DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Table 4. Otus Exhibiting Statistically Significant Differences in Abundance Between Pre and Post Pre-Vitamin D Treatment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Table 4. Otus Exhibiting Statistically Significant Differences in Abundance Between Pre and Post Pre-Vitamin D Treatment Supplementary Table 4. OTUs Exhibiting Statistically Significant Differences in Abundance between pre and post pre-Vitamin D treatment. Phylum Subphylum Family Accession P-Value Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified DQ793674.1 0.0003 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus DQ441345.1 0.0010 Firmicutes Clostridia Acetivibrio EF686638.1 0.0014 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU768484.1 0.0019 WS6 WM1006 Unclassified DQ397467.1 0.0020 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus DQ798739.1 0.0021 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU468734.1 0.0023 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU774563.1 0.0023 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU469923.1 0.0023 Firmicutes Clostridia Clostridium EF095977.1 0.0028 Firmicutes Clostridia Eubacterium DQ795602.1 0.0030 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU774409.1 0.0031 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU381636.1 0.0033 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU467336.1 0.0033 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF573244.1 0.0037 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572067.1 0.0037 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU805290.1 0.0038 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus DQ794950.1 0.0039 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus DQ797467.1 0.0041 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU802513.1 0.0041 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU747914.1 0.0041 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ777912.1 0.0042 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EF402950.1 0.0046 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU507404.1 0.0046 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804992.1 0.0049 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU460164.1 0.0050 Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Methylophaga FM242360.1 0.0050 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ804803.1 0.0053 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU237291.1 0.0055 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU469929.1 0.0057 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified DQ793455.1 0.0060 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium AY977231.1 0.0060 Actinobacteria Actinobacteridae Unclassified AB002637.1 0.0063 Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Unclassified DQ521516.1 0.0063 Actinobacteria Actinobacteridae Unclassified AM696925.1 0.0068 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EU776223.1 0.0070 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus DQ807473.1 0.0079 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ455883.1 0.0082 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF571970.1 0.0082 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804304.1 0.0083 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804569.1 0.0084 Firmicutes Bacilli Paenibacillaceae EU464951.1 0.0086 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ797321.1 0.0086 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus AY518589.1 0.0087 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU777265.1 0.0088 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ905605.1 0.0090 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU802827.1 0.0092 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF573458.1 0.0093 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ793845.1 0.0095 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572923.1 0.0096 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified DQ905437.1 0.0097 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EU009819.1 0.0099 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU803188.1 0.0101 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU462511.1 0.0105 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU748064.1 0.0106 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EU465645.1 0.0108 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804614.1 0.0108 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 AB193929.1 0.0108 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU454425.1 0.0110 Actinobacteria Actinobacteridae Propionibacterineae EF534291.1 0.0115 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF573554.1 0.0116 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae EU557027.1 0.0116 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU800908.1 0.0117 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF573187.1 0.0120 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572554.1 0.0124 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU802779.1 0.0124 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU137603.1 0.0124 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU381624.1 0.0127 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804542.1 0.0127 Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Pseudomonadaceae EF508975.1 0.0129 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF573159.1 0.0130 Actinobacteria Actinobacteridae Unclassified AY372902.1 0.0130 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU465536.1 0.0135 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU237440.1 0.0135 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EF403170.1 0.0136 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ817613.1 0.0137 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ816188.1 0.0137 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU779034.1 0.0139 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae EU268616.1 0.0139 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ797419.1 0.0139 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae AY163805.1 0.0140 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU506247.1 0.0141 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae AB234526.1 0.0141 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804987.1 0.0141 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572058.1 0.0141 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU344681.1 0.0144 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU802673.1 0.0145 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ805791.1 0.0149 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU461531.1 