshire Retirement System is a component unit of the State of New Hampshire for financial reporting purposes because the State has budget oversight over admin- istrative expenses. Prepared by New Hampshire Retirement System 4 Chenell Drive Concord, New Hampshire 03301-8509 www.nh.gov/retirement/ THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NEW HAMPSHIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Section Certificate of Achievement .............................................................................................................6 Letter From the Chairman..............................................................................................................7 Board of Trustees ...........................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Camping Rules
    Reprinted May 2012 May Reprinted campsites. year round. year deep, away from water, trails, and and trails, water, from away deep, Forest Protection Areas are in effect effect in are Areas Protection Forest bother other hikers. other bother human waste in a hole 4-8 inches inches 4-8 hole a in waste human are a few examples of what might might what of examples few a are Carry out what you carry in; bury bury in; carry you what out Carry Service when planning your trip. your planning when Service control pets, cell phones, and radios radios and phones, cell pets, control • OF DISPOSE PROPERLY WASTE change. Please check with the Forest Forest the with check Please change. other people. Loud noises, out of of out noises, Loud people. other These rules are subject to to subject are rules These NOTE: Think about how your actions affect affect actions your how about Think more damage. damage. more sites where your visit could create create could visit your where sites • OTHERS OF CONSIDERATE BE sources. Avoid moderately impacted impacted moderately Avoid sources. www.fs.fed.us/r9/white of reach of bears. of reach of or 200 feet from trails and water water and trails from feet 200 or more information, or visit our website at: at: website our visit or information, more and be sure to hang your food well out out well food your hang to sure be and impacted (but be sure it’s a legal site), site), legal a it’s sure be (but impacted Please call or stop by one of our offices for for offices our of one by stop or call Please Don’t feed, chase, or harass wildlife wildlife harass or chase, feed, Don’t at sites that have already been heavily heavily been already have that sites at Stay on the trail while hiking.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2015 to 12/31/2015 White Mountain National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact White Mountain National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R9 - Eastern Region AMC Backcountry Facility - Special use management In Progress: Expected:10/2015 10/2015 Marianne Leberman Permit Renewal Scoping Start 07/01/2014 603-536-6236 CE [email protected] Description: Re-issue permits for the existing backcountry facilities (shelters and tentsites) currently operated by the Appalachian Mountain Club. No additional use or increases in capacity are proposed as part of this project. Location: UNIT - White Mountain National Forest All Units. STATE - New Hampshire. COUNTY - Coos, Grafton. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Backcountry facilities operated by AMC. Forest-wide Driveway Permit - Special use management Completed Actual: 08/12/2015 08/2015 Dylan Alden Reissuance 603-447-5448 CE [email protected] Description: Reissuance of approx. ten existing permits for driveways across National Forest system land to access private property because permits recently expired or will expire soon. Permits to be reissued for 20 years; approved activities will not change. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46068 Location: UNIT - White Mountain National Forest All Units. STATE - Maine, New Hampshire. COUNTY - Oxford, Carroll, Coos, Grafton. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Locations across the Forest. Loon Pond Dam - Watershed management In Progress: Expected:04/2016 05/2016 Jon Morrissey Reconstruction - Special use management Scoping Start 07/31/2015 970-642-4439 CE [email protected] Description: The proposal is to issue a 20-year special use permit to provide the Town of Lincoln access to the Loon Pond Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln History
    LINCOLN HISTORY 1764 Governor Benning Wentworth, the royal Governor of the Province of New Hampshire, granted 24,000 acres of land to James Avery of Norwich, Connecticut, and 64 of his relatives and friends. The Lincoln Charter was signed on January 31, 1764. Lincoln was named after Henry Fiennes Pelham-Clinton, 2nd Duke of Newcastle, 9th Earl of Lincoln, a Wentworth cousin. On the same day, Governor Wentworth signed a similar charter granting the adjoining town of Landaff to Avery and others. Avery and his associates made large investments in New Hampshire lands grants. However, none of the grantees ever lived in Lincoln let alone fulfill the conditions of the Charter which required that 5 of every 50 acres be cultivated within 5 years (1769). 1772 Governor John Wentworth declared the Lincoln Charter forfeited and re-granted Lincoln, along with most of Franconia, to Sir Francis Bernard and others. The name of this new township was Morristown, in honor of one of the grantees. 1774 Nathan Kinsman of Concord, N.H., a hatter and physician, bought 400 acres of land from William Broughton of Fairlee, VT, who had acquired the rights from one of the original grantees of Morristown. The cost was 60 pounds. 1782 Nathan Kinsman and his wife Mercy (Wheeler) moved to Lincoln, then called Morristown. He was joined by Nathan and Amos Wheeler and John and Thomas Hatch. According to the Federal Census of 1790, these 5 families, 22 inhabitants total, comprised the total population of Morristown. The area in which they settled was known as Lincoln Gore under the western slopes of the mountain to which Nathan gave his name.
    [Show full text]