0.0149 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae AF530068.2 0.0153 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus AY916385.1 0.0153 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804785.1 0.0153 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU530339.1 0.0156 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae EF608512.1 0.0156 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus AB288914.1 0.0156 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae EF593056.1 0.0157 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU772027.1 0.0157 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU655779.1 0.0159 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU804885.1 0.0161 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572017.1 0.0163 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF573242.1 0.0163 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillus EU091310.1 0.0166 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae AB234527.1 0.0169 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EF603511.1 0.0169 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 DQ009198.1 0.0171 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU468228.1 0.0171 Firmicutes Bacilli Unclassified DQ856510.1 0.0171 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572160.1 0.0173 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572975.1 0.0173 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 DQ071039.1 0.0173 Firmicutes Clostridia Clostridiaceae DQ125707.1 0.0173 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ816587.1 0.0175 Enterobacteriales NZABEM010 Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae 00020.1 0.0183 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified DQ015193.1 0.0184 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae EU704201.1 0.0185 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU471938.1 0.0185 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified AY858398.2 0.0188 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU531933.1 0.0190 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus EU460201.1 0.0191 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus AY992519.1 0.0192 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae AM421978.1 0.0192 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ080183.1 0.0194 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 DQ071035.1 0.0194 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572426.1 0.0194 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 DQ071141.1 0.0194 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EF403457.1 0.0194 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ798201.1 0.0195 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 DQ071065.1 0.0195 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572255.1 0.0195 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae EU528229.1 0.0197 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF573444.1 0.0198 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified DQ327133.1 0.0198 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ278909.1 0.0199 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ816132.1 0.0200 Firmicutes Clostridia Ruminococcus DQ802271.1 0.0202 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EU462900.1 0.0202 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EF402763.1 0.0204 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EF572317.1 0.0207 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae AF025366.1 0.0207 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae AM491468.1 0.0208 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ816681.1 0.0210 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EU768009.1 0.0217 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria SAR11 EU805338.1 0.0218 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ279749.1 0.0218 Fibrobacteres TG3-1 Unclassified EF454961.1 0.0221 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ794660.1 0.0221 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium EF400958.1 0.0224 Acidobacteria Acidobacteriae Unclassified EU132307.1 0.0224 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ817567.1 0.0225 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified EU468857.1 0.0225 Firmicutes Clostridia Faecalibacterium DQ806334.1 0.0226 Firmicutes Clostridia Unclassified AB234469.1 0.0226 Enterobacteriales Proteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Enterobacteriaceae DQ816676.1 0.0228 Enterobacteriales
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Glucose Non-Fermenting Gram Negative Rods
    UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations Identification of Glucose Non-Fermenting Gram Negative Rods REVIEW UNDER Issued by the Standards Unit, Microbiology Services, PHE Bacteriology – Identification | ID 17 | Issue no: 2.2 | Issue date: 11.03.14 | Page: 1 of 24 © Crown copyright 2014 Identification of Glucose Non-Fermenting Gram Negative Rods Acknowledgments UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations (SMIs) are developed under the auspices of Public Health England (PHE) working in partnership with the National Health Service (NHS), Public Health Wales and with the professional organisations whose logos are displayed below and listed on the website http://www.hpa.org.uk/SMI/Partnerships. SMIs are developed, reviewed and revised by various working groups which are overseen by a steering committee (see http://www.hpa.org.uk/SMI/WorkingGroups). The contributions of many individuals in clinical, specialist and reference laboratories who have provided information and comments during the development of this document are acknowledged. We are grateful to the Medical Editors for editing the medical content. For further information please contact us at: Standards Unit Microbiology Services Public Health England 61 Colindale Avenue London NW9 5EQ E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.hpa.org.uk/SMI UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations are produced in association with: REVIEW UNDER Bacteriology – Identification | ID 17 | Issue no: 2.2 | Issue date: 11.03.14 | Page: 2 of 24 UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations | Issued by the Standards Unit, Public Health England Identification of Glucose Non-Fermenting Gram Negative Rods Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................... 2 AMENDMENT TABLE ............................................................................................................. 4 UK STANDARDS FOR MICROBIOLOGY INVESTIGATIONS: SCOPE AND PURPOSE ......
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Heterotrophic Stream Biofilm Communities to a Gradient of Resources
    The following supplement accompanies the article Response of heterotrophic stream biofilm communities to a gradient of resources D. J. Van Horn1,*, R. L. Sinsabaugh1, C. D. Takacs-Vesbach1, K. R. Mitchell1,2, C. N. Dahm1 1Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 2Present address: Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of British Columbia Life Sciences Centre, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z3, Canada *Email: [email protected] Aquatic Microbial Ecology 64:149–161 (2011) Table S1. Representative sequences for each OTU, associated GenBank accession numbers, and taxonomic classifications with bootstrap values (in parentheses), generated in mothur using 14956 reference sequences from the SILVA data base Treatment Accession Sequence name SILVA taxonomy classification number Control JF695047 BF8FCONT18Fa04.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Gammaproteobacteria(100);Pseudomonadales(100);Pseudomonadaceae(100);Cellvibrio(100);unclassified; Control JF695049 BF8FCONT18Fa12.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Alphaproteobacteria(100);Rhizobiales(100);Methylocystaceae(100);uncultured(100);unclassified; Control JF695054 BF8FCONT18Fc01.b1 Bacteria(100);Planctomycetes(100);Planctomycetacia(100);Planctomycetales(100);Planctomycetaceae(100);Isosphaera(50);unclassified; Control JF695056 BF8FCONT18Fc04.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Gammaproteobacteria(100);Xanthomonadales(100);Xanthomonadaceae(100);uncultured(64);unclassified; Control JF695057 BF8FCONT18Fc06.b1 Bacteria(100);Proteobacteria(100);Betaproteobacteria(100);Burkholderiales(100);Comamonadaceae(100);Ideonella(54);unclassified;
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 13 April 2017); Using Diamond
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/347021; this version posted June 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 2 3 4 5 Re-evaluating the salty divide: phylogenetic specificity of 6 transitions between marine and freshwater systems 7 8 9 10 Sara F. Pavera, Daniel J. Muratorea, Ryan J. Newtonb, Maureen L. Colemana# 11 a 12 Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA 13 b School of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA 14 15 Running title: Marine-freshwater phylogenetic specificity 16 17 #Address correspondence to Maureen Coleman, [email protected] 18 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/347021; this version posted June 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 19 Abstract 20 Marine and freshwater microbial communities are phylogenetically distinct and transitions 21 between habitat types are thought to be infrequent. We compared the phylogenetic diversity of 22 marine and freshwater microorganisms and identified specific lineages exhibiting notably high or 23 low similarity between marine and freshwater ecosystems using a meta-analysis of 16S rRNA 24 gene tag-sequencing datasets. As expected, marine and freshwater microbial communities 25 differed in the relative abundance of major phyla and contained habitat-specific lineages; at the 26 same time, however, many shared taxa were observed in both environments. 27 Betaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria sequences had the highest similarity between 28 marine and freshwater sample pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • BEI Resources Product Information Sheet Catalog No. NR-51597 Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Strain MRSN 23861
    Product Information Sheet for NR-51597 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Strain MRSN P. aeruginosa is a Gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped bacterium with unipolar motility that thrives in many diverse 23861 environments including soil, water and certain eukaryotic hosts. It is a key emerging opportunistic pathogen in animals, Catalog No. NR-51597 including humans and plants. While it rarely infects healthy This reagent is the tangible property of the U.S. Government. individuals, P. aeruginosa causes severe acute and chronic nosocomial infections in immunocompromised or catheterized patients, especially in patients with cystic fibrosis, burns, For research use only. Not for human use. cancer or HIV.3-5 Infections of this type are often highly antibiotic resistant, difficult to eradicate and often lead to Contributor: death. The ability of P. aeruginosa to survive on minimal Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance nutritional requirements, tolerate a variety of physical Network (MRSN), Bacterial Disease Branch, Walter Reed conditions and rapidly develop resistance during the course of Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA therapy has allowed it to persist in both community and 5,6 hospital settings. Manufacturer: BEI Resources Material Provided: Each vial contains approximately 0.5 mL of bacterial culture in Product Description: Tryptic Soy broth supplemented with 10% glycerol. Bacteria Classification: Pseudomonadaceae, Pseudomonas Species: Pseudomonas aeruginosa Note: If homogeneity is required for your intended use, please Strain: MRSN 23861 purify prior to initiating work. Original Source: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), strain MRSN 23861 was isolated in 2014 from a human Packaging/Storage: respiratory sample as part of a surveillance program in the NR-51597 was packaged aseptically in cryovials.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S4. Phylogenetic Distribution of Bacterial and Archaea Genomes in Groups A, B, C, D, and X
    Table S4. Phylogenetic distribution of bacterial and archaea genomes in groups A, B, C, D, and X. Group A a: Total number of genomes in the taxon b: Number of group A genomes in the taxon c: Percentage of group A genomes in the taxon a b c cellular organisms 5007 2974 59.4 |__ Bacteria 4769 2935 61.5 | |__ Proteobacteria 1854 1570 84.7 | | |__ Gammaproteobacteria 711 631 88.7 | | | |__ Enterobacterales 112 97 86.6 | | | | |__ Enterobacteriaceae 41 32 78.0 | | | | | |__ unclassified Enterobacteriaceae 13 7 53.8 | | | | |__ Erwiniaceae 30 28 93.3 | | | | | |__ Erwinia 10 10 100.0 | | | | | |__ Buchnera 8 8 100.0 | | | | | | |__ Buchnera aphidicola 8 8 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pantoea 8 8 100.0 | | | | |__ Yersiniaceae 14 14 100.0 | | | | | |__ Serratia 8 8 100.0 | | | | |__ Morganellaceae 13 10 76.9 | | | | |__ Pectobacteriaceae 8 8 100.0 | | | |__ Alteromonadales 94 94 100.0 | | | | |__ Alteromonadaceae 34 34 100.0 | | | | | |__ Marinobacter 12 12 100.0 | | | | |__ Shewanellaceae 17 17 100.0 | | | | | |__ Shewanella 17 17 100.0 | | | | |__ Pseudoalteromonadaceae 16 16 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pseudoalteromonas 15 15 100.0 | | | | |__ Idiomarinaceae 9 9 100.0 | | | | | |__ Idiomarina 9 9 100.0 | | | | |__ Colwelliaceae 6 6 100.0 | | | |__ Pseudomonadales 81 81 100.0 | | | | |__ Moraxellaceae 41 41 100.0 | | | | | |__ Acinetobacter 25 25 100.0 | | | | | |__ Psychrobacter 8 8 100.0 | | | | | |__ Moraxella 6 6 100.0 | | | | |__ Pseudomonadaceae 40 40 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pseudomonas 38 38 100.0 | | | |__ Oceanospirillales 73 72 98.6 | | | | |__ Oceanospirillaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Therapy on Gastric Microbiome
    Impact of Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Therapy on Gastric Microbiome Liqi Mao The First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5972- 4746 Yanlin Zhou The First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Shuangshuang Wang The First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Lin Chen The First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Yue Hu The First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Leimin Yu The First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Jingming Xu The First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Bin Lyu ( [email protected] ) First Aliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6247-571X Research Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing, Helicobacter pylori, Eradication therapy, Gastric microora, Atrophic gastritis Posted Date: April 29th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-455395/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License 1 Impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on gastric microbiome 2 Liqi Mao 1,#, Yanlin Zhou 1,#, Shuangshuang Wang1,2, Lin Chen1, Yue Hu 1, Leimin Yu1,3, 3 Jingming Xu1, Bin Lyu1,* 4 1Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical 5 University, Hangzhou, China 6 2Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to 7 Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China 8 3Department of Gastroenterology, Guangxing Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese 9 Medical University, Hangzhou, China 10 #Liqi Mao and Yanlin Zhou contributed equally. 11 *Bin Lyu is the corresponding author, Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Yu-Chen Ling and John W. Moreau
    Microbial Distribution and Activity in a Coastal Acid Sulfate Soil System Introduction: Bioremediation in Yu-Chen Ling and John W. Moreau coastal acid sulfate soil systems Method A Coastal acid sulfate soil (CASS) systems were School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia formed when people drained the coastal area Microbial distribution controlled by environmental parameters Microbial activity showed two patterns exposing the soil to the air. Drainage makes iron Microbial structures can be grouped into three zones based on the highest similarity between samples (Fig. 4). Abundant populations, such as Deltaproteobacteria, kept constant activity across tidal cycling, whereas rare sulfides oxidize and release acidity to the These three zones were consistent with their geological background (Fig. 5). Zone 1: Organic horizon, had the populations changed activity response to environmental variations. Activity = cDNA/DNA environment, low pH pore water further dissolved lowest pH value. Zone 2: surface tidal zone, was influenced the most by tidal activity. Zone 3: Sulfuric zone, Abundant populations: the heavy metals. The acidity and toxic metals then Method A Deltaproteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria this area got neutralized the most. contaminate coastal and nearby ecosystems and Method B 1.5 cause environmental problems, such as fish kills, 1.5 decreased rice yields, release of greenhouse gases, Chloroflexi and construction damage. In Australia, there is Gammaproteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria about a $10 billion “legacy” from acid sulfate soils, Chloroflexi even though Australia is only occupied by around 1.0 1.0 Cyanobacteria,@ Acidobacteria Acidobacteria Alphaproteobacteria 18% of the global acid sulfate soils. Chloroplast Zetaproteobacteria Rare populations: Alphaproteobacteria Method A log(RNA(%)+1) Zetaproteobacteria log(RNA(%)+1) Method C Method B 0.5 0.5 Cyanobacteria,@ Bacteroidetes Chloroplast Firmicutes Firmicutes Bacteroidetes Planctomycetes Planctomycetes Ac8nobacteria Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Environmental and Cultivable Antibiotic- Resistant Microbial Communities Associated with Wastewater Treatment
    antibiotics Article Characterization of Environmental and Cultivable Antibiotic- Resistant Microbial Communities Associated with Wastewater Treatment Alicia Sorgen 1, James Johnson 2, Kevin Lambirth 2, Sandra M. Clinton 3 , Molly Redmond 1 , Anthony Fodor 2 and Cynthia Gibas 2,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (M.R.) 2 Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected] (J.J.); [email protected] (K.L.); [email protected] (A.F.) 3 Department of Geography & Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-704-687-8378 Abstract: Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing global concern, threatening human and environmental health, particularly among urban populations. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are thought to be “hotspots” for antibiotic resistance dissemination. The conditions of WWTPs, in conjunction with the persistence of commonly used antibiotics, may favor the selection and transfer of resistance genes among bacterial populations. WWTPs provide an important ecological niche to examine the spread of antibiotic resistance. We used heterotrophic plate count methods to identify Citation: Sorgen, A.; Johnson, J.; phenotypically resistant cultivable portions of these bacterial communities and characterized the Lambirth, K.; Clinton,
    [Show full text]
  • The Associated Growth of Pseudomonas Fluorescens
    THE ASSOCIATED GROWTH OF PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS, ESCHERICHIA COLI AND / OR LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM IN ASEPTICALLY-PREPARED FRESH GROUND BEEF AT 7 °C OR AT 4 AND 25 °C OF STORAGE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Yi-Mei Sun, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Prof. Herbert W. Ockerman, Advisor Approved by Prof. John C. Gordon Prof. Curtis L. Knipe ___________________________ Advisor Prof. Ahmed E. Yousef Department of Animal Sciences UMI Number: 3119496 ________________________________________________________ UMI Microform 3119496 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ____________________________________________________________ ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ABSTRACT This research was conducted to understand the interactions between normal background microorganisms (Pseudomonas and Lactobacillus) and Escherichia coli on solid food such as fresh ground beef. By using aseptically-obtained fresh ground beef as a model, different levels of background bacteria along with different levels of E. coli were inoculated and applied in three experiments at different storage temperatures. In Experiment I, three levels (zero, 3 logs and 6 logs) of Pseudomonas were combined with three levels (zero, 2 logs and 4 logs) of E. coli and stored at 7 ºC for 7 days. One log increase of VRBA (E. coli) counts was observed for treatments with 2 log E. coli inoculation but no changes were found for treatments with 4 log E.
    [Show full text]
  • Staphylococcus Spp., Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 6 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 1 0 4 1 – 1 0 4 6 availab le at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aob Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae oral isolates from Brazilian HIV-positive patients. Correlation with CD4 cell counts and viral load a, a Graziella Nuernberg Back-Brito *, Vivian Narana Ribeiro El Ackhar , a b Silvia Maria Rodrigues Querido , Silvana Sole´o Ferreira dos Santos , a c Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge , Alexandre de Souza de Macedo Reis , a Cristiane Yumi Koga-Ito a Department of Oral Biosciences and Diagnosis, Laboratory of Microbiology, Sa˜ o Jose´ dos Campos Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista/ UNESP, Brazil b Microbiology, University of Taubate´, Brazil c Day Hospital, University of Taubate´, Brazil a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The aim was to evaluate the presence of Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudo- Accepted 23 February 2011 monadaceae in the oral cavities of HIV-positive patients. Forty-five individuals diagnosed as HIV-positive by ELISA and Western-blot, and under anti-retroviral therapy for at least 1 year, Keywords: were included in the study. The control group constituted 45 systemically healthy individu- HIV als matched to the HIV patients to gender, age and oral conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudomonas Syringae Pv. Actinidiae Takikdawa Et Al
    JUL10Pathogen of the month – July 2010 . 1989 et al a b cdc Fig. 1. Drop of white exudate from an infected kiwifruit shoot (a); production of red exudate from an infected cane (b); an infected shoot wilting and dying in early summer (c); and small angular necrotic leaf spots caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv actinidiae (d). Photo credits J. L. Vanneste. Disease: Bacterial canker of kiwifruit Classification: D: Bacteria, C: Gammaproteobacteria, O: Pseudomonadales, F: Pseudomonadaceae Takikdawa Bacterial canker of kiwifruit (Fig. 1), caused by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), affects different species of Actinidia including A. deliciosa and A. chinensis, the two species that constitute the majority of kiwifruit (green and yellow-fleshed) grown commercially around the world. This pathogen was first described in Japan in 1984. It was subsequently isolated in Korea and in Italy. Its economical impact can be significant, as is the case with the current outbreak in Latina (Italy). Distribution and Host Range: During summer the most visible symptoms are small This disease is present in Japan, Korea and Italy. angular necrotic spots on leaves, often surrounded by Earlier reports of bacterial canker of kiwifruit from a yellow halo. This halo reveals production by the Iran and the USA refer to a different disease caused pathogen of phytotoxins such as phaseolotoxin or . actinidiae by the related pathogen P. s. pv. syringae. New coronatine. However, not all strains of Psa produce Zealand and Australia are free of the disease. those toxins. During harvest and leaf fall, when environmental pv Symptoms and Life Cycle: conditions are still warm and showery, the bacteria Infections occur preferentially when the can move into these wounds and lay dormant until temperatures are relatively low, such as in spring spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogenic Vibrio Species Are Associated with Distinct Environmental Niches and Planktonic Taxa in Southern California (USA) Aquatic Microbiomes
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Pathogenic Vibrio Species Are Associated with Distinct Environmental Niches and Planktonic Taxa in Southern California (USA) Aquatic Microbiomes Rachel E. Diner,a,b,c Drishti Kaul,c Ariel Rabines,a,c Hong Zheng,c Joshua A. Steele,d John F. Griffith,d Andrew E. Allena,c aScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA bDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA cMicrobial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California, USA dSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, California, USA ABSTRACT Interactions between vibrio bacteria and the planktonic community impact marine ecology and human health. Many coastal Vibrio spp. can infect humans, represent- ing a growing threat linked to increasing seawater temperatures. Interactions with eukaryo- tic organisms may provide attachment substrate and critical nutrients that facilitate the per- sistence, diversification, and spread of pathogenic Vibrio spp. However, vibrio interactions with planktonic organisms in an environmental context are poorly understood. We quanti- fied the pathogenic Vibrio species V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus,andV. vulnificus monthly for 1 year at five sites and observed high abundances, particularly during summer months, with species-specific temperature and salinity distributions. Using metabarcoding, we estab- lished a detailed profile of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic coastal microbial communities. We found that pathogenic Vibrio species were frequently associated with distinct eukaryo- tic amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), including diatoms and copepods. Shared environ- mental conditions, such as high temperatures and low salinities, were associated with both high concentrations of pathogenic vibrios and potential environmental reservoirs, which may influence vibrio infection risks linked to climate change and should be incorporated into predictive ecological models and experimental laboratory systems.
    [Show full text